Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4507_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •1.3.4 The Eustachian Tube
- •1.3.5 Muscles
- •1.3.6 Innervation
- •1.3.7 Vascular Supply
- •1.4 The Inner Ear (Labyrinthine Cavity)
- •1.4.1 The Vestibule
- •1.4.2 Semicircular Canals
- •1.4.4 The Cochlea
- •1.4.5 Innervation
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 The External Ear
- •1.2.1 The Auricle
- •1.2.3 The Eternal Auditory Canal/External Acoustic Meatus
- •1.3 The Middle Ear (Tympanic Cavity)
- •1.3.1 The Tympanic Membrane
- •1.3.3 Ossicles
- •1.4.6 Cochlea Nerve Anatomy
- •1.4.7 Vestibular Nerves
- •1.4.8 The Vestibulocochlear Nerve
- •1.5 The Central Hearing System
- •1.5.3 Auditory Input
- •1.5.4 The Auditory Nerve’s Descending Routes
- •References
- •2: Outer–Middle–Inner Ear Embryology
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Embryology
- •2.3.1 First Week
- •2.3.3 Third Week
- •2.3.4 Fourth Week
- •2.3.5 Sixth Week
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.3 The Outer Ear
- •3.3.1 Anatomy
- •3.3.3 Localization
- •3.4 The Middle Ear
- •3.4.3 Middle Ear Muscles
- •3.4.4 The Eustachian Tube
- •3.4.5 Impedance Matching
- •3.5 The Inner Ear
- •3.5.1.1 Lateral Wall
- •3.5.1.2 Reissner’s Membrane
- •3.5.1.3 The Basilar Membrane
- •3.5.2.1 Hair Cells
- •Inner Hair Cells
- •Outer Hair Cells
- •3.5.3 The Tectorial Membrane
- •3.5.4 The Osseous Spiral Lamina
- •3.5.5 Cochlear Mechanics
- •3.5.5.1 Passive Mechanics
- •3.5.5.2 Active Mechanics
- •3.6.1 Auditory Nerve Fibers
- •3.6.2 The Subcortical Auditory Nuclei
- •3.6.2.1 The Cochlear Nucleus
- •3.6.2.2 The Superior Olivary Complex
- •3.6.2.3 The Lateral Lemniscus
- •3.6.2.4 Inferior Colliculus
- •3.6.2.5 The Medial Geniculate Body
- •3.6.3 The Auditory Cortex
- •3.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Eustachian Tube Anatomy
- •4.4 Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
- •References
- •5: Temporal Bone Radiology
- •5.1.1 Introduction
- •5.1.2 Computed Tomography (CT)
- •5.1.3 Temporal Bone CT Angiography
- •5.1.4 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
- •5.1.5 Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI)
- •5.1.6 Conclusion
- •5.2.1 Introduction
- •5.2.2.1 The External Auditory Canal (EAC)
- •5.2.3 Temporal Bone Fractures
- •5.2.4 Conclusion
- •5.3.1 Introduction
- •5.3.2 Necrotizing Otitis Externa
- •5.3.3 Middle Ear
- •5.3.3.2 Chronic Otitis Media
- •5.3.3.3 Cholesteatomas
- •5.3.3.4 Cholesterol Granulomas
- •5.3.4 Inner Ear
- •5.3.4.1 Labyrinthitis
- •5.3.4.2 Petrous Apicitis
- •5.3.5 Conclusion
- •5.4.1 Introduction
- •5.4.2.1 Cerebellopontine Angle Tumors
- •Vestibular Schwannomas
- •Arachnoid Cysts
- •Meningiomas
- •5.5.2 External Auditory Canal Aplasia
- •5.5.4 Inner Ear Malformations
- •5.5.4.1 Complete Labyrinthine Aplasia/Michel Anomaly
- •5.5.4.2 Rudimentary Otocysts
- •5.5.4.3 Common Cavity Malformation
- •5.5.4.4 Incomplete Partition (IP) Type I
- •5.5.4.5 Incomplete Partition Type II/Mondini Malformation
- •5.5.4.6 Incomplete Partition Type III
- •5.5.4.7 Cochlear Anomalies
- •5.5.4.8 Semicircular Canal Anomalies
- •5.5.6 Conclusion
- •5.6.1 Introduction
- •5.6.2 Otospongiosis/Otosclerosis
- •Epidermoids
- •5.4.2.2 The Middle Ear
- •5.4.2.4 Petrous Bone
- •5.4.2.5 Metastatic Tumors
- •5.4.3 Conclusion
- •5.5.1 Introduction
- •5.6.3 Third Window Lesions
- •5.6.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.3.1 What Is Sound?
- •6.3.2 Sound Intensity
- •6.4 Psychoacoustics
- •6.4.1 Signal Detection Theory
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.1.1 What Is Sound?
- •7.2 Fundamental Acoustic Concepts
- •7.2.3 Period
- •7.2.4 Frequency
- •7.2.5 Wavelength
- •7.3 Psychoacoustics
- •7.3.1 Loudness
- •7.3.2 Auditory Masking
- •7.3.2.1 Simultaneous Masking
- •7.3.2.2 Temporal Masking
- •7.4.2 Spatial Hearing
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Case History
- •8.3 The Audiology Test Room
- •8.4.1 Pure-Tone Audiometry
- •8.4.1.1 Masking
- •8.4.2 Speech Audiometry
- •8.4.3 Pediatric Assessment
- •8.5.1 Acoustic Immittance Audiometry
- •8.5.1.1 Tympanometry
- •Tympanogram Interpretation
- •8.5.1.2 Multifrequency Tympanometry
- •8.5.1.3 Wideband Tympanometry
- •8.5.1.4 Acoustic Reflex Test
- •8.5.1.5 The Reflex Decay Test
- •8.5.1.6 Eustachian Tube Evaluation
- •8.5.2 Otoacoustic Emissions
- •8.5.2.2 Performing Otoacoustic Emission Tests
- •8.5.3 Auditory Evoked Potentials
- •8.5.3.2 Auditory Evoked Brainstem Response
- •Stimulus Types
- •Stimulus Polarity
- •Stimulus Presentation Rate
- •Stimulus Intensity
- •Analysis Time (Recording Epoch)
- •Filters
- •Artifact Rejection Level
- •Electrodes
- •8.5.3.3 Auditory Steady-State Responses
- •8.5.3.4 Electrocochleography
- •Electrocochleography Analysis
- •8.5.3.5 Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials
- •8.5.3.6 Event-Related Auditory Potentials
- •P300
- •Mismatch Negativity
- •Acoustic Change Complex
- •8.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2.3 Conductive Hearing Loss
- •9.2.4 Sensorineural Hearing Loss
- •9.2.4.1 Internal Acoustic Canal Tumors
- •9.2.4.2 Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder
- •9.2.4.3 Third Window Syndrome
- •9.2.4.4 Dead Region
- •9.2.5 Mixed Hearing Loss
- •9.3 Hearing Loss Configuration
- •9.3.3 Unilateral or Bilateral Hearing Loss
- •9.3.4 Symmetric or Asymmetric Hearing Loss
- •9.3.5 Fluctuating or Stable Hearing Loss
- •9.4 Diagnostic Tests
- •9.4.1 Pure Tone Threshold Testing
- •9.4.2 Speech Recognition Tests
- •9.4.3 Tympanometric Tests
- •9.4.4 Stapedial Reflex
- •9.4.5 Otoacoustic Emission Test
- •9.4.6 Auditory Brainstem Responses
- •9.6 Reporting Audiological Findings
- •9.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2.1 Anamnesis
- •10.2.2 Hearing Loss
- •10.2.3 Ear Pain (Otalgia)
- •10.2.4 Ear Discharge (Otorrhea)
- •10.2.5 Itchy Ear
- •10.2.8 Physical Examination
- •10.2.8.1 Inspection
- •10.2.8.2 Palpation
- •10.2.8.3 Otoscopy
- •10.2.12 Hearing Examination
- •10.2.13 Hearing Assessment
- •10.2.13.1 Whisper Test
- •10.2.13.2 Tuning Fork Tests
- •Rinne Test
- •Weber Test
- •Schwabach Test
- •Gelle Test
- •10.3 Conclusion
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2.1 Microphone
- •11.2.2 Amplifier
- •11.2.3 Receiver
- •11.2.4 Batteries
- •11.2.5 Earmolds/Domes
- •11.4 Hearing Aid Types
- •11.5.1 Directional Microphone Technologies
- •11.5.2 Digital Noise Reduction
- •11.5.3 Frequency Lowering
- •11.5.4 Feedback Canceller
- •11.5.5 Bluetooth
- •11.6 Other Hearing Aid Technologies
- •11.7 Pediatric Hearing Aid Application
- •11.7.3.7 Hearing Aid Fitting
- •Prescription Formula Preference
- •Objective Verification Tools
- •Subjective Verification Tools
- •Fine-Tuning
- •11.8 Adult Hearing Aid Application
- •11.8.1.1 Medical Evaluation
- •11.8.1.2 Audiological Evaluation
- •11.8.1.3 Physical Evaluation
- •11.8.1.4 Psychological Evaluation
- •11.8.2 Hearing Aid Application Process
- •11.8.2.1 Anamnesis
- •11.8.2.6 Hearing Aid Fitting
- •Fine-Tuning
- •11.9 Conclusion
- •11.10 Case Studies
- •11.10.1 Case 1
- •11.10.2 Case 2
- •11.10.3 Case 3
- •11.10.4 Case 4
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.3.1 Pathophysiology
- •12.3.2 Management
- •12.3.3 Etiology
- •12.3.4 Epidemiology
- •12.3.5 Assessing
- •12.3.6 Treatment
- •References
- •13: Otoplasty
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 General Information
- •13.2.1 Auricular Anthropometry
- •13.3 History
- •13.8.1 Conservative Treatment
- •13.8.2 Surgical Treatment
- •13.11 Patient Follow-Up
- •13.12 Case Examples
- •13.13 Complications
- •13.13.1 Early Complications
- •13.13.2 Late Complications
- •13.13.3.1 Telephone Ear Deformity
- •13.13.3.2 Reverse Telephone Ear Deformity
- •13.13.3.5 Antihelical Malposition
- •13.13.3.6 Tragal Prominence
- •13.13.3.7 Auricular Lines
- •13.14 Revision Otoplasty
- •References
- •14: External Ear Tract Diseases
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2.1 Atopic Dermatitis
- •14.2.2 Allergic Contact Dermatitis
- •14.2.3 Photoallergic Dermatitis
- •14.2.4 Psoriasis
- •14.2.5 Relapsing Polychondritis
- •14.2.6 Gout
- •14.3 Traumatic Disorders
- •14.3.1 Irritant Contact Dermatitis
- •14.3.2 Phototoxic Dermatitis
- •14.3.3 Phototrauma
- •14.4 Infectious Diseases
- •14.4.1 Otitis Externa
- •14.4.1.1 Background
- •14.4.1.2 Anatomy
- •14.4.1.3 Classification
- •14.4.1.5 Diagnosis
- •14.4.1.6 Management
- •References
- •15: Auricula Tumors
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.2 Benign Tumors
- •15.2.1 Chondrodermatitis Nodularis Chronica Helicis
- •15.2.2 Cystic Chondromalacia
- •15.2.3 Ceruminous Gland Adenoma
- •15.3 Malign Tumors
- •15.3.1 Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC)
- •15.3.2 Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- •15.3.3 Ceruminous Gland Adenocarcinoma
- •15.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •16: Acute Suppurative Otitis Media
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Pathophysiology
- •16.3 Etiology
- •16.3.1 Host Factors
- •16.3.1.1 Immune System
- •16.3.1.2 Hereditary Susceptibility
- •16.3.1.3 Mucins
- •16.3.1.4 Anatomic Abnormalities
- •16.3.1.5 Physiologic Dysfunction
- •16.3.2 Infectious Factors
- •16.3.2.1 Bacterial Pathogens
- •16.3.2.2 Viral Pathogens
- •16.3.3 Environmental Factors
- •16.3.3.1 Infant Feeding Methods
- •16.4 Classification
- •16.6 Diagnosis
- •16.7 Treatment
- •16.7.1 Antibiotic Therapy Versus Observation
- •16.7.2 Initial Antibiotic Therapy
- •16.7.3 Supplemental Programs
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 Definition
- •17.4 Pathophysiology
- •17.5 Diagnosis
- •17.5.1 Clinical Evaluation
- •17.6 Treatment
- •17.6.1 Medical Treatment
- •17.6.2 Surgical Treatment
- •17.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •18: Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media
- •18.1 Introduction
- •18.2 Epidemiology
- •18.3 Pathophysiology
- •18.4 Microbiology
- •18.5 Histopathology
- •18.6 Clinical Manifestations
- •18.6.1 Tubotympanic Type
- •18.6.2 Atticoantral Type
- •18.7 Diagnosis
- •18.7.1 Anamnesis
- •18.7.2 Otoscopic Examination
- •18.7.3 Audiological Evaluation
- •18.7.4 Imaging
- •18.8 Treatment
- •18.8.1 Medical Treatment
- •18.8.2 Surgical Treatment
- •18.9 Complications
- •18.10 Future Directions
- •18.11 Conclusion
- •References
- •19: Cholesteatoma
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.2 Definition
- •19.3 Epidemiology
- •19.4 Histopathology
- •19.7 Cholesteatoma Types
- •19.7.1 Congenital Cholesteatoma
- •19.7.2 Acquired Cholesteatoma
- •19.7.2.2 Epithelial Migration Theory
- •19.7.2.3 Basal Cell Hyperplasia Theory
- •Tos Staging
- •Sade Staging
- •19.7.3 Unclassified Cholesteatomas
- •19.7.4 Petrous Bone Cholesteatomas
- •19.8 Practical Classification
- •19.8.1 Attic Cholesteatomas
- •19.8.2 Sinus Cholesteatomas
- •19.8.3 Pars Tensa Cholesteatomas
- •19.9 Clinical Presentations
- •19.9.1 Cholesteatoma Microbiology
- •19.10 Diagnosis
- •19.10.2 Computed Tomography
- •19.10.3 Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •19.10.4 Audiometric Evaluation
- •19.11.1 Closed Techniques
- •19.11.2 Open Techniques
- •19.12 Conclusion
- •References
- •20.1 Introduction
- •20.2 Physiology
- •20.2.4 Tympanic Isthmus
- •20.4 Pathophysiology
- •20.5 Clinical Picture
- •20.6 Management
- •20.6.1 Surgical Management
- •20.6.1.2 Tympanoplasty
- •20.6.1.3 Mastoid Surgery
- •20.7 Adhesive Otitis Media
- •20.7.1 Pathogenesis
- •20.7.2 Clinical Findings
- •20.7.3 Imaging
- •20.7.4 Treatment
- •20.8 Conclusion
- •References
- •21.1 Introduction
- •21.2 Intratemporal Complications
- •21.2.1 Acute Mastoiditis
- •21.2.2 Facial Nerve Paralysis
- •21.2.3 Labyrinthitis
- •21.2.4 Labyrinthine Fistula
- •21.2.5 Petrositis
- •21.3 Intracranial Complications
- •21.3.1 Meningitis
- •21.3.2 Lateral Sinus Thrombosis
- •21.3.3 Brain Abscess
- •21.3.4 Otitic Hydrocephalus
- •21.3.5 Epidural Abscess
- •21.3.6 Subdural Empyema
- •21.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •22: Basic Otological Surgical Techniques
- •22.1 Introduction
- •22.3 Atticotomy
- •22.4 Mastoidectomy
- •22.4.1 Simple (Cortical) Mastoidectomy
- •22.4.2 Canal Wall-Up Mastoidectomy
- •22.4.3 Canal Wall-Down Mastoidectomy
- •22.4.4 Retrograde Mastoidectomy
- •22.4.5 Modified Radical Mastoidectomy
- •22.4.6 Radical Mastoidectomy
- •22.4.7 Mastoid Obliteration
- •22.5 Petrosectomy
- •22.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •23: Tympanoplasty
- •23.1 Introduction
- •23.2.1 Chronic Otitis Media
- •23.2.2 Traumatic Perforations
- •23.5 Tympanoplasty Types
- •23.7 Graft Materials
- •23.8 Graft Techniques
- •23.8.1 The Perichondrium/Cartilage Island Graft
- •23.8.2 The Palisade Graft
- •23.8.3 The Temporalis Fascia Graft
- •23.9 Surgical Approaches
- •23.9.1 Microscopic Approach
- •23.9.2 Endoscopic Approach
- •23.10.1 Transmeatal Incisions
- •23.10.1.1 The Rosen Incision
- •23.10.1.3 Anterior Tympanomeatal Flap
- •23.10.2 Endaural Incision
- •23.10.3 Postauricular Incision
- •23.11 Pediatric Tympanoplasty
- •23.12 Prognostic Factors
- •23.14 Conclusion
- •References
- •24: Ossiculoplasty
- •24.1 Introduction
- •24.4 Indications/Contraindications
- •24.5 Reconstruction Materials
- •24.7 Surgical Preparation
- •24.8 Surgical Technique
- •24.9 Ossiculoplasty Results
- •24.10 Complications
- •24.11 Postoperative Care
- •24.12 Follow-Up
- •24.13 Conclusion
- •References
- •25: Tympanomastoidectomy
- •25.1 Introduction
- •25.2 Surgical Anatomy
- •25.4 Indications
- •25.5 Technique
- •25.5.1 Patient’s Preparation
- •25.5.3 Simple Mastoidectomy
- •25.5.4 Posterior Tympanostomy or Facial Recess Approach
- •25.5.5 Epitympanectomy
- •25.5.6 Endolymphatic Sac Procedures
- •25.5.8 Atticotomy-Atticoantrotomy

324
dangerous, surgery should be considered as a last resort. On the other hand, reconstructive and oncologic procedures are complicated by the anatomy and structure
of the auricle [1].
M. Altıntaş et al.
15.2 Benign Tumors
15.2.1 Chondrodermatitis Nodularis Chronica Helicis
“Chondrodermatitis nodularis chronica helicis,” formerly known as “Winkler’s
disease,” is a painful benign condition of the auricle. Macroscopically, a tiny,
sometimes ulcerated nodule appears on the pinna, most commonly on the upper
part of the helix. This benign ulcerated nodule can be confused with malignancy
as it may clinically and histologically resemble squamous cell carcinoma.
Although the disease more commonly occurs in middle-aged and elderly men,
it can also affect younger adults and women. Although the exact cause of the
lesions is unknown, cartilage ischemia is likely a contributing factor. Acute
inammation, followed by cartilage necrosis and epidermal ulceration likely
results from occlusion of the small arteries of the perichondrium, as the helix
being one of the farthest points from the source of arterial blood supply to the
auricle. An association between systemic sclerosis and helical chondrodermatitis has been documented. Small artery obstructive changes are common in this
disease [11].
Sleeping over the affected side and, more recently, the use of restrictive
headgear, headphones, and Bluetooth earpieces have been associated with the
development of lesions. It may occur after minor trauma or exposure to
cold [12].
Anatomic analysis of representative biopsies reveals ulceration of the auricular
skin and total necrosis of the underlying elastic cartilage tip, as seen in the highly
represented elastic cartilage beneath the auricular skin. A fragment of necrotic cartilage is seen extruded at the base of the ulcer. Obstructive thickening of small arteries is seen in the perichondrium of the elastic cartilage in the ulcer region. The
important differential diagnosis is SCC.However, atypia and pseudo- epitheliomatous
hyperplasia may be seen in the epithelium adjacent to the ulcer. Cosmetic considerations are important and treatment is surgical [11].
15.2.2 Cystic Chondromalacia
Potentially confused with chondrodermatitis nodularis chronica helicis and SCC,
this auricular benign cystic degenerative inammatory disease is best left untreated.
In most cases, the lesions do not involve both simultaneously and can be quite large
(up to 4cm) and recurrent. A representative sample of auricular cartilage is required
for diagnosis. Chondrodermatitis nodularis chronica helicis is the primary differential diagnosis [11].

15 Auricula Tumors
325
15.2.3 Ceruminous Gland Adenoma
Adenoma NOS (ceruminous adenoma), pleomorphic adenoma, and syringocystoma
papilliferum are the fth edition histologic categories for benign tumors of the ceruminous glands. These tumors share some histologic features with the tumor in question. However, they also show signs of ceruminous differentiation, such as decapitation
secretion and yellow ceroid pigment, which are absent in the described tumor. Most
of the tumors are glandular in shape and may occasionally develop cysts. As a result
of interglandular brosis, lesional cells invade the surrounding stroma. The architecture may be solid with features such as papillary or back-to-back glands.
Immunostaining, hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections, and luminal epithelial cells
are occasionally seen along with outer basal and myoepithelial cells [13]. Tumors
have mild nuclear pleomorphism and low-to-moderate cellularity. With small nucleoli
and ne granular chromatin, nuclei may be either round or oval. Columnar to cuboidal
luminal cells typically have apical caps and decapitate secretions, rich eosinophilic
cytoplasm, and well-dened cell borders. Cytoplasmic granules of ceroid pigment, a
golden yellow or brownish color, are seen in most tumor cells [11].
15.3 Malign Tumors
15.3.1 Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC)
A common form of skin cancer, basal cell carcinoma (BCC), develops in the basal
layer of the epidermis and its extensions (Fig.15.1). Because BCC is aggressive,
destructive, and locally invasive, this tumor requires treatment. Radiation therapy,
cryotherapy, topical medications, photodynamic therapy (PDT), curettage and electrodesiccation (C&E), surgical excision, and Mohs micrographic surgery are some
of the treatment options for BCC.The choice of treatment is inuenced by tumor
characteristics such as location, size, pathology, treatment tolerance, cost, and also
patient preference [14].
Characteristics Associated with Minimal Likelihood of Recurrence
According to the “2021 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)” clinical practice guidelines for cutaneous BCC, the following factors can be used to
identify BCCs that are less likely to recur after treatment [15]:
• Location and size
– Trunk and extremity lesions (excluding genitalia, pretibial area, hands, and
feet) having a diameter of <20mm.
• Pathology
– Supercial or nodular “histopathologic growth pattern,” other less common
“nonaggressive growth patterns” (“cystic infundibula, broepithelioma of
pinkus”)
– Absence of “perineural invasion”

326
Fig. 15.1 Ulcerative and
inltrative basal cell
carcinoma of skin and
brous and chondroid
tissue
M. Altıntaş et al.
• Other
– “Primary lesion” (nonrecurrent)
– Clinically “well-dened” margins
– No history of radiotherapy at the site
– Immunocompromised patient
Pretreatment Evaluation
The rst and foremost consideration when deciding on a course of treatment for
BCC should be the likelihood of lesion recurrence. This includes taking a thorough
history (including any previous lesions, immunosuppressive drug use, and comorbidities), performing an elaborate physical examination, and nally performing a
biopsy of the suspicious lesion [14].
Risk assessment and lesion biopsies; A skin biopsy is necessary to confirm
the diagnosis of BCC and to provide additional information about the risk of
tumor recurrence after therapy. However, an experienced clinician can usually
make a diagnosis based on clinical and dermoscopic examination alone. Prior
to destructive or nonsurgical treatment, a diagnostic confirmatory biopsy of
the lesion is critical, especially in patients who are not candidates for surgery [14].

15 Auricula Tumors
327
The Choice of Treatment
A variety of surgical and non-surgical therapies can be used to treat BCC [16]. The
following factors [14] inuence strategy for treating BCC patients with a low likelihood of recurrence:
Aggressive treatment of BCC with a low recurrence risk may result in unnecessary suffering, treatment and travel expenses, and disruption of the patient’s family
and occupational life. On the contrary, inadequate treatment of aggressive lesions
can result in recurrence, which can be devastating.
Surgical excision is usually recommended as rst-line treatment for BCC with a
low recurrence risk [17]. Taking into account the following [14] may indicate that
other methods are more appropriate for some patients:
• The patient’s age, immunosuppression, and comorbidities
• The location of the tumor
• Factors related to the tumor (such as whether it is supercial or nodular, or
whether there are one or many lesions)
• How things seem and work
• Whether certain methods or experts are readily available
• The relative effectiveness and cost of different treatments
When choosing a treatment, it is important to consider patient-specic considerations. Patients’ ability to tolerate surgical intervention, manage wounds, apply
topical therapies, and comply with follow-up visits are all affected by their physical
or functional limitations and inuence their therapeutic choices.
It is important to consider the different treatment options. Alternative therapies
may be more appropriate for patients who prefer not to undergo curettage and electrodesiccation (C&E) because of the risk of pigmentary changes and scarring [14].
The Standard Surgical Excision
The recommended initial treatment for primary, nodular, or supercial BCC less
than a diameter of 20mm found over the trunk and extremities (with the exception
of the genitals, pretibial area, hands, or feet) is conventional surgical excision followed by evaluation of the surgical margin. Margins between 4 and 5mm are generally considered adequate [14].
Other treatments are equally effective but less time consuming and expensive.
For example, Mohs surgery is not necessary for primary BCC over the trunk or
extremities that don’t have aggressive histopathologic or clinical features [14].
The usual method of healing is immediate closure of the surgical incision or
transplantation of nearby tissue or skin. As a result, wounds can heal in as little as
one to two weeks. The availability and elasticity of adjacent tissues, the size, location, and depth of the defect, and clinician and patient preference are among the
variables that determine the type of closure [14].
In 2010, a meta-analysis evaluated 37 studies that were mostly observational and
found 4–5mm margins to be appropriate [18]. The mean recurrence rates were 0.4,
1.6, 2.6, and 4% for BCCs excised with a surgical margin of 5, 4, 3, and 2mm,

328
M. Altıntaş et al.
respectively, according to the analysis of pooled data obtained from 10,261 individuals having 16,066 nodular BCCs of low-risk treated with surgical excision [18].
Surgical margins of 3–5mm resulted in similarly high rates of pathologically veried complete excisions [14].
15.3.2 Squamous Cell Carcinoma
According to research by Clayman etal., SCC accounts for 87% of all cases, with
18% of these cases involving the auricle. The most extensive carcinoma was
17.0cm [19], while the average size was 2.0cm at diagnosis. Another study of
patients diagnosed with SCC of the external ear canal and middle ear revealed that
87% of the patients had bone erosion, and 1% of patients had metastases [20, 21]
(Fig.15.2).
The histologic appearance of external and middle ear SCC is identical to that
of any other specied site of the body. Lesions on the skin of the auricle are
immediately visible whereas the skin of the external auditory canal (EAC) is out
of sight and difcult to examine or biopsy. The goal of auricular surgery is to
achieve the best result cosmetically while preserving organs: inadequate biopsy
specimens and lack of expertise in their interpretation cause problems in the
diagnosis of EAC lesions. Due to the late presentation of the lesions and the
potential need for major surgery, surgical procedures represent the majority of
treatment. Surgical pathologists have difculty interpreting tumor size for staging and margin assessment based on histologic evaluation of resected specimens.
With its complicated anatomy and method of macroscopic inspection, SCC of
the ear and temporal bone has recently been the subject of an update on examination and staging [21]. Tumors requiring surgical intervention at this site other
than SCC may also benet from the approach and procedures [11].
Fig. 15.2 Inltrative
squamous cell carcinoma
of the auricle

15 Auricula Tumors
329
15.3.3 Ceruminous Gland Adenocarcinoma
This group includes cancers that develop in the ceruminous glands of the external
ear. Adenocarcinoma NOS (“ceruminous adenocarcinoma”), “ceruminous adenoid
cystic carcinoma”, and “ceruminous mucoepidermoid carcinoma” are the three
separate histologic forms included. The histology of “adenoid cystic carcinoma and
mucoepidermoid carcinoma” is identical to that of salivary gland carcinoma [11].
The middle ear and mastoid cavity are the only sites where adenoid cystic carcinoma has been reported [22]. A preponderance of tubular and cribriform morphology characterizes low-grade tumors. In contrast, high-grade tumors are dened
as those with solid morphology in at least 30% of the tumor area. In addition to
morphology, other factors inuence prognosis. Surgery may not be able to cure
low-grade tumors that have spread to inaccessible areas, such as the temporal bone.
Adenoid cystic carcinoma is associated with fusions between the “MYB, MYBL1,
and NF1B genes,” which are also present in metastases [23]. “MYB-NF1B gene
fusion,” which upregulates MYB, is found to be specic to adenoid cystic carcinoma only. Immunohistochemistry has shown cases of MYB overexpression, but
the specicity of these cases has been inconsistent [24]. In addition to HPVassociated sinonasal carcinoma [25], other tumor types have been found to express
MYB by immunohistochemistry, including “basaloid squamous cell carcinoma,
basal cell adenocarcinoma, and myoepithelial epithelial carcinoma” [26].
According to a recent study, a negative immunostaining result for MYB could
indicate that the tumor would have a poorer prognosis. According to the same
study, cytoplasmic beta-catenin positivity may increase tumor-associated mortality
risk [27].
15.4 Conclusion
Benign and malignant tumors of the tissues in this region can be encountered in the
auricula as in our entire body. The most common ones are skin and cartilage tumors.
The advantage of this area is that, due to its visually observable location, the tumor
can be noticed even when it is very small, and early application to the physician can
be made. Another advantage is that total excision is possible. Since it is located in
the end organ location, distant metastasis is not common.
References
1. Özgür E, Kamiloğlu U, Temiz P, Eskiizmir G.Skin cancers of the auricle: a retrospective
analysis of 41 patients. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Sep;58(3):169–73.
2. Eisemann N, Waldmann A, Geller AC, et al. Non-melanoma skin cancer incidence and
impact of skin cancer screening on incidence. J Invest Dermatol. 2014;134:43–50. https://doi.
org/10.1038/jid.2013.304.
3. Arons MS, Savin RC.Auricular cancer. Some surgical and pathologic considerations. Am J
Surg. 1971;122:770–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002- 9610(71)90445- 4.

330
4. Apalla Z, Lallas A, Sotiriou E, Lazaridou E, Ioannides D.Epidemiological trends in skin cancer. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2017;7:1–6. https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.0702a01.
5. Brantsch KD, Meisner C, Schonsch B, etal. Analysis of risk factors determining prognosis
of cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma: a prospective study. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:713–20.
6. Gallagher RP, Hill GB, Bajdik CD, et al. Sunlight exposure, pigmentary factors, and risk
ofnonmelanocytic skin cancer. I Basal cell carcinoma Arch Dermatol. 1995;131:157–63.
https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1995.01690140041006.
7. Madan V, Lear JT, Szeimies RM.Non-melanoma skin cancer. Lancet. 2010;375:673–85.
8. Fattahi TT. An overview of facial aesthetic units. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003
Oct;61(10):1207–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278- 2391(03)00684- 0.
9. Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day CL Jr. Prognostic factors for local recurrence, metastasis, and
survival rates in squamous cell carcinomaof the skin, ear, and lip. Implications for treatment
modality selection. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;26:976–90.
10. Veness MJ.Dening patients with high-risk cutaneous squamouscell carcinoma. Australas J
Dermatol. 2006;47:28–33.
11. Sandison A.Update from the 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classication of
Head and Neck Tumours: Tumours of the ear. Head Neck Pathol. 2022 Mar;16(1):76–86.
12. Salah H, Urso B, Khachemoune A.Review of the etiopathogenesis and management options
of chondrodermatitis nodularis chronica helicis. Cureus. 2018;10(3):e2367.
13. Oga Ogawa K, Nakamura K, Hatano K, etal. Treatment and prognosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the external auditory canal and middle ear: a multi-institutional retrospective review
of 87 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68(5):1326–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
ijrobp.2007.01.052.
14. Aasi SZ. Treatment and prognosis of basal cell carcinoma at low risk of recurrence. In:
Stern RS, Robinson JK, Corona R (Eds). UpToDate. Last updated: Oct 11, 2024. https://
e1c9b1a9cc9b2679354d789c7627a4c889c411cc.vetisonline.com/contents/treatmentand-prognosis-of-basal-cell-carcinoma-at-low-risk-of-recurrence?search=Treatment%20
and%20prognosis%20of%20basal%20cell%20carcinoma%20at%20low%20risk%20of%20
recurrence&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1%7E150&usage_type=default&display_
(Accessed online at January 7th, 2025).
15. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology:
Basal cell skin cancer. Version 2.2021. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/
nmsc.pdf. Accessed on 13 Aug 2021.
16. Cameron MC, Lee E, Hibler BP, et al. Basal cell carcinoma: Contemporary approaches to
diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80:321.
17. Peris K, Fargnoli MC, Garbe C, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of basal cell carcinoma:
European consensus-based interdisciplinary guidelines. Eur J Cancer. 2019;118:10.
18. Gulleth Y, Goldberg N, Silverman RP, Gastman BR.What is the best surgical margin for a
basal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1222.
19. Clayman GL, Lee JJ, Holsinger FC, etal. Mortality risk from squamous cell skin cancer. J Clin
Oncol. 2005 Feb;23(4):759–65. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.02.155.
20. Kloss B, Lapoint J, Dougher K.Auricular squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Emerg Med. 2011
Aug;8(4):50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1865- 1380- 4- 50.
21. Allanson BM, Low TH, Clark JR, Gupta R.Squamous cell carcinoma of the external Auditory
Canal and temporal bone: an update. Head Neck Pathol. 2018;12(3):407–18. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s12105- 018- 0908- 4.
22. Zhang J, Tingting H, Jin Y, Xianmin W, Li H, Xiaoyun C.A rare case of adenoid cystic carcinoma isolated in the mastoid. J Int Adv Otol. 2019 Apr;15(1):177–80. https://doi.org/10.5152/
iao.2019.6036.
23. Andreasen S, Agander TK, Bjørndal K, etal. Genetic rearrangements, hotspot mutations, and
microRNA expression in the progression of metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary gland. Oncotarget. 2018;9(28):19675–87. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24800.
M. Altıntaş et al.

15 Auricula Tumors
24. West RB, Kong C, Clarke N, etal. MYB expression and translocation in adenoid cystic carcinomas and other salivary gland tumors with clinicopathologic correlation. Am J Surg Pathol.
2011;35(1):92–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182002777.
25. Shah AA, Oliai BR, Bishop JA.Consistent LEF-1 and MYB immunohistochemical expression
in human papillomavirus-related multiphenotypic sinonasal carcinoma: a potential diagnostic
pitfall. Head Neck Pathol. 2019;13(2):220–4.
26. Brill LB 2nd, Kanner WA, Fehr A, et al. Analysis of MYB expression and MYB-NFIB
gene fusions in adenoid cystic carcinoma and other salivary neoplasms. Mod Pathol.
2011;24(9):1169–76. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2011.86.
27. Park S, Vora M, van Zante A, etal. Clinicopathologic implications of Myb and Beta-catenin
expression in adenoid cystic carcinoma. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;49(1):48. https://
doi.org/10.1186/s40463- 020- 00446- 1.
331

Part IV
Middle Ear Pathologies and Management

Acute Suppurative Otitis Media
16
AliBudak, CemalCingi, andKevinA.Peng
16.1 Introduction
In childhood infections, otitis media (OM) ranks second only to upper respiratory
infections (URIs) in frequency. Additionally, OM is the most common reason for
pediatric visits to the doctor. Not including trips to the emergency room, an estimated 16 million ofce visits per year are linked to OM [1].
Any middle ear inammation, regardless of its cause or origin, is termed
OM.Each subtype has a unique history, course, symptoms, and physical manifestations [1]. In this chapter, we discuss the spectrum of OM, with a focus on acute
suppurative otitis media, sometimes more simply termed acute otitis media (AOM).
16.2 Pathophysiology
Because the mucociliary system of the middle ear includes the mucosa at the pharyngeal end of the Eustachian tube (ET), malfunction of the ET is the most critical
factor causing middle ear disease. When edema, tumors, or negative intratympanic
pressure interfere with this mucosa, infectious processes can directly extend from
the nasopharynx to the middle ear, resulting in OM.Direct mechanical disruption of
A. Budak
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
C. Cingi (*)
Faculty of Medical, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Eskisehir Osmangazi University,
Eskisehir, Türkiye
K. A. Peng
House Clinic and House Institute Foundation, Los Angeles, CA, USA
e-mail: kpeng@houseclinic.com
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
Switzerland AG 2024
M. T. Kalcioglu et al. (eds.), Otology Updates, Comprehensive ENT,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76173-7_16
335
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
