Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Posobie_Public_Law_the_last (1).doc
Скачиваний:
28
Добавлен:
15.03.2015
Размер:
441.86 Кб
Скачать

Grammar revision

  1. Translate these sentences into Russian. Pay attention to the underlined words.

  1. All States are equally free to do what they like provided they abide by certain rules of the game.

  2. It should not be thought that the mere fact of being included in the list proclaimed in the Declaration upgrades a standard of behavior to the rank and status of a universal and fundamental principle.

  3. It also is necessary for the standard to be laid down in a set of norms of general import.

  4. Of the various fundamental principles regulating international relations, this is unquestionably the only one on which there is unqualified agreement.

  5. This being so, what is its present purport?

  6. Consequently individuals cannot be brought to trial and punished by foreign states for any official act, if such happens to be contrary to international law.

  7. It follows that it is not for courts, but for the organs responsible for foreign affairs, to take matters relating to foreign acts into their hands and use diplomatic channels to discuss, or argue over, them with the foreign state concerned.

  8. Yet another rule enjoins states to refrain from instigating, organizing, or officially supporting the organization on their territory of activities prejudicial to foreign countries.

  9. Another customary rule stipulates that whenever a civil war breaks out in a foreign country, states are duty-bound to refrain from assisting insurgents, unless they qualify for the status of national liberation movements.

  10. Arguably, economic force is proscribed when used as a means of compelling a state to adopt a course of action contrary to its will and advantageous to the coercive state.

  11. That this principle was proclaimed and strongly emphasized in 1945 is hardly surprising.

  12. The UN Charter obliges member states to settle their international disputes peacefully so as generally to prevent peace and security, as well as justice, being imperiled.

  13. Consequently, the principle is breached whenever a state willfully and mali fide refuses to resort to negotiations or other peaceful means or procedures proposed by the counter-party, or after the failure of a particular means or procedure, agreed upon by the contending parties refuses to continue to seek a settlement, or takes action that is likely to aggravate the dispute or jeopardize peace.

Speaking.

Answer the questions.

p. 1-3

    1. What serves as basic guidelines for the life of the whole community?

    2. How did a body of law evolve?

    3. What three postulates did states act upon?

    4. What does the “laissez-faire approach” imply?

    5. What were the principles by which all the members were to abide in 1945?

    6. How did the situation change in the 1960s?

    7. Are international relations smooth in the present world community?

    8. Which fundamental principle is unquestionably the only one on which there is unqualified agreement?

    9. What sweeping powers and rights does sovereignty include?

    10. What does legal equality imply?

    11. May a state exercise its sovereign power over actions legally performed by foreign states on its territory?

    12. Which acts may a state not carry out?

p. 3-5

    1. In which customary rules has the principle of non-intervention in the internal or external affair of other states been concretely enshrined? Are these rules still in force?

    2. What questions arise concerning new forms of intervention?

    3. Under what circumstances is the principle of peaceful settlement of disputes breached?

    4. Why do States prefer to bring the issue of gross disregard for human nights before international organizations?

    5. In what areas does self-determination appear firmly entrenched in the corpus of international law?

    6. What does the right to external self- determination mean?

    7. What is the difference between external and internal self- determination?

    8. Are the principles of international law independent from each other? Why?

  1. Make up the plan of the text in the form of statements and develop it into a summary.

Phrases which might be used in presenting the summary: to start with, one should bear in mind; I’d like to draw your attention to; it’s worth mentioning; it’s suffice to stress; in addition; as I pointed out; in conclusion.

  1. Read the text “Immunities of diplomatic agents” and answer the questions.

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]