Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_37_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
17 Мб
Скачать
☆
CHAPTER 10 Pharmacology in Neonatal Care
https://t.me/medicina_free
229
micafungin clearance compared with older patients and required a threefold-higher dose than adults to achieve similar drug exposures.
34,77
Decreased
protein-bound micafungin in neonates could explain why neonates have higher clearance rates compared with adults. Neonates demonstrate
a lower fraction of protein-bound micafungin com­pared with adults (96.7% vs. 99.6%). Because there is a greater amount of unbound micafungin in neo­nates, more of the drug is available to the elimination mechanisms, resulting in much faster elimination in the younger population. Due to these differences in neonatal physiology, the micafungin doses needed for treating neonates (10 to 12 mg/kg IV daily in extremely low-birth-weight infants) differ greatly from the doses used to treat adults (100 to 150 mg IV daily, which would be 1.5 to 2 mg/kg/dose based on a 70-kg average adult patient).
DOSE–CONCENTRATION–TIME CONSIDERATIONS RELATED TO AGE
In the NICU, doses and intervals must be adjusted based on changes in the dose–concen­tration and the concentration–response relation­ships. Measurements of total drug concentrations
using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) enable a more accurate and precise response to changes in dose–concentration effects. Unfortunately, not all drugs have TDM assays readily available for clini­cians. As with the micafungin case, clinicians must observe for clinical effects and assess the influences of other factors that can affect free drug concentra­tions to estimate drug efficacy and the responsive­ness of receptors and cellular processes to the drug.
As noted earlier, pharmacokinetics describes the
delivery and removal of a drug to and from the body.
Four major processes can affect a drug’s disposi­tion: drug entry (absorption), distribution, biotrans­formation (metabolism), and elimination. Doses and
dose intervals are expressed mathematically by pharma­cokinetic parameters related to absorption, distribution, biotransformation, and elimination, such as the time to reach maximum drug concentrations, volume of distri­bution, clearance, and half-life. There are many factors unique to newborns that can alter the dose–concentra­tion relationships seen in this population.
Absorption
The process of absorption defines the rate and amount of a drug that enters the bloodstream.
In the NICU, various routes are used for drug administration. Drugs are frequently given directly into the bloodstream by IV injection. When a drug is given through IV injection, it is said to have
100% bioavailability, meaning that all of the drug given reach the circulatory system. Drugs
are also frequently given by other means that do not introduce drugs directly into the bloodstream, including intramuscularly, via inhalation, intranasally, intrarectally, topically, and subcutaneously. When extravascular administration methods are used, the drug must overcome physical, chemical, mechani­cal, and biologic variables to enter the circulation. Oftentimes, these obstacles can result in a bioavail­ability that is less than 100%, meaning that not all of the drug administered will reach the bloodstream. When considering extravascular administration,
clinicians must keep in mind the clinical and developmental stage of the patient. For example,
in extremely premature infants, transdermal absorp­tion is much greater than in term infants due to a thinner stratum corneum and less adipose tissue, but intestinal absorption in the extremely premature infant may be less due to slower transit time and delayed gastric emptying.
40,77
Bioavailability is represented by the parameter
F, indicating the percentage of administered drug that becomes available in the systemic circulation, with F = 1 indicating the drug is 100% available.
Systematic studies of absorption in critically ill new­borns are lacking, and differences in absorptive pro­cesses are expected but generally remain unmeasured. Some differences in newborns that potentially affect bioavailability include developmental changes in the surface area and permeability of gastrointestinal (GI) mucosa, age-dependent changes in acid secretion in the stomach (neonates have higher gastric pH than in older children and adults in the first postnatal days), changes in gastric emptying time and total GI transit time, and the composition of intestinal microflora. Drugs such as ranitidine and metoclopramide also affect the absorption of other medications by altering gastric and intestinal pH and gastric emptying time and intestinal motility (faster transit time results in less absorption).
77
First-pass elimination occurs when a drug
is eliminated after administration but prior to reaching the systemic circulation. Common sites
of first-pass metabolism for orally administered drugs include the liver and the gastrointestinal tract. Other sites of first-pass elimination include the
UNIT TWO Support of the Neonate230
https://t.me/medicina_free
vascular endothelium and lungs.64 Different drugs
are absorbed at different rates, and different formulations of the same drug may be pro­tected from first-pass metabolism.37 The first-pass
phenomenon is why many drugs (e.g., furosemide, propranolol, morphine) require larger doses when given orally compared with intravenously.
Distribution
Medications rely on many factors for distribu­tion to their sites of action, including blood flow, organ size, presence of drug transporters, and drug permeability. The volume of distribution (Vd) for a drug is a parameter that relates the total amount of drug distributed throughout the body to the serum or plasma concentration.14
It is an attempt to quantify the space in which the drug can go. Strictly defined, the volume of distribution is the hypothetical volume of body fluid necessary to dissolve the total amount of drug as found in the serum. The volume of distribution
must be used to estimate the amount of a load­ing dose or a change in plasma concentration with any bolus dose.
The volume of distribution usually is expressed as a function of body weight, with units of volume per kilogram. Major factors that affect the volume
of distribution include plasma protein binding and body composition.8 Changes in body com-
position happen throughout fetal and newborn life. Total body water as a percentage of body
weight decreases with increasing age: 85% in extremely preterm infants; 70% in term infants; and 55% in most adults. Total body water may
increase with conditions such as the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) excretion. About half of the total body water is found in the extracellular space in a healthy term neonate, where large, water-soluble drugs will tend to accumulate. Intravascular water
makes up only about 10% of the body weight; protein-bound medications are trapped in this smaller compartment. Preterm infants have more
total body water as a percentage of body weight compared with term infants, and water-soluble drugs such as penicillins, aminoglycosides, and cephalosporins have greater volumes of distri­bution in preterm infants than in older infants. Preterm infants also have greater volumes of dis­tribution for these water-soluble drugs and require
a higher dose per kilogram than term infants to achieve the same exposure.
51,77
Plasma protein amounts and binding capaci-
ties also differ with gestational and chronologic age. Protein binding is decreased in newborns due
to lower total amounts of albumin. Additionally, fetal albumin has less capacity to bind certain drugs. Acidic drugs such as ampicillin, phenytoin, and phe­nobarbital bind less to fetal albumin, thus increasing the unbound fraction of the drug, thereby increas­ing the amount of free drug available to exert the drug’s effect. Changes in pH also can affect a
drug’s affinity for albumin.
Fat content varies with gestational age and degree of illness. For fat-soluble drugs, increased adipose tissue increases the volume of distribution for lipophilic drugs such as propofol
and fentanyl.
40,77
As described previously, the interaction of cir­culating unconjugated bilirubin and protein-bound drugs is particularly concerning in neonates. Several
anionic drugs, like ceftriaxone, bind to albumin and can displace bilirubin, increasing free bili­rubin and increasing its potential for neurotox­icity. For other drugs, bilirubin can have a higher
affinity for albumin than the drug; it may displace these drugs from albumin, increasing the concentra­tion of unbound drug and, therefore, the potential to reach toxic levels.
3,5
Biotransformation
Biotransformation, or drug metabolism, occurs most commonly in the liver. Drug metabolism results in the modification of the structure of drugs in the body, leading to their eventual elimination from the body. Phase I metabolism
describes the nonsynthetic metabolism of medica­tions and includes oxidation, reduction, and hydro­lysis reactions. Phase I metabolism does not always inactivate the drug; in some cases, the metabolite formed can retain active properties sometimes more potent than the parent drug. Phase II, also known as conjugation, is synthetic metabolism, in which small molecular moieties are added to the drug in the body to aid in its elimination; examples of phase II metabolism include glucuronidation, sulfation, and acetylation. The enzymes responsible for
these reactions change with age, disease states, and interactions with certain drugs. For exam-
ple, many enzymes responsible for the oxidation
CHAPTER 10 Pharmacology in Neonatal Care
https://t.me/medicina_free
231
and glucuronidation of drugs are decreased in newborns.
Drugs that rely on these reactions for elimina­tion, such as acetaminophen, phenobarbital, and phenytoin, will be eliminated more slowly and result in higher exposures in the neonate compared with the adult. The possibility of prolonged peak concentrations of available drug or active metab­olites for many pharmaceuticals mandates careful monitoring of drug levels and clinical conditions to titrate doses. Additionally, a decrease in plasma pro­tein binding (or any other change in the volume of distribution) may increase the hepatic metabolism and subsequent clearance of a drug, as seen with the micafungin example.
Clearance (Elimination)
Drug clearance or elimination occurs by excretion of the active drug or biotransformation to an inactive metabolite. Most drug-elimination path-
ways can become saturated if the dose is too high or if the dose intervals are too frequent. Most drugs used in the NICU have therapeutic doses less than those necessary to saturate the elimination system. When clearance mechanisms are not saturated, the Css in plasma is proportional to the dose. Clearance
equals the rate of drug elimination divided by the drug concentration.37 Just as the volume of
distribution relates to the loading dose and initial concentration, clearance relates to a maintenance
dose that keeps a drug’s concentration at steady state. The appropriate dose rate can be calculated
if the clinician can specify the desired steady-state plasma concentration and knows the clearance and bioavailability of a drug (from peak and trough lev­els in a particular patient).
RENAL EXCRETION
The kidney is the primary route of excretion for many drugs commonly used in the NICU. The kidney clears drugs through glomerular filtration and tubular secretion. Examples of
medications eliminated through the kidney are aminoglycosides, digoxin, diuretics, and penicillins. Doses and dose intervals of drugs that have renal excretion must be adjusted for age and disease state. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR; the
amount of blood filtered by the kidney in a unit of time) is low at birth and gradually increases over the first few weeks. In preterm infants,
the GFR starts even lower than in term infants, with a significant increase occurring around 34 weeks’ PMA. Nephrogenesis begins at 5 to 6
weeks of gestational age, with over 60% of nephrons being formed during the last trimester.68 Preterm infants born before 36 weeks’ gestational age are at risk of having a decreased nephrogenic potential.1 Tubular secretion also matures with increasing gestational age and depends on tubular function. In adults, aminoglycosides may be dosed based on creatinine clearance, but in neonates less than 1 week old, serum creatinine may reflect maternal levels, as well as renal impairment. Acidosis and a history of hypoxia or ischemia also may modify an infant’s renal function, slowing excretion and altering pharmacokinetics. Again, measuring levels through TDM in cases of suspected renal impair­ment, whether from suspicious history or laboratory values, is important in determining an appropriate dosage strategy.
Half-Life
A drug’s half-life (t½) is the time necessary for the drug concentration to decrease by 50%. The
half-life is used to predict and interpret the time course of changes in plasma drug concentrations and is related to both the volume of distribution (Vd) and clearance (CL). For example, the time to reach Css with repeated dosing is 4 to 5 half-lives. The half-life is useful in selecting dosing intervals and determining whether a loading dose is neces­sary. This concept is illustrated in Fig. 10.3.
Loading doses help expedite the attainment of the desired therapeutic concentrations, espe­cially for drugs with long half-lives, in which a desired effect is needed immediately. For
example, caffeine is a drug used to treat apnea of prematurity in premature infants. In this patient population, the half-life of caffeine can be as long as 3 to 4 days. Given that the time to reach Css is 4 to 5 half-lives, administering just the maintenance dose will require 12 to 20 days to reach the target concentration and presumably achieve a therapeutic response. For this reason, a loading dose is given to reach the target concentration immediately to achieve a rapid therapeutic response. For drugs with one-compartment distribution that stay in the circulation and are not stored in cells or tissue, the loading dose may be given as a single dose. Drugs that are fat soluble or stored intracellularly are more
UNIT TWO Support of the Neonate232
LD (Vd C)/ F 0.8 L/kg × 20mg/L
16mg of caffeine/kg
=
=
=
×
Time (hours)
Serum drug concentration
ls
https://t.me/medicina_free
Maximum safe concentration
Minimum effective concentration
Accumulation to toxic leve Optimal therapeutic levels Subtherapeutic levels
03 6912
FIGURE 10.3 Effect on serum drug concentration of multiple dosages along with different time intervals between doses. (From Roberts
RJ. Drug Therapy in Infants. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1984.)
15 18 21 24
difficult to assess, and the volume of distribution of those drugs must be included in the loading-dose assessment.
preterm infants is 0.8 L/kg, 20 mg/L is the desired concentration, and F for an IV dose is assumed to be 1, a loading dose can be calculated as follows:
depressed newborn undergoing therapeutic hypo-
thermia, the prolonged half-life of medications is due to significantly reduced metabolism and clearance. For example, studies have shown that
phenobarbital has a prolonged half-life of 8 to 22 days in these patients. clearance and longer half-life of gentamicin in cool­ing infants mandates spacing out the dosing intervals to every 36 hours versus the standard dosing of every 24 hours to prevent accumulation.
Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics
In the 30,000-plus known genes, there are over 4 million “common” variants (occurring in more than 1% of the population), many of which directly affect the function of the coded proteins. In certain cases,
these genetic differences can result in changes in
If the volume of distribution for caffeine in
In certain clinical conditions, such as a birth-
23,74
Similarly, the decreased
26
the expression and function of proteins involved in the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination of certain drugs. These changes can lead
to significant clinical consequences. Pharmacogenetics
is the study of the role of inheritance in the indi­vidual variation in drug response. Pharmacogenomics is the study of the influence of multiple genes, and their interaction with each other and the environment, on drug effects.
15,68,77
Genetic variations affecting the ability of patients to metabolize drugs have been well described. Over 40 years ago, one of the first reports of a genetically caused variation in drug metabolism focused on butyrylcholinesterase, the enzyme responsible for the hydrolysis of succinylcholine. One in 3500 people is homozygous for the gene encoding an atypical form of butyrylcholinesterase. Patients with the atypical form of the enzyme are poor metabolizers of succinylcholine and thus eliminate succinylcho­line much more slowly than people with the normal enzyme variant. Because metabolism is significantly hindered in patients with the atypical enzyme form, succinylcholine levels in patients with the atypical variant are more likely to accumulate to levels that can lead to prolonged muscle paralysis.
The cytochrome P-450 (CYP) enzymes are a group of enzymes responsible for the metabolism and subsequent elimination of many of the drugs used to treat patients. CYP2D6 is an example of a CYP enzyme with genetic variations resulting in clinically significant consequences. Codeine is an opioid used in the treatment of pain. For codeine
CHAPTER 10 Pharmacology in Neonatal Care
https://t.me/medicina_free
233
to achieve its clinical effect of pain relief, it must first be converted by CYP2D6 to its active form, which is morphine. Certain patients have genetic variants of this enzyme that result in decreased function of CYP2D6, thus making these patients poor codeine metabolizers and, therefore, poor responders to codeine. There are also patients who have genetic variants that result in increased function of CYP2D6, thus making these patients ultra-rapid metabolizers of codeine. These patients can metabolize codeine into morphine much faster than the normal patient, resulting in faster formation and accumulation of morphine and increased risk for toxicity. This can have especially important consequences in breastfeeding women.
A breastfeeding woman who is an ultra-rapid metabolizer of codeine can develop morphine levels high enough to transfer to her infant through the breast milk and lead to signs of opioid toxicity in the infant, such as sleepiness,
poor feeding, and even respiratory depression. In the worst cases, this has resulted in infant death due to morphine toxicity.47 In 2007, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a public health advisory on life-threatening side effects in nursing babies of some women who were prescribed and taking codeine. Since then, the FDA (and the European Medicines Agency)21 issued a strengthened warning in 2017 for codeine and a new warning for tramadol in breastfeeding mothers due to the same concern with ultra-rapid metabolizers.
A genetic variant in mitochondrial DNA, the A1555G mutation, has been linked to a risk of hearing loss associated with aminoglycoside tox­icity. The frequency of this mutation in the general
population is estimated to be between 1% and 3%, but among deaf subjects tested, the concurrence of deafness with the aminoglycoside treatment associated with this mutation is more common. This suggests that in the future, testing for the mutation before the use of aminoglycosides might be warranted. However, it is currently unknown whether tighter control of amino­glycoside levels in these patients would reduce the risk of hearing loss. No recommendations can be made until more extensive, population-based studies are done. Such studies must include controlling for drug levels and duration and genotypes in the assessment of the risk of hearing loss.
In addition to drug metabolism, genetic variants can also affect the expression and function of drug
83
56
targets. These include adrenergic and dopamine receptors and enzymes, such as acetylcholinesterase, and are likely to have effects on the response to drugs targeting these proteins, such as bronchodilators, vaso­pressors, and inotropes, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors such as enalapril and captopril.
There have been few studies focused on phar­macogenomics in neonates, particularly those who are premature. However, genetic differences with clinically important consequences have been described in premature infants.4 For example, polymorphisms in the enzyme UGT2B7, which is responsible for the metabolism of morphine, have resulted in pharmacokinetic differences in infants treated with morphine.48 Also, polymor­phisms affecting the expression of the opioid receptors upon which morphine exerts its effects have resulted in differences in the need for rescue doses of morphine among premature infants on mechanical ventilators.49 Still, very little is known about the clinical effects of many genetic poly­morphisms among infants; pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics are areas deserving more study in infants.
DATA COLLECTION
Monitoring Safety and Efficacy of Pharmacotherapies in the Clinical Setting
Clinicians must be aware of a medication’s desired therapeutic effects, side effects, and tox­icities; know when these are expected to occur; and continuously monitor for these effects.
Whether or not a dose effect occurs requires docu­mentation. The exact time when therapeutic drug
monitoring is conducted should be recorded in order to accurately evaluate the dose–plasma concentration. If the drug’s serum concentration
relates to clinical response, the plasma concentration should be monitored in addition to clinical signs. To optimally assess drug serum levels, the expected plasma concentration is calculated from the dosage history, and patient variables that may affect phar­macokinetics and the timing of blood samples are considered. A comparison of expected values with measured values allows rational adjustment of future dosages.15 Potential explanations for differences
UNIT TWO Support of the Neonate234
½
Total body weight : 1 kg
t
Time to stead
Css F Dose / (Dose interval C1)
26mg/L
https://t.me/medicina_free
BOX
10.1
POTENTIAL EXPLANATIONS FOR DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN MEASURED AND EXPECTED DRUG CONCENTRATIONS
• Inadequatecompliance • Inadequatemedicationdelivery • Inappropriatetimingofsamples • Laboratoryerror • RevisionininitialestimatesofnecessarypKrequired
pK, Pharmacokinetics.
between measured and expected concentrations are listed in Box 10.1.
Even if predictable pharmacokinetic and phar­macodynamic changes are considered, other fac­tors may influence a drug’s effect. Clinical end points must be followed and recorded, with dosage regimens adjusted accordingly. One exam­ple is the monitoring of renal function with indomethacin dosage; an indication for using IV indomethacin is for treatment of hemodynami­cally significant patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). Some of these infants may exhibit compromised perfusion to their kidneys because of the PDA steal phenomenon. However, if clinical signs
of renal dysfunction (a potential side effect of indomethacin) are noted, the drug is not administered. A pharmacist on the caregiv­ing team can clarify the dose and disposition parameters for individual neonates with a variety of conditions.
If a suboptimal clinical response is noted in conjunction with a subtherapeutic plasma con­centration, revised estimates of clearance require adjustments with one or two available plasma concentrations. If a single level is drawn after drug absorption and distribution are complete or concentrations are near steady state, then the maintenance-dose formula can be rearranged to calculate the revised clearance. The commonsense approach suggests that if a patient has half the expected concentration of a drug, then perhaps the clearance is twice the initial estimate. If the patient has twice the expected concentration, the clear­ance likely is half the initial estimate. However, this technique is misleading if a steady state has not been reached. If a drug’s level is higher than
expected and higher than what is considered safe, or if toxicity is noted, the drug should be
discontinued until the concentration decreases to the appropriate target range.
Examples
The following examples illustrate the need to pay
close attention to issues of dose and clinical effects. The following examples are for caffeine citrate in neonates. The half-life of caffeine citrate in prema­ture neonates is 3 to 4 days, the Vd is 0.8 to 0.9 L/ kg, and clearance is 0.008 L/kg/h.
EXAMPLE 1: A 15-day-old, 1-kg preterm
infant receives oral caffeine for apnea of prematu­rity. After the loading dose of 20 mg/kg, the infant has received 5 mg every 24 hours of caffeine for 5 days. At 8 am on the fifth day, 4 hours after the last dose, the baby’s heart rate is more than 180 beats/ min, but apnea has not been a problem. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of tachycardia includes consideration of caffeine toxicity. A blood sample for caffeine is sent to the laboratory. To estimate the concentration of caffeine, use the following formula:
Necessary data (assume F = 1):
Vd 0.8 L / kg 0.8 L in this patient
C1 0.00
t 0.7 Vd / C1 0.7 0.8 L / (0.008 L/hr)
Therefore:
The Css was estimated using average Vd and Cl values reported in similar infants, adjusted for this infant’s weight. If this infant has diminished clear­ance relative to the “average” infant, toxicity may result from the standard dose. Toxicity may not have been noted until day 5 because of the estimated time to steady state (Tss) of 115 hours.
EXAMPLE 2: When the next dose of caffeine is
due at 4 am, 24 hours after the last dose, a caffeine concentration of 27 mg/L is reported. This is within the therapeutic range for caffeine in neonates, but this infant is exhibiting tachycardia, a side effect of the
8 L/ kg/ hr 0.008L / hr in this patien
½
70h
y state (Tss) 4t280 h
1 5 mg/(24 hr 0.008 L/hr )
CHAPTER 10 Pharmacology in Neonatal Care
Clearance revised F Dose / (Interval Css)
0.008L/h
Revised t 0.7 Vd/ C1
0.7 0.7L/0.008 L/h 70 h
Dose (Interval C 1 Css)/ F
1
3.8 mg caffeine PO q 24 h
https://t.me/medicina_free
235
drug, at this level. His heart rate is now consistently >190 beats/min. The patient is stable on room air, with no occurrence of apnea. Because of the slightly higher-than-expected level, it is most likely the result of decreased clearance. Using this concentration, esti­mate the time when the concentration will decline to 20 mg/L, and determine a 24-hour dosage sched­ule to maintain that concentration. The 4 am dose is held, and the tachycardia resolves 24 hours later.
1 5 m g/(24h 27 mg/L )
desiver½
Therefore, the concentration 70 hours later should be one half of the measured 27 mg/L, or about 13.5 mg/L. To maintain a concentration of 20 mg/L:
revised
(24 hours 0.008L/h 20 mg / L)/
EXAMPLE 3: Before the new oral regimen is
initiated, another blood specimen is drawn 70 hours after the first and is found to be 14 mg/L. Because tachycardia has resolved, an oral regimen based on the last two levels is resumed to maintain a caffeine concentration of 20 mg/L. Estimate the necessary maintenance dose: The concentration fell 50%, from 27 to 13.5 mg/L in 70 hours, which confirmed our original estimate of half-life. Although caffeine has a wide therapeutic index, clinicians can use TDM and pharmacokinetic calculations to help individ­ualize dosing regimens to provide optimal clinical responses while minimizing side effects.
PHARMACOLOGY AND BREASTFEEDING CATEGORIES
Breastfeeding mothers may require treatment with medications for acute or chronic conditions, result­ing in concerns for safety with exposures to drugs excreted in breast milk. In all cases, the benefits of
breastfeeding must be weighed against the risk of drug exposures to the infant. When possible, certain
considerations may be taken to lessen the risk of unin­tended drug exposures to the infant through breast
milk, including the following: avoidance of long-acting medication formulations, timing medications with breastfeeding to achieve minimum concentrations at the time of feedings, choosing medications that will accumulate the least in breast milk, providing a ther­apeutic interchange with another medication that has a safer profile in neonates, and monitoring the infant closely for abnormal signs and symptoms related to the medications being taken by the mother.
66,67,71
Although most medications are safe for moth­ers and the nursing infant, some drugs are known to potentially cause harm to the nursing infant and are contraindicated during breastfeeding, such as anticancer drugs and drugs with radioactiv­ity.87 Lactation risk categories can be assigned to drugs based on available information.32 Categories range from safest, designated as L1, to hazardous, designated as L5. Only drugs categorized as L5 are contraindicated during breastfeeding. Other categories require balancing of risk versus benefit to the mother and the infant in the decision on whether to allow breastfeeding in conjunction with the medication being questioned. Table 18.7 pro-
vides information about specific maternal drugs excreted in breast milk.
DRUG CATEGORIES
Antimicrobial Agents
Antimicrobial agents inhibit microbial growth or kill microorganisms; they include antibacte­rial, antiviral, and antifungal agents. Bacteriostatic
agents limit microbial growth, allowing host defenses to control spread; this will not reliably eliminate a pathogen but can prevent its proliferation. Bactericidal agents kill the pathogen. Bactericidal agents at low concentrations may be bacteriostatic. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is the lowest concen­tration of an antimicrobial that stops the spread of an organism in laboratory culture media. This cannot be directly measured in an infected neo­nate and depends on tissue concentration and the number of bacteria present. The minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) is the lowest concentration of antimicrobial that reduces the microbial number in laboratory media by 99.9%. Pathogens can develop resistance to antimicrobials by changing their cellular structures or producing enzymes that reduce anti­microbial activity.
UNIT TWO Support of the Neonate236
https://t.me/medicina_free
For effective antimicrobial action, the drug must reach an adequate concentration in the infected tissue. The ideal concentration elicits a maximum effect on the pathogen with minimum effects on the patient. Selection criteria for antimi-
crobials include the microorganism’s sensitivity, the availability of the drug to the target tissue (e.g., when treating central nervous system (CNS) infections, it is important to note that some antibiotics do not cross the blood–brain barrier), the bioactivity of the antimicrobial in the target tissue, the known MIC and MBC relative to side-effect and toxic-effect levels for the medication, and the infant’s biologic state—that is, whether the systems of absorbance (e.g., intestinal integrity) and elimination (e.g., kid­ney and liver function) are working adequately for effective and safe drug delivery and removal. When
the use of antimicrobial agents is planned in an infant, as with other drugs, consideration must be given to clinical status and PMA and PNA in order to appropriately select the right drug at the right dose for the right indication for the right duration.
In particular, the pharmacokinetics of antifungal drugs in neonates have been studied, and these data have guided optimal dosing in the neonatal popula­tion for an infection associated with high morbidity and mortality rates.
6,20,44
For example, one cited study on the use of fluconazole, a synthetic triazole, suggested that a loading dose (25 mg/kg) prior to starting maintenance dosing achieved the therapeutic target more rapidly than without a loading dose in infants.63 When treating Candida infections in neo­nates, immediate attainment of the target level of flu­conazole (area under the concentration curve/MIC) is paramount. As more pharmacokinetic studies of commonly used antimicrobials in critically ill neo­nates are completed, such as with clindamycin, met­ronidazole, piperacillin-tazobactam, and meropenem, dosing regimens based on PMA and PNA continue to be updated and improved in the NICU.
17,18,29,52,76
Diuretics
Diuretics are used in the NICU to remove exces­sive extracellular fluid. Diuretics commonly cause a loss of electrolytes along with water. Response
to any diuretic depends on renal function and the drug’s ability to reach its target in ade­quate amounts. Most diuretics work within the tubule, but any drug that increases GFR can
increase water loss. Drugs that increase cardiac
output without decreasing renal perfusion, and others that specifically increase renal blood flow, can also cause diuresis.
In infants, renal tubular function improves
with increasing chronologic and gestational age.
Poor absorption and response to aldosterone (espe­cially in extremely preterm infants) and electrolyte losses can be clinically significant with the addition of a loop diuretic such as furosemide or bumetanide. The ongoing losses may lead to hypochloremic metabolic alkalosis and less response to the diuretic.
Delivery of diuretics to the kidney loop
increases with increasing chronologic and ges­tational age. Most diuretics rely on secretion from
the proximal tubule and filtration through the glomerulus to reach their site of action. Both these functions improve with age. Enteral absorption of some diuretics is limited, so clinical effectiveness and electrolyte stability must be monitored closely to help determine safe and effective dosage regimens. The kidney also is responsible for diuretic excretion, again through tubular secretion and glomerular filtration. These functions are age dependent; the clinician must ensure that the clearance time is ade­quate to avoid toxic levels.
Cardiovascular Drugs
Medicines used to improve cardiovascular function include digitalis and the sympathomimetic amines, which include drugs such as dopamine, dobuta­mine, and epinephrine. Antiarrhythmics, including
digoxin, act to control the electrical conduction within the myocardium.
The sympathomimetic amines bind to β and G
receptors; the number and availability of receptors determine response. A β1 receptor response leads to constriction of vascular smooth muscle. β2 receptors cause a decrease in GI motility. Stimulation of the G1 receptor stimulates cardiac contractility, and the G2 response includes vascular and bronchial smooth muscle relaxation. The response in any individ­ual, and in any individual’s specific organ system, depends on the relative amount of these receptors. Receptor numbers and their linked response ele­ments within cells vary with gestation and clinical condition, and the response must be monitored to aid in dosage decisions. Prolonged administration of sympathomimetic amines can lead to a decreased response—an example of tachyphylaxis.
CHAPTER 10 Pharmacology in Neonatal Care
https://t.me/medicina_free
237
Antihypertensive agents occasionally are used
in neonates for essential hypertension and occa­sionally to decrease afterload in infants with heart failure. These include volume reducers such
as diuretics, inhibitors of physiologic regulators of blood pressure like enalapril, and drugs that decrease vascular resistance through β and G receptors. ACE inhibitors, such as enalapril, should be avoided in preterm infants because they are at significant risk of acute renal failure after exposure to this class of
41,43,45
drugs.
The pathophysiology of neonatal disease should direct the choice of cardiovascular agent. Extremely close monitoring of physiologic effects helps deter­mine the safety and efficacy of therapy. Monitoring must include very frequent, if not continuous, monitoring of blood pressure, heart rate, perfusion, and oxygen saturation (preductal and postductal in some cases). Other drugs are often given con-
comitantly while a neonate is receiving cardio­vascular medicines; thus, thorough knowledge of possible drug interactions is mandatory. The
absorption of cardiovascular drugs is unpredictable.
The sympathomimetic amines, such as epineph­rine, must be given by the IV route unless used in an emergency situation in which endotracheal (ET) administration is indicated. Once dosed,
the drug must be delivered to the target organ sys­tem. Infants in shock may not have the circulatory wherewithal to deliver the medication to elicit the desired therapeutic response. Due to the variability in β- and G-receptor development and distribution, undesired side effects in various organ systems may accompany desired responses. Rapid metabolism
of the sympathomimetic amines demands con­tinuous IV infusion, and infiltration of IV fluids may lead to significant tissue damage. Along
with the physiologic effects, these IV lines must be carefully monitored to prevent adverse effects as well as to ensure the infant receives the drug.
46,72
Also related to the cardiovascular system are drugs used to treat patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in neonates. The ductus arteriosus is a vascular connection between the aorta and the pulmonary artery. In utero, the ductus arteriosus serves the important function of bypassing blood flow away from the nonfunctioning fetal lungs and back into the systemic circulation through the aorta, where the blood can then travel to the placenta. The ductus arteriosus typically closes spontaneously after birth. If the ductus arteriosus fails to close
after birth, the resulting PDA can result in shunt­ing of blood away from the body and back to the lungs and cause significant problems to the infant, including pulmonary overcirculation and decreased perfusion to vital organs such as the kidneys. The presence of prostaglandins is known to keep the ductus arteriosus patent, which can be produced endogenously by the infant at the ductus arteriosus or be administered as a drug for certain congenital heart defects.
Pharmacotherapies are used to treat a PDA
when more conservative treatments, including volume restriction and diuretics, have failed.
These pharmacotherapies are directed at inhibiting the formation of prostaglandins at the ductus arterio­sus. Indomethacin, a nonsteroidal anti- inflammatory drug (NSAID), is often used to treat a PDA in these cases. Indomethacin works by inhibiting the enzyme cyclooxygenase, which prevents the forma­tion of prostaglandins, allowing the PDA to close.50
When indomethacin is used, close monitoring is necessary for several important side effects, including decreased kidney function and throm­bocytopenia. Contraindications against the use of indomethacin include extremely elevated serum creatinine levels, severe oliguria or anuria, and severe thrombocytopenia. Studies have also demonstrated an increased risk in the devel­opment of spontaneous intestinal perforations among premature infants treated with indometh­acin and hydrocortisone concomitantly; the use of indomethacin with hydrocortisone, and likely other corticosteroids, in this population should be avoided if possible.
86
More recently, there has been increased use of acetaminophen/paracetamol for the treatment of PDA in infants. Acetaminophen may cause PDA closure through the inhibition of prostaglandins, although the exact mechanism of how acetamin­ophen results in PDA closure is still unknown. A recent Cochrane review evaluating eight studies that included a total of 916 preterm infants demon­strated that acetaminophen performed similarly
to ibuprofen or indomethacin and better than placebo for successfully treating PDAs.59
Furthermore, acetaminophen may be safer than ibuprofen or indomethacin, without the adverse effects related to NSAIDs, including decreased renal and mesenteric blood flow. However, the authors of the review concluded that further studies, including long-term neurodevelopment
UNIT TWO Support of the Neonate238
https://t.me/medicina_free
outcome studies, must be conducted before acet­aminophen can be recommended as a standard treatment for PDAs.
59
Central and Peripheral Nervous System Drugs
Nervous system drugs include analgesics, which
decrease pain sensations; anesthetics, which con­trol pain peripherally or in the CNS; sedatives/ hypnotics, including barbiturates (phenobarbital) and nonbarbiturates (lorazepam), which do not control pain and can control some seizures; and antiepileptic agents, which are designed to con­trol seizures (phenytoin, fosphenytoin). These
drugs are associated with problems of addiction, tolerance, dependence, and withdrawal.
Neonates are incapable of developing addic-
tion but are able to develop tolerance, depen­dence, and withdrawal to these medications.
Addiction is a complex lifestyle change that involves drug-seeking behavior, which is not applicable to neonates. Tolerance occurs with many drug types. Tolerance exists when increasing doses and serum concentrations of a medicine are necessary to achieve a desired effect. A patient is dependent on a medication when regular drug administration is necessary for physical well-being. Withdrawal is a collection of physiologic and behavioral signs attributed to the absence of a medication in a dependent individual. There are two distinct types of withdrawal in neonatal patients. Neonatal
abstinence syndrome is secondary to in utero exposure to illicit substances, such as heroin,
or prescribed medications, such as methadone or buprenorphine, taken by mothers during pregnancy.
Iatrogenic withdrawal is induced by prolonged exposure to opioids, benzodiazepines, and other sedatives used in sick infants who often require prolonged mechanical ventilation. Withdrawal
has been identified for many medications, but it has been classified and described, along with weaning protocols, for opioid analgesics and benzodiaze­pines22 (see Chapter 11).
The mechanism of most CNS medications
is not clearly known. Again, careful monitoring
of therapeutic effects relative to dose, duration, and serum concentrations is extremely important.
Significant respiratory depression can occur with most CNS medications, so appropriate resusci­tation equipment must be available. Variations in
hepatic metabolism and the volume of distribution are important in the ongoing assessment of dose response. Some medications are highly fat bound and are slowly released into the circulatory system, causing prolonged effects, both therapeutic and undesired (e.g., respiratory depression, poor gastric motility, and abnormal neurologic function such as feeding difficulties).
If therapeutic hypothermia is used for infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), evidence suggests that opioids accumulate in the circulation in excess of the accumulation in similar infants with HIE who are not cooled. Therefore, when using opioids in cooled infants with HIE, opioid levels are likely to be higher than expected for a given dose, and the expec­tations for the neurologic examination must be modified given the accumulation of high levels and delayed neurologic findings.
68
Pharmacokinetics During Hypothermia
In recent years, therapeutic hypothermia has
become the standard approach in NICUs for term newborns with neonatal HIE.72 (see
Chapter 26) Therapeutic hypothermia entails
lowering the core body temperature below 34°C for the first 72 postnatal hours, followed by gradual rewarming.73 Neonatal HIE is often
accompanied by metabolic acidemia in the first postnatal hours to days, along with kidney and liver injury. This complex combination of end-organ injury and cooling below the usual physiologic core body temperature influences the pharmacokinetics of commonly used medications in the NICU.
Antiepileptics, opioids, and antibiotics are among the more commonly used medications for infants with HIE. In adults, the systemic clear-
ance of drugs metabolized by cytochrome P-450 is decreased between approximately 7% and 22% per degree Celsius below 37°C during cooling. Several studies have assessed specific medications often used for term neonates with HIE.
Hypoxic newborns are at high risk of sei­zures. Clinicians who are treating these infants
with HIE should understand the antiepileptic agents and their dosing and pharmacokinetic profiles.
Phenobarbital (PB) administered to newborns under whole-body hypothermia results in higher plasma concentrations and longer half-lives
89