Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_37_библиотеки_им_акад_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
15.09.2026
Размер:
17 Мб
Скачать
☆
CHAPTER 13 The Neonate and the Environment Impact on Development
https://t.me/medicina_free
FIGURE 13.4 Premature infant hypotonic resting posture exhibiting the W configuration of arms, frog-leg position of the legs, abducted hips,
externally rotated ankles, everted feet, and asymmetric head position. This position promotes positional deformities and developmental gaps and delays. (From Hunter J. The neonatal intensive care unit. In: Case-Smith J, ed. Occupational Therapy for Children. 4th ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby, 2001.)
369
BOX
13.10
1. Inhibits or shortens dystonic phase while infant remains in fetal
2. Facilitates hand-to-midline and midline orientation
3. Stimulates visual exploration of environment (through head to midline)
4. Facilitates development of head control (making feeding easier and
5. Helps balance flexors and extensors to facilitate symmetric
6. Helps develop antigravity movement
7. Enhances comfort and decreases stress
8. Has an organizing effect that facilitates development of flexor tone
9. Promotes normal and prevents abnormal development
10. Helps enhance development of motor skills, reflexes, and postural
From Pelletier-Sehnar JM, Palmeri A. High-risk infants. In: Pratt PN, Allen AS, eds. Occupational Therapy for Children. 2nd ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 1989.
REASONS FOR PROPER POSITIONING
position during postnatal period
helping respiratory problems)
288,297,370
posture
297,370
tone
112
112
112
112,370
ventilation or CPAP) had their end-expiratory levels and ventilation distribution measured at 30 minutes, 2 hours, and 4 hours after repositioning.
186
The three body positions used during the study were prone, quarter turn from prone, and supine.
Spontaneously breathing infants had better ven­tilation homogeneity 2 hours after repositioning and global end-expiratory levels at 4 hours. Infants receiving both CPAP and mechanical ventilation had improved ventilation homogene­ity at 2 hours after repositioning that continued to be maintained at 4 hours. Those infants on CPAP had an improved global end-expiratory level at 2 hours after repositioning.
Side-lying is used to improve visual aware­ness of hands, encourage hands-to-midline movement, and discourage the frog-leg position. In this position, the infant can bring the hands to the mouth for sucking and self-comforting.
Side-lying is best maintained with swaddling or commercial positioning devices rather than single blanket rolls (Fig. 13.5). Position extremities so that the bottom arm is in a comfortable position and the upper shoulder and hip are slightly forward of the weight-bearing lower hip or shoulder, provide a small roll (e.g., folded cloth diaper or washcloth or small bean-stuffed toy), and bundle for security but not so that the upper extremity compromises chest expansion. Alternating sides reduces head mold­ing and may prevent atelectasis of the dependent lung. The head and trunk should be maintained in neutral alignment (e.g., the head and trunk are in
UNIT TWO Support of the Neonate370
https://t.me/medicina_free
FIGURE 13.5 Small preterm infant in side-lying position supported in flexion and with a midline orientation of the extremities. (From
Hunter J. The neonatal intensive care unit. In: Case-Smith J, ed. Occupational Therapy for Children. 4th ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby, 2001.)
the same vertical plane). The left lateral position
has been shown to improve oxygenation, lung mechanics, and breathing patterns in preterm infants, similar to the benefits of prone position-
159
ing.
However a recent study showed that lateral
positioning of preterm infants (median gestational
age of 28.6 weeks) receiving nasal CPAP resulted
in increased respiratory rates.
460
Left lateral posi­tion reduces gastroesophageal reflux, whereas right lateral position reduces gastric residuals.
118
Longer
sleep duration and less wakefulness in preterm infants occur when they are positioned flexed in the lateral position compared to lateral positioning
without flexion.
421
To accommodate their ventilators, umbilical catheters, and other devices, acutely ill preterm infants may be positioned supine; the preterm neo­nate’s head should be in the midline. Positioning VLBW infants supine with their heads turned to either side causes mechanical obstruction of cerebral venous return and alters cerebral blood flow, which may contribute to the development of intraventric­ular hemorrhage (IVH).
330
Cerebral (and mesen­teric) tissue oxygenation was recently measured in clinically stable VLBW infants in two supine posi­tions (i.e., with head tilted up 30 degrees and lying flat) and prone (lying flat).
103
Regardless of position these stable VLBW infants were able to maintain stable cerebral and mesenteric tissue oxygenation, both before and after feeding.
103
Supine positioning does not promote flexion
and may be stressful to acutely ill infants. Earlier
studies found an increase in apnea, bradycardia, and periodic breathing in supine positioning, although a more recent study of 22 preterm infants with apnea and bradycardia found no significant differ­ence in the incidence of clinically significant events between supine and prone positioning.
202
Placed supine, infants exhibit more startle behaviors, agi­tation, motor disorganization, calorie expenditure, and sleep disturbance (higher number of arousals/
284
hour)
from environmental stimuli.
Prolonged supine positioning is associated with the hypertonic “arched” position (hyper­extension of head, neck, and shoulder girdle) of many chronically ventilated infants (Fig. 13.6) .
Use of a gel or water pillow under the infant’s head and neck (e.g., to the nipple level to prevent neck flexion or used as a mattress under the head or body of a VLBW infant) provides comfort and maintains neutral alignment.
Supine positioning should promote as much flexion as possible. Use of a positioning device
of foam with the middle cut out and sloping under the scapulae is another method of obtaining supine flexion. Use of hip support results in less lower extremity abduction and external rotation than in infants without such hip support. Pillows filled with polystyrene beads (i.e., preterm bean­bags) require skill for optimal positioning and
CHAPTER 13 The Neonate and the Environment Impact on Development
https://t.me/medicina_free
FIGURE 13.6 Supine positioning without positioning supports results in motor disorganization, agitation, arching posture, and burning
of significant calories. (From Hunter J. The neonatal intensive care unit. In: Case-Smith J, ed. Occupational Therapy for Children. 4th ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby, 2001.)
371
close infant monitoring but are useful in provid­ing positioning for very small premature infants (1000–1500 g).
Body containment increases the infant’s feeling of security, promotes quieting and self-control, enhances physiologic stability, promotes energy conservation, reduces physiologic and behavioral stress, and enables stress to be better endured.
402
Without positional supports, many premature infants “travel” (no matter how many times they are returned) to the sides or bottom of their incubator. Parents and professionals are inclined to move the uncomfort­able-looking infant back to the middle of a “bound­ary-less” world. Infants should be left where they feel safe and comfortable; if they become uncomfortable, they will let you know. Providing boundaries (e.g.,
blanket rolls, positioning devices) stops this migration and the expenditure of precious calories that could go to growth. Use of a conformational positioning device that provides containment, boundaries, and security facilitates better sleep in preterm infants with less active awake time and crying when compared to a standard mattress.
216
Small, acutely ill premature infants who are posi­tioned supine are often extremely agitated, thrashing arms and legs, tachycardic, and expending precious energy and calories. Instead of needing medications, these infants often are calmed by providing a nest of blankets or a commercial nesting device (which simulates the boundaries and security of the uterus). This artificial womb must be closely surrounding the infant to promote flexion, security, and quiet
rest (Fig. 13.7). If agitation recurs, a limb (usually a leg) has extended outside the infant’s secure bound­ary; flexing and returning it to the “womb” quiets the infant.12 Nesting and swaddling premature
infants increases both total sleep and quiet sleep
2
time.
Body containment maneuvers such as swad­dling, holding on to a finger or hand, and cross­ing the infant’s arms in the midline and holding them securely help with self-regulation during feeding, procedures, or other stressful manipu­lations.91 A recent study of swaddling found wide
variation in the positioning of the neonate’s arms and legs.
140
Safe swaddling includes position-
ing the baby’s extremities in slight flexion and abduction. Placing an infant’s hips and knees in an
extended position with swaddling increases the risk of hip dysplasia and dislocation.
189
Because being wrapped in a blanket with extremities flexed simu­lates in utero position, swaddling (1) improves flexed posture and flexor muscle tone, (2) facilitates behav­ioral responses, and (3) improves the development of primitive reflexes. Swaddling is associated with a
small but significant risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) when infants are placed on their backs for sleep, and swaddled infants placed prone have the highest risk of SIDS. Swaddling
is used most often in young infants to reduce crying and should not be initiated in infants older than 4 months of age; it should cease when an infant attempts to turn over and be completely stopped by 6 months of age.
329
UNIT TWO Support of the Neonate372
https://t.me/medicina_free
FIGURE 13.7 Very small premature infant resting quietly in a “nest” of pads and blankets.
Picking up the preterm infant from a supine position often produces startles, apnea, or head hyper­extension. A better technique is to roll the infant prone, which flexes the head, and then flex the limbs onto the trunk and pick up the infant. If the infant has difficulty breathing in prone position, swaddle or contain the extremities before picking up the infant.
Prone positioning encourages the infant to work on using neck extension and promotes flexion of the extremities. Devices for prone positioning include a small hip roll or sling to assist in maintaining flexion, use of gel/water pillows for head support, and secure lower boundary for foot bracing. Use of a rolled cloth or gel pillow placed under the infant (from top of the head to the umbilicus) (1) provides elevation of the body to promote extremity flexion without placing excessive pressure on the knees and elbows, (2) enables the shoulders to round forward over the top of the roll, and (3) enables the legs to flex over the bottom edge of the roll. Prone (versus supine)
positioning has numerous benefits and is the position of choice for many NICU infants (Box
13.11). The semi-prone position (¾ turn) decreases
the variability of respiratory rate in preterm infants (median gestational age of 28.6 weeks) receiving nasal CPAP. been shown to improve oxygenation of premature infants on CPAP.
463
The quarter-prone position also has
420
To improve sleep duration
and quality, nurses are encouraged to assess each
BOX
13.11
1. Decreases heart rate variability
2. Improves oxygenation by 15% to 25% a. Increased TcPo2 values b. Increased Pao2 values c. Decreased apnea, bradycardia, and periodic breathing d. Increased peripheral oxygenation and decreases cerebral blood
e. Decreases respiratory rate
3. Improves lung mechanics and lung volumes a. Increased lung compliance b. Increased tidal volume
4. Decreases energy expenditure a. Increased quiet sleep; higher arousal threshold b. Decreased awake time; more sleep time c. Decreased caloric expenditure (median difference supine vs.
d. Decreased heat loss e. Less crying f. Lower levels of activity g. Lowers stress levels as measured by a reduction in salivary corti-
5. Decreases (by 50%) gastric residuals in the first 30 minutes after
6. Decreases gastroesophageal reflux
EFFECTS OF PRONE POSITIONING
37
flow
prone: + 3.1 kcal/kg/day)
77
69
sol levels
81
feeding
69
157
77
77
39,159,357
159,423
194
69,77,194,284
118
CHAPTER 13 The Neonate and the Environment Impact on Development
https://t.me/medicina_free
373
individual preterm and more often use the posi­tion (prone vs. supine) that results in the least arousals.
284
Sleeping in the prone position does
not improve oxygenation in preterms 32 weeks’ PMA or older for infants without respiratory problems. The study concluded that preterms older than 32 weeks’ PMA and without respiratory dif­ficulties should be placed supine and monitoring continued to ensure adequate oxygen saturation.
Use of a sheepskin or lambskin helps to further facil­itate flexion and prevents skin abrasion, especially on the knees.
Sleep Position. The most recent American Aca-
demy of Pediatrics (AAP) position statement on infant sleep states that healthy infants should be placed only in the supine position for sleep beginning immediately after birth.
294
Infants should sleep in their own beds and in the same room with their parents for at least 6 months and prefer­ably for the first year of life. Overheating sleeping infants; use of soft sleeping surfaces, stuffed toys, and positioning devices
418
; and inappropriate sleep envi­ronments (e.g., waterbeds, pillows, blankets, bumper pads, bed railings, bed sharing, and sitting/carrying devices) infants.
88,148,355,375
294
Use of a pacifier for sleep and sleeping
should all be avoided in healthy
in proximity (same room) as parents is also rec­ommended.
294
The Study of Attitudes and Factors Effecting Infant Care (SAFE) collected prospective data from a nationally representative sample of post­partum mothers about the intended sleep position and the actual positions infants were placed in for sleep.88 Although approximately 70% of the mothers queried usually placed their infants to sleep supine, less than 44% who intended to use supine position actually placed their infants supine in actual practice.
African American mothers and mothers with less than a high school education were more likely to intend to use prone or side-lying position.
When advised by a doctor to use only supine posi­tioning, mothers were less likely to use prone and side-lying for infant sleep.
88
Use of side-lying and prone positioning, as well as containment with soft bedding for physiolog­ically compromised term and preterm infants, is safe and appropriate in a NICU setting. Parents may question these practices; therefore, their phys­iologic base and rationale should be explained.
Parents should be taught that when their baby is medically stable, by 32 weeks’ PMA,
294
he
or she will be physiologically and developmen­tally mature enough to tolerate supine sleep position in preparation for discharge.
232
Many
of the beneficial effects of prone positioning listed in Box 13.11 are no longer necessary
232
and become detrimental in increasing the risk for SIDS in the stable, mature preterm infant.
Since the “Back to Sleep” campaign, the rate
of SIDS has decreased by 53%,
294
but the SIDS rate in the United States (US) has minimally declined since 1999, and approximately 3500 sleep-related deaths occur in the US each year.
49,121
SIDS rates
are inversely associated with gestational age, and the risk of SIDS is three times higher in preterm infants.
168,315
VLBW infants (<1500 g),
the group at highest risk for SIDS, have been found in one study to be more likely to sleep prone after discharge than larger LBW infants.
428
Reasons cited by mothers included infant’s prefer­ence and advice from professionals (NICU doctors, nurses) who may remain uncomfortable recom­mending supine sleep in this population
232,428
despite the AAP recommendations and the research that supports them
294
(Table 13.9). Among families with triplets and quadruplets, less than 80% of mothers used supine for sleep immediately after hospital dis­charge; use of supine positioning decreased over time, especially during daytime napping; 30% shared a bed with siblings; less than 50% slept in the parents’ room; and use of a pacifier was low.
167
Implementing “Safe Sleep” (“Back to Sleep”) principles in the NICU remains a problem and influences parental behavior.
32,300,328
One study found that NICU nurses only followed safe sleeping practices 20% of the time before an evidence-based program promoting safe sleep began; after the implementation of the program safe sleep practices were used 90% of the time.
461
Nursing education with web-based learning and in-person teaching sessions improved compliance in safe sleep practices in two level III NICUs from 25.0% to 79.7%.
187
Another project to develop a safe sleep educational program and increase the percentage of eligible infants in a safe sleep environment in the NICU was conducted.
435
The process included a revised policy, educational updates for NICU staff, an educational packet and video for families, a wearable blanket, and an observation checklist. From a baseline of 21% of eligible NICU infants experiencing a safe sleep environment, safe sleep compliance increased to 88%.
435
Quality-improvement initiatives that
UNIT TWO Support of the Neonate374
https://t.me/medicina_free
TABLE
13.9
SUPINE PRONE
Preterm infants at 36–38 wk PCA No significant difference in sleep organization based on body position More awakenings in supine vs. prone position Standard deviations of heart rate increase during quiet sleep in supine
More sleep transitions, a lower arousal threshold, and higher heart rate
Full-term (n = 10) infants in prone/supine sleep positions given 0.4 mL water; instillation into the mouth resulted in airway protective responses of swallowing (95%) and arousal (54%)
Swallow rate rapid in supine position in response to small infusions of fluid, whereas respiratory rate remains largely unaffected When supine, term infants can coordinate rapid swallowing while maintaining breathing
Full-term (n = 3240) ≥37 wk GA evaluated in the first 24 hr of life for frequency/severity of spitting up incidents while asleep
• 96.6% did not spit up during sleep.
• 130 episodes of spitting up while sleeping supine (55%
• <4% spit up while sleeping supine, and none required
SLEEP POSITION AS A RISK FACTOR FOR SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME (SIDS): RESEARCH BASIS
157
position; low frequency and high frequency of heart rate higher in supine vs. prone position in both active and quiet sleep states
variability while sleeping supine contribute to decreased vulnerability to SIDS
195
400
:
required no intervention; 37% brief bulb suction; 6% gentle stimulation; 2% wall suction).
significant intervention or experienced serious sequelae.
Prone position reduces spontaneous arousals from sleep in term infants,
First quiet sleep after feedings significantly longer, fewer awakenings, and decrease in overall heart rate variability in prone vs. supine Preceding characteristics of prone sleep constitute a higher arousal threshold, and thus increased vulnerability to SIDS in prone position Decreased baroreflex sensitivity, which increases vulnerability to hypotensive events
62 healthy, growing low BW infants (26–37 wk GA; 750–1600 g BW); sleeping position—a shift of EEG activity toward slower frequency,
A significant decrease in swallowing and breathing in active sleep in prone vs. supine position; airway protection is compromised in prone sleeping
Six episodes of spitting up while infants side-lying (66.7% no intervention;
33.3% bulb suction)
322,356
which may be related to a decrease in cerebral oxygen-
ation in prone sleeping
which may be related to mechanisms associated with a decrease in behavioral arousal in prone position
position during active sleep in healthy term infants exposed to minute pharyngeal fluid
456
157,356
322,356,456
459
356,366
BW, Birth weight; GA, gestational age; EEG, electroencephalogram; PCA, postconceptual age.
identify barriers, change hospital policies, and pro­vide safe sleep education for nurses and parents are needed to improve compliance with safe sleep rec­ommendations for preterm infants.
In term infants, supine sleep position may delay some motor milestones by 1 month but does not delay walking. Increased amounts of time in super­vised prone play (“tummy time”) encourage earlier motor milestone attainment in supine sleepers and helps prevent head molding. Head molding (i.e., bilateral flattening of the head and elongation of the face) is a significant problem in preterm infants; it results from flattening of the skull as the baby lies against the firm incubator mattress. To parents, this head flattening is concerning, and they may find the infant less cute and desirable than a term infant with a rounded head. To prevent head molding,
300
preterm infants are often placed on waterbeds, water pillows, air mattresses, or eggcrate-type mattresses, with varying results. Preterm infants
(<32 weeks’ gestation with birth weight <1500 g) who are turned every 3 hours, repositioned in one of six positions, and never placed in the same posi­tion twice in 8 hours had significantly rounder head shapes from 9 to 13 weeks of life compared with infants repositioned according to a standard NICU procedure.
179
Kinesthetic. A combination of vestibular and
tactile stimulation increases quieting behaviors, decreases apneic and bradycardic episodes, entrains respirations, increases visual and audi­tory fixation, and increases brain growth.
210
Waterbeds provide contingent stimuli because
CHAPTER 13 The Neonate and the Environment Impact on Development
https://t.me/medicina_free
375
they move in response to the infant’s movement; oscillating waterbeds provide rhythmic motion. Kinesthetic stimulation is provided by rocking chairs, hammocks, baby swings, and baby carriers, the effects of which have not been investigated. In Brazil, a combination tactile/kinesthetic stimula­tion program enrolling 16 clinically stable preterm infants under 2500 g was conducted and compared with a control group of 16 preterms.
133
Outcomes of the preterms receiving the tactile/kinesthetic program included (1) higher daily weight gain, (2) predominance of self-regulated behaviors (i.e., regular respirations, balanced tone, state of alert­ness, range of postures, coordinated movements, hand-to-mouth movement control, suction, grip, and support), and (3) a trend toward shorter length
133
of stay.
An RCT of parent-administered physical therapy (promotion of head and postural control and midline orientation) to preterm infants from 34 to 36 weeks PMA resulted in improved motor performance at 37 weeks PMA when compared to usual care.
419
Upright positioning in a car seat or infant seat encourages symmetry and spatial orientation. Soft rolls or foam padding maintains flexion; a rolled blanket in a horseshoe configuration around the infant’s head and shoulders prevents lateral slouch­ing. Carrying quiets the infant, provides sensory communication with the caregiver, changes the infant’s environment, and provides visual, auditory, and tactile stimuli. A nasal cannula (see Chapter
23) and portable tank enable mobility for an infant
receiving oxygen.
Rather than standardized protocols, tactile inter­ventions must be individualized by assessing each infant’s physiologic and behavioral responses before, during, and after touch (see Table 13.6) . While an
infant is acutely ill, tactile intervention should include minimal handling, containment, and gentle touch (without stroking). As the infant
matures and becomes physiologically stable, strok­ing, rocking, and holding are integrated based on the individual infant’s tolerance and preferences. In healthy preterm infants, a program of range-of­motion exercises with passive resistance is associated with an increase in weight gain and growth, bone mineral content and density, and muscle mass and a decreased risk for osteopenia.
Cobedding. Cobedding, the practice of placing
239,430
medically stable twins and higher-order multiples
together in the same open warmer, incubator, or crib, was initiated after the observed stress response in separated siblings. The practice of cobedding
spread based on anecdotal information, because there is limited research to support or refute
219
its use.
Few differences between cobedded and noncobedded infants have been demonstrated. A study of 117 sets of twins randomized to cobed­ding or sleeping alone found that cobedding pro­moted self-regulation (i.e., more time in the same state, less time in opposite states, and less crying) and more quiet sleep without apparent increased
175
risk.
Limitations of the research on cobedding include small sample size, short follow-up periods, lack of randomization, and blinding of evaluators.
Infection, safety, and parents continuing the
practice after discharge are major concerns of cobedding. To date, increased infection rates in
cobedded infants have not been reported. Infection concerns are addressed by good hand washing and color-coding of equipment. Other safety concerns include proper identification for medication admin­istration and medical emergencies and maintenance of temperature stability for all cobedded infants.13 Because parents continue care practices at home that they have witnessed and become accustomed to in the hospital, the possibility of continuing cobedding at home (and the lack of evidence as to its safety) must be considered.
The National Association of Neonatal Nurses (NANN) recommends that a decision to cobed be made with input from parents and should involve education of staff and parents about potential ben­efits/risks, the experimental nature of the practice, and the development of a clinical evaluation proto­col to collect data on risks and benefits.
299
The AAP recommends separate sleep areas in the hospital and at home.
294
Both NANN
299
and the AAP
294
have
concluded that neither the safety or benefit of cobedding has been established by current research and that parents should be instructed to follow established safe sleeping practices at
294
home.
AUDITORY INTERVENTION
The NICU is a noisy environment that has no diurnal rhythm or predictability; it is as noisy at night as in the daytime (Table 13.10).
102,158,269
An infant in the NICU is exposed to an onslaught of noise 24 hours a day for days, weeks, or months. At follow-up, preterm infants exhibit a lower threshold
UNIT TWO Support of the Neonate376
https://t.me/medicina_free
for sound and a reduced responsiveness to auditory stimulation.31 Assisted ventilation, severe asphyxia, drug therapies, and possibly acoustic insult account for the increased risk for sensorineural hearing loss in NICU infants. The incidence of hearing loss
decreases with an increase in gestational age. An increased risk of hearing loss is associated with being born very preterm and late preterm.
180
Moderate to severe conductive hearing loss also occurs in 42% of VLBW infants. Conductive hear­ing loss is attributed to endotracheal intubation, poor eustachian tube function, increased otitis media, and CLD in preterm infants.
The first goal in auditory intervention is to assess the current level of noise in the NICU and decrease the noise decibel level wherever pos-
269,340
sible.
The noise environment of an individual infant depends on the type of NICU (single-family rooms or open-bay), ambient sounds in the nursery, the type of incubator and support equipment, and the baby’s own behavior (e.g., quiet or crying). Noise measurement protocols must sample multiple noise sources and sites.
102,269
Some NICUs have installed decimeters that present a flashing or blink­ing light when the noise level exceeds a preset level (about 50–65 dB). Sources of noise include heating, ventilation, and air conditioner flow units (noise levels may decrease by 2.5–10.5 dB when these units are turned off). The greatest contributor to
loud noise in the NICU is talking and conver­sation by the staff. Noise levels vary with type of
room, location, time of day, and day of week within the NICU; therefore various locations or various times and days should be measured.
102,269,340
Increased environmental noise levels are a stressor to all infants in the NICU—preterm infants and ill term infants (e.g., infants with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the new­born or drug withdrawal) (Box 13.12). The sudden,
high-pitched, shrill, dysrhythmic noise of equipment alarms alerts the care provider, but it also results in infants manifesting an extreme hypersensitivity to sound (as a learned conditioned response). CNS­injured preterms are particularly vulnerable to sound stress in the NICU, are less able to habituate to NICU noise, and respond with exaggerated and prolonged physiologic responses (e.g., alterations in respiratory rate, bradycardia, desaturations). Noise is
stressful not only to the infants but also to par­ents and care providers in the NICU.
38,176
Three
years after their NICU experience, mothers recall the
BOX
13.12
• Increase in stress behaviors:
• State lability
• Arousal state
• Avoidance behaviors—more fussy, more startles, etc. (see Table
• Sympathetic nervous system arousal measured by noninvasive
• Decrease in approach behaviors (see Table 13.4)
• Cardiorespiratory changes:
• Increased heart rate
• Increased respiratory rate
• Increased apnea or bradycardia
• Increased hypoxemia (decreased pulse oximeter)
• Increased peripheral and arterial vasoconstriction:
• Increased systemic blood pressure
• Increased intracranial pressure
• Increased sensory neural hearing loss
• Abnormal auditory development and processing
• Prevents habituation
• Alters development of sleep-wake cycles:
• Disturbs sleep; interrupts light sleep
• Even moderate noise disturbs sleep
• Increases wakefulness and agitation
• Increased risk for intraventricular hemorrhage:
• Increase in cerebral blood flow
• No change in cerebral oxygenation when peak sound levels
EFFECTS OF LOUD NOISE
13.4)
skin conductance, which was higher in male preterms
increased by 5 dB for short duration; cerebral oxygenation at higher sound levels for longer durations unknown
368,436,452
119
noise level in the NICU as a stressor. NICU noise is stressful to care providers and has the potential to damage hearing; cause physiologic responses (e.g., increased blood pressure, altered immune response, increased stress hormone secretion, disturbed sleep); cause fatigue, irritability, and “burnout”; interfere with communication with coworkers and parents; alter concentration; and increase errors.
405
Although the AAP recommends that noise levels
be less than 45 dB,
448
most NICUs’ noise levels range between 38 and 90 dB, with higher noise bursts (see Table 13.10).* Recommended standards for noise criteria have been established to protect sleep, support stable vital signs, and improve speech
* References 71, 102, 147, 269, 340, 341
CHAPTER 13 The Neonate and the Environment Impact on Development
https://t.me/medicina_free
TABLE
13.10
NOISE LEVELS IN THE NICU
LEVEL (DB) COMMENTS
48–69 Humidifiers and nebulizers 50–60 Normal speaking voice
a,b
50–73.5
Incubator (motor noise) 53 Median noise level on conventional ventilator 55–88 58–85
c
Bradycardia alarm
Noise in NICU (talking, equipment alarms, telephones, radio) 59 Median noise level on high-frequency oscillator
b
65–80
Life support equipment (ventilator; intravenous pumps) 66–76 Sink on/off 67 Incubator alarm 70
72.8–71.7 74–89.2
d
85
Background noise mean level should not exceed
Air conduction noise levels of jet ventilator, CPAP
Bone conduction noise levels of jet ventilator, CPAP
Noise level at which hearing damage is possible for adult; (?) neonatal effects 90 Peak sound intensity in the NICU not to exceed
d
90
92.8
b
Adult exposure for 8 hours requires protective device and hearing conservation program
Opening incubator porthole 84–108 Placing a plastic bottle of formula on top of incubator
b
96–117 70–116 80–124
b
b
Placing a glass bottle of formula on top of incubator
Closing one or both cabinet doors
Closing one or both portholes 120 Threshold for pain
b
130–140 160–165
d
Banging incubator to stimulate apneic premature infant
Recommendations for peak, single noise level not to exceed to prevent (adult) hearing loss; (?) neonatal effects
377
201
201
a
Modern incubators generate less than 60 dB; exceeds hourly recommendation of 50 dBA (see Table 13.11).
b
Measures from inside the incubator.
c
Noise levels do not vary from morning to night.
d
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standard. (No safety standards for neonates have been established.) NICU, Neonatal intensive care unit. Data from Thomas KA, Uran A. How the NICU environment sounds to a preterm infant: update. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2007;32:250.
intelligibility. Recent noise studies in NICUs have found the following*:
• Noise levels are still louder than recommended.
• Environmental changes to reduce noise must be
monitored because they may increase rather than decrease noise.
* References 4, 67, 71, 80, 102, 269, 340
• Nurses perceived their own NICU as “pretty quiet” when, in fact, noise levels were above recommendations.
• Noise levels have not significantly decreased in the NICU.
• Single-room NICUs attenuate noise; there is more silence. However, equipment noise and noise from medical interventions is not decreased in single-room units. Parent engagement and presence is related to more language exposure.
UNIT TWO Support of the Neonate378
https://t.me/medicina_free
TABLE
13.11
NOISE CRITERION RATIONALE
Hourly Leq (equivalent sound level) of 45 dB in infant room; 50 dB in staff work areas
Hourly L10 of 50 dB in infant room; 55 dB in staff work areas (sound levels may exceed 55 dB only 10% of the time or a total of 6 min/h)
L
max
imum decibel sound level ≤1 sec in duration—transient bursts of noise)
RATIONALE FOR SPECIFIC NOISE CRITERIA
of 65 dB in infant room; not to exceed 70 dB in staff work areas (max-
448
Preserves sleep for healthy term infants most of the time
Preserves sleep for infants; enables caregivers to speak at normal conver­sational levels and be clearly understood 12 feet away, approximately 90% of the time
Minimizes rousing babies and causing startle responses
• Initial and continued staff education is necessary; monitoring and feedback every 2 to 3 months is necessary
• Quality-improvement initiatives including edu­cation and behavioral and environmental mod­ifications decrease noise in the NICU; constant dialogue between champions and staff is required.
Table 13.11 presents specific noise criteria and
their rationale. Parents and care providers must be
involved in planning, developing, and being edu­cated about quieter NICUs.
38,395
Strategies to minimize external auditory stimuli
include quieting alarms with suction (and remem­bering to reset them), not taking a shift report over or allowing medical rounds near the infant’s incubator, having noisy equipment repaired imme­diately, emptying sloshing water in ventilator or nebulizer tubing, maintaining cardiac monitors in a quiet state with alarms on (decreasing the sound of alarms by 50%), and purchasing quieter equipment (e.g., plastic instead of metal trash containers; qui­eter incubators). Choosing heated humidifiers (48 dB) rather than nebulizers (69 dB) and keeping the containers full of water, rather than low, decrease noise from respiratory equipment. Nursery design changes
448
include smaller cubicles rather than one large room, soundproofing materials, lights for phones and alarm systems, and minimizing equipment noise. Placing a blanket on top of the incubator or using an incubator cover muffles the noise of equipment placement; gentle, considerate (to the infant) placement of equipment on or in the
(by medical, nursing, or ancillary personnel) on the incubator Plexiglas should never be permit­ted. This (along with a brisk startle reflex from the
infant) is an opportunity to teach about the noise levels generated by such activity. Infants should be kept in incubators as long as necessary to maintain heat balance. Older incubators do not protect
the infant from noise. A well-managed NICU environment may be much quieter than the con­tinuous noise of an incubator. Noise in modern incubators varies according to the model. Sound
sources within an incubator include its motor, infant sounds, equipment sounds inside the incubator, equipment sounds transmitted from outside the incubator, and ambient nursing noise (e.g., person­nel, phones). Modern incubator walls attenuate
impulse noises from the NICU and may decrease the infant’s noise exposure. Inside modern incu-
bators, motor noise does not exceed 60 dB, but this level exceeds the more recent recommendation of 50 dB. However, impulse noises from the incubator (i.e., doors, latches) are louder on the inside of the incubator (see Table 13.10). Prolonged stays in an
incubator not only expose the infant to repeated caregiving noises but also mean there will be a dearth of kinesthetic stimulation (e.g., carrying, holding, rocking, swinging, sitting upright in an infant seat) and socially relevant speech patterns.
Both the internal noise generated by the incubator and how well the incubator attenuates external noise
should be considered in incubator purchases. incubator muffles sound; and closing portholes and drawers gently decrease the structural noises of care­giving. Prohibiting placement of equipment (e.g., clipboards, stethoscopes, formula bottles) on top of the incubator prevents such noises.
development of other sensory systems and delay the
development of hearing and language. Radios have
been banned in most NICUs. Day-night cycles
(naptime, nighttime) when auditory stimulation
Tapping (by parents or siblings) or banging
Noise levels in the NICU may interfere with