Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Genomics and Proteomics Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Metin Akay

.pdf
Скачиваний:
50
Добавлен:
10.08.2013
Размер:
9.65 Mб
Скачать

264 TUMOUR AND TUMOUR SUPPRESSOR PROTEINS

TABLE 10.2 Characteristic RRM Frequencies for Protein Groups and DNA Requlatory Sequences

Molecule Type

Frequency

No. Sequence

S/N

Error

 

 

 

 

 

DNA Regulatory Sequences

 

 

 

 

promoters

0.3437

53

128

0.016

operators

0.0781

8

44

0.008

SOS operators

0.4687

5

13

0.050

enhancers

0.4883

10

467

0.024

Protein Sequences

 

 

 

 

oncogenes

0.0313

46

468

0.004

kinases

0.4297

8

71

0.003

fibrinogens

0.4423

5

99

0.001

ACH receptors

0.4922

21

137

0.002

phages’ repressors

0.1054

4

51

0.005

bacterial repress.

0.0839

4

56

0.004

repressors

0.0990

25

198

0.008

heat shock proteins

0.0947

10

326

0.005

interferons

0.0820

18

117

0.008

hemoglobins

0.0234

187

119

0.008

signal proteins

0.1406

5

31

0.016

proteases’ inh.

0.3555

27

203

0.008

proteases

0.3770

80

511

0.004

trypsins, chym.tr

0.3447

18

257

0.004

chymotrypsin

0.2363

5

35

0.004

serine prot.

0.4609

41

504

0.004

restriction enzymes

0.2910

3

36

0.004

amylases

0.4121

12

170

0.002

neurotoxins

0.0703

16

60

0.004

growth factors

0.2929

105

200

0.016

ins.-like(IGF I,II)

0.4922

12

72

0.008

IGFBP (hum)

0.1602

6

172

0.001

FGFs

0.4512

7

121

0.005

NGFs

0.4040

8

192

0.008

glucagons

0.3203

13

71

0.034

homeo box proteins

0.0459

9

100

0.001

cytochromes B

0.0590

16

201

0.004

cytochromes C

0.4765

45

127

0.004

myoglobins

0.0820

49

128

0.004

lysozymes

0.3281

15

124

0.004

phospholipases

0.0430

29

115

0.004

actins

0.4800

12

163

0.002

myosins

0.3400

11

201

0.004

RNA polymerases

0.3350

10

256

0.001

protein A

0.0342

2

41

0.002

 

 

 

 

 

10.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

265

(IL-2), and viral and tumor suppressor proteins that can elucidate why melatonin and IL-2 might play a critical role as supplements in treatment of cancer diseases.

10.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

10.3.1. Interactions Between Viral and Tumor Suppressor Proteins

The human neurotropic polyoma virus (JCV), produces a regulatory protein T-antigen, which is a key component in the completion of the viral life cycle. T-antigen has the ability to transform neural cells in vitro and its expression has been detected in several human neural-origin tumors. The JC virus most likely infects humans through the upper respiratory tract and remains in most people throughout their lives and, in some cases, causes minor subclinical problems. However, in people whose immune systems are depressed, either through chemotherapy given to organ transplant recipients or an illness such as AIDS, JCV can become active and may contribute to cancer in the brain [2]. Experimental findings revealed that interactions of viral oncoprotein T-antigen with tumor suppressor proteins could lead to induction of cancer [1–4].

In this study 8 JC viral T-antigen protein sequences, 13 p53 protein sequences, and 9 pRb protein sequences were investigated concerning the understanding of the structure–function relationship within these proteins. A multiple cross-spectral analysis was performed for each selected protein group as well as for their mutual combination using the EIIP values (Figs. 10.3a to 10.3f ). As a result, characteristic frequencies of analyzed protein groups were obtained and are shown in Table 10.3. The RRM analysis was applied to a group of 8 T-antigen proteins, and the common feature in terms of characteristic frequency was identified at f ¼ 0.2061 + 0.125, S/N ¼ 129.58. This frequency component is common to all analyzed sequences and therefore can be considered as the consensus characteristic of their common biological activity for all protein sequences in this functional group.

The p53 tumor suppressor gene has proven to be one of the genes most often mutated in human cancers. It involves mainly point mutations leading to amino acid substitutions in the central region of the protein and thus causes its abnormal functions. Because p53 and pRb proteins are the key players in defending our body against cancer, it is of great importance to determine the characteristic frequencies of these proteins that correspond to their biological functionality. Thus, the RRM procedure was repeated with p53 and pRb tumor suppressor proteins and their cross-spectral functions obtained are shown in Figures 10.3b and 10.3c. The prominent characteristic frequencies of p53 and pRb tumor suppressor proteins were identified at f ¼ 0.4326 + 0.077, S/N ¼ 159.97 and at f ¼ 0.4316 + 0.111, S/N ¼ 164.28, respectively. As was mentioned above each specific biological function of the protein is characterized by a single frequency. The similarity of characteristic frequencies of p53 and pRb proteins (Table 10.3) is expected as both p53 and pRb proteins are tumor suppressors sharing the same biological function. Thus, the frequency f ¼ 0.4326 identified within the RRM analysis is

FIGURE 10.3. Multiple cross-spectral functions of protein groups: (a) JC viral T-antigen proteins, (b) p53 proteins, (c) pRb proteins, (d) JC viral T-antigen and p53 proteins, (e) JC viral T-antigen and pRb proteins, and ( f ) T-antigen, p53 and pRb proteins. The prominent peak(s) denote common frequency components. The abscissa represents RRM frequencies, and the ordinate is the normalised intensity. The prominent peaks were found for T-antigen at f1 ¼ 0.2061 and for p53 (pRb) proteins at f2 ¼ 0.4326.

10.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

267

FIGURE 10.3. Continued.

268 TUMOUR AND TUMOUR SUPPRESSOR PROTEINS

TABLE 10.3 Peak Frequency and Signal-to-Noise Ratio of Protein Groups

 

 

 

 

 

 

Standard Error,

Protein Group

Frequency

No. Sequence

S/N

1/No. Seq.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

T-antigen

0:2061

 

8

129.58

0.125

Agnoprotein

0.3047

 

9

62.12

0.111

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

p53

0:4326

 

13

159.97

0.077

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

pRb

0:4316

 

9

164.28

0.111

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

T-antigen, p53

0:2021

 

21

312.36

0.048

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

T-antigen, pRb

0:2041

 

17

167.12

0.059

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

T-antigen, p53, pRb

0:2021

 

30

506.28

0.033

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

T-antigen, Agnoprotein

0:2480

 

17

130.86

0.059

T-antigen, Agnoprotein, p53

0.3564

 

30

288.49

0.033

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

T-antigen, Agnoprotein, pRb

0:2402

 

26

157.63

0.038

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

T-antigen, Agnoprotein, p53, pRb

0:2021

 

39

290.27

0.026

Agnoprotein, p53

0.3564

 

22

292.34

0.045

Agnoprotein, pRb

0.3096

 

18

176.23

0.056

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

considered as a characteristic feature of the specific biological activity of p53 and pRb proteins—ability to stop the formation of tumors. After careful examining of the corresponding consensus spectrums of p53 and pRb proteins (Figs. 10.3b and 10.3c), we observe more than one less significant peak corresponding to other biological functions determined within the RRM analysis.

It is known that the human polyomavirus (JCV) also contains an open reading frame within the late region of the viral genome that encodes a 71-aminoacid protein, the agnoprotein. Following accumulating evidence in support of an association between JCV infection and human brain tumors, the expression of agnoprotein in a series of 20 well-characterized medulloblastomas was assessed [24]. Importantly, some medulloblastoma samples that expressed agnoprotein had no sign of T-antigen expression. The p53 protein was detected in only 6 of the 11 tumors in which agnoprotein was expressed. None of the 20 samples showed expression of the viral late capsid proteins, ruling out productive infection of the tumor cells with JCV. These data provide evidence that the JCV late gene encoding the auxiliary agnoprotein is expressed in tumor cells. The finding of agnoprotein expression in the absence of T-antigen expression suggests a potential role for agnoprotein in pathways involved in the development of JCV-associated medulloblastomas [24]. Despite all of this, the role of agnoprotein in the development of brain tumors is still unknown. Recent studies suggest, however, that the interaction of T-antigen with agnoprotein may affect T-antigen ability to control cell growth. The communication between these two viral proteins may impact the ability of the virus to induce brain tumors [24]. The researchers also found agnoprotein and T-antigen in about 50% of the samples, with some samples containing only agnoprotein. They postulated “the finding of agnoprotein expression in the absence of T-antigen expression suggests a potential role for agnoprotein in pathways that control the development of JCV-associated medulloblastomas [24].” Obviously further study is needed to prove that the virus plays a significant role in formation of medulloblastomas [24].

10.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

269

New findings in these studies can be used to develop therapeutic vaccines against T- antigen and agnoprotein. Such vaccines could conceivably prevent the JCV from inducing the formation of medulloblastomas.

Following the aim to explore the interactions between T-antigen and agnoprotein and the possibility of the influence of agnoprotein on the interactions between T-antigen and tumor suppressor proteins p53 and pRb, the RRM analysis was performed. Peak frequency and signal-to-noise values are calculated and shown in Table 10.3. Multiple cross-spectral functions of viral protein T-antigen, agnoprotein, and their mutual interactions with tumor suppressor proteins p53 and pRb are shown in Figures 10.4a to 10.4g.

10.3.2. Mutual Interactions between IL-2, Melatonin, Oncogene, and Viral and Tumor Suppressor Proteins

The human body normally produces IL-2. This protein is a type of biological response modifier, a substance that can improve the body’s natural response to disease, enhances the ability of the immune system to kill tumor cells, and may interfere with blood flow to the tumor. Aldesleukin is IL-2 that is made in the laboratory for use in treating cancer and other diseases. Melatonin has now moved rapidly center stage from an area of pure research interest to one of possible therapeutic importance. Melatonin acts in multiple ways within the organism. Of particular interest is the role of melatonin in cancer biology, its potential either by itself or in combination with other drugs in cancer chemotherapy [25]. Numerous studies

FIGURE 10.4. Multiple cross-spectral functions of protein groups: (a) Agnoprotein, (b) T-antigen and Agnoprotein, (c) T-antigen, Agnoprotein and p53 proteins, (d) T-antigen, Agnoprotein and pRb proteins, (e) T-antigen, Agnoprotein, p53 and pRb proteins, ( f ) Agnoprotein and p53 proteins, and (g) Agnoprotein and pRb proteins. The prominent peaks were identified for Agnoprotein at f3 ¼ 0.3047, for T-antigen and Agnoprotein at f4 ¼ 0.2480 and for Agnoprotein and p53 at f5 ¼ 0.3564 (Table 10.3).

270 TUMOUR AND TUMOUR SUPPRESSOR PROTEINS

FIGURE 10.4. Continued.

10.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

271

FIGURE 10.4. Continued.

272 TUMOUR AND TUMOUR SUPPRESSOR PROTEINS

of melatonin and its effects on cancer have been conducted. Some suggest that melatonin extends survival and improves the quality of life for patients with certain types of untreatable cancers. Melatonin combined with IL-2 has been studied as an anticancer treatment [25–28]. In one study of 80 cancer patients, use of melatonin in conjunction with IL-2 led to more tumor regression and better survival rates than treatment with IL-2 alone. However, it was also reported that the results of 32 clinical studies designed to measure the effects of melatonin on cancer were mixed and inconclusive [28]. A study of melatonin’s ability to ease the side effects of chemotherapy drugs found that high doses of the hormone had little effect. It was summarized that the antitumor activity of IL-2 is augmented by melatonin, resulting in a decrease in the number of IL-2 doses needed to exert an anticancer response. Moreover, melatonin may increase the antitumor activity of IL-2 by inhibiting tumor growth factor production. A pilot study was done using low-dose IL-2 plus melatonin in 14 patients with untreatable endocrine tumors. The results suggest that lowdose IL-2 and melatonin may be a well-tolerated therapy for advanced endocrine tumors. Also the results of the study show the objective tumor regression was noted in 3 of the 14 patients (lung, kidney, and liver tumors) [28].

Taking into account the existing documented evidence of the possible influence of melatonin on the biological performance of IL-2, a computational analysis of mutual interactions between melatonin, IL-2, and oncogene proteins using the RRM approach was performed. The values of characteristic frequencies and signal-to noise ratios of each protein group analyzed are shown in Table 10.4. Multiple cross-spectral functions of analyzed protein groups are shown in Figures 10.5a to 10.5g. In addition, the RRM was used to determine the characteristic frequencies of melatonin protein and its interactions with viral and tumor suppressor proteins. The peak frequencies of these selected proteins are shown in Table 10.5. The resulting cross-spectral functions of the analyzed proteins can be observed from Figures 10.6a to 10.6l.

It is proposed that the RRM characteristic frequencies present the common feature of the interacting sequences and thus a common interaction. In our previous work it was also proposed that this characteristic frequency could represent the oscillations of a physical field, which are responsible for information transfer between the interacting biomolecules [9]. As a consequence, it is postulated that

TABLE 10.4 Peak Frequency and Signal-to-Noise Ratio of Protein Groups

 

 

 

 

 

 

Standard Error,

Protein Group

Frequency

Signal-to-Noise

No. Sequence

1/No. Seq.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oncogene

0:0317

 

408.77

45

0.022

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IL-2

0:0303

 

222.68

23

0.043

Melatonin

0.0205

 

403.58

28

0.036

IL-2, Melatonin

0.0283

 

486.17

51

0.020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IL-2, Oncogene

0:0322

 

435.09

68

0.015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IL-2, Melatonin,

0:0303

 

500.60

96

0.010

Oncogene

 

 

 

 

 

 

Melatonin, Oncogene

0.3379

 

493.50

73

0.014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FIGURE 10.5. Multiple cross-spectral functions of protein groups analysed: (a) Oncogene, (b) Inerleukin-2, (c) Melatonin, (d) Interleukin-2 and Melatonin, (e) Interleukin-2 and Oncogene, ( f ) Interleukin-2, Melatonin and Oncogene, and (g) Melatonin and Oncogene proteins. Prominent peaks were identified for Oncogenes at fx ¼ 0.0317, Melatonin at fy ¼ 0.0205, Melatonin and Oncogene at fz ¼ 0.3379.