Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_37_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
17 Мб
Скачать
☆
a significant source of aluminum toxicity.56 Thirty
https://t.me/medicina_free
samples of TPN in the same hospital showed that although the FDA advises the maximum exposure to aluminum be under 5 mcg/kg/day, aluminum contamination in TPN for infants younger than 30 days of age was three times higher than the FDA advisory.56 Clinicians should attempt to reduce
aluminum intake and should monitor levels for infants at highest risk.
6
Table 16.3 outlines a suggested composition
for a TPN solution (guideline only). Even in the most knowledgeable hands, accurate calculation and ordering of parenteral nutrition for preterm or ill infants is a complex task. Online TPN ordering
programs are available in many units to assist the clinician with this task. Use of such pro­grams has been shown to decrease order entry errors and are cost effective.
76,80
The Case Study illustrates considerations in writing orders for TPN solutions.
Preparing the Solution
Solutions should be prepared in the hospital pharmacy under a laminar flow hood in a work area isolated from traffic and contaminated supplies. There should be quality control checks to
monitor for sterility breaks in equipment, personnel, environment, and solutions.
Because many additives potentially can be insoluble in combination, a mixing sequence should be established that separates the most incompatible ingredients. Storage increases the risk for microbial contamination; therefore TPN
solutions should be prepared on the day they are needed.82 However, to be able to provide an amino acid infusion to preterm infants immediately after admission, some units maintain a “stock” amino acid solution (10% dextrose with 2 to 3 g of amino acids per 100 mL).
119
Administering the Total Parenteral
Nutrition Solution
CHAPTER 16 Total Parenteral Nutrition
TABLE
16.3
COMPONENT DAILY AMOUNT
SUGGESTED COMPOSITION FOR DAILY INTRAVENOUS NUTRITION REGIMEN
Calories
Dextrose 3.4 kcal/g 10–15 g/kg Lipids 2.0 kcal/mL (20%) solution 1–3 g/kg Protein (6.25 g protein = 1 g N2) 3.5–4 g/kg
Electrolytes
Sodium 3 mEq/kg Potassium 2–3 mEq/kg Chloride Acetate 3 mEq/kg Phosphate 2 mM/kg Calcium 3 mEq/kg Magnesium 0.3 mEq (range 0.25–0.5
3–4 mEq/kg
mEq/kg) or 20 mg/kg (range 10–40 mg/kg) of elemental magnesium
Vitamins
MVI-Ped <1 kg 1.5 mL/day 1–3 kg 3.25 mL/day >3 kg 5 mL/day
Trace Elements
Zinc (zinc sulfate) <3 kg 400 mcg/kg/day ≥3 kg 250 mcg/kg/day (Max of
4 mg/day) Copper (cupric sulfate) 20 mcg/kg Manganese sulfate 5 mcg/kg Chromium chloride 0.2 mcg/kg Selenium 2 mcg/kg
469
Proper administration of the TPN solution is as important as its preparation in preventing complications. The label on the solution always should be checked to correctly identify the patient, using at least two identifiers, and to verify current formulation order.
Standardized procedures must be established to avoid infectious complications from solution con­tamination. Solutions on the nursing units may
be returned to the pharmacy for additives before hanging, but no additives should be placed in the solution once it is hanging. The bag or bottle
UNIT THREE Metabolic and Nutritional Care of the Neonate470
12.5g/dl 140ml/kg=17.5g glucose/kg
17.5g glucose/kg 3.4kcal/g glucose=60kcal/kg
()
+ +
(3 mM PO4/4mEqNa )=(3 mEq Na )
/kg
https://t.me/medicina_free
CASE STUDY
The following case example illustrates considerations in writing orders for total parenteral nutrition (TPN).
History
A male infant born at 26 weeks of gestation at 900 g is now 10 days old and unable to be fed because he has developed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Because there will be a prolonged delay in enteral alimentation, a central vein catheter is placed for TPN. He is currently receiving D10W at 140 mL/kg with maintenance electrolytes. His current weight is 850 g. Serum electrolytes and blood glucose are normal. He is receiving continuous infusion pain medications and vasopressors that are equal to 21 mL/kg/ day of fluid. The approach to calculating TPN requirements is as follows.
Caloric Requirement
Because the patient has already had a significant postpartum period without adequate nutrition, achieving caloric intake necessary for growth is a very important part of his care. The infant will probably require 100 kcal/kg or more for tissue repair and growth. We will begin with approximately 60 to 70 kcal/kg (the birth weight is used until weight gain is established) and advance the intake daily to reach this level.
Carbohydrate
Initially, a dextrose load just above what has been previously tolerated should be used. Thus the patient may receive D mL/kg/day; the volume could vary depending on the infant’s fluid require­ments. When TPN is ordered, carbohydrate amount should be ordered as glu­cose infusion rate (GIR) rather than percent dextrose to minimize errors. This represents:
W at approximately 140
12.5
85
Electrolytes
The patient should receive maintenance sodium ion (approximately 3 mEq/ kg) and potassium ion (2 to 3 mEq/kg) unless there are excessive renal or gastrointestinal losses.
Anions
Balancing anions is the next consideration. The 3 g/kg of amino acids, if given as TrophAmine, adds approximately 3 mEq/kg of acetate to the solution (1 mEq acetate/1 g amino acids). If 3 mEq/kg of potassium is provided as potassium chloride, the solution has balanced anions. Giving 3 mEq/kg of sodium as sodium phosphate provides approximately 2.2 mM/kg of elemental phosphorus:
=2.25 mM PO
4
Minerals, Vitamins, and Trace Elements
Calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, vitamins, and trace elements should be ordered at this point. Calcium initially should be started at 2 to 3 mEq/kg/ day but may be increased as tolerated with growth to 4 to 5 mEq/kg/day.
Use of an online TPN ordering program may assist the clinician by auto-
mating many of these calculations.
76
TPN Orders
Thus the TPN orders would be written for this patient as follows:
Total Fluids = 140 mL/kg/day Nutritional Volume = 140 mL/kg/day Fat Emulsion Order: 1 g/kg/day to run at 0.19 mL/hr for 24 hours TPN Order: 135 mL/kg/day = 5.1 mL/hr
Fat
Lipid emulsion should be added to increase the caloric intake, starting with 1 g/kg/day.
5mL/kg20% lipid emulsion 1.0g
2kcal / mL=10kcal/kg/day
Thus the total nonnitrogen calories on the first day of TPN is 70 (60 + 10).
Protein
Provision of protein nutrition is critical to this preterm infant for growth and to repair damaged tissues. The initial amino acid replacement is 2.5 to 3 g/kg/day.
TPN Order Ordered Components
Glucose infusion rate (GIR)
Amino acids 3 gm/kg/day Cysteine 40 mg/gram of amino acids Potassium chloride 2.8 mEq/kg/day (2.8 mEq/kg/day K+; 2.8
Sodium phosphate 2.8 mmol/kg/day (3.7 mEq/kg/day Na+; 2.8
Calcium gluconate 2.8 mEq/kg/day Magnesium sulfate 0.3 mEq/kg/day Multivitamin 1.5 mL/day Zinc 400 mcg/kg/day Copper 20 mcg/kg/day Manganese 5 mcg/kg/day (some would not add manganese
4 mg/kg/min
mEq/kg/day Cl−)
mmol/kg/day phosphate)
due to cross contamination of other TPN products)
CASE STUDY
https://t.me/medicina_free
CHAPTER 16 Total Parenteral Nutrition
471
TPN Order Ordered Components
Chromium 0.2 mcg/kg/day (some would not add
manganese due to cross contamination of other TPN products)
Selenium 2 mcg/kg/day
of TPN solution should be changed every 24 hours, and the tubing administration sets should be changed no more frequently than every 72 to 96 hours. Lipid emulsions and tubing should be changed every 12 to 24 hours.
13,15,53,72,81,85
Tubing for lipid administration should include a 1.2 micron filter. Polyvinyl chloride tub­ing and IV bags containing phthalates should be avoided to reduce potential toxicity from plasticizers.
48,120
Exposure of TPN to light generates perox­ides, which induce vasoconstriction and oxi­dant stress associated with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Photoprotection of bags, syringes, and tubing used to deliver TPN and lipids may reduce the oxidant effect on the lungs and mes­enteric blood flow. Light shielding also appears to diminish oxidative stress and alterations of lipid metabolism, resulting in lower levels of triglyceride and better substrate delivery. Amber-colored tubing may be used for this purpose.
32,52,66,67
Changes in TPN infusion rates result in changes in glucose delivery to the newborn and may lead to hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia if the glucose homeostatic mechanisms do not adjust fast enough.
Reactive hypoglycemia may occur if the glucose load is abruptly reduced or discontinued, such as
from loss of vascular access or rapid decrease in dex­trose concentration or infusion rate.10 Parenteral
nutrition solutions must infuse at a constant rate via an infusion pump. Infusion rates should not be rapidly increased or decreased. If the paren­teral nutrition infusion is suddenly discontin­ued because of a clotted catheter or accidental removal, an appropriate solution with dextrose should be infused via a peripheral vein and blood glucose should be monitored closely.
Progression
On subsequent days, the dextrose concentration and lipids would be advanced slowly to increase the caloric intake to requirement as tolerated. The quantity of protein would also be increased to about 4 g/kg/day.
Use of parenteral nutrition may increase an infant’s risk for hyperglycemia during surgery. Because rapid fluid infusions may be necessary during operative procedures, the TPN solution should be discontinued and replaced with a physio­logic infusate during the perioperative period. After surgery, TPN should be as when the patient is eug­lycemic, with recent evidence of early postoperative protein tolerance and improved protein balance.
100
Tapering of the TPN solution occurs as the infant begins to tolerate enteral feedings. When the patient is taking approximately two thirds of the necessary calories enterally, the central line may be removed.
Administering Fat Solution
Rapid infusion of the fat emulsion may exceed its clearance rate from the body and accentuate complications; therefore fat emulsions should not be infused faster than 0.2 g/kg/hr.
erally are given through a Y-site connection to bypass the filter in the TPN line or may be given through a separate venous site. However, some hospitals use a combined dextrose, amino acid, and lipid solution known as three-in-one or total nutrient admixture
19,110
(TNA).
A 1.2 micron filter is used with
this solution to remove certain drug precipitates (Ca/PO4), air, and Candida species but is not effective in removing bacteria. The decision to use
TNA should be approached with caution in infants. Lipid emulsions increase the pH of the TPN solution, limiting the amount of calcium and phosphorus that can be delivered because of the risk for precipitation. Precipitates are particularly difficult to detect in TNA, which is a milky solution. High concentra­tion of calcium and low pH of the solution also can disrupt TNA, causing it to “crack” and leading to
7,96
Lipids gen-
UNIT THREE Metabolic and Nutritional Care of the Neonate472
S
(Glucose/18)
+
https://t.me/medicina_free
separation of oil from the rest of the solution. One must store the admixture emulsion at an ambient temperature below 28° C to prevent coalescence.
74
When administering lipids to ill infants receiv­ing other infusions, care must be taken to ensure that medications are compatible with lipids or medications must be provided by a sep­arate IV route to prevent precipitation. It should also be noted that IV compatibility is different between lipid products, with mixed oil based lipid emulsions having limited data regarding compatibility with other medications or fluids.
COMPLICATIONS
Metabolic Complications
GLUCOSE METABOLISM
Hyperglycemia may occur with increased carbo­hydrate load, especially in ELBW
138
infants who may have inadequate endogenous insulin production or decreased sensitivity to insulin. Hyperglycemia is
arbitrarily defined as a blood glucose concentration greater than 125 mg/dL (6.9 mmol/L) or a plasma or serum blood glucose concentration greater than 150 mg/dL (8.3 mmol/L).
59,103
Elevated blood sugar may lead to hyperosmolality and osmotic diure­sis, resulting in dehydration. Manifestations include polyuria, glucosuria, and excessive weight loss. Serum sodium is not a reliable measure of serum osmolality if there is hyperglycemia. Direct measurement or estimate by use of the following formula is necessary:
erum osmolality = (1.86) Na + (BUN/2.8) +
Transient glucose intolerance may be seen
with stress. If hyperglycemia occurs without appar-
ent change in glucose infusion, the possibility of sepsis, pain, hypoxemia, intraventricular hemorrhage (espe­cially if the infant is less than 34 weeks’ gestation), glu­cocorticoid administration, or inadvertent increase in carbohydrate administration (mistake in preparation or rate of infusion) should be considered. Glucose
intolerance also may be accentuated during infu­sions of lipid emulsion, especially in an ELBW infant. Discontinuation of the lipid infusion without
alteration of the carbohydrate load will often elim­inate hyperglycemia in this situation. Some ELBW
infants remain hyperglycemic even on reduced car­bohydrate intakes. Controversy still remains over the use of a continuous insulin infusion to attain adequate caloric intake. A recent Cochrane review of neonatal hyperglycemia and insulin treatment showed no improvement in outcomes with continuous insulin infusion compared with reduced glucose infusion rates.23 Treatment with insulin varies, but the
usual infant dose is 0.05 to 0.1 unit/kg/hour and should be reserved for severe hyperglycemia,
with clinical symptoms and resistance to other med­ical management changes.6 Routine use of insulin
to promote growth in the preterm infant is not advised because of side effects.
14
Hypoglycemia may result from an abrupt interruption of glucose infusion or excessive exogenous insulin administration. Manifestations of hypoglycemia include apnea, lethargy, jit­teriness, and seizures. If these signs occur immediately after an interruption of the TPN infusion, an IV glucose infusion must be initi­ated at once, followed by close monitoring of the blood glucose to allow appropriate glucose administration. The glucose concentration of the infusate may usually be safely decreased by a glucose infusion rate (GIR) of 2 mg/kg/min every 12 hours. Blood glucose values should be monitored hourly until stable after each change.
AMINO ACID METABOLISM
Hyperammonemia may be seen in preterm infants given excessive protein loads. Hyperammonemia
will occur also in an infant with a congeni­tal metabolic disturbance, such as a urea cycle defect, when challenged with an amino acid load.
Hyperammonemia may manifest as somnolence, lethargy, seizures, and coma. Biochemical screen-
ing is necessary to identify this complication before symptoms appear.
Azotemia may occur before hyperammonemia, but blood urea nitrogen (BUN) elevation in the first week of life of a preterm infant is usually associated with dehydration and has not been a reliable marker of protein excess.41 Therefore, although daily
monitoring is common in the first week, rising BUN is not an indication by itself to decrease the protein load.
CHOLESTASIS
Infants receiving TPN for more than 2 weeks frequently develop cholestatic jaundice (direct
CHAPTER 16 Total Parenteral Nutrition
https://t.me/medicina_free
473
bilirubin greater than 2 mg/dL).
34,99,117
The risk
appears to be greatest for the least mature infants and those receiving the longest period of TPN without enteral feeding. The cause
appears to be multifactorial, including lack of bile flow stimulation, delayed enteral feedings, malnutri­tion, or inflammation after localized or generalized infection.
135
More recently, IV fat emulsions, par­ticularly polyunsaturated fatty acid, are thought to contribute to cholestasis.
124
Serum amino transferases often are normal early in the clinical course. Serum albumin and prealbumin levels usually remain nor­mal. An abnormality in hepatic synthetic function or early rise in isoenzyme levels should lead the clinician to investigate other forms of liver disease.
The differential diagnosis of cholestatic jaun-
dice includes the following:
• Bacterial sepsis
• Congenital viral infection
• Postpartum acquisition of cytomegalovirus
• Neonatal hepatitis
• Bile duct obstruction, such as biliary atresia
or choledochal cyst
• Galactosemia
• Cystic fibrosis
• Alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency
Management of cholestatic jaundice should
include the following (when possible):
• Increase enteral feedings as tolerated and
decrease proportionately the parenteral nutrition
• Dose reduction of soybean-based IV fat
emulsion
129,132
• Reducing copper by 50% or eliminating copper
• Eliminating manganese from trace minerals in
TPN
• Protecting solutions from light by covering the
bag and IV tubing to reduce levels of light-in­duced toxic peroxides
• Trial of an agent that induces bile flow
33,66
30,111
• For infants with short bowel syndrome, con-
trolling intestinal bacterial overgrowth
64
• Considering an alternative type of fat
emulsion
LIPID METABOLISM
55,75
High-risk infants, including preterm and SGA low-birth-weight infants, may demon­strate intolerance to fat emulsion infusions. Hyperlipidemia may result, causing elevation of triglyceride, FFA, and lipoprotein levels. In
extreme cases, lactescence may be visible in serum
on a spun blood specimen (increased plasma tur­bidity). For screening, a triglyceride level should
be checked after initiation of therapy and then weekly and doses adjusted based on results.
Steroid therapy may elevate the triglyceride level.
104
Transient hyperglycemia may result from lipid infu­sion. This complication is usually dose related and rarely requires treatment.
43
Competitive displacement of bilirubin by FFA theoretically may increase the risk for kernicterus in preterm infants with hyperbilirubinemia. However, studies of preterm infants have indicated that lipid infusions may be used in jaundiced infants, but attention to the infusion rate and monitoring of FFAs are necessary.
96
Mechanical Complications
Pneumothorax, hemothorax, hydrothorax, air embolism, thromboembolism, catheter misplace­ment, cardiac perforation, and tamponade are all recognized complications of Broviac, subclavian, or jugular catheter insertions. Potential mechan­ical complications of percutaneous central lines include catheter occlusion, accidental dislodge­ment, erythematous tracking, phlebitis, throm­bosis, superior vena cava syndrome, catheter migration, perforation, and catheter entrapment or breakage.
pericardial effusion may be blood or chyle or may be a signal that the catheter has eroded into the pleural or pericardial space. The effusion may be the infusate.
Therefore chest x-ray examination is necessary to document correct catheter placement before a hypertonic solution is instilled, with the superior
vena cava the preferred catheter tip location.
The preceding complications may occur at any time while the catheter is present.
Documentation of catheter position should be repeated if there is any history of pulling or ten­sion on the catheter or any apparent change in its external position or change in the clinical condition associated with the preceding complications.
Any signs of catheter malfunction require troubleshooting and assessment for potential interventions to salvage the line. Some clini­cians will flush a partially occluded line with a thrombolytic agent, such as recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA). risk of this practice must be weighed against the benefits of maintaining the central line.
5,20,105,136
(See Box 7.1.) A pleural or
65,115
The
UNIT THREE Metabolic and Nutritional Care of the Neonate474
https://t.me/medicina_free
In most cases, if the catheter is a temporary line, it may be better to remove it and place a new line in another site.
Infectious Complications
Infections associated with the central line may occur from contamination of the solution, tubing connections, or hubs. Although organisms may con­taminate the solution during preparation, usually
colonization occurs with entry into the line or bag. Intermittent administration of medications, removal of blood samples through the line, or multiple tubing changes provide opportunity for organisms to contaminate the solution.
Rigid criteria for sterile preparation of the solu­tions are mandatory (see Preparing the Solution earlier in this chapter).
An in-line 0.22 mcm membrane filter, which is incorporated into the IV tubing for TPN administration, is capable of trapping bacteria and fungi (although not endotoxin) and should
help minimize the risk for septicemia from a con­taminated IV bag. In addition, filters lessen the risk for an air embolism. An in-line filter setup is avail­able that decreases the number of connections.
Nothing should be added to the TPN solu­tion after it leaves the pharmacy.
AVOIDING LINE COLONIZATION
Use of a dedicated central line team for place­ment, monitoring, maintenance, and trou­bleshooting has been found to improve line outcomes and reduce the incidence of neonatal catheter-related bloodstream infections. Line
insertion and maintenance bundles, which include hand hygiene, skin antisepsis, maximal barrier pre­cautions, strict adherence to proper hub care, and daily review of line necessity, are also important for avoiding line complications.
In addition, pay attention to the following to avoid line colonization
• When changing IV fluids, one should avoid
bleed-back into the catheter.
• Line setups should be designed to minimize
number of ports and connections.
• Generally, medications should not be given
into injection ports in the IV tubing but
should be given into a dedicated hepa-
rin-locked Y-site entry port instead. Stopcocks
are not recommended.
15,53
:
69
• The source of an infection is usually contam-
ination with an organism that has colonized the hub or surrounding skin. Scrupulous
attention to hand hygiene and disinfection of catheter tubing, hubs, ports, and connections by vigorous rubbing with 70% alcohol before tub­ing changes or entry are critical infection-pre­vention strategies.
15,68,69
Dressings are not routinely changed on
PICC lines. If the dressing becomes nonocclu­sive or moistened, the site should be cleaned according to hospital protocol and redressed with a sterile transparent dressing.53 This should
be performed using sterile gloves. The exposed catheter should be remeasured to ensure that it was not inadvertently moved during this process.
Dressings are changed routinely on Broviac, subclavian, jugular, and femoral catheters.
Dressing changes are recommended at least weekly or more frequently if drainage is noted or the dressing is no longer occlusive.
EVALUATING INFANTS FOR INFECTIOUS DISEASE COMPLICATIONS
Central line–associated bacteremia represents an important source of nosocomial infections in the intensive care nursery. The prevalence of
this complication varies by unit based on patient demographics including birth weight, gestational age, diagnoses (proportion of surgery and medicine), and care practices.
Bacteremia must be considered in a newborn
with a central line in place who exhibits signs of sepsis (e.g., temperature instability, lethargy, poor
skin perfusion, increased cardiopulmonary distress, apnea). Some neonatal infections may be treated successfully with the line in place. However, if the
infant remains systemically ill, even if the blood culture result is negative, the central line should be removed.
22
Altered immune function by lipid deposition in macrophages and the reticuloendothelial sys­tem must be considered in infants with sepsis.
Malassezia furfur is a lipophilic, opportunistic fungal organism that may cause sepsis in infants receiving long-term lipid infusions.
112
Although this organism is infrequently seen, it may contami­nate the line and appear as a white film. This organ­ism often will not grow in routine blood culture media. Specific culture techniques are necessary when Malassezia is suspected.
35
CHAPTER 16 Total Parenteral Nutrition
https://t.me/medicina_free
475
Guidelines for management of an infant with a central line in place with suspected sepsis are as follows:
• The infant should be evaluated for potential
sources of infection, including a general phys-
ical examination looking for non–TPN-related
sources and inspection of peripheral and central
venous sites for erythema.
• Laboratory assessment should include (1) com-
plete blood cell count with platelet count and (2)
aerobic blood cultures. Other cultures, including
urine, tracheal aspirate, and cerebrospinal fluid,
may be indicated, based on clinical findings. A
blood fungal culture should be considered if the
infant has had preceding antibiotic treatment or
signs of fungal infection.
16,17,63
• A chest x-ray evaluation should be performed if
the infant demonstrates signs of respiratory distress
or there is a need to reassess catheter position.
• Consider decreasing or discontinuing lipid
infusion until the infection has been treated for
24 to 48 hours.
11,108
• If the infant is critically ill, the central line should
be removed immediately. If the infant is stable,
treatment may be considered through the line.
• A positive blood culture generally is con-
sidered to indicate bacteremia or sepsis in
a newborn with a central line in place.
However, the coagulase-negative Staphylococcus,
an opportunistic organism that is a common
cause of catheter-related sepsis, also is normal
skin flora and frequently contaminates blood
cultures. Use of ancillary diagnostic tools, such as
the C-reactive protein levels and complete blood
counts, are helpful to distinguish false-positive
results from true infections. Some clinicians also
recommend obtaining two cultures (two periph-
eral, or one peripheral and one from the line)
before starting antibiotics. If both yield positive
results, catheter-related sepsis is confirmed.
83
• If bacteremia is documented but the signs
of sepsis are improved, the catheter may
remain in place while being used for anti-
biotic treatment. One should be sure that the
antibiotics are compatible with the TPN solution
(to avoid stopping the TPN during the antibiotic
infusion). A follow-up blood culture and close
clinical monitoring are necessary to document
that the infection has been treated adequately.
If a central line is pulled because of sepsis, a new central line should not be placed for 48 to 72 hours.
PARENT TEACHING
In-Hospital Total Parenteral Nutrition
Clinicians caring for an ill newborn must be atten­tive to the involvement and emotional state of the parents. There remain a number of concerns for child abuse, foster placement, and relinquishment among infants who have been cared for in the NICU compared with healthy term newborns, especially when care has been prolonged and complex.
Clinical conditions or policies that promote separation of parents from their infant increase the risk for bonding problems. When a newborn infant cannot be fed orally, an important, normal part of the infant’s care is no longer available for the parents. The placement of a central line may be frightening to parents and result in less handling and caregiving.
Infants requiring continuous care, including TPN, should have primary nursing (one regu­larly scheduled nurse), and the parents should have regular and consistent communication with a primary physician. Care providers should attempt to keep the parents involved in other parts of the infant’s care because the parents are unable to feed the infant. Parents should be fully informed about the purpose and appropri­ate care of the infant’s central line so they will feel comfortable handling their infant with the line in place.
53
Home Total Parenteral Nutrition
Home parenteral nutrition has been used in infants with congenital intestinal anomalies or after massive bowel resection for NEC. TPN
is initiated in the hospital. If growing and other­wise well, the infant may be a candidate for TPN at home. Issues to be addressed include ability and willingness of parents to care for the infant at home, available financial support, adequate home setting, pharmacy support services, and additional skilled nursing care needed. The infant should have a more permanent central line placed as early in the dis­charge process as possible. Parent teaching should begin early, including verbal and written instruction and hands-on practice and return demonstrations (Box 16.1).
Administration of TPN at home is different from
hospital administration of TPN and is typically
UNIT THREE Metabolic and Nutritional Care of the Neonate476
https://t.me/medicina_free
BOX
16.1
PARENT/CAREGIVER TEACHING HOME ADMINISTRATION OF PARENTERAL NUTRITION
• Strict handwashing and aseptic handling of tubing connections and hubs
• Use of infusion pump
• Monitoring of site for signs of infection, phlebitis, or leaking
• Troubleshooting for occlusion, leaking, extravasation
• Evaluation for signs of systemic infection
• Emergency response to broken or dislodged catheter, loss of electri­cal power
• Developmental care: oral stimulation, holding, appropriate play activities
• Dressing care and changes
• Monitoring for signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia
• Securing or taping of line to avoid dislodgement with positioning and handling
managed by a pediatric gastroenterology service in conjunction with a home infusion therapy or pharmacy service. Infants often go home on a cyclic TPN regimen (12 hours/day). An ambulatory pump improves the mobility and flexibility of the parent and infant and allows a more normal life.
Compliance and success with home TPN are greatly increased when the parents understand the need for and the appropriate way to admin­ister TPN and how to troubleshoot and care for the catheter.
54
REFERENCES
1. Adamkin DD, Radmacher P, Rosen P. Comparison of a
neonatal versus general-purpose amino acid formulation in preterm neonates. J Perinatol. 1995;15(2):108.
2. Adamkin DH. Early total parenteral nutrition in very
low birth weight infants: is it safe? Is it worth it? J Pediatr. 2013;163(3):622.
3. Aggarwal R, Gathwala G, Yadav S, Kumar P. Selenium supple-
mentation for prevention of late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight preterm neonates. J Trop Pediatr. 2016;62(3):185.
4. Ainsworth SB, McGuire W. Percutaneous central venous
catheters versus peripheral cannulae for delivery of par­enteral nutrition in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;10:CD004219.
5. Ainsworth SB, McGuire W. Peripherally inserted central cathe-
ters vs peripheral cannulas for delivering parenteral nutrition in neonates. J Am Med Assoc. 2016;315(23):2612.
6. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Nutrition:
aluminum toxicity in infants and children. Pediatrics. 1996;97:413. Reaffirmed in Pediatrics. 2004;114(4):1126.
7. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on nutrition: parenteral nutrition. In: Kleinman RE, ed . Pediatric Nutrition Handbook. 7th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2013.
8. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on nutrition: protein. In: Kleinman RE, ed . Pediatric Nutrition Handbook. 7th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL; 2013.
9. The Academy American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. The Handbook of Injectable Drugs. 20th ed. Bethesda, MD: ASHP;
2018.
10. Arsenault D, Brenn M, Kim S, et al. And the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN). Clinical guidelines: hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia in the neonate receiving parenteral nutrition. J Parenteral Enteral Nutrition. 2012;36(1):81.
11. Avila-Figueroa C, Goldmann DA, Richardson DC, et al. Intravenous lipid emulsions are the major determinant of coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteremia in very low birth weight newborns. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998;17(1):10.
12. Baker RD, Greer FR, Committee on Nutrition. Clinical report-diagnosis and prevention of iron deficiency and iron-de­ficiency anemia in infants and young children (0-3 years of age). Pediatrics. 2010;126(5):1040.
13. Balegar VKK, Azeem MI, Spence K, et al. Extending total par­enteral nutrition hang time in the neonatal intensive care unit: is it safe and cost effective? J Paediatr Child Health. 2013; 49(1):E57.
14. Beardsall K, Vanhaesebrouck S, Ogilvy-Stuart AL, et al. Early insulin therapy in very-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(18):1873.
15. Bell T, O’Grady NP. Prevention of central line-associ­ated blood stream infections. Infect Dis Clin North Amer. 2017;31(3):551.
16. Benjamin DK Jr, Miller W, Garges H, et al. Bacteremia, central catheters, and neonates: when to pull the line. Pediatrics. 2001;107(6):1272.
17. Benjamin DK Jr, Ross K, McKinney RE Jr, et al. When to suspect fungal infection in neonates: a clinical comparison of Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis fungemia with coagulase-nega­tive staphylococcal bacteremia. Pediatrics. 2000;106(4):712.
18. Bishop NJ, Morley R, Day JP, et al. Aluminum neurotoxicity in preterm infants receiving intravenous feeding solutions. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(22):1557.
19. Blackmer AB, Partipilo ML. Three-in-one parenteral nutrition for neonates and pediatric patients: risks and benefits. Nutr Clin Pract. 2015;30(3):337.
20. Blackwood BP, Farrow KN, Kim S, Hunter CJ. Peripherally inserted central catheters complicated by vascular erosion in neonates. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016;40(6):890.
21. Bonsante F, Iacobelli S, Chantegret C, et al. The effect of par­enteral nitrogen and energy intake on electrolyte balance in the preterm infant. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011;65(10):1088.
22. Borghesi A, Stronati M. Strategies for the prevention of hos­pital-acquired infections in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect. 2008;68(4):293.
23. Bottino M, Cowett RM, Sinclair JC. Interventions for treat­ment of neonatal hyperglycemia in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;10:CD007453.
24. Boullata JI, Gilbert K, Sacks G, et al. A.SPEN Clinical guide­lines: parenteral nutrition ordering, order review, compound­ing, labeling, and dispensing. JPEN (J Parenter Enteral Nutr). 2014;38(3):334.
CHAPTER 16 Total Parenteral Nutrition
https://t.me/medicina_free
477
25. Brion LP, Bell EF, Raghuveer TS. Vitamin E supplementation for prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;3:CD003665.
26. Bruzoni M, Slater BJ, Wall J, et al. A prospective randomized trial of ultrasound vs landmark-guided central venous access in the pediatric population. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(5):939.
27. Burattini I, Bellagamba MP, Spagnoli C, et al. Targeting
2.5 versus 4 g/kg/day of amino acids for extremely low birth weight infants: a randomized clinical trial. J Pediatr. 2013;163(5):1278.
28. Cairns PA, Stalker DJ. Carnitine supplementation of parenterally fed neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;4:CD000950.
29. Chang HY, Hsu CH, Tsai JD, et al. Renal calcification in very low birth weight infants. Pediatr Neonatol. 2011;52(3):148.
30. Chen CY, Tsao PN, Chen HL, et al. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy in very-low-birth-weight infants with paren­teral nutrition associated cholestasis. J Pediatr. 2004;145(3):317.
31. Cheong JL, Burnett AC, Kee KJ, the Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group, et al. Association between postnatal dexamethasone for treatment of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and brain volumes at adolescence in infants born preterm. J Pediatr. 2014;164(4):737.
32. Chessex P, Harr ison A, Khashu M, et al. In preterm neonates, is the risk of developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia influenced by the failure to protect total parenteral nutrition from expo­sure to ambient light? J Pediatr. 2007;151(2):213.
33. Chessex P, Laborie S, Nasef N, Masse B, Lavoie JC. Shielding parenteral nutrition from light improves survival rate in prema­ture infants. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2017;41(3):378.
34. Christensen RD, Henry E, Wiedmeier SE, et al. Identifying patients, on the first day of life, at high risk of developing paren­teral nutrition-associated liver disease. J Perinatol. 2007;27(5):284.
35. Chryssanthou E, Broberger U, Petrini B. Malassezia pachyder­matis fungaemia in a neonatal intensive care unit. Acta Paediatr. 2001;90(3):323.
36. Clark RH, Thomas P, Peabody J. Extrauterine growth restric­tion remains a serious problem in prematurely born neonates. Pediatrics. 2003;111(5 pt 1):986.
37. Coleman MM, Spear ML, Finkelstein M, et al. Short-term use of umbilical artery catheters may not be associated with increased risk for thrombosis. Pediatrics. 2004;113(4):770.
38. Dahl GB, Svensson L, Kinnander NJ, et al. Stability of vitamins in soybean oil fat emulsion under conditions simulating intravenous feeding of neonates and children. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1994;18(3):234.
39. Darlow BA, Graham PJ, Rojas-Reyes MX. Vitamin A sup­plementation to prevent mortality and short and long-term morbidity in very low birthweight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;8:CD000501.
40. Darmaun D, Lapillonne A, Simeoni U, And the Committee on nutrition of the French Society of pediatrics (CNSFP) and French Society of Neonatology (SFN), et al. Parenteral nutrition for preterm infants: issues and strategies. Arch Pediatr. 2018;25(4):286.
41. Denne SC, Poindexter BB. Evidence supporting early nutri­tional support with parenteral amino acid infusion. Semin Perinatol. 2007;31(2):56.
42. Dinerstein A, Nieto RM, Solana CL, et al. Early and aggressive nutritional strategy (parenteral and enteral) decreases postnatal growth failure in very low birth weight infants. J Perinatol. 2006;26(7):436.
43. Drenckpohl D, McConnell C, Gaffney S, Niehaus M, Macwan KS. Randomized controlled trial of very low birth weight infants receiving higher rates of infusion of intravenous fat emulsions during the first week of life. Pediatrics. 2008;122(4):743.
44. Dudrick SJ. Early developments and clinical applications of total parenteral nutrition. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003;27(4):291.
45. Ehrenkranz RA. Early, aggressive nutritional management for very low birth weight infants: what is the evidence? Semin Perinatol. 2007;31(2):48.
46. Ehrenkranz RA, Dusick AM, Vohr BR, et al. Growth in the neonatal intensive care unit influences neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2006;117(4):1253.
47. Embleton ND. Optimal protein and energy intakes in preterm infants. Early Hum Dev. 2007;83(12):831.
48. Faessler B, McCombie G, Biedermann M, Felder F, Subotic IJ. Leaching of plasticizers from polyvinylchloride perfusion lines by different lipid emulsions for premature infants under clinical conditions. Int J Pharm. 2017;520(1–2):119.
49. Farrag HM, Cowett RM. Glucose homeostasis in the micro­premie. Clin Perinatol. 2000;27(1):1.
50. Finch CW. Review of trace mineral requirements for preterm infants: what are the current recommendations for clinical practice? Nutr Clin Pract. 2015;30(1):44.
51. Furdon SA, Horgan MJ, Bradshaw WT, et al. Nurses’ guide to early detection of umbilical arterial catheter complications in infants. Adv Neonatal Care. 2006;6(5):242.
52. Gargasz A. Neonatal and pediatric parenteral nutrition. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2012;23(4):451.
53. Gorski LA, Hadaway L, Hagle M, et al. 2016 Infusion therapy standards of practice. J Infus Nurs. 2016;39(suppl 1):S1.
54. Grant J. Recognition. prevention, and treatment of home total parenteral nutrition central venous access complications. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002;26(suppl 5):S21.
55. Gura KM, Duggan CP, Collier SB, et al. Reversal of parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease in two infants with short bowel syndrome using parenteral fish oil: implications for future management. Pediatrics. 2006;118(1):e197.
56. Hall AR, Arnold CJ, Miller GG, Zello GA. Infant parenteral nutrition remains a significant source for aluminum toxicity. JPEN (J Parenter Enteral Nutr). 2017;41(7):1228.
57. Hardy IJ, Gillanders L, Hardy G. Is manganese an essential supplement for parenteral nutrition? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2008;11(3):289.
58. Hay WW Jr. Strategies for feeding the preterm infant. Neonatology. 2008;94(4):245.
59. Hay WW Jr, Rozance PJ. Neonatal hyperglycemia—causes, treatments, and cautions. J Pediatr. 2018;200:6.
60. Hay WW Jr, Thureen P. Protein for preterm infants: how much is needed? How much is enough? How much is too much? Pediatr Neonatol. 2010;51(4):198.
61. Hu F, Tang Q, Wang Y, et al. Analysis of nutrition support in very low birth weight infants with extrauterine growth restric­tion. Nutr Clin Pract. 2019;34(3):436.
62. Ibrahim HM, Jeroudi MA, Baier RJ, Dhanireddy R, Krouskop RW. Aggressive early total parenteral nutrition in low-birth­weight infants. J Perinatol. 2004;24(5):482.
63. Karlowicz MG, Hashimoto LN, Kelly RE, et al. Should central venous catheters be removed as soon as candidemia is detected in neonates? Pediatrics. 2000;106(5):e63.
64. Kaufman SS. Prevention of parenteral nutrition associated liver disease in children. Pediatr Transplant. 2002;6(1):37.
UNIT THREE Metabolic and Nutritional Care of the Neonate478
https://t.me/medicina_free
65. Kerner JA, Garcia-Carenga MG, Fisher AA, et al. Treatment of catheter occlusion in pediatric patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2006;30(1):S73.
66. Khashu M, Harr ison A, Lalari V, et al. Photoprotection of parenteral nutrition enhances advancement of minimal enteral nutrition in preterm infants. Semin Perinatol. 2006;30(3):139.
67. Khashu M, Harr ison A, Lalari V, et al. Impact of shielding parenteral nutrition from light on routine monitoring of blood glucose and triglyceride in preterm neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009;94(2):F111.
68. Kilbride HW, Power s R, Wirtschafter DD, et al. Evaluation and development of potential better practices to prevent neonatal nosocomial bacteremia. Pediatrics. 2003;111(4 pt 2):e504.
69. Kilbride HW, Wirtschafter DD, Powers RJ, et al. Implementation of evidence-based potentially better practices to decrease nosocomial infections. Pediatrics. 2003;111(4 pt 2):e519.
70. Klein GL. Aluminum in parenteral solutions revisited—again. Am J Clin Nutr. 1995;61(3):449.
71. Klevebro S, Westin V, Stoltz Sjostrom E, et al. Early energy and protein intakes and associations with growth, BPD, and ROP in extremely preterm infants. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(3):1289 (Epub ahead of print).
72. Kline AM. Pediatric catheter-related bloodstream infec­tions: latest strategies to decrease risk. AACN Clin Issues. 2005;16(2):185.
73. Lapillionne A. Enteral and parenteral lipid requirement of preterm infants. World Rev Nutr Diet. 2014;110:82.
74. Lee MD, Yoon JF, Kim SI, et al. Stability of total admixtures in reference to ambient temperatures. Nutrition. 2003;19(10):886.
75. Lee S, Gura KM, Kim S, et al. Current clinical applications of omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids. Nutr Clin Pract. 2006;21(4):323.
76. Lehmann CU, Conner KG, Cox JM. Preventing provider errors: online total parenteral nutrition calculator. Pediatrics. 2004;113(4):748.
77. Leick-Rude MK, Haney B. Midline catheter use in the inten­sive care nursery. Neonatal Netw. 2006;25(3):189.
78. Leitch CA, Denne SC. Energy expenditure in the extremely low-birth weight infant. Clin Perinatol. 2000;27(1):181.
79. Lucas A, Morley R, Cole TJ. Randomised trial of early diet in preterm babies and later intelligence quotient. BMJ. 1998;317(7171):1481.
80. MacKay M, Anderson C, Boehme S, Cash J, Zobell J. Frequency and severity of parenteral nutrition medication errors at a large Children’s hospital after implementation of electronic ordering and compounding. Nutr Clin Pract. 2016;31(2):195.
81. Matlow AG, Kitai I, Kirpalani H, et al. A randomized trial of 72- versus 24-hour intravenous tubing set changes in newborns receiving lipid therapy. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20(7):487.
82. McKinnon BT. FDA safety alert: hazards of precipitation asso­ciated with parenteral nutrition. Nutr Clin Pract. 1996;11(2):59.
83. Mermel LA, Farr BM, Sherertz RJ, et al. Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001;22(3):222.
84. Meyer MP, Haworth C, Meyer JH, et al. A comparison of oral and intravenous iron supplementation in preterm infants receiv­ing recombinant erythropoietin. J Pediatr. 1996;129(2):258.
85. Mirtallo J, Canada T, Johnson D, et al. Safe practices for paren­teral nutrition. JPEN (J Parenter Enteral Nutr). 2004;28(6):S39.
86. Moe-Byrne T, Brown JV, McGuire W. Glutamine supplemen­tation to prevent morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD001457.
87. Morgan C. Early amino acid administration in very preterm infants: too little, too late or too much, too soon? Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;18(3):160.
88. Moyses HE, Johnson MJ, Leaf AA, et al. Early parenteral nutrition and growth outcomes in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97(4):816.
89. Murai DT. Are femoral Broviac catheters effective and safe? A prospective comparison of femoral and jugular venous Broviac catheters in newborn infants. Chest. 2002;121(5):1527.
90. Murphy BP, Inder TE, Huppi PS, et al. Impaired cerebral corti­cal gray matter growth after treatment with dexamethasone for neonatal chronic lung disease. Pediatrics. 2001;107(2):217–293.
91. Nedergaard J, Cannon B. Brown adipose tissue: development and function. In: Polin RA, F ox WW, Abman S, eds. Fetal and Neonatal Physiology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2016.
92. Ogilvy-Stuart AL, Beardsall K. Management of hyperglycae­mia in the preterm infant. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010;95(2):F126.
93. Phipps K, Modic A, O’Riordan MA, et al. A randomized trial of the Vein Viewer versus standard technique for placement of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in neonates. J Perinatol. 2012;32(7):498.
94. Pierro A, Eaton S. Metabolism and nutrition in the surgical neonate. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2008;17(4):276.
95. Premji S, Fenton T, Sauve R. Does amount of protein in formula matter for low-birthweight infants? JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2006;30(6):507.
96. Putet G. Lipid metabolism of the micropremie. Clin Perinatol. 2000;27(1):57.
97. Puthoff TD. Enhancing parenteral nutrition therapy for the neonate. Nutr Clin Pract: Pediatrics Neonates. 2007;22(2):183.
98. Qiao L, Tang Q, Wenying Z, et al. Effects of early parenteral iron combined erythropoietin in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltim). 2017;96(9):e5795.
99. Rangel SJ, Calkins CM, Cowles RA, and the 2011 American pediatric surgical association outcomes and clinical tr ials Committee, et al. Parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis: an American pediatric surgical association outcomes and clinical tri­als Committee systematic review. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47(1):225.
100. Reynolds RM, Bas KD, Thureen PJ. Achieving positive protein balance in the immediate postoperative period in neonates undergoing abdominal surgery. J Pediatr. 2008;152(1):63.
101. Roberts SA, Ball RO, Moore AM, et al. The effect of graded intake of glycly-L-tyrosine on phenylalanine and tyrosine metabolism in parenterally fed neonates with an estimation of tyrosine requirement. Pediatr Res. 2001;49(1):111.
102. Rowe MI, Rowe SA. The last fifty years of neonatal surgical management. Am J Surg. 2000;180(5):345.
103. Rozance PJ, Hay WW Jr. Neonatal hyperglycemia. NeoReviews. 2010;11:e632.
104. Sentipal-Walerius J, Dollberg S, Mimouni F, et al. Effect of pulsed dexamethasone therapy on tolerance of intravenously administered lipids in extremely low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 1999;134(2):229.
105. Sertic AJ, Connolly BL, Temole Mj, et al. Perforations associ­ated with peripherally inserted central catheters in a neonatal population. Pediatr Radiol. 2018;48(1):109.
106. Shah PS, Shah VS. Continuous heparin infusion to prevent thrombosis and catheter occlusion in neonates with periph­erally placed percutaneous central venous catheters. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. 2008;2:CD002772.