Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Скачиваний:
45
Добавлен:
17.08.2013
Размер:
577.75 Кб
Скачать

480

SEQUENCE-SPECIFIC MANIPULATION OF DNA

 

 

 

 

 

 

SEQUENCE-SPECIFIC DNA CAPTURE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In the majority of cases, the motivation behind attempts to develop ways for sequence-

 

specific DNA cleavage is to provide access to particular

 

DNA sequences, as just de-

 

scribed above for RARE cleavage. A more direct approach would be to develop methods

 

for the specific capture of DNA sequences of particular interest. There are a number of

 

different approaches that have been used to purify DNAs based on sequence rather than

 

size. Biological methods we have already described include PCR or differential cloning.

 

These are extremely effective, but because the steps are

usually carried out in solution

 

and involve a number of enzymes, the targets of such purifications are usually limited in

 

size. Large insert cloning systems have been described, but these are not yet applicable to

 

differential cloning. For example, YAC cloning can be used

to immortalize a set

of large

 

DNA fragments, but then this set has to be screened to identify the clone containing a

 

particular sequence of interest. Such screening can be quite time-consuming. Instead of

 

screening, we are concerned here with methods that

 

select the target of interest.

Purification techniques are a natural way to select molecules with desired properties such

 

as specific DNA sequences.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In principle, a DNA sequence could be selected by cloning, by PCR, by binding to a

 

specific protein, by binding to the complementary strand to

form a duplex, or by binding

 

to a third strand to form a triplex. In each of these approaches the desire is a simple se-

quence-specific purification method. In this section we will limit our attention to physical

 

purifications based solely on DNA base interactions. Such

methods have been called in

 

the past, perhaps somewhat inelegantly, DNA fishing. Differential PCR and cloning meth-

 

ods will be described later in the chapter. The advantage of the pure, physical methods is

 

that if successful, they are very easy to implement and easy

to scale up to large

numbers

 

of samples or large quantities. A key obstacle in the use of

such methods

is that

once the

 

DNA target is captured by a probe, there either must be an

efficient way to release it, or

 

one has to have an efficient way of working directly with

the immobilized DNA (as in

 

solid state DNA sequencing, described earlier in Chapter 9).

 

 

 

 

TRIPLEX-MEDIATED DNA CAPTURE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The major advantage in using a third strand to capture a

DNA duplex is that there is no

 

need to melt the duplex. This avoids potential damage arising from any preexisting

nicks

 

in the DNA strands. It also helps avoid many of the complications caused by the extensive

 

interspersed repeats in the DNA of higher organisms. There are a number of potential ap-

 

plications for triplex capture of DNA. For example, triplex formation could be used, in

 

principle, to isolate from a library all those clones that contained specific homopurine-ho-

 

mopyrimidine sequences such as (AG)

 

n , (AAG)

n , or (AAAG)

n . These clones are all poten-

tially useful genetic probes, since all are VNTRs. Such clones have been isolated in the

past by screening libraries by hybridization

with the repeated seqeunce. However,

if one

 

is

interested in a large set of such clones,

each one detected by hybridization

has to

be

picked by hand for future use. It would be far simpler to isolate the entire set of VNTRcontaining clones in a single physical purification step. A survey of simple repeated sequence motifs in the GenBank database several years ago is shown in Table 14.1. This indicates that a significant fraction of all simple sequence VNTRs known to date could be amenable to triplex-mediated capture because they involve homopurine repeats.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TRIPLEX-MEDIATED

DNA

CAPTURE

 

481

TABLE 14.1

Repeating Single Sequence Motifs in the Genbank Database

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1991)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dinucleotide

 

AG

 

24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AT

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AC

86

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TG

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trinucleotide

AAC

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CCG

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AGG

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AAT

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AGC

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AAG

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ATC

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ACC

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tetranucleotide

 

AAAG

 

20

 

AGCC 1

 

AACT

1

 

 

 

 

 

AAAT

22

AGAT

9

ACAT

1

 

 

 

 

ACAG

3

ATAG

3

ACGC

1

 

 

 

 

ACAT

2

AGCG

1

ACTG

2

 

 

 

 

AAGG

 

8

ATCC

8

 

AGGG 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AAGG

 

13

AATC

4

AGCT 1

Lohger

 

AAAAG

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AAAAAAAAAG

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TTTTTG

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: Adapted from results summarized by Lincoln McBride.

Note: Underlined sequences are triplex selectable.

Two other potential

applications for triplex capture concern the purification of a spe-

cific DNA sequence. If a genomic fragment contains a known specific homopurine se-

quence,

one should be

able to capture this sequence away from the entire genome by

triplex formation on a solid support. Alternatively, such a sequence could be introduced

into a desired section of a genome to allow subsequent capture of DNA from this region.

Such approaches, once they have matured, could potentially expedite the analysis of se-

lected

megabase regions

of DNA considerably. The second potential use of triplex cap-

ture would be to separate clones from host cells. Here the triplex forming sequence would

be built into the vector used for cloning. After cell lysis, triplex capture would be used to retain the cloned DNA and discard the DNA of the host. This has many appealing features. Once host DNA is gone, direct analysis of cloned DNA is possible without the need for radiolabeled DNA probes or specific PCR primers. Host DNA leads to considerable background problems when low-copy number vectors like YACs are used. The sensitivity

of hybridization or PCR analyses would be increased considerably if host DNA could be

removed in advance.

 

 

 

 

A number

of

different ways to use triplexes to purify DNA have

been

explored.

Although

much

more

development work needs to be done, the preliminary findings

are

very promising. In our work, magnetic microbeads were used as the solid support. The

power of this general approach was described earlier in applications for solid state DNA

sequencing. Magnetic microbeads are available commercially that are coated with strep-

tavidin.

Streptavidin

will bind specifically to virtually any biotinylated

macromolecule.

Any desired small

DNA

sequence can be prepared with a 5

 

-biotin by the use of biotin

482

SEQUENCE-SPECIFIC MANIPULATION OF DNA

 

 

phosphoramidite in ordinary automated oligonucleotide

synthesis. Longer 5

 

-biotinylated

probes can be made by PCR using 5

-biotinylated primers. Alternatively, internally bi-

otinylated

DNA sequences can be made by PCR

using biotinylated base analogs as

 

dpppN substrates. Some of these compounds are incorporated quite efficiently by DNA

 

 

polymerases. Once attached to the streptavidin microbeads, biotinylated DNA probes are

 

still quite accessible for hybridization or for triplex formation. A schematic illustration of

 

the way microbeads have been used to develop a simple triplex capture method of DNA

 

 

purification is shown in Figure 14.13. The key

point is that a permanent magnet can be

 

used to hold the beads in place while supernatant is removed and exchanged. This allows

 

very rapid and efficient exchanges of reagents. At pH 5 or 6 any duplex DNA captured by

 

the complementary sequence on a bead will remain attached. At pH 8 the captured DNA

 

 

will be readily released and removed with the supernatant.

 

 

Three different experiments have been used to

test the ease and efficiency of

triplex

 

DNA capture with magnetic microbeads. In the first,

an artificial mixture was made of

 

two plasmids. One contained just a vector with no known forming capability, which in-

 

cluded a lacZ gene. When this plasmid is transformed into

E. coli,

blue colonies are pro-

duced on the appropriate indicator plates, which contain a substrate for the beta-galactosi-

 

dase product of this gene that yields a blue-colored product. The second plasmid, initially

 

Figure 14.13 Use of streptavidin-coated magnetic microbeads for affinity purification of triplex

DNA. Adapted from Ito et al. (1992).

n -containing DNA
2 or other polyva-
n , the result is a pu-
n , cloned into the lacZ

 

 

 

 

 

TRIPLEX-MEDIATED DNA

CAPTURE

present at much lower concentrations, contained an insert of (AG)

 

 

 

 

gene in such a way as to disrupt its translation. This results in white colonies after trans-

 

formation

of

E. coli.

Thus the ratio of plasmids in a mixture can be determined just by

comparing the number of colonies of each color after transformation (making the reason-

 

able assumption that the transformation efficiencies of the two almost identical plasmids

 

are the same). When a mixture of the two types of DNA was subjected to a single cycle of

 

purification via triplexes formed with magnetic beads containing (TC)

 

 

 

 

rification

of the

(AG)

n -containing plasmid by a factor

of 140,000 fold with an overall

yield

of

80%,

as shown in Table 14.2. Such a purification

is sufficient

 

for almost

any

need. However, if

necessary the purity could surely be increased much

further by a sec-

 

ond cycle with the magnetic beads. The entire process took only a few hours. Recently

 

Lloyd Smith and coworkers have demonstrated that a similar process can be carried out in

 

only 15 minutes. G- and T-containing sequences can also be used in an analogous way to

 

capture homopurine-homopyrimidine sequences in the presence of Mg

 

 

 

 

lent cations (Takabatake et al., 1992).

 

 

 

 

A second test of triplex-mediated capture with magnetic

microbeads

is

shown

 

schematically in Figure 14.14. Here the challenge was to purify (AG)

 

 

 

clones away from the remainder of a chromosome 21-specific library. The original bacte-

 

riophage

library

was first subcloned into a plasmid vector. Magnetic purification pro-

 

ceeded as described in Figure 14.13. Then the purified DNA was

used to transform

 

coli.

Individual colonies were picked and screened for the presence of (AG)

 

 

n

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

tween

each of the

vector arms and the internal (AG)

 

n

sequence. A

positive signal should

be seen for each

(AG)

n -containing clone with one of the two vector

arms depending on

the orientation of the insert (Fig. 14.15). Some of the actual results obtained are shown in

Figure 14.16. The effectiveness of the procedure is quite clear. Overall, 17 of the first 18

colonies tested showed vector-insert PCR signals, and each of these was different, imply-

 

ing that different genomic (AG)

n -containing clones had been selected.

 

483

E.

by PCR be-

TABLE 14.2

Triplex-Mediated Purification of Target

 

 

Plasmids from a Reconstituted Library

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of Colonies (%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

White (pTC45)

Blue (pUC19)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Before Enrichment

 

 

 

 

5.0 104

1.1 107

 

 

(0.5)

 

(99.5)

 

 

 

After Enrichment

 

 

 

 

4.0 104

0.5

102

 

 

(99.9)

 

(0.1)

 

 

 

 

 

Source:

Adapted from Ito et al. (1992).

 

 

Note: Plasmids prepared from a reconstituted library were used for

 

 

transformation

of

E. coli

with or without enrichment by triplex

affinity capture. pTC45 (target) and pUC19 give white and blue

colonies, respectively, on indicator plates. In this experiment the

 

 

enrichment was

 

1.8-fold10with5

a recovery of

80%.

Figure 14.14

Outlined of the procedure used to purify (AG)

n -containing clones from a chro-

mosome 21 library.

Figure 14.15 PCR scheme used, after triplex-mediated purification, to screen for clones that contain an (AG) n insert.

TRIPLEX-MEDIATED DNA CAPTURE

485

Figure 14.16 Results of the analysis of a number of triplex-purified clones by the PCR assay described in Figure 14.15. Adapted from Ito et al. (1992).

A third test of triplex capture took advantage of a strain of yeast that Peter Dervan and his co-workers had constructed, containing an insert of a 40-base homopurine-homopy-

rimidine

sequence

in

yeast

(S.

cerevisiae)

chromosome III. This strain was originally

made to test the efficiency of triplex-mediated DNA cleavage. We were able to obtain and

use the same strain to check the efficiency of triplex-mediated DNA capture. Instead of

working with yeast genomic DNA, which would suffer considerable shear damage under

the conditions used to manipulate the magnetic microbeads, we first subcloned this strain

of yeast into a plasmid vector. Then plasmid DNAs were selected using magnetic mi-

crobeads containing the appropriate homopyrimidine sequence. In practice, 50% of the

clones isolated contained the correct DNA insert as determined by DNA sequencing. The

other contaminating clones had a similar, but not identical, sequence that was a natural

component

of the

yeast

genome. Presumably

this

contaminant could

have been selected

486 SEQUENCE-SPECIFIC MANIPULATION OF DNA

against more efficiently by the use of slightly more stringent conditions for triplex formation and washing.

AFFINITY CAPTURE ELECTROPHORESIS

A major limitation with all of the magnetic microbead methods is that the shear damage generated by liquid phase handling of DNA in this way restricts targets to DNAs less than

a few hundred kb in size. To work with larger DNAs, it is necessary that most or all manipulations take place in an anticonvective medium like agarose. This encourages using electrophoresis in agarose to carry DNA past an immobilized triplex capture probe (Ito et

al., 1992). Such an approach has been termed affinity capture electrophoresis (ACE). To test this method, we used streptavidin-containing microbeads (no need for magnets here) embedded in agarose. A DNA sample containing a potential target for triplex formation

with the sequence on the beads was loaded in a sample well and electrophoresed at pH 5

past

the potential capture

zone, as shown in Figure 14.17. Then the pH was

raised to 8,

and any material captured was released and analyzed in a subsequent electrophoresis step.

 

This simple procedure

works, but at present, its efficiency

is

less

than

desired. The

poor

efficiency arises from

nonspecific binding between streptavidin

and

DNA

at pH

5.

Streptavidin is a protein with an isolectric point of about pH 7. Therefore at pH 5 the protein is positively charged and, as such, binds nonspecifically to DNA. To destabliize these electrostatic interactions, high ionic strength buffers can be used. Such buffers worked very well with the magnetic separations described earlier. However, they lead to serious complications in electrophoretic procedures because the high salt buffers have high conductivity, and as a result there is considerable heating and band broadening. These problems can probably be circumvented by changing the properties of the surface of streptavidin to introduce more negative charges. Since the three-dimensional structure of the protein is known (Chapter 3), the molecular design and engineering needed to accomplish this change in charge should be relatively straightforward.

Figure 14.17 Schematic illustration of a procedure for ACE: Affinity capture electrophoresis. The lightly shaded portion contains gel-embedded immobilized triplex-forming oligonucleotides corre-

sponding to the target of interest.

 

 

 

 

AFFINITY

CAPTURE ELECTROPHORESIS

487

To avoid the problems with the currently available form of triplex-mediated ACE, an

 

alternative capture scheme was developed that could be implemented at neutral pH. This

 

 

scheme lacks the attractive generality of triplex

capture because it is applicable only to

 

the ends of DNA fragments, and it requires that information be available about the DNA

 

 

sequence at

one end, or at least

that a clone

be available

that overlaps

the

ends

of the

 

DNA to be captured. This is a major limitation, in principle, but it is less confining in

 

practice. A major potential application for ACE is to try to purify specific large restriction

 

fragments from complex mixtures. If a linking library that

corresponds to

the

ends

of

 

these fragments is available, as described in Chapter 8, then the necessary clones or se-

 

quences will already be in hand.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The basic scheme of an alternative ACE procedure, termed end-capture electrophore-

 

sis, is shown in Figure 14.18. In this scheme, the ends of a long DNA duplex are treated

 

with an exonuclease like

E. coli

Exonuclease III, or DNA

polymerase

in the absence of

 

triphosphates, to remove a small portion of the 3

 

-ends of the duplex and expose the com-

 

plementary 5

sequence as single strand. The affinity capture medium is made, as before,

 

with the sequence complementary to the target. In this case the beads will contain the au-

 

thentic 3

-end of the large DNA fragment, synthesized from known sequence or isolated

 

as the appropriate half of a linking clone. Capture consists of ordinary duplex formation.

 

The challenge is to find an efficient and nondisruptive way to release the target after it has

 

been captured. An effective way to do this, illustrated in Figure 14.19, is to prepare the

 

capture probe so that it contains the base dU

instead of T. This still allows efficient,

 

sequence-specific strand capture. However, subsequent treatment with Uracil DNA gly-

 

 

cosidase, an enzyme that participates in the repair of DNA (Chapter 1), will release the

 

captured target. The same general idea was described in Chapter 4 as

a

method

for

 

minimizing PCR contamination.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 14.20 shows an actual example of end capture electrophoresis. Here, with DNA fragments of the order of 10 kb in size, the method works quite well. It still has not been successful in the capture of much larger targets. This may reflect the much slower rate at which these targets will find a probe during the electrophoresis. Because of excluded vol-

ume effects, the end of a large DNA will be accessible for hybridization only a small fraction of the time. If this is the problem, it should be resolvable in principle by using much slower electrophoresis rates.

Figure 14.18 Schematic procedure for end capture electrophoresis. The appropriate singlestranded probes needed will be easily obtained from half-linking clones (see Chapter 8).

Figure 14.19 An end capture electrophoresis scheme that allows easy release of the captured DNA.

Figure 14.20 Example of the successful implementation of the scheme shown in Figure 14.19. Adapted from Ito et al. (1992). Lane 2 (arrow) shows a band removed by capture. Lane 4 (arrow) shows elution of the captured band.

USE OF BACKBONE ANALOGUES IN SEQUENCE-SPECIFIC DNA MANIPULATION

 

489

USE OF BACKBONE ANALOGUES IN

 

 

 

 

 

 

SEQUENCE-SPECIFIC

DNA

MANIPULATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

A number of backbone analogues of DNA have been described in recent years. The prin-

 

 

ciple force motivating the

development of such compounds is their presumed usefulness

 

 

as DNA or RNA drugs. The

expectation is that some of these analgoues will be resistant

 

to intracellular enzymes that interfere with attempts to use natural RNA or DNA oligonu-

 

cleotides to modulate ordinary cellular processes. We will discuss some of these efforts at

 

the end of the chapter. One feature of a number of the backbone analogues that have been

 

made is replacement of the highly charged phosphodiesters by neutral groups. The sim-

 

plest approach is the use of phosphotriesters, in which the POO

 

group of the normal

 

backbone is replaced by POO-R. The advantage conferred by such a substitution is that,

 

in a duplex or triplex containing such an altered backbone, the natural electrostatic repul-

 

sion between the DNA strands will be minimized. Thus the resulting complexes ought to

 

be much more stable, and one might expect that the backbone analog would preferentially

 

 

form duplex or triplex at the expense of the normal strands present in a cell. This is why

 

such compounds are attractive as potential drugs. Normal triplexes with two homopurine

 

 

and one homopyrimidine strands, for example, are seriously destabilized at low-salt con-

 

centration because they have three intra-strand sets of electrostatic repulsion compared to

 

only one for the duplex and a separated third strand (Fig. 14.21).

 

 

 

Phosphotriesters have a feature that considerably complicates their use. Since each

 

phosphate now has four different substituents, as shown in Figure 14.22, it is optically ac-

 

tive. This means that each alkyl group R can occupy one of two positions on each phos-

 

phate. The resulting number of different stereoisomers for a chain with

 

n phosphates is 2

n .

This is a very discouraging prospect for in vivo or in vitro

studies, and phosphotriesters

 

are likely to see rather

limited use until

the

problem of

synthesizing

specific

isomers

 

can be solved. Until this

has been accomplished,

attention

has focused on

other

back-

 

bone analogues which

have the disadvantage of

being

less like

natural nucleic

acids

but

 

Figure

14.21

Electrostatic repulsion expected in various DNA structures.

(a)

Normal DNA du-

plex.

(b)

Normal

DNA triplex.

(c) DNA duplex with one strand displaced by

an uncharged DNA

 

analog.

 

(d) DNA

duplex with one

strand displaced and a triplex formed at the other strand by

bind-

 

ing of two uncharged DNA analogs.

Figure 14.22 Stereoisomeric pair of phosphotriesters.

Соседние файлы в папке genomics11-15