Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4507_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
34 Мб
Скачать
128
E. Kösemihal et al.
Table 8.1 Denitions of the terms used in audiometric evaluation
Name Denition Audiometry Measurement of hearing range
and hearing sensitivity Audiometer Name of the test equipment Audiogram Chart with marked hearing
thresholds
lowest levels of sensitivity, which are called hearing thresholds, are plotted on an audiogram graph. Relevant terms are listed in Table8.1.
Pure-tone audiometry involves air conduction measurement and bone conduc­tion measurement. In the air conduction test, the stimulus is presented with either a supra-aural or an insert earphone. For these transducers, sound travels through the external ear canal and middle ear system to the cochlea. In the bone conduction test, a bone oscillator (vibrator) is used as a transducer. The oscillator is placed on the mastoid process of the temporal bone. It vibrates the bones of the skull, stimulating the right and left cochleae directly (causing displacement of the basilar membrane), thereby activating the auditory system bilaterally [8, 9].
For pure-tone audiometry, rst, a sound that the patient can hear comfortably (typically 30–40dB HL for people with normal hearing) is presented. This is called the familiarization phase. The patient is instructed to press a button on hearing this sound (signal). According to age, the responding method can change (e.g., raising the hand). It is important for the patient to respond to the softest sound they can hear. If the patient responds, the intensity level is decreased by 10dB.If there is no response, the intensity level is increased by 5dB to determine the threshold. This is referred to as the “down10, up-5” method. At least two correct responses from up to three presentations during an ascending series of tone presentations are required at the same intensity level to establish that the hearing threshold is at that inten­sity level.
The hearing test begins with a familiar tone, at 1000 Hz (mid-frequency). However, the test may begin at lower frequencies, such as 250Hz if a severe-to­profound loss is suspected. If the test begins at 1000Hz, it will progress sequen­tially to higher frequencies. Lower test frequencies (500, 250, and 125Hz) are then measured. The rst frequency measured may be reevaluated to ensure patient con­sistency. For behavioral audiometry, the audiologist starts with measures of the air conduction thresholds for the right and left ears, followed by bone conduction pure­tone audiometry. The same procedure is used to determine thresholds [9].
Hearing thresholds are plotted on an audiogram. This graph represents the range of 10 to 120dB HL intensity levels on the vertical axis and the frequency range of 125–8000Hz on the horizontal axis (Fig. 8.1a). Three pieces of information are used to dene the hearing level obtained after the test. These are the degree, type, and conguration of hearing loss.
A conguration is described as a at, curved, rising, sloping, cookie bite, or cor­ner audiogram. A at audiogram shows thresholds within 20dB at all frequencies tested. A sloping audiogram is characterized by thresholds worsening by 20dB or more from low to high frequencies. In a rising audiogram, hearing thresholds are
a
b
8 Behavioral andElectrophysiological Tests inAudiology
129
Fig. 8.1 (a) An example of an audiogram showing mild-to-severe hearing loss. The speech banana includes the frequencies and intensities of speech sounds that individuals can hear. (b) Examples of audiometric congurations that vary according to the type of hearing loss
worse at lower frequencies, with a difference of more than 20dB relative to higher frequencies (Fig.8.1b). A notched audiogram conguration is characterized by a signicant decrease in one frequency compared to adjacent octave frequencies. If a
130
E. Kösemihal et al.
notch is seen at 2000Hz for bone conduction, this is called Carhart’s notch (indica­tive of ossicular xation). The corner-type audiogram is characterized by having a high-intensity hearing threshold only at low frequencies and no response at high frequencies. This is characteristic of profound hearing loss.
Audiometric congurations are essential for determining etiologies and diagno­ses. Conductive hearing loss (CHL) typically has a rising conguration in middle ear infections. Otosclerosis, another cause of CHL, is associated with a bone con­duction notch at 2000Hz. A sensorineural notch in the 4000-Hz region is critical for diagnosing noise-induced hearing loss, which may also include a drop at 3000 or 6000Hz. A presbycusis (age-related hearing loss) conguration is typically charac­terized by gradual, sloping sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) at higher frequen­cies. An SNHL with a rising conguration may relate to the possibility of acquired hearing loss due to Meniere’s disease, but it is also seen in some forms of hereditary hearing loss.
The degree of hearing loss is used to classify hearing ability. Normal hearing refers to thresholds from 10 to 25dB HL.Thresholds >25dB HL are outside the normal range [10]. Some professional bodies, including the American Speech– Language–Hearing Association (ASHA), more strictly dene the normal hearing range as 10 to 15 dB HL (https://www.asha.org/public/hearing/Degree- of-
Hearing- Loss). In children, the upper limit for the normal range is 15 dB
HL.Different researchers have developed classications for the degree of hearing loss. Table8.2 shows the classications developed by Goodman (1965), Jerger and Jerger (1980), and Clark (1981). The classication developed by Northern and Downs in 2002 can be primarily used to highlight slight hearing loss [7, 1114]. The type of hearing loss can be determined by comparing air conducted and bone con­ducted thresholds as either conductive, sensorineural, or mixed hearing loss. Further assessment with speech audiometry and electrophysiological tests can help differ­entiate cochlear from retrocochlear types of sensorineural hearing loss.
The term “speech banana” shows the power distribution of the phonemes used in speech plotted on the audiogram (Fig.8.1a). It is called thus because the area where the vowel formants and the main energy of consonants are located resembles the shape of a banana. Although the use of speech changes, the physiological process of sound production remains the same across languages, and, hence, the speech banana
Table 8.2 Classications of hearing loss
Goodman
Degree of hearing loss (PTA)
Normal <26 <21 -10 to 15 <16 Slight 16–25 16–25 Mild 26–40 21–40 26–40 26–30 Moderate 41–55 41–60 41–55 30–50 Moderately severe 56–70 56–70 Severe 71–90 61–80 71–90 51–70 Profound >90 >80 >90 >70
(1965) Hearing loss range (dB)
Jerger and Jerger (1980)
Clark (1981)
Northern and Downs (2002)
8 Behavioral andElectrophysiological Tests inAudiology
131
can be considered universal, with some caveats. For example, differences in the phonetic structure across languages can cause differences in the nature and distribu­tion of speech sounds within the speech banana [14].
The pure-tone average (PTA) is routinely calculated to determine the degree of hearing loss. It is determined by averaging the threshold values at 500, 1000, and 2000Hz (PTA1). PTA2 is determined by the average of four frequencies: 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000Hz. PTA2 may be preferred, especially for high-frequency hearing losses, to monitor how the hearing loss affects the audibility of speech sounds. PTA helps measure and determine the degree of hearing loss by assessing the difference in pure-tone thresholds and speech audibility between the ears.
When the audiometric assessment is completed, it is important to explain the patient’s hearing status based on the audiogram. The following are examples of phrases that can be used to explain the hearing status of a patient with increased hearing loss at higher frequencies.
We gave you a hearing test in a quiet testing room and found the softest levels (hearing
thresholds) that you heard each tone, and plotted these levels on this graph. This graph is
called an audiogram. The audiogram has tones (frequencies) from low to high pitch on the
X-axis and intensity levels from softest at the top to loudest at the bottom on the Y-axis. Red
indicates thresholds for the right ear and blue indicates thresholds for the left ear [6]. Blue
and red symbols in the 0 to 25 decibels (or 15 decibels) range show normal hearing.
However, as you can see, you are not hearing well enough to detect high-pitched sounds in
both ears. This makes it difcult for you to hear speech sounds such as /s/, /sh/ and can
cause complaints such as ‘I can hear, but I can't understand.’
8.4.1.1 Masking
A “mask” is the term used in audiology to describe a distinct stimulus that raises an acoustically obtained threshold. Masking is the presentation of noise to the non-test ear (better ear) during audiometry to make it “busy” while assessing the test ear. This is necessary when there is asymmetry in air conduction thresholds or a gap between air and bone conduction thresholds. In these cases, when the stimulus is presented to the ear being tested, it may be at an intensity level that can be heard by the better ear. To prevent this, acoustic masking is required of the non-test ear. To test hearing thresholds when masking is being used, the patient is instructed to ignore the masking noise and respond only to the tones.
The noise used for masking is typically narrow-band noise in the frequency range of the pure-tone signal. While the stimulus is presented to the test ear, the noise is presented to the non-test ear. The air and bone conduction thresholds of the poorer ear can be determined by carefully presenting the stimulus and noise at the appropriate levels. Accurate masking levels are critical for accurate hearing thresh­old measurements. The “masking dilemma” occurs in cases with bilateral conduc­tive hearing losses with an air-bone gap >40dB, where it is possible for the masking in the non-test ear to cross over through the skull and affect the hearing threshold in the test ear. Masking can also be difcult for certain patients, such as young chil­dren, who may not understand the instructions [4, 10].
132
E. Kösemihal et al.
The test signal may be heard in the non-test ear under the following conditions, and, in these cases, masking should be performed for the non-test ear:
– For supra-aural headphones, when there is 40dB (60dB for insert earphones) or
greater threshold difference between the air conduction threshold of the test ear
and the bone conduction threshold at that frequency in the non-test ear.
– If both air conduction thresholds are 15dB or greater than the bone conduction
threshold at a given frequency (an “air–bone gap”).
Three essential variables must be known in order to perform masking correctly. These are interaural attenuation (IA) for the transducers being used, threshold lev­els, and effective masking levels. Stimuli presented through the air undergo IA (attenuation in sound energy across the skull) as they travel to the non-test ear. If the stimulus is loud enough to be heard by the cochlea of the non-test ear, cross-hearing occurs. For example, in the case of severe unilateral hearing loss, the unmasked air conduction audiogram will reect a shadow of the normal ear, misleadingly indicat­ing a much lower degree of hearing loss in the ear with severe hearing loss.
There are signicant differences in IA values depending on the type of trans­ducer. The IA of supra-aural headphones commonly used in the clinic (e.g., TDH39) is considered to be 40dB.Insert earphones have the highest IA of 60dB and there­fore have less need for masking [8]. Disposable foam probes, which are attached to the end of insert earphones and changed from patient to patient, provide comfort and effectively prevent the spread of infection in the ear. However, insert earphones may only be available in some clinics, and their use requires the ear canal to be clear of signicant wax obstruction. Supra-aural headphones may cause the ear canal to collapse in pediatric and geriatric populations. This can create a pseudo air–bone gap, especially at high frequencies. Because the insert headphones are placed in the ear canal, this collapse does not occur, which is another advantage over supra-aural headphones.
The IA value for oscillator (vibrator) bone conduction transducers is 0dB.The contralateral and ipsilateral cochleae can receive stimuli delivered by a bone vibra­tor placed on either mastoid with little or no attenuation. Masking is usually required to determine ear-specic bone conduction thresholds when the air–bone gap exceeds 10dB [4, 8, 15].
Generally, air and bone conduction thresholds must be determined for both ears to determine which ear and frequencies to mask and the minimum/maximum mask noise levels to avoid under- and over-masking. The difference between the bone conduction threshold of one ear and the air conduction threshold of the other ear, the difference between the bone conduction thresholds of the two ears, and the differ­ence between the air and bone conduction thresholds of the same ear can be used to determine which thresholds require masking in order to establish the true threshold [4, 15]. For symmetrical bilateral hearing losses, where the bone conduction thresh­old for one ear is within 10dB of the air conduction threshold at that frequency in both ears, masking is not required as neither ear shows an air–bone gap and the
8 Behavioral andElectrophysiological Tests inAudiology
133
symmetrical hearing loss means that recorded thresholds do not reect “cross­hearing” from a better ear.
The amount of effective masking is also important. The masking level is cali­brated so that an increase in masking noise by 5dB in the non-test ear will raise the threshold by 5dB in the test ear, if the response is coming from the non-test ear. In the plateau masking method, the noise level is raised several times until a stable test ear threshold is recorded. Narrow-band noise is used for masking to determine accurate air and bone conduction thresholds in diagnostic audiology [4,
15]. Audiometers should be calibrated by the manufacturer or the calibration lab-
oratory to deliver appropriate levels of masking, known as “effective masking levels.” The level of narrow-band noise required to effectively mask a tone is usu­ally a few decibels above the level of the tone and is specied in audiometric standards.
8.4.2 Speech Audiometry
Speech audiometry is a valuable method for assessing the functional perception and hearing ability of people with hearing loss. It more accurately reects the individu­al’s hearing function during daily listening than pure-tone audiometry. It is evalu­ated using speech stimuli and tests that include threshold and supra-threshold measurements. It can be used to cross-check thresholds obtained with pure-tone audiometry, to indicate the location of the lesion causing the hearing loss, to evalu­ate the efcacy of hearing aids and/or cochlear implantation, and to assess central auditory processing abilities. Testing can be done by monitored live speech or by using recorded words. The use of recorded materials standardizes the testing proce­dure and is preferred to eliminate speaker variability and standardize intensity lev­els. Testing supra-threshold speech recognition with recorded materials has become more accessible with the use of digital recordings that can be delivered via an exter­nal device such as a laptop or incorporated directly into audiometer software. The use of carrier phrases is common for speech testing using recorded words. A carrier phrase such as “Say the word ...” is used to draw attention to the word to be repeated. The carrier phrase is present in the recorded material but can also be included when using monitored live speech. The carrier phrase that precedes the test word should cause the audiometer volume unit (VU) meter to peak at 0dB, with the test word then delivered at the same level.
Three basic tests of speech audiometry are routinely used in conjunction with pure-tone audiometry: Speech Awareness Threshold (SAT), Speech Reception Threshold (SRT), and Word Recognition Score (WRS). The intensity levels used for speech testing are expressed in dB HL.If both supra-aural and insert earphones are used for speech testing, they should be calibrated separately as the threshold levels for speech vary between these transducers. A description of the routinely used tests is provided in Table8.3.
The SRT and PTA should correlate closely, with a maximum difference of ±7dB between thresholds. If there is a larger discrepancy between PTA and SRT, it must
134
Table 8.3 Basic speech audiometry tests
Test name Explanation Speech
Awareness Threshold (SAT)
Speech Reception Threshold (SRT)
Word Recognition Score (WRS)
Most Comfortable Level (MCL)
Loudness Discomfort Level (LDL)
The lowest hearing level is when the presented sounds, syllables, or words are noticed. Speech stimuli such as “ba-ba,” “da-da” /a/, /u/, /sh/, and //s/ are presented. The frequency characteristic of the stimulus is used to determine the individual’s hearing threshold at that frequency. For example, the /sh/ phoneme reects around 3000Hz
The SRT is the lowest intensity level at which the subject can repeat 50% of the words presented. The words typically consist of two syllables with equal stress on both syllables (spondees). The test begins at a comfortably recognizable level. The intensity level is decreased by 10dB after each correct repetition. The speech reception threshold is the lowest intensity that can be repeated. The SRT usually correlates with pure-tone thresholds at 500 and 1000Hz
The WRS is determined using an open-ended test that evaluates speech recognition. Approximately 40dB is added to the PTA or SRT, and stimuli consisting of 25 monosyllabic words are presented to the patient through the audiometer. Words are presented via a microphone (live audio) or as recorded material. The number of words repeated correctly is counted, and the result is expressed as a percentage. The WRS is 80% when 20 of the 25 words are repeated correctly
Loudness rating is used to determine the most comfortable listening level for the patient. The test begins by adding 25–40dB to the speech understanding threshold. The patient is asked to listen to the audiologist’s voice by either increasing or decreasing the intensity. The comfortable level is determined using the phrase “The sound is low, loud, or most comfortable.” The WRS test is performed at this level
LDL is the level at which the patient cannot tolerate the presented sound and becomes uncomfortable. It is also referred to as the uncomfortable level (UCL). It is performed with both speech and pure-tone stimuli. The patient is told that the sound level will gradually increase and is asked to indicate the level at which he or she becomes uncomfortable. LDL is approximately 100–110dB HL for people with normal hearing. It is used in hearing aid tting and auditory rehabilitation planning
E. Kösemihal et al.
be investigated to rule out patient-related or technical problems. Repeating the test instructions to the patient may be the rst step in the investigation [16].
The WRS test evaluates speech recognition rather than language comprehension or understanding. Hearing losses vary in WRS based on the type of pathology, degree of hearing loss, and hearing conguration. The WRS test is not designed to distinguish between two similar sounds or words; this test simply requires the patient to recognize the word. For this reason, it is more accurate to use the term “word recognition,” rather than “speech discrimination.”
Phonemically balanced (PB) word lists are typically used for WRS.These lists are designed to represent how vowels and consonants occur naturally in a given language. Historically, 20 lists of 50 words called phonetically balanced (PB-50) [17] were used in English. There are a number of different word lists, including those created by the Central Institute of Deaf-22 (CID W-22) in the 1950s [18]; 4 phonetically balanced lists of 50 words (200 words in total) were created using
8 Behavioral andElectrophysiological Tests inAudiology
135
words from this list. Using the Northwestern University Number 6 (NU No. 6) test, Lehiste and Peterson (1959) produced 4 different lists of 50 phonemically balanced words in a consonant–nucleus–consonant (CNC) structure [19]. Both lists are still in use today.
In addition to word recognition tests, nonsense syllable/phoneme recognition tests can be used to test speech perception, reducing the advantage of word content and word familiarity for patients with more advanced language skills. Nonsense syllables are used in the consonant–vowel (CV) or vowel–consonant (VC) format. The most prominent of these materials are the City University of New York Nonsense Syllable Test (CUNY-NST) [20] and the Nonsense Syllable Test (NST) [21].
Sentence tests are also widely used—sentences better reect everyday commu­nication in which listeners have access to semantic, syntactic, and lexical cues, in contrast to monosyllabic or nonsense syllables. For this reason, sentence materials are widely preferred for hearing aid/cochlear implant applications. The most com­mon of these sentence tests is the CID Everyday Sentences [22], developed by Silverman and Hirsh (1955), consisting of 10 lists of 10 sentences, with each con­taining questions, commands, and statements with 50 keywords in each list. This test is scored by calculating the percentage of keywords correctly identied. In addi­tion to these tests, which are administered in a quiet environment, there are also sentence tests that are administered in noise.
Speech testing in noise has become increasingly popular. The most common problem for people with hearing loss is understanding speech in noise. People with hearing loss require a higher signal-to-noise (SNR or S/N) ratio to understand speech than people with normal hearing, and this effect is even greater for children with hearing loss. There is variation across tests; however, studies have shown that in general, for every 1-dB increase in speech signal over background noise, there is a 3% improvement in signal recognition. Increasing the S/N ratio by 10 or 12dB improves speech understanding by 30% [23].
The Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) and the Quick Speech in Noise (QuickSIN) are common sentences in noise tests [24, 25], and the AzBio Sentence Test is becoming increasingly popular [26]. The Synthetic Sentence Identication Test (SSI), the Speech Perception in Noise Test (SPIN), and the Connected Speech Test are additional sentence tests with specic applications [2729].
The Matrix Test is an innovative approach to sentence testing developed in Swedish by Hagerman in 1982, which has been translated and made available in many languages on the basis of validity and reliability studies [30]. It uses an adap­tive psychophysical method that measures speech recognition ability in either quiet or noise using sentence materials that are syntactically consistent but semantically unpredictable. The speech recognition threshold in noise is determined using an adaptive signal-to-noise method to measure the S/N ratio in decibels. This and other speech in noise tests can be performed via headphones or through loudspeakers in a free eld, with speech and noise presented from the same or different directions. Testing in the free eld better reects the communication environment and skills needed for listening in real life.
136
E. Kösemihal et al.
The developmental, rather than chronological, age of the child determines which speech test to administer. Speech tests can be administered to children similarly to adults, but tests administered to infants and toddlers who cannot cooperate are different. In infants, speech stimuli can be presented during behav­ioral observation audiometry (BOA) and visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA). During BOA testing, reexive or other behaviors can be observed in response to moderately loud speech stimuli (e.g., stop suckling, startle, eye widening); how­ever, these behaviors are difcult to observe and reect the minimal response rather than threshold levels in young infants. VRA can be used to measure speech detection thresholds in children who are able to make a reliable conditioned head turn. Preschool children who recognize a speech stimulus but cannot repeat it can be given instructions such as “Show me your mouth, show me your nose.” Using a closed-set testing method, children can be asked to point to pictures or objects when they hear a word. The sounds /a/, /i/, /u/, /s/, /sh/, and /m/, known as Ling sounds, include low-, medium-, and high-frequency speech regions [31]. The Ling test is often used to assess the audibility of speech sounds in individuals with suspected or conrmed hearing loss or in those using hearing aids or implants. VRA or play audiometry can be used to check detection of Ling sounds in young children.
Word recognition ability is usually good in CHL, when speech stimuli are pre­sented at sufciently loud intensity levels because normal cochlear function is pres­ent. By increasing the stimulus intensity, it should be possible for the word recognition score to be either close or equal to normal hearing at a level that is comfortably loud for the patient.
Cochlear dysfunction is associated with a lower WRS compared to CHL.Patients with retrocochlear dysfunction typically have exhibit poorer word recognition per­formance, depending on the degree of neural hearing loss. Speech audiometric tests, especially word recognition tests, are more sensitive to neural hearing loss than pure-tone audiometry. WRS decreases when the signal intensity level increases when there is neural pathology, which is known as the “rollover phenomenon.” The intensity level at which the WRS is at its highest is called PB max. The intensity above PB max at which the WRS is lowest is called PB min. Rollover can be calcu­lated by determining (PBmin-PB max)/PB max. The results are consistent with neural abnormalities when the ratio exceeds 0.35 or 0.45. This may vary depending on the test material used [16].
Central auditory processing disorders (CAPDs) can result in difculties in understanding speech or other complex sounds such as music in the absence of reduced hearing sensitivity. In auditory processing disorders (APDs), the auditory brain is unable to distinguish between certain sounds and to interpret some or all of the sound information received by the auditory system. Differences may be observed in speech tests depending on the location and degree of pathology.
8 Behavioral andElectrophysiological Tests inAudiology
137
Signicant differences can be observed between speech tests performed in quiet and noise. For this reason, it is important to use speech in noise tests when CAPD is suspected.
8.4.3 Pediatric Assessment
Developmentally appropriate testing techniques and strategies should be used in the pediatric population. Age-appropriate behavioral assessment techniques can be used for children older than about 6months of age (VRA, play audiometry) and for adults with normal cognitive function. Objective measures are needed to assess hearing in very young children and in children or adults with impaired cognitive function. If infants and young children are unwilling to wear head­phones, tests can be conducted with free-eld loudspeakers; however, every attempt should be made to obtain separate ear information. Insert earphones are preferred when testing young children as they are more comfortable and easier to place on small heads. For free-eld testing, a loudspeaker in the soundproof room can deliver signals to the patient sitting in the calibrated, marked location [32]. The thresholds obtained in the free-eld loudspeaker tests are the thresh­olds of the better ear. Hence, hearing loss can be underestimated or overlooked in the presence of asymmetric or unilateral hearing loss. For this reason, it is essential to evaluate both ears separately using the OAE and auditory brainstem response (ABR) tests described on the following pages if behavioral thresholds have not been obtained for separate ears. In addition to the diagnostic hearing evaluation, free-eld assessment of hearing thresholds with cochlear implants can be performed. If multiple loudspeakers are available, evaluating localization of sound is a useful test of functional hearing for people with hearing aids or implants.
Infants and young children respond to sounds at different levels depending on their age. For example, infants aged 0–6weeks may respond to a warble, modulated tone at 78dB HL, while children aged 21–24months may respond to the same tone at 26dB HL or softer levels. These are the minimum response levels observed in behavioral assessment. The ABR test provides estimated hearing thresholds close to the behavioral hearing threshold, even in new­borns [33].
The techniques used to assess infants and young children vary according to developmental age and/or cognitive ability and are grouped as follows. Even if infants and very young children have normal or near-normal hearing, their response level may be above the threshold. These responses are referred to as the “minimum response level” to avoid confusion with the hearing threshold. Table8.4 lists the behavioral tests that can be used according to age.
The protocol for administering the audiological test battery to children of differ­ent ages is provided in Table8.5 [3436].