Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1056_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
23 Мб
Скачать
158 R. J. F. Felt-Bersma
show a signicantly higher accuracy in the evaluation of internal openings, if com­pared with MR (P ¼ 0.47). In the complex anal stulas, MR showed a signicantly higher accuracy in the evaluation of secondary extensions if compared with 3D-EAUS (P ¼ 0.041) whereas in the simple anal stulas, no signicant difference was found. They concluded that in the preoperative workup of patients with anorectal stulas, 3D-EAUS may represent the rst-line diagnostic tool. In cases of stulas classied as complex by 3D-EAUS, MR may be indicated as adjunctive diagnostic imaging examination, to more carefully describe the stulascomplete anatomy.
5.3 Perineal Ultrasound
Transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) is a simple and noninvasive technique used to evaluate pelvic and perianal inammatory diseases. It can be a useful substitute for EAUS particularly when EAUS is not suitable for reasons of anal stricture, painful perianal abscesses, or inaccessible lesions extending far from the anus (e.g., into the scrotum or gluteus). The advantage of TPUS is that it is a low-cost, high-resolution, multiplanar modality that provides real-time performance. The limitations of TPUS are inadequate visualization of tissues that are far from the probe, due to the limited penetration of the ultrasonic beam (usually <5–6 cm), and the presence of skin tags or protruding anal lesions that hamper the quality of images. The learning curve in performing TPUS is not known, but it has been recognized that most experienced abdominal sonographers achieve competency in performing TPUS after approximately 12 exams (Stewart et al. 2001). That seems rather low and like with EAUS lying probably around 50 examinations with proper feedback from an experienced college.
TPUS is performed with conventional probes (3.5–7MHzmicroconvexprobe), positioned directly above the anus. Prior to the examination, the probe is prepared with application of contact gel and a latex glove or condom, which is then also covered with contact gel. Standard images are obtained from axial and longitudinal viewpoints over the perineal body, above the anus. In patients with perianal stulae, the probe can also be placed directly on the external orice of the stula to follow the stula course up to its internal opening. Additional oblique and angled images may also be obtained to better delineate pathology. The examination is typically well tolerated by patients, including children and infants. The main technical features of TPUS are outlined in Fig. 15.
Several studies have compared TPUS with surgical ndings or MRI and found a good correlation (Bezzio et al. 2017). Bor et al. (2016) performed a prospective study to compare the diagnostic accuracy of TPUS, EAUS (without H with surgical ndings in 23 patients with active perianal CD. They afrmed that the overall diagnostic accuracy in evaluating stulae, abscesses, and rectal involvement of the three imaging methods was nearly identical. Thus, TPUS seems an accurate, inexpensive, and noninvasive modality that may be used as the rst step in experi­enced hands for evaluation of peria nal stulizing disease. However, our impression is that the 3D-EAUS images are self-explanatory and provide better images for stulas and that TPUS should be reserved for pelvic oor issues such as demonstra­tion of dyssynergia, intussusception, and enterocele.
), and MRI
2O2
10 Endoanal Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Cryptoglandular Anal Fistulas and... 159
Fig. 15 Trans perineal ultrasound. (a) Position of the probe obtaining (b) a sagittal image (in rest) and (c) position of the probe for transversal image (d). Note that the posterior is on top. B ¼ bladder, U ¼ urethra, V ¼ vagina, R ¼ rectum, ARA ¼ anorectal angle. IAS ¼ internal anal sphincter
5.4 Comparison with 3D High-Resolution Anorectal Manometry
(3D-HRAM)
3D-HRAM measures anal pressures and provide a 3D pressure image of the anal sphincters. Felt et al. (2018) performed a study in 40 patients with cryptoglandular anal stulas comparing the anatomical features present with 3D-EAUS with the pressure prole with 3D-HRAM. A group of 30 patients without stulas served as control. Four patients had a primary stula, 19 were previously treated with a seton/abscess drain­age, and 17 had a recurrence after previously performed stula surgery. On 3D-HRAM, 24 (60%) stula tract areas were good and 8 (20%) moderately visible. All but seven (18%) patients had normal mean resting pressures. The mean resting pressure of the stula tract area was signicantly lower compared to the surrounding area (47 vs. 76 mmHg; p < 0.0001). Using a Δ mean resting pressure 30 mmHg difference between stula tract area and non-stula tract area as alternative cut-off,
160 R. J. F. Felt-Bersma
Fig. 16 Comparison EAUS and 3D HRAM. (a) normal tracing of 3D HRAM with 3D image and the 2D frontal image cut along the anterior (Ant). Post ¼ posterior. Note that left (L) and right (R) are switched compared to 3D EAUS. Preoperative imaging of a stula with (b) 3D HDRAM image and (c) 3D EAUS and postoperative 3D HRAM (d) and 3D-EAUS (e). Note that with 3D EUAS enhanced stula tract (f) with H stulotomy led to diminished pressure at the concomitant area with 3DHRAM (arrow)
(c) has changed into (e) hypoechogenic defect (d). The
2O2
21 (53%) patients were identied. In six patients 3D-HRAM was repeated after surgery: a local pressure drop was detected in one patient after stulotomy with increased complaints of fecal incontinence (Fig. 16). They concluded that profound
10 Endoanal Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Cryptoglandular Anal Fistulas and... 161
local anal pressure drops are found in the stula tract areas in patientsnormal mean resting pressures. Fistulotomy may affect local sphincter pressure. This might inu­ence surgical decision making in future. Prospective studies are warranted in patients with stula surgery to establish the clinical consequence in terms of both complaints and anal pressures.

6 Conclusion and Recommendation

Endoanal ultrasound is a diagnostic modal ity which can accurately delineate anat­omy of perianal stulae and abscesses in both cryptoglandular and Crohns disease. Results are comparable to MRI, examination under anesthesia and surgery, espe­cially when using hydrogen peroxide as contrast enhancement. In cryptoglandular disease EAUS should be performed in recurrent stula as complexity can be expected and preoperatively mapping the exact stula pattern can help prevent recurrence. In perianal stulizing Crohns disease EAUS can provide reliable end points in the clinical assessment and has the potential to improve outcome of patients. When more proximal stulas or abscesses are suspected, an additional MRI should be performed.
EAUS is a very handy tool and can easily be performed in an out-patient setting. Practices who use EAUS can use it at their disposal and the investigation can easily be repeated after surgery when necessary or in Crohns disease to evaluate the stulas or abscesses after treatment, without a waiting list for MRI. Compared to MRI, it is less expensive. Gastroenterologist, surgeons, and radiologists can perform EUS. Afnity and dedication toward the EUS is mandatory for a good quality.

References

Abcarian H (2011) Anorectal infection: abscess-stula. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 24:14–21 Alabiso ME, Iasiello F, Pellino G, Iacomino A, Roberto L, Pinto A, Riegler G, Selvaggi F, Reginelli
A (2016) 3D-EAUS and MRI in the activity of anal stulas in Crohns disease. Gastroenterol
Res Pract 2016:1895694. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1895694. Epub 2015 Dec 27. PMID:
26819596; PMCID: PMC4706885 Almeida IS, Jayarajah U, Wickramasinghe DP et al (2019) Value of three-dimensional endoanal
ultrasound scan (3D-EAUS) in preoperative assessment of stula-in-ano. BMC Res Notes 12:66 Becker A, Koltun L, Sayfan J (2006) Simple clinical examination predicts complexity of perianal
stula. Color Dis 8:601–604 Benjelloun EB, Souiki T, El Abkari M (2014) Endoanal ultrasound in anal stulas. Is there any
inuence on postoperative outcome? Tech Coloproctol 18:405–406 Bezzio C, Bryant RV, Manes G et al (2017) New horizons in the imaging of perianal Crohns
disease: transperineal ultrasonography. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:523–530 Blom J, Nyström PO, Gunnarsson U et al (2011) Endoanal ultrasonography may distinguish
Crohns anal stulae from cryptoglandular stulae in patients with Crohns disease: a cross-
sectional study. Tech Coloproctol 15:327–330 Bor R, Farkas K, Bálint A et al (2016) Prospective comparison of magnetic resonance imaging,
transrectal and transperineal sonography, and surgical ndings in complicated perianal Crohn
disease. J Ultrasound Med 35:2367–2372
162 R. J. F. Felt-Bersma
Brillantino A, Iacobellis F, Reginelli A et al (2019) Preoperative assessment of simple and complex
anorectal stulas: tridimensional endoanal ultrasound? Magnetic resonance? Both? Radiol Med
124:339–349 Burnett SJ, Bartram CI (1991) Endosonographic variations in the normal internal anal sphincter. Int
J Color Dis 6:2–4 Cheong DM, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD et al (1993) Anal endosonography for recurrent anal stulas:
image enhancement with hydrogen peroxide. Dis Colon Rectum 36:1158–1160 Choen S, Burnett S, Bartram CI et al (1991) Comparison between anal endosonography and digital
examination in the evaluation of anal stulae. Br J Surg 78:445–447 Deen KI, Williams JG, Hutchinson R, Keighley MR, Kumar D (1994) Fistulas in ano: endoanal
ultrasonographic assessment assists decision making for surgery. Gut 35(3):391–394. https://
doi.org/10.1136/gut.35.3.391. PMID: 8150354; PMCID: PMC1374597
Ding J-H, Bi L-X, Zhao K et al (2015) Impact of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound on the
outcome of anal stula surgery: a prospective cohort study. Color Dis 17:1104–1112 Eglinton TW, Barclay ML, Gearry RB et al (2012) The spectrum of perianal Crohns disease in a
population-based cohort. Dis Colon Rectum 55:773–777 Emile SH, Magdy A, Youssef M et al (2017) Utility of endoanal ultrasonography in assessment of
primary and recurrent anal stulas and for detection of associated anal sphincter defects. J
Gastrointest Surg 21:1879–1887 Felt-Bersma RJF, Vlietstra MS, Vollebregt PF et al (2018) 3D high-resolution anorectal manometry
in patients with perianal stulas: comparison with 3D-anal ultrasound. BMC Gastroenterol 1:44 Gustafsson UM, Kahvecioglu B, Astrom G et al (2001) Endoanal ultrasound or magnetic resonance
imaging for preoperative assessment of anal stula: a comparative study. Color Dis 3:189–197 Kołodziejczak M, Santoro GA, Obcowska A et al (2017) Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound is
accurate and reproducible in determining type and height of anal stulas. Color Dis 19:378–384 Law PJ, Bartram CI (1989) Anal endosonography: technique and normal anatomy gastrointest.
Radiol 14:349–353 Law PJ, Talbot RW, Bartram CI et al (1989) Anal endosonography in the evaluation of perianal
sepsis and stula in ano. Br J Surg 76:752–755 Luglio G, Giglio MC, Rispo A et al (2018) Diagnostic accuracy of 3-dimensional endoanal
ultrasound in identifying perianal Crohns stulas. Dis Colon Rectum 61:831–837 Murad-regadas SM, Regadas Filho FSP, Holanda EC et al (2018) Three-dimensional anorectal
ultrasonography be included as a diagnostic tool for the assessment of anal stula before and
after surgical treatment? Arq Gastroenterol 55 suppl:118–124 Murad-Regadas SM, Regadas FSP, Rodrigues LV et al (2010) The role of 3-dimensional anorectal
ultrasonography in the assessment of anterior transsphincteric stula. Dis Colon Rectum 53:
1035–1040 Navarro-Luna A, Garcia-Domingo MI, Rius-Macias J et al (2004) Ultrasound study of anal
with hydrogen peroxide enhancement. Dis Colon Rectum 47:108–114 Nielsen MB, Hauge C, Rasmussen OO, Sorensen M et al (1992) Anal sphincter size measured by
endosonography in healthy volunteers. Effect of age, sex, and parity. Acta Radiol 33:453–456 Papachrysostomou M, Pye SD, Wild SR et al (1994) Signicance of the thickness of the anal
sphincters with age and its relevance in faecal incontinence. Scand J Gastroenterol 29:710–714 Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD (1976) A classication of stula-in-ano. Br J Surg 63:1–12 Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA et al (1999) Anal endosonography in haemorrhoidal
disease: do anatomical changes have clinical implications? Color Dis 1:146–150 Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJF, Eijsbouts QA et al (1998a) Hydrogen peroxide-enhanced transanal
ultrasound in the assessment of stula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 41:1147–1152 Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA et al (1998b) Vaginal endosonography of the anal sphincter
complex is important in the assessment of faecal incontinence and perianal sepsis. Br J Surg
853:359–363 Ratto C, Gentile E, Merico M et al (2000) How can the assessment of stula-inano be improved?
Dis Colon Rectum 43:1375–1382
stulas
10 Endoanal Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Cryptoglandular Anal Fistulas and... 163
Ratto C, Grillo E, Parello A et al (2005) Endoanal ultrasound-guided surgery for anal stula.
Endoscopy 37:722–728 Roig JV, García-Armengol J, Jordán JC, Moro D, García-Granero E, Alós R (2010) Fistulectomy
and sphincteric reconstruction for complex cryptoglandular stulas. Colorectal Dis 12(7
Online):e145–e152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02002.x. Epub 2009 Jul 9.
PMID: 19604292 Rosa G, Lolli P, Piccinelli D et al (2006) Fistula in ano: anatomoclinical aspects, surgical therapy
and results in 844 patients. Tech Coloproctol 10:215–221 Siddiqui MR, Ashraan H, Tozer P et al (2012) A diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of endoanal
ultrasound and MRI for perianal stula assessment. Dis Colon Rectum 55:576–585 Sloots CE, Felt-Bersma RJ, Poen AC et al (2001a) Assessment and classication of never operated
and recurrent cryptoglandular stulas-in-ano using hydrogen peroxide enhanced transanal
ultrasound. Color Dis 3:422–426 Sloots CE, Felt-Bersma RJ, Poen AC, Cuesta MA et al (2001b) Assessment and classication of
stula-in-ano in patients with Crohns disease by hydrogen peroxide enhanced transanal ultra-
sound. Int J Color Dis 16:292–297 Spencer JA, Chapple K, Wilson D et al (1998) Outcome after surgery for perianal stula: predictive
value of MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:403–406 Stewart LK, McGee J, Wilson SR (2001) Transperineal and transvaginal sonography of perianal
inammatory disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:627–632 Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN et al (1994) Endosonography of the anal sphincters: normal
anatomy and comparison with manometry. Clin Radiol 49:368–374 Sultan AH, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA et al (1993) Anal endosonography and correlation with in vitro
and in vivo anatomy. Br J Surg 80:508–511 Tantiphlachiva K, Sahakitrungruang C, Pattanaarun J et al (2019) Effects of preoperative endoanal
ultrasound on functional outcome after anal stula surgery. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 6:e000279 Van Assche G, Dignass A, Panes J et al (2010) The second European evidence-based consensus on
the diagnosis and management of Crohns disease: special situations. J Crohns Colitis 4:3–101 van Bodegraven AA, Sloots CEJ, Felt-Bersma RJF et al (2002) Endosonographic evidence of
persistence of Crohns disease-associated stulas after iniximab treatment, irrespective of
clinical response. Dis Colon Rectum 45:39–45 Vander Mijnsbrugge GJH, Felt-Bersma RJF, Ho DKF et al (2019) Perianal stulas and the lift
procedure: results, predictive factors for success, and long-term results with subsequent treat-
ment. Tech Coloproctol 23:639–647 Weisman N, Abbas MA (2008) Prognostic value of endoanal ultrasound for stula-in-ano: a
retrospective analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1089–1092 West RL, van der Woude CJ, Hansen BE et al (2004) Clinical and endosonographic effect of
ciprooxacin on the treatment of perianal stulae in Crohn’s disease with iniximab: a double-
blind placebo-controlled study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 20:1329–1336 Zawadzki A, Starck M, Bohe M et al (2012) Unique 3D endoanal ultrasound feature of perianal
Crohns stula: the Crohn ultrasound stula sign. Color Dis 14:e608–e611 Zbar AP, Horesh N, Bucholtz V, Zmora O, Beer-Gabel M, Carter D (2013) Are there specic
endosonographic features in Crohns patients with perianal stulae? J Crohns Colitis 7(6):490–
496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crohns.2012.07.024. Epub 2012 Aug 21. PMID: 22921529
Magnetic Resonance and Traditional Radiology in the Diagnosis
11
of Cryptoglandular Anal Fistula and Abscess
Laura Maria Minordi, Luigi Larosa, Antonio Bevere, Giovanni Cimino, and Riccardo Manfredi
Contents
1 Introduction . ............... .................................................................. 166
2 Imaging ...... . ................. ........................................................ ...... 168
2.1 Conventional Contrast Material-Enhanced Fistulography ............................ 168
2.2 CT...................................................................................... 168
2.3 Magnetic Resonance Imaging . ........................................................ 171
3 Conclusion ................................................................................... 190
4 Cross-References .......................... ............................................. ..... 190
References ............................ ............................................... ............ 190
Abstract
Perianal stula is an inammatory condition, which refers to an anomalous connection between the anal canal and the skin of the perineum. It usually affects young adults, and it is more common in men than in women. Most anal stulae are cryptogenic in origin (90.4%); in the other cases, they occur together with predisposing conditions such as pelvic tumors (4.8%), previous pelvic surgery or trauma (3.3%), Crohns disease (1.3%), and tuberculosis (0.2%). Infection caused by the obstruction of the anal crypts is the most plausible pathogenic mechanism
L. M. Minordi (*) · L. Larosa Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radiologia Diagnostica e Interventistica Generale, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Rome, Italy e-mail: lauramaria.minordi@policlinicogemelli.it
A. Bevere · G. Cimino Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Radiologia, Rome, Italy
R. Manfredi Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radiologia Diagnostica e Interventistica Generale, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Rome, Italy
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Radiologia, Rome, Italy
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022 C. Ratto et al. (eds.), Anal Fistula and Abscess, Coloproctology,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76670-2_13
165
166 L. M. Minordi et al.
in cryptogenic perianal stulas. Offering the lowest resistance pathway, the infection begins in the inter-sphincteric space, where it may spread relatively rapidly into adjacent anatomical compartments. The rst radiological exam used to study perianal stulas was contrast material-enhanced stulography. This technique was limited by the inability to evaluate the anal sphincter complex, secondary extensions of the stula, as well as relevant anatomic compartments and muscles. MR imaging is the most accurate method for determining the presence and assessing the course of anal stulas due to its high soft tissue contrast and multiplanar ability, allowing high accuracy of up to 93%, and it may also help to reduce recurrence after surgery.
Keywords
Perianal stula · Anal canal · Cryptogenic stulas · Abscess · MR imaging

1 Introduction

Perianal stula is an inammatory condition, which refers to an anomalous connec­tion between the anal canal and the skin of the perineum. It usually affects young adults, and it is more common in men than in women (Balcı et al. 2019).
Nonspecic cryptogenic stulas are by far the most common type of stula, representing 90.4% of the total cases and having a prevalence estimated to be approximately 10 per 100,000 of the general population (Dwarkasing et al. 2005; Balcı et al. 2019). In the other cases, they are associated with predisposing condi­tions such as pelvic tumors (4.8%), previous pelvic surgery or trauma (3.3%), Crohns disease (1.3%), and tuberculosis (0.2%) (Baskan et al. 2014).
A correct comprehension of anorectal anatomy is crucial for understanding the pathological mechanism of the cryptogenic anal stulas. The anal canal is approx­imately 3–4.5 cm long. The upper two thirds and the lower one third of the anal canal are separated by the dentate line, which marks the transition from columnar epithe­lium to the stratied squamous epithelium. The anal sphincter is made up of a double ring, the muscle internal sphincter, and the muscle external sphincter, as well as the puborectalis sling arising from the levator ani musculature. The internal sphincter is involuntary and is formed by smooth muscle continuous with the circular smooth muscle of the rectum. It is responsible for 85% of anal tone at rest. A division of the internal sphincter usually does not cause a loss of continence. The external sphincter is formed by striated muscle, and it contributes only 15% of resting anal tone, but its strong voluntary contractions oppose defecation. Its division can lead to inconti­nence. The area located between the internal and external sphincters is called inter­sphincteric space, which extends from the para-rectal intramural space to the perianal subcutaneous space. The ischiorectal space, located in the buttock, is conned medially by the external sphincter, superiorly by the levator ani muscle, and inferi­orly by the skin. The supra-levator space lies above the levator muscles, next to the rectum (Morris et al. 2000).
11 Magnetic Resonance and Traditional Radiology in the Diagnosis of... 167
Chiari (1878) described the anal glands, branched glandular structures with a stratied columnar epithelium lining, approximately six to ten in number, usually more numerous in men than in women. These glands are equally allocated around the circumference of the anal canal, with their ducts opening into the base of the crypts of Morgagni, and are situated above the anal valves at the level of the dentate line (de Miguel Criado et al. 2012). The majority of the glands are subepithelial, with some located in the longitudinal layer of the internal sphincter, although others may terminate in the inter-sphincteric space, next to the external sphincter (de Miguel Criado et al. 2012). Infection caused by the obstruction of the anal crypts is the most plausible pathogenic mechanism in cryptogenic perianal stulas (Abou-Zeid 2011; Sneider and Maykel 2013; Balcı et al. 2019). The infection begins in the inter­sphincteric space, where it may spread relatively rapidly into adjacent anatomical compartments (Abou-Zeid 2011; Sneider and Maykel 2013; Balcı et al. 2019). In particular, an abscess growing in a supercial gland could spontaneousl y discharge into the anal canal (de Miguel Criado et al. 2012). However, the rupture of an abscess located deep to the internal sphincter, which can serve as a barrier, results in pus traveling along the inter-sphincteric space, which represents the path with the least resistance; from this site it reaches the skin, forming an inter-sphincteric stula (Parks 1961). Alternatively, a trans-sphincteric stula forms when the infection passes through both layers of the external sphincter, and a supra-sphincteric stula forms when the infection spreads around the entire external sphincter and part of the levator ani to reach the ischiorectal fossa (Parks 1961). The infection can reach the perianal skin where it can drain itself (Abou-Zeid 2011; Balcı et al. 2019).
The most common stulas are the inter-sphincteric (40–70%) and the trans-sphinc­teric (20–40%) stulas. In a minority of cases (5–15%), the infection spreads upward in the ischiorectal fossa, over the sphincter (supra-sphincteric stulization) (de Parades et al.
2010). Sepsis originating within the pelvis may extend to the skin through the ischiorectal
fossa, resulting in an extra-sphincteric or trans-levator stula (Morris et al. 2000).
Abscess cavities may develop along the course of stulous tracks; therefore, inter-sphincteric stulas can lead to the development of a perianal abscess or an abscess encysted within the inter-sphincteric space. Trans-sphincteric stulas are typically correlated with ischiorectal fossa abscesses. Supra-levator abscesses are the least common, about 8% of the total. They are classied on basis of anatomical locations (retrorectal, recto-vesical, rectovaginal, pelvi-rectal) and can spread into the abdominal preperitoneal or retroperitoneal spaces (Morris et al. 2000).
The most frequent presenting symptom is skin secretions from the cutaneous opening of the tract (Balcı et al. 2019).
A stula having a separate track and a separate internal openin g and which exists simultaneously with the original stula is called a synchronous stula. Synchronous stulas are general ly rare, and they differentiate from a branching stula where all branches eventually converge into a single internal opening. Synchronous stulas dont necessarily have an external opening, and they may or may not have an external opening (Abou-Zeid 2011).
Treatment goals are to eliminate the stula tracts and to prevent recurrence while avoiding fecal incontinence. However, complete and lasting eradication of the
168 L. M. Minordi et al.
disease is hardly achieved. Simple stulas, involving <30% of the sphincter com­plex, are relatively easier to manage and have a lower risk of fecal incontinence. The approach to complex stulas is more difcult as they involve >30% of the sphincter complex, resulting in a higher risk of recurrence and fecal incontinence (Machielsen et al. 2020). For these reasons optimal management of perianal stulas requires a detailed preoperative planning, including a precise assessment of the stulas char­acteristics (such as detection and direction of the internal opening and the evalua­tions of the extent of ramications) (Baik et al. 2017). It is fundamental to have accurate radiological information to plan the most appropriate surgical approach and decrease the risk of recurrence (Baik et al. 2017). Variations of the anatomy of the stula or the integrity of the anal canal can result in difculties during anal stulas surgery (Abou-Zeid 2011). Therefore, the best way to reduce the recurrence rate is to localize the correct internal opening preoperatively (Abou-Zeid 2011).

2 Imaging

2.1 Conventional Contrast Material-Enhanced Fistulography
The rst radiological exam used to study perianal stulas was contrast material­enhanced stulography, which requires the injection of water-soluble contrast from the external opening of the stula.
A retrospective study investigated the reliability of stulography, assessing images from 25 patients. The correct diagnosis was achieved in only 16% of the patients, demonstrating the inaccuracy of this imaging modality (Kuijpers and Schulpen 1985).
When compared with operative ndings, stulography was unreliable, with only 16% concordance and 12% of false-positive ndings of high extensions and rectal openings (Halligan and Stoker 2006; Jordán et al. 2010).
This technique suffers some major drawbacks. First, the contrast may fail to reach and ll the farthest extensions of the stula, as well as the areas which may be plugged with debris, or if there is an excessive contrast reux from the internal or external openings. Second, there is not a direc t visualization of the sphincter muscles and the pelvic oor, which means that it is difcult to establish the relationship between the adjacent structures and the stula. For example, it is frequently very hard to decide whether a visualized extension is supra-levator or in the roof of the ischioanal fossa (i.e., infra-levator). Ultimately, stulography can be arduous to interpret.
2.2 CT
Computed tomog raphy (CT) is an efcient, readily available diagnostic method, useful especially to study older patients and those who present with acute manifes­tations in the emergency department (Khati et al. 2015; Guniganti et al. 2017). These