5. Тези доповiдей на конференціях:

Приходько Г. І. Когнітивно-прагматичний аналіз аргументативного тексту / Г. І. Приходько // Тези доповідей міжнародного форуму «Мовна освіта: шлях до євроінтеграції». – К. : Ленвіт, 2005. – С. 141–142.

6. Автореферат диссертацiï:

Тихомирова Е.В. Контроль владения диалогической формой устного официального общения (фр. яз., неязыковой вуз) : автореф. дис. на соискание науч. степени канд. пед. наук : спец. 13.00.02 «Методика преподавания» / Е. В. Тихомирова. – М., 1995. – 25 с.

Шмагринская Н.В. Тестирование в системе общего среднего образования : автореф. дис. на соискание уч. степени канд. пед. наук : спец. 13.00.08 «Теория и методика профессионального образования» / Н.В. Шмагринская. – Пятигорск, 2008. – 22 с.

7. Електронний ресурс (internet):

IELTS: International English Language Testing System : Режим доступу : http://www.ielts.org/

a curriculum Framework for Romani. – Strasbourg : Council of Europe, Language Policy Division, 2008. – 103 р. – Режим доступу : http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Conference_EN.asp#TopOfPage

8. Література іноземною мовою:

Bachman, L. F. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing / L. F. Bachman. – Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1991. – 407 p.

Brown, G. Teaching Talk: strategies for production and assessment / [Brown G., Anderson A., Shillcock R., Yule G.]. – London : Cambridge University Press, 1984. – 178 p.

Scott, R. Speaking / R. Scott // Communication in the Classroom. Applications and Methods for a Communicative Approach [edited by K. Johnson, K. Morrow]. – Longman, 1992. – P. 70–77.

Cheng, L. Description and Examination of National Matriculation English Test / L. Cheng, L. Qi // Language Assessment Quarterly. – 2006. – # 3(1). –Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. – P. 53–70.

University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations : Режим доступу : http://www.cambridgeesol.org/

9. Тексти для аналізу

Wharton, E. The Age of Innocence/ E. Wharton. – New York : Collier Books,

Macmillan Publishing Company, 1986. – 366 p.

Joe, R. Obama is Drawn into Debate He Hoped to Avoid. – The New York

Times. - May, 14, 2009. – P. 3.

Додаток г Найбільш уживані конструкції англійського наукового стилю (при захисті дипломної або курсової роботи)

The intent of this paper is to report on a study conducted …

We will particularly focus on a description of the nature …

We will discuss the theoretical basis for this investigation, our data, collection and analysis, our findings and implications of those findings.

The analysis of … involves two distinct procedures …

There were two distinct stages in the data collection process …

The data are being subjected to multiple levels of analysis.

… presents a persuasive argument for …

The data reported in this paper were drawn from a limited sampling.

In pilot data collection we observed …

The representative utterances … listed are merely suggestive of the variety of …what are some possible classroom applications of these considerations.

The findings suggest that …

We now have a basis to confirm …

Perhaps the analysis of … should be used as a stepping stone to the discussion of …

The finding has certain teaching applications …

Looking at the overall patterns of frequency …

The present paper is an attempt at analyzing the functioning of … in …

Before … we have to specify the nature of object of our research.

The concrete tasks of our research are as follows: a) the analysis of …; b) the comparative analysis of …;

In choosing the methods of our research we proceed from the assumption that …

Our examples have been taken from …

The total number of examples is …

The methods used in this research include: a) semantic and structural description; b) quantitative analysis; c) comparative analysis;

In this light the linguistic analysis of … is of great theoretical and practical interest.

Each style of the literary language has at its disposal and makes use of a group of language means. The interrelation of these means is peculiar to the given style.

What are the distinctive linguistic characteristics of …

Research into these questions is of …

It is characterized by definite communicative aim and its own definite system of language means.

As our examples have been taken from … we shall briefly mention here the main peculiarities of this type.

The bulk of the vocabulary used in … is neutral and common literary. But apart from this, … style has its specific vocabulary features and is characterized by an extensive use of …

The basic peculiarities lie in their syntactical structure.

The following grammatical peculiarities are of paramount importance.

There is no agreement on this point. Some linguists regard it as …

The main components if … representing …

The classification of … appears to be …

They can be classified according to the following criteria: 1) their syntactic structure; 2) the number of …; 3) the … character;

The problem under discussion has been analyzed at length by … who has studied the semantic nature of … and … / in whose analysis emphasis is laid on the form of these verbs in …

Our analysis has been carried out on the material of … The total number of the examples analyzed - …

In the first place our data tend to show that … is absolutely predominant.

In this paper we proceed from the classification put forward by … since it enables one without superfluous detalization to embrace the many-sided nature of this …

In accordance with this classification … are subdivided into …

Each of these … can in its turn be divided into a number of semantic groups and sub-groups. For example, to the … belong … The sub-group … contains the words denoting …

Scheme … represents the results of our research into … as compared with analogous …

The classification our analysis is based on is shown on Scheme I.

The comparison of the data given on Scheme II enables one to reveal an essential discrepancy in the quantitative and qualitative characteristics.

… have some features in common.

… of this type do not occur in our textual material.

These distinctions are to some extent dependent on the semantics of these verbs.

The results of our research enable us to draw some general conclusions.

The qualitative and quantitative characteristics of introductory verbs used in … may serve as one of the parameters which can be used in differentiating functional styles.

The smaller number of … and their different nature are indicative of … as compared with that of …

Problems of this kind are relevant not only for the adequate description of particular functional styles but also for the development of the general theory of styles.

Висловлювання для оформлення доповіді під час захисту

Початок доповіді

Mr (Mrs) Chairman/Chairperson, ladies and gentlemen.

The subject of our research / investigation is …

The problem to be discussed today is …

Our diploma paper deals with / is devoted to …

Our research is connected with / is based on …

Before taking up this problem I’d like to throw light on …

Кінець доповіді

That’s all as far as our research is concerned.

Thus we come to the following conclusion.

All that has been said points to …

It may be important to conclude …

To sum it up, …

Основна частина

It is necessary to note …

Now let’s touch upon …

Thus we see that…

It may be assumed that …

In order to go more thoroughly into …

As regards to …

It is essential for …

It should be mentioned here…

It is necessary to determine here…

Here is an illustrative example/explanation of …

It needs to be said that …

Let’s point out the main features of …

It is beyond doubt that …

Bearing in mind the main objective of our research…

There is no need to enumerate all …

On the basis of these considerations we may …

In this connection particular importance should be attached to …

Within such a context …

This example clearly shows …

It may be confirmed by indicating that …

The principles stated above fully correspond to …

All this provides a broad spectrum of …]

These observations are of great significance in …

We may proceed from the fact that …

It is the general idea that …

It proves that …

It follows that …

Apart from this …

To some extent …

Judging by (from) …

On the contrary …

What is more …

It is remarcable that …

Despite the fact that …

Despite the many attempts …

Controversial standpoints were expressed in connection with …

The opponents of this opinion defended their position by showing …

The most outstanding differences of opinion concern …

We support / we are in full agreement with the view of …

Відповіді на питання

As you see …

If I’m not mistaken …

If I remember correctly …

In reply to your first question …

To answer your question …

The answer may lie in …

ЗМІСТ

1. Загальна характеристика дипломної (курсової) роботи як навчально-наукового дослідження студентів………….. 3

2. ВИМОГИ ДО ЗМІСТУ дипломної (курсової) роботи……………6