Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Суфийский теолого-философский синтез аль-Газали. Монография

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
08.09.2026
Размер:
2 Мб
Скачать
☆
of social life of man, enforcing legality, building a basis for «squabbling of science» detailing the basis for law enforcement and eventually reaching a new theorertical form such as ethico­legal systems. In all this, al-Ghazali never rejected the validity of common law and its necessity and he started safeguarding the right for justice. Obviously, his relationship towards fiqh corresponds to the church members of European free thinkers. He attempted to relieve some of fiqh’s power of compulsion, unite law and moral, logic with ethics, good intention and deeds, and the embodiment of justice in law. He longed that all regulation of legal motives to be surbodinated to one ideal principle, imperative to absolute truth, i.e. not make law an instrument in the hands of fakih which empowers the rich but rather a weapon for goodness. Likewise, kalam stopped to be a means for the defence of popular faith, but act as an ideology which functions as a required minimum, when moral decay arises, the members would turn and compensate for the preservation of «average level» of spiritual unity and prosperous shape. Thus al-Ghazali tried to soften and abolish doctrinal autoauthoritanism and fanatic schism among the prevailing schools.
For al-Ghazali, philosophy stopped to be a declarative medium «material of science» and sinless pillars of truth, and becomes «assembly of sciences» which were in unparalleled distances away from truth. Conclusions, which are arrived at by means of philosophy, are consireded as relative, voidable in the questions of «eternity» of being likewise in the mundane problems.
The criticism of al-Ghazali which was directed to Islamic philosphers was not a «destruction» of philosophy, but a continuation of tradition of antagonism between kalam and philosophy. This kind of criticism could not be completely free of sophistic elements as the later always is present in a considerable share whenever there is a critical instance. But sophistic mastery of al-Ghazali never manifested itself openly in his criticism. The criticism, which tended to substantiate his intellectual efforts with
421
the aim of defeating an opponent in a particular discussion, ended with the deprivation of usefulness of such an effort. The criticism of philosophy led to the destruction of the foundation of kalam exactly as it did to batanists, which had resulted to the idea of perniciousness of any spiritual subordination to the state or any other external forces. Stopping at the abyss of «damnation and excommunication» of philosophers, he excommunicated only himself to the gates of repetence. This repetence made a return to the initial experience of theorising, which included philosophy, as inevitable «conclusion of conclusions». It is true that philosophy at this time had ceased to have an independent status and became an essential part of his universal ideological alternative in all facets of thought.
Sufism did not reperesent the sacred top and the limit of knowledge, or a certain ideology of the future but a concrete, live participation of spirit while keeping in fidelity the rationalistic tradition of mind, he found the last refuge in sufism from the intrigues and unity of mind, his self-loving and arrogance of detachment from the unchanging world.
Thus ideal synthesis of al-Ghazali was not a mechanical result of connection of different disciplines but qualitatively new in its unity embodied in Sufi path.
What is essential in the synthesis of al-Ghazali is not the Law of faith, Path to faith or Truth of faith. That unity has remained one of the unacclaimed possibilities of revolutionizing of soul and social reformation, something, which was not recognized by his friends.
The originality of al-Ghazali’s synthesis is not its personal touch or its concretness but the growth from the islamic cultural sources, even so, its very source emanates from unity of knowledge and deeds, as a connection of moral words enjoined by equitable deeds
Different from other scholars of synthetic studies, al – Ghazali has left behind a heritage of systematic thought that ties and cements a beginning whose foundation certainly is ethics.
422
ИСПОЛЬЗОВАННАЯ ЛИТЕРАТУРА
1.  ..  . . 3. .: ,
1965.
2.  ..  . .: ,
1979.
3.  ..-. . . 9. .-.: , 1935.
4.  ..   
   . .: , 1966.
5.  ..   

1982.
  . .: ., 1895.
. 17-78.
- //       . .: - , 1988.
   ». .: , 1983.
   //    ­. 1982.  2.
  // . , , . .: , 1984.
. .-.: ., 1895.
6.  ..   -. .: ,
7.  ..     
8.  ..  . .: , 1973.
9.  .  . , 1903.
10.  ..  . . . 6. ., 1966.
11.  ..    
12.  ..  –  - «-
13.  ..   
14.  ..  () 
423
15.  .   .. -
 «   ». ., 1926.
16. Abdel-Kader .. The Life, Personality and Writings
of Al-Junayd. L., 1962.
17. Arberry A.J. An Introduction to the History f Sufism.
L., N.Y., 1942.
18. Bishai W.3. Humanists in the «'Arabic-Islamic World».
Harvard, 1973.
19. I slam. The Quranic Hermeneutics of the Sufi Sahl At-
Tustari (d.283/896). Berlin, L.N.Y., 1980.
20. Corbin . Creative imagination in the Sufism of Ibn
Arabi. L.
21. Fakhry I. History of Islamic Philosophy., L., 1970.
22. Kortei I., Die Hauptlehre des Averroes nach seiner
Schrift «Die Widerlegun des Gazali». Lonn, 1913.
23. Ivanov W. A guide to Ismaili Literature. L., 1933.
24. Landau R. The Philosophy of Ibn Arabi. K.Y, 1959.
25. Levy R.M.A. The Social Structure of Islam.
Cambridge, 1957.
26. Nasr S.N. Sufi assays. L., 1972.
27. Nicholson R.a. Studies in Islamic Mysticism. L., 1921.
28. Nicholson R.A. The Idea of Personality in Sufism.
Cambridge, 1923.
29. O'Leary De Locy, Arabic Thought it's place in History,
L., Rahman F. Prophecy in Islam. L., 1958.
30. Smith M. Al-Ghazali the Mystic. L., 1944.
31. Watt W.M. Islamic Philosophy and Theology,
Edinburgh, 1962.
32. Watt W.M. The Faith and Practice of al-Ghazzali. L.,
1953.
33. Watt W.M. Islamic Political Thought. Edinburgh,
1968.
424
34. Wolfson H.A. The Philosophy of the Kalam.
Cambridge. L., 1976.
35. Zaehner R.C. Hindu and Muslim. Mysticism. N.Y.,
1969.
36. Zwemer S.M. A Ivruslim Seeker after God. N.Y., 1920.
37. Affifi A.E. The Story of the prophet's ascent in Sufi
thought and literature // Islamic Quarterly. 1955. Vol. 11.
38. Bergh S. van den. Ghazali on Gratitude towards God
and it's Greek sources // Studia Islamica. 1957.  7.
39. Brent P. The Classical Master// The World of the Sufi.
Octagon, 1979.
40. Fakhry M. Some Paradoxical Implications of the
Mutalizilite View of Free Will // Moslem World. 1953. Vol. 43. 1.
41. Frank R.M. Al-Ashari's conception of the nature and role of speculative reasoning of theology // Proceeding of the 6th congresses of Arabic and Islamic' Studies. Stockholm, 1972.
42. Frank R.M. The Structure of Created Causality according to Al-Asari // Studia Islamica. 1966. Vol. 25.
43. Gairdner W.H.T. The Niche for Lifht // Pour Sufi Classics, Doctagon. L., 1960.
44. Goodman L.. Did al-Ghazali deny Causality? // Studia Islamica. 1978.  47.
45. Grunenbaum G.E. von. The Sources of Islamic Civilization// Der Islam. 1970. Bd. 46, N 1/2.- P.1-54.
46. Hourani G. Ethics in Medieval Islam,, A Conspectus// Essays on Islamic Philosophy and Science. N.Y., 1975.
47. Hourani G.P. Islamic and non-Islamic Origin of Mu'tazilite Ethical Rationalism // International Journal of Middle East Studies. 1976.  7.
48. Hourani G.P. Ibn Rushid's defence of Philosophy // The World of Islam. L., 1960.
425
49. Hourani G.P. The Basis of Authority of Concensus in Sunnite Islam // Studia Islamica. 1965. Vol. 21.
50. Lazaruth Y.I. P1 of the Religious Commandments in the Philosophy of al-Ghazali // Moslem World. 1961. Vol. 51. 3.
51. Lewis B. Some Observations on the significance of Heresy in the History of Islam // Studia Islamica. 1953.  1.
52. Macdonald D.B. The Life of al-Ghazali, with special reference to his religious, experience and opinion // JAOS. 1899. Vol. 20.
53. Macdonald D.B. Meanings of the Philosophers by al- Ghazzali // Isis. 1936.  25. . 9-15; 1937.  27.
54. Makdisi G. Asnari arid the Asharites in Islamic religious history // Studia Islamica. 1962. Vol. 17.
55. Nasr S.K. The meaning and role of «philosophy» in Islam // Studia Islamica. 1973.  37.
56. Nasr S.N. Al-Hikmat al-Ilahiyyah and Kalam // Studia Islamica. 1972. Vol. 34.
57. Padwick G.J. Al-Ghazali and the Arabic version of the Gospels // Moslem World. 1939.  29.
58. Robson J. Al-Ghazali and the Sunna // Moslem World.
1955. 45.
59. Schacht J. Mev” Sources for the History of Muhammadan Theology // Studia Islamica. 1953. Vol. 1.
60. Smith M. The Forerunner of al-Gnazali // JRAS.
1936.
61. Smith M. Al-Ghazali on the practice of the presence of God // Moslem World. 1933.  23.
62. Upper .. Al-Ghazali's thought concerning the nature of man and union with God // Moslem World. 1952.  42.
63. Watt W.M. Al-Ghazali // Encyclopaedia of Islam. Leiden, L., 1965. Vol. 11. Fascia 39.
426
64. Watt W.M. A forgery in al-Ghazali's Mishkat? // JRA3.
1949. P. 1-2.
65. Watt W.M. Tne Authenticity of the works attributed to al-Ghazali // JRAS. 1952. P.24-45.
66. Zwemer S.M. Jesus Christ in the Ihya of al-Ghazali // Moslem World. 1917.  7.
    –  1986.
67.  :  1317 .
68.  :   1331 .
69.  :   1972.
70.  :     1916  1964.
71.  :      ) .(
72.  :   –  1986.
73.  :     .  1993.
74.  :    .   1949.
75. :      ) .(.
76.  :       1987.
77.  :   1983.
78.  :      –  1986.
79.  :   1983.
80.  :     ).(
81.  :
82.  :    )    .(
83.  :  ! 1951.
84.  :  .  ) -.(
85.  :      1277 .
86.  :      ).(
87.  :   - 1986.
88.  :    1322 .
89.  :   –  1986.
90.  :      1972.
427
91.  :     1937.
92.  :       1346 .
93.  :      1326 
11  29.
94.  :     ) –.(
95.  :      ) –.(
96.  :     1901.
97.  :        1993.
98.   :   1960.
99.   :   1340 .
100.   :     1357-1359 .
101.   :      1962.
102.   :   1977.
103.   :   1930.
104.   :    ) –.(
105.   :    1982.
106.   :   1989.
107.   :   1329-1351 .
108.   :   1969.
109.   :   1971.
:     ) –.(
110.  
111.    :   350 .
112.   :     ) –.(
113.   :     1343 .
 1965.
114.   :    
115.    :      1957.
116.   :    1966.
117.   :    1299 .
118.    :   1887.
119.   :  1929.
428
120.    :     
1955.
121.   :      1951.
122.   :    1341- 1345.
123.   :      1986.
 1965.
124.   :
125.   :      1405.
126.    :   1932.
127.  :     )3) ( –
.(
128.   :     1308.
     1357.
129.  :
130.  :   1349.
131.  :  1947.
132. ) :(   1931.
133. )  :(    1985.
134.  :         
1958.
135.  :    1946.
136.  :   1947.
137.  :     ) –.(
138.  :    1326.
139.  :  1964.
:   1948.
140. 
141.  :  1950.
142.  :           
1968.
143.  :      1968.
144. )  :(  1966.
 :(       )
145. )
–.(
429
146. )  :(   1300 .
147. ) :(   1922.
148.   :   1378 .
149.  :   1979.
150.  :  1984.
151.  :    1938.
152.  :   1293.
153. )  :(   1939.
154. )   :(   1986.
155.  :         
1311.
156. )  :(   1968.
157.    :    1323.
158.  :    1906.
159.  :   1287.
160. )  :(  )    
.(
161.   :   1316 .
162.  :   1960.
163.  :   1960.
164.  :   1988.
165.  :    1962.
166.  :   1986.
167.  :   1931.
  1329.
168.    :
169.  :    1979.
170. ) :(    1914.
171.  ) :(    1965.
172. )  :(    )   
.(
:   1329.
173. 
430
Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]