Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_37_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
17 Мб
Скачать
☆
CHAPTER 8 Acid-Base Homeostasis and Oxygenation
https://t.me/medicina_free
199
REFERENCES
1. Adrogué HE, Adrogué HJ. Acid-base physiology. Respir Care. 2001;46(4):328.
2. Aiken CG. History of medical understanding and misunder­standing of acid base balance. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(9):2038.
3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Com­mittee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion No 348: umbilical cord blood gas and acid-base analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(5):1319.
4. Andersson O, Hellstrom-Westas L, Andersson D, Clausen J, Domellof M. Effects of delayed compared with early umbilical cord clamping on maternal postpartum hemorrhage and cord blood sampling: a randomized trial. Acta Obstet et Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(5):567.
5. Armstrong L, Stenson B. Effect of delayed sampling on umbilical cord arterial and venous lactate and blood gases in clamped and unclamped vessels. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006;91(5):F342.
6. Aschner JL, Poland RL. Sodium bicarbonate: basically useless therapy. Pediatrics. 2008;122(4):831.
7. Berg CS, Barnette AR, Myers BJ, et al. Sodium bicarbonate administration and outcome in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2010;157:684.
8. Blickstein I, Green T. Umbilical cord blood gases. Clin Perinatol. 2007;34:451.
9. Boyle M, Lawrence J. An easy method of mentally estimating the metabolic component of acid/base balance using the Fen­cl-Stewart approach. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2003;31:538.
10. Breen PH. Arterial blood gas and pH analysis: clinical approach and interpretation. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2001;19:885.
11. Brusilow SW. Hyperammonemic encephalopathy. Medicine. 2002;81:240.
12. Buonocore G, Perrone S, Tataranno ML. Oxygen toxicity: chemistry and biology of reactive oxygen species. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;15:186.
13. Collins A, Sahni R. Uses and misuses of sodium bicarbonate in the neonatal intensive care unit. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;22(5):336.
14. Delivoria-Papadopoulos M, Roncevic NP, Oski FA. Postnatal changes in oxygen transport of term, premature, and sick infants: the role of red cell 2,3-diphosphoglycerate and adult hemoglobin. Pediatr Res. 1971;5:235.
15. Dubin A, Menises MM, Masevicius FD, et al. Comparison of three different methods of evaluation of acid base disorder. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(5):1264.
16. Durward A, Mayer A, Skellett S, et al. Hypoalbuminaemia in critically ill children: incidence, prognosis, and influence on the anion gap. Arch Dis Child. 2003;88(5):419.
17. Epstein SK, Singh N. Respiratory acidosis. Respir Care. 2001;46(4):366.
18. Fencl V, Jabor A, Kazda A, et al. Diagnosis of metabolic ac­id-base disturbances in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162(6):2246.
19. Finer NN, Barrington KJ. Nitric oxide for respiratory failure in infants born at or near term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;1:CD000399.
20. Foster GT, Vazir i ND, Sassoon CS. Respiratory alkalosis. Respir Care. 2001;46(4):384.
21. Garite TJ. Intrapartum fetal evaluation. In: Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson FL, Landon MB, Galan HL, Jauniaux ERM, Driscoll DA, eds. Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies. 6th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Saunders; 2012:340.
22. Georgieva A, Moulden M, Redman CWG. Umbilical cord gases in relation to the neonatal condition: the EveREst plot. Eur J Obstet Gynecol, Reprod Biol. 2013;168(2):155.
23. Gleason CA, Short BL, Jones DM. Cerebral blood flow and metabolism during and after prolonged hypocapnia in newborn lambs. J Pediatr. 1989;115(2):309.
24. Gunnerson KJ, Kellum JA. Acid-base and electrolyte analysis in critically ill patients: are we ready for the new millennium? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2003;9(6):468.
25. Hafstrom M, Ehnberg S, Blad S, et al. Developmental outcome at 6.5 years after acidosis in term newborns: a population-based study. Pediatrics. 2012;129(6):e1501.
26. Hatherill M, Waggie Z, Purves L, et al. Correction of the anion gap for albumin in order to detect occult tissue anions in shock. Arch Dis Child. 2002;87(6):526.
27. Hermansen L, Osnes JB. Blood and muscle pH after maximal exercise in man. J Appl Physiol. 1972;32(3):304.
28. Jobe AH, Kallapur SG. Long term consequences of oxy­gen therapy in the neonatal period. Sem Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;15(4):230.
29. Kellum JA. Clinical review: reunification of acid-base disorders. Crit Care. 2005;9(5):500.
30. Khanna A, Kurtzman NA. Metabolic alkalosis. Respir Care. 2001;46(4):354.
31. King TA, Jackson GL, Josey AS, et al. The effect of profound umbilical artery academia in term neonates admitted to a newborn nursery. J Pediatr. 1998;132(4):624.
32. Kirksey KM, Holt-Ashley M, Goodroad BK. An easy method for interpreting the results of arterial blood gas analysis. Crit Care Nurs. 2001;21(5):49.
33. Kraut JA, Madias NE. Approach to patients with acid-base disorders. Respir Care. 2001;46(4):392.
34. Kurtz I, Kraut J, Or nekian V, et al. Acid-base analysis: a critique of the Stewart and bicarbonate-centered approaches. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008;294(5):F1009.
35. Levraut J, Grimaud D. Treatment of metabolic acidosis. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2003;9(4):260.
36. Low JA, Lindsay BG, Derrick EJ. Threshold of metabolic acidosis associated with newborn complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(6):1391.
37. Malin GL, Morros RK, Khan KS. Strength of association between umbilical cord pH and perinatal and long term out­comes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;340:1.
38. Mokarami P, Wiberg N, Olofsson P. Hidden acidosis: an expla­nation of acid-base and lactate changes occurring in umbilical cord blood after delayed sampling. BJOG. 2013;120(8):996.
39. Mokarami P, Wieberg N, Olofsson P. An overlooked aspect on metabolic acidosis at birth: blood gas analyzers calculate base deficit differently. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(5):574.
40. Olivia PB. Severe alveolar hypoventilation in a patient with metabolic alkalosis. Am J Med. 1971;52:817.
41. Pomerance J. Interpreting Umbilical Cord Blood Gases; for Clini- cians Caring for the Fetus or Newborn. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA; 2012:16–23.
42. Safar P, Nemoto EM, Severinghaus JW. Pathogenesis of central nervous system disorder during artificial hyperventilation in compensated hypercarbia in dogs. Crit Care Med. 1973;1(1):5.
43. Sandberg K, Sjöqvist BA, Hjalmarson O, et al. Lung function in newborn infants with tachypnea of unknown cause. Pediatr Res. 1987;22(5):581.
44. Shoulders-Odom B. Using an algorithm to interpret arterial blood gases. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2000;19(1):36.
200 UNIT TWO Support of the Neonate
https://t.me/medicina_free
45. Simmons MA, Adcock EW, Bard H, et al. Hypernatremia and intracranial hemorrhage in neonates. N Engl J Med. 1974;291(1):6.
46. Sirker AA, Rhodes A, Grounds RM, et al. Acid-base physiology: the “traditional” and the “modern” approaches. Anaesthesia. 2002;57(4):348.
47. Sivieri EM, Bhutani VK. Pulmonary mechanics. In: Sinha SK, Donn SM, eds. Manual of Neonatal Respiratory Care. Armonk, NY: Mosby; 2000.
48. Story DA, Morimatsu H, Bellomo R. Strong ions, weak acids and base excess: a simplified Fencl-Stewart approach to clinical acid-base disorders. Br J Anaesthesiol. 2004;92(1):54.
49. Swenson ER. Metabolic acidosis. Respir Care. 2001;46(4):342.
50. Sykes GS, Molloy PM. Effect of delays in collection or analysis on the results of umbilical cord blood measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984;91(10):989.
51. Valero J, Deasntes D, Perales-Puchalt A, et al. Effect of delayed umbilical cord clamping on blood gas analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;16(1):21.
52. Van Gosen L. Organic acidemias: a methylmalonic and propi­onic focus. J Pediatr Nurs. 2008;23(3):225.
53. Whittier WL, Rutecki GW. Primer on clinical acid-base prob­lem solving. Dis Mon. 2004;50(3):122.
54. Wilson WC. Clinical approach to acid-base analysis: importance of the anion gap. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2001;19(4):907.
55. Wiswell TE, Srinivasan P, Roberton NRC. Aspiration syn­dromes. In: Greenough A, Milner AD, eds. Neonatal Respiratory Disorders. London: Arnold; 2003.
56. Woodrow P. Arterial blood gas analysis. Nurs Stand. 2004;18(21):45.
57. Yeh P, Emary K, Impey L. The relationship between umbilical cord arterial pH and serious adverse neonatal outcome: analysis of 51,519 consecutive validated samples. BJOG. 2012;119(7):824.
58. Yeomans ER, Hauth JC, Gilstrap 3rd LC, Strickland DM. Umbilical cord pH, PCO2, and bicarbonate following uncomplicated term vaginal deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151(6):798.
DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING IN
https://t.me/medicina_free
9
maging is an important part of the diagnosis and treatment of medical problems in new-
I
borns. The ability to noninvasively screen for and diagnose disease, monitor the effects of therapy, and help define prognosis has made imaging an essential part of neonatal care. With
refinements in diagnostic equipment and capabili­ties, the role of imaging has expanded significantly in recent years. There are many ways to assess any problem, and the vast potential of the new imaging modalities makes appropriate imaging a constant challenge (Table 9.1). New modalities have been introduced, and advancement in computer technol­ogy has added sophistication to established modal­ities. Nearly 60% of diagnostic imaging involves modalities that were not even available 30 years ago.
Many excellent reference books and text­books on neonatal imaging address specific questions.* This chapter reviews the various imaging modalities available for diagnosis and intervention. A short summary of each imaging modality includes background information and the risks and benefits of each. For clarity, this thumbnail description of each modality provides a concise, tailored discussion of the physics of image acquisition. Each section addresses the most common usage of the modality in neonates, followed by a focused discussion of one or two aspects of image interpretation.
Because there is often more than one appropriate way to evaluate any given problem, it is essential to understand the inherent advantages and limitations of each modality to decide which might be most effective. Understanding some of the challenges associated with diagnostic imaging can lay the
* References 3, 4, 8, 9, 22, 24, 27, 29–32.
THE NEONATE
JASON P. WEINMAN, BRIDGET M. BRONSERT, AND JOHN D. STRAIN
foundation for a focused problem-solving approach with appropriate collaboration between clinicians and radiology that will result in the best care for the patient.
RADIOGRAPHY
Background
The 1896 introduction of the roentgenogram was
met with great enthusiasm, and x-ray examination quickly became an indispensable clinical diagnostic tool throughout the world. Until 35 years ago, the field of radiology was based almost exclusively on the use of the x-ray.
A beam of ionizing radiation from a source (x-ray tube) passes through the patient, and various structures within the body interact to attenuate the x-ray before it is received on the other side. The x-rays pass through the patient and
then expose a film, just as light exposes a negative in black-and-white film photography. The film is developed, and the resultant image (radiograph) is a map that corresponds to the transmitted x-ray (that portion of the x-ray not attenuated by absorption or scattered as it passes through the patient). Somewhat analogous to the shadows that result from objects in the sun, the images from x-ray are a shadow of the object being radiographed.
Bone attenuates a greater amount of the x-ray (or allows the penetration of fewer x-rays) than lung tissue does, resulting in a film on which the rib is white and the lung is black. In
some ways, this can be compared with the different shadows cast by the trunk of a tree and by its leaves. With radiography, the spatial resolution is exquisite,
BLUE type highlights content that is particularly applicable to clinical settings.
201
TABLE
https://t.me/medicina_free
9.1
UNIT TWO Support of the Neonate202
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF IMAGING MODALITIES
IMAGING MODALITY
X-ray Very low Excellent Fair Low Never Very fast acquisition
Fluoroscopy Low Excellent Fair Moderate Never Evaluates motion in real
Ultrasonography None Good Fair Moderate Never Portable; evaluates motion
Computed tomography
Magnetic reso­nance imaging
Nuclear medicine Very low Poor Excellent Moderate to high Sometimes Physiologic imaging
IONIZING RADIATION
Low Good Good Moderate to high Sometimes Cross-sectional imaging
None Good Excellent High Frequent Multiplanar (i.e., in multiple
SPATIAL RESOLUTION
CONTRAST RESOLUTION
COST SEDATION MISCELLANEOUS
eliminates motion
time
real-time
planes) imaging, flowing blood without contrast
although the contrast resolution is lacking. One can capture 10 to 20 line pairs per millimeter with film radiography, although only five different densities
TABLE
9.2
POSITION OF LINES AND TUBES
can be routinely distinguished: air, fat, water (which includes all solid viscera—liver, spleen, kidney, pancreas, and heart), bone, and metal.
More recent developments in x-ray technol­ogy include computed radiography (CR) and digital radiography (DR). Although the physics of x-ray generation is essentially the same, the receiver has changed. With CR, a phosphores­cent plate replaces film, and the latent image is captured digitally. With DR, the image is directly captured by a digital detector. The introduction of these products was driven by the desire to cap­ture, archive, distribute, and display digital images. Almost all medical imaging is now digital, and a picture archiving and communication system (PACS)
LINE/TUBE POSITION
Endotracheal tube 1 cm above the level of the carina Umbilical artery catheter Descending aorta between T8 and T10 Umbilical venous catheter Junction inferior vena cava and right
atrium
Central line Junction superior vena cava and right
atrium
PICC line Junction superior vena cava and right
atrium
Nasogastric tube Antrum of the stomach
PICC, Peripherally inserted central catheter; T8 and T10, thoracic vertebrae 8 and 10.
has become an essential component of any imag­ing department.
suboptimal line or tube placement, allowing for repositioning and helping to eliminate compli-
Clinical Utility in the Neonatal Intensive Care Setting
cations (Table 9.2). Chest radiographs are most commonly used to evaluate the heart and lungs. Abdominal imaging allows a limited assessment
Radiography is the simplest and most reliable way to define tube and line position. Radiopaque markers are incorporated into most of these devices. From
peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) to endotracheal, thoracostomy, and feeding tubes, a simple radiograph can quickly identify
of the solid viscera (the liver, spleen, and kid­neys), as well as the bowel gas pattern, which is useful in evaluating a neonate with a feeding intolerance (Fig. 9.1). The bones of the trunk and extremities are easily assessed with plain-film radiology.
CHAPTER 9 Diagnostic Imaging in the Neonate
https://t.me/medicina_free
203
Focused Discussion: Chest Radiographs
The most common use of x-ray imaging in the neonatal unit is for evaluation of the chest to help define abnormalities that might contrib­ute to respiratory distress. Respiratory distress
in newborns can be divided into three categories: conditions that are managed medically, those that are managed surgically, and iatrogenic respiratory distress.
MEDICALLY MANAGED RESPIRATORY DISTRESS
Table 9.3 summarizes plain-film diagnosis of
respiratory distress in newborns. The use of this
approach takes advantage of the fact that only a limited number of changes can be identified radiographically, and a constellation of findings can define a specific group of etiologic factors. A sys-
tematic analysis of these various characteristics helps determine a specific group that has a fairly limited differential diagnosis (Box 9.1).
FIGURE 9.1 Frontal chest and abdomen show gaseous distention of the
stomach (open arrow) and duodenal bulb (curved arrow), the classic double bubble seen in duodenal atresia. Incidental note is made of 13 pairs of ribs in this patient with Down syndrome.
TABLE
9.3
C Congenital
H Hyaline
I Immature
M Meconium
P Neonatal
PLAIN-FILM DIAGNOSIS OF MEDICALLY MANAGED CAUSES OF RESPIRATORY DISTRESS IN THE NEWBORN (CHIMP DIFFERENTIAL)
GESTATIONAL AGE
heart disease
<36 weeks Decreased Diffuse granu­membrane disease*
<26 weeks Normal Decreased Diffuse lung
≥39 weeks Normal Increased Streaky and aspiration
pneumonia
HEART SIZE LUNG
VOLUME
Increased Normal or
increased
Normal or increased
SURGICALLY MANAGED RESPIRATORY DISTRESS
Respiratory conditions that are managed surgi­cally can be subdivided into three groups: (1)
NATURE OF INFILTRATE
Increased pulmo­nary vascularity or edema
larity with air bronchograms
granularity
patchy Either diffuse or
focal
PROGRESSION ANCILLARY
FINDINGS
Stable or progressive
Progressive over first 24 hours
Progressive Absent thymus from
Stable Air leak (i.e.,
Abnormal situs, aortic discordance
No pleural effusions or body wall edema
stress
pneumothorax) Pleural effusions and
body wall edema
*Surfactant deficiency disease.
UNIT TWO Support of the Neonate204
https://t.me/medicina_free
BOX
9.1
Congenital heart disease
Hyaline membrane disease*
Immature lung
Meconium aspiration
Pneumonia
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia represents the chronic lung disease that
* The use of exogenous surfactant modifies the picture of hyaline membrane disease (idiopathic respiratory distress syndrome [IRDS]) significantly. The irregular distribution after endotracheal administration causes a much less uniform infiltrate, and the patchy pattern that results has a look similar to that in meconium aspiration, which might be seen in a term or postterm infant.
CHIMP DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS MODEL
Transient tachypnea of the newborn (resolves over first 24 hours) Extracardiac shunts
Diffuse atelectasis
Represents anectasis rather than atelectasis
Amniotic fluid aspiration
Diffuse
Birth asphyxia
Focal
Pulmonary hemorrhage
may result from any of the causes of respiratory distress.
those associated with aspiration, such as cleft
palate, laryngeal cleft, or tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF); (2) those that compromise functional
lung volume, including congenital diaphragmatic
hernia (CDH), congenital lobar emphysema (Fig.
9.2), pulmonary sequestration, and congenital pul-
monary airway malformation (CPAM); and (3)
those associated with tracheal or bronchial narrowing, such as a double aortic arch and other
vascular rings and slings, congenital tracheal stenosis, and bronchogenic cyst (Box 9.2).
FIGURE 9.2 Frontal view of the chest shows a hyperaerated lucent left
upper lobe (arrows) associated with mediastinal shift from left to right and is characteristic of congenital lobar emphysema.
BOX
9.2
1. Associated with aspiration a. Cleft palate b. Laryngeal cleft c. Tracheoesophageal fistula
2. Compromised functional lung volume involvement a. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia b. Congenital lobar emphysema c. Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation
3. Cause tracheal or bronchial narrowing a. Double aortic arch b. Tracheal stenosis c. Bronchogenic cyst
SURGICALLY MANAGED RESPIRATORY DISTRESS
IATROGENIC RESPIRATORY DISTRESS
Most iatrogenic respiratory distress results from either a misplaced catheter or tube or from barotrauma. An endotracheal tube (ETT) can be
placed too deep and will preferentially ventilate only a single lung. An ETT may even be placed inadvertently into the esophagus, resulting in inad­equate ventilation (Fig. 9.3), which is further com- promised by distention of the esophagus and small bowel, limiting lung expansion.
Air leaks are often the result of barotrauma
(Fig. 9.4). Although barotrauma occurs much less
frequently because of the availability of exogenous surfactant, high-frequency ventilation, and nitric oxide therapy, air leaks continue to be a problem that causes significant concern. Appropriate ventilation management requires timely and accurate diagnosis.
One goal in the review of a chest x-ray is to define the location of any extrapulmonary gas. Abnormal extrapulmonary gas can include any one or a combination of the following: pulmo­nary interstitial emphysema, subcutaneous em­physema, pneumomediastinum, pneumothorax,
FIGURE 9.3 Frontal chest film. Although the endotracheal tube projects over
https://t.me/medicina_free
the midline mediastinum near the thoracic inlet, the dilated esophagus (arrow­heads) and distended stomach (arrow) associated with right upper lobe and left
lower lobe atelectasis suggested esophageal intubation, which was diagnosed in this patient.
CHAPTER 9 Diagnostic Imaging in the Neonate
205
pneumopericardium, pneumocardia, and portal venous gas.
Focused Discussion: Skeletal Dysplasia
Skeletal dysplasias are a group of bone and cartilage disorders that, although rare individually, overall occur in approximately 1 in 5000 births. Today over 450 individual skeletal dysplasias are known and classified by their clinical, radiographic, and genetic findings. The accurate identification and classifica­tion of a patient with skeletal dysplasia can have important implications for the patient because some prove fatal in early life. In patients for whom a
complex skeletal dysplasia is suspected, a skele­tal survey consisting of anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views of the skull, AP and lateral views of the spine, and AP views of the pelvis and all extremities (with separate AP views of the hands and feet) should be obtained.
The first step in assessing the radiographs
in a patient with suspected skeletal dysplasia
21
A
FIGURE 9.4 A, Frontal chest film. Surfactant deficiency disease (hyaline membrane disease) in this patient is defined by the diffuse
symmetric granular infiltrates with low lung volumes. This patient required intubation, and the endotracheal tube tip projects in satisfactory position. B, Follow-up examination in the same patient demonstrates linear lucencies within the right lung resulting from pulmonary interstitial emphysema. A tension pneumothorax (arrowheads) is identified on the right with mild mediastinal shift from right to left. The lack of atelec­tasis on the right is the result of the extremely poor lung compliance that accompanies pulmonary interstitial emphysema. The endotracheal tube tip projects in a satisfactory position, but the nasogastric tube is in the midesophagus.
B
UNIT TWO Support of the Neonate206
https://t.me/medicina_free
is to look for disproportion. A disproportionate
appearance of the chest, such as a narrowed, elon­gated chest, can be an important diagnostic sign of dysplasia. Other signs include flattening of the vertebral bodies (platyspondyly), with short-trunk disproportion, and shortening of the extremities, such as rhizomelia (root or proximal limb shorten­ing), mesomelia (middle limb), or acromelia (distal limb). The next step is to evaluate epiphyseal,
metaphyseal, and diaphyseal ossification. Growth
of long bones occurs at the ends, where the mid­shaft (diaphysis) is contiguous with the distal shaft (metaphysis) and separated by a radiolucent carti­laginous plate (epiphyseal cartilage or physis) from the distal end (epiphysis). Ossification centers of the dis­tal femur, proximal tibia, calcaneus, and cuboid are often present at birth. With these findings in mind, the patient can often be classified into a group of skeletal dysplasias. With the help of reference books on skeletal dysplasias, such as Taybi and Lachman’s
Radiology of Syndromes, Metabolic Disorders and Skeletal Dysplasias,20 specific findings can lead to a diagnosis.
Achondroplasia is a relatively common dysplasia,
with 2.8 cases per 100,000 births. Achondroplasia
is a disproportionate rhizomelic short-limbed skeletal dwarfism (i.e., the proximal segment
[humerus] is shorter than the middle [radius and ulna] and distal [wrist and hand] segments). Patients with achondroplasia also have a disproportionately large head, with a decreased size of the skull base and narrow foramen magnum. The lower lum­bar spine demonstrates narrowing of the distance between the pedicles, which normally widen at the lower lumbar spine, and kyphosis (posterior angu­lation) at the thoracolumbar junction. Infants often suffer from respiratory difficulties due to adenoidal hypertrophy, narrow nasal passages, and a small tho­rax. Narrowing of the foramen magnum and cervi­comedullary compression can lead to hydrocephalus and neurologic complications.
Thanatophoric dysplasia is also a disproportionate rhizomelic short-limbed dwarfism. Although the radiographic findings are qualitatively similar to achondroplasia, the severity of the manifestations helps differentiate the two. Classic findings in new­borns with thanatophoric dysplasia include very short, bowed femurs with metaphyseal flaring (tele­phone receiver femurs); a narrow thorax; a large head with small facial bones; and flattened vertebral bodies with notched endplates. Thanatophoric dysplasia is frequently suggested on prenatal ultrasonography by
FIGURE 9.5 Anteroposterior film of the chest and abdomen of a patient with
asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy (Jeune syndrome) demonstrates short broad ribs with a narrow thorax as well as shortened iliac wings with bony spurs. Also note the malpositioned umbilical venous catheter with its tip in the upper right atrium (arrow) and umbilical arterial catheter (arrowhead).
shortened femurs and a narrow chest. This dysplasia has important implications in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) because infants will die within the first few days of life without respiratory support.
In asphyxiating thoracic dysplasia (Jeune syndrome), presenting signs include a long, narrow thorax with short horizontal ribs and respiratory difficulties in infancy (Fig. 9.5). Shortening of the extremities, including the hands and feet, with occasional polydac­tyly (extra digits), also occurs and can present at birth or later in life. In the pelvis, the iliac wings are shortened in the craniocaudal direction, with bony spurs project­ing from the acetabula. Complications of asphyxiating thoracic dysplasia in the neonate center on respiratory distress due to reduced lung volumes/small chest size. Later in life, respiratory infections become a problem, and progressive renal disease leading to renal failure may occur. Patients may also develop hepatic fibrosis, pancreatic fibrosis, and retinal degeneration.
FLUOROSCOPY
Background
Fluoroscopy employs an x-ray tube similar to that used for plain-film radiography. The x-ray is
generated in the same manner as in plain radiogra-
https://t.me/medicina_free
phy, but it is received in most cases by a device that is similar to a TV camera or VCR. Fluoroscopy
allows real-time evaluation of a patient and can be performed with or without contrast mate­rial. The spatial resolution in fluoroscopy is not as
good as that in plain-film radiography, but it is still excellent. The contrast resolution is about the same: air, fat, water, bone, and contrast are the primary densities that can be separated. Contrast media can be given orally or per rectum, instilled into the urinary bladder, or given intravenously. The contrast attenuates the radiation beam to a variable extent related to physical properties and thickness of the attenuator. Most contrast agents are compounds that use either inert barium or iodine as the attenuator of the radiation beam. The most important char-
acteristic of fluoroscopic imaging is the ability to evaluate motion in real time. This is essential in the evaluation of swallowing function, gas­trointestinal (GI) peristalsis, and diaphragmatic motion.
Clinical Utility in the Neonatal Intensive Care Setting
CHAPTER 9 Diagnostic Imaging in the Neonate
FIGURE 9.6 A lateral film from the early filling phase of a contrast enema
demonstrates spasm of the distal rectal segment (short arrow) with a transition zone to dilated colon (long arrow). These findings are characteristic of colonic Hirschsprung disease.
207
The most common fluoroscopic examinations requested for neonates include the upper GI (UGI) series, contrast enema, and voiding cys­tourethrography. The UGI series (and modifica-
tions of it) is useful in the evaluation of swallowing, feeding intolerance, vomiting, and abdominal dis­tention with possible bowel obstruction.
A contrast enema should be the initial diag-
nostic study of choice when low bowel obstruc­tion is suggested clinically or on radiographs. A
contrast enema can be diagnostic in many cases of low bowel obstruction, including distal small bowel atresia, meconium ileus, and small left colon syn­drome. Findings suggestive of Hirschsprung disease can lead to further evaluation with punch biopsy and play an important role in surgical planning (Fig. 9.6).
In addition to a diagnostic role, a contrast enema can be therapeutic in small left colon syndrome and meconium ileus.
A voiding cystourethrogram is used to evaluate
the urinary bladder and the urethra and to look for vesicoureteral reflux (Fig. 9.7), which is associ-
ated with urinary tract infection. Vesicoureteral reflux is a common cause of hydronephrosis, which is now frequently identified during prenatal ultrasonography.
FIGURE 9.7 Frontal view from a voiding cystourethrogram demonstrates
grade II vesicoureteral reflux on the left (arrow).
UNIT TWO Support of the Neonate208
https://t.me/medicina_free
Ureteroceles, periureteral diverticula, and posterior urethral valves all can be associated with hydrone­phrosis in the neonatal period and demonstrated with cystourethrography.
Air functions as a useful contrast agent, and the nasal and oral airway, as well as the trachea and proximal bronchus, can easily be evaluated fluoroscopically. Because the diaphragm is imme-
diately adjacent to aerated lungs, diaphragmatic motion and its relationship to inspiratory effort help in the evaluation of phrenic nerve injury and dia­phragmatic paralysis. Eventration of the diaphragm also can be evaluated fluoroscopically, but at times, it can be indistinguishable from diaphragmatic hernia.
Focused Discussion: Upper Gastrointestinal Series
Indications for performing a UGI fluoroscopic study include swallowing dysfunction, vomiting, choking, and apnea. An appropriately performed
UGI series offers a systematic approach to the upper GI tract. Starting with the patient in a left-side-down recumbent position, deglutition, transport, aspiration, and laryngeal penetration all can be grossly assessed, with more detailed assessment reserved for a mod­ified barium swallow using contrast material with varying thicknesses. The right-side-down position better separates the esophagus and the tracheal air column. However, if this position is used initially and the evaluation of the esophagus is prolonged, the stomach may empty, filling the proximal small bowel and obscuring the location of the ligament of Treitz.
The left-side-down position allows evaluation of swallowing and the esophagus without concern that the stomach may empty prematurely.
Esophageal atresia usually is diagnosed clini-
cally; plain-film observation of intraluminal bowel
gas defines the most common form, which is asso­ciated with a distal tracheoesophageal fistula. Often,
an enteric tube that coils in the proximal esoph­ageal pouch is the initial radiographic finding in patients with tracheoesophageal fistula. The
benefit of a proximal pouch study in esophageal atresia is controversial. There is a small incidence of fistula from the proximal pouch to the trachea; this incidence is independent of the presence or absence of a distal fistula. If the surgical approach to esophageal atresia repair includes direct visualization of the proximal pouch (esophagoscopy), the pouch contrast study is superfluous. If, on the other hand,
esophagoscopy is not routinely performed, there is some value in evaluating the proximal pouch before surgery. In the absence of esophageal atresia, the location of the fistula (H type) is at the thoracic inlet. This is higher than the fistula that occurs at the level of the carina in the most common form of esophageal atresia.
The contour and caliber of the esophagus are evaluated next. Impressions on the posterior esophagus are suggestive of vascular rings and are correlated with side of the aortic arch to deter­mine if further work-up for vascular ring is needed. Impressions on the anterior esophagus can be related to pulmonary artery slings. Esophageal con­tour, mucosal detail, and peristalsis are assessed. The
configuration of the gastroesophageal junction can indicate gastroesophageal reflux, and rare hiatal hernias can be diagnosed.
Gastric emptying is evaluated, and gastric
peristalsis is examined. Because the rotation and
fixation of the bowel have important consequences in the newborn period, definition of the duode­nal bulb, C-loop, and position of the ligament of Treitz is a critical part of a complete examination. Both the posteroanterior (PA) and lateral views are essential in localizing the ligament of Treitz. For proximal bowel rotation and fixation to be consid­ered normal, the duodenal-jejunal junction (fixated by the ligament of Treitz) must be retroperitoneal (and therefore posterior), to the left of the spine, and at the level of the retroperitoneal portion of the second portion of the duodenum (just distal to the duodenal bulb).
The rotation of the proximal bowel may be inde­pendent of the rotation of the hindgut. Therefore,
if the clinical question is malrotation and possi­ble volvulus, the UGI series is the examination of choice. The caliber, contour, and fold pattern
of the proximal bowel are evaluated, and the tran­sit time is observed. This simple, systematic, yet comprehensive approach to the UGI series yields a tremendous amount of information.
ULTRASONOGRAPHY
Background
One of the most prominent mass-media introduc­tions of ultrasound (US) technology came when Dr. Robert Ballard located the wreckage of the Titanic