Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_905_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
32 Мб
Скачать
27 Stanley J Dudrick: A Life of a Giant in Surgery and Surgical Decision to Transition to a New Role or No…
333
3. Dudrick SJ, Drick S.Longterm total parenteral nutri­tion with growth in puppies and positive nitrogen bal­ance in patient. Surg Forum. 1967;18:356–7.
4. Dudrick SJ. Rhoads Lecture: a 45-year obsession and passionate pursuit of optimal nutrition support: puppies, pediatrics, surgery, geriatrics, home TPN, A.S.P.E.N., et cetera. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2005;29(4):272–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607
105029004272.
5. Dudrick SJ.History of parenteral nutrition. J Am Coll Nutr. 2009;28(3):243–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/073
15724.2009.10719778.
6. Dudrick SJ, Lati R.Total parenteral nutrition in sur­gery current status. Contemp Surg. 1992;41:41–8.
7. Dudrick SJ, Lati R, Adams PR.Arrest and reversal of atherosclerosis with parenteral nutrition. Surg Clin NA. 1991;71(3):665–75. PMID 1904650.
8. Dudrick SJ, Lati R, Fosnocht D. Management of the short bowel syndrome. Surg Clin NA. 1991;71(3):625–43.
9. Dudrick SJ, Lati R, Schrager R.Nutritional manage­ment of inammatory bowel disease. Surg Clin NA. 1991;71(3):609–23.
10. Lati R, McIntosh J, Dudrick SJ. Nutritional sup­port in acute and chronic pancreatitis. Surg Clin NA. 1991;71(3):579–95. PMID 1904645.
11. Lati R, Killam R, Dudrick SJ. Nutritional support in liver failure. Surg Clin NA. 1991;71(3):567–478.
12. Gould KL, Martucci JP, Goldberg DI, Hess MJ, Lati R, Dudrick SJ.Short term cholesterol lowering decreases size and severity of perfusion abnormalities by positron emission tomography after dipyridamole in patients with coronary artery disease: a potential noninvasive marker of healing coronary endothelium. Circulation. 1994;89(4):1530–8. PMID 8149518.
13. Dudrick SJ, Lati R.Total parenteral nutrition part II: administration, monitoring and complications. Pract Gastroenterol. 1992;16(7):29–38.
14. Dudrick SJ, Lati R. Total parenteral nutrition part I: indications and techniques. Pract Gastroenterol. 1992;16(6):21–9.
15. Lati R, Dudrick SJ, editors. The biology and prac­tice of current nutrition support. 2nd ed. Landes Bioscience: Georgetown; 2003.
16. DeMaria EJ, Lati R, Sugerman HJ, editors. Laparoscopic bariatric surgery: techniques and out­comes. Landes Bioscience: Georgetown; 2002.
17. Lati R, Dudrick SJ, editors. Current surgical nutri­tion. Georgetown: R.G.Landes; 1996.
18. Dudrick SJ, Pimiento JM, Lati R. Short bowel syndrome: a clinical update. In: Lati R, editor. Surgery of complex abdominal wall defects: practi­cal approaches. Cham: Springer International; 2017. p.225–42.
19. Lati R, Dudrick S, Merrell R. The new surgeon: patient-centered, disease-focused, technology-driven, and team-oriented. In: Technological advances in sur­gery, trauma, and critical care. NewYork: Springer;
2015.
20. Dudrick S, Pimiento J, Lati R. Short bowel syn­drome: a clinical update. In: Lati R, editor. Surgery of complex abdominal wall defects. Springer Science+ Business Media NewYork; 2013.
21. Lati R, Dudrick SJ, Perch PG.Nutritional manage­ment of chronic pancreatitis: current concepts. In: Lati R, Dudrick SJ, editors. The biology and practice of current nutritional support. 2nd ed. Georgetown: Landes Bioscience; 2003. p.334–45.
22. Lati R, SJ, Dudrick SJ. Nutrition support in acute pancreatitis. In: Lati R, Dudrick SJ, editors. The biology and practice of current nutritional support. 2nd ed. Georgetown: Landes Bioscience; 2003. p.320–33.
23. Dudrick SJ, Fizan A, Lati R.Nutritional and meta­bolic management of short bowel syndrome. In: Lati R, Dudrick SJ, editors. The biology and practice of current nutritional support. 2nd ed. Georgetown: Landes Bioscience; 2003. p.261–74.
24. Lati R, Dudrick SJ.Total parenteral nutrition: cur­rent concepts and practice. In: Lati R, Dudrick SJ, editors. The biology and practice of current nutritional support. 2nd ed. Georgetown: Landes Bioscience;
2003. p.208–18.
25. Horowitz D, Lati R.Radiologic assessment of nutri­tional and metabolic status. In: Lati R, Dudrick SJ, editors. The biology and practice of current nutritional support. 2nd ed. Georgetown: Landes Bioscience;
2003. p.181–91.
26. Lanning DA, Lati R. Wound healing: the role of nutrient substrates. In: Lati R, Dudrick SJ, editors. The biology and practice of current nutritional sup­port. 2nd ed. Georgetown: Landes Bioscience; 2003. p.88–102.
27. Azimuddin K, Lati R, Ivatury RR.Acute phase pro­teins: the utility in nutrition support of critically ill patients. In: Lati R, Dudrick SJ, editors. The biol­ogy and practice of current nutritional support. 2nd ed. Georgetown: Landes Bioscience; 2003. p.63–71.
28. Lati R, Azimuddin K.Biochemistry of amino acids: clinical implications. In: Lati R, Dudrick SJ, editors. The biology and practice of current nutritional sup­port. 2nd ed. Georgetown: Landes Bioscience; 2003. p.52–62.
29. Dudrick SJ, Lati R, Castro GA. Digestion and absorption. In: O’Leary JP, editor. The physiologic basis of surgery. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1996. p.365–75.
30. Mason GR, Kahrilas PJ, Otterson MF, Lang IM, Telford GL, Telford SW, Sarna KS, Cowles VE, Koch TR, Debas HT, Gittes G, Jaffe M, Dudrick SJ, Lati R, Castro GA. The digestive system. In: O’Leary JP, editor. The physiologic basis of surgery. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1996. p.406–40.
31. Dudrick SJ, Zarif A, Lati R.Nutritional and meta­bolic Management of Short Bowel Syndrome. In: Lati R, Dudrick SJ, editors. Current surgical nutrition. R.G.Landes and Chapman & Hall; 1996. p.309–17.
334
R. Lati
32. Anain PM, Matarese LE, Lati R, Steiger E. Home parenteral nutrition in patients with gastrointestinal tract failure. In: Lati R, Dudrick SJ, editors. Current surgical nutrition. R.G.Landes and Chapman & Hall;
1996. p.297–308.
33. Lati R, Burns GA, Dudrick SJ. Nutritional sup­port of chronic pancreatitis. In: Lati R, Dudrick SJ, editors. Current surgical nutrition. R.G. Landes and Chapman & Hall; 1996. p.243–54.
34. Lati R, Dudrick SJ.Nutrition support of acute pan­creatitis. In: Lati R, Dudrick SJ, editors. Current surgical nutrition. R.G.Landes and Chapman & Hall;
1996. p.229–42.
35. Lati R, Dudrick SJ.Total parenteral nutrition: cur­rent concepts and indications. In: Lati R, Dudrick SJ, editors. Current surgical nutrition. R.G. Landes and Chapman & Hall; 1996. p.45–56.
36. Horowitz DR, Lati R. Radiological assessment of nutritional and metabolic status. In: Lati R, Dudrick SJ, editors. Current surgical nutrition. R.G. Landes and Chapman & Hall; 1996. p.33–43.
37. Lati R, Dudrick SJ.Effects of nutrients in acute pan­creatitis. In: Lati R, Dudrick SJ, editors. Surgical nutrition: strategies in critically ill patients. Springer­Verlag, R.G.Landes; 1995. p.147–51.
38. Dudrick SJ, Lati R. Amino acids in critically ill patients. In: Lati R, Dudrick SJ, editors. Surgical nutrition: strategies in critically ill patients. Springer­Verlag, R.G.Landes; 1995. p.31–43.
39. Dudrick SJ, Lati R. Management of Patients with short bowel syndrome. In: Kirby DF, Dudrick SJ, editors. Practical handbook in clinical practice. CRC Press; 1994. p.215–26.
40. Dudrick SJ, Lati R. Total parenteral nutrition. In: Kirby DF, Dudrick SJ, editors. Practical handbook in clinical practice. CRC Press; 1994. p.135–64.
41. Lati R, Dudrick SJ.Nutrition in surgical patients. In: Kirby DF, Dudrick SJ, editors. Practical handbook in clinical practice. CRC Press; 1994. p.165–82.
42. Lati R, Dudrick SJ.Hepatic encephalopathy: nutri­tion and metabolic implications of amino acids. In: Lati R, editor. Amino acids in critical care and can­cer. Austin: R.G.Landes Publishing Company; 1994. p.125–36.
43. Dudrick SJ, Lati R. Nutritional support: general principles, indications, and techniques. In: Quigley EMM, Sorrell MF, editors. The gastrointestinal sur­gical patient: preoperative and postoperative care. Baltimore: William & Wilkins; 1994.
44. Dudrick SJ, Lati R. Surgery and nutrition in the elderly. In: O’Donnell P, editor. Geriatric urology. St. Louis: Mosby; 1993. p.105–13.
45. Dudrick SJ, Lati R, Castro GA. Digestion and absorption. In: O’Leary JP, editor. The physiologic basis of surgery. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins;
1993. p.365–75.
46. Mason GR, Kahrilas PJ, Otterson MF, Lang IM, Telford GL, Telford SW, Sarna KS, Cowles VE, Koch
TR, Debas HT, Gittes G, Jaffe M, Dudrick SJ, Lati R, Castro GA.The digestive system. In: O’Leary JP, editor. The physiologic basis of surgery. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1993. p.340–75.
47. Dudrick SJ, Lati R.Total parenteral nutrition in the treatment of atherosclerosis. In: Van Way III CW, edi­tor. Handbook of surgical nutrition. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1992. p.259–71.
48. Dudrick SJ, Adams PR, Englert DM, Lati R, Feste A.Arrest and regression of atherosclerosis by intra­venous infusion of specially formulated nutrient sub­strates. In: Takehiko T, Akira O, editors. Nutritional support in organ failure. Amsterdam/New York/ Oxford: Elsevier; 1990.

Further Readings

Bhatt NR, Morris M, O’Neil A, Gillis A, Ridgway
PF. When should surgeons retire? Br J Surg. 2016;103(1):35–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9925. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
Gotlib Conn L, Wright FC.Retirement plans and perspec-
tives among general surgeons: a qualitative assess­ment. Can J Surg. 2018;61(5):319–25. https://doi.
org/10.1503/cjs.011217. PMID: 30246991; PMCID:
PMC6153102.
Anteby R, Sinyard RD 3rd, Healy MG, Warshaw AL,
Hodin R, Ellison EC, Phitayakorn R.Passing the scal­pel: lessons on retirement planning from retired aca­demic surgeons. Am J Surg. 2022;224(1 Pt A):166–71.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.11.025. Epub
2021 Nov 29.
Flint L, Scott-Conner CE. What constitutes a success-
ful retirement? Invited commentary on: Anteby and coauthors, passing the scalpel: lessons on retirement planning from retired academic surgeons. Am J Surg. 2022;224(1 Pt A):172–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
amjsurg.2022.01.001. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
Buckley R. How do trauma surgeons retire with grace?
Injury. 2023;54(10):110999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
injury.2023.110999. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
Buccimazza I.When should surgeons retire? S Afr J Surg.
2016;54(4):3–4.
Hewitt L, Ashford B. Career reections of retired sur-
geons. ANZ J Surg. 2023;93(1–2):21–3. https://doi.
org/10.1111/ans.18173. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
Stolarski A, Moseley JM, O’Neal P, Whang E, Kristo
G. Retired surgeons’ reections on their careers. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(4):359–61. https://doi.
org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.5476. PMID: 31968054;
PMCID: PMC6990937.
Kim NE, Moseley JM, O’Neal P, Whang E, Itani KMF,
Kristo G. Retired surgeons as mentors for surgical training graduates entering practice: an underutilized resource. Ann Surg. 2021;273(3):613–7. https://doi.
org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003272.
Part V
The Final Word
Epilogue: Quo Vadis Surgical
28
Decision-Making
RifatLati
“In a surgeon (Foreword to: Marx Thorek. Surgical Errors and Safeguards, Fourth edition, Philadelphia: J.B.Lippincott Company; 1943.), there is no quality of mind more to be desired than that of judgment. It is judgment even more than skill that makes him truly a successful surgeon.”
Hugh Devine, 19431.

Introduction

In this epilogue as the concluding chapter of this book on Surgical Decision-Making: Evidence and Beyond, Second Edition, I want to remind the reader one more time, the profound impact that these decisions have on the lives of our patients, and frankly in our own lives as surgeons as well. Each page of every chapter of this book, each case presented and analyzed, and each insight shared by the authors have deepened our understanding and brought us closer to the nuances and dynamic nature of surgical decision-making.
As we reect on the myriad factors that inu­ence surgical decision-making, it becomes clear that it is not merely a matter of following guide-
R. Lati (*) Department of Surgery, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
Tucson Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Tucson, AZ, USA e-mail: Lati@surgery.arizona.edu
lines or protocols, or check list. It is a delicate dance between art and science, a harmonious blend of technical prociency and human com­passion. Moreover, it is a culmination of experi­ence, intuition, education, and unwavering dedication to patient care that forms the founda­tion upon which these critical decisions are made. These decisions, however, in case of emergencies and when things are seemingly out of control, are not always understandable by the team, and only the surgeon may be able to explain the decision, although not all the time.
Through the exploration of real-life scenarios and review of the evidence in each chapter of this book, and often real-life practices described by authors, I am hoping that collectively as a group of surgeons, interested in surgical decision­making, we have advanced the understanding of this complex process and further uncovered the inherent complexities and challenges that sur­geons face in the decision-making process. In doing so, this book reviews the role of and the evolution of surgical practices, through advance­ments in technology, and the shifting paradigms that shape our approach to patient care.
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024 R. Lati (ed.), Surgical Decision-Making, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67391-7_28
337
338
R. Lati
But let me warn you the reader: if you were expecting to completely grasp how surgical­making decision by the conclusion of this book, you may nd that you are not completely satis­ed [1]. Although we have delved into various aspects of this intricate topic, there are still many unknowns that necessitate further research. This research should be conducted by surgeons work­ing together with experts who specialize in understanding the mind, brain function, and methods for inuencing or training the brain.
In his book “Modern Surgery” published as a second edition in late 1939, Professor Max Thorek, the founder of International College of Surgeons, quotes the renowned English surgeon Lord Moynihan in the rst chapter titled “The Surgeon and his Art.”
Surgery is not only a matter of operating skill-
fully. It must engage in its service qualities of mind
and heart that raise it to the very highest pinnacle
of human endeavor. A patient can offer you no
higher tribute than to entrust you with his life and
his health, and by implication, with the happiness
of all his family. To be worthy of this trust we must
submit for a lifetime to the constant discipline of
unwearied effort in the search of knowledge, and
most reverent devotion to every detail in every
operation that we perform [24].
Professor Thorek continues his chapter with:
“ There is no human calling which demands from
those who follow it a greater endowment of the
best human qualities and the highest developments
of technical knowledge and skill than art of sur-
gery.” Further, he writes “On the other hand, the
surgeon’s judgment, knowledge and skill may save
a life otherwise doomed; Erroneous or careless
surgical procedures may and often do bring either
death or life-long misery to a patient who has had
a comparatively easily corrected condition” [2].
I should add to these beautifully written words, that should guide every surgeon, that avoiding carelessness and adventurous surgical behavior is a must for every surgeon, every stu­dent of surgery, every member of the surgical team, irrespective the stage of their surgical life. The only way to do so, it is for us surgeons to be prepared well, have utmost respect for every pro­cedure, and know everything that is to know about the patient, including past surgical history, the anatomy (often distorted from previous pro-
cedures), physiology and patients state of mind, and patient’s wishes and goals of end-of-life.
After thoroughly studying Thorek’s compre­hensive insights, I have come to appreciate more the complexity and signicance of surgery, which has long been regarded as one of the noblest arts. While surgical decision-making has evolved over the years, maintaining respect for the patient, dis­ease, and procedures, as well as a commitment to continuous improvement, remains constant. The inherent complexity of making surgical decisions is deeply ingrained in the hearts, minds, and their beings of surgeons.
The methods of surgical decision-making in the present day differ from those used in the past, with technological advancements revolu­tionizing the eld of medicine and surgery. The convergence of surgeon intuition, creativity, and knowledge and comfort with cutting-edge medi­cal technologies has led to a signicant transfor­mation in the practice of surgery. Innovations such as laparoscopy, robotics, nanotechnology, genetics, virtual reality, and bioengineering have reshaped the surgical landscape, empower­ing patients to actively engage in their own healthcare and achieve better outcomes. As a result, hospitals have adapted to support these advancements, and surgeons have embraced a patient- centered, disease-focused, technology­driven, and collaborative approach to healthcare [5, 6].
However, despite the various considerations discussed in this book, the ultimate decisions regarding whether to operate, when to operate, and which approach to take rely solely on the sur­geon, and it is a complex interplay of experience of the surgeon, intuition, education, training, exposure, and the surgeon’s commitment to pro­viding the best possible care for the patient.
When evaluating the advancements in tech­nology across the spectrum, it is evident that sur­gical outcomes have improved, leading to reduced morbidity and mortality rates and a higher quality of life for patients. However, at its essence, surgical decision-making transcends mere evidence-based explanations; it lies at the heart of being a surgeon. It involves blending technical expertise with a relentless drive to heal
28 Epilogue: Quo Vadis Surgical Decision-Making
339
patients and a constant willingness to question and evaluate our own actions.
It is crucial for surgeons to recognize that not every decision made will be correct, and it is essential to acknowledge and learn from mistakes when they occur. True surgical competence involves an ongoing process of self-reection and a willingness to continuously strive for improvement.
To quote again Professor Max Thorek: “To
fail to admit one’s mistakes is to block prog­ress; an honest declaration of error is the rst step toward its correction. In this age of coop­eration in the science of healing, the surgeon who fears loss of prestige through acknowledg­ment of fault violates not only faith to himself, but also unjust to his calling” [7].
Acknowledging potential mistakes in decision­making can undoubtedly lead us to discover new approaches when caring for future patients. Most importantly, will teach the new genera­tions of surgeons dealing with our own errors, and learn from such mistakes.
Ultimately, we aspire for this collaborative effort to motivate others to focus their research endeavors on this subject. Particularly, experi­enced surgeons should strive to elucidate their decision-making processes more effectively. Integrating discussions on decision-making into surgical planning and team debriengs could be a valuable practice for every surgeon, as advocated by the senior author of this chapter.
As I reect on the conclusion of this journey that began several years ago, the decision to embark on the creation of the second edition of this book lls me with a sense of hope and renewed creativity. On a very personal note, among >20 book manuscripts I have been involved with over the years, this one stands out as the pinnacle of my satisfaction. Instead of experiencing fatigue, I found myself energized
and genuinely delighted with the nal result. I hope that this book has ignited a spark of curios­ity and reection in our readers, prompting them to delve deeper into the intricacies of surgical decision-making. May it serve as a catalyst for further research, dialogue, and collaboration among surgeons, educators, and healthcare pro­fessionals, driving us toward excellence and innovation in the eld of surgery.
In closing, I extend my gratitude to all those who have contributed to this collective effort and to the patients who entrust us with their care. The journey of surgical decision-making is a continu­ous one, marked by challenges, triumphs, and opportunities for growth, an often with disap­pointments, that we never forget, but learn from. Let us embrace this journey with humility, com­passion, and a steadfast commitment to providing the best possible care for those who place their trust in our hands.

References

1. Lati R, Lati F.Final thoughts on surgical decision-
making. In: Lati R, editor. Surgical decision making-
beyond the evidence based surgery. Springer; 2016.
2. Thorek M. Modern surgery. Philadelphia: J. P.
Lippincott; 1939. Groves EW. The life and work of
Moynihan. Br Med J 1940;1(4136):601–606.
3. Groves EW.The life and work of Moynihan. Br Med
J. 1940;1(4136):601–6.
4. Groves EW. The life and work of Moynihan: part
II.Br Med J. 1940;1(4137):649–51.
5. Lati R, editor. The modern hospital. Patient centered,
disease based, research oriented, technology driven.
Switzerland AG: Springer Nature; 2019.
6. Lati R, Dudrick SJ, Merrell CR. The new surgeon:
patient-centered, disease-focused, technology-
driven, and team-oriented. In: Lati R, etal., editors.
Technological advances in surgery, trauma and critical
care. New York: Springer Science+Business Media;
2015.
7. Thorek M. Surgical errors and safeguards. 4th ed.
Philadelphia: J.B.Lippincott; 1943.

Index

A
Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS), 277 Abdominal catastrophe, 164 Abdominal closure, 75 Abdominal compartment syndrome, 76 Abdominal injuries, 280, 281 Abdominal wall reconstruction, 140, 141, 151 Abdominal wound contamination, 151 Abdominal wound dehiscence, 106, 122 Academic medicine and surgery, 324 Academic or group practice, 305 ACAS (Atherosclerosis Carotid Artery Study), 253 Acceptance, 302, 303 Acidosis, 134 Acquired coagulopathy of trauma, 134 Active surgical practice, 327 Acute abdominal distention and worsening sepsis, 230 Acute aortic dissection (AAD), 246, 248 Acute blood loss anemia, 72 Acute care surgery
emergency surgery, 105 management of intraoperative surprises, 126–129
surgical emergency care, 105 Acute fracture xation in polytraumatized patients, 85 Acute kidney injury (AKI), 72
etiology, 73
progression, 72 Acute liver failure, 88 Acute mesenteric ischemia, 230 Acute pancreatitis (AP), 203–207, 209 Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II
(APACHE II) classication system, 204 Acute Physiology Score (APS), 97 Acute postoperative wound dehiscence, 107 Acute renal failure in trauma cohorts, 87, 88 Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), 25, 44 Acute Stanford Type A dissection, 246 Acute stress, 43 Acute surgical rectal cancer emergencies, 235 Acute thrombotic MTS, 266 Acute traumatic coagulopathy, 84, 134 Acute type B aortic dissection (aTBAD), 246 Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, 209 Acute wound dehiscence, 96
Advanced imaging technologies, 3, 4, 161 Advanced neuromonitoring techniques, 280 Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS)
guidelines, 277, 282
protocol, 278 Age-based criteria, 319 Age discrimination, 317, 323 Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) in
1986, 323 Age-related mandatory retirement, 319 Aggressive blood product replacement with fresh frozen
plasma, 134 Aging, 319 Aging surgeons
behavior, 318
performance, 318, 321 AI algorithms, 5 Air Algerie MD83; EC-LTV, 49 Airlines, safety, 50 Airway-breathing-circulation, 279 Airway management, 278 AKI, see Acute kidney injury (AKI) Alcohol
consumption and surgeons, 45, 46
and sleep deprivation, 46
on surgical decision making, 25 Alpha Omega Alpha status, 50 ALPPS procedure, see Associating liver partition and
portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy
(ALPPS) procedure Alveolar bone, 294, 295 Alveolar process, 292 AMA report, 322 Ambiguous genitalia, 165, 166 American Association for the Surgery of Trauma
(AAST), 214, 216, 308
of solid organ injuries, 281 American Board of Surgery, 323 American Cancer Society, 233 American College of Surgeons, 21, 35, 323 American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma
guidelines, 84, 282
American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality
Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP), 59, 94
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024 R. Lati (ed.), Surgical Decision-Making, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67391-7
341
342
Index
American College of Surgeons Surgical Risk Calculator
(ACS-SRC), 59, 60 American Medical Association, 321, 323 American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA), 59, 206 American Surgical Association, 6 Anastomotic leak, 236 Anesthesia risks, 160 Angioembolization, 84 Angiographic embolization, 184 ANN model, see Articial neural network (ANN) model Anorectal malformations (ARMs), 162 Anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), 45 Anterior component separation (ACS) technique for
abdominal wall reconstruction, 150 Antibiotic therapy, 111 Antimicrobial therapy, 293 Aortic angioplasty for immediate aortic remodeling in
STABLIZE technique, 249 Aortic false lumen patency status, preoperative
imaging, 250 Aortic remodeling after STABILIZE technique, 252 Aortic valve replacement, 230 Applied ergonomics, 318 Archives of Surgery, 21 Area Under the Curve (AUC), 58 Arterial bleeding, 139 Arterial emboli, 115 Arteriotomy, 255 Articial intelligence (AI), 4, 5, 18, 270
and computer programming in the airline industry, 16 denition, 58 developments, 16 models, 5 non-linear properties, 57
Articial neural network (ANN) model, 62, 65
accuracy, 64 incidental portal-venous phase CT, 65 lymph node metastasis, 65
predictive ANN model, 64 ASA score, see American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Assessment of cognitive functions, 320 Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for
staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) procedure, 200
stage 1 with reconstruction of left portal vein, 201 Attention and memory processes, 43 ATTRACT trial, 267 Attrition among pilot trainees, 50 Augmented reality (AR) during surgery, 58 Aviation program, 50 Aviation Selection Test Battery (ASTB), 51 Aviators based on performance under psychological
stress, 51
Avulsion, 292
B
Band erosion, 180 Band slippage, 179, 180 Bariatric surgery, 185
benets, 179
complications, 179 nutritional deciencies, 179
population, 94 Baseline imaging evaluation, 250 Bayes, Thomas, 223 Bedside assessments and human intuition in decision-
making process, 5 Bedside exploratory laparotomies, 75 Bedside index for severity and acute pancreatitis
(BISAP) score, 204 Bedside therapeutic interventions, 74 Behavior, information-gathering type, 44 Bilateral craniectomy, 136, 137 Bile duct injuries, 212 Bile duct misidentication, 35 Bile duct reconstructive procedures, 198 Biliary-pancreatic injuries, 138 Biologic mesh reinforcement, 123 Bladder exstrophy and epispadias complex, 169 Bone and joint integrity, 167 Botulinum toxin A (BTA), 149 Brain structures, 20, 44 Branch vessel wire protection and stenting after
completion of aortic remodeling, 252 Breathing, 278 Burnout, 22, 307
causes, 310 consequences, 311 and COVID-19 pandemic, 309 and depression, 310 medical students and residents, 308 phenomenon, 308 prevention in surgeons, 311, 312 signs and symptoms, 310 vs. stress, 308, 309
in surgeons, 309 Burnout syndrome, 307 Burst abdomen, 122, 123
C
CAB (circulation-airway-breathing), 279 Calcied left iliac arterial system, 262 Cancer in elderly patient, 172 Cardiac output (CO), 71 Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), 73 Carotid endarterectomy
activated clotting time, 255
aggressive retraction, 255
brain physiology, 254
versus carotid artery stenting, 245
cerebral blood ow, 254
continuous EEG monitoring, 254
embolization of atheromatous debris, 255
external jugular vein, 255
historical perspective, 253
post-operative care, 254
preoperative imaging studies, 254
recurrent laryngeal nerve, 255
regional anesthesia, 254
Index
343
regional cervical block, 254 stump pressure, 254
unclamping sequence, 255 Catecholamines, 43 Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), 267 CAVENT trial, 267 Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience
(CAWR), 146 The Checklist Manifesto, 31 Chest trauma, 282 Child-Pugh (CPT) classication, 210 Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy, 194 Cholangiocarcinoma, 195 Cholecystectomy, 209
in cirrhotic patients, 210 with Mirrizi syndrome, 35
timing, 211 Cholecystostomy, tubes, 211 Choledocholithiasis, 210, 211 Chronic post-dissection TAAA, 249 Chronic thrombotic MTS, 267 Circulation, 278, 279 Civilian trauma management, 279 Clinical cognition, 320 Clinical complexity in pediatric surgical patients, 161 Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic stula
(CR-POPF), 61 Clinical patient care, 226 Cloacal exstrophy or persistent cloaca, 168 Clot maceration, 266 ClotTriever catheter, 267 ClotTriever device, 267 ClotTriever procedure, 267 Cognitive processes, 53 Cognitive robots, 64 Cognitive task survey, 37 Colon and rectal malignancies
emergency management
acute surgical indications, 233 adjuvant treatment strategies, 235 anastomotic leaks on local recurrence, 236 cancer-related mortality, 233 circulating tumor DNA in recurrence detection
and treatment guidance, 236
clinical obstruction or perforation, 235 closed-loop obstruction, 239 comprehensive care, 234 diagnostic and therapeutic process, 234 evidence-based interventions, 234 extended or multivisceral resections, 234 extracolonic or metastatic lesions, 234 intraoperative complications, 235 intraoperative necessity, 234 lifetime risk, 233 management of acute complications, 242 medical specialties, 236 mid-transverse colon mass, 240 multimodal therapy, 235 neoadjuvant therapy, 235 oncologic integrity, 236
oncologic outcome, 235 optimal resection margin, 235 patient care, 235 patient prognosis, 234 physiological insult, 235 postoperative evaluation, 234 preoperative treatment protocols, 235 preventive measures and early intervention
strategies, 234 proximal and distal transection, 235 quality of life, 235 resection or palliative measures, 235 screening efforts and lifestyle modications, 233 side-to-end anastomosis, 240 sphincter preservation, 235 stent placement, 242 surgical intervention, 235 surgical morbidity and mortality rates, 233–234 surgical, oncologic, and supportive care
strategies, 236 synchronous lesions, 234 treatment approach, 234 tumor removal and functional outcomes, 235 tumor resection, 235
Colon cancer, oncologic resection, 237–239 Colonic stenting, 241 Colorectal liver metastasis, 195 Colorectal surgeries, 4 Common bile duct exploration for stones and iatrogenic
enterotomy, 118
Common bile duct (CBD) injuries, 120, 212 Communication during surgery, 197 Communication dynamics, 54 Compensatory mechanisms, 320 Complex abdominal wall defect, surgical
management, 146
Complex or rare congenital anomalies, 169 Complex surgical procedures, 37 Complicated appendicitis, 164 Complicated inguinal hernias, 164, 165 Complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs), 111 Component separation techniques, 150 Comprehension, 53 Computer programming in airline industry, 16 Concomitant injuries, 292 Concussion, 290 Congenital diaphragmatic hernia, 169 Continuous ICU monitoring, 75 Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), 73
central vascular access, 73
types, 73 Continuous venovenous hemodialtration (CVVHDF), 73 Continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD), 73 Continuous venovenous hemoltration (CVVH), 73 Contusions or minor injuries, 214 Convolutional neural network (CNN), 65 Coping strategies, 304, 305 Coronary artery bypass procedure, 330 COVID-19 and aspiration pneumonia, 73 Craniofacial malformations, 169
344
Index
Creativity in complex surgical procedures, 18 Critical illness on gut function, 77 Crown fractures, 296 CRRT, see Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) Crystalloid resuscitation, 134 Cystic lesion in pancreatic head, 200
D
Damage control
for abdominal catastrophes and sepsis, 141 concepts and techniques, 133
in vascular surgery, 139 Damage control laparotomy (DCL), 138, 139, 279, 280 Damage control on demand, 149 Damage-control open cavity approach to hemostasis and
source control, 69 Damage control orthopedics (DCO) concepts, 139, 283 Damage control surgery (DCS), 85, 97, 116
abbreviated laparotomy, 134 abdominal closure, 134 acute abdominal compartment syndrome, 135 complete denitive surgery, 135 decision making–process, 133 direct peritoneal resuscitation, 133 embolization, 133 during emergency resuscitative thoracotomy, 137 hemodynamic instability, 135 indications, 135 initial evaluation and management, 134 intra-abdominal hemorrhage, 135 lethal diamond, 133 long-term recovery, 133 management, 133
of severely injured patients, 134 multiple or complex injuries, 135 patient’s physiology, 133 physiological deterioration, 137 physiological exhaustion, 137 prolonged hypotension, 134 prolonged surgery time, 135 resuscitation strategies, 134 soft tissue damage, 135 surgical practice, 133 surgical procedure, 133 temporary mobilization for severe bone fractures, 133 in thoracic trauma, 137, 138 trauma induced hypocalcemia, 133
Damage control surgery in thoracic trauma (DCTS), 137 Data analytics, 4 Data collection process, 5 Data-driven strategic timing of uid administration and
removal, 70 da Vinci Surgical System, 3 DCS, see Damage control surgery (DCS) Decision making process, 159, 330
analysis concepts, 53 around surgical critical care, 86–88 in general surgery, 222–224 identical pathway or algorithm, 316
misadventures, 316 operative errors, 316 pathologic situation, 317 surgical management, 316 in survivors of MOF, 88
therapeutic plan, 316 Decision-tree diagrams, 33 Decompressive craniectomy (DC), 136, 280
combined with standard care, 136 Deep learning (DL), 58 Denitive abdominal wall reconstruction, 149, 150
surgical decision making-process
clinical entity, 145 continuum of care, 146 disciplined protocols, 145 intestinal obstruction, 146 itinerary surgeon, 145 management, 145 outside surgical dogma or box, 145 postoperative restulization, 146 surgical approach, 145
well-planned surgical strategy, 145 Denitive (injury repair) operation, 140 Denitive reconstruction technique, 146, 147 Delaying surgery, 146 Dental hard tissues, 293, 294 Dentoalveolar trauma
analytic classication, 290 classication system, 290 decision making, 289 denitive treatment during emergency, 289 emergency management, 293 etiologies, 289 principles, 293 surgical decision making, 289 types of facial trauma, 289
DENTOSAFE (Dental Rescue Box for Storing Tooth or
Tooth Fragments), 294 Denver group, 84 Denver score, 83 Dialysis, 72 Difcult cholecystectomy, 118–120 Difcult gallbladder, management, 209, 210 Difcult hernia repair, 125, 126 Digital decision support systems (DSS), 4 Direct patient care, 301 Direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR), 75, 76, 116 Disability status, patients, 279 Discretionary procedure, 227 Discrimination against the elderly, 319 Dislocated teeth, repositioning, 294 Disrupt BTK study, 263 DISRUPT PAD I and II, 261 DISRUPT PAD III observational study, 262, 263 DISRUPT PAD III RCT and OS trials, 262, 263 Dissection stenting, 247 Distal esophageal pouches, 163 Distal pancreatectomy, 215 Distal transection, 240 Diverting loop ileostomy, 240