Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3710_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
32 Мб
Скачать

Procedure

5
Procedure
The patient was taken to the operating room and was placed in the lateral retroperitoneal position with the left side up. Arterial line, Swan-Ganz catheter, and Foley catheter were placed. A spinal drain was placed.
A retroperitoneal incision was made from the previous paramedian incision below the umbili­cus laterally over the tenth rib onto the chest. The chest was opened. The diaphragm was opened in a circumferential fashion approximately 2cm lat­eral to its insertion on the chest wall. The retro­peritoneal dissection was continued medially toward the aorta. The kidney and ureter were elevated on the medial portion of the incision, and dissection was carried posterior to that down to the aorta.
The subdiaphragmatic aorta was identied. The inferior pulmonary ligament was dissected free to allow exposure of this segment of the aorta. Proximal control was obtained by dissec­tion posterior and anterior to the aorta above the diaphragm.
Next, the large pulsatile mass beneath the kid­ney was dissected free. The aortic hiatus was dis­sected free, and the crus of the diaphragm was dissected. The dissection was carried down, and the origin of the celiac artery was identied.
Next, the left renal artery was identied and was dissected back to its origin off the aorta. The kidney was dissected off this large pseudoaneu­rysm. The entire lateral aspect of the aneurysm was exposed.
The spinal uid was drained (approximately 50cc’s), and papaverine was placed into the spi­nal canal. Next, the supradiaphragmatic aortic clamp was placed. After the aorta was cross­clamped, the false aneurysm was opened up using electrocautery and scissors. Upon opening the large anastomotic aneurysm in the lower por­tion of the aneurysm, the old woven graft was identied. There was a broken suture sitting inside the aneurysm. The aortic graft had com­pletely become unincorporated with the aorta, and the large aneurysm was surrounding the free end of the graft inside the lumen.
The right renal, left renal, and SMA orices were identied. Irrigating Fogarty catheters were placed in these orices and helped control bleed­ing. Iced Lactated Ringer’s solution was then infused into all these, both renal arteries and SMA, to help preserve the renal and the intes­tines. The proximal aorta was debrided, and it was felt that a graft could be sutured to the orice of the SMA and right renal. A 20 millimeter Gortex graft was then brought onto the eld, and this was sutured in placed with 3-0 cardiovascu­lar Prolene suture. The beveled anastomosis was performed proximally including the SMA inferi­orly and the right renal artery.
After the proximal anastomosis was com­pleted, a silver clip was placed at the proximal anastomosis. Clamps were placed distally and ow was restored to the celiac, SMA, and right renal. After ow was restored, it was noted the clamp time was 33 minutes. The Dacron graft was sized at the appropriate length and sutured in an end to end fashion to the remotely placed Dacron graft using 3-0 cardiovascular Prolene in a simple running fashion.
Prior to completion of the anastomosis, anterograde and retrograde bleeding was per­formed. The anastomosis was tied. The flow was restored to the legs.
A 6 millimeter PTFE (W.L. Gore, Newark, DE) side graft, which had previously been sutured onto the graft prior to being placed in the patient, was cut to the appropriate length and bypass graft and then sutured end to the end of the left renal artery. The kidney was small, approximately 8cm, but renal artery was patent. A 1 millimeter probe was easily passed through the rst branch of the renal artery. The renal artery was then sutured in an end-to-end fashion with a 6-0 Prolene simple running suture. After this was sutured into place, the anastomosis was tied, and ow was restored to the kidney. There was a good Doppler signal in both branches of the renal artery.
The patient developed some evidence of coag­ulopathy, and coagulation factors were replaced, and the patient was warmed. After hemostasis was obtained, the aneurysm sac was closed over
6
1 Symptomatic Proximal Anastomotic Pseudoaneurysm ofSuprarenal Aorta
the aortic graft with interrupted 3-0 Vicryl sutures. The pleura was closed over the thoracic aorta with interrupted 3-0 Vicryl sutures. Next, the diaphragm was closed with interrupted 2-0 Prolene interrupted horizontal mattress sutures. After the diaphragm was closed, the intercostal stitches were placed with a #2 doubled PDS suture. The chest tube was placed through an anterior incision above the operative incision. A #32 French chest tube was placed posteriorly and was tied in place with a 2-0 silk. After the chest tube was in adequate place, the intercostal stitches were tied, and the diaphragm was approximated.
There was palpable pulse in renal arteries, celiac artery, and superior mesenteric artery. Dressings were applied. Chest tube was con­nected to water seal. The patient was then trans­ferred to the intensive care unit in satisfactory condition. Patient was subsequently discharged in satisfactory condition and lost to follow-up 4years later.

Discussion

Proximal anastomotic pseudoaneurysms after AAA repair are uncommon as compared to distal iliac and femoral anastomotic aneurysms. Hallet etal. reported nine para-anastomotic aneurysms at a median follow-up of 6.1years and three at the proximal aortic anastomosis [1]. Conrad etal. reported six visceral segment aneurysms, three of which underwent open repair among 152 patients who underwent surveillance with imaging stud­ies following open AAA repair [2].
A proximal aortic para-anastomotic pseudoa­neurysm developed in six patients (2.9%) in a retrospective study of 208 patients who survived elective open repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysm [3]. Crawford etal. reported a long-term outcome of open repair of AAA.During a 15-year follow­ up, late complications occurred in 26 (3.2%) patients with anastomotic pseudoaneurysms in 23 patients and secondary aortoenteric stula in the remaining 3 patients [4]. Following an open AAA repair, an anastomotic aneurysm or aneu­rysmal dilatation of adjacent visceral segment and/or iliac arteries may occur in 1%, 5%, and
20% at 5, 10, and 15years, respectively. Therefore CTA abdomen and pelvis should be obtained every 5years after open repair.
All patients with proximal para-anastomotic pseudoaneurysms do not need repair. Repair of such aneurysms is dictated by their size (>5.5cm) and coexisting medical comorbidities. When indicated, retroperitoneal ank approach is pre­ferred. The role of endovascular repair with branched endografts is not clearly dened in the management of para-anastomotic pseudoaneu­rysms. In patients undergoing repair of type IV thoracoabdominal aneurysm, continuous cold perfusion of the left kidney can be carried out during performing of distal anastomosis [5, 6]. Postischemic renal dieresis occurs commonly when suprarenal clamp time exceeds 30minutes. Patients should have adequate volume replace­ment. Postoperatively, a spinal cord protection protocol is maintained for at least 24hours in all patients treated with a lumbar drain [5, 6]. This case illustrates the importance of careful follow­ up with imaging studies, as well as adequate treatment of hypertension. It is possible that uncontrolled blood pressure in this case led to rapid enlargement of juxtarenal AAA before the rst operation and probably played a role in the development of proximal para-anastomotic pseudoaneurysm.
Invited Commentary fromCharles W.Acher, MD
What is striking about this patient is his age of 37 at the time of his rst aneurysm repair. Even with such severe malignant hypertension, which was diagnosed and treated 10 years previously, it is unusual to develop an aneurysm at this age with­out some underlying genetic molecular disorder which we can now test for but was unavailable at the time of either aneurysm repair. A smoking history was not mentioned but would be present in most of these patients. His mental decompen­sation in 1980 after stopping his medications might very well have been hypertensive encepha­lopathy, or encephalopathy may have contributed, but it also raised the question of how consistent he was in controlling his blood pressures in the
Invited Commentary fromCharles W.Acher, MD
7
decade preceding and after his initial aneurysm surgery with what was undoubtedly a hyperten­sive stroke in 1973, a year after diagnosing his hypertension. Also, in 1981 he already had hyper­tensive nephropathy with diminished renal func­tion, and he may have been malnourished from aneurysm-related anorexia with a BMI of 14.1. All of these factors may have contributed to his subsequent aneurysm/pseudoaneurysm 13 years later.
The actual repair of his aneurysm/pseudoaneu­rysm in 1994 appears to have gone awlessly and demonstrates several points which are important in planning and executing such a complicated repair even today and were ahead of their time in
1994. The use of a spinal drain was not done in most centers in 1994. We reported the largest clin­ical series up to that time of 40 TAAA patients in 1989 with experience since 1986 showing an 80% reduction in spinal cord injury, but general accep­tance of spinal drains did not really take hold until Coselli’s randomized trial in 1999 [7]. In 1994 we would have drained CSF, but in a surgery like this today, we might avoid the spinal drain but use the rest of our spinal cord protection protocol which is hypothermia (32–33 °C), proximal hyperten­sion, steroids and naloxone, plus aggressive vol­ume resuscitation with blood (cell saver and bank) and FFP.We would use spinal drainage for a true Crawford type 4 TAAA in most cases. Renal cool­ing with iced saline was also not standard in 1994 but is the best strategy for renal protection. We always advocated rapid renal cooling (over 2–4minutes) with 300–400 infusion of LR with
12.5 gm and 1000units of heparin/liter at 4C into each kidney [6]. This is very protective with per­manent dialysis- dependent renal failure in 0.8% of our patients and was conrmed by a random­ized trial by Lamaire and Coselli [8]. Also I think it was important to investigate the left kidney and revascularize for maximum renal preservation if the renal artery was not occluded as suggested by the pre-op imaging. The cold renal perfusion is important in attaining moderate hypothermia (32– 33°C) which is end-organ (kidney, bowel, liver) protection during aortic reconstruction [9]. We do not reverse hypothermia with active warming (no bare huggers) and allow patients to rewarm on their own over several hours in the ICU. This
intentional hypothermia has not resulted in increased bleeding or postoperative bleeding because we are very aggressive with volume and factor replacement during the surgery and patients are on an FFP drip at 75cc per hour until the next day. We feel this hypothermia is protective of the spinal cord in more extensive replacements until the axial collateral network dened so elegantly by Etz and Griepp improves blood ow to the cord [10]. In this case that is not as important because of the limited aortic replacement but is important for the bowel and liver which we do not perfuse directly.
There are a few other technical points that have changed since 1994 when we exposed and closed in much the same way as described. We do extraperitoneal exposure now and have for the last 20years if the incision is in the 7th intercos­tal space or lower, and we close the diaphragm with a running double-stranded 0 PDS suture and not interrupted Ethibond. In 5th and 6th inter­space incisions, we still may need interrupted Ethibond for the last third of the diaphragm which are tied after the chest wall is approxi­mated. In addition to a chest tube, we also drain the retroperitoneum with a 10 at JP drain with a ReliaVac reservoir which maintains a constant
-80 mmhg suction to minimize uid and blood from accumulating in the retroperitoneum and has a one-way valve so reservoir contents don’t reux back into the drain. Just as important as the surgical repair are the anesthetic protocols which are standardized in our unit. All of these cases are done by cardiovascular anesthesiologists who follow the protocols that have been developed from basic science and experience and modied by consensus as new information comes to light that has strong scientic foundation. Postoperative ICU protocols are also important to optimize car­diac function, hemodynamics, oxygen delivery, and tissue perfusion. These protocols have been agreed upon by the anesthesiologists, surgeons, and intensivists who we co-manage with daily while in the ICU with face-to-face interactions.
Reading about this case brought back memo­ries of those patients we treat successfully who disappear into the ether of time and we wonder what happened to them. Did all that work result in a longer and better life? It also brings home the
8
1 Symptomatic Proximal Anastomotic Pseudoaneurysm ofSuprarenal Aorta
reason we try so hard to maintain contact with these patients so we can better understand the long-term success or failure of our efforts.

References

1. Hallett JW, Marshall DM, Petterson TM, Gray DT, et al. Graft-related complications after abdomi­nal aortic aneurysm repair: reassurance from a 36-year population-based experience. J Vasc Surg. 1997;25(2):277–84; discussion 285–286.
2. Conrad MF, Crawford RS, Pedraza JD, Brewster DC, etal. Long-term durability of open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46(4):669–75.
3. Crawford ES, Saleh SA, Babb JW, Glaeser DH, Vaccaro PS, Silvers A. Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm: factors inuencing survival after opera­tion performed over a 25-year period. Ann Surg. 1981;193(6):699–709.
4. Biancari F, Ylönen K, Anttila V, Juvonen J, Romsi P, Satta J, Juvonen T.Durability of open repair of infra­renal abdominal aortic aneurysm: a 15-year follow-up study. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35(1):87–93.
5. Shepard AD. Proximal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in endovascular reconstruction. In: Hans SS,
Shephard AD, Weaver MR, Bove PG, Long GW, edi­tors. Endovascular and open vascular reconstruction: a practical approach. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2018. p.213–20.
6. Wynn MM, Acher C, Marks E, Engelbert T, Acher CW. Post operative renal failure in thoracoabdomi­nal aortic aneurysm repair with simple cross-clamp technique and 4°C renal perfusion. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(3):611–22.
7. Acher CW, Wynn MM, Archibald J.Naloxone and spinal uid drainage as adjuncts in the surgical treat­ment of thoracoabdominal and thoracic aneurysms. Surgery. 1990;108(4):755–61; discussion 61–2.
8. Coselli JS, LeMaire SA, Koksoy C, Schmittling ZC, Curling PE. Cerebrospinal uid drainage reduces paraplegia after thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: results of a randomized clinical trial. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35(4):631–9.
9. Koksoy C, LeMaire SA, Curling PE, etal. Renal per­fusion during thoracoabdominal aortic operations: cold crystalloid is superior to normothermic blood. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73(3):730–8.
10. Etz CD, Kari FA, Mueller CS, Brenner RM, Lin HM, Griepp RB.The collateral network concept: remodel­ing of the arterial collateral network after experimen­tal segmental artery sacrice. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141(4):1029–36.
Repair ofJuxtarenal Abdominal
ab
Aortic Aneurysm withAortorenal Bypass
2

Physical Examination

A 68-year-old male was scheduled for open repair of a 5.0cm abdominal aortic aneurysm (AP/transverse diameter) in February 2005. The aneurysm was jux­tarenal with associated 2.8 cm bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms and a 2.0cm left hypogastric artery aneurysm (Fig.2.1a). Preoperative aortogra­phy showed accessory left lower pole renal artery (Fig.2.1b). Medical comorbidities included history
of atrial utter, hypertension, and post- thrombotic syndrome involving both lower extremities.

Procedure

Through midline transperitoneal incision, AAA was exposed to mobilize. Following application of the Bookwalter retractor, and mobilization of the ligament of Treitz, the left renal vein was
Fig. 2.1 (a, b) Aortography showing abdominal aortic
aneurysm and bilateral iliac aneurysm with accessory left lower pole renal artery. Because of large amount of throm-
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 S. S. Hans, Challenging Arterial Reconstructions, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44135-7_2
bus in the abdominal aortic aneurysm, aortogram only shows the contrast-lled lumen
9
10
ab
2 Repair ofJuxtarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm withAortorenal Bypass
ligated close to the inferior vena cava. The aneu­rysm arose at the level of the left renal artery and was saccular with a bulge to the left. Left crus of the diaphragm was divided by electrocautery. Both common iliac artery aneurysms were mobi­lized along with mobilization of the origin of the hypogastric and external iliac artery. Aorta was clamped above the left renal artery and below the right renal artery following systemic hepariniza­tion. Proximal anastomosis was performed using 22 × 11 mm knitted Dacron graft (Meadox, Boston Scientic, Marlborough, MA) in two lay­ers, with the rst layer of interrupted horizontal mattress suture on pledgets with 3-0 cardiovascu­lar polypropylene (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) and a second layer of continuous suture. As the proxi­mal clamp was released, there was excessive bleeding at the 7 o’clock position of the suture line. Reapplication of the clamp a few cm proxi­mally resulted in a tear of the aorta. A #24 Foley balloon catheter was introduced through the left limb of the Dacron graft and inated at the supra­celiac level. Left renal artery was transected at its origin from the aorta. Proximal stump of the renal artery was suture ligated, and deep bites into the left lateral wall of the aorta were taken using hor­izontal mattress sutures of 3-0 cardiovascular Prolene on pledgets. Bio-glue (Cryolife, Kennesaw, GA) was applied to achieve hemosta­sis. A 6 mm PTFE graft (W.L. Gore, Newark,
DE) was anastomosed to the main body of the Dacron graft on the left side just above the bifur­cation of the graft taking out a small disc of Dacron graft using 5-0 cardiovascular polypro­pylene and distally was anastomosed end to end to the divided left renal artery. The left lower pole renal artery was reimplanted into the left limb of the Dacron graft using 5-0 CV polypropylene as well. The left hypogastric aneurysm was excised, and back bleeding was controlled with 4-0 CV polypropylene suture. Because of severe calcic disease in the left external iliac artery, left limb of the graft was anastomosed to the left common femoral artery in an end-to-side fashion. Left common iliac aneurysm was opened, and its wall was partially removed, and proximal left external iliac artery was ligated. On the right side, anasto­mosis of the right limb of the Dacron graft was performed end to end to the common iliac artery at the bifurcation after removal of the aneurysm. The patient received 600cc of blood from the cell saver, and 1 unit of PRBCs was given to the patient. Patient’s post-op course was complicated by respiratory failure which improved with venti­latory support.
The patient was extubated on the third postop­erative day. The patient had transient renal dys­function. Postoperative aortography showed patent aortoiliac and femoral graft and patent left aortorenal bypass (Figs.2.2 and 2.3). Patient did
Fig. 2.2 (a, b) Aortography showing aortic bifurcation graft and left aortorenal bypass

Discussion

Fig. 2.3 Left femoral anastomotic aneurysm
well and underwent repair of 3.5cm left femoral anastomotic aneurysm 8years after the original procedure. The patient later expired from compli­cations of Alzheimer’s dementia in 2017.
Discussion
Operative repair of juxtarenal AAA is a techni­cally challenging operation. In absence of the need to visualize distal right common iliac artery (as was the case for this patient due to
2.5cm right iliac aneurysm), a left ank retro­peritoneal approach is increasingly used for open repair of proximal complex AAA in patients with need to explore the aorta proximal to the renal arteries, redo aortic surgery, AAAs in the presence of a horseshoe kidney, hostile abdomen with prior osteotomies, or inamma­tory AAA.A concomitant renal artery bypass became necessary as proximal aortic clamp resulted in tear of the aorta above the renal arteries [1]. Because of the improvement in medical management of renovascular hyperten­sion, concomitant renal artery bypass with open AAA is rarely indicated. In order to perform suprarenal dissection via transperitoneal approach, mobilization of left renal vein or ligation of left renal vein close to the inferior
11
vena cava preserving gonadal and adrenal vein as venous outow from the kidneys is neces­sary. Mobilization of the left renal vein without division often requires ligation of adrenal vein and gonadal vein. In addition, the left crus of the diaphragm needs to be divided to gain prox­imal aortic exposure.
Follow-up aortography showed satisfactory proximal anastomosis, patent left aortorenal bypass, occluded lower pole renal artery reim­plantation (Fig.2.2), and an anastomotic aneu­rysm involving the graft and left femoral artery. Though not always possible, either tube graft (aorto-aortic) or aortoiliac anastomosis should be preferred as femoral anastomosis may result in increased incidence of surgical site infection, lymphoceles, and late develop­ment of anastomotic aneurysms [1]. Repair of left femoral anastomotic aneurysm was per­formed by interposition of an 8 mm knitted Dacron graft. A left flank approach through 9th or 10th ICS, 9th ICS for paravisceral extent IV thoracoabdominal aneurysms, and 10th ICS for pararenal aortic aneurysms is preferable [1]. Renal, visceral, and occasion­ally spinal cord ischemia may occur with pro­longed proximal clamping [1]. Renal artery reconstruction at the time of open repair of paravisceral aneurysm is associated with increased incidence of acute renal failure and mortality [2, 3]. Minimizing renal ischemia time to less than 40 minutes is important in reducing the risk of acute kidney injury. Before aortic cross clamping above the supra­renal or supraceliac level, hemodynamics need to be optimized. Mannitol 25g is administered 30 minutes prior to aortic cross clamping, though its benefit in preventing renal dysfunc­tion has not been proven. Deery etal. reported from vascular surgery group of New England registry for the repair of complex AAA (defined by need of suprarenal or supraceliac clamping) had higher perioperative mortality (3.2% compared to 1.2% standard infrarenal AAA repair) [4]. Renal or visceral ischemia independently predicted cardiac, respiratory, and renal complications according to results of their study [4].
12
2 Repair ofJuxtarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm withAortorenal Bypass
Invited Commentary fromTimothy J.Nypaver, MD
This operative management of a juxtarenal aneu­rysm highlights many of the intraoperative and postoperative challenges and complications that can and do occur with standard open repair. In addition, juxtarenal aneurysms are now fre­quently managed via endovascular means with use of fenestrated grafts and alternate techniques, including extension of the landing zone more proximally with renal preservation via chimney or snorkel grafts into the renal arteries [5]. This has resulted in less operative exposure for both vascular surgeons and trainees, and the intraop­erative rescue maneuvers, clearly demonstrated in this case, are becoming less familiar to practic­ing vascular surgeon. The author should be con­gratulated with this difcult case, managing a proximal clamp site tear and avulsion of a renal artery with the following critical maneuvers: proximal balloon control (inserted through a limb of the vascular graft), reimplantation of the avulsed renal artery, implantation of an accessory renal artery, and successful management of a bleeding proximal anastomosis. This was accom­plished with minimal blood transfusions and complete operative management and correction of existing aneurysms (the common iliac and the hypogastric aneurysm). In doing so, the patient has been rewarded with a durable operative repair, one that lasted up to his death 12years later from non-aortic causes. This case also indi­rectly highlights the potential benets of endo­vascular repair with its less invasive nature and its reduced operative risk and morbidity. While this patient recovered from this challenging operative management with transient respira­tory failure (3days) and reversible renal dys­function, other patients, frailer or those with more signicant comorbidities, may not have been able to do so. Thus, careful consideration should always be given to each approach, endo­vascular or open, so that the vascular surgeon hopefully can select the right operation for the right patient. While each approach is comple­mentary, it is recognized, as with standard
infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm opera­tions, that endovascular repair will become the more commonly performed and the probable favored approach for repair of juxtarenal aneu­rysms [6].
The author has appropriately pointed out the signicant benets of the left ank retroperito­neal approach. If an open repair is to be under­taken for a juxtarenal or suprarenal aneurysm, for a paravisceral extent IV thoracoabdominal aneurysms, or for a proximal type I endoleak or other complications related to infrarenal endo­grafting, a left ank retroperitoneal approach is preferred. If necessary, the rst 1–2cm of the right renal artery can be dissected and exposed, and in addition, the right common iliac artery can be exposed distally allowing either an anas­tomosis to the mid to distal common iliac or alternately allowing for ligation of the common iliac with the bypass limb then routed to the fem­oral level. Retroperitoneal abdominal aortic aneurysm has been associated with lower esti­mated blood loss and less uid requirement within the rst 24hours following operation than transperitoneal repair [7]. In addition, the left ank retroperitoneal approach allows more fac­ile access to the suprarenal, supramesenteric, and supraceliac levels, all performed thru the same visual plane. Once open repair is selected for a juxtarenal aneurysm, the decision for trans­peritoneal versus retroperitoneal is often based upon the surgeon’s preference and experience and, as illustrated in this example, whether the right iliac artery is extensively involved with the disease process.

References

1. Shepard AD. Proximal abdominal aortic aneurysm
repair. In: Hans SS, Shepard AD, Weaver MR, Bove PG, Long GW, editors. Endovascular and open vas­cular reconstruction: a practical approach. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2018. p. 213–20.
2. Ultee KHJ, Soden PA, Zettervall SL, McCallum JC,
Siracuse JJ, Alef MJ, Vascular Study Group of New England. Perioperative effect of concomitant proce­dures during open infrarenal abdominal aortic aneu­rysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2016;64(4):934–940.e1.
References
13
3. Wooster M, Back M, Patel S, Tanious A, Armstrong P, Shames M.Outcomes of concomitant renal recon­struction during open paravisceral aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66(4):1149–56.
4. Deery SE, Lancaster RT, Baril DT, Indes JE, et al. Contemporary outcomes of open complex abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63(5):1195–200.
5. Lee JT, Greenberg JI, Dalman RL.Early experience with the snorkel technique for juxtarenal aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55:935–46.
6. Soler R, Bartoli MA, Faries C, etal. Fenestrated endo­vascular aneurysm repair and open surgical repair for the treatment of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70(3):683–90.
7. Nypaver TJ, Shepard AD, Reddy DJ, etal. Repair of pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms: an analysis of operative management. Arch Surg. 1993;128:803–13.
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair inaPatient withCeliac Artery Occlusion andaLarge Inferior Mesenteric Artery
3

Physical Examination

A 75-year-old male with history of hyperten­sion, nicotine abuse, and now chronic back pain underwent CTA evaluation of the abdomen for a large pulsatile mass in his abdomen. A 7.4cm infrarenal AAA with 80% stenosis of the celiac artery, 40% stenosis of the superior mesenteric artery, and an enlarged inferior mesenteric artery with a collateral vessel between the celiac and IMA (Fig. 3.1) was demonstrated. Patient had not had any symptoms of intestinal angina.
ab

Procedure

Patient was taken to the hybrid room for pos­sible endovascular or open repair. An aorto­gram performed via the left femoral artery sheath revealed a large collateral artery in the upper abdomen communicating with the IMA (Fig.3.2). Because of the risk of development of bowel infarction due to the coverage of the IMA with EVAR, it was decided to perform open repair. Through a midline laparotomy incision, AAA was explored, and a large col­lateral artery joining the IMA was identied.
Fig. 3.1 (a, b) CTA showing iliac artery stenosis. Mild stenosis of SMA and large AAA
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 S. S. Hans, Challenging Arterial Reconstructions, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44135-7_3
15