Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_37_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
17 Мб
Скачать
☆
CHAPTER 12 Pain and Pain Relief
https://t.me/medicina_free
329
269. Martakis K, Hunseler C, Thangavelu K, Kr ibs A, Roth B. Pain­related reactions among premature infants and gestational age less than 26 weeks: an observational cohort study. Neonatalogy. 2016;110(4):261.
270. Matar EM, Arabiat DH, Foster MJ. Oral glucose efficacy on neonate’s pain rsponses at the NICU: a quasi experimental trial of two clinical procedures. Appl Nurs Res. 2016;32:36.
271. Maulidi H, McNair C, Seller N, et al. Arrhythmia associated with tetracaine in an extremely low birth weight premature infant. Pediatrics. 2012;130(6):e1704.
272. McClain B, Kain Z. Procedural pain in neonates: the new millennium. Pediatrics. 2005;115(4):1073.
273. McClain L, Ellis J, Rowley B. Evaluation of the pain resource nurse role: a resource for improving pediatric pain manage­ment. Pain Manag Nurs. 2004;5(1):29.
274. McGinnis K, Murray E, Cherven B, McCracken C, Travers C. Effect of vibration on pain response to heel lance. Adv Neonatal Care. 2016;16(6):439.
275. McGown R. Caudal analgesia in children: 500 cases for proce­dures below the diaphragm. Anaesthesia. 1982;37(8):806.
276. McGrath P, Unruh A. The social context of neonatal pain. Clin Perinatol. 2002;29(3):555.
277. McPherson C. Sedation and analgesia in mechanically venti­lated preterm neonates: continue standard of care or experi­ment? J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2012;17(4):351.
278. McPherson C, Grunau RE. Neonatal pain control and neuro­logic effects of anesthetics and sedatives in preterm infants. Clin Perinatol. 2014;41(1):209.
279. Meesters N, Simons S, Van Rosmalen J, et al. Waiting 2 minutes after sucrose administration—unnecessary? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017;102(2):F167.
280. Menon G, Boyle EM, McIntosh N, et al. Morphine analgesia and gastrointestinal morbidity in preterm infants: secondary results from the NEOPAIN Trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008;93(5):F362.
281. Meyer R, Campbell J, Raja S. Peripheral neural mechanisms of nociception. In: Wall P, Melzack R, eds. Textbook of Pain. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1994.
282. Milazzo W, Fielder J, Bittel A, et al. Oral sucrose to decrease pain from arterial puncture in infants 30–36 weeks’ gestation. Adv Neonatal Care. 2011;11(6):406.
283. Milbrandt T, Kryscio R, Muchow R, et al. Oral sucrose for pain relief during clubfoot casting: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. J Pediat Orthop. 2018;38(8):430.
284. Mitchell AJ, Hall RW, Golianu B, et al. Does non-invasive electrical stimulation of acupuncture points reduce heelstick pain in neonates. Acta Paediatr. 2016;105(12):1434.
285. Mitchell AJ, Yates CC, Williams DK, et al. Does daily kangaroo care provide sustained pain and stress relief in preterm infants? J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2013;6(1):45.
286. Montirosso R, Del Prete A, Bellu R, et al. Level of NICU qual­ity of developmental care and neurobehavioral performance in very preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2012;129(5):e1129.
287. Montirosso R, Casini E, Dei Prete A, et al. Neonatal devel­opmental care in infant pain management and internalizing behaviors at 18 months in prematurely born children. Eur J Pain. 2016;20(6):1010.
288. Mooney-Leber SM, Brummelte S. Neonatal pain and educated maternal care: early-life stressors interacting to impact brain and behavioral development. Neuroscience. 2017;342:21.
289. Morison S, Grunau R, Oberlander T, et al. Relations between behavioral and cardiac autonomic reactivity to acute pain in preterm neonates. Clin J Pain. 2001;17(4):350.
290. Morison S, Holsti L, Grunau R, et al. Are there developmen­tally distinct motor indicators of pain in preterm infants? Early Hum Dev. 2003;72(2):131.
291. Mountcastle K. An ounce of prevention: decreasing painful interventions in the NICU. Neonatal Netw. 2010;29(6):353.
292. Munsters J, Wallstrom L, Agren J, et al. Skin conductance mea­surements as pain assessment in newborn infants born at 22–27 weeks’ gestational age at different postnatal age. Early Human Dev. 2012;88(1):21.
293. Murmu J, Venkatnarayan K, Thapar RK, et al. When alternative female kangaroo care is provided by other immediate post-par­tum mothers, it reduces postprocedural pain in preterm babies more than swaddling. Acta Paediatr. 2017;106(3):411.
294. Naughton KA. The combined use of sucrose and nonnutritive sucking for procedural pain in both term and preterm neonates. Adv Neonatal Care. 2013;13(1):9.
295. Ng E, Taddio A, Ohlsson A. Intravenous midazolam infusion for sedation of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;1:CD002052.
296. Nimbalkar SM, Chaudhary NS, Gadhavi KV, Phatak A. Kangaroo mother care in reducing pain in preterm neonates on heel prick. Indian J Pediatr. 2013;80(1):6.
297. Nguyen The Tisch S, Vecchierini M, Debillon T, et al. Effects of sufentanil on EEG in VLBW and ELBW preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2003;111(1):123.
298. Oberlander T, Grunau R, Fitzgerald C, et al. Does paren­chymal brain injury affect biobehavioral pain responses in VLBW infants at 32 weeks’ postconceptual age? Pediatrics. 2002;110(3):570.
299. Oberlander T, Saul JP. Methodological considerations for the use of heart rate variability as a measure of pain reactivity in vulnerable infants. Clin Perinatol. 2002;29(3):427.
300. Oberlander TF, Grunau RE, Whitfield MF, et al. Biobehavioral pain responses in former extremely low birth weight infants at 4 months’ corrected age. Pediatrics. 2000;105(1):e6.
301. O’Brien L, Taddio A, Lyszkiewicz DA, et al. A critical review of the topical anesthetic amethocaine (Ametop) for pediatric pain. Paediatr Drugs. 2005;7(1):41.
302. O’Mara K, Gal P, Wimmer J, et al. Dexedetomidine versus standard therapy with fentanyl for sedation in mechanically-ventilated neonates. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2012;17(3):252.
303. Ogawa S, Ogihara T, Fujiwara E, et al. Venipuncture is prefera­ble to heel lance for blood sampling in term neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90(5):F432.
304. Ohlsson A, McMillan D, Schmidt B, et al. Variations in use of narcotics, benzodiazepines and pancuronium in newborn babies with assisted ventilation. Pediatr Res. 1999;45:313A.
305. Ohlsson A, Shah PS. Paracetamol (acetaminophen) for preven­tion or treatment of pain in newborns. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;7:CD11219.
306. Olischar M, Davidson AJ, Lee KJ, Hunt RW. Effects of morphine and midazolam on sleep-wake cycling in amplitude-integrated electroencephalography in post-sur­gical neonates ≥32 weeks of gestational age. Neonatology. 2012;101(4):293.
307. Olsson E, Ahlsen G, Eriksson M. Skin-to-skin contact reduces near-infrared spectroscopy pain responses in premature infants during blood sampling. Acta Paediatr. 2016;2015(4):376.
308. Orr T, Campbell-Yeo M, Benoit B, et al. Smartphone and internet preferences of parents: information needs and desired involvement in infant care and pain management in the NICU. Adv Neonatal Care. 2017;17(2):131.
UNIT TWO Support of the Neonate330
https://t.me/medicina_free
309. Ozawa M, Yokoo K, Funaba Y, et al. A quality improvement collaborative program for neonatal pain management in Japan. Adv Neonatal Care. 2017;17(3):184.
310. Pacifici GM, Allegaert K. Clinical pharmacology of paracetamol in neonates: a review. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2015;77:24.
311. Pallai Riddell RR, Racine NM, Gennis HG, et al. Non-pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;12:CD006275.
312. Parker J, Vats A, Bauer G. EMLA toxicity after application for allergy testing. Pediatrics. 2004;113(2):410.
313. Partridge JC, Wall SN. Analgesia for dying infants whose life support is withdrawn or withheld. Pediatrics. 1997;99(1):76.
314. Pasero C, McCaffery M. The undertreatment of pain: are pro­viders accountable for it? Am J Nurs. 2001;101(11):62.
315. Patel A, Czerniawski B, Gray S, et al. Does amethocaine gel reduce pain from heel prick blood sampling in premature infants? A randomized double-blind cross-over controlled study. Paediatr Child Health. 2003;8(4):222.
316. Peng HF, Yin T, Yang L, et al. Non-nutritive sucking, oral breastmilk, and facilitated tucking relieve preterm infant pain during heel-stick procedures a prospective, randomized con­trolled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;77:162.
317. Perrone S, Bellieni CV, Negro S, et al. Oxidative stress as a physiologic pain response in full-term newborns. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017:3759287.
318. Peters J, Koot H, deBoer J, et al. Major surgery within the first 3 months of life and subsequent biobehavioral pain responses to immunizations at later age: a case comparison study. Pediatrics. 2003;111(1):129.
319. Peters JW, Schouw R, Anand KJ, et al. Does neonatal surgery lead to increased pain sensitivity in later childhood? Pain. 2005;114(3):444.
320. Pierucci R, Russell K, Leuthner S. End-of-life care for neo­nates and infants: the experience and effects of a palliative care consultation service. Pediatrics. 2001;108(3):653.
321. Pillai Riddell RR, Racine NM, Gennis HG, et al. Non­pharmacologic management of infant and young child proce­dural pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;12:CD006275.
322. Pineles BL, Sandman CA, Waffarn F, et al. Sensitization of cardiac responses to pain in preterm infants. Neonatology. 2007;91(3):190.
323. Polkki T, Korhonen A, Laukkala H. Parents’ use of nonpharma­cologic methods to manage procedural pain in infants. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2018;47(1):43.
324. Porter F, Grunau R, Anand KJ. Long-term effects of neonatal pain. J Behav Dev Pediatr. 1999;20(4):253.
325. Porter FL, Wolf CM, Miller JP, et al. Procedural pain in newborn infants: the influence of intensity and development. Pediatrics. 1999;104(1):105.
326. Potana NT, Dongara AR, Nimbalkar SM, et al. Oral sucrose for pain in neonates during echocardiography: a randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr. 2015;52(6):493.
327. Provenzi L, Giorda R, Fumagalli M, et al. Pain exposure associates with telomere length erosion in very preterm infants. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2018;89:113.
328. Provenzi L, Giusti L, Fumagalli M, et al. Pain-related stress in the neonatal intensive care unit and salivary cortisol reactivity to socio-emotional stress in 3-month-old very preterm infants. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016;72:161.
329. Prymula R, Siegrist CA, Chilbek R, et al. Effect of prophylactic paracetamol administration at time of vaccination on febrile reactions and antibody responses in children: two open-label, randomized controlled trials. Lancet. 2009;374(9698):1339.
330. Qiu J, Jian Y, Li F, et al. Effect of combined music and touch intervention on pain response and beta-endorphin and cortisol concentrations in late preterm infants. Br Med J. 2017;17(1):38.
331. Radziewicz RM, Wright-Esber S, Zupancic J, Gargiulo D, Woodall P. Safety of Reiki therapy for newborns at risk for neonatal abstinence syndrome. Holistic Nurse Pract. 2018;32(2):63.
332. Raffaeli G, Cristofori G, Befani B, et al. EDIN scale imple­mented by gestational age for pain assessment in preterms: a prospective study. BioMed Res Int. 2017; 2017:9253710. Available at: http://dxdoi.org/10.1155/2017/9253710.
333. Ranger M, Chau CM, Garg A, et al. Neonatal pain-related stress predicts cortical thickness at age 7 years in children born very preterm. PLoS One. 2013;8:e76702.
334. Ranger M, Grunau RE. Early repetitive pain in preterm infants in relation to the developing brain. Pain Manag. 2014;4(10):57.
335. Rao R, Sampers JS, Kronsberg SS, et al. Neurobehavior of preterm infants at 36 weeks postconception as a function of morphine analgesia. Am J Perinatol. 2007;24(9):511.
336. Rebagliato M, Cuttini M, Broggin L, et al. Neonatal end-of-life decision-making: physicians’ attitudes and relationship with self-reported practices in 10 European countries. J Am Med Assoc. 2000;284(19):2451.
337. Reece-Stremtan S, Gray L, the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Protocol Committee. ABM clinical protocol #23: non-pharmacologic management of procedure-related pain in the breastfeeding infant. Breastfeed Med. 2016;11:425. Available online at: www.bfmed.org.
338. Rioualen S, Durier V, Herve D, et al. Cortical pain response of newborn infants to venepuncture: a randomized controlled trial comparing analgesic effects of sucrose versus breastfeeding. Clin J Pain. 2018;34(7):650.
339. Rochefort CM, Rathwell BA, Clarke SP. Rationing of nursing care its association with nurse-reported outcomes in the neonatal intensive care unit: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Nurs. 2016;15:46.
340. Rohan AJ. The utility of pain scores obtained during “regular reassessment process” in premature infants in the NICU. J Perinatol. 2014;45(7):532.
341. Roman-Rodriguez CF, Toussaint T, Sherlock DJ, et al. Pre­emptive penile ring block with sucrose analgesia reduces pain response to neonatal circumcision. Urology. 2013;83(4):893.
342. Royal College of Nursing. Clinical Practice Guidelines: The
Recognition and Assessment of Acute Pain in Children, Update of Full Guideline. London: Royal College of Nursing; 2009.
343. Ruda M, Ling Q, Hohmann A, et al. Altered nociceptive neuronal circuits after neonatal peripheral inflammation. Science. 2000;289(5479):628.
344. Rutter N, Evans N. Cardiovascular effects of an intravenous bolus of morphine in the ventilated preterm infant. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2000;83(2):F101.
345. Saarenmaa E, Huttenun P, Leppaluoto J, et al. Advantages of fentanyl over morphine in analgesia for ventilated newborn infants after birth: a randomized trial. J Pediatr. 1999;134(2):144.
346. Saigal S, Feeny D, Rosenbaum P, et al. Self-perceived health status and health related quality of life of extremely low-birth­weight infants at adolescence. J Am Med Assoc. 1996;276(6):453.
347. Sato Y, Fukasawa T, Haya kawa M, et al. A new method of blood sampling reduces pain for newborn infants: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Early Hum Dev. 2007;83(6):389.
348. Schecter N, Berde C, Yaster M. Pain in Infants, Children and Adolescents. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002.
CHAPTER 12 Pain and Pain Relief
https://t.me/medicina_free
331
349. Schiavenato M, Holsti L. Defining procedural distress in the NICU and what can be done about it. Neonatal Netw. 2017;36(1):12.
350. Schmidt B, Adelmann C, Stutzer H, et al. Comparison of sufentanil versus fentanyl in ventilated term newborns. Klin Pediatr. 2010;222(2):62.
351. Sellam G, Cigmacco EL, Craig KD, Engberg S. Contextual factors influencing pain response to heelstick procedures in preterm infants: what do we know? A systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2011;15(7):661.
352. Sener A, Erdem E. A comparison of breast milk and sucrose in reducing neonatal pain during eye exam for retinopathy of prematurity. Breastfeed Med. 2017;12:305.
353. Shah PS, Herbozo C, Aliwalas LL, Shah VS. Breastfeeding or breast milk for procedural pain in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD004950.
354. Shah SR, Kadage S, Sinn J. Trial of music, sucrose, and combi­nation therapy for pain relief during heel prick procedures in neonates. J Pediatr. 2017;190:153.
355. Shah V, Jeffr ies A. Preterm infants receiving heel lance pro­cedures have slightly lower pain scores and quicker time to return to baseline heart rate when held in kangaroo care by the mother than by the father. Evid Based Med. 2012;17(5):153.
356. Shah V, Ohlsson A. Venipuncture versus heel lance for blood sampling in term neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;10:CD001452.
357. Shah V, Taddio A, Hancock R, et al. Topical amethocaine gel 4% for intramuscular injection in term neonates: a dou­ble-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Clin Ther. 2008;30(1):166.
358. Sharara-Chami R, Lakissian Z, Charafeddine L, Milad N, El-Hout Y. Combination analgesia for neonatal circumcision: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 140(6): pii: e20171935.
http://dxdoi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-1935. Nov 17 2017.
[Epub ahead of print].
359. Shen M, El-Chaar G. Reducing pain from heel lances in neonates following education on oral sucrose. Int J Clin Pharm. 2015;37(3):529.
360. Shultz EL, Switala M, Winning AM, et al. Multiple perspectives of symptoms and suffering at end of life in the NICU. Adv Neonatal Care. 2017;17(3):175.
361. Simonse E, Mulder PG, van Beek RH. Analgesic effect of breast milk versus sucrose for analgesia during heel lance in late preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2012;129(4):657.
362. Simons J, Franck L, Robertson E. Parent involvement in children’s pain care: views of parents and nurses. J Adv Nurs. 2002;36(4):591.
363. Simons S, van Dijk M, Anand KS, et al. Do we still hurt newborn babies? A prospective study of procedural pain and analgesia in neonates. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157(11):1058.
364. Simons S, van Dijk M, van Lingren R, et al. Routine mor­phine infusion in preterm newborns who received ventila­tory support: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc. 2003;290(18):2419.
365. Sizun J, Ansquer H, Browne J, et al. Developmental care decreases physiologic and behavioral pain expression. J Pain. 2002;3(6):446.
366. Slater R, Cantarella A, Franck L, et al. How well do clini­cal pain assessment tools reflect pain in infants? PLoS Med. 2008;5(6):e129.
367. Slater R, Cantarella A, Gallella S, et al. Cortical pain response in human infants. J Neurosci. 2006;26(14):3662.
368. Slater R, Cantarella A, Yoxen J, et al. Latency to facial expres­sion change following noxious stimulation in infants is depen­dent on postnatal age. Pain. 2009;146(1-2):177.
369. Slater R, Fabrizi L, Worley A, et al. Premature infants display increased noxious-evoked neuronal activity in the brain com­pared to healthy age-matched term-born infants. Neuroimage. 2010;52(2):583.
370. Smith GC, Gutovich J, Smyser C, et al. Neonatal intensive care unit stress is associated with brain development in preterm infants. Ann Neurol. 2011;70(4):541.
371. Sorrentino G, Fumagallia M, Milani S, et al. The impact of automatic devices for capillary blood collection on efficiency and pain response in newborns: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2017;72:24.
372. Sposito NPB, Rossato LM, Bueno M, et al. Assessment and management of pain in newborns hospitalized in a neona­tal intensive care unit: a cross-sectional study. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2017;25:e2931.
373. Stevens B. Pain in infants. In: McCaffery M, Pasero C, eds. Pain: Clinical Manual. 2nd ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 1999.
374. Stevens B, Franck L, Gibbins S, et al. Determining the structure of acute pain responses in vulnerable infants. Can J Nurs Res. 2007;23(1-2):32.
375. Stevens B, Gibbins S. Clinical utility and clinical significance in the assessment and management of pain in vulnerable infants. Clin Perinatol. 2002;29(3):459.
376. Stevens B, Johnston C, Hurton L. Factors that influence the behav­ioral pain responses of premature infants. Pain. 1994;59(1):101.
377. Stevens B, Johnston C, Petroshen P, et al. Premature infant pain profile: development and initial validation. Clin J Pain. 1996;12(1):13.
378. Stevens B, McGrath P, Gibbins S, et al. Procedural pain in newborns at risk for neurologic impairment. Pain. 2003;105(1-2):27.
379. Stevens B, Yamada J, Lee GY, Ohlsson A, Haliburton S, Shorkey A. Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;7:CD001069.
380. Stolik-Dollberg O, Dollberg S. Bupivacaine versus lidocaine analgesia for neonatal circumcision. Pediatr Res. 2004;55:518A.
381. Storm H. Why do similar studies conclude differently when they are performed with nearly the same protocol and the same ski conductance technology and on the same population of patients? Anesthesiology. 2011;114(2):464.
382. Stringer M, Shaw V, Savani R. Comfort care of neonates at the end of life. Neonatal Netw. 2004;23(5):41.
383. Sudia-Robinson T. Palliative care. In: Kenner C, McGrath J, eds. Developmental Care of Newborns and Infants. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 2004.
384. Taddio A. Opioid analgesia for infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. Clin Perinatol. 2002;29(3):493.
385. Taddio A, Goldbach M, Ipp M. Effect of neonatal circumcision on pain responses during vaccination in male infants. Lancet. 1995;345(8945):291.
386. Taddio A, Katz J. The effects of early pain experience in neonates on pain responses in infancy and childhood. Paediatr Drugs. 2005;7(4):245.
387. Taddio A, Katz J, Ilersich AL. Effects of neonatal circumci­sion on pain response during subsequent vaccination. Lancet. 1997;349(4):599.
388. Taddio A, Lee C, Yip A, et al. Intravenous morphine and topical tetracaine for treatment of pain in neonates undergoing central line placement. J Am Med Assoc. 2006;295(7):793.
UNIT TWO Support of the Neonate332
https://t.me/medicina_free
389. Taddio A, Ohlsson A, Einarson TR. A systematic review of lidocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) in the treatment of acute pain in neonates. Pediatrics. 1998;101(2):el.
390. Taddio A, Pollock N, Gilbert-MacLeod C, et al. Combined analgesia and local anesthesia to minimize pain during circum­cision. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154(6):620.
391. Taddio A, Riddell RP, Ipp M, et al. Relative effectiveness of addititive pain interventions during vaccination in infants. CMAJ (Can Med Assoc J). 2017;189(6):E227.
392. Taddio A, Shah V, Gilbert-MacLeod C, et al. Conditioning and hyperalgesia in newborns exposed to repeated heel lances. J Am Med Assoc. 2002;288(7):857.
393. Taddio A, Shah V, Katz J. Reduced infant response to a routine care procedure after sucrose analgesia. Pediatrics. 2009;123(3):e425.
394. Taddio A, Shah V, Stevens D, et al. Effect of liposomal lidocaine and sucrose alone and in combination for venipuncture pain in newborns. Pediatrics. 2011;127(4):e940.
395. Taquino L, Blackburn S. The effects of containment dur ing suction and heelstick on physiological and behavioral responses of preterm infants. Neonatal Netw. 1994;13:55.
396. Thakkar P, Arora K, Goyal K, et al. To evaluate and compare the efficacy of combined sucrose and non-nutritive sucking for analgesia in newborns undergoing minor painful procedure: a randomized controlled trial. J Perinatol. 2016;36(1):67.
397. Tibboel D, Anand KJ, van der Anker JN. The pharmaco­logic treatment of neonatal pain. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;10(2):195.
398. Tutag Lehr V, Cortez J, Grever W, et al. Randomized placebo­controlled trial of sucrose analgesia on neonatal skin blood flow and pain respons during heel lance. Clin J Pain. 2015;31(5):451.
399. Uzelli D, Yapucu Gunes U. Oral glucose solution to alleviate pain induced by intramuscular injection in preterm infants. J Spec Pediatr Nurs (JSPN). 2015;20(1):29.
400. Valeri BO, Gaspardo CM, Martinez FE, Linhares MB. Pain reactivity in preterm neonates: examining the sex differences. Eur J Pain. 2014;18(10):1431.
401. Valeri BO, Holsti L, Linhares MB. Neonatal pain and develop­mental outocmes in children born preterm: a systematic review. Clin J Pain. 2015;31(4):355.
402. Valkenburg AJ, Niehof SP, van Dijk M, et al. Skin conductance peaks could result from changes in vital parameters unrelated to pain. Pediatr Res. 2012;71(4 pt 1):375.
403. Van Dijk M, Tibboel D. Update on pain assessment in sick neonates and infants. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2012;59(5):1167.
404. Van Ganzewinkel CJLM, Been JV, Verbeek I, et al. Pain thresh­old, tolerance and intensity in adolescents born very preterm or with low birth weight. Early Human Dev. 2017;110:31.
405. Van Lingen R, Simons S, Anderson B, et al. The effects of anal­gesia in the vulnerable infant during the perinatal period. Clin Perinatol. 2002;29(3):511.
406. Vazques V, Cong X, DeJong A. Maternal and paternal knowl­edge and perceptions regarding infant pain in the NICU. Neonatal Netw. 2015;34(6):337.
407. Verr iotis M, Fabrizi L, Lee A, et al. Mapping cortical responses to somatosensory stimuli in human infants with simultaneous near-infrared spectroscopy and event-related potential record­ing. eNeuro. 2016;3(2):pii: ENEURO.0026-16. https://doi.
org/10.10.1523/ENEURO.0026-16.2016.
408. Vinall J, Miller SP, Chau V, et al. Neonatal pain in rela­tion to postnatal growth in infants born very preterm. Pain. 2012;153(7):1374.
409. Vinall J, Noel M, Disher T, Caddell K, Campbell-Yeo M. Memories of infant pain in the neonatal intensive care unit influence posttraumatic stress symptoms in mothers of infants born preterm. Clin J Pain. 2018;34(10):936.
410. Vitaliti SM, Costantino G, LiPuma L, et al. Painful procedures in the NICU. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(Suppl 4):146.
411. Walden M, Carrier C. Sleeping beauties. the impact of sedation on neonatal development. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2003;32(3):393.
412. Walden M, Gibbins S. Pain Assessment and Management: Guideline for Practice. 3rd ed. Glenview, IL: National Association of Neonatal Nurses; 2013.
413. Walker CD, Kudreikis K, Sherrard A, et al. Repeated neonatal pain influences maternal behavior, but not stress responsiveness in rat offspring. Dev Brain Res. 2003;140(2):253.
414. Walker SM, Franck LS, Fitzgerald M, et al. Long-term impact of neonatal intensive care and surgery on somatosen­sory perception in children born extremely preterm. Pain. 2009;141(1-2):79.
415. Ward K. Perceived needs of parents of critically ill infants in a NICU. Pediatr Nurs. 2001;27(3):281.
416. Weise K, Nahata M. EMLA for painful procedures in infants. J Pediatr Health Care. 2005;19(1):42.
417. Wereszczak J, Miles M, Holditch-Davis D. Maternal recall of the neonatal intensive care unit. Neonatal Netw. 1997;16(4):33.
418. Whitfield M, Grunau R. Behavior, pain perception and the extremely LBW survivor. Clin Perinatol. 2000;27(2):363.
419. Wilder R. Local anesthetics for the pediatric patient. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2000;47(3):545.
420. Williams AL, Khattak AZ, Garza CN, Lasky RE. The behavioral response to heelstick in preterm neonates studied longitudi­nally: description, development, determinants and components. Early Human Dev. 2009;85(6):369.
421. Worley A, Fabrizi L, Boyd S, Slater R. Multi-modal pain assess­ments in infants. J Neurosci Methods. 2012;205(2):252.
422. Yin T, Yang L, Lee TY, et al. Development of atraumatic heel-stick procedures combined treatment with non-nutritive sucking, oral sucrose and facilitated tucking: a randomized, con­trolled trial. Int J Nurs Stand. 2015;52(8):1288.
423. Zhu J, Hono-Gu H, Zhou X, et al. Pain relief effect of breast­feeding and music therapy during heel lance for healthy-term neonates in China: a randomized controlled trial. Midwifery. 2015;31(3):365.
424. Zimmerman KO, Smith PB, Benjamin DK, et al. Sedation, analgesia and paralysis during mechanical ventilation of prema­ture infants. J Pediatr. 2017;180:99.
425. Zargham-Boroujeni A, Elsagh A, Mohammadizadeh M. The effects of massage and breastfeeding on response to venipunc­ture pain amon hospitalized neonates. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2017;22(4):308.
RESOURCE MATERIALS AND WEBSITES
American Chronic Pain Association at www.theacpa.org or
1-916-632-0922.
American Nurses Association. Pain Management Nursing Scope and
Standards of Practice. 2nd ed. Washington, D.C: ANA; 2017.
American Pain Foundation at www.painfoundation.org or
1-888-615-PAIN. American Pain Society at www.ampainsoc.org or 1-847-375-4715. Anand KJS, Stevens BS, McGrath PJ. Pain in Neonates and Infants. 3rd
ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2007.
CHAPTER 12 Pain and Pain Relief
https://t.me/medicina_free
333
Campbell-Yeo M, Dol J, Disher J, et al. The Power of a
Parent’s Touch: evaluation of reach and impact of a tar­geted evidence-based YouTube video. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2017;31(4):341.
Carter B. Carter book. In: Carter B, Levetown M, eds. Palliative Care
for Infants, Children and Adolescents. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2004.
City of Hope. City of Hope/Palliative Care Resource Center at.
www.cityofhope.org/prc.
Continuing education for professionals at www.painedu.org. Dannemiller Memorial Education Foundation at www.pain.com. Dworkin R, Breitbart W, eds. Psychosocial Aspects of Pain: A Handbook
for Health Care Providers. Seattle: International Association for the
Study of Pain Press; 2004. End-of-Life Nursing Education Consortium (ELNEC): ELNEC
Pediatric Palliative Care Training Program—a comprehensive national pro-
gram to improve end-of-life care for neonatal and pediatric patients at www.
aacn.nche.edu/ELNEC.
Field M, Behrman R. When Children Die: Improving Palliative and
End-of-Life Care for Children and their Families. Washington, DC:
Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press; 2004. Finley GA, McGrath P, eds. Acute and Procedure Pain in Infants and Children.
Seattle, WA: International Association for the Study of Pain Press; 2003. Folk LA. Guide to capillary heelstick blood sampling in infants. Adv
Neonatal Care. 2007;7(4):171. Gardner SL. Non-pharmacologic interventions for neonatal pain:
evidence-based nursing practice. Nurse Currents. 2011;5:1.
Available at: www.anhi.org. Free continuing education credits. Gregory GA, Andropoulos DB. Gregory’s Pediatric Anesthesia. 5th ed.
Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blaclwell; 2011.
Harrison D, Reszel J, Dagg B, et al. Pain management during
newborn screening: using YouTube to disseminate effective pain management strategies. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2017;31(2):172.
Harrison D, Larocque C, Reszel J, Harrold J, Aubertin C. Be Sweet to
Babies during Painful Procedures: a pilot evaluation of a parent-tar­geted video. Adv Neonatal Care. 2017;17(5):372.
McCaffery M, Pasero C. Pain: Clinical Manual. 2nd ed. St Louis, MO:
Mosby; 1999.
McGrath P, Finley GA, eds. Pediatric Pain: Biological and Social
Context. Seattle, WA: International Association for the Study of Pain Press; 2003.
Meldrum M, e d. Opioids and Pain Relief: A Historical Perspective. Seattle,
WA: International Association for the Study of Pain Press; 2003.
Mogil J, ed. The Genetics of Pain. Seattle, WA: International
Association for the Study of Pain Press; 2004.
Partners for Understanding Pain at www.theacpa.org or
1-800-533-3231. Pediatric Pain Sourcebook at http://painsourcebook.ca/index.html. Stellwagen L, Wang M. Local Analgesia for Neonatal Circumcision.
[video] Boston: Massachusetts General Hospital; 2000. Available at:
www.aap.org/bookstore.
Walden M, Jorgensen KM. Developmental care CNE Module 20—
pain assessment and nonpharmacologic management, Chicago, IL:
National Association of Neonatal Nurses; 2011. Available at: www.
nann.org/store/product-details?productid=266. Accessed date: 10
February 2018. Zeller B, Giebe J. Pain in the neonate: focus on nonpharmacologic
interventions. Neonatal Netw. 2014;33(6):336.
THE NEONATE AND THE
https://t.me/medicina_free
ENVIRONMENT IMPACT
13
or centuries, the newborn baby has been considered a tabula rasa—a blank slate on
F
which parents and the world “write” to create the individual. In the first half of the 20th centu­ry, research emphasized the contributions of the environment in shaping the infant and child. Only recently has the individuality of the infant been recognized as a powerful shaper of the caregiver, the care given, and thus the environment.
This chapter explores the psychosocioemotional
development of term and preterm neonates. Infant
development is a reflection of the dynamic relationship between endowment and environ­ment. Understanding of the dynamic relationship
between endowment and environment is enhanced by a review of the principles of development in Box
13.1. First, the developmental tasks of infancy are
presented, along with the influences of endowment and environment on mastery. Home and family life, in which most infants are raised, is then contrasted with the experiences of babies in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Intervention strategies to normalize the NICU environment also are pre­sented, along with strategies for parent teaching. The developmental and social outcomes of infants exposed to the NICU are then presented.
ON DEVELOPMENT
SANDRA L. GARDNER AND EDWARD GOLDSON
DEVELOPMENTAL TASKS OF THE NEONATE AND INFANT
Neonates begin extrauterine life able to attend with their sensory capabilities, communicate with their environment through a complex repertoire
of behaviors, and store remembrances. Infancy (birth to 12 months) is the time of further develop­ment and maturation of these capabilities through self-mastery and adaptation to the extrauterine environment.
Biorhythmic Balance: The Primary Developmental Task of Newborns
In utero, the fetus depends on the mother’s physi­ologic systems to regulate its own systems. At birth, the neonate’s basic physiologic needs (i.e., feeding, elimination, cleaning, heat balance, stroking, com­municating) are met in new and different ways. The process of emerging from a physiologically dependent state as a fetus into a physiologically independent neonate introduces new variables for both mother and infant in the development of their extrauterine relationship.
The primary task of newborns is to establish independent biorhythmic balance by stabilizing the function of sleep-wake cycles, respiratory and heart rates, blood chemistry levels, meta­bolic processes, and eating patterns. Biorhythmic
balance is the establishment of innate, cyclic recur­rence of biologic functions. Although biorhythmic
balance is internally determined, caregiving inter­action between newborn and parent or caregiver either facilitates or disturbs this transition.
birth, this balance is facilitated by contact with famil­iar surroundings (the mother’s body) (see Chapter 5).
When immediate recontact between the neo­nate and the mother is not possible (e.g., when the mother refuses or is ill) or when the neonate is
334
After
BLUE type highlights content that is particularly applicable to clinical settings.
334
CHAPTER 13 The Neonate and the Environment Impact on Development
https://t.me/medicina_free
335
BOX
13.1
• Development is a continuous process of increasing complexity from
• Growth (i.e., number and size of cells) and development are influ-
• Development occurs in an orderly sequence largely determined by
• The sequence of development is the same in all children; the rate of
• Development is cephalocaudad (head→foot), centripetal (from
• The first 5 years are marked by a rapid period of growth of all body
• Environmental stimulation influences conceptual development and
• Learning occurs when behavioral change does not result solely from
• Development of the infant occurs within the framework of interaction
• Equifinality postulates multiple paths to the same developmental
Modified from Barnard K, Erikson M. Teaching Children With Developmental Problems. 2nd ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 1976; Illingworth RS. The Development of the Infant and the Young Child. 5th ed. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill-Livingstone; 1972.
PRINCIPLES OF DEVELOPMENT
conception to maturation (i.e., development also occurs in utero).
enced by genetic traits and environmental experiences.
readiness or maturation.
development is individual.
the outside toward the center), and from gross to specific (e.g., peripheral→central→lateralization).
systems. During this time, behavior patterns are developed and are greatly influenced by the environment.
has an effect on cognitive function.
maturation; learning is facilitated by reinforcement of the behavior through experience.
with a caregiver and the family.
outcome: complex developmental patterns rather than simple devel­opment milestones.
preterm or sick and requires immediate emergency medical intervention or transport, the primary “mothering” role is temporarily transferred to professional (medical and nursing) care providers. Interactional dynamics necessary for reestablishing biorhythmic balance and fostering the psychoso­cioemotional development of the newborn also are transferred into the NICU.
Just as in a home or family setting, the infant’s personality and behavioral development are affected by the nature and dynamics of the stimuli and relationships encountered with the staff in a nursery or NICU setting. The level of func­tion or dysfunction in the biorhythmic balance affects the neonate’s long-range outcomes and is interwoven with the development of a sense of self and a basic trust.
Sense of Self
In utero, the fetus has continuous tactile-kinesthetic stimulation that contributes to the development and maturation of the central nervous system (CNS) and establishes kinesthesis as the most natural path­way for growth and development. The interaction between infants and the extrauterine environment also is kinesthetic. However, tactile contact and vestibular stimulation are also essential for (1) the development of a physical identity (body image), (2) organization and sorting of stimuli, (3) coordination of sensorimotor skills, (4) a psychological and social sense of self, (5) normal neurophysiologic devel­opment (physical and cognitive abilities), and (6) emotional stability and temperament.
Daily caregiving and interactions such as feeding, diapering, holding, and playing with the parent or caregiver provide infants with recipro­cal stimuli for further developing their identity. Through the manner in which the infant is han­dled, he or she receives messages about how the caregiver feels about him or her.
Response cues given by an infant affect the care­giver’s response to and interaction with the infant.52 As the infant quiets in response to caregiving, the parent is positively reinforced to continue nurturing and soothing behavior. Withdrawal, irritability, or continuous crying is perceived by the caregiver as rejection or inadequacy and may result in parental frustration, depression, withdrawal, and decreased interaction. Repeated exposure to the caregiver’s style and nonverbal messages thus enables the infant to adapt to these patterns of caregiving. The self
of the infant is formed through interaction with people and objects within the environment.
Because the nature (amount and type) of the kinesthetic interaction between infants and care­givers influences how infants develop and mature, a lack of appropriate stimulation can have long­term negative consequences. Stimulus deprivation
results in impairment or retardation of, or devi­ancy in, skill development for productive liv­ing. The degree or extent of impairment depends
on the severity of the restrictions and limitations encountered.
52,392
Institutionally reared infants who had minimal contact and no social interaction with their caregivers displayed significant developmen­tal delays.
344
The effect of kinesthetic deprivation
was seen in the minimal expression of social skills
52
UNIT TWO Support of the Neonate336
https://t.me/medicina_free
(e.g., cooing, babbling, crying), minimal interest in objects in the environment, increased self-stimu­lation (rocking), touch aversion, flat or withdrawn affect, and retarded mental and motor development.
Environmental deprivation may also affect the physical growth of the infant. Montagu
287
stated that infants can overcome mental and nutritional deprivation as long as they are not deprived of tac­tile stimulation.
The Psychosocial Task: Trust Versus
Mistrust
Trust versus mistrust in self and the environment is solidified during infancy.
the environment from the moment of birth is the means through which neonates continue to develop trust in themselves and decide on the reliability of their new environment. Two major factors influ-
ence the development of trust versus mistrust: (1) the infant’s ability to communicate needs to the environment and (2) the reliability and con­tingency of the responding environment.
In the course of routine caregiving, an infant associates the caregiver with either comfort and trust or lack of need satisfaction and mistrust. The infant cries to communicate a need (e.g., “I’m hungry”; “I’m wet”). The caregiver responds to the infant and meets the need—the infant is fed; the diaper is changed. Thus, the newborn learns to communicate when the need arises again, because the environment or caregiver has responded and will respond. This contingent response of the care-
giver to the infant’s need is the necessary rein­forcement for the development of trust in self, others, and ultimately humankind. As a result, the
infant develops a sense of mastery over his or her world and a sense that it is okay to experience needs and that they will be met.
Caregiving that ignores or delays needs grat­ification is noncontingent on the infant’s cues for care. Need meeting that is externally defined by
the caregiver’s agenda (e.g., feeding schedule, rigid or inflexible routines, medical or nursing procedures in the NICU) discourages the infant from being aware of and experiencing needs and communicat­ing them. Such infants eventually detach themselves (emotionally and kinesthetically) from the sensation of their needs, thus no longer experiencing or com­municating them.
122
52,122
The response of
53
As a result, these infants conclude that they and their needs (which they perceive as one and the same) are not important and that they have no effect on their environment. They do not cultivate their sense of self or their own existence, physically (where their boundaries end and another’s begin) or psychologically (their identity, which exists inde­pendent of another).
Survival depends on the caregiver’s meeting the newborn’s needs. Need meeting is either con­tingent on the infant’s cues or noncontingent on an external agenda. The degree of the mother’s
emotional investment and connectedness with the newborn will determine the nature and quality of the caregiving. Likewise, the temper-
ament and responsiveness of the infant will affect the mother’s feelings of competence, success, and emotional connectedness to her infant.53 This relationship facilitates the ongoing development of a good sense of self (e.g., esteem, confidence, emotional security) and mastery of the world.
Caregivers who do not perceive infants as indi­viduals do not respond to their “need cry” or interact with them during caregiving. This style
fosters the development of mistrusting, suspicious, helpless, emotionally insecure, and isolated chil­dren and adults.
ENDOWMENT
Infants possess innateness and individuality. Primitive
reflex behaviors, higher cognitive abilities, temperament, and sensorimotor competencies are the endowment of the individual infant.
Individual variation and use of these endowments are influenced by the environment of the newborn.
Even before conception, the genetic endowment of the parents and preceding generations affects the fetus or newborn. Everything that the individual will inherit from his or her parents is determined at the moment of conception. Of the vast number of possible combinations of chromosomes, chance determines which characteristics the individual receives. Thus each individual, except monozygotic twins, is genetically and biologically different from every other person. Either a faulty gene (e.g., sickle cell anemia) or an altered number of chromosomes (e.g., Down syndrome) is responsible for inherited defects (see Chapter 27).
CHAPTER 13 The Neonate and the Environment Impact on Development
https://t.me/medicina_free
337
Although after the moment of conception, hereditary endowment can never be changed, it is influenced by the intrauterine environ­ment. Some birth defects are caused by terato-
gens or poisons—any environmental agent (e.g., drugs, virus, chemical, pollutant) that interferes with normal fetal development. An individual’s potential for growth and development is strongly influenced by his or her genetic endowment. As Montagu
287
stated, “Genetic endowment deter­mines what we can do—environment what we do do.”
The exact influence of genetics for most psy­chological traits is unknown. Introverted (timid, shy, withdrawn) and extroverted (active, friendly, outgoing) personality types may be partially geneti­cally controlled. The degree to which intelligence is inherited is currently unknown, although the intel­ligence of children is most often similar to paren­tal intelligence (i.e., intelligence is more similar between child and biologic mother than between child and adoptive mother).
Freedman
145
studied newborns of many eth­nic groups to determine whether there were any similarities in disposition within the group or dif­ferences from other ethnic groups. He found that Chinese American newborns were more adaptable, less irritable, and easier to console than white American newborns. Maneuvers such as the Moro and covering the face with a cloth elicited differ­ent responses, depending on the newborn’s ethnic origin.
The same environmental stimuli elicit different behavioral responses, which are individual and genetically influenced. These genetically influ­enced behaviors are also influenced by envi­ronment—both internal and external. Thus, an individual may be more vulnerable to or more resilient in a specific environment. Therefore, we are totally endowment and totally environment (100% endowment + 100% environment = an individual).
145
Temperament
qualities enable the following three basic types of infants to be identified:
• The “easy” child, who is seen as regular, pleasant, and easy to care for and love
• The “difficult” child, who is difficult to rear and reacts with protest and withdrawal to strange events or people
• The “slow to warm” child, who reacts with withdrawal or passivity to new events
Neurologic Development
Brain growth of the fetus and newborn occurs in two stages.
STAGE I
Stage I is from 10 to 18 weeks of pregnancy. The
number of nerve cells that the individual has develops during this period. Any environmental
perturbation (e.g., maternal malnutrition, medica­tions, infections) that affects brain growth during this stage also may affect neonatal behavioral responses.
STAGE II
Stage II is from 20 weeks’ gestation to 2 years of age. This period marks a brain growth spurt and is the most vulnerable period of growth of the dendrites of the human cortex.
The maturity of an infant is reflected in his or her behavior. Infants of a younger gestational age have less mature responses than infants of an older gestational age. A neurologic assessment of the new­born includes evaluation of (1) newborn reflexes, (2) neonatal states, (3) psychosocial interaction, and (4) sensory capabilities. The neonate is born with behaviors that are unlearned, instinctual, and of an adaptive and survival nature. They reflect the state of the nervous system and the level of neonatal mat­uration (Table 13.2). Serial testing of reflex behav- ior gives more reliable data than one observation. Observations indicative of major deviations include asymmetry—total absence or no response on one side or in upper versus lower extremities.
109
Parents often notice behavioral differences in their children from the first day. These differences are obvious in motor activity, irritability, and passivity. Some infants are quiet and placid, others are irri­table and easily upset, and others are somewhere in between (Table 13.1). These temperamental
Psychological Interaction and Neonatal States
For years, newborn behavior was thought to occur only on a reflexive, instinctual level. Through the work of Brazelton57 and
UNIT TWO Support of the Neonate338
https://t.me/medicina_free
TABLE
13.1
TEMPERAMENTAL QUALITY RATING
Activity level Low—Decreased movement when dressed or during sleep
Rhythmicity Regular—Establishes own feeding; sleep and bowel movement patterns are fairly predictable
Approach and withdrawal Positive—Eagerly tries new foods, interested in new surroundings and people
Adaptability Adaptive—Little resistance to first bath; may enjoy bath
Quality of mood Positive—Pleasant, easygoing disposition; easy to comfort; smiles
Intensity of mood Mild—No crying when wet; frets instead of crying when hungry
Sensory threshold (intensity of stimulus necessary to elicit a response)
Distractibility Distractible—Rocking, pacifier, toy, voice, music decrease fussing
Attention span and persistence
Data from Thomas A, Chess S. Temperament and Development. New York: Brunner-Mazel; 1977.
CRITICAL FINDINGS
Behavioral Categories Descriptive of Individual Temperament
High—Increased movement when asleep; increased wiggling and activity when diaper changed
Irregular—Amounts of sleep, feeding variable; “no 2 days are alike”; no pattern established
Negative—Rejects new foods, new toys, and new environments; apprehensive, cries with new people
Nonadaptive—Startles easily; resists diapering, bathing, and other manipulating
Negative—Fussy; cries easily and is not easily comforted by external stimuli; unable to comfort self easily
Intense—Vigorously cries; rejects food High—Not startled or interested by noise or other stimuli
Low—Noise, activity, or other stimuli enough to interrupt infant’s behavior
Nondistractible—No stimuli decrease distress until need is met—food; stop changing diaper; bath over Short—Cries when awakened but stops immediately, mild objection if needs are not immediately met
Long—Repeatedly rejects substitutions for perceived needs (no pacifier until diaper is changed; no water if
milk is wanted)
TABLE
13.2
BEHAVIOR BEGINS (IN UTERO) (WK) INTEGRATES
CRITICAL FINDINGS
Neonatal Reflex Behaviors
Protection
Moro reflex 28 At 6–8 mo to allow sitting and protective extension of the hands Palmar grasp 28 At 5–6 mo to allow voluntary grasping of objects Plantar grasp 28 At 7–8 mo with foot rubbing on objects; complete at 8–9 mo for standing and walking Babinski reflex 28 Same as for plantar grasp Tonic neck reflex 35 At 4 mo, so rolling over and reaching or grasping may occur Gaga reflex 36 Protects against aspiration—does not disappear Blink reflex 25 Does not disappear Crossed extension 28 Disappears around 2 mo of age
Survival
a
Rooting
a
Sucking
a
Swallowing
a
Although isolated components of feeding behaviors are all present before 28 weeks’ gestational age, they are not effectively coordinated for oral feedings before 32–34 weeks’ gestational
154,278,378
age.
Coordination of respiration with sucking and swallowing during bottle feeding is consistently achieved by infants more than 37 weeks’ postconceptual age.
28 At 3 mo; decreased response if baby is sleepy or satiated 26–28 Not yet synchronized with swallowing 12 32–34 wk, stronger synchronization with sucking; perfect by 34–37 wk
63