Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_1056_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •About the Editors
- •Contributors
- •3 Host Factors: Age, Gender, Lifestyle
- •4 IBD and Other Etiologically Relevant Comorbid Conditions
- •5 Anatomical Presentation and Rectovaginal Fistula
- •6 Anal Fistula Development: Microbiological Factors
- •7 Recurrence and Cancer Risk
- •8 Conclusion
- •References
- •1 Epidemiology of Anal Fistula and Abscess
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Incidence and Prevalence
- •2.1 Europe
- •2.2 USA and Canada
- •2 Anorectal Anatomy Related to Anal Fistula and Abscess
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Mucosal Layer and Submucosal Space
- •3 Internal Anal Sphincter
- •4 Intersphincteric Space and Conjoint Longitudinal Muscle
- •5 External Anal Sphincter
- •6 Pelvic Floor
- •7 Extra-anal Spaces/Ischioanal Fossae
- •8 Anal Glands
- •10 Conclusion
- •11 Cross-References
- •References
- •3 Anorectal Physiology Related to Anal Fistula and Abscess
- •1 Principal Aspects of Anorectal Physiology
- •1.1 Secretory Function of the Anorectum and the Cryptoglandular Hypothesis
- •1.2 Histology and Cellular Physiology of the Anorectum and Fistula
- •1.3 Microbiology and Fistula
- •1.4 Host Factors Relevant to Abscess and Fistula
- •1.5 Anal Continence
- •1.5.1 The Rectum
- •1.5.2 The Musculature of the Pelvic Floor and Sphincter Complex
- •1.6 Defecation
- •1.7 Anorectal Physiology Testing in the Context of Fistula
- •1.7.2 Perioperative Anorectal Physiology Testing
- •2 Conclusion
- •References
- •4 Unconventional Insights in the Pathogenesis and Etiology of Fistulas in the Perianal Region
- •1 Introduction
- •1.1 Etiology
- •1.2 Risk Factors for Development of Perianal Fistula
- •1.3 Risk Factors due to the Type of Perianal Fistula
- •1.4 Treatment-Related Risk Factors for Failure
- •1.5 Preliminary Conclusions
- •2.1 Anatomy of the Anal Canal
- •2.2 Histology of the Anal Canal
- •2.3 Histopathologic Concepts of Perianal Fistulas
- •3.1 Old Stories, New Histopathological Concepts?
- •3.2 Old Stories, New Clinical Concepts?
- •3.2.1 Basic Concepts
- •3.3 Based on Previous Medical History
- •3.4 Aspect and Localization of the Fistula Opening
- •3.5 Phenotype 1
- •3.6 Phenotype 2
- •3.7 Phenotype 3
- •3.8 Phenotype 4
- •3.9 Phenotype 5
- •4 Discussion and Conclusions
- •5 Cross-References
- •References
- •5 From Abscess to Fistula
- •1 Anorectal Abscess
- •References
- •6 Classification of Anal Fistula and Abscess
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Purpose and Attributes of a Classification
- •3 Overview of Anal Fistula Classifications
- •4 Anal Fistula Classifications
- •4.1 Parks Classification
- •4.1.1 Strong Points
- •4.1.2 Weak Points
- •5.1 Strong Points
- •5.2 Weak Points
- •6 Garg Classification
- •6.6 Strong Points
- •6.7 Weak Points
- •7 Status of Extrasphincteric Fistulas
- •8 Evaluation of Existing Classifications on Long-Term Data
- •9 Conclusions
- •References
- •7 Clinical Assessment of Anal Cryptoglandular Abscess and Fistula
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Types of Clinical Evaluation
- •3 Diagnosis
- •4 Topographic Evaluation
- •4.1 The Cryptic Endoanal Primary Opening
- •4.2 The Secondary Opening or Openings
- •4.3 The Main Tract of the Fistula
- •4.4 Possible Purulent Collections
- •1.1 Physical Examination of the Anus and Rectum: General Principles
- •4.5 Possible Secondary Extensions
- •5 Conclusion
- •References
- •8 Clinical Assessment of Crohn Perianal Abscesses and Fistulas
- •1 Introduction
- •1.2 Inspection
- •1.3 Palpation
- •1.4 Endoscopy
- •2 Clinical Presentation
- •2.1 Skin Lesions
- •2.2 Fistulas
- •2.3 Abscesses
- •2.4 Diagnostic Workup
- •2.4.1 General Principles
- •2.5 US
- •2.6 Effectiveness and Sensitivity
- •2.6.1 Endoscopy
- •2.7 MRI
- •2.7.1 CT Scan
- •2.7.2 Fistulography
- •2.8 Diagnostic Follow-up
- •References
- •9 Anorectal Physiology Assessment in Patients with Anal Fistula: When Necessary
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Anorectal Physiology Assessment
- •2.1 Anamnesis
- •2.2 Physical Examination
- •2.3 Anorectal Manometry
- •2.3.1 Equipment
- •2.3.2 Manometry Systems
- •2.4 Neurophysiologic Tests
- •2.4.1 Electromyography
- •2.4.2 Nerve Conduction Studies
- •2.5 Endoanal Ultrasound
- •2.6 Role of Anorectal Physiology Patterns in the Decision-Making
- •3 Discussion
- •References
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Anal Anatomy
- •3 Classification of Fistulas
- •4 EAUS Imaging
- •4.1 Probes EAUS
- •4.2 Performing EAUS
- •4.3 EUS in Perianal Fistulas
- •4.4 Adding Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2)
- •4.5 Cryptoglandular Fistulas
- •5 Comparison with Other Diagnostic Modalities
- •5.1 Comparison with Surgery
- •5.2 Comparison with MRI
- •5.3 Perineal Ultrasound
- •6 Conclusion and Recommendation
- •References
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Imaging
- •2.1 Conventional Contrast Material-Enhanced Fistulography
- •2.2 CT
- •2.3 Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •2.3.1 Anatomy MRI
- •2.3.2 MRI Technique (Coils, Volume, and Sequences) and Findings
- •2.3.3 MRI Reconstruction Techniques and Fistulography MRI
- •2.3.4 Internal and Cutaneous Opening
- •2.3.5 Classifications of Perianal Fistulas and Abscesses
- •2.3.6 Deep Posterior Anal Fistulas and Abscess
- •2.3.7 MRI Report
- •2.3.9 MR Role in the Evaluation of the Crypto-Glandular Fistulas
- •3 Conclusion
- •4 Cross-References
- •References
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Clinical Presentation
- •3 Utility and Limitations of Endoanal Ultrasound
- •4 Conclusion
- •5 Cross-References
- •References
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Imaging
- •3 Diagnosis
- •4 MRI Technique
- •5 Disease Monitoring
- •6 Future Directions
- •7 Conclusion
- •8 Cross-References
- •References
- •14 Future Perspectives in the Diagnosis of Anal Fistula and Abscess
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Assessment of Abscess and Anal Fistula
- •3 Abscess
- •3.1 Computed Tomography (CT)
- •3.2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
- •3.3 Endoanal Ultrasound
- •3.4 Transperineal Ultrasonography (TP-US)
- •4 Anal Fistula
- •4.1 Imaging
- •4.1.1 Endoanal Ultrasound
- •4.1.2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •5 Conclusion
- •6 Cross-References
- •References
- •15 How to Drain an Abscess
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Epidemiology and Etiology
- •3 Classification
- •4 Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis
- •5 Management
- •7 Wound Dressing
- •8 Microbiology and Antibiotics
- •9 General Postoperative Management
- •10 Conclusion
- •11 Cross-References
- •References
- •16 The Seton in Anal Fistula Management
- •1 Introduction
- •2 2500 Years of Setons
- •3 To Put or Not to Put
- •4 To Cut or Not to Cut
- •5 What Kind of Seton to Use?
- •7 Seton 2.0: New Perspectives
- •8 Uncomfortable Questions (How to Do It)
- •9 What Patients Should Know
- •10 Conclusions: Seton in Guidelines
- •References
- •17 Fistulotomy
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Indications
- •3 Fistulotomy: Standard Technique
- •4 Other Fistulotomy Techniques
- •4.1 Addition of Loose Seton
- •4.2 Slow Dissection of the Sphincter: Cutting Seton
- •4.3 Addition of Marsupialization
- •5 Fistulotomy with Immediate Primary Sphincteroplasty (FIPS)
- •7 Postoperative Care
- •8 Complications and Recurrence Rate
- •9 Discussion
- •10 Conclusion
- •References
- •18 Fistulectomy
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Preoperative Evaluation
- •2.1 Patient Selection
- •2.2 Imaging
- •2.3 Physiologic Testing
- •2.4 Endoscopic Examination
- •3 Technique
- •3.1 Patient Preparation
- •3.2 Patient Positioning
- •3.2.1 Technical Steps
- •4 Postoperative Care
- •5 Results
- •5.1 Fistulectomy
- •6 Fistulectomy with Sphincter Reconstruction
- •7 Conclusions
- •References
- •19 Utility of Adding Sphincter Reconstruction to Fistulotomy/Fistulectomy
- •1 Introduction
- •2 General Classification
- •3 Preoperative Preparation
- •4 Surgical Technique Step by Step
- •5 Results
- •6 Conclusion
- •7 Cross-References
- •References
- •20 Utility of Marsupialization Following Anal Fistula Surgery
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Marsupialization
- •3 Clinical Evidence
- •4 Conclusion
- •References
- •21 Transanal Advancement Flap Repair
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Nomenclature
- •3 Effectiveness of the Technique
- •4 Effectiveness of Repeat Procedures
- •5 Impact on Fecal Continence
- •6 Severity of Incontinence
- •7 Perioperative Care
- •7.1 Bowel Preparation
- •7.2 Antibiotic Prophylaxis
- •7.3 Prolonged Antibiotic Therapy
- •7.4 Type of Anesthesia
- •7.5 Immobilization
- •7.6 Bowel Confinement
- •7.7 Stool Softeners
- •7.8 Position
- •8 Aspects of Surgical Technique
- •8.1 Preoperative Care
- •8.2 Step 1
- •8.3 Step 2
- •8.4 Step 3
- •8.5 Step 4
- •8.6 Step 5
- •8.7 Postoperative Care
- •8.8 Types of Flap
- •8.9 Shape of Flap
- •8.10 Thickness of Flap
- •8.11 Addition of Accessory Techniques
- •9 Necessity of Preoperative Imaging
- •10 Factors Contributing to Successful Healing
- •10.1 Fistula-Related Factors
- •10.2 Patient-Related Factors
- •10.3 Influence of Covering Ostomy
- •10.4 Impact of the Use of Draining Setons
- •11 Conclusion
- •References
- •22 Dermal Flap Anoplasty for Trans-sphincteric Anal Fistula
- •1 Rationale
- •2 Technique
- •3 Other Dermal Flaps
- •4 Discussion
- •5 Cross-References
- •References
- •23 (LIFT) Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract
- •References
- •24 Anal Fistula: Glue and Paste Injection
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Fibrin Glue
- •3 Collagen Paste
- •4 Conclusion
- •5 Cross-References
- •References
- •25 VAAFT
- •1 Introduction
- •1.1 VAAFT Story
- •2 Surgical Equipment and Accessories
- •3 VAAFT Indications
- •3.1 Preoperative Assessment
- •4 VAAFT Procedure
- •4.1 Diagnostic Phase (Fistuloscopy)
- •4.2 Operative Phase
- •5 Closure of the Internal Opening
- •5.1 Use of a Linear or Semicircular Stapler
- •5.2 Advancement Flap
- •5.3 Use of a Bioabsorbable Mesh (Xenograft)
- •5.4 Autologous Dermis Graft
- •5.4.1 VAAFT Associated to the LIFT Procedure
- •5.5 Postoperative Management
- •6 Discussion
- •7 Conclusions
- •References
- •26 The Laser Treatment of Anal Fistulas
- •1 Introduction
- •1.1 Literature Review
- •1.3 Diagnosis and Treatment of Complex Anal Fistulas
- •2 Materials and Methods
- •3 Conclusion
- •References
- •27 Treatment by Over-the-Scope-Clip
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Technical Background
- •3 Surgical Application
- •4 Principle of Action
- •5 Clinical Data
- •References
- •28 Stem Cells in Cryptoglandular Anal Fistulas
- •1 Introduction
- •2 History of a Novel Approach
- •2.1 Mesenchymal Stem Cells
- •2.2 Adipose Tissue: The Ideal MSCs Source
- •2.3 Adipose Tissue Graft
- •2.3.1 Lipogems
- •3 Results
- •3.1 Literature Review
- •3.2 Personal Experience
- •4 Discussion and Conclusion
- •References
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Perianal and Rectovaginal Fistulas
- •2.1 Epidemiology and Diagnosis
- •2.2 Classification
- •2.3 Treatment Modalities
- •3 Flap Reconstruction
- •3.1 Overview and Considerations for Flap Reconstruction
- •4 Gracilis Interposition Flap
- •4.1 Background and Indications
- •4.2 Operative Technique
- •4.3 Results/Complications
- •5 Martius Interposition Flap
- •5.1 History and Indications
- •5.2 Surgical Technique
- •5.3 Results/Complications
- •6 Gluteal Muscle Interposition Flap
- •6.1 History and Indications
- •6.2 Surgical Technique
- •6.3 Results/Complications
- •7 Conclusion
- •References
- •30 Quality of Life Following Anal Fistula Treatment
- •1 Introduction
- •2 Quality of Life with an Anal Fistula
- •2.1 Cryptoglandular Fistulas
- •2.3 Conclusion
- •3 Quality of Life with a Seton and a Fistula

158 R. J. F. Felt-Bersma
show a significantly higher accuracy in the evaluation of internal openings, if compared with MR (P ¼ 0.47). In the complex anal fistulas, MR showed a significantly
higher accuracy in the evaluation of secondary extensions if compared with 3D-EAUS
(P ¼ 0.041) whereas in the simple anal fistulas, no significant difference was found.
They concluded that in the preoperative workup of patients with anorectal fistulas,
3D-EAUS may represent the first-line diagnostic tool. In cases of fistulas classified as
complex by 3D-EAUS, MR may be indicated as adjunctive diagnostic imaging
examination, to more carefully describe the fistulas’ complete anatomy.
5.3 Perineal Ultrasound
Transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) is a simple and noninvasive technique used to
evaluate pelvic and perianal inflammatory diseases. It can be a useful substitute for
EAUS particularly when EAUS is not suitable for reasons of anal stricture, painful
perianal abscesses, or inaccessible lesions extending far from the anus (e.g., into the
scrotum or gluteus). The advantage of TPUS is that it is a low-cost, high-resolution,
multiplanar modality that provides real-time performance. The limitations of TPUS are
inadequate visualization of tissues that are far from the probe, due to the limited
penetration of the ultrasonic beam (usually <5–6 cm), and the presence of skin tags
or protruding anal lesions that hamper the quality of images. The learning curve in
performing TPUS is not known, but it has been recognized that most experienced
abdominal sonographers achieve competency in performing TPUS after approximately
12 exams (Stewart et al. 2001). That seems rather low and like with EAUS lying
probably around 50 examinations with proper feedback from an experienced college.
TPUS is performed with conventional probes (3.5–7MHzmicroconvexprobe),
positioned directly above the anus. Prior to the examination, the probe is prepared with
application of contact gel and a latex glove or condom, which is then also covered with
contact gel. Standard images are obtained from axial and longitudinal viewpoints over
the perineal body, above the anus. In patients with perianal fistulae, the probe can also be
placed directly on the external orifice of the fistula to follow the fistula course up to its
internal opening. Additional oblique and angled images may also be obtained to better
delineate pathology. The examination is typically well tolerated by patients, including
children and infants. The main technical features of TPUS are outlined in Fig. 15.
Several studies have compared TPUS with surgical findings or MRI and found a
good correlation (Bezzio et al. 2017). Bor et al. (2016) performed a prospective
study to compare the diagnostic accuracy of TPUS, EAUS (without H
with surgical findings in 23 patients with active perianal CD. They affirmed that the
overall diagnostic accuracy in evaluating fistulae, abscesses, and rectal involvement
of the three imaging methods was nearly identical. Thus, TPUS seems an accurate,
inexpensive, and noninvasive modality that may be used as the first step in experienced hands for evaluation of peria nal fistulizing disease. However, our impression
is that the 3D-EAUS images are self-explanatory and provide better images for
fistulas and that TPUS should be reserved for pelvic floor issues such as demonstration of dyssynergia, intussusception, and enterocele.
), and MRI
2O2

10 Endoanal Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Cryptoglandular Anal Fistulas and... 159
Fig. 15 Trans perineal ultrasound. (a) Position of the probe obtaining (b) a sagittal image (in rest)
and (c) position of the probe for transversal image (d). Note that the posterior is on top. B ¼ bladder,
U ¼ urethra, V ¼ vagina, R ¼ rectum, ARA ¼ anorectal angle. IAS ¼ internal anal sphincter
5.4 Comparison with 3D High-Resolution Anorectal Manometry
(3D-HRAM)
3D-HRAM measures anal pressures and provide a 3D pressure image of the anal
sphincters. Felt et al. (2018) performed a study in 40 patients with cryptoglandular anal
fistulas comparing the anatomical features present with 3D-EAUS with the pressure
profile with 3D-HRAM. A group of 30 patients without fistulas served as control. Four
patients had a primary fistula, 19 were previously treated with a seton/abscess drainage, and 17 had a recurrence after previously performed fistula surgery. On
3D-HRAM, 24 (60%) fistula tract areas were good and 8 (20%) moderately visible.
All but seven (18%) patients had normal mean resting pressures. The mean resting
pressure of the fistula tract area was significantly lower compared to the surrounding
area (47 vs. 76 mmHg; p < 0.0001). Using a Δ mean resting pressure 30 mmHg
difference between fistula tract area and non-fistula tract area as alternative cut-off,

160 R. J. F. Felt-Bersma
Fig. 16 Comparison EAUS and 3D HRAM. (a) normal tracing of 3D HRAM with 3D image and
the 2D frontal image cut along the anterior (Ant). Post ¼ posterior. Note that left (L) and right
(R) are switched compared to 3D EAUS. Preoperative imaging of a fistula with (b) 3D HDRAM
image and (c) 3D EAUS and postoperative 3D HRAM (d) and 3D-EAUS (e). Note that with 3D
EUAS enhanced fistula tract (f) with H
fistulotomy led to diminished pressure at the concomitant area with 3DHRAM (arrow)
(c) has changed into (e) hypoechogenic defect (d). The
2O2
21 (53%) patients were identified. In six patients 3D-HRAM was repeated after
surgery: a local pressure drop was detected in one patient after fistulotomy with
increased complaints of fecal incontinence (Fig. 16). They concluded that profound

10 Endoanal Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Cryptoglandular Anal Fistulas and... 161
local anal pressure drops are found in the fistula tract areas in patients’ normal mean
resting pressures. Fistulotomy may affect local sphincter pressure. This might influence surgical decision making in future. Prospective studies are warranted in patients
with fistula surgery to establish the clinical consequence in terms of both complaints
and anal pressures.
6 Conclusion and Recommendation
Endoanal ultrasound is a diagnostic modal ity which can accurately delineate anatomy of perianal fistulae and abscesses in both cryptoglandular and Crohn’s disease.
Results are comparable to MRI, examination under anesthesia and surgery, especially when using hydrogen peroxide as contrast enhancement. In cryptoglandular
disease EAUS should be performed in recurrent fistula as complexity can be
expected and preoperatively mapping the exact fistula pattern can help prevent
recurrence. In perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease EAUS can provide reliable end
points in the clinical assessment and has the potential to improve outcome of
patients. When more proximal fistulas or abscesses are suspected, an additional
MRI should be performed.
EAUS is a very handy tool and can easily be performed in an out-patient setting.
Practices who use EAUS can use it at their disposal and the investigation can easily
be repeated after surgery when necessary or in Crohn’s disease to evaluate the
fistulas or abscesses after treatment, without a waiting list for MRI. Compared to
MRI, it is less expensive. Gastroenterologist, surgeons, and radiologists can perform
EUS. Affinity and dedication toward the EUS is mandatory for a good quality.
References
Abcarian H (2011) Anorectal infection: abscess-fistula. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 24:14–21
Alabiso ME, Iasiello F, Pellino G, Iacomino A, Roberto L, Pinto A, Riegler G, Selvaggi F, Reginelli
A (2016) 3D-EAUS and MRI in the activity of anal fistulas in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterol
Res Pract 2016:1895694. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1895694. Epub 2015 Dec 27. PMID:
26819596; PMCID: PMC4706885
Almeida IS, Jayarajah U, Wickramasinghe DP et al (2019) Value of three-dimensional endoanal
ultrasound scan (3D-EAUS) in preoperative assessment of fistula-in-ano. BMC Res Notes 12:66
Becker A, Koltun L, Sayfan J (2006) Simple clinical examination predicts complexity of perianal
fistula. Color Dis 8:601–604
Benjelloun EB, Souiki T, El Abkari M (2014) Endoanal ultrasound in anal fistulas. Is there any
influence on postoperative outcome? Tech Coloproctol 18:405–406
Bezzio C, Bryant RV, Manes G et al (2017) New horizons in the imaging of perianal Crohn’s
disease: transperineal ultrasonography. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:523–530
Blom J, Nyström PO, Gunnarsson U et al (2011) Endoanal ultrasonography may distinguish
Crohn’s anal fistulae from cryptoglandular fistulae in patients with Crohn’s disease: a cross-
sectional study. Tech Coloproctol 15:327–330
Bor R, Farkas K, Bálint A et al (2016) Prospective comparison of magnetic resonance imaging,
transrectal and transperineal sonography, and surgical findings in complicated perianal Crohn
disease. J Ultrasound Med 35:2367–2372

162 R. J. F. Felt-Bersma
Brillantino A, Iacobellis F, Reginelli A et al (2019) Preoperative assessment of simple and complex
anorectal fistulas: tridimensional endoanal ultrasound? Magnetic resonance? Both? Radiol Med
124:339–349
Burnett SJ, Bartram CI (1991) Endosonographic variations in the normal internal anal sphincter. Int
J Color Dis 6:2–4
Cheong DM, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD et al (1993) Anal endosonography for recurrent anal fistulas:
image enhancement with hydrogen peroxide. Dis Colon Rectum 36:1158–1160
Choen S, Burnett S, Bartram CI et al (1991) Comparison between anal endosonography and digital
examination in the evaluation of anal fistulae. Br J Surg 78:445–447
Deen KI, Williams JG, Hutchinson R, Keighley MR, Kumar D (1994) Fistulas in ano: endoanal
ultrasonographic assessment assists decision making for surgery. Gut 35(3):391–394. https://
doi.org/10.1136/gut.35.3.391. PMID: 8150354; PMCID: PMC1374597
Ding J-H, Bi L-X, Zhao K et al (2015) Impact of three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound on the
outcome of anal fistula surgery: a prospective cohort study. Color Dis 17:1104–1112
Eglinton TW, Barclay ML, Gearry RB et al (2012) The spectrum of perianal Crohn’s disease in a
population-based cohort. Dis Colon Rectum 55:773–777
Emile SH, Magdy A, Youssef M et al (2017) Utility of endoanal ultrasonography in assessment of
primary and recurrent anal fistulas and for detection of associated anal sphincter defects. J
Gastrointest Surg 21:1879–1887
Felt-Bersma RJF, Vlietstra MS, Vollebregt PF et al (2018) 3D high-resolution anorectal manometry
in patients with perianal fistulas: comparison with 3D-anal ultrasound. BMC Gastroenterol 1:44
Gustafsson UM, Kahvecioglu B, Astrom G et al (2001) Endoanal ultrasound or magnetic resonance
imaging for preoperative assessment of anal fistula: a comparative study. Color Dis 3:189–197
Kołodziejczak M, Santoro GA, Obcowska A et al (2017) Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound is
accurate and reproducible in determining type and height of anal fistulas. Color Dis 19:378–384
Law PJ, Bartram CI (1989) Anal endosonography: technique and normal anatomy gastrointest.
Radiol 14:349–353
Law PJ, Talbot RW, Bartram CI et al (1989) Anal endosonography in the evaluation of perianal
sepsis and fistula in ano. Br J Surg 76:752–755
Luglio G, Giglio MC, Rispo A et al (2018) Diagnostic accuracy of 3-dimensional endoanal
ultrasound in identifying perianal Crohn’s fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 61:831–837
Murad-regadas SM, Regadas Filho FSP, Holanda EC et al (2018) Three-dimensional anorectal
ultrasonography be included as a diagnostic tool for the assessment of anal fistula before and
after surgical treatment? Arq Gastroenterol 55 suppl:118–124
Murad-Regadas SM, Regadas FSP, Rodrigues LV et al (2010) The role of 3-dimensional anorectal
ultrasonography in the assessment of anterior transsphincteric fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 53:
1035–1040
Navarro-Luna A, Garcia-Domingo MI, Rius-Macias J et al (2004) Ultrasound study of anal fi
with hydrogen peroxide enhancement. Dis Colon Rectum 47:108–114
Nielsen MB, Hauge C, Rasmussen OO, Sorensen M et al (1992) Anal sphincter size measured by
endosonography in healthy volunteers. Effect of age, sex, and parity. Acta Radiol 33:453–456
Papachrysostomou M, Pye SD, Wild SR et al (1994) Significance of the thickness of the anal
sphincters with age and its relevance in faecal incontinence. Scand J Gastroenterol 29:710–714
Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD (1976) A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 63:1–12
Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA et al (1999) Anal endosonography in haemorrhoidal
disease: do anatomical changes have clinical implications? Color Dis 1:146–150
Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJF, Eijsbouts QA et al (1998a) Hydrogen peroxide-enhanced transanal
ultrasound in the assessment of fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 41:1147–1152
Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA et al (1998b) Vaginal endosonography of the anal sphincter
complex is important in the assessment of faecal incontinence and perianal sepsis. Br J Surg
853:359–363
Ratto C, Gentile E, Merico M et al (2000) How can the assessment of fistula-inano be improved?
Dis Colon Rectum 43:1375–1382
stulas

10 Endoanal Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Cryptoglandular Anal Fistulas and... 163
Ratto C, Grillo E, Parello A et al (2005) Endoanal ultrasound-guided surgery for anal fistula.
Endoscopy 37:722–728
Roig JV, García-Armengol J, Jordán JC, Moro D, García-Granero E, Alós R (2010) Fistulectomy
and sphincteric reconstruction for complex cryptoglandular fistulas. Colorectal Dis 12(7
Online):e145–e152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02002.x. Epub 2009 Jul 9.
PMID: 19604292
Rosa G, Lolli P, Piccinelli D et al (2006) Fistula in ano: anatomoclinical aspects, surgical therapy
and results in 844 patients. Tech Coloproctol 10:215–221
Siddiqui MR, Ashrafian H, Tozer P et al (2012) A diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of endoanal
ultrasound and MRI for perianal fistula assessment. Dis Colon Rectum 55:576–585
Sloots CE, Felt-Bersma RJ, Poen AC et al (2001a) Assessment and classification of never operated
and recurrent cryptoglandular fistulas-in-ano using hydrogen peroxide enhanced transanal
ultrasound. Color Dis 3:422–426
Sloots CE, Felt-Bersma RJ, Poen AC, Cuesta MA et al (2001b) Assessment and classification of
fistula-in-ano in patients with Crohn’s disease by hydrogen peroxide enhanced transanal ultra-
sound. Int J Color Dis 16:292–297
Spencer JA, Chapple K, Wilson D et al (1998) Outcome after surgery for perianal fistula: predictive
value of MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:403–406
Stewart LK, McGee J, Wilson SR (2001) Transperineal and transvaginal sonography of perianal
inflammatory disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:627–632
Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN et al (1994) Endosonography of the anal sphincters: normal
anatomy and comparison with manometry. Clin Radiol 49:368–374
Sultan AH, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA et al (1993) Anal endosonography and correlation with in vitro
and in vivo anatomy. Br J Surg 80:508–511
Tantiphlachiva K, Sahakitrungruang C, Pattanaarun J et al (2019) Effects of preoperative endoanal
ultrasound on functional outcome after anal fistula surgery. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 6:e000279
Van Assche G, Dignass A, Panes J et al (2010) The second European evidence-based consensus on
the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease: special situations. J Crohns Colitis 4:3–101
van Bodegraven AA, Sloots CEJ, Felt-Bersma RJF et al (2002) Endosonographic evidence of
persistence of Crohn’s disease-associated fistulas after infliximab treatment, irrespective of
clinical response. Dis Colon Rectum 45:39–45
Vander Mijnsbrugge GJH, Felt-Bersma RJF, Ho DKF et al (2019) Perianal fistulas and the lift
procedure: results, predictive factors for success, and long-term results with subsequent treat-
ment. Tech Coloproctol 23:639–647
Weisman N, Abbas MA (2008) Prognostic value of endoanal ultrasound for fistula-in-ano: a
retrospective analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1089–1092
West RL, van der Woude CJ, Hansen BE et al (2004) Clinical and endosonographic effect of
ciprofloxacin on the treatment of perianal fistulae in Crohn’s disease with infliximab: a double-
blind placebo-controlled study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 20:1329–1336
Zawadzki A, Starck M, Bohe M et al (2012) Unique 3D endoanal ultrasound feature of perianal
Crohn’s fistula: the ‘Crohn ultrasound fistula sign’. Color Dis 14:e608–e611
Zbar AP, Horesh N, Bucholtz V, Zmora O, Beer-Gabel M, Carter D (2013) Are there specific
endosonographic features in Crohn’s patients with perianal fistulae? J Crohns Colitis 7(6):490–
496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crohns.2012.07.024. Epub 2012 Aug 21. PMID: 22921529

Magnetic Resonance and Traditional
Radiology in the Diagnosis
11
of Cryptoglandular Anal Fistula
and Abscess
Laura Maria Minordi, Luigi Larosa, Antonio Bevere,
Giovanni Cimino, and Riccardo Manfredi
Contents
1 Introduction . ............... .................................................................. 166
2 Imaging ...... . ................. ........................................................ ...... 168
2.1 Conventional Contrast Material-Enhanced Fistulography ............................ 168
2.2 CT...................................................................................... 168
2.3 Magnetic Resonance Imaging . ........................................................ 171
3 Conclusion ................................................................................... 190
4 Cross-References .......................... ............................................. ..... 190
References ............................ ............................................... ............ 190
Abstract
Perianal fistula is an inflammatory condition, which refers to an anomalous
connection between the anal canal and the skin of the perineum. It usually affects
young adults, and it is more common in men than in women. Most anal fistulae
are cryptogenic in origin (90.4%); in the other cases, they occur together with
predisposing conditions such as pelvic tumors (4.8%), previous pelvic surgery or
trauma (3.3%), Crohn’s disease (1.3%), and tuberculosis (0.2%). Infection caused
by the obstruction of the anal crypts is the most plausible pathogenic mechanism
L. M. Minordi (*) · L. Larosa
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radiologia Diagnostica e
Interventistica Generale, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed
Ematologia, Rome, Italy
e-mail: lauramaria.minordi@policlinicogemelli.it
A. Bevere · G. Cimino
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Radiologia, Rome, Italy
R. Manfredi
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radiologia Diagnostica e
Interventistica Generale, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed
Ematologia, Rome, Italy
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Radiologia, Rome, Italy
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022
C. Ratto et al. (eds.), Anal Fistula and Abscess, Coloproctology,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76670-2_13
165

166 L. M. Minordi et al.
in cryptogenic perianal fistulas. Offering the lowest resistance pathway, the
infection begins in the inter-sphincteric space, where it may spread relatively
rapidly into adjacent anatomical compartments. The first radiological exam used
to study perianal fistulas was contrast material-enhanced fistulography. This
technique was limited by the inability to evaluate the anal sphincter complex,
secondary extensions of the fistula, as well as relevant anatomic compartments
and muscles. MR imaging is the most accurate method for determining the
presence and assessing the course of anal fistulas due to its high soft tissue
contrast and multiplanar ability, allowing high accuracy of up to 93%, and it
may also help to reduce recurrence after surgery.
Keywords
Perianal fistula · Anal canal · Cryptogenic fistulas · Abscess · MR imaging
1 Introduction
Perianal fistula is an inflammatory condition, which refers to an anomalous connection between the anal canal and the skin of the perineum. It usually affects young
adults, and it is more common in men than in women (Balcı et al. 2019).
Nonspecific cryptogenic fistulas are by far the most common type of fistula,
representing 90.4% of the total cases and having a prevalence estimated to be
approximately 10 per 100,000 of the general population (Dwarkasing et al. 2005;
Balcı et al. 2019). In the other cases, they are associated with predisposing conditions such as pelvic tumors (4.8%), previous pelvic surgery or trauma (3.3%),
Crohn’s disease (1.3%), and tuberculosis (0.2%) (Baskan et al. 2014).
A correct comprehension of anorectal anatomy is crucial for understanding the
pathological mechanism of the cryptogenic anal fistulas. The anal canal is approximately 3–4.5 cm long. The upper two thirds and the lower one third of the anal canal
are separated by the dentate line, which marks the transition from columnar epithelium to the stratified squamous epithelium. The anal sphincter is made up of a double
ring, the muscle internal sphincter, and the muscle external sphincter, as well as the
puborectalis sling arising from the levator ani musculature. The internal sphincter is
involuntary and is formed by smooth muscle continuous with the circular smooth
muscle of the rectum. It is responsible for 85% of anal tone at rest. A division of the
internal sphincter usually does not cause a loss of continence. The external sphincter
is formed by striated muscle, and it contributes only 15% of resting anal tone, but its
strong voluntary contractions oppose defecation. Its division can lead to incontinence. The area located between the internal and external sphincters is called intersphincteric space, which extends from the para-rectal intramural space to the perianal
subcutaneous space. The ischiorectal space, located in the buttock, is confined
medially by the external sphincter, superiorly by the levator ani muscle, and inferiorly by the skin. The supra-levator space lies above the levator muscles, next to the
rectum (Morris et al. 2000).

11 Magnetic Resonance and Traditional Radiology in the Diagnosis of... 167
Chiari (1878) described the anal glands, branched glandular structures with a
stratified columnar epithelium lining, approximately six to ten in number, usually
more numerous in men than in women. These glands are equally allocated around
the circumference of the anal canal, with their ducts opening into the base of the
crypts of Morgagni, and are situated above the anal valves at the level of the dentate
line (de Miguel Criado et al. 2012). The majority of the glands are subepithelial, with
some located in the longitudinal layer of the internal sphincter, although others may
terminate in the inter-sphincteric space, next to the external sphincter (de Miguel
Criado et al. 2012). Infection caused by the obstruction of the anal crypts is the most
plausible pathogenic mechanism in cryptogenic perianal fistulas (Abou-Zeid 2011;
Sneider and Maykel 2013; Balcı et al. 2019). The infection begins in the intersphincteric space, where it may spread relatively rapidly into adjacent anatomical
compartments (Abou-Zeid 2011; Sneider and Maykel 2013; Balcı et al. 2019). In
particular, an abscess growing in a superficial gland could spontaneousl y discharge
into the anal canal (de Miguel Criado et al. 2012). However, the rupture of an abscess
located deep to the internal sphincter, which can serve as a barrier, results in pus
traveling along the inter-sphincteric space, which represents the path with the least
resistance; from this site it reaches the skin, forming an inter-sphincteric fistula
(Parks 1961). Alternatively, a trans-sphincteric fistula forms when the infection
passes through both layers of the external sphincter, and a supra-sphincteric fistula
forms when the infection spreads around the entire external sphincter and part of the
levator ani to reach the ischiorectal fossa (Parks 1961). The infection can reach the
perianal skin where it can drain itself (Abou-Zeid 2011; Balcı et al. 2019).
The most common fistulas are the inter-sphincteric (40–70%) and the trans-sphincteric (20–40%) fistulas. In a minority of cases (5–15%), the infection spreads upward in
the ischiorectal fossa, over the sphincter (supra-sphincteric fistulization) (de Parades et al.
2010). Sepsis originating within the pelvis may extend to the skin through the ischiorectal
fossa, resulting in an extra-sphincteric or trans-levator fistula (Morris et al. 2000).
Abscess cavities may develop along the course of fistulous tracks; therefore,
inter-sphincteric fistulas can lead to the development of a perianal abscess or an
abscess encysted within the inter-sphincteric space. Trans-sphincteric fistulas are
typically correlated with ischiorectal fossa abscesses. Supra-levator abscesses are the
least common, about 8% of the total. They are classified on basis of anatomical
locations (retrorectal, recto-vesical, rectovaginal, pelvi-rectal) and can spread into
the abdominal preperitoneal or retroperitoneal spaces (Morris et al. 2000).
The most frequent presenting symptom is skin secretions from the cutaneous
opening of the tract (Balcı et al. 2019).
A fistula having a separate track and a separate internal openin g and which exists
simultaneously with the original fistula is called a synchronous fistula. Synchronous
fistulas are general ly rare, and they differentiate from a branching fistula where all
branches eventually converge into a single internal opening. Synchronous fistulas
don’t necessarily have an external opening, and they may or may not have an
external opening (Abou-Zeid 2011).
Treatment goals are to eliminate the fistula tracts and to prevent recurrence while
avoiding fecal incontinence. However, complete and lasting eradication of the

168 L. M. Minordi et al.
disease is hardly achieved. Simple fistulas, involving <30% of the sphincter complex, are relatively easier to manage and have a lower risk of fecal incontinence. The
approach to complex fistulas is more difficult as they involve >30% of the sphincter
complex, resulting in a higher risk of recurrence and fecal incontinence (Machielsen
et al. 2020). For these reasons optimal management of perianal fistulas requires a
detailed preoperative planning, including a precise assessment of the fistula’s characteristics (such as detection and direction of the internal opening and the evaluations of the extent of ramifications) (Baik et al. 2017). It is fundamental to have
accurate radiological information to plan the most appropriate surgical approach and
decrease the risk of recurrence (Baik et al. 2017). Variations of the anatomy of the
fistula or the integrity of the anal canal can result in difficulties during anal fistulas
surgery (Abou-Zeid 2011). Therefore, the best way to reduce the recurrence rate is to
localize the correct internal opening preoperatively (Abou-Zeid 2011).
2 Imaging
2.1 Conventional Contrast Material-Enhanced Fistulography
The first radiological exam used to study perianal fistulas was contrast materialenhanced fistulography, which requires the injection of water-soluble contrast from
the external opening of the fistula.
A retrospective study investigated the reliability of fistulography, assessing
images from 25 patients. The correct diagnosis was achieved in only 16% of the
patients, demonstrating the inaccuracy of this imaging modality (Kuijpers and
Schulpen 1985).
When compared with operative findings, fistulography was unreliable, with only
16% concordance and 12% of false-positive findings of high extensions and rectal
openings (Halligan and Stoker 2006; Jordán et al. 2010).
This technique suffers some major drawbacks. First, the contrast may fail to reach
and fill the farthest extensions of the fistula, as well as the areas which may be
plugged with debris, or if there is an excessive contrast reflux from the internal or
external openings. Second, there is not a direc t visualization of the sphincter muscles
and the pelvic floor, which means that it is difficult to establish the relationship
between the adjacent structures and the fistula. For example, it is frequently very
hard to decide whether a visualized extension is supra-levator or in the roof of the
ischioanal fossa (i.e., infra-levator). Ultimately, fistulography can be arduous to
interpret.
2.2 CT
Computed tomog raphy (CT) is an efficient, readily available diagnostic method,
useful especially to study older patients and those who present with acute manifestations in the emergency department (Khati et al. 2015; Guniganti et al. 2017). These
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
