Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3710_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
32 Мб
Скачать

References

239
References
1. Chew DKW, Owens CD, Belkin M, Donaldson MC,
et al. Bypass in the absence of ipsilateral greater saphenous vein: safety and superiority of the con­tralateral greater saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:1085–92.
2. Conte HS, Belkin M, Upchurch GR, Mannick JA,
etal. Impact on increasing comorbidity on infraingui­nal reconstruction: a 20-year prospective. Ann Surg. 2001;233(3):445–52.
3. Ambur V, Park P, Gaugher JP, Golarz S, et al. The
impact of chronic kidney disease on lower extremity bypass outcomes in patients with critical limb isch­emia. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69(2):491–6.
Fig. 54.3 Postoperative CTA showing patent femoral-
peroneal bypass
Femoral-Peroneal Bypass forSevere Calcic Disease Using Tourniquet Occlusion
55
Physical Examination andHistory
A 78-year-old male was admitted to the hospital for infected ulcer of the right fourth toe. X-ray of the foot showed osteomyelitis, and he was started on intravenous Zosyn and vancomycin. Doppler arterial study showed severe bilateral supercial femoral artery occlusive disease as well as with infrapopliteal occlusions. Medical comorbidities included ischemic cardiomyopathy (coronary stent), atrial brillation, severe bilateral carotid stenosis, hypertension, and nicotine abuse (80 pack years). Past surgical history included ampu­tation of the right second toe and a right femoral artery repair following coronary intervention 10 years ago due to malfunction of the closure device. Arteriography showed right proximal and midsegment popliteal artery occlusion and near occlusion of the tibial-peroneal trunk and runoff with peroneal artery, posterior tibial artery, and anterior tibial artery were occluded. There was heavy calcication in all the arteries extending from the abdominal aorta to the feet (Fig.55.1). Patient underwent right femoral to midsegment peroneal in situ bypass using tourniquet occlu­sion with healing of the ulcer (Fig. 55.2). Postoperative arteriogram showed patent right femoral-peroneal bypass with a small retained arteriovenous stula in the mid-thigh with faint lling of the supercial femoral vein (Fig.55.3). Postoperative duplex imaging showed patent
graft without demonstration of the stula and with excellent distal ow.
In December 2019 patient was admitted with ischemic gangrene of the toes of the left foot and underwent arteriography which showed patent right femoral-peroneal in situ bypass with throm­bosis of the residual AV stula. Patient under­went left common femoral endarterectomy with bovine pericardial patch for near occlusion with severely calcied plaque involving the left com­mon femoral artery. Patient had signicant improvement in the ischemic lesions of the left foot and was discharged home after 10days stay in the hospital.

Discussion

In patients undergoing femoral-infrapopliteal arterial bypass with severe calcications of the arteries, clamp application to small arteries may result in dissection of the artery and difculty in occluding the target artery with micro bulldog clamps. Tourniquet occlusion in the thigh prior to the performance of distal anastomosis results in better visualization of the operative eld and less dissection of the target runoff arteries in the calf. Since clamp application to the calcied and brit­tle arteries is avoided, the early failure may be improved [1, 2]. Tourniquet time of less than an hour has not shown any adverse effect on the
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 S. S. Hans, Challenging Arterial Reconstructions, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44135-7_55
241
242
Fig. 55.1 Showing preoperative popliteal artery occlusion and severe stenosis of the tibio-peroneal trunk and runoff
with peroneal artery
55 Femoral-Peroneal Bypass forSevere Calcic Disease Using Tourniquet Occlusion
Fig. 55.2 Operative pictures showing right femoral to peroneal bypass using tourniquet occlusion
muscle biopsy specimens [1]. Bergamini et al. reported on 361 consecutive in situ saphenous vein bypasses and reported 6-year primary patency of 63% and a secondary patency of 87% [3]. They revised 86 (24%) venous conduits because of a technical failure or inadequate vein segment. In the follow-up period, 95 (26%) bypasses were revised because of thrombus or hemodynamic failure. Retained valve reex (N6) and stula ligation (N4) were required by careful duplex ultrasound imaging assessment during the operation and during follow-up period.
Retained valve leaets may result in early
thrombosis. In a large diameter vein, the graft
may not thrombose, but an intimal hyperplastic stenosis threatening the patency of the bypass may occur during follow-up. Residual arteriove­nous stula, if small (either no lling or very poor lling of the deep veins), may thrombose spontaneously as occurred in the patient described in the report. However large arteriovenous stula may threaten the patency of the graft. Long-term patency of in situ bypass is dependent on the quality of the conduit and atherosclerotic disease in the inow arteries. Careful intraoperative and postoperative surveillance by duplex imaging helps prevent the thrombosis of the graft by cor­recting the hemodynamic failure due to graft

References

243
Fig. 55.3 Showing patent right femoral-peroneal bypass with residual arteriovenous stula in the upper thigh with
minimal lling of the deep vein
stenosis by angioplasty or open surgical revision. Residual arteriovenous stulas can be treated with coil embolization or ligation.
References
1. Cierro A, Dardik H, Quin F, Silvestri F, etal. The tour­niquet revisited as an attempt to lower limb revascular­ization. J Vasc Surg. 2000;31(3):436–42.
2. Wagner WH, Trieman RL, Cosman DV, Cohen J, etal. Tourniquet occlusion for tibial artery construction. J Vasc Surg. 1993;18:637–47.
3. Bergamini TM, Town JB, Bandyk DF, Seabrook GR. Experience within situ saphenous vein bypass during 1981–1989. Detrimental factors of long-term patency. J Vasc Surg. 1991;13(1):137–49.
Femoral Distal Posterior Tibial Bypass forEstablished Gangrene

Physical Examination

A 70-year-old male was admitted to the hospital with gangrene of the toes of the left foot (Fig.56.1). He was started on intravenous Zosyn and vancomycin. He underwent noninvasive Doppler arterial study and arteriography. Arteriography showed left supercial femoral artery and popliteal artery occlusion with runoff with peroneal artery and posterior tibial artery. Posterior tibial artery was occluded in the rst few centimeters; plantar arch was incomplete (Fig.56.2).
56

Procedure

On September 13, 2016, patient underwent left femoral to distal posterior tibial in situ bypass with amputation of the left second, third, fourth, and fth toe at trans-metatarsal level. Through an oblique left groin incision, common femoral supercial and deep femoral arteries were exposed. Thrombus was removed from the super­cial femoral artery at its origin, and proximal anastomosis of greater saphenous vein was done end to end to the proximal supercial femoral artery. A retrograde valvulotome was introduced, and valve leaets were incised to obtain a pulsa­tile ow. In the distal portion of the calf, dissec­tion was deepened down between the tibialis posterior tendon and exor digitalis longus, and
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 S. S. Hans, Challenging Arterial Reconstructions, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44135-7_56
Fig. 56.1 Gangrene toes of the left foot
posterior tibial artery was exposed, and distal anastomosis was performed with 7-0 cardiovas­cular polypropylene in an end-to-side fashion. Patient was prepped and draped again after wound closure, and amputation of the second, third, fourth, and fth toe was performed just
245
246
Fig. 56.2 Preoperative arteriography showing left supercial femoral and left popliteal artery occlusion with runoff via
posterior tibial and peroneal artery
56 Femoral Distal Posterior Tibial Bypass forEstablished Gangrene
3 years (last follow-up October 2019) with patent graft. He wears specially made orthotics for ambulation.
Fig. 56.3 Healing of amputation site (toes)
proximal to metatarsal heads. Patient had an uneventful postoperative course and amputation site healed in 6 weeks’ time (Fig. 56.3). Postoperative arteriography 1 year later showed patent left femoral posterior tibial bypass (Fig.56.4). Patient has been followed for the past

Discussion

Femoral distal tibial bypass for established gan­grene presents a challenging problem. In patients with gangrene of the toes (tissue necrosis) with patency of posterior tibial and peroneal artery, the preferential site of distal anastomosis is posterior tibial artery to provide maximal pulsatile ow to the foot. Perimalleolar bypasses (distal peroneal artery, distal posterior tibial artery, lateral plantar artery, and dorsalis pedis artery) are an important subset of infragenicular bypasses in patients with diabetes mellitus and renal failure. Autogenous vein should be used as the results with use of syn­thetic bypasses are poor. Patent ipsilateral super­cial femoral arteries/popliteal arteries without any signicant stenosis on arteriography are a satisfac­tory choice for proximal anastomosis as they per­mit the construction of a short bypass. Incidence of surgical site infection after lower extremity bypass has been reported to be between 4.8% and 18% [13]. Preoperative chlorhexidine showers, transverse groin incisions, and skip incisions (skin

References

Fig. 56.4 Follow-up arteriogram 1 year later with patent left femoral to posterior tibial in situ bypass
247
bridges) have a result in lower incidence of surgi­cal site infection. Other independent of surgical site infection include an ankle brachial index of less than 0.35, transfusion of more than two units of packed cells, and operative time of more than 220minutes [3]. Wiseman etal. from NSQIP data (2005–2012) reported incidence of surgical site infection of 2.1% in the hospital and incidence of
6.9% after discharge [1]. In patients with infected gangrene limited to distal portion of the foot (toes), we prefer amputation of the infected portion of the foot and perform arterial bypass a few days later. In patients with dry gangrene, arterial bypass and partial amputation of the foot/toes can be per­formed at the same setting.
References
1. Wiseman JT, Fernandes-Taylor S, Barnes ML, Saunders RS.Predictors of surgical site infection after hospital discharge in patients undergoing major vascu­lar surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62(4):1023–31.
2. Kalish JA, Farber A, Homa K.Factors associated with surgical site infection after lower extremity bypass in the society for vascular surgery, quality initiative. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60(5):1238–46.
3. Heckman KE, Michael E, Blay E, Helenowski IB, etal. Evidence based intervention for reducing surgi­cal site infection in lower extremity vascular bypass predictors. JACS. 2019;226(1):44–53.
Autogenous Composite Vein Bypass forRedo Infrainguinal Arterial Reconstruction
57
History andPhysical Examination
A 61-year-old female presented to the clinic in April 2018 with severe ischemic rest pain and night pain for the past 3 months. Medical comor­bidities included hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and nicotine abuse (80 pack years). Past surgical history included right femoral-popliteal in situ bypass (below the knee) for ischemic rest pain in January 2017 at an outside hospital. She also underwent left external iliac stent placement and a left femoral popliteal in situ bypass for symp-
toms of intermittent claudication in September
2017. In situ bypass occluded within 2 months of
its performance. She underwent thrombolysis with TPA and a balloon angioplasty of the distal anastomosis.
In April 2018, patient underwent arteriography
which revealed occluded left femoral- popliteal bypass, occlusion of the left supercial femoral and popliteal artery, with runoff with peroneal artery and anterior tibial artery supplying the left foot with a short segment stenosis of the anterior tibial artery in the proximal third (Fig.57.1).
Fig. 57.1 Preoperative arteriography showing occluded left femoral popliteal bypass with occlusion of left supercial
femoral and popliteal artery with runoff with anterior tibial and peroneal artery
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 S. S. Hans, Challenging Arterial Reconstructions, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44135-7_57
249
250
57 Autogenous Composite Vein Bypass forRedo Infrainguinal Arterial Reconstruction

Procedure

Following venous mapping she underwent left common femoral endarterectomy and a left fem­oral to mid anterior tibial bypass on May 24, 2018 using three composite segments of the vein. Initially patient was placed prone and both lesser saphenous veins were harvested. Right lesser saphenous vein in its entire length was adequate, but the left lesser saphenous vein was of adequate caliber in its distal segment only. Both posterior calf incisions were closed. Following this, with patient in supine position, the right greater saphenous vein was harvested from below the knee to the ankle. These three venous segments were sutured end to end (veno­venostomy). Proximal anastomosis was per­formed at the hood of the previously performed femoral-popliteal in situ bypass (occluded). This anastomosis was performed in an end-to-end fashion to the most proximal segment of the in situ bypass. The vein was kept in the subcutane­ous plane through skip incisions on the medial side, and tourniquet occlusion in the left thigh was performed after the valve lysis was done by passage of a retrograde valvulotome. Following tourniquet occlusion, incision was made in the mid anterolateral segment of the left lower leg, and between tibialis anterior tendon and an extensor hallucis longus tendon, anterior tibial artery was exposed. A tunnel was made in the interosseous membrane by crisscross inci­sion with a scalpel, and the composite vein bypass was brought through the interosseous membrane, and distal anastomosis was per­formed with 7-0 cardiovascular polypropylene. Completion arteriography showed narrowing just beyond the distal anastomosis (Fig. 57.2). However, patient had an excellent Doppler sig­nals in the dorsalis pedis artery; the narrowing was attributed to spasm.
Due to loss of signals in the foot, patient was re-explored 6 hours following initial procedure, and the distal anastomosis was disconnected, incision was made in the groin, skip incisions were opened, and thrombus was removed manu­ally with progressive gentle pressure between the thumb and forenger till pulsatile ow was
Fig. 57.2 Operative arteriogram showing distal portion
of the vein bypass through the interosseous membrane and anastomosed to anterior tibial artery. Narrowing of the artery just distal to the anastomosis
obtained. Since the vein was slightly redundant, a new anastomosis distal to the previous anastomo­sis in the anterior tibial artery was constructed with palpable pulses in the dorsalis pedis artery. Postoperative CTA showed patent femoral ante­rior tibial bypass (Fig. 57.3). Patient developed occlusion of the bypass in October 2018. Thrombolysis of the graft was started and the patency of the graft was established, but the entire graft had become extremely narrow, and it was felt that no further intervention should be performed as patient had marked improvement in her symptoms (relief of ischemic rest pain) and her ankle brachial index is 0.4. Patient had stopped nicotine abuse and is currently on low­dose aspirin and clopidogrel.

Discussion

Redo lower extremity arterial bypass of the saphenous vein is the most effective method of revascularization after failed primary bypass [1]. Endovascular intervention in anatomically suit­able lesions is an acceptable alternative to bypass in patients who would require synthetic conduit. DeFrang et al. reported 85 arterial bypass
Invited Commentary fromNicolas J.Mouawad, MD MPH MBA FSVS FACS FRCS RPVI
Fig. 57.3 Postoperative CTA showing patent femoral anterior tibial artery bypass
251
procedures using arm vein (32%), spliced vein (16%), lesser saphenous vein (2%), contralateral greater saphenous vein (14%), prosthetic graft (16%), and composite graft (prosthetic and vein, 5%). They reported mean time to failure from the rst bypass of 24months. They observed pri­mary patency at 4 years of 79.8% [1].
Biancari etal. reported 51 reconstructions to the infrapopliteal arteries for critical limb isch­emia and reported a primary patency of 44% at 1 year with vein graft and with prosthetic graft plus arteriovenous stula of 67% and prosthetic graft without arteriovenous stula of 17% [2]. Conrad et al. reported long-term results of catheter- directed thrombolysis to treat acutely occluded infrainguinal bypass graft occlusion in 69 patients (48 vein grafts, 21 prosthetic). They reported successful lysis in 71% of cases. They identied causative lesion and its treatment by angioplasty or limited operative revision in 33 patients [3]. They observed (like the patient in this report) diffuse intimal hyperplasia in few patients and did not offer any further interven­tion in patients with diffuse intimal hyperplastic lesions. It is possible that injury to the intima during preparation of the composite graft, and more likely from thrombectomy performed in
the immediate postoperative period, resulted in diffuse hyperplasia.
Invited Commentary fromNicolas J.Mouawad, MD MPH MBA FSVS FACS FRCS RPVI
Lower extremity arterial reconstruction in the absence of satisfactory single segment autoge­nous great saphenous vein remains very chal­lenging in contemporary vascular surgical practice. In fact, the high incidence of endove­nous ablative procedures as well as continued harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting in an era of increasing prevalence of peripheral arterial disease and reoperative infrainguinal bypass sur­gery really relegates the vascular surgeon to novel, complicated (and time-consuming) options of conduit creation.
Although prosthetic and biologic options are available, autogenous solutions are always more favorable, particularly for distal infrapopliteal tar­gets in the setting of critical limb ischemia. Harvesting of contralateral great saphenous, bilat­eral small saphenous, and even upper extremity veins in addition to splicing multiple segments to