Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Экзамен зачет учебный год 2023 / Степанов Д.И. Дедлоки в непубличных корпорациях. Возможные варианты развития законодательства и судебной практики, 2015

.pdf
Скачиваний:
26
Добавлен:
21.12.2022
Размер:
1.27 Mб
Скачать

Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk, 47 Econometrica, 263 (1979).

Kaplow L., Shavell S. Property Rules versus Liability Rules: An Economics Analysis, 109 Harv. L. Rev. 713 (1996).

Karapetov A.G. Forced Exclusion of a Shareholder from a Company: Choosing a Regulatory Model [Isklyuchenie aktsionera ili uchastnika iz obschestva: vybiraya model' regulirovania]. Available at: http://m- logos.ru/img/Tezis_Karapetov_Iskluchenie_uchastnikov_16032015.pdf (Accessed 15 May 2015).

Karapetov A.G. Models of Protection of Civil Rights [Modeli zaschity grazhdanskokh prav: ekonomicheskii vzglyad]. The Herald of Economical Justice of the Russian Federation [Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudia RF]. 2014. No. 11. P. 24 - 81.

Katz M. Trivial Games as Predictors of a Mixed-Motive Game, 18 J. Conflict Res. 700 (1974).

Kholshev N. Instruments of Breaking Deadlocks between Shareholders under English Law [Mekhanizmy razreshenia tupikovykh situatsiy mezhdu aktsionerami po angliiskomu pravu]. Merges and Acquisitions Agency [Agentstvo "Sliania i pogloschenia"]. 2014. No. 8. P. 56 - 57.

Kim S.M. The Provisional Director Remedy for Corporate Deadlock: A Proposed Model Statute, 60 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 111 (2003).

Kittsteiner T., Ockenfels A., Trhal N. Partnership Dissolution Mechanisms in the Laboratory, 117 Econ. Letters 394 (2012).

Klein W.A. The Modern Business Organization: Bargaining Under Constraints, 91 Yale L.J. 1521 (1982).

Kline C.L. Protecting Minority Shareholders in Close Corporations: Modeling Czech Investor Protections on German and United States Law, 23 B.C. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 229 (2000).

Koh P. The Shareholder's Personal Claim: Allowing Recovery for Reflective Loses, 23 Sing. Ac. L. J. 863 (2011).

Korobkin R. The Endowment Effect and Legal Analysis, 97 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1228 (2003).

Kuznetsov A.A. Forced Exclusion of a Member from a Limited Liability Company [Isklyuchenie uchastnika iz obschestva s ogranichennoi otvetstvennostiu]. Moscow, Statut, 2014. 141 p.

Kuznetsova L.V. Forced Exclusion of a Member from a Limited Liability Company: Practice of Application of the Current Legislation [Isklyuchenie uchastnika iz obschestva s ogranichennoi otvetstvennostiu: praktika primemeniya deystvuyuschego zakonodatelstva]. Moscow, Yustitsinform, 2008. 220 p.

Kuznetsova L.V. Forced Exclusion of a Member from a Limited Liability Company [Isklyuchenie uchastnika iz obschestva s ogranichennoi otvetstvennostiu]. The Herald of the Supreme Arbitrazh Court of the Russian Federation [Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii]. 2006. No. 9. P. 4 - 19.

Landeo C.M., Spier K.E. Irreconcilable Differences: Judicial Resolution of

Business Deadlock, 81 U. Chi. L. Rev. 203 (2014).

Landeo C.M., Spier K.E. Shotgun Mechanisms for Common-value Partnerships: The Unassigned-offeror Problem, 121 Econ. Letters 390 (2013).

Landeo C.M., Spier K.E. Shotguns and Deadlocks, 31 Yale J. Reg. 143 (2014).

Laprade F.M. Rights and Obligations of Shareholders. National Regimes and Proposed Instruments at EU Level for Improving Legal Efficiency, (2012), available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/juri/dv/pe462463 _/pe462463_en.pdf [03.05.2015].

Levmore S. Self-Assessed Valuation Systems for Tort and Other Law, 68 Va. L. Rev. 771 (1982).

Lew C.J. The Custodian Remedy for Deadlocks in Close Corporations, 13 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 498 (1980).

Loewenstein G., Issacharoff S. Source Dependence in the Valuation of Objects, 7 J. Behav. Dec. Making 157 (1994).

Mahler P.A. Shareholder Wars: Internal Disputes In Close Corporations Do Not Always Lead to Judicial Dissolution, 76 N.Y. St. B.A. J. 28 (2004).

Maskin M. On the Rationale for Penalty Default Rules, 33 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 557 (2006).

Matheson J.H., Maler R.K. A Simple Statutory Solution to Minority Oppression in the Closely Held Business, 91 Minn. L. Rev. 657 (2007).

McAfee R.P. Amicable Divorce: Dissolving a Partnership with Simple Mechanisms, 56 J. Econ. Theory, 266 (1992).

McDonald D.K. Comment, Deadlock and Dissolution in the Close Corporation: Has the Sacred Cow Been Butchered?, 58 Neb. L. Rev. 791 (1979).

Means B. A Voice-Based Framework for Evaluating Claims of Minority Shareholder Oppression in the Close Corporation, 97 Geo. L.J. 1207 (2009).

Merton R.C. On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates, 29 J. Fin. 449 (1974).

Miller S.K. Minority Shareholder Oppression in the Private Company in the European Community: A.

Mitchell C. Shareholders' Claims for Reflective Loss, 120 L. Q. Rev. 457 (2004).

Molitor M.K. Eat Your Vegetables (Or at Least Understand Why You Should): Can Better Warning and Education of Prospective Minority Owners Reduce Oppression in Closely Held Businesses, 14 Fordham J. Corp. & Fin. L. 491 (2009).

Moll D.K. Shareholder Oppression in Close Corporations: The Unanswered Question of Perspective, 53 Vand. L. Rev. 749 (2000).

Morrison G.C. WTP and WTA in Repeated Trial Experiments: Learning or Leading? 21 J. Econ. Psych. 57 (2000).

Mukwiri J. The No Reflective Loss Principle, 26 Company Law. 304 (2005). Murdock C.W. Evolution of Effective Remedies for Minority Shareholders

and Its Impact upon Valuation of Minority Shares, 65 Notre Dame L. Rev. 427

(1990).

Murphy C.E., Jr. Revision of the North Carolina Statute's Corporate Deadlock Provisions, 51 N.C. L. Rev. 815 (1973).

Nicholson B. The Fiduciary Duty of Close Corporation Shareholders: A Call for Legislation, 30 Am. Bus. L.J. 513 (1992).

O'Connell D.H. Dissolution As a Remedy for Dissension and Deadlock in the New York Closely-Held Corporation, 19 Buff. L. Rev. 585 (1970).

O'Neal F.H. Oppression of Minority Shareholders: Protecting Minority Rights, 35 Clev. St. L. Rev. 121 (1987).

O'Neal F.H. Oppugnancy and Oppression in Close Corporations: Remedies in America and in Britain, 1 B.C. Indus. & Com. L. Rev. 1 (1959).

O'Neal F.H. Resolving Disputes in Closely Held Corporations: IntraInstitutional Arbitration, 67 Harv. L. Rev. 786 (1954).

O'Neal F.H. Restrictions on Transfer of Stock in Closely Held Corporations: Planning and Drafting, 65 Harv. L. Rev. 773 (1952).

O'Neal F.H., Thompson R.B. Close Corporations and LLCs: Law and Practice, (Rev. 3d ed.), available online at westlaw.com (last visited April 22, 2015).

Pachman S.L. Corporations Evenly Divided: Judicial Remedies For Equal Shareholders, 24 Seton Hall L. Rev. 234 (1993).

Polinsky A.M. Resolving Nuisance Disputes: The Simple Economics of Injunctive and Damage Remedies, 32 Stan. L. Rev. 1075 (1980).

Posner E. There Are No Penalty Default Rules in Contract Law, 33 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 563 (2006).

Rachlinski J.J., Jourden F. Remedies and the Psychology of Ownership, 51 Vand. L. Rev. 1541 (1998).

Rapoport A., Chammah A.M. The Game of Chicken, 10 Am. Behav. Scientist, 10 (1966).

Ribstein L.E. Close Corporation Remedies and the Evolution of the Closely Held Firm, 33 W. New Eng. L. Rev. 531 (2011).

Thompson R.B. Shareholders as Grown-Ups: Voting, Selling, and Limits on the Board's Power to "Just Say No", 67 U. Cin. L. Rev. 999 (1999).

Rock E.B., Wachter M.L. Waiting for the Omelet to Set: Match-Specific Assets and Minority Oppression in Close Corporations, 24 J. Corp. L. 913 (1999).

Rosenbaum D.E. Comment, The Provisional Director Statute, 31 Mo. L. Rev. 536 (1966).

Rostovskiy A. Ways of Unlocking Solving According to Shareholders' Agreement [Sposoby razreshenia tupikovoi situatsii v ramkakh aktsionernogo soglashenia]. Corporate Lawyer [Korporativnyi yurist]. 2010. No. 10. P. 44 - 47.

Rubinstein A. Strong Perfect Equilibrium in Supergames, 9 Int. J. Game Theory, 1 (1980).

Saliterman R.A. Dissolution and Buy-out Provisions as Potential Solutions for Close Corporation Dissension, 1974 Utah L. Rev. 38 (1974).

Samuelson P.A. Evaluation of Real National Income, 2 Oxford Econ. Papers 1 (1950).

Schaefer E.J. The Fallacy of Weighting Asset Value and Earnings Value in the Appraisal of Corporate Stock, 55 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1031 (1982).

Schiessl M. The Liability of Corporations and Shareholders for the Capitalization and Obligations of Subsidiaries under German Law, 7 Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 480 (1986).

Shapira G. Shareholder Personal Action in Respect of a Loss Suffered by the Company: The Problem of Overlapping Claims and Reflective Loss in English Company Law, 37 Int'l Law. 137 (2003).

Shapiro L.L. Involuntary Dissolution of Close Corporations for Mistreatment of Minority Shareholders, 60 Wash. U. L. Q. 1119 (1983).

Shishido Z. The Fair Value of Minority Stock in Closely Held Corporations, 62 Fordham L. Rev. 65 (1993).

Shogren J.F., Cho S., Koo C., List J., Park C., Polo P., Wilhelmi R. Auction Mechanisms and the Measurement of WTP and WTA, 23 Resource & Energy Econ. 97 (2001).

Shogren J.F., Hayes D.J. Resolving Differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: Reply, 87 Am. Econ. Rev. 241 (1997).

Shogren J.F., Shin S.Y., Hayes D.J., Kliebenstein J.B. Resolving Differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept, 84 Am. Econ. Rev. 255 (1994).

Steinhaus H. The Problem of Fair Division, 16 Econometrica, 101 (1948). Stepanov D.I. Interests of Legal Entity and Interests of Corporation's

Shareholders [Interesy yuridicheskogo litsa i ego uchastnikov]. The Herald of Economical Justice of the Russian Federation [Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudia RF]. 2015. No. 1. P. 56 - 61.

Stepanov D.I. New Provisions of the Civil Code on Legal Entities [Novye polozhenia Grazhdanskogo kodeksa o yuridicheskikh litsakh]. Statute [Zakon]. 2014. N 7. P. 31 - 56.

Stepanov D.I. Could a Shareholder be Liable to another Shareholder: a Problem to Discuss [Otvetstvennost aktsionera pered aktsionerom: vozmozhna li postanovka takoi problemy]. Corporate Lawyer [Korporativnyi yurist]. 2008. No. 11. P. 8 - 23.

Stepanov D.I. Succession in Case of Spin-Off [Pravopreemstvo pri reorganizatsii v forme vydelenia]. The Herald of the Supreme Arbitrazh Court of the Russian Federation [Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii]. 2002. No. 8. P. 94 - 107.

Stepanov D.I. Freedom of Contract and Corporate Law [Svoboda dogovora i korporativnoe pravo], in: Civil Law in Modern Times: Collection of Articles in Memory of M.I. Braginskiy [Grazhdanskoe pravo i sovremennost: sbornik statey, posvyaschyonnykh pamyati M.I. Braginskogo], ed. by V.N. Litovkin, K.B. Yaroschenko. Moscow, Statut, 2013. P. 314 - 398.

Stepanov D.I. Corporate Control Phenomenon [Fenomen korporativnogo kontrolya]. The Herald of the Civil Law [Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava]. 2009. Vol. 9. No. 3. P. 142 - 206.

Sterling M.J. The Theory and Policy of Shareholder Actions in Tort, 50 Modern L. Rev. 468 (1987).

Strahilevitz M.A., Loewenstein G. The Effect of Ownership History on the Valuation of Objects, 25 J. Consumer Research, 276 (1998).

Stromquist W. How to Cut a Cake Fairly, 87 Amer. Math. Monthly 640 (1980).

Suet Lin J.S. Barring Recovery for Diminution in Value of Shares on the Reflective Loss Principle, 66 Cambridge L. J. 537 (2007).

Sukhanov E.A. American Corporations in Russian Law: on New Edition of Chapter 4 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation [Amerikanskie korporatsii v rossiiskom prave: o novoi redaktsii gl. 4 GK RF]. The Herald of the Civil Law [Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava]. 2014. Vol. 14. No. 5. P. 3 - 32.

Thaler R.H. Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice, 1 J. Econ. Behavior & Org. 39 (1980).

Thompson R.B. Corporate Dissolution and Shareholders' Reasonable Expectations, 66 Wash. U. L. Q. 193 (1988).

Thompson R.B. The Law's Limit on Contracts in a Corporation, 15 J. Corp. L. 377 (1990).

Thompson R.B. The Shareholder's Cause of Action for Oppression, 48 Bus. Law. 699 (1993).

Tuzov N.A. Grounds for Forced Exclusion from a Limited Liability Company [Osnovania isklyuchenia uchastnika iz obschestva s ogranichennoi otvetstvennostiu]. Law and Economy [Zakonodatelstvo i ekonomika]. 2004. No. 8. P. 36 - 43.

Uryuzhnikova A.V. Problems of Legal Regulation of the Withdrawal from a Limited Liability Company: PhD Thesis in Law [Problemy pravovogo regulirovania vybytiya uchastnika iz obschestva s ogranichennoi otvetstvennostiu: dissertatsia na soiskanie uchyonoi stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk]. Rostov- na-Donu, 2009. 29 p.

Vickrey W. Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders, 16 J. Fin. 8 (1961).

Соседние файлы в папке Экзамен зачет учебный год 2023