Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1056_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
23 Мб
Скачать
4 Unconventional Insights in the Pathogenesis and Etiology of Fistulas in... 43
In the transitional zone immediately above the dentate line rectal columns,
papillae and sinuses are formed (Fenger 1979). Some openings of the anal ducts, connecting with the anal glands, are localized in the base of these sinuses, but others, the more rudimentary forms, are found in between or outside the internal sphincter. Most anal glands lay more proximal in the transitional zone. Up to 6–8 anal glands are mentioned, producing mucus and facilitating fecal transport along the anal canal. The lining epithelium of the anal ducts is as unpredictable as the lining of the transitional zone and varies between columnar, goblet cell, transitional, pseudo­stratied, and sometimes fallopian tube epithelium, reminding the pluripotential differentiation possibilities of the basal epithelial cells.
2.3 Histopathologic Concepts of Perianal Fistulas
The differences between anal tears, ssure , stula, abscess, and stula track lay mainly in clinical presentation and localization, not in histopathology (Sugrue et al.
2017). Anal abscesses and stulas are considered as different stages of the so-called
anal suppurative disease and believed to arise after obstruction of the anal duct, followed by stasis of contents. Infection with the gut-microbiome causes an exten­sive local inammatory process, rupture, abscess formation, and creating a connec­tion from the anal transitional zone to the intermuscular perineal spaces (Kiehne et al. 2007).
The main reason for the surgeon to ask for histopathology in patients with
perianal stulas is to exclude an underlying malignancy; a luetic ulcer; infections like HPV (human papillomavirus), HSV (herpes simplex virus), and LGV (lympho­granuloma venereum); or other causes of the inammatory process (Appelman
2014). Since the pathogenic mechanism of stula in IBD and especially in Crohns
disease patients is different and requires local as well as systemic treatment (Morson and Lockhart-Mummery 1959; Sica et al. 2014), these stulas have another pheno­type and are not included in this chapter.
The histopathological substrate of the anorectal suppurative disease is nearly
always a nonspecic acute but mostly chronic inammatory process with ulceration, forming of (hyper)granulation tissue and reactive epithelial hyperplasia in the neighborhood. Sometimes foreign body giant cells represent a local reaction on fecal material in the stula track; sometimes remnants of a squamous epithelial lining are reported. Noteworthy is the lack of anal ducts or glandular tissue in the numerous histopathological reports, circulating in the general pathology practice and as such never mentioned in the sparse studies about histopathology of perianal stulas.
More important in this respect is the complete absence of clinical information
about the origin of the removed tissue, the localization of the stula, the inner or outer opening, predisposing diseases, or previous surgical interventions like a seton, plug, or other, more invasive, procedures.
In spite of numerous different treatment strategies, the main unanswered question
remains why the inammatory process will not heal properly and which underlying
44 C. B. H. Molenaar et al.
pathogenetic mechanisms as well as (predisposing) diseases sustain this process. Several possibilities like persistent local infection with gut- and/or skin (anaerobic) bacteria or their remnants and systemic conditions like autoimmune diseases, dia­betes, obesity, and (congenital) alterations in the innate immune system are suggested (Vossen et al. 2018).
3 New Concepts in Our Out-of-the-BoxUnconventional
Approach and Hypothesis
3.1 Old Stories, New Histopathological Concepts?
In ancient, medieval, and modern times, the anorectal suppurative disease is a well­known disease. In literature concepts about the etiology are sparse. Parks in 1961 suggested an important role for the anal ducts and glands, subsequently followed by other authors (Parks 1961). But as mentioned above, in general practice and in literature, the histopathologic substrate of anal suppurative disease related to the anal ducts or glands is missing. This raises the question if after more than 60 years, this theory is still tenable.
In between 1995 and 2012, a few consistent publications about squamous
epithelium in the inner or the outer stula opening are found (van Koperen et al.
2010; Lunniss et al. 1995; Mitalas et al. 2012). The lack of proper clinical informa-
tion about the localization of the stula and the origin of the squamous epithelium hampers the interpretation of the results, and this is never considered as an important nding (van Koperen et al. 2010).
But recent literature about hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) did arise a new concept
of the ongoing inammatory process in perianal stula, comparable with HS (not in etiology but in pathogenesis) (Ardon et al. 2019; Vossen et al. 2018).
Given the localization of the inner opening in the linea dentate, covered by
primitive, vulnerable, difcult to the distinct transitional epithelium, the inner opening of the stula could be covered by this epithelium, keeping this opening patent and facilitating channel formation, a pathway for bacteria to the intermuscular spaces. The bacterial and epithelial debris cause a simultaneous cascade of inam­matory cytokines, with the histopathological substrate of a mixed inammatory inltrate, sometimes with multinucleated giant cells and followed by the formation of granulation tissue (van Onkelen et al. 2016; Ratto et al. 2016).
Surgical intervention with the placement of a seton or closure of the track could
just result in seeding epithelial remnants in the track, thus buryingthese compo­nents in the inammatory tissue. Sinus or track formation takes place caused by these epithelial remnants, forming cavities and abscesses, promoting continuous activation of the local immune system and an excellent habitat for bacteria of the gut-microbiome.
This results not in degeneration, but on the contrary the numerous inammatory
cytokines induce uncontrolled excessive epithelial proliferation, known as the
4 Unconventional Insights in the Pathogenesis and Etiology of Fistulas in... 45
feature of (pseudo) epithelial hyperplasia, ending up with keratinizing and as such just maintaining the inammatory reaction. Especially the role of inammatory cytokines is highlight ed in patients with HS, just indicating activation of the skin immune system (Ardon et al. 2019).
In literature numerous schematic drawings are found about the possible localiza-
tion of the perianal stula and abscesses, but in reality the correct position of the stula in between known anatomic structures is not documented. Its well known that tissue clefts surrounding penetrating neurovascular bundles and intermuscular dissection planes around the different muscles are the preferential sites for spreading inammatory processes in general and subsequently also perianal stulizing disease (Fig. 1).
Fistula formation in Crohn’s disease patients is associated with an epithelial
barrier defect which enables to penetrate pathog en-associated peptides to enter the gut mucous membrane (Siegmund et al. 2016). The local inammatory response and wound healing cytokines induce the so-called epithelial-mesenchymal transition, the transformation of intestinal epithelial cells to invasive primitive myobroblasts, as such resulting in stula formation and brosis (Bataille et al. 2008). This pathogenic mechanism, related to the epithelial lining, could also play a role in the persistence of the perianal stula in other patients without IBD.
In perianal stulas, formed on the above described pathogenetic mechanism, only
local radical surgical excision with removal of the whole process, like in HS and in pilonidal disease, will interrupt the vicious circle.
3.2 Old Stories, New Clinical Concepts?
As above already mentioned, patients with perianal stulas appear to have different clinical features. In the following chapter, the diversity of disease symptoms and courses are discussed, as encountered in clinical practice. Continuously we categorize the different clinical presentations into the different so-called clinical phenotypes.
3.2.1 Basic Concepts
In clinical practice the term stulais not only used for the connection between two spaces but also for the track from the internal opening leading to the abscess or pocket without the presence of an external opening. We prefer to exclusively use the term perianal stulaif there is an internal and an external opening. In other cases we would suggest to use the term track.
It is known that with an existing external opening, an internal opening is not
always identied. The general assumption is that the internal opening is too small to identify but does exist. In this case we would suggest using the term stula with unidentied internal opening.Of course this remains debatable, for example, in cases in which a hidradenitis suppurativa is suspected.
In this paragraph we refer to the aspect of stulas that havent been operated on
before and exclude the iatrogenic stulas.
46 C. B. H. Molenaar et al.
tissue clefts around penetrating neurovascular bundles and intermuscular dissection planes. Illustration by Anne Simon
Fig. 1 The anorectum with different histopathological types of cellular lining at different levels. Perianal stulas develop along the line of the least resistance:
4 Unconventional Insights in the Pathogenesis and Etiology of Fistulas in... 47
3.3 Based on Previous Medical History
Usually there is a previous history of a perianal abscess. An abscess can occur in different locations. On the one hand, this raises the question if there might be a different etiology. On the other hand, the technique used to drain the abscess might also have a direct relation with the development of a stula. Besides an abscess can have a supercial and a profound location at the same time, for example, one positioned in the levator muscle or intersphincteric space and one in the subcutaneous or submucosal space. If the supercial abscess is drained,but the profound extension is left untouched, this might lead to a deep chronic inammatory process with the risk of developing a stula tract. Diagnostics are rarely used prior to drainage of a perianal abscess, and the drainage is commonly performed outside ofce hours leaving it up to the general surgeon or resident on call. Surprisingly enough, no research has been done to understand the fact that in only 30% of these abscesses a stula develops (Hamadani et al. 2009; Oliver et al. 2003). So this denitely remains to be done.
A previous history of a chronic anal ssure is also mentioned (Deen-Molenaar
et al. 2016). We reported a patient with a chronic ssure who initially recovered with conservative treatment using diltiazem ointment and defecation regulation but got a relapse after a couple of weeks. He presented with an intersphincteric infection, which was identied on endo-anal ultrasound. Despite oral antibiotics he developed a postanal abscess. From our experience this is a quite common course.
Some patients present with a perianal stula without any previous history of an
abscess. They might presents some complaints of itching or burning during the previous weeks and then suddenly discover a pimple in the perianal region.
We reported a higher prevalence of perianal stula in patients with HS localized
in the axillae and the groins, but HS can also occur in the perianal region (Ardon et al. 2019). In our experience this is sometimes overseen by the clinician. Since HS can be treated in a lot of cases with proper medication, this underdiagnosis might lead to unnecessary invasive treatment.
There is also a trend towards previous histories with a proctologic treatment like
rubber band ligation, the drainage of a Bartholin cyst, or an episiotomy.
3.4 Aspect and Localization of the Fistula Opening
It is stated by Parks that the distance of the external opening from the anal verge does give a clue to the complexity of the stula. The larger the distance of the external orice to the anus, the higher the stula is situated. In clinical practice this is not always found. A low stula can have a long subcutaneous track. Furthermore, an external opening near the anal verge does not necessarily represent a low stula, since high intersphincteric stulas do frequently end near the anal verge.
The external opening can present with hypergranulation tissue or can be
completely epithelialized, like the aspect of an ear piercing. The internal opening is typically located at the level of the dentate line. However, in some cases the internal opening is located in the anoderm or above the dentate line.
48 C. B. H. Molenaar et al.
We identied the following groups of patients based on their clinical
presentation.
3.5 Phenotype 1
This type of perianal stula is typically seen after an episode of an anal ssure as described earlier in this chapter (Deen-Molenaar et al. 2016). Sometimes there are previous sequelae of recurrence of the anal ssure over the pas t months or even years. The patient can present with an anal abscess near to the anal verge. Sometimes spontaneous rupture of the abscess already occurred before presenta­tion, and they refer a periodically release of uid from the small rupture site. The resulting stula is usually a low transsphincteric or intersphincteric stula (Figs. 2,
3, 4, 5 and Table 1).
3.6 Phenotype 2
This type of perianal stula is the classical one that persists 3 months after the drainage of a perianal abscess. The patients usually present with a sudden onset of pain and swelling without any previous signs of anal complaints. Frequently the smell of the pus is strong due to an anaerobic infection. The abscess might be located at a deep (intersphincteric, supralevator of ischiorectal space) and a super­cial (subcutaneous) level. A horseshoe extension is common. The resulting stula is usually a high transsphincteric or intersphincteric stula (Figs. 6, 7, 8 and Table 2).
Fig. 2 (a) Transversal) and (b) sagittal. Endo-anal ultrasound in a patient with an acute anal ssure which appears as a hypoechogenic thickening of the internal anal sphincter at 7 oclock on the transversal transection
4 Unconventional Insights in the Pathogenesis and Etiology of Fistulas in... 49
Fig. 3 (a) Transversal and (b) sagittal. Endo-anal ultrasound with the suggestion of an intersphincteric infection which appears as a bigger hypoechogenic area on the transversal transec­tion compared to the ultrasound that was made 4 weeks before (Fig. 2a, b)
Fig. 4 (a) Transversal and (b) sagittal. Endo-anal ultrasound showing an abscess in the intersphincteric area
3.7 Phenotype 3
The patient who presents with this type of perianal stula does not reveal a previous history of a perianal abscess. They might present some complaints of itching or burning during the previous weeks and then suddenly discover a pimple in the perianal region. The resulting stula is usually a high transsphincteric or intersphincteric stula. The track of the stula is usually transsphincteric and sometimes with a long subcutaneous track (Figs. 9, 10, 11 and Table 3).
50 C. B. H. Molenaar et al.
Fig. 5 Transversal. Endo­anal ultrasound after drainage of the abscess and immediate stulotomy showing an incomplete defect in the internal anal sphincter
Table 1 Features of phenotype 1
Anal pain for more than 6 weeks previous to the presentation of the abscess Known with chronic anal ssure Recurrent periods with an intersphincteric infection (hypoechogenicity on the endo-anal
ultrasound) Abscess predominantly located postanal External opening of the stula at 0.5 to 1 cm from the anal verge in the midline Internal opening of the stula in the bottom of the ssure
Fig. 6 Showing a persisting wound 3 months after drainage of a perianal abscess. The wound shows hypergranulation tissue and at 8o’clock is a slight swelling palpable. With slight compression at this swelling bloody uid comes out of the wound at 3 oclock. This nding is typical for a persistent ischiorectal pocket after abscess drainage
4 Unconventional Insights in the Pathogenesis and Etiology of Fistulas in... 51
Fig. 7 Endo-anal ultrasound at different levels with a presenting a distal level, b an intermediate level, and c a proximal level. There is an area with hypo-echogenicity visible from 8 oclock (a)to 3o’clock (b). The internal opening of the stula is visible 6 o’clock at a high (or deep) level (c)
Fig. 8 Endo-anal ultrasound in rendering mode showing the hypoechogenic area in 3D seen in Fig. 7a–c
52 C. B. H. Molenaar et al.
Table 2 Features of phenotype 2
Fig. 9 External stula opening at 7 oclock and
1.5 cm from the anal verge with no hypergranulation tissue and therefore hardly recognizable
Sudden onset of anal pain Perianal abscess with anaerobic infection (strong smell) Horseshoe abscess common Hypergranulation tissue at the external opening Internal opening at the dentate line
3.8 Phenotype 4
We meant to include patients with a perianal hidradenitis suppurativa in the classi­cation of the phenotypes, because the stula can have an opening in the anal canal. Therefore, this type of stula should be identied in an early stage in order to offer the nonsurgical treatment available to treat HS. In our example we show a clear case of HS in a young woman. She was referred to us after HS treatment had failed, and here abscesses recurrently appeared (Figs. 12, 13, 14, 15 and Table 4).
3.9 Phenotype 5
The patient presents with a previous history of a recurrent abscess with pus or yellowish uid that doesnt have the typical smell of an anaerobic infection. The stula is usually a high transsphincteric stula and anteriorly located (Figs. 16, 17 and Table 5).