Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1056_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
23 Мб
Скачать
242 M. Adamina and G. Pozza
Fig. 4 Drainage of a submucosal or intersphincteric abscess.
Drainage is performed through the anorectal lumen by an intersphincteric incision below the dentate line
Fig. 5 Drainage of a supralevator abscess. A transrectal drainage (a) is performed when the levator plate is intact and the supralevator abscess originates from a pelvic source or from an upward abscess extension along the intersphincteric space. Conversely, a percutaneous drainage (b)is performed when the levator ani have been disrupted or the supralevator abscess results from an upward extension of a transsphincteric/ischiorectal abscess
15 How to Drain an Abscess 243
approach has been proposed which replaces the seton drainage by a ligation of the intersphincteric stula tract supplemented by adequate bilateral incisions and drainage (Tan et al. 2013).
Recurrent Abscesses
Recurrence rate is up to 44% after initial surgical drainage of an anorectal abscess. Risk factors for recurrence are the following:
Inadequate surgical drainage and insufcient postoperative care.
Missed secondary abscesses.
Horseshoe abscesses.
Failure to manage a primary stula: This latter point is, however, a contro-
versial issue. An untreated primary stula has about a 50% chance to heal spontaneously versus none to heal whenever a seton is placed. Also, complex stula procedures beyond simple stulotomy are contraindicated when local sepsis is present.
Crohns Disease
Crohn patients harboring perianal abscess are prone to a complicated course, including multiple abscesses, complex stula, and multiple recur­rences. Local sepsis control does not differ from cryptoglandular abscess and requires adequate surgical drainage with a radial incision. Yet, search for a
stula and insertion of a seton drainage are mandatory whenever an internalstula opening is identied (Adamina et al. 2020 ). Attention should be paid
not to injure the sphincter, neither surgically or by inconsiderate anal dilation in presence of scarring and/or insufcient anesthesiological sphincter relaxa­tion. Once surgical drainage has been performed, intensied medical treatment is paramount in order to control Crohn proctitis and allow for healing of the abscess-stula, respectively removal of the seton. Pelvic MRI should be liberally performed to assess and follow the course and complexity of perianal Crohns disease.
When multiple subcutaneous abscesses are present, acne inversa may be the primary cause of the perianal abscesses and mandate another approach than mere surgical drainage.
An alternative approach to classical surgical drainage is the percutaneous or transanal placement of a small drainage catheter into the abscess cavity to be kept in place until the drainage stops (Beck et al. 1988). This approach does not allow for exploration and digital disruption of any loculation, yet it has shown some success, in particular in the pediatric literature (Ladd et al. 2010; Alder et al. 2011).
6 Management of a Fistula Encountered When Draining
an Abscess
A stula is a tract that connects the perineal skin to the anorectal lumen. It is found in 30–70% of patients with anorectal abscesses at the time of diagnosis (Cox et al.
1997; Parks 1961; Vasilevsky and Gordon 1984). When a stula is not found during
244 M. Adamina and G. Pozza
Fig. 6 How to drain an abscess. The incision is
centered on the area of maximal uctuation upon clinical evaluation. A linear and radial incision is performed through the perianal skin, and pus is allowed to drain. The incision length equates the abscess size. Digital exploration followed by lavage ensures disruption of any loculation and thorough drainage. The linear incision stays open by virtue of tensile forces of the buttocks. Showering the wound three times a day and after every bowel movement ensures secondary wound healing within few weeks
15 How to Drain an Abscess 245
abscess drainage, it will develop in about 25–50% of patients months to years later (Zanotti et al. 2007; Hamalainen and Sainio 1998). A stula is suspected whenever an incised abscess fails to heal over few weeks and/or intermittent pain and secretion of pus is noted.
The internal stula opening is identied at rectoscopy mostly as a tiny inamed area. Application of pressure on the abscess cavity may help and deliver pus out of the internal stula opening, as can stula irrigation with a blue dye and/or hydrogen peroxyde from the outside opening, respectively skin incision. Hydrogen peroxyde also helps identication of the stula tract by endosonography.
The type of primary abscess inuences the likelihood of nding a stula. Subdermal abscesses are rarely associated with a stula,andwhenastula is found, it is usually a supercial simple submucosal or intersphincteric stul a amenable to stulotomy. Complex stulas involving signicant amount of the anal sphincter follow the abscess typology, e.g., a transsphincteric stula out of a transsphincteric abscess. In the context of an emergency abscess drainage, con­comitant stulotomy/stulectomy may be considered for simple anal stula, e.g., in a submucosal stula (Grade of recommendation: 2B) (Vogel et al. 2016). A stulotomy or a stulectomy performed during abscess drainage decreases the risk of persistence/recurrence of the abscess (relative risk: 0.13, 95% CI 0.07–0.24), yet it also markedly increases the risk of a clinically relevant sphincter injury (relative risk 3.06, 95% CI 0.7– 13.45) (Malik et al. 2010). Complex stula repair performed at the initial drainage procedure has little prospect of success owing to the inamed surgical eld. Hence, when a stula is identied during abscess drainage, the surgeon has 2 options:
– Leave the stula as it is and hope for spontaneous obliteration and healing of the
abscess- – Place a seton drainage and differ stula treatment for 2 months or more to allow
for sepsis resolution
stula

7 Wound Dressing

Once an abscess has been adequately drained, primary wound closure is prohibited and secondary wound healing is pursued. Light packing of the drained abscess cavity follows lavage and hemostasis. Of note, tight packing of an incision beyond the initial postoperative dressing is increasing pain and slowing down wound healing (OMalley et al. 2009; Perera et al. 2015; Tonkin et al. 2004).
Secondary wound healing requires regular wound cleaning, i.e., self­showering or assisted i rrigation three times a day and after ev ery bowel mov e­ment using tap water. Wound dressing has as the only purpose to protect the surroundings from the wound secre tions. Hence, sanitary pads offer an inexpen­sive option which perfectly matches the dressing needs of a patient with a d rained anorectal abscess.
246 M. Adamina and G. Pozza

8 Microbiology and Antibiotics

A routine intraoperative swab is not usually indicated (Grade of recommendation: 2C) (Vogel et al. 2016), unless fulminant sepsis is present or a fasciitis is suspected, which then requires histology and prompt, large debridemen t. Antibiotics are not given to otherwise healthy patients as they have no effect in reducing recurrence rate or improving healing.
An intraoperative swab and antibiotic treatment are reserved for patients presenting with:
1. Systemic sepsis
2. Locoregional cellulitis or large phlegmon
3. HIV infec tion
4. Prosthetic heart valve
5. Previous bacterial endocarditis
6. Congenital heart disease
7. Organ transplant recipient
Antibiotics are also recommended when a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is suspected/isolated.

9 General Postoperative Management

Once an abscess is surgically drained, pain relief follows immedi ately. In addition, a perianal block is advised, e.g., 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% injected into the intersphincteric plane at 3 h and 9 h in lithotomy position. Paracetamol and meta­mizole per os and liberal use of stool softener, e.g., macrogol 3350 and liquid parafn, have proven helpful in maintaining pain control. Secondary wound healing is usually a matter of few weeks, including repeat daily wound irrigation. Once to twice weekly ofce visits are advisable during early recovery to check upon the patient. Most of the time, a patient can return to work within 10–14 days following abscess drainage, and pending continued wound care/lavage is ensured. Last but not least, thoro ugh information and counseling of the patient are required to optimize compliance and outcome.

10 Conclusion

Anorectal abscesses are as frequent as appendicitis. Properly managing them requires typical surgical qualities: swift diagnosis based on good history taking and clinical examination; prompt treatment without time wasted with fancy addi­tional examinations, but for the few situations where clinical experience leads to a suspicion of complexity, e.g., Crohns disease; thorough drainage and debridement guided by knowledge of the anatomy and of the disease at hand, with a simple radial
15 How to Drain an Abscess 247
incision sufcient most of the time; and thorough information and counseling of the individual patient prior to and following surgery. It is hoped that the present chapter will contribute to developing the theoretical framework and practical knowledge required to perform sound diagnosis and treatment of anorectal abscesses.

11 Cross-References

Anorectal Anatomy Related to Anal Fistula and AbscessAnorectal Physio logy Related to Anal Fistula and AbscessClassication of Anal Fistula and AbscessClinical Assessment of Anal Cryptoglandular Abscess and FistulaClinical Assessment of Crohn Perianal Abscesses and FistulasEpidemiology of Anal Fistula and AbscessEndoanal Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Cryptoglandular Anal Fistulas and
Abscesses
Evidences for Optimal Surgical Management of Anal Fistulas and AbscessesFrom Abscess to FistulaMagnetic Resonance and Traditional Radiology in the Diagnosis of
Cryptoglandular Anal Fistula and Abscess
Ostomy and Proctectomy to Treat Anal Fistulas and Abscess; When and WhyUtility and Limitations of Endoanal Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Crohns Anal
Fistula and Abscess

References

Abcarian H (2011) Anorectal infection: abscess-stula. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 24(1):14–21 Abeysuriya V, Salgado LS, Samarasekera DN (2010) The distribution of the anal glands and the
variable regional occurrence of stula-in-ano: is there a relationship? Tech Coloproctol 14(4):
317–321 Adamina M, Bonovas S, Raine T, Spinelli A, Warusavitarne J, Armuzzi A, Bachmann O, Bager P,
Biancone L, Bokemeyer B, Bossuyt P, Burisch J, Collins P, Doherty G, El-Hussuna A, Ellul P,
Fiorino G, Frei-Lanter C, Furfaro F, Gingert C, Gionchetti P, Gisbert JP, Gomollon F, González
Lorenzo M, Gordon H, Hlavaty T, Juillerat P, Katsanos K, Kopylov U, Krustins E, Kucharzik T,
Lytras T, Maaser C, Magro F, Marshall JK, Myrelid P, Pellino G, Rosa I, Sabino J, Savarino E,
Stassen L, Torres J, Uzzan M, Vavricka S, Verstockt B, Zmora O (2020) ECCO guidelines on
therapeutics in Crohns Disease: surgical treatment. J Crohns Colitis 14(2):155–168 Adamo K, Sandblom G, Brannstrom F, Strigard K (2016) Prevalence and recurrence rate of perianal
abscess--a population-based study, Sweden 1997–2009. Int J Color Dis 31(3):669–673 Alder AC, Thornton J, McHard K, Buckins L, Barber R, Skinner MA (2011) A comparison of
traditional incision and drainage versus catheter drainage of soft tissue abscesses in children. J
Pediatr Surg 46(10):1942–1947 Amato A, Bottini C, De Nardi P, Giamundo P, Lauretta A, Realis Luc A, Tegon G, Nicholls RJ
(2015) Italian society of colorectal s. evaluation and management of perianal abscess and anal
stula: a consensus statement developed by the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR).
Tech Coloproctol 19(10):595–606
248 M. Adamina and G. Pozza
Baker B, Al-Salman M, Daoud F (2014) Management of acute perianal sepsis in neutropenic
patients with hematological malignancy. Tech Coloproctol 18(4):327–333 Beck DE, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, Jagelman DG, Weakley FL (1988) Catheter drainage of
ischiorectal abscesses. South Med J 81(4):444–446 Browder LK, Sweet S, Kaiser AM (2009) Modied Hanley procedure for management of complex
horseshoe stulae. Tech Coloproctol 13(4):301–306 Caliste X, Nazir S, Goode T, Street JH 3rd, Hockstein M, McArthur K, Trankiem CT, Sava JA
(2011) Sensitivity of computed tomography in detection of perirectal abscess. Am Surg 77(2):
166–168 Chen CY, Cheng A, Huang SY, Sheng WH, Liu JH, Ko BS, Yao M, Chou WC, Lin HC, Chen YC,
Tsay W, Tang JL, Chang SC, Tien HF (2013) Clinical and microbiological characteristics of
perianal infections in adult patients with acute leukemia. PLoS One 8(4):e60624 Cox SW, Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld MA, Mazier WP (1997) Outcome after incision and drainage
with stulotomy for ischiorectal abscess. Am Surg 63(8):686–689 Culp CE (1983) Chronic hidradenitis suppurativa of the anal canal. A surgical skin disease. Dis
Colon Rectum 26(10):669–676 Devaraj B, Khabassi S, Cosman BC (2011) Recent smoking is a risk factor for anal abscess and
stula. Dis Colon Rectum 54(6):681–685 Eisenhammer S (1956) The internal anal sphincter and the anorectal abscess. Surg Gynecol Obstet
103(4):501–506 Goligher JC, Ellis M, Pissidis AG (1967) A critique of anal glandular infection in the aetiology and
treatment of idiopathic anorectal abscesses and stulas. Br J Surg 54(12):977–983 Gosselink MP, van Onkelen RS, Schouten WR (2015) The cryptoglandular theory revisited. Color
Dis 17(12):1041–1043 Hamalainen KP, Sainio AP (1998) Incidence of stulas after drainage of acute anorectal abscesses.
Dis Colon Rectum 41(11):1357–1361. discussion 1361-1352 Held D, Khubchandani I, Sheets J, Stasik J, Rosen L, Riether R (1986) Management of anorectal
horseshoe abscess and stula. Dis Colon Rectum 29(12):793–797 Hyman N (1999) Anorectal abscess and stula. Prim Care 26(1):69–80 Ladd AP, Levy MS, Quilty J (2010) Minimally invasive technique in treatment of complex,
subcutaneous abscesses in children. J Pediatr Surg 45(7):1562–1566 Maconi G, Tonolini M, Monteleone M, Bezzio C, Furfaro F, Villa C, Campari A, DellEra A,
Sampietro G, Ardizzone S, de Franchis R (2013) Transperineal perineal ultrasound versus
magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of perianal Crohns disease. Inamm Bowel
Dis 19(13):2737–2743 Malik AI, Nelson RL, Tou S (2010) Incision and drainage of perianal abscess with or without
treatment of anal stula. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD006827 Marks CG, Ritchie JK, Lockhart-Mummery HE (1981) Anal stulas in Crohns disease. Br J Surg
68(8):525–527 Millan M, Garcia-Granero E, Esclapez P, Flor-Lorente B, Espi A, Lledo S (2006) Management of
intersphincteric abscesses. Color Dis 8(9):777– Nelson R (2002) Anorectal abscess stula: what do we know? Surg Clin North Am 82(6):
1139–1151 Nelson RL, Abcarian H, Davis FG, Persky V (1995) Prevalence of benign anorectal disease in a
randomly selected population. Dis Colon Rectum 38(4):341–344 OMalley GF, Dominici P, Giraldo P, Aguilera E, Verma M, Lares C, Burger P, Williams E (2009)
Routine packing of simple cutaneous abscesses is painful and probably unnecessary. Acad
Emerg Med 16(5):470–473 Parks AG (1961) Pathogenesis and treatment of stuila-in-ano. Br Med J 1(5224):463–469 Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD (1976) A classication of stula-in-ano. Br J Surg 63(1):1–12 Perera AP, Howell AM, Sodergren MH, Farne H, Darzi A, Purkayastha S, Paraskeva P (2015) A
pilot randomised controlled trial evaluating postoperative packing of the perianal abscess.
Langenbecks Arch Surg 400(2):267–271
780
15 How to Drain an Abscess 249
Pomerri F, Dodi G, Pintacuda G, Amadio L, Muzzio PC (2010) Anal endosonography and
stulography for stula-in-ano. Radiol Med 115(5):771–783 Prasad ML, Read DR, Abcarian H (1981) Supralevator abscess: diagnosis and treatment. Dis Colon
Rectum 24(6):456–461 Rosen L (1994) Anorectal abscess-stulae. Surg Clin North Am 74(6):1293–1308 Sahnan K, Adegbola SO, Tozer PJ, Watfah J, Phillips RK (2017) Perianal abscess. BMJ 356:j475 Sainio P (1984) Fistula-in-ano in a dened population. Incidence and epidemiological aspects. Ann
Chir Gynaecol 73(4):219–224 Seow-Choen F, Ho JM (1994) Histoanatomy of anal glands. Dis Colon Rectum 37(12):1215–1218 Siddiqui MR, Ashraan H, Tozer P, Daulatzai N, Burling D, Hart A, Athanasiou T, Phillips RK
(2012) A diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of endoanal ultrasound and MRI for perianal stula
assessment. Dis Colon Rectum 55(5):576–585 Tan KK, Koh DC, Tsang CB (2013) Managing deep postanal space sepsis via an Intersphincteric
approach: our early experience. Ann Coloproctol 29(2):55–59 Tonkin DM, Murphy E, Brooke-Smith M, Hollington P, Rieger N, Hockley S, Richardson N,
Wattchow DA (2004) Perianal abscess: a pilot study comparing packing with nonpacking of the
abscess cavity. Dis Colon Rectum 47(9):1510–1514 Toyonaga T, Matsushima M, Tanaka Y, Shimojima Y, Matsumura N, Kannyama H, Nozawa M,
Hatakeyama T, Suzuki K, Yanagita K, Tanaka M (2007) Microbiological analysis and endoanal
ultrasonography for diagnosis of anal stula in acute anorectal sepsis. Int J Color Dis 22(2):
209–213 Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA (1999) Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence
grading systems. Gut 44(1):77–80 Vasilevsky CA, Gordon PH (1984) The incidence of recurrent abscesses or stula-in-ano following
anorectal suppuration. Dis Colon Rectum 27(2):126–130 Vogel JD, Johnson EK, Morris AM, Paquette IM, Saclarides TJ, Feingold DL, Steele SR (2016)
Clinical practice guideline for the management of anorectal abscess, stula-in-Ano, and
rectovaginal stula. Dis Colon Rectum 59(12):1117–1133 Wei PL, Keller JJ, Kuo LJ, Lin HC (2013) Increased risk of diabetes following perianal abscess: a
population-based follow-up study. Int J Color Dis 28(2):235–240 Yano T, Asano M, Matsuda Y, Kawakami K, Nakai K, Nonaka M (2010) Prognostic factors for
recurrence following the initial drainage of an anorectal abscess. Int J Color Dis 25(12):
1495–1498 Zanotti C, Martinez-Puente C, Pascual I, Pascual M, Herreros D, Garcia-Olmo D (2007) An
assessment of the incidence of stula-in-ano in four countries of the European Union. Int J
Color Dis 22(12):1459–1462

The Seton in Anal Fistula Management

16
Jacopo Martellucci and Maria Laura Vuolo
Contents
1 Introduction .................... ............................... ............................. 252
2 2500 Years of Setons ....................................................................... 252
3 To Put or Not to Put ....................................................................... 253
4 To Cut or Not to Cut....................... ................................................ 254
5 What Kind of Seton to Use? ............ ................................................... 255
6 Draining Seton as the Only Treatment (A Pathophysiological Paradox?) ................ 256
7 Seton 2.0: New Perspectives ............................................................... 258
8 Uncomfortable Questions (How to Do It) ... . ........................... .................. 259
9 What Patients Should Know ................................... ............................ 260
10 Conclusions: Seton in Guidelines ......................................................... 261
References ............................ ............................................... ............ 263
Abstract
Fistula-in-ano is a challenging problem where treatment attempts have been traced back to the days of Hippocrates and even earlier. Surgical treatment of stula-in-ano is dictated by the amount of sphincter involved and internal and external anal sphincters preservation is in the interest of continence maintenance. There are a variety of reasons to use setons in the management of anal stulas. They consent to drain the track preparatory to an attempted repair (bridge to sphincter preserving techniques), as a way of staging stulotomy, or to set the stage for spontaneous healing. Although many advocate that loose seton place­ment should be the gold standard in the management of complex stula, existing literature results often consist of small/medium volume case series with limited follow-up and conicting results when compared to other techniques, still leaving to the surgeon the choice of the best treatment based on personal experience and patientscharacteristics.
J. Martellucci (*) · M. L. Vuolo Emergency Surgery/Pelvic Floor Center, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022 C. Ratto et al. (eds.), Anal Fistula and Abscess, Coloproctology,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76670-2_18
251
252 J. Martellucci and M. L. Vuolo
However, despite the heterogeneity of the studies on this topic, the variability of the results and their methodology usually retrospective and with short follow­up remains the impression that although the seton is an ancient treatment, its role in stula management is still predominant and can be further explored.
Keywords
Anal stula · Seton · Cutting seton · Loose seton · Surgical treatment · Drainage

1 Introduction

Over the years a wide range of treatments have been described in an attempt to treat stula-in-ano, aiming to achieve the closure of the stula but also preserving sphincteric function and minimizing healing times. However, while stulotomy is still regarded by many as the gold standard for lower and simple stula, questions remain about how to treat the more complex ones, and none of the available treatments is currently accepted as the gold standard. Moreover, excluding stulas in which stulotomy can be primarily safely performed, the insertion of a seton is considered by many a prerequisite for a successful treatment. There are a variety of reasons for which a seton can help in the management of anal stula: it can drain the tract before an attempted repair or a stulotomy, dry secondary tract and simplify the primary tract, lower the stula, or perform a time-controlled stulotomy with a regulated traction. Nowadays it is believed that the most correct treatment of anal stula is tailored to each individual case using various techniques according to the clinical features. Even accepting this perspective, the seton maintains a fundamental function for the management of these patients.

2 2500 Years of Setons

Fistula-in-ano is a challenging problem where treatment attempts have been traced back to the days of Hippocrates and even earlier.
In the ancient Indian medicine, Sushruta (estimated between 1200 and 600 BC),
one of the most signicant Indian medical writers, wrote a medical book (samhita) where in addition to amputation, lithotomy, and rhinoplasty, hernia surgery speaks about the perianal stulas and their treatment by burning with a hot iron (cauteriza­tion) and pulling the bers soaked with plant alkaloids that destroy callus tissue of stula and encourage fresh growth of granulation tissue (Ksharasutra therapy) (Maksimovic and Maksimovic 2013).
However, the documented history of stula management with seton started with
Hippocrates (460–377 BC). The word seton (from the Latin setu, meaning bristle) refers to any foreign material inserted through the stulous tract. In ancient Greek medicine, stula surgeries were carried out by Hippocratic school doctors by pulling of the linen threads or horsehair through the stula using a tin probe, with its gradual