Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4464_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Contents
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgments
- •Video List
- •Introduction
- •Need for Early Intervention
- •Epidemiology
- •Discussion Questions
- •Study Questions
- •References
- •Biomedical Ethics: Principles and Practices
- •Summary
- •Introduction
- •Central Nervous System
- •Peripheral Nervous System
- •Anatomy of the Swallowing Mechanism
- •The Normal Swallow
- •Cranial Nerves Involved in Swallowing
- •Sphincters
- •Central Neural Control of Swallowing
- •Respiration and Deglutition
- •Summary
- •Discussion Questions
- •Study Questions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Neurological Disorders
- •Swallowing Disorders Found in Critical Care Patients
- •Esophageal Swallowing Disorders
- •Infectious Diseases
- •Medications and Swallowing Disorders
- •Autoimmune Disorders and Diseases
- •Anterior Cervical Spine Disorders
- •Summary
- •Discussion Questions
- •Study Questions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Neoplasms
- •Head and Neck Surgery
- •Laryngeal Surgery
- •Skull Base Surgery
- •Tracheotomy
- •Swallowing Disorders Following Radiation Therapy
- •Zenker Diverticulum
- •Summary
- •Discussion Questions
- •Study Questions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Evidence-Based Practice
- •Multidisciplinary Dysphagia Team
- •Swallowing Screening
- •Clinical Swallow Evaluation
- •Self-Assessments
- •Related Self-Assessments to Dysphagia
- •Summary
- •Discussion Questions
- •Study Questions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing
- •Modified Barium Swallow
- •Modified Barium Swallow, Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing, and Silent Aspiration
- •Manometry and High-Resolution Manometry
- •Tongue Pressure/Strength Measurement
- •Other Instrumental Tests Associated With Swallowing Disorders
- •Summary
- •Discussion Question
- •Study Questions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Evidence-Based Practice
- •Multidisciplinary Approach to Swallowing Therapy
- •Oral Hygiene
- •Compensatory Swallowing Therapy
- •Rehabilitative Swallowing Therapy
- •Prophylactic Swallowing Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer Survivors
- •Other Swallowing Treatment Methods
- •Summary
- •Discussion Questions
- •Study Questions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Dietitian and Dysphagia
- •Properties of Liquids and Foods
- •Oral Nutrition and Dysphagia Diets
- •Nonoral Diets
- •Malnutrition and Dehydration
- •Summary
- •Discussion Questions
- •Study Questions
- •References
- •Ethical Considerations
- •Summary
- •Discussion Question
- •Study Questions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Aging Process Related to Swallowing
- •Changes in Swallowing
- •Nutrition in the Aging Population
- •Dementia
- •Feeding Assistance
- •Introduction
- •Multidisciplinary Care Team
- •Lactation
- •Prematurity
- •Family Goals for Feeding
- •Caring for Diverse Families
- •Weaning
- •Cross-Disciplinary Educational Opportunities
- •Summary
- •Discussion Questions
- •Study Questions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Etiologies
- •Epidemiology
- •Feeding Versus Swallowing
- •Prematurity
- •Milk to Solids
- •Taking a Case History
- •Intellectual Development
- •Summary
- •Discussion Questions
- •Study Questions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Swallowing Phases
- •Collaborative Goal Setting
- •Growth Faltering
- •Nonoral Feeding
- •Case Illustrations Within Diagnoses
- •Support for Families
- •Summary
- •Discussion Questions
- •Study Questions
- •References
- •Introduction
- •Diagnosis
- •Instrumentation
- •Personnel
- •Facilities
- •Case Studies From Voice and Swallowing Centers
- •Summary
- •Discussion Questions
- •Study Questions
- •References
- •Glossary
- •Answers to Study Questions
- •Index

262 CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF SWALLOWING DISORDERS
FIGURE 11–9. Cranial nerves involved in swallowing.
A child’s age and medical history will dictate
what textures are observed during a swallowing
evaluation. For infants less than 6 months of age,
clinicians will observe breast- or bottle-feeding.
Concerning patterns include choking, disengagement, crying, stridor, and aerophagia. Consider the
evaluation a platform for diagnostic treatment. As
symptoms emerge, work on altering flow and positioning to see if the offered modifications improve
physiological stability. Older children may converse freely about what is challenging for them and
can demonstrate what is problematic. Textures are
represented on the International Dysphagia Diet
Standardisation Initiative.
61
This standardization
improves consistency among clinicians and delivers regulated information to families who will be
modifying foods and beverages at home.
The order in which the textures are offered
should be case dependent. Starting with a less challenging food can permit observation of patterns they
may consider normal when there are, in fact, signs
of dysfunction. Ask the child to describe what they
feel while swallowing. The parents can also provide
a historical account of what reactions occur with specific textures. In the case of profound dysphagia, it
may only be safe to work on secretion management
and taking small ice chips or sips of water without
audible vocal wetness or involuntary coughing.

11. PEDIATRIC DYSPHAGIA: ASSESSMENT OF DISORDERS OF SWALLOWING AND FEEDING 263
FIGURE 11–10. Neurological assessment.
Instrumental Evaluations
Not all pediatric dysphagia consultations will
require an instrumental evaluation. It is particularly
important to ensure functional information will be
gleaned from the exam, which may be distressing
or expose them to radiation. If a child does not
have pulmonary concerns, modifying textures and
behaviors while eating may be the intervention
with future utility of a fluoroscopic or endoscopic
swallowing study as needed. An exception to this
is a young infant who is consuming only breast
milk or formula. If all efforts were made to reduce
aspiration symptoms with unaltered milk by changing pacing, nipple flow, and positioning, a thickening agent may be warranted. To verify the safety
and utility of the thickener, an instrumental exam
is advised.

264 CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF SWALLOWING DISORDERS
Flexible endoscopic swallowing studies (FEES)
are conducted with a small camera that is passed
through the nose while the child is observed drinking and eating. This can be performed by an SLP
independently or in a collaborative multidisciplinary clinic. The latter is preferred so a laryngologist can evaluate potential anatomical anomalies
interfering with breathing, talking, or swallowing.
An advantage of FEES is the ability to visualize soft
tissue and vocal fold mobility. It is the preferred
means of assessing dysphagia in a breastfeeding
62
infant.
FEES does not pose exposure to radiation
like a fluoroscopic swallowing study. It allows for
longer exams as tolerated by the child. The utility
of a longer exam is trialing multiple textures, postures, learned techniques, and stamina throughout
a meal.
Videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (VFSS)
are performed by an SLP and a radiologist. The view
follows material from the lips to the stomach. Advantages of a VFSS include visualization of the oral and
esophageal phases. Additionally, when a child aspirates during a swallow, it is poorly appreciated on
a FEES. Some children may ultimately tolerate VFSS
better than FEES for developmental, intellectual, and
sensory issues. Some cases are complex and may
require both FEES and VFSS for diagnosis.
Infants with sucking dysfunction do not readily
undergo instrumental exams to quantify their oral
phase. Though there is vast subjectivity, the gold
standard is a digital suck exam where a clinician
places a gloved finger in the baby’s mouth to feel for
suck vacuum and organization. There is emerging
technology quantifying sucking parameters to determine oral-motor competence.
63,64
Ultrasound provides a view of the tongue base as it approximates
a breast or bottle nipple. This instrumental examination is typically performed in an academic setting to
answer questions of the lingual/nipple juncture as
it relates to milk removal. Interpretation of the data
can be challenging to extrapolate functional correlations. Until a widely adopted quantification of
nonnutritive and nutritive suckling is implemented,
measures used to manage cases are indirect.
ISDDI can be found by scanning the accompanying
QR code.
Thickening agents (GelMix) can be found by scan-
ning the accompanying QR code.
INTELLECTUAL DEVELOPMENT
When patients participate in and understand their
care, they will ultimately have better outcomes. Even
newborns have ways of engaging that communicate
if they are tolerating oral nutrition while their caregiver mediates and executes strategies. As children
become verbal, they may be able to describe their
experience swallowing in a manner their parents
cannot from observation. Promoting their involvement builds trust and improves engagement as treatment plans are formed. If a child has an intellectual
delay or disorder, seek connection through concepts
that are tangible and motivating. This may be biofeedback during an endoscopic swallowing assessment or reviewing videos of healthful swallowing
patterns. If the problem is associated with feeding
impulsivity posing choking risk, creative support
using a meal coach, smaller utensils, and pacing
techniques may be helpful.
Family Support
When children have dysphagia, the family will be
a cornerstone of support. Tempering recommendations to their dynamic will enable compliance. It
can be overwhelming for a parent to integrate family meal disruptions as they accommodate a child’s
dysphagia. Conversely, swallowing strategies may
be embarrassing or overwhelming to a child. Each
family unit will have their own circumstances and
preferences for how to support their child’s needs.
If there are multiple coexisting medical conditions,
prescribing a litany of exercises and intricate swallowing strategies may not be reasonable. Consolidate tasks whenever possible. During evaluations, it
is valuable to gauge caregiver and parental support
as recommendations are made to improve feeding
and swallowing. Extended support systems not present for the evaluation may be a resource to further
expand therapeutic options. Multiple individuals

11. PEDIATRIC DYSPHAGIA: ASSESSMENT OF DISORDERS OF SWALLOWING AND FEEDING 265
could ultimately help a child to thrive by delivering
home interventions as they are prescribed. Whenever possible, involve these key players during treatment to replicate exercises and meal strategies.
SUMMARY
Caring for children with feeding and swallowing
disorders is a clinical specialty. Pediatric conditions are unique from adult situations as they may
be a congenital structural anomaly, neurological,
developmental, or behavioral. The underpinning of
dysphagia can be an early sign of a more widespread disorder or syndrome that is not yet diagnosed. Depending on the child’s age and cognitive
status, clinicians will interact heavily with parents
and caregivers. Integrating children into the care
plans will ultimately enhance their motivation. Create therapy goals collaboratively that include realistic goals, have distinct rationale, and are inherently
motivating. For medically complex children, they
will have numerous providers. Often, care delivery
for children, especially those who are critically ill, is
provided in a multidisciplinary model. Aim to avoid
redundancies in prescribed exercise regimens as
they may have numerous care plans implemented
at home. Maintaining fluid conversation among clinicians improves outcomes and can be intellectually
stimulating as elements of a child’s care will inevitably cross over into other specialty domains. Bear in
mind the potential for serial instrumental exams and
use them sparingly in younger children who may
become sensitized or fearful of objective studies.
Observation of feeding and swallowing behavior,
medical history, and family reports are key elements
to diagnostic interactions and developing effective
care plans.
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
1. Describe the interactive nature of a feeding
and swallowing disorder for an infant with
pathological gastroesophageal reflux.
2. What mealtime preferences and behaviors
can arise in individuals with autism spectrum
disorder?
3. Name clinical specialty team members that
would care for an extremely preterm infant
approaching 32 weeks’ postmenstrual age
who is ready to initiate oral feeding trials.
STUDY QUESTIONS
1. Traits that improve the likelihood of safe oral
nutrition include
A. Volitional cough
B. Independent implementation of swallowing
strategies
C. Head and trunk control
D. All of the above
2. How can you support children with tracheos-
tomy and chronic mechanical ventilation to
eat and drink by mouth?
A. It is unsafe to offer oral intake
B. Teach airway clearance techniques
C. Apply a speaking valve to provide upper
airway sensation and pressures
D. b and c
3. What feeding features may complicate oral
nutrition in a child who has bilateral vocal
fold paralysis from intubation trauma?
A. Ineffective airway clearance
B. Incomplete glottic protection while
swallowing
C. Pharyngeal residuals due to reduced
pressure
D. All of the above
4. A child with Down syndrome exhibits poor
weight gain on a diet of regular solids and
thin liquids. What might you expect to find
during an assessment?
A. Meal fatigue resulting from hypotonia
B. Gastroesophageal reflux disease
C. Tongue tie
D. Vocal cord paralysis

266 CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF SWALLOWING DISORDERS
5. How would you support a parent who wants
to breastfeed their infant who has a cleft lip
and cleft palate?
A. It is contraindicated to breastfeed a baby
with cleft palate and lip
B. Wait until the cleft is surgically repaired
C. Propose using an obturator
D. Determine milk transfer volume, efficiency,
and overall weight gain patterns
REFERENCES
1. Keles MN, Ertoy Karagol HI, Serel Arslan S, et al. Oropha-
ryngeal dysphagia in children with eosinophilic esophagitis. Dysphagia. 2023;38(1):474–482. doi:10.1007/
s00455-022-10489-3
2. Ingleby HR, Bonilha HS, Steele CM. A tutorial on diag-
nostic benefit and radiation risk in videofluoroscopic
swallowing studies. Dysphagia. 2023;38(2):517–542.
doi:10.1007/s00455-021-10335-y
3. Im HW, Kim SY, Oh BM, Han TR, Seo HG. Radiation
dose during videofluoroscopic swallowing studies and
associated factors in pediatric patients. Dysphagia.
2020;35(1):84–89. doi:10.1007/s00455-019-10006-z
4. Dipasquale V, Morello R, Romano C. Gastrointestinal and
nutritional care in pediatric neuromuscular disorders.
World J Clin Pediatr. 2023;12(4):197–204. doi:10.5409/
wjcp.v12.i4.197
5. Acar G, Ejraei N, Turkdog˘an D, Enver N, Öztürk G, Aktas¸
G. The effects of neurodevelopmental therapy on feeding and swallowing activities in children with cerebral
palsy. Dysphagia. 2022;37(4):800–811. doi:10.1007/s004
55-021-10329-w
6. Marpole R, Blackmore AM, Gibson N, Cooper MS,
Langdon K, Wilson AC. Evaluation and management of
respiratory illness in children with cerebral palsy. Front
Pediatr. 2020;8:333. doi:10.3389/fped.2020.00333
7. Skolnick GB, Keller MR, Baughman EJ, et al. Tim-
ing of cleft palate repair in patients with and without
Robin sequence. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(3):931–935.
doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000007311
8. Frederick R, Hogan AC, Seabolt N, Stocks RMS. An ideal
multidisciplinary cleft lip and cleft palate care team. Oral
Dis. 2022;28(5):1412–1417. doi:10.1111/odi.14213
9. Baxter D, Shanks AL. Pierre Robin syndrome. In: Stat-
Pearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Accessed September
2, 2023. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK5 6
2213/
10. Borjas Mendoza PA, Mendez MD. Beckwith-Wiedemann
syndrome. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
Accessed September 2, 2023. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.
gov/ books/NBK558993/
11. Ge LL, Xing MY, Zhang HB, Li QF, Wang ZC. Role of
nerves in neurofibromatosis type 1-related nervous system tumors. Cell Oncol. 2022;45(6):1137–1153. doi:10
.1007/ s13402-022-00723-3
12. Friedman C, Sarantos G, Katz S, Geisler S. Understanding gastroesophageal reflux disease in children. JAAPA
Off J Am Acad Physician Assist. 2021;34(2):12–18.
doi:10.1097/01.JAA.0000731488.99461.39
13. Vandenplas Y, Salvatore S, Devreker T, Hauser B. Gastrooesophageal reflux disease: oesophageal impedance versus pH monitoring. Acta Paediatr Oslo Nor 1992. 2007;
96(7):956–962. doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007 .00306.x
14. Damrongmanee A, El-Chammas K, Fei L, Zang H, Santucci
N, Kaul A. Pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter motor dynamics during swallow in children. Neu-
rogastroenterol Motil. 2021;33(2):e13962. doi:10.1111/
nmo.13962
15. Njeh M, Helmick R, Alshaikh E, et al. The irritable
infant in the neonatal intensive care unit: risk factors
and biomarkers of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J
Pediatr. Published online September 28, 2023:113760.
doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113760
16. Poddar U. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in
children. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2019;39(1):7–12. doi:
10.1080/20469047.2018.1489649
17. D’Auria E, Salvatore S, Pozzi E, et al. Cow’s milk allergy:
immunomodulation by dietary intervention. Nutrients.
2019;11(6):1399. doi:10.3390/nu11061399
18. Ruffner MA, Juste L, Muir AB. Medical management of
eosinophilic esophagitis in pediatric patients. Pediatr
Clin North Am. 2021;68(6):1191–1204. doi:10.1016/j.pcl
.2021.07.014
19. S¸ahan AK, Öztürk N, Demir N, Karaduman AA, Serel
Arslan S. A comparative analysis of chewing function and
feeding behaviors in children with autism. Dysphagia.
2021;36(6):993–998. doi:10.1007/s00455-020-10228-6
20. Mohiuddin TA, Raol N, Tey CS, et al. Quantifying the
healthcare burden of pediatric feeding disorder after
congenital heart urgerys J Pediatr. 2023;261:113593.
doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113593
21. Sinha A, Geragotellis A, Singh GK, et al. Vocal cord palsy
as a sequela of paediatric cardiac surgery: a review. Car-
diol Young. 2021;31(12):1929–1937. doi:10.1017/S10479
51121001165
22. Percul C, Lerendegui L, Lobos P, Liberto D, Moldes J,
Urquizo MM. Association between subglottic stenosis
and endotracheal intubation in tracheostomized pediatric patients. Cirugia Pediatr Organo Of Soc Espanola
Cirugia Pediatr. 2023;36(3):110–115. doi:10.54847/cp
.2023.03.10
23. Malan R, Van Der Linde J, Kritzinger A, et al. Evolution
of swallowing and feeding abilities of neonates with
hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy during hospitalisation: a case series. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. Published
online November 29, 2022:1–10. doi:10.1080/17549507
.2022.2147217

11. PEDIATRIC DYSPHAGIA: ASSESSMENT OF DISORDERS OF SWALLOWING AND FEEDING 267
24. Bhattacharyya N. The prevalence of pediatric voice and
swallowing problems in the United States. Laryngoscope.
2015;125(3):746–750. doi:10.1002/lary.24931
25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Birth preva-
lence of cerebral palsy. Published June 3, 2020. Accessed
October 8, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/cp/fea
tures/birth-prevalence.html
26. Salari N, Darvishi N, Heydari M, Bokaee S, Darvishi F,
Mohammadi M. Global prevalence of cleft palate, cleft
lip and cleft palate and lip: A comprehensive systematic
review and meta-analysis. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac
Surg. 2022;123(2):110–120. doi:10.1016/j.jormas.2021 .05
.008
27. Zeidan J, Fombonne E, Scorah J, et al. Global prevalence
of autism: a systematic review update. Autism Res Off J Int
Soc Autism Res. 2022;15(5):778–790. doi:10.1002/aur.2696
28. Baraskewich J, von Ranson KM, McCrimmon A, McMorris
CA. Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: a scoping review. Autism Int J Res Pract.
2021;25(6):1505–1519. doi:10.1177/1362361321995631
29. Malhi P, Venkatesh L, Bharti B, Singhi P. Feeding problems
and nutrient intake in children with and without autism:
a comparative study. Indian J Pediatr. 2017;84(4):283–
288. doi:10.1007/s12098-016-2285-x
30. Mayes SD, Zickgraf H. Atypical eating behaviors in children and adolescents with autism, ADHD, other disorders, and typical development. Res Autism Spectr Disord.
2019;64:76–83. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2019.04.002
31. Rodrigues JVS, Poli MCF, Petrilli PH, Dornelles RCM,
Turcio KH, Theodoro LH. Food selectivity and neophobia in children with autism spectrum disorder and neurotypical development: a systematic review. Nutr Rev.
2023;81(8):1034–1050. doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuac112
32. Xiang X, Yang T, Chen J, et al. Association of feeding
patterns in infancy with later autism symptoms and neurodevelopment: a national multicentre survey. BMC Psy-
chiatry. 2023;23(1):174. doi:10.1186/s12888-023-04667-2
33. Saad M, Afsah O, Baz H, El-regal ME, Abou-Elsaad T.
Clinical and videofluoroscopic evaluation of feeding
and swallowing in infants with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;150:110900.
doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110900
34. Shih MC, Rappazzo C, Hudson C, Ongkasuwan J. Videofluoroscopic swallow studies and diagnostic outcomes
in otherwise healthy infants with dysphagia. Ann Otol
Rhinol Laryngol. 2022;131(8):892–896. doi:10.1177/ 00
034894211047786
35. Salandy S, Rai R, Gutierrez S, Ishak B, Tubbs RS. Neurological examination of the infant. Clin Anat. 2019; 32(6):
770–777. doi:10.1002/ca.23352
36. Rousseau PV, Matton F, Lecuyer R, Lahaye W. The Moro
reaction: more than a reflex, a ritualized behavior of nonverbal communication. Infant Behav Dev. 2017;46:169–
177. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2017.01.004
37. Nuuttila S, Eklund M, Joutsa J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy
of glabellar tap sign for Parkinson’s disease. J Neural
Transm Vienna Austria 1996. 2021;128(11):1655–1661.
doi:10.1007/s00702-021-02391-3
38. Arcilla CK, Vilella RC. Tonic neck reflex. In: StatPearls.
StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Accessed October 17, 2023.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559210/
39. Reuter S, Moser C, Baack M. Respiratory distress in the
newborn. Pediatr Rev. 2014;35(10):417–429.
40. Herbert A, Pearn J, Wilson S. Normal percentiles for
respiratory rate in children — reference ranges determined from an optical sensor. Children. 2020;7(10):160.
doi:10.3390/children7100160
41. Inoue K, Yoshioka M, Yagi N, Nagami S, Oku Y. Using
machine learning and a combination of respiratory flow,
laryngeal motion, and swallowing sounds to classify safe
and unsafe swallowing. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018;
65(11):2529–2541. doi:10.1109/TBME.2018.2807487
42. Mayerl CJ, Gould FDH, Adjerid K, Edmonds C, German
RZ. The pathway from anatomy and physiology to diagnosis: a developmental perspective on swallowing and
dysphagia. Dysphagia. 2023;38(1):33–41. doi:10.1007/
s00455-022-10449-x
43. Gündüz Ü, Öztürk S. The effect of skin-to-skin contact
on placental separation time and initiation of breastfeeding. Breastfeed Med. 2023;18(7):522–527. doi:10.1089/
bfm.2023.0083
44. Beker F, Hughes IP, Jacobs S, et al. Smell and taste of
milk during tube feeding of preterm infants: neurodevelopmental follow-up of the randomized TASTE trial,
study protocol. Trials. 2023;24(1):290. doi:10.1186/s130
63-023-07224-0
45. Gillman A, Winkler R, Taylor NF. Implementing the free
water protocol does not result in aspiration pneumonia
in carefully selected patients with dysphagia: a systematic review. Dysphagia. 2017;32(3):345–361. doi:10.1007/
s00455-016-9761-3
46. Cristóbal Cañadas D, Bonillo Perales A, Galera Martínez
R, Casado-Belmonte MDP, Parrón Carreño T. Effects of
kangaroo mother care in the NICU on the physiological
stress parameters of premature infants: a meta-analysis
of RCTs. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(1):583.
doi:10.3390/ijerph19010583
47. Kurt FY, Kucukoglu S, Ozdemir AA, Ozcan Z. The effect
of kangaroo care on maternal attachment in preterm
infants. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020;23(1):26–32. doi:10.4103/
njcp.njcp_143_18
48. Hack M, Estabrook, MM, Robertson SS. Development of
sucking rhythm in preterm infants. Early Hum Dev. 1985;
11(2):133–140. doi:10.1016/0378-3782(85)90100-8
49. Barlow SM. Central pattern generation involved in oral
and respiratory control for feeding in the term infant.
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;17(3):187–
193. doi:10.1097/MOO.0b013e32832b312a
50. Shaker CS. Cue-based feeding in the NICU: using the
infant’s communication as a guide. Neonatal Netw
NN. 2013;32(6):404–408. doi:10.1891/0730-0832.32.6
.404

268 CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF SWALLOWING DISORDERS
51. Thomas T, Goodman R, Jacob A, Grabher D. Implementation of cue-based feeding to improve preterm infant
feeding outcomes and promote parents’ involvement.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2021;50(3):328–339.
doi:10.1016/j.jogn.2021.02.002
52. Lucas A, Sherman J, Fewtrell M. Postdischarge nutrition
in preterm infants. NeoReviews. 2022;23(8):e541–e557.
doi:10.1542/neo.23-8-e541
53. World Health Organization. Preterm birth. Accessed
October 22, 2023. https://www.who.int/news-room/factsheets/detail/preterm-birth
54. Meek JY, Noble L, Section on breastfeeding. Policy
statement: Breastfeeding and the use of human milk.
Pediatrics. 2022;150(1):e2022057988. doi:10.1542/peds
.2022-057988
55. Soriano VX, Ciciulla D, Gell G, et al. Complementary and
allergenic food introduction in infants: an umbrella review.
Pediatrics. 2023;151(2):e2022058380. doi:10.1542/peds
.2022-058380
56. World Health Organization. Complementary feeding.
Accessed October 23, 2023. https://www.who.int/healthtopics/complementary-feeding
57. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vitamins &
minerals: infant and toddler nutrition. Published April
11, 2022. Accessed September 22, 2023. https://www
.cdc.gov/nutrition/infantandtoddlernutrition/vitaminsminerals/index.html
58. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. When, what,
and how to introduce solid foods. Published June 27,
2023. Accessed September 20, 2023. https://www .cdc
.gov/nutrition/infantandtoddlernutrition/foods-anddrinks/when-to-introduce-solid-foods.html
59. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vitamin D:
infant and toddler nutrition. Published July 22, 2021.
Accessed September 22, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/
nutrition/infantandtoddlernutrition/images/FB-banner
.jpg
60. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Iron: infant
and toddler nutrition. Published November 16, 2021.
Accessed September 22, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/
nutrition/infantandtoddlernutrition/images/FB-banner
.jpg
61. International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative.
Home. Accessed October 23, 2023. https://iddsi.org/
62. Schroeder Jr. JW. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of
swallowing in the breastfeeding infant. Laryngoscope.
2023; 133(10):2803–2807. doi:10.1002/lary.30565
63. Truong P, Walsh E, Scott VP, Coleman T, Tilvawala G,
Friend J. Non-nutritive suckling system for real-time
characterization of intraoral vacuum profile in full term
neonates. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2023;11:107–
115. doi:10.1109/JTEHM.2022.3231788
64. Troung P, Walsh E, Scott VP, Leff M, Chen A, Friend J.
Application of statistical analysis and machine learning
to identify infants’ abnormal suckling behavior. IEEE J
Transl Eng Health Med. 2024;12:435–447. doi: 10.1109/
JTEHM.2024.3390589

Treatment of Feeding and
Swallowing Disorders in
Infants and Children
CHAPTER OUTLINE
Introduction
Swallowing Phases
Collaborative Goal Setting
Partnering With Pediatricians
Multidisciplinary Feeding Teams
Utility of Liquid Thickeners
Aspiration Versus Sensory Etiologies
Swallowing Safety With Intellectual
Impairment
Growth Faltering
Nonoral Feeding
Case Illustrations Within Diagnoses
Support for Families
Summary
Discussion Questions
Study Questions
References
Chapter
12
269

270 CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF SWALLOWING DISORDERS
A Look at the Chapter
Caring for a child whose feeding and swallowing
are impaired is addressed by multifaceted
interventions. Some children began their
lives with feeding tubes due to prematurity or
medical complexity. Others acquire nutritional
barriers from illness, injury, neurodegeneration,
or neoplastic changes. This chapter provides
essential tenets of treatment targeting individual
phases of nourishment, including feeding, oral
preparation, pharyngeal function, and esophageal motility. Pediatric care is distinct from adult
care as they are reliant on family and caregivers
to participate in treatment. Depending on age,
intellect, and comorbidities, children can provide
the most informative perspective of their barriers
to eating and drinking. Even a preverbal child,
such as an infant struggling with oral nutrition,
communicates with actions and physiology;
disengagement, elevated respiratory rate,
bradycardia, and fatigue are signs of distress.
Understanding these age-appropriate signals
helps clinicians formulate therapy plans that are
effective, safe, and respect signs from the child
that they are ready. Not all nutritional concerns
are rooted in mechanical problems. Some children’s nervous systems are hypersensitive and
lead to maladaptive experiences while eating.
Instrumental swallowing evaluations are invaluable to understand etiologies, provide patient/
family education, and conduct interventions that
are effective.
INTRODUCTION
One of the earliest purposeful sensorimotor acts a
child performs is swallowing. In the womb, feeding and swallowing behaviors emerge during the
first trimester. It is subsequently refined for eventual
coordination with breathing after birth. Early-term
delivery intercepts benchmarks of the central processing generator that makes this transition seamless in most healthy term children. Postmenstrual
age and medical status will determine whether a
neonate can consume nutrition orally. Neonatal and
infant feeding interventions involve observation of
physiological stability, pacing at breast and with
bottles, milk flow modifications, and altering milk
viscosity using thickening agents. Establishing safe
intake requires verification with instrumental exams
and extensive caregiver training to execute the modifications independently at home. Older children
may be seasoned in dysphagia interventions from
congenital maladies. If their condition is acquired,
overall health prognosis will be relevant in the therapy that is conducted. In each situation, treatment
should be specific to the condition, targeting interventions that are expected to improve within a reasonable time frame. Working with children creates
opportunities to understand family dynamics and
support systems. Care coordination and treatment
execution will ultimately rest on these individuals;
therefore, rapport with the entire family and the
multidisciplinary medical team is critical.
SWALLOWING PHASES
Preswallowing or feeding is the act of bringing
food into the mouth. In infants, the act relies on
reflexes to latch onto a breast or bottle and then
begin reflexively swallowing. Once children near
6 months of age, they exhibit intentional feeding
by bringing foods to their mouth independently.
They may also grasp their liquid in a similar manner, ranging from tugging on the parent’s shirt for
latching to picking up a bottle or cup for drinking.
The motor and cognitive skills involved in these
processes are complex. Any complication that prohibits early oral reflexes for latch, hand-to-mouth
coordination, or intellectual limitation to conceptualize this process constitutes a feeding disorder.
Trunk stabilization, therapeutic utensils, and coordination of hand-to-mouth movement are targets of
feeding therapy. Whenever children exhibit potential for hand-to-mouth coordination, and they are
safe for oral intake, create an environment that promotes nutritional autonomy. Allowing children to be
messy and learn from self-administration promotes
healthy mealtime behaviors.
likelihood of oral aversion when a child willingly
initiates intake. Mealtime skills are acquired from
1,2
It also reduces the

12. TREATMENT OF FEEDING AND SWALLOWING DISORDERS IN INFANTS AND CHILDREN 271
observation. Shared mealtimes are key opportunities for children to witness self-feeding, pacing,
texture and taste variety. This is of particular importance for children with intellectual impairment and
autism spectrum who benefit from explicit, rather
than implicit, learning.
Supporting independence prefeeding
and feeding.
Figure 12–1 provides examples of some feeding
assistive devices.
The oral phase of swallowing is impacted by
muscles of the mouth, tongue, and palate, as indicated and discussed in Chapter 2. Anatomical differences, such as cleft lip and palate, impact oral skills.
Some infants can compensate for vacuum loss at
breast using strategic latching. Others may require
special bottles that do not rely on the child to create
and sustain negative pressure, as seen in Figure12–2.
Neuromuscular weakness or idiopathic oral-motor
dysfunction can benefit from similar adaptive bottles
to streamline feeding efficiency. Feeding is the primary job of infants and can monopolize their energy
if the process is too cumbersome. Common interventions involve finding an appropriate fit latching
and bottle-feeding, so intake is complete in less than
about 30 minutes. No standardized algorithm exists
for the breadth of feeding devices. Brands and labels
vary widely
3,4
; therefore, the onus is on clinicians
to remain familiar with new products entering the
market. Addressing oral fit intrinsically relates to the
pharyngeal swallow because vacuum affects flow.
As oral fit is optimized, the flow will increase. Each
variable should be tested to assure infants exhibit
stable oral mechanics while simultaneously assessing
the safety of flow. When an oral seal is achieved, it
may be helpful to downgrade flow rate so a child has
sufficient time to synchronize pharyngeal transit and
breathing. In premature infants, or those who exhibit
concerning aspiration patterns, their therapy target
may be enhancing organization during nonnutritive
suckling.
5–7
There are wide varieties of pacifiers on
the market to explore, each potentially eliciting a
different motor response. In older children with oral
weakness, they may be able to participate in rangeof-motion and strengthening tasks that optimize oral
containment and chewing. Using a sugar-free lollipop
or licks of a popsicle may be a starting point for a
child who primarily uses a feeding tube. For children
with chewing difficulty, gum or supervised intake of
a soft solid may be options. With the accessibility of
smartphones, videos of the exercises and swallowing
patterns can improve the accuracy of home practice.
Once material approaches the vallecula, pharyngeal swallowing begins. The tongue base retracts,
palate and larynx elevate, and pharyngeal constrictors sequentially propel material through a patient’s
upper esophageal sphincter. Abnormalities that can
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
