Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4507_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
34 Мб
Скачать
324
dangerous, surgery should be considered as a last resort. On the other hand, recon­structive and oncologic procedures are complicated by the anatomy and structure of the auricle [1].
M. Altıntaş et al.

15.2 Benign Tumors

15.2.1 Chondrodermatitis Nodularis Chronica Helicis
“Chondrodermatitis nodularis chronica helicis,” formerly known as “Winkler’s disease,” is a painful benign condition of the auricle. Macroscopically, a tiny, sometimes ulcerated nodule appears on the pinna, most commonly on the upper part of the helix. This benign ulcerated nodule can be confused with malignancy as it may clinically and histologically resemble squamous cell carcinoma. Although the disease more commonly occurs in middle-aged and elderly men, it can also affect younger adults and women. Although the exact cause of the lesions is unknown, cartilage ischemia is likely a contributing factor. Acute inammation, followed by cartilage necrosis and epidermal ulceration likely results from occlusion of the small arteries of the perichondrium, as the helix being one of the farthest points from the source of arterial blood supply to the auricle. An association between systemic sclerosis and helical chondrodermati­tis has been documented. Small artery obstructive changes are common in this disease [11].
Sleeping over the affected side and, more recently, the use of restrictive headgear, headphones, and Bluetooth earpieces have been associated with the development of lesions. It may occur after minor trauma or exposure to cold [12].
Anatomic analysis of representative biopsies reveals ulceration of the auricular skin and total necrosis of the underlying elastic cartilage tip, as seen in the highly represented elastic cartilage beneath the auricular skin. A fragment of necrotic car­tilage is seen extruded at the base of the ulcer. Obstructive thickening of small arter­ies is seen in the perichondrium of the elastic cartilage in the ulcer region. The important differential diagnosis is SCC.However, atypia and pseudo- epitheliomatous hyperplasia may be seen in the epithelium adjacent to the ulcer. Cosmetic consider­ations are important and treatment is surgical [11].
15.2.2 Cystic Chondromalacia
Potentially confused with chondrodermatitis nodularis chronica helicis and SCC, this auricular benign cystic degenerative inammatory disease is best left untreated. In most cases, the lesions do not involve both simultaneously and can be quite large (up to 4cm) and recurrent. A representative sample of auricular cartilage is required for diagnosis. Chondrodermatitis nodularis chronica helicis is the primary differen­tial diagnosis [11].
15 Auricula Tumors
325
15.2.3 Ceruminous Gland Adenoma
Adenoma NOS (ceruminous adenoma), pleomorphic adenoma, and syringocystoma papilliferum are the fth edition histologic categories for benign tumors of the ceru­minous glands. These tumors share some histologic features with the tumor in ques­tion. However, they also show signs of ceruminous differentiation, such as decapitation secretion and yellow ceroid pigment, which are absent in the described tumor. Most of the tumors are glandular in shape and may occasionally develop cysts. As a result of interglandular brosis, lesional cells invade the surrounding stroma. The architec­ture may be solid with features such as papillary or back-to-back glands. Immunostaining, hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections, and luminal epithelial cells are occasionally seen along with outer basal and myoepithelial cells [13]. Tumors have mild nuclear pleomorphism and low-to-moderate cellularity. With small nucleoli and ne granular chromatin, nuclei may be either round or oval. Columnar to cuboidal luminal cells typically have apical caps and decapitate secretions, rich eosinophilic cytoplasm, and well-dened cell borders. Cytoplasmic granules of ceroid pigment, a golden yellow or brownish color, are seen in most tumor cells [11].

15.3 Malign Tumors

15.3.1 Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC)
A common form of skin cancer, basal cell carcinoma (BCC), develops in the basal layer of the epidermis and its extensions (Fig.15.1). Because BCC is aggressive, destructive, and locally invasive, this tumor requires treatment. Radiation therapy, cryotherapy, topical medications, photodynamic therapy (PDT), curettage and elec­trodesiccation (C&E), surgical excision, and Mohs micrographic surgery are some of the treatment options for BCC.The choice of treatment is inuenced by tumor characteristics such as location, size, pathology, treatment tolerance, cost, and also patient preference [14].
Characteristics Associated with Minimal Likelihood of Recurrence
According to the “2021 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)” clini­cal practice guidelines for cutaneous BCC, the following factors can be used to identify BCCs that are less likely to recur after treatment [15]:
• Location and size
– Trunk and extremity lesions (excluding genitalia, pretibial area, hands, and
feet) having a diameter of <20mm.
• Pathology
– Supercial or nodular “histopathologic growth pattern,” other less common
“nonaggressive growth patterns” (“cystic infundibula, broepithelioma of pinkus”)
– Absence of “perineural invasion”
326
Fig. 15.1 Ulcerative and inltrative basal cell carcinoma of skin and brous and chondroid tissue
M. Altıntaş et al.
• Other
– “Primary lesion” (nonrecurrent) – Clinically “well-dened” margins – No history of radiotherapy at the site – Immunocompromised patient
Pretreatment Evaluation
The rst and foremost consideration when deciding on a course of treatment for BCC should be the likelihood of lesion recurrence. This includes taking a thorough history (including any previous lesions, immunosuppressive drug use, and comor­bidities), performing an elaborate physical examination, and nally performing a biopsy of the suspicious lesion [14].
Risk assessment and lesion biopsies; A skin biopsy is necessary to confirm the diagnosis of BCC and to provide additional information about the risk of tumor recurrence after therapy. However, an experienced clinician can usually make a diagnosis based on clinical and dermoscopic examination alone. Prior to destructive or nonsurgical treatment, a diagnostic confirmatory biopsy of the lesion is critical, especially in patients who are not candidates for sur­gery [14].
15 Auricula Tumors
327
The Choice of Treatment
A variety of surgical and non-surgical therapies can be used to treat BCC [16]. The following factors [14] inuence strategy for treating BCC patients with a low likeli­hood of recurrence:
Aggressive treatment of BCC with a low recurrence risk may result in unneces­sary suffering, treatment and travel expenses, and disruption of the patient’s family and occupational life. On the contrary, inadequate treatment of aggressive lesions can result in recurrence, which can be devastating.
Surgical excision is usually recommended as rst-line treatment for BCC with a low recurrence risk [17]. Taking into account the following [14] may indicate that other methods are more appropriate for some patients:
• The patient’s age, immunosuppression, and comorbidities
• The location of the tumor
• Factors related to the tumor (such as whether it is supercial or nodular, or
whether there are one or many lesions)
• How things seem and work
• Whether certain methods or experts are readily available
• The relative effectiveness and cost of different treatments
When choosing a treatment, it is important to consider patient-specic consider­ations. Patients’ ability to tolerate surgical intervention, manage wounds, apply topical therapies, and comply with follow-up visits are all affected by their physical or functional limitations and inuence their therapeutic choices.
It is important to consider the different treatment options. Alternative therapies may be more appropriate for patients who prefer not to undergo curettage and elec­trodesiccation (C&E) because of the risk of pigmentary changes and scarring [14].
The Standard Surgical Excision
The recommended initial treatment for primary, nodular, or supercial BCC less than a diameter of 20mm found over the trunk and extremities (with the exception of the genitals, pretibial area, hands, or feet) is conventional surgical excision fol­lowed by evaluation of the surgical margin. Margins between 4 and 5mm are gener­ally considered adequate [14].
Other treatments are equally effective but less time consuming and expensive. For example, Mohs surgery is not necessary for primary BCC over the trunk or extremities that don’t have aggressive histopathologic or clinical features [14].
The usual method of healing is immediate closure of the surgical incision or transplantation of nearby tissue or skin. As a result, wounds can heal in as little as one to two weeks. The availability and elasticity of adjacent tissues, the size, loca­tion, and depth of the defect, and clinician and patient preference are among the variables that determine the type of closure [14].
In 2010, a meta-analysis evaluated 37 studies that were mostly observational and found 4–5mm margins to be appropriate [18]. The mean recurrence rates were 0.4,
1.6, 2.6, and 4% for BCCs excised with a surgical margin of 5, 4, 3, and 2mm,
328
M. Altıntaş et al.
respectively, according to the analysis of pooled data obtained from 10,261 indi­viduals having 16,066 nodular BCCs of low-risk treated with surgical excision [18]. Surgical margins of 3–5mm resulted in similarly high rates of pathologically veri­ed complete excisions [14].
15.3.2 Squamous Cell Carcinoma
According to research by Clayman etal., SCC accounts for 87% of all cases, with 18% of these cases involving the auricle. The most extensive carcinoma was
17.0cm [19], while the average size was 2.0cm at diagnosis. Another study of patients diagnosed with SCC of the external ear canal and middle ear revealed that 87% of the patients had bone erosion, and 1% of patients had metastases [20, 21] (Fig.15.2).
The histologic appearance of external and middle ear SCC is identical to that of any other specied site of the body. Lesions on the skin of the auricle are immediately visible whereas the skin of the external auditory canal (EAC) is out of sight and difcult to examine or biopsy. The goal of auricular surgery is to achieve the best result cosmetically while preserving organs: inadequate biopsy specimens and lack of expertise in their interpretation cause problems in the diagnosis of EAC lesions. Due to the late presentation of the lesions and the potential need for major surgery, surgical procedures represent the majority of treatment. Surgical pathologists have difculty interpreting tumor size for stag­ing and margin assessment based on histologic evaluation of resected specimens. With its complicated anatomy and method of macroscopic inspection, SCC of the ear and temporal bone has recently been the subject of an update on examina­tion and staging [21]. Tumors requiring surgical intervention at this site other than SCC may also benet from the approach and procedures [11].
Fig. 15.2 Inltrative squamous cell carcinoma of the auricle
15 Auricula Tumors
329
15.3.3 Ceruminous Gland Adenocarcinoma
This group includes cancers that develop in the ceruminous glands of the external ear. Adenocarcinoma NOS (“ceruminous adenocarcinoma”), “ceruminous adenoid cystic carcinoma”, and “ceruminous mucoepidermoid carcinoma” are the three separate histologic forms included. The histology of “adenoid cystic carcinoma and mucoepidermoid carcinoma” is identical to that of salivary gland carcinoma [11].
The middle ear and mastoid cavity are the only sites where adenoid cystic car­cinoma has been reported [22]. A preponderance of tubular and cribriform mor­phology characterizes low-grade tumors. In contrast, high-grade tumors are dened as those with solid morphology in at least 30% of the tumor area. In addition to morphology, other factors inuence prognosis. Surgery may not be able to cure low-grade tumors that have spread to inaccessible areas, such as the temporal bone. Adenoid cystic carcinoma is associated with fusions between the “MYB, MYBL1, and NF1B genes,” which are also present in metastases [23]. “MYB-NF1B gene fusion,” which upregulates MYB, is found to be specic to adenoid cystic carci­noma only. Immunohistochemistry has shown cases of MYB overexpression, but the specicity of these cases has been inconsistent [24]. In addition to HPV­associated sinonasal carcinoma [25], other tumor types have been found to express MYB by immunohistochemistry, including “basaloid squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell adenocarcinoma, and myoepithelial epithelial carcinoma” [26]. According to a recent study, a negative immunostaining result for MYB could indicate that the tumor would have a poorer prognosis. According to the same study, cytoplasmic beta-catenin positivity may increase tumor-associated mortality risk [27].

15.4 Conclusion

Benign and malignant tumors of the tissues in this region can be encountered in the auricula as in our entire body. The most common ones are skin and cartilage tumors. The advantage of this area is that, due to its visually observable location, the tumor can be noticed even when it is very small, and early application to the physician can be made. Another advantage is that total excision is possible. Since it is located in the end organ location, distant metastasis is not common.

References

1. Özgür E, Kamiloğlu U, Temiz P, Eskiizmir G.Skin cancers of the auricle: a retrospective analysis of 41 patients. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Sep;58(3):169–73.
2. Eisemann N, Waldmann A, Geller AC, et al. Non-melanoma skin cancer incidence and impact of skin cancer screening on incidence. J Invest Dermatol. 2014;134:43–50. https://doi.
org/10.1038/jid.2013.304.
3. Arons MS, Savin RC.Auricular cancer. Some surgical and pathologic considerations. Am J Surg. 1971;122:770–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002- 9610(71)90445- 4.
330
4. Apalla Z, Lallas A, Sotiriou E, Lazaridou E, Ioannides D.Epidemiological trends in skin can­cer. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2017;7:1–6. https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.0702a01.
5. Brantsch KD, Meisner C, Schonsch B, etal. Analysis of risk factors determining prognosis of cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma: a prospective study. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:713–20.
6. Gallagher RP, Hill GB, Bajdik CD, et al. Sunlight exposure, pigmentary factors, and risk ofnonmelanocytic skin cancer. I Basal cell carcinoma Arch Dermatol. 1995;131:157–63.
https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1995.01690140041006.
7. Madan V, Lear JT, Szeimies RM.Non-melanoma skin cancer. Lancet. 2010;375:673–85.
8. Fattahi TT. An overview of facial aesthetic units. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Oct;61(10):1207–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278- 2391(03)00684- 0.
9. Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day CL Jr. Prognostic factors for local recurrence, metastasis, and survival rates in squamous cell carcinomaof the skin, ear, and lip. Implications for treatment modality selection. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;26:976–90.
10. Veness MJ.Dening patients with high-risk cutaneous squamouscell carcinoma. Australas J Dermatol. 2006;47:28–33.
11. Sandison A.Update from the 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classication of Head and Neck Tumours: Tumours of the ear. Head Neck Pathol. 2022 Mar;16(1):76–86.
12. Salah H, Urso B, Khachemoune A.Review of the etiopathogenesis and management options of chondrodermatitis nodularis chronica helicis. Cureus. 2018;10(3):e2367.
13. Oga Ogawa K, Nakamura K, Hatano K, etal. Treatment and prognosis of squamous cell carci­noma of the external auditory canal and middle ear: a multi-institutional retrospective review of 87 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68(5):1326–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
ijrobp.2007.01.052.
14. Aasi SZ. Treatment and prognosis of basal cell carcinoma at low risk of recurrence. In: Stern RS, Robinson JK, Corona R (Eds). UpToDate. Last updated: Oct 11, 2024. https://
e1c9b1a9cc9b2679354d789c7627a4c889c411cc.vetisonline.com/contents/treatment­and-prognosis-of-basal-cell-carcinoma-at-low-risk-of-recurrence?search=Treatment%20 and%20prognosis%20of%20basal%20cell%20carcinoma%20at%20low%20risk%20of%20 recurrence&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1%7E150&usage_type=default&display_
(Accessed online at January 7th, 2025).
15. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Basal cell skin cancer. Version 2.2021. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/
nmsc.pdf. Accessed on 13 Aug 2021.
16. Cameron MC, Lee E, Hibler BP, et al. Basal cell carcinoma: Contemporary approaches to diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80:321.
17. Peris K, Fargnoli MC, Garbe C, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of basal cell carcinoma: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guidelines. Eur J Cancer. 2019;118:10.
18. Gulleth Y, Goldberg N, Silverman RP, Gastman BR.What is the best surgical margin for a basal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1222.
19. Clayman GL, Lee JJ, Holsinger FC, etal. Mortality risk from squamous cell skin cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Feb;23(4):759–65. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.02.155.
20. Kloss B, Lapoint J, Dougher K.Auricular squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;8(4):50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1865- 1380- 4- 50.
21. Allanson BM, Low TH, Clark JR, Gupta R.Squamous cell carcinoma of the external Auditory Canal and temporal bone: an update. Head Neck Pathol. 2018;12(3):407–18. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s12105- 018- 0908- 4.
22. Zhang J, Tingting H, Jin Y, Xianmin W, Li H, Xiaoyun C.A rare case of adenoid cystic carci­noma isolated in the mastoid. J Int Adv Otol. 2019 Apr;15(1):177–80. https://doi.org/10.5152/
iao.2019.6036.
23. Andreasen S, Agander TK, Bjørndal K, etal. Genetic rearrangements, hotspot mutations, and microRNA expression in the progression of metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma of the sali­vary gland. Oncotarget. 2018;9(28):19675–87. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24800.
M. Altıntaş et al.
15 Auricula Tumors
24. West RB, Kong C, Clarke N, etal. MYB expression and translocation in adenoid cystic carci­nomas and other salivary gland tumors with clinicopathologic correlation. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35(1):92–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182002777.
25. Shah AA, Oliai BR, Bishop JA.Consistent LEF-1 and MYB immunohistochemical expression in human papillomavirus-related multiphenotypic sinonasal carcinoma: a potential diagnostic pitfall. Head Neck Pathol. 2019;13(2):220–4.
26. Brill LB 2nd, Kanner WA, Fehr A, et al. Analysis of MYB expression and MYB-NFIB gene fusions in adenoid cystic carcinoma and other salivary neoplasms. Mod Pathol. 2011;24(9):1169–76. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2011.86.
27. Park S, Vora M, van Zante A, etal. Clinicopathologic implications of Myb and Beta-catenin expression in adenoid cystic carcinoma. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;49(1):48. https://
doi.org/10.1186/s40463- 020- 00446- 1.
331
Part IV
Middle Ear Pathologies and Management

Acute Suppurative Otitis Media

16
AliBudak, CemalCingi, andKevinA.Peng

16.1 Introduction

In childhood infections, otitis media (OM) ranks second only to upper respiratory infections (URIs) in frequency. Additionally, OM is the most common reason for pediatric visits to the doctor. Not including trips to the emergency room, an esti­mated 16 million ofce visits per year are linked to OM [1].
Any middle ear inammation, regardless of its cause or origin, is termed OM.Each subtype has a unique history, course, symptoms, and physical manifesta­tions [1]. In this chapter, we discuss the spectrum of OM, with a focus on acute suppurative otitis media, sometimes more simply termed acute otitis media (AOM).

16.2 Pathophysiology

Because the mucociliary system of the middle ear includes the mucosa at the pha­ryngeal end of the Eustachian tube (ET), malfunction of the ET is the most critical factor causing middle ear disease. When edema, tumors, or negative intratympanic pressure interfere with this mucosa, infectious processes can directly extend from the nasopharynx to the middle ear, resulting in OM.Direct mechanical disruption of
A. Budak Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
C. Cingi (*) Faculty of Medical, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Türkiye
K. A. Peng House Clinic and House Institute Foundation, Los Angeles, CA, USA e-mail: kpeng@houseclinic.com
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024 M. T. Kalcioglu et al. (eds.), Otology Updates, Comprehensive ENT,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76173-7_16
335