Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4507_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
34 Мб
Скачать
20 Retraction Pockets andAdhesive Otitis Media
Fig. 20.8 Adhesive otitis media in the left ear. M mallues, I Incus, S Stapes, P Promontorium
419
Signicant conductive hearing loss and recurrent infections mandate surgery. Surgical options include elevation of the TM from the medial wall of the middle ear, support with a cartilage graft, and insertion of a ventilation tube by punctur­ing the cartilage graft. The aim is to improve hearing and to obtain self-cleaning ear canal skin. Success rates of up to 80% have been reported with this method [32].
There is no need for treatment in stable patients without signicant hearing loss. Hearing aids may be a good option for patients with only hearing loss no recurrent discharge and no suspected cholesteatoma. However, with the use of hearing aids, ventilation in the external auditory canal may deteriorate and humidity may increase. Thus, the frequency of recurrent infections may increase.
The main goals of surgical treatment are to carefully remove all adherent epithe­lium from the posterior and medial wall, strengthen the atrophic membrane with perichondrium and cartilage, provide a self-cleaning surface for the TM epithelium, and properly ventilate the middle ear. The most difcult steps in these procedures are the removal of the epithelium from the ossicular chain, over the round window, and the sinuses in the posterior tympanic cavity. During these interventions, the risk of sensorineural hearing loss and leaving squamous epithelium in the MEC is quite high. In studies, the benet of surgery on hearing level reaches 83.6% [32, 33]. In these studies, it has been reported that in order to obtain good results in the long term, the MEC should continue to be ventilated with the application of a ventilation tube or intervention to the ET.
In patients with AdOM complicated with cholesteatoma, the best surgical option is canal wall-down mastoidectomy without removal of the adhesive tympanic mem­brane. In this option, the aim is to have an epithelial surface that will prevent the accumulation of keratin debris.
420
B. Polat et al.

20.8 Conclusion

The major underlying problem in RP and AdOM is aeration disorder of the MEC.The disease process is long, and serious destructive problems occur in the later periods. The treatment of AdOM is particularly challenging. Therefore, pre­ventive treatment is much more important.

References

1. Cantekin EI, Doyle WJ, Phillips DC, Bluestone CD.Gas absorption in the middle ear. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1980;89(3 Pt 2):71–5.
2. Yamamoto Y.Gas exchange function through the middle ear mucosa in piglets: comparative study of normal and inamed ears. Acta Otolaryngol. 1999;119(1):72–7.
3. Bylander A, Tjernstrom O, Ivarsson A, Andreasson L.Eustachian tube function and its relation to middle ear pressure in children. Auris Nasus Larynx. 1985;12(Suppl 1):S43–5.
4. Sade J, Luntz M.Middle ear gases. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 1992;46(4):355–60.
5. Doyle WJ, Seroky JT, Alper CM.Gas exchange across the middle ear mucosa in monkeys. Estimation of exchange rate. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;121(8):887–92.
6. Hergils L, Magnuson B. Morning pressure in the middle ear. Arch Otolaryngol. 1985;111(2):86–9.
7. Luntz M, Sade J.Daily uctuations of middle ear pressure in atelectatic ears. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1990;99(3 Pt 1):201–4.
8. Aoki K, Mitani Y, Tuji T, Hamada Y, Utahashi H, Moriyama H.Relationship between middle ear pressure, mucosal lesion, and mastoid pneumatization. Laryngoscope. 1998;108(12):1840–5.
9. Avraham S, Luntz M, Sade J.The effect of mastoid surgery on atelectatic ears and retraction pockets. Eur Arch Otorrinolaringol. 1991;248(6):335–6.
10. Marchioni D, Mattioli F, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Presutti L. Prevalence of ventilation blockages in patients affected by attic pathology: a case-control study. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(11):2845–53.
11. Mansour S, Nicolas K, Naim A, Yamine F, Moukarzel N, Nehme A. Inammatory chronic otitis media and the anterior epitympanic recess. J Otolaryngol. 2005;34(3):149–59.
12. Sade J, Avraham S, Brown M. Atelectasis, retraction pockets and cholesteatoma. Acta Otolaryngol. 1981;92(5–6):501–12.
13. Mansour S, Magnan J, Haidar H, Atelectasis NK, Adhesive Otitis Media. Tympanic mem­brane retraction pocket: overview and advances in diagnosis and management. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p.71–82.
14. Marchioni D, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Grammatica A, Mattioli F, Presutti L.Pyramidal eminence and subpyramidal space: an endoscopic anatomical study. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(3):557–64.
15. Zhang Q, Liang J. [Transformation of effusion and formation of granulation tissue in the pathologic process of otitis media with effusion]. Lin chuang er bi yan hou ke za zhi = J Clin Otorhinolaryngol. 1999;13(1):8–11.
16. De Beer BA, Schilder AG, Zielhuis GA, Graamans K.Natural course of tympanic membrane pathology related to otitis media and ventilation tubes between ages 8 and 18 years. Otol Neurotol. 2005;26(5):1016–21.
17. Maw AR, Hall AJ, Pothier DD, Gregory SP, Steer CD.The prevalence of tympanic membrane and related middle ear pathology in children: a large longitudinal cohort study followed from birth to age ten. Otol Neurotol. 2011;32(8):1256–61.
18. Sadé J. Atelectatic tympanic membrane: histologic study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1993;102(9):712–6.
19. Charachon R.Classication des poches de rétraction. Revue de laryngologie, d’otologie et de rhinologie (1919). 1988;109(3):205–7.
20 Retraction Pockets andAdhesive Otitis Media
20. Bours AF, Decat M, Gersdorff M. Our classication of tympanic retraction pockets. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 1998;52(1):25–8.
21. Tos M, Stangerup SE, Larsen P.Dynamics of eardrum changes following secretory otitis. A prospective study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987;113(4):380–5.
22. Dornhoffer JL.Surgical management of the atelectatic ear. Otol Neurotol. 2000;21(3):315–21.
23. Borgstein J, Gerritsma TV, Wieringa MH, Bruce IA. The Erasmus atelectasis classication: proposal of a new classication for atelectasis of the middle ear in children. Laryngoscope. 2007;117(7):1255–9.
24. Tran-Ba-Huy P, Pelisse JM, Sauvage JP, Pialoux P. A proposal of a T.N.M. type of classi­cation of the ear. O.P.A.C. classication of chronic surgical otitis. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac. 1976;93(3):117–28.
25. Bluestone CD.Current concepts in Eustachian tube function as related to otitis media. Auris Nasus Larynx. 1985;12(Suppl 1):S1–4.
26. Daly K. Risk factors for otitis media sequelae and chronicity. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1994;163:39–42.
27. Bremond G, Magnan J, Bonnaud G. L’otite Adhesive Encycl Med Chir. Paris: Elsevier SAS; 1985.
28. Maw AR, Bawden R.Tympanic membrane atrophy, scarring, atelectasis and attic retraction in persistent, untreated otitis media with effusion and following ventilation tube insertion. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1994;30(3):189–204.
29. Zechner G.Adhesive otitis media. J Laryngol Otol Suppl. 1983;8:59–62.
30. Larem A, Haidar H, Alsaadi A, etal. Tympanoplasty in adhesive otitis media: a descriptive study. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(12):2804–10.
31. Magnan JCA, De Gasquet R, Bremond GA. Adhesive otitis: clinical and surgical sides. In: Sadé J, editor. The Eustachian tube, clinical aspects. Amsterdam: Kugler and Ghedini Publications; 1991. p.323–6.
32. Yu LS, Qi ZM. [Operative therapy of the adhesive otitis media]. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2004;39(1):40–43.
33. Shen YM, Sun WQ, Shen H, Li YH. [Tragus cartilage tympanoplasty for treatment of adhesive otitis media]. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2010;30(6):1382–1384.
421
Complications ofOtitis Media
21
SerkanŞerifler, SuelaSallavaci, andMahmutTayyarKalcioglu

21.1 Introduction

The use of antibiotics has led to a general reduction in the incidence of complica­tions associated with otitis media compared with the time before antibiotics were available [1]. However, serious complications can still occur. Some of these can be associated with high mortality rates. Both acute and chronic otitis media can cause intracranial and extracranial complications. Complications of otitis media are a common challenge in developing countries [2]. These complications can be attrib­uted to various factors such as socioeconomic inequalities, limited access to educa­tion, inadequate healthcare facilities, and lack of awareness of otological symptoms. Conversely, in developed countries, the incidence of complications may be inu­enced by factors such as antibiotic resistance, which hinders effective treatment, and the use of antibiotics which can temporarily mask symptoms and lead to delayed diagnosis. In addition, changes in the virulence of the causative microorganisms may also play a role in the complications seen in developed countries [3].
Both acute otitis media (AOM) and chronic otitis media (COM) complications have a similar classication named intracranial and extracranial complications. Intratemporal and extratemporal complications are subdivisions of extracranial [2] (Table 21.1). Among intratemporal complications, acute mastoiditis is the most
S. Şerier (*) A life Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
S. Sallavaci Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Center “Mother Teresa”, Tirana, Albania
M. T. Kalcioglu Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
Goztepe Prof. Dr. Suleyman Yalcin City Hospital, ENT Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024 M. T. Kalcioglu et al. (eds.), Otology Updates, Comprehensive ENT,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76173-7_21
423
424
S. Şerier et al.
Table 21.1 Complications of otitis media
Extracranial Intratemporal:
Acute mastoiditis Facial paralysis Labyrinthitis Labyrinth stula Petrositis Extratemporal: Subperiosteal abscess Bezold abscess Luc abscess
Intracranial Meningitis
Lateral sinus thrombosis Epidural abscess Subdural empyema Otitic hydrocephalus Brain abscess
common. On the other hand, meningitis is recognized as the most common intracra­nial complication, while brain abscess has the highest mortality rate among compli­cations [4]. It is worth noting that two or more complications may coexist.
The development of complications in otitis media depends on ve key elements: the virulence of the infecting organism and its susceptibility to antibiotics, host resistance, the effectiveness of antibiotic treatment, anatomical pathways and barri­ers that facilitate spread, and airspace drainage pathways [5]. In AOM, the primary causative microorganisms are Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus inuenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis, whereas in COM, the pathogens observed include Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus aureus, Proteus, and Bacteroides. For AOM, an appropriate choice of antibiotic is generally sufcient for treatment. However, in COM, medical treatment alone may not be sufcient and surgery may be required to clean the middle ear and mastoid region, remove the infection, and ensure proper ventilation [6, 7]. In both AOM and COM, there are cases where complications make surgery necessary. These situations will be discussed in the fol­lowing sections.
Vigilance for early clinical signs is essential to prevent complications. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment can prevent the onset or progression of many com­plications [8]. While other complications typically manifest in a subacute or chronic manner, meningitis can occur abruptly without early clinical signs. Therefore, com­plications should be suspected if an otological infection persists for more than two weeks [9]. The main clinical signs of complications in AOM are lethargy, altered cognition, irritability (especially in the pediatric population) and fever that does not improve despite antibiotic treatment. These symptoms require immediate attention and further assessment for possible complications. In cases of COM with symptoms such as foul-smelling discharge, pain, and high fever, the possibility of complica­tions should be considered. Specic ndings may be indicative of certain complica­tions. For example, retroorbital pain may suggest petrositis, whereas photophobia
21 Complications ofOtitis Media
425
and altered consciousness may suggest meningitis. Facial asymmetry may suggest facial paralysis. Severe focal neurological signs may suggest a brain abscess, and papilledema may indicate the presence of a brain abscess. Vertigo may be related to labyrinthine problems [10].
The preferred imaging modality is contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) to assess complications. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is particularly useful for intracranial complications [11]. Additional laboratory tests such as a complete blood count, lumbar puncture, tympanocentesis and culture may also be helpful in diagnosing complications. Lumbar puncture can help diagnose intracra­nial spread, but it’s important to rule out increased intracranial pressure and the risk of herniation with imaging before the procedure [12].

21.2 Intratemporal Complications

21.2.1 Acute Mastoiditis
The most common complication of otitis media in the pediatric population is still acute mastoiditis. Acute mastoiditis usually develops after AOM in the pediatric population [13]. Bacteria from the middle ear may migrate into the air cells of the mastoid bone. Less commonly, a cholesteatoma can block ear drainage and lead to mastoiditis. The peak incidence is between 1 and 4years of age. Younger children are susceptible to infection due to immunological deciencies that predispose them to risk factors for otitis media, with an increased risk of progression to acute mas­toiditis (Fig.21.1) [14, 15].
Post-auricular swelling, tenderness, erythema, and auricular protrusion are the most common diagnostic signs. Mucosal inammation, granulation tissue, or cho­lesteatoma may cause occlusion of the aditus and posterior epitympanum, resulting in impaired mastoid drainage and persistent disease in the mastoid. If untreated or inadequately treated, the inammation crosses the mucosa and spreads through the venous channels, causing inammation in the periosteum. As a result of this spread,
Fig. 21.1 Computed tomograhy images of acute mastoiditis
426
S. Şerier et al.
symptoms such as postauricular pain, erythema, and swelling develop. Acute mas­toiditis with acute periostitis usually responds to appropriate antibiotic therapy. Coalescent mastoiditis is characterized by the destruction of bony septa in the mas­toid air cell trabeculae. In acute coalescent mastoiditis, pressurized purulent mate­rial in the mastoid air cells causes necrosis of the bone septa [13].
If the pain persists for up to 2weeks, the purulent discharge does not resolve, or the complaints and ndings worsen, coalescent mastoiditis after AOM is suspected. The most common presenting complaint is postauricular tenderness, which is pres­ent in most patients. If there is a perforation on otoscopy, purulent discharge may be seen in the external ear canal. If there is no perforation, effusion may be seen in the middle ear behind the tympanic membrane. However, the tympanic membrane and middle ear may appear normal in the presence of aditus obstruction. Induration and erythema on the mastoid bone may be a sign of a subperiosteal abscess. If the infec­tion erodes through the lateral cortex of the mastoid medial to the insertion of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, it is known as Bezold’s abscess. Acute mastoiditis is usually caused by S. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes, S. aureus, and H. inuenzae [16]. CT is the main diagnostic tool. Once acute mastoiditis has been diagnosed, aggressive treatment is required. All patients are started on antibiotics on admission. In patients who do not respond, the rst step is to perform a myringotomy, take a culture and, if necessary, insert a ventilation tube. Antibiotics are then given according to the results of the culture. If there is still no response to conservative treatment in a non­coalescing mastoid, cortical mastoidectomy is recommended. Mastoidectomy is performed immediately if there is radiological evidence of coalescing mastoiditis. The aim of mastoidectomy is to debride necrotic tissue, improve ventilation of the mastoid bone and prevent further intracranial complications [17].
21.2.2 Facial Nerve Paralysis
One of the complications of acute or chronic middle ear infection is facial paralysis. Facial palsy following AOM is usually seen in children, is sudden in onset and resolves rapidly with appropriate treatment [18]. In COM, with or without choles­teatoma, paralysis occurs gradually and the prognosis is generally poor. The patho­genesis of paralysis occurs with neuropraxia due to exposure to toxins, compression or edema. The complication usually spreads through dehiscence in the tympanic part of the fallopian canal, where dehiscence is most common. It can develop within 1–2weeks of AOM.The pathogens causing facial paralysis are usually similar to those causing acute otitis media. The virulence of the microorganism and the host’s resistance are critical to the prognosis of the disease, and if the infection has crossed the fallopian canal, the facial nerve may be affected by inammation. With the onset of inammation, edema develops. The edema puts pressure on the facial nerve trapped in the canal and nerve conduction stops, a condition called neuropraxia. On the other hand, the accumulation of purulent material or directly invading bacteria exposes the nerve to extraneural compression and neuritis develops. The arterial
21 Complications ofOtitis Media
427
blood supply to the compressed nerve is impaired and ischemia occurs. This leads to anoxia and degeneration of the nerve [19].
Facial paralysis due to COM can have several causes (e.g., compression due to oedema, direct bacterial inammation, osteitis, bony erosion, neurotoxic substances from cholesteatoma). When facial paralysis develops in a patient with COM, the presence of cholesteatoma is suspected. In subacute and chronic infections, facial paralysis occurs as a result of erosion of the Fallopian canal due to infection or cho­lesteatoma when the nerve meets the infection [20]. Facial paralysis usually devel­ops due to extraneural compression in the tympanic part, particularly in the pyramidal eminence and cochleariform prominence regions. It develops as a result of compression of the nerve between the cholesteatoma and these anatomical structures.
Facial paralysis due to otitis media is diagnosed clinically. Computed tomogra­phy scans can be used to determine the degree of facial canal involvement and the extent of the disease. Electrophysiological tests are helpful in determining the prog­nosis of long-term facial paralysis [21, 22]. The aim of treatment is to remove the infection from the middle ear and mastoid as quickly as possible. Hospitalization, myringotomy, and systemic antibiotic treatment are usually sufcient for facial paralysis due to AOM.The antibiotic regimen may be modied according to the culture obtained at myringotomy, and some authors recommend concomitant corti­costeroid therapy. Mastoidectomy is indicated in patients who do not respond to medical treatment, have subperiosteal abscesses, coalescent mastoiditis, and persis­tent discharge. The purpose of mastoidectomy is to remove infected bone and soft tissue. If the infection has not spread to the tympanic and vertical parts of the facial nerve, it is not necessary to open the nerve sheath (epineurium). However, if the infection has affected the nerve sheath, diseased bone and soft tissue should be removed from the epineurium. Opening the nerve sheath is controversial and there is no evidence that it alters the healing process. If there is pus extending into the Fallopian canal, the sheath can be opened, but this is controversial as it may create a pathway for active infection to reach the nerve. Recovery from complete paralysis may take a long time, but total decompression of the facial nerve is not indicated unless progressive nerve degeneration is demonstrated by electroneuronography. However, in complete paralysis with loss of electrical excitability, the facial nerve should be decompressed from the rst elbow to the stylomastoid foramen [23].
In the treatment of facial paralysis due to COM, in addition to antibiotic therapy, surgical exploration is an absolute emergency. Modied radical mastoidectomy is usually performed to remove the cholesteatoma and explore the facial nerve. Cholesteatoma can affect any part of the facial canal, but the tympanic part and the second elbow are most commonly involved. In cholesteatoma cases, the matrix is removed and the facial nerve is exposed. After the healthy bone proximal and distal to the affected area has been reduced to eggshell thickness with a diamond tourni­quet, it is removed and the epineurium exposed. The disease on the epineurium of the decompressed nerve is removed by blunt dissection. If the cholesteatoma is not invasive, it is not necessary to open the nerve sheath. If there is invasive granulation tissue in the bony canal, the canal should be opened at least to the extent of the
428
S. Şerier et al.
granulation tissue. Care should be taken not to open the nerve sheath unless indi­cated. As the perineurium is a strong barrier, it is very common for the nerve to be exposed to infection if it is opened [20].
21.2.3 Labyrinthitis
There are several ways in which the labyrinth, or inner ear, can be affected by insults. Both Inammation of the meninges or cerebrospinal uid (CSF) can enter the inner ear via the cochlear aqueduct or internal auditory canal (IAC). Bacterial meningitis can cause labyrinthitis and then, signicant hearing loss. Conversely, infection can spread from the labyrinth to the central nervous system. Infection in the middle ear, can also enter the labyrinth through the round or oval window and cause injury. This is thought to be the mechanism behind the cases of labyrinthitis observed in a study. In some rare cases, bacteria from a systemic infection can reach the labyrinth via the bloodstream, following an unusual pattern of hematogenous spread [24].
Labyrinthitis can be classied as either suppurative or serous. Suppurative laby­rinthitis occurs when microorganisms, typically bacteria, invade the labyrinth and cause damage to the cochlea and vestibular system (Fig.21.2). This form of labyrin- thitis often results in permanent severe or profound hearing loss. Serous labyrinthi­tis occurs when the labyrinth is affected by toxic by-products of bacteria or inammatory particles. With serous labyrinthitis, hearing problems are usually milder and temporary. Typically, suppurative labyrinthitis has an initial serous phase that precedes the purulent stage. However, it’s important to note that in meningo­coccal meningitis, labyrinthitis can begin directly with the purulent stage without a preceding serous stage, with one notable exception [25]. Suppurative labyrinthitis can lead to a condition known as “dead ear,” which occurs when bacteria and
Fig. 21.2 Computed tomograhy images of suppurative labyrinthitis
21 Complications ofOtitis Media
429
inammatory cells cause destruction of the basilar membrane. This destructive pro­cess also causes extensive damage to the labyrinth, including the destruction of the organ of Corti and the spiral ganglion. The diagnosis of labyrinthitis is primarily based on a detailed medical history. It is important to remember that dizziness asso­ciated with a known ear condition may be indicative of labyrinthitis. Contrast­enhanced MRI may be used to conrm the diagnosis. This imaging technique provides additional information for the diagnosis of labyrinthitis [26].
Because of the different clinical course of serous and suppurative labyrinthitis, it is important to distinguish between the two conditions. In serous labyrinthitis, symptoms are usually mild and subtle. The patient may experience sensorineural hearing loss, which may go unnoticed and is predominantly high frequency. Vestibular symptoms may also be present. The sense of imbalance may manifest as intermittent positional vertigo or spontaneous episodes of vertigo, suggesting the possibility of endolymphatic hydrops. Diplacusis, a condition in which sounds are perceived differently in each ear, is another cochlear symptom of labyrinthitis. Total hearing loss is not usually seen and there is a potential for hearing recovery. Initially there is an irritative nystagmus with a fast phase towards the affected ear, followed by a (paralytic) nystagmus towards the healthy ear. In suppurative labyrinthitis, the auditory and vestibular symptoms are severe and of rapid onset. There is a complete loss of the cochleovestibular response, resulting in a profound absence of both audi­tory and vestibular function. Vestibular symptoms are particularly severe and may persist for several days. Suppurative labyrinthitis and meningitis should be consid­ered in patients with severe and worsening symptoms. Treatment of labyrinthitis aims to treat the underlying cause. In cases where AOM is the cause, myringotomy and antibacterial therapy are usually sufcient. However, if the cause is perilabyrin­thine osteitis or cholesteatoma, it is necessary to remove the affected tissue by mas­toidectomy after administration of parenteral antibiotics. Some experts recommend delaying surgery until the acute symptoms have resolved to prevent the spread of infection. Once labyrinthitis has been diagnosed, appropriate antibiotic therapy is started and symptom-relieving treatments are given. If symptoms do not improve, the possibility of meningitis should be considered. If there is evidence of meningi­tis, a lumbar puncture should be performed to conrm the diagnosis. It is important to note that suppurative labyrinthitis may resolve if the appropriate treatment for meningitis is given [27].
21.2.4 Labyrinthine Fistula
A labyrinthine stula is observed in approximately 5–10% of cases of COM associ­ated with cholesteatoma. Most commonly, the lateral semicircular canal is affected [28]. In the majority of cases, stula development occurs due to bone erosion caused by the presence of cholesteatoma. Erosion of the otic capsule can occur by two mechanisms: either active mediators or compression by the cholesteatoma lead to osteolysis, or inammatory mediators cause resorption of the otic capsule, as seen in cases of COM without cholesteatoma but with granulation tissue [29].