Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_4464_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
45 Мб
Скачать
212 CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF SWALLOWING DISORDERS
A Look at the Chapter
The aging population is projected to take up a significant caseload in swallowing clinics in the near future. This chapter describes the changes to swallowing-related functions in healthy aging. Current clinical guidelines for the management of swallowing problems associated with indi­viduals with dementia are presented. The ethics involved in managing nutrition in dysphagia are also addressed in this chapter. When a speech­language pathologist or other team member recommends a change in diet, especially to a nonoral diet, the patients and their family may not agree with the recommendations. Ethical dilemmas relating to diet changes are discussed especially in relation to patients with dementia or at end of life.

AGING PROCESS RELATED TO SWALLOWING

Presbyphagia is used to describe the continuous and degenerative changes in swallowing functions in healthy aging. When swallowing functions deteri­orate to a level that is not tolerated or compensated for by the older adult, dysphagia will then occur. Up to 84% of older adults may develop changes in swallowing functions that would be considered as “abnormal” in younger healthy adults.
2
Swallowing problems with advancing age are a major health problem in older adults as well as for hospitalized individuals and nursing home residents.
Studies estimated that 30% to 68% of nursing home residents have signs of swallowing disorders.
3–6
Physical Changes

INTRODUCTION

The world population is aging. It is projected by the United Nations that 1 in 6 people in the world will be 65 years of age or over by 2050. vidual may experience changes in cognitive status, physical health, emotional health, as well as changes in financial status, daily activities dependence, and home environment. This chapter focuses on changes that have significant impacts on swallowing and mealtime experiences. Readers are encouraged to refer to other references to gain a comprehensive understanding of the aging process to better pre­pare care plans for aging individuals.
It is important to remember that the assessment and management procedures described in earlier chapters are applicable to the aging population. This chapter highlights additional issues that clini­cians should consider when working with an aging patient. The ethical considerations at the end of the chapter are also relevant to patients at end of life, such as those with terminal illnesses.
1
An aging indi-
Cortical changes have been identified in older adults when compared with younger adults. Studies have found that older adults have different activation pat­terns (in terms of activation areas and levels of activi­ties) in the cortex, suggesting that more cognitive resources are needed to control voluntary movements and trigger involuntary reflexes during swallowing.
Always remember to ask older patients if they have more trouble swallowing when watching television or when talking with friends. Distrac­tions often lead to coughing, choking, or just “it went down the wrong way.”
7–9
Sarcopenia is defined as a syndrome character­ized by progressive and generalized loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength and/or physical perfor­mance.
10
A number of swallowing-related muscles have been found to reduce in size with age, such as jaw muscles and suprahyoid muscles and tongue
9. SWALLOWING IN THE AGING POPULATION 213
muscles.
11–13
Studies have found a decrease in jaw bite force, suprahyoid muscle strength during jaw opening, and maximum isometric lingual pressure with age.
14–17
Some studies have found that the pre­viously named muscle strength is better reserved in females than males.
16,18,19
A decline in muscle strength does not mean there must be swallowing problems.
The prevalence of chronic diseases is higher in older adults than in young adults, and older adults tend to have more than one chronic disease. Com­mon chronic diseases include diabetes, hyperten­sion, stroke, Parkinson disease, metabolic disorders, chronic pain, cardiovascular disease, reduced vision and hearing, depression, cancer, and dementia.
20
In order to control the chronic diseases, older adults are often prescribed a number of medications. Polyphar­macy is defined as regular use of at least five medica­tions. Polypharmacy is identified as one of the factors associated with increased risk of aspiration, dyspha­gia, and malnutrition.
21,22
Frailty occurs when there is significant reduced muscle strength and impaired physical function, which limits the older adult’s activi­ties of daily living and independence.
Cognitive Changes
Past studies investigating cognitive changes in adults found that memory and cognitive speed deteriorate with age. However, there are individual variations on how much and when such changes begin. Low education level and poor health are two common risk factors identified in past studies to be associ­ated with cognitive decline.
23
Oral Stage
A system review found that sensitivity to taste degrades with age, and the level of decline varies across taste modalities.
24
Dental issues, such as tooth loss and use of dentures, are common in the aging population and may have an impact on chewing and malnutrition.
25,26
Longer oral transit time, mastica­tion time, and more time needed to reach maximal lingual pressure have been reported in older adults when compared with younger adults.
15,27,28
There is also a trend in increasing amount and frequency of oral residue with age.
27,29
Pharyngeal Stage
Slower triggering of the swallowing reflex with age has been reported in a number of studies. Some studies have also found that a larger bolus is required to trigger the reflex in older adults than in younger adults.
33,34
A number of associated factors for reduced airway closure with aging have been reported, including a reduction in amplitude of hyolaryngeal elevation and excursion,
35,36
space between hyoid bone and the mandible, more inferior placement of the larynx.
38
Increased pharyngeal transit time, less powerful pharyngeal constriction, and larger time lag between maxi­mum pharyngeal constriction and swallow onset have been reported in aging adults, especially in
27,39,40
males.
With the above previously mentioned reduction in pharyngeal constriction amplitude, it is expected that there is also more residue identified in older adults than younger adults.
8,41
Together with the reported reduction in sensitivity of the pharyn­geal and laryngeal sinuses with age,
42–44
an increased risk of aspiration with aging. Finally, a reduction in duration and range of opening of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) has been reported in aging adults.
45,46
30–32
increased
37
and
there is

CHANGES IN SWALLOWING

The following changes in swallowing functions are identified from studies that included healthy aging adults in the community.
Note that the presence of aspiration does not mean there is dysphagia or aspiration pneumonia.
214 CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF SWALLOWING DISORDERS
Esophageal Stage
A less secured closure of the UES at rest in older adults than in younger adults has been reported. Lower amplitudes in peristaltic movement and reduced sensory perception of pressure and pain in the esophagus with aging have been reported. The study also found that there was an increased cross-sectional area and increased stiffness of the esophagus with age.
47,48
49–51

NUTRITION IN THE AGING POPULATION

In the aging population, nutrition and eating play an important part of life, whether to maintain physical and mental health or to aid in recovery from dis­ease or sickness. intakes for older adults approximates 2500 kcal and 2100 kcal for males and females, respectively. European Society for Swallowing Disorders and the European Union Geriatric Medicine Society released a joint position document on dysphagia in older adults.
54
The guidelines recommended the daily energy intake for older adults should be around 27 to 30 kcal/kg of body weight. Protein is one of the key nutrients for older adults. Inadequate pro­tein intake has been shown to relate to muscle loss, sarcopenia, and other chronic diseases. The Food and Nutrition Board of the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine recommended 10% to 35% of daily energy intake should come from protein, and experts have recommended that the protein intake for older adults should be 1.2 to
2.0g/kg/day or higher. especially those with frailty and dysphagia, may consume a smaller amount of food in each meal, careful planning of high-quality protein meals is important to prevent malnutrition.
Because of the importance of eating, no diet should be recommended simply on the basis of a diagnosis or on the basis of an instrumental test. This is especially true in older adults, including those restricted to nursing home care or those indi­viduals with other comorbidities. In both groups, the diet should be as liberal as swallowing safety
52
The recommended daily energy
53
The
55
Given that older adults,
allows. The dysphagic older adult may face many problems affecting nutrition, such as poor eyesight, eating alone, and limited hand mobility. All of these problems have a bearing not only on what the patient may or may not eat but also on the patient’s quality of life. The importance of qualified dietitians overseeing the content of meals for older adults should not be overlooked in the rehabilitation pro­cess. However, the dietitian should not undertake the management of nutrition in older adults as their responsibility solely.
Multidisciplinary management is crucial in managing nutritional needs in older adults. The SLP must work together with the dietitian, the physical therapist, the pharmacist, and the attending physician to make sure that nutritional needs are met within the framework of the medical conditions present, the physical abilities and limitations of the patient, and the quality of life that apply to each particular patient.
In some patients, a more liberalized diet can enhance quality of life; in others, restrictions in cer­tain food groups or viscosities may be necessary.

DEMENTIA

Dementia is an increasingly prevalent condition globally, especially in the aging population. nutrition and dehydration are common concerns for individuals with different stages of dementia. Stud­ies have reported up to 93% of patients with demen­tia may have some level of swallowing difficulties. The prevalence of dysphagia and types of swallow­ing difficulties (sensory, motor, behavioral) vary for different types and stages of dementia. The causes may include an inability to recognize food; loss of appetite; difficulties in coordinating head, hands, and arms movements; and in cases of advanced dementia, difficulty with swallowing. Common observable signs of swallowing difficulties include pocketing of food in the mouth for extended period,
57
Mal-
56
54
9. SWALLOWING IN THE AGING POPULATION 215
choking and coughing while eating, and needing reminders to swallow. Regular clinical swallow­ing evaluation, with instrumental evaluation when appropriate, should be arranged to closely monitor the progress of dementia on swallowing functions. A swallowing and mealtime management plan need to be regularly updated and communicated with all members of the multidisciplinary team.
Individuals with dementia are often on a modi­fied diet and/or require feeding assistance to ensure swallow safety. Studies have found that the nutri­tional and moisture levels of modified texture food varied greatly with different methods of prepara­tion, and this may have a significant impact on the nutrition and hydration levels of the patients.
Speech-language pathologists should work closely with dietitians and caregivers to ensure that patients with dementia have adequate nutrition and hydration. This includes calorie counts and proper mix of protein, fats, and carbohydrates.
51,58,59
Studies have found that providing training to caregivers who are responsible for providing feed­ing assistance to dysphagic patients may help to improve the patients’ amount of food intake and reduce feeding difficulties.
60–62
There is moderate evidence in support of using nutritional supple­ments to improve the nutritional status of patients with dementia.
63,64
Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia
Behavioral and psychological symptoms of demen­tia (BPSD) refer to neuropsychiatric disturbances that are commonly seen in individuals with demen­tia and have significant impact on their daily liv­ing, prognosis, and management of dementia. BPSD are clinically classified into five domains: cognitive/ perceptual, motor, verbal, emotional, and vegeta-
65
tive.
Examples include delusions, pacing, physical
aggression, yelling, repetitive speech, depression,
anxiety, and disturbances in sleep and appetite. It is common for these symptoms to occur more fre­quently in late afternoons and evenings, known as “sundowning.” BPSD will affect the patients’ meal­time experience and swallowing functions, and like­wise, the nutritional status and mealtime experience may also contribute to BPSD. It is important that the SLPs are aware of the symptoms experienced by the patients and take these into consideration when making swallowing management and meal­time plans.
The patient with dementia is often monitored for wandering away, leaving lights on, or leaving fires burning. It is equally important to make sure the patient with dementia is getting enough to eat. In advanced stages, this usually does not happen without a caregiver.
Environmental modifications can be used to improve the mealtime experience and reduce BPSD. Limited evidence is available, and most studies are small-scale studies.
66
However, a positive impact is
generally found for the following recommendations:
n Play relaxing music during mealtimes. n Increase light intensity in the dining area. n Increase visual contrast in table settings,
including placemats, plates, and glasses.
n Provide more food choices during mealtimes. n Create family-style meals (serving in bulk and
passing the dish around instead of having individually served meals).
n Create a social environment (eat with
others) and encourage conversations during mealtimes.
Tube Feeding
A Cochrane systematic review on the use of tube feeding in older adults with advanced dementia concluded that there is not enough strong evidence to support the use of tube feeding in this popula-
67
tion.
Only 7 observational controlled studies were
216 CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF SWALLOWING DISORDERS
identified in the literature, and they found that tube feeding neither prolonged life nor improved nutri­tional status, when compared with assisted feeding. Recently, a large-scale retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare the effect of nasogastric tube feeding (NGF) and careful hand feeding (CHF) outcomes in hospitalized patients with advanced dementia.
68
The study found that there was no dif­ference in survival for patients in the 2 groups, and patients who were on NGF were associated with higher pneumonia risk.
The American Geriatrics Society and The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) from the United Kingdom issued state­ments and recommendations in relation to the use of feeding tubes for individuals with advanced
TABLE 9–1. Steps to Comfort Feeding
1. Interview family members, patient, and/or surrogate decision-maker
• Review if an Advanced Directive or Advanced Care Plan is in place.
• What is the patient’s preference? What does the family think the patient would want?
dementia.
69,70
Both papers do not recommend the use of feeding tubes for older adults with advanced dementia and that careful hand-feeding should be offered instead. It was highlighted that mealtime should be a time for socialization and not a task that needs to be completed as soon as possible. This is a very important attitude that should be educated to all caregivers of patients with dementia. This is espe­cially important to the managers of nursing homes and policymakers when assigning or planning resources for mealtime assistance. The statement recommends institutions should promote informed decision-making on feeding options using deci­sion aids for this population.
71–73
Table 9–1 shows the suggested steps for recommending comfort feeding.
2. Pros and cons of oral and tube feeding
3. Reach a decision • Give enough time for the family to make a
4. Documentation • Different countries and institutions may have
5. Implementation • Family and caregivers should be trained on
• Explain the evidence, potential benefits, and associated risks for oral feeding and tube feeding.
decision.
• Clinicians should remain as unbiased as possible and avoid casting guilty feelings to family, no matter what decision is made.
different legal requirements on how to document medical decisions.
• Usually the document is signed off by more than one clinician and physician. It may not be necessary for the family to sign this document.
careful hand-feeding strategies.
• All members of the care team (eg, nurses, physicians, speech-language pathologists) should be aware of the feeding arrangement.
• Maintain good oral hygiene.
• Create a comforting, distraction-free environment for mealtimes.
9. SWALLOWING IN THE AGING POPULATION 217
A decision aid for tube feeding published by NICE can be downloaded from their website.
SLPs need to carefully balance the benefits and risks of diet modifications and enteral feeding and fully involve the patients and surrogate decision-maker in the decision-making process.
Comfort feeding or careful hand-feeding refers to a series of feeding assistance and swallowing strate­gies, such as frequent reminders to swallow, multiple swallows, encouraging gentle coughs after each swal­low, teaspoon feeding, and thickened liquids. The patient should be seated upright during feeding. The caregivers should be trained to identify signs of swal­lowing distress and should pay full attention to the patient during feeding. A least restrictive diet should be recommended as far as possible to allow patients to enjoy their favorite dishes and drinks, which helps to increase their appetite and quality of life.
Support pillows for the back, neck, or head may be necessary to keep the patient in a position that maximizes their swallow and the ability to cough after the swallow.

FEEDING ASSISTANCE

All older adults should be encouraged to feed them­selves as long as possible to facilitate mealtime engagement and enjoyment, independence, and dignity. However, it is not uncommon that feeding assistance is needed for those who are frail, have a disability, have dementia, or have severe dysphagia. Studies have found that feeding assistance can help to improve the nutritional and hydration status in older adults.
At the initial stage or for milder cases, feeding assistance can be in the form of providing verbal prompts to encourage swallowing, self-feeding, or
61,74,75
pacing of swallows. When more assistance is needed, caregivers may need to start hand-holding to initiate feeding or completely take over the feeding process. An important role of the SLP is to educate caregiv­ers in the skills of feeding assistance and arrange regular monitoring or review of the feeding skills. Table 9–2 shows some tips for feeding assistance.
Case Vignette
Ralph, a 66-year-old male, had a mild cerebro­vascular accident but then had an infection that required him to stay in the hospital for 4 more weeks. He went home with significant weight loss. His primary doctor was surprised since he was told that Ralph was given 3 meals a day and appeared to eat most of his food. Ralph told the doctor he did not like the food, so he offered much of it to one of the night cleaning people. He told his doctor that he would try to eat better. When Ralph returned to the doctor’s office 4 weeks later, he gained 5 pounds. The doctor asked how his wife’s cooking was. He said, “same as usual but I was able to drink two bottles of beer a day to help digest it!”
Table 9–3 summarizes the major points to con­sider when preparing diets for older adults. The SLP and dietitian must take all of these into consider­ation, along with the nutritional requirements of each individual. These considerations are important because it is not always possible to do the proper tests or complete tests in older adults. Thus, the choice of food consistencies and the viscosities and combinations of viscosities may be more subjective than objective. There is a need to talk to the fami­lies, if available, other caregivers such as nurses and attendants, and roommates or neighbors to get a feel for what the older patient’s needs are when the patient themself cannot or does not express those needs. In all older patients, no diet should be so restrictive that it discourages oral intake. The Acad­emy of Nutrition and Dietetics advocates a liberal policy when considering diets for older adults.
76
218 CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF SWALLOWING DISORDERS
TABLE 9–2. Clinical Tips for Feeding Assistance
Before mealtime • Prepare appropriate feeding utensils.
• Prepare appropriate foods and liquids according to speech-language pathologist’s suggestions.
Before feeding • Assist the patient to sit upright, head looking
forward (not tilted up), may need cushions or other supporting devices to maintain good head and sitting postures.
• Check the oral cavity for any residue and buildup of secretions.
• (If denture is needed) Check denture position.
• Greet and chat with the patient to make sure the patient is awake and alert. Let the patient know it is mealtime.
During feeding • Seating arrangement: sit at a similar height level as
the patient and not directly in front of the patient.
• Create a warm, comfortable, and distraction-free environment.
• Let the patient know what is included in the meal (especially if it is pureed).
• Ensure the patient swallows with the recommended posture (if available).
• Monitor pace and volume of feeding.
• Allow enough time for the patient to swallow each bolus before feeding the next one.
• Where possible, provide choices for the patient during mealtime. It could be simply asking if the client would like to drink some water first before eating.
After mealtime • Check the oral cavity for residues.
• Encourage the patient to remain seated for 30 to 45minutes after meals.
• Maintain oral hygiene.
The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics encour­ages health care professionals to carefully balance the benefits and risks associated with “therapeutic diets” (including modified diets). Older patients should be involved in the decision-making as far as possible to increase the desire to eat and quality of life.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Ethical dilemmas may occur when considering whether to recommend nonoral feeding or highly restrictive modified diets to older adults or to patients who are at the end-of-life stage. SLPs may have identified high aspiration risks or inadequate nutritional and hydration intakes, warranting a med-
9. SWALLOWING IN THE AGING POPULATION 219
TABLE 9–3. Considerations When Planning a Nutritional
Rehabilitation Program for the Older Adult Patient
Body Structures and Functions
Swallow safety
Dentition
Physical disabilities and limitations
Cognitive functions
Motivation and appetite
Communication ability
Emotional functions
Nutritional needs — weight maintenance, weight gain, weight reduction
Activities and Participation
Social interactions at mealtime
Religious preferences
Ethnic food preferences
Environmental Factors
Living situation
Family or friends support
Available community diet services
Meal delivery systems
made repeated comments to the treatment team that she feels stressed and lost, wondering if this is how her mother wishes her life to end.
There is no straightforward recommendation that can be applied to all similar cases as the one presented. A number of clinical settings have pub­lished decision-making algorithms or guidelines to aid health care providers to make decisions on diet modifications or tube feeding.
77–80
A number of common themes to these guide­lines are as follows:
1. Accurately identify the current progress and
prognosis of the patient.
2. Educate the patient and family members of the
risks and benefits of the dysphagia manage­ment recommendations.
3. Involve the patient and family in the decision
making.
4. Encourage regular follow-up after a decision
has been made.
These guidelines can help to ease the burden on health care providers and the patient’s family.
ical need to modify the oral diet and/or the use of enteral feeding. However, the situation may become more complicated and ethically challenging when the patient has an advance directive or a living will, or when the patient or the surrogate decision- maker does not agree with the recommendations. The following case is a hypothetical situation that may be seen in rehabilitation hospitals:
Mrs P is a 69-year-old woman who had a severe stroke a month ago, resulting in severe global aphasia and dysphagia. She had a PEG tube placed a week ago. Mrs P’s swallowing func­tions are slightly and slowly improving over the last week. Mrs P’s daughter produced Mrs P’s advance directive (AD) to the physicians and demanded Mrs P’s feeding tube be removed, as Mrs P indicated in her AD that she does not want to live on tube feeding. Mrs P’s daughter
Biomedical Ethics Principles
Beauchamp and Childress proposed four ethi­cal principles that could be used to guide ethical decisions
n respect for autonomy n beneficence n nonmaleficence n justice
that each competent individual should have the right to decide how one is medically managed. Benefi­cence means clinicians should take positive action to do good for patients and act to prevent or remove harm. Nonmaleficence means that clinicians should not cause any deliberate harm to a patient. Finally, justice means patients’ needs should be addressed in a fair and equitable manner.
81
:
Respect for autonomy refers to the principle
220 CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF SWALLOWING DISORDERS

SUMMARY

This chapter presented how swallowing functions may change with age. Presbyphagia is a continuum of swallowing changes that occur in healthy aging. Clinicians should be aware that such changes may not lead to dysphagia.
And remember, older adults have their “likes and dislikes” just as everyone else. Learn what they are for each patient as they relate to food and drink, and pay attention to their experiences with foods and liquids that they do not like.
Special clinical guidelines have been developed for managing nutritional and hydration needs for individuals with dementia. Family members and patients should be involved in making an informed decision on how swallowing should be managed for this population. It is important to remember that eating (swallowing) is not just a means to obtain nutrition, but it is also an occasion for social interac­tion and enjoyment of life. Clinicians should adopt a least-restrictive diet and independent feeding as much as possible when working with older patients. Four biomedical ethics principles should guide all clinical decision-making: respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice.
A. Loss of muscle mass and strength B. Reduction in suprahyoid muscle strength C. Reduction in laryngeal elevation and
excursion
D. Reduced sensation in pharyngeal and
laryngeal sinuses
E. All of the above
2. Which of the following is not a feature of
careful hand-feeding?
A. Verbal prompts to swallow B. Talk while swallowing C. Gentle coughs after each swallow D. Teaspoon feeding E. Focus on one patient during the entire
mealtime
3. The meaning of respect for autonomy is
A. Clinicians should make clinical decisions
on behalf of the patients.
B. Clinicians should do no harm. C. Clinicians should act to the benefit of the
patients.
D. Clinicians should respect that patients
have the right to make decisions for their medical care.
E. All of the above

REFERENCES

DISCUSSION QUESTION

1. Discuss how clinical ethics can be applied to
the management of swallowing in older adults. Would you consider a prescription of nonoral feeding for an individual with advanced demen­tia as “an action to do good” or “a harmful act”?

STUDY QUESTIONS

1. Which of the following are changes that occur
in healthy aging?
1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Ageing 2019; Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/430); 2019.
2. Ekberg O, Feinberg MJ. Altered swallowing function in elderly patients without dysphagia: radiologic findings in 56 cases. Am J Roentgenol. 1991;156(6):1181–1184.
3. Maeda K, Akagi J. Sarcopenia is an independent risk factor of dysphagia in hospitalized older people. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016;16(4):515–521.
4. Nogueira D, Reis E. Swallowing disorders in nursing home residents: how can the problem be explained? Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:221–227.
5. Steele MC, Greenwood C, Ens I, Robertson C, Seidman­Carlson R. Mealtime difficulties in a home for the aged: not just ysphagia. Dysphagia.12(1):43–50.
6. Park Y-H, Han H-R, Oh B-M, et al. Prevalence and asso­ciated factors of dysphagia in nursing home residents. Geriatr Nurs. 2013;34(3):212–217.
9. SWALLOWING IN THE AGING POPULATION 221
7. Windel AS, Mihai PG, Lotze M. Neural representation of swallowing is retained with age: a functional neuroimag­ing study validated by classical and Bayesian inference. Behav Brain Res. 2015;286:308–317.
8. Humbert IA, Fitzgerald ME, McLaren DG, et al. Neuro­physiology of swallowing: effects of age and bolus type. Neuroimage. 2009;44(3):982–991.
9. Onozuka M, Fujita M, Watanabe K, et al. Age-related changes in brain regional activity during chewing: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Dent Res. 2003;82(8):657–660.
10. Dionyssiotis Y. Sarcopenia in the elderly. Eur Endocrinol. 2019;15(1):13–14.
11. Newton J, Yemm R, Abel R, Menhinick S. Changes in human jaw muscles with age and dental state. Gerodon- tology. 1993;10(1):16–22.
12. Feng X, Todd T, Lintzenich CR, et al. Aging-related genio­hyoid muscle atrophy is related to aspiration status in healthy older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013; 68(7):853–860.
13. Sonies BC, Baum BJ, Shawker TH. Tongue motion in elderly adults: initial in situ observations. J Gerontol. 1984; 39(3):279–283.
14. Oh D-H, Park J-S, Jo Y-M, Chang M. Differences in maxi­mal isometric tongue strength and endurance of healthy young vs. older adults. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(3): 854–
856.
15. Vanderwegen J, Guns C, Van Nuffelen G, Elen R, De Bodt M. The influence of age, sex, bulb position, visual feedback, and the order of testing on maximum anterior and posterior tongue strength and endurance in healthy Belgian adults. Dysphagia. 2013;28(2):159–166.
16. Palinkas M, Nassar MSP, Cecílio FA, et al. Age and gender influence on maximal bite force and masticatory muscles thickness. Arch Oral Biol. 2010;55(10):797–802.
17. Iida T, Tohara H, Wada S, Nakane A, Sanpei R, Ueda K. Aging decreases the strength of suprahyoid muscles involved in swallowing movements. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2013; 231(3):223–228.
18. Jeong D-M, Shin Y-J, Lee N-R, et al. Maximal strength and endurance scores of the tongue, lip, and cheek in healthy, normal Koreans. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;43(4):221.
19. Machida N, Tohara H, Hara K, et al. Effects of aging and sarcopenia on tongue pressure and jaw‐opening force. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017;17(2):295–301.
20. Schäfer I, von Leitner EC, Schön G, et al. Multimorbidity patterns in the elderly: a new approach of disease clus­tering identifies complex interrelations between chronic conditions. PLoS One. 2010;5(12):e15941.
21. Pu D, Wong MCH, Yiu EML, Chan KMK. Profiles of poly­pharmacy in older adults and medication associations with signs of aspiration. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2021; 14(5):643–649.
22. Matsumoto A, Yoshimura Y, Nagano F, et al. Polyphar­macy and its association with dysphagia and malnutri-
tion among stroke patients with sarcopenia. Nutrients. 2022; 14(20):4251.
23. Christensen H. What cognitive changes can be expected with normal ageing? Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2001;35(6): 768–775.
24. Methven L, Allen VJ, Withers CA, Gosney MA. Ageing and taste. Proc Nutr Soc. 2012;71(4):556–565.
25. Sheiham A, Steele J. Does the condition of the mouth and teeth affect the ability to eat certain foods, nutrient and dietary intake and nutritional status amongst older people? Public Health Nutr. 2001;4(03):797–803.
26. Sahyoun NR, Lin C-L, Krall E. Nutritional status of the older adult is associated with dentition status. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103(1):61–66.
27. Yoshikawa M, Yoshida M, Nagasaki T, et al. Aspects of swal­lowing in healthy dentate elderly persons older than 80 years. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60(4):506–509.
28. Fujii W, Kondo I, Baba M, et al. Examination of chew swallow in healthy elderly persons: does the position of the leading edge of the bolus in the pharynx change with increasing age? Jpn J Compr Rehabil Sci. 2011;2:48–53.
29. Ono T, Kumakura I, Arimoto M, et al. Influence of bite force and tongue pressure on oro‐pharyngeal residue in the elderly. Gerodontology. 2007;24(3):143–150.
30. Martin R, Barr A, MacIntosh B, et al. Cerebral cortical processing of swallowing in older adults. Exp Brain Res. 2007;176(1):12–22.
31. Wang CM, Chen JY, Chuang CC, Tseng WC, Wong AM, Pei YC. Aging‐related changes in swallowing, and in the coordination of swallowing and respiration determined by novel non‐invasive measurement techniques. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015;15(6):736–744.
32. Yokoyama M, Mitomi N, Tetsuka K, Tayama N, Niimi S. Role of laryngeal movement and effect of aging on swal­lowing pressure in the pharynx and upper esophageal sphincter. Laryngoscope. 2000;110(3):434–439.
33. Shaker R, Ren J, Bardan E, et al. Pharyngoglottal clo­sure reflex: characterization in healthy young, elderly and dysphagic patients with predeglutitive aspiration. Gerontology. 2003;49(1):12–20.
34. Ren J, Xie P, Lang IM, Bardan E, Sui Z, Shaker R. Dete­rioration of the pharyngo‐UES contractile reflex in the elderly. Laryngoscope. 2000;110(9):1563–1566.
35. Kim Y, McCullough GH. Maximum hyoid displacement in normal swallowing. Dysphagia. 2008;23(3):274–279.
36. Leonard R, Kendall KA, McKenzie S. Structural displace­ments affecting pharyngeal constriction in nondysphagic elderly and nonelderly adults. Dysphagia. 2004;19(2): 133–141.
37. Feng X, Todd T, Hu Y, et al. Age‐related changes of hyoid bone position in healthy older adults with aspiration. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(6):E231–E236.
38. Logemann JA, Pauloski BR, Rademaker AW, Colangelo LA, Kahrilas PJ, Smith CH. Temporal and biomechanical characteristics of oropharyngeal swallow in younger and older men. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000;43(5):1264–1274.