Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5603_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
23 Мб
Скачать
22
4. A. Datta, A. Kumar, A. Kumar, A. Kumar, V. P. Singh, Advanced materials in biological implants and surgical tools, Advanced Materials for Biomedical Applications, 21–43, 2022, CRC Press Boca Raton, FL, USA.
5. A.Kumar, A.Datta, A.Kumar, A.Kumar, Recent advancements and future trends in next­generation materials for biomedical applications, Advanced materials for biomedical applica­tions, 19-Jan, 2022, CRC Press.
6. S.D. Leventini, B. S. Martin-Gutierrez, A.Kumar, A.S. Mittman, S. M. Kim, A.Martini, Tactile Perception of Vellum Quantied by Friction and Surface Roughness, Tribology Letters, 70, 4, 127, 2022, Springer US NewYork.
7. A. Kumar, M. Byadwal, A. Kumar, A. Kumar, F. L. M. King, Laser Micromachining in Biomedical Industry, Laser-based Technologies for Sustainable Manufacturing, 38, 2023, CRC Press.
8. A. Pathak, A. Kumar, A. Kumar, A. Kumar, Application of Laser Technology in the Mechanical and Machine Manufacturing Industry, Laser-based Technologies for Sustainable Manufacturing, 107–155, 2023, CRC Press.
9. A.Kumar, A.Pathak, A. Kumar, A. Kumar, Physics of Laser–Matter Interaction in Laser­Based Manufacturing, Laser-based Technologies for Sustainable Manufacturing, 45–54, 2023, CRC Press.
10. A. Kumar, A. Kumar, A Kumar, Introduction to Optics and Laser-Based Manufacturing Technologies, Laser-based Technologies for Sustainable Manufacturing, 2023, 43, CRC Press.
11. A. K. Mehra, R. Saini, A. Kumar, The effect of bre contents on mechanical and mois­ture absorption properties of gourd sponge/coir bre reinforced epoxy hybrid composites, Composites Communications, 25, 100732, 2021, Elsevier.
12. Kumar A, Datta S, Kalyanasundaram D (2016) Permeability and effective slip in conned ows transverse to wall slippage patterns. Phys Fluids 28.
13. Kumar A, Datta S, Kalyanasundaram D (2018) Liquid Slippage in Conned Flows: Effect of Periodic Micropatterns of Arbitrary Pitch and Amplitude. J Heat Transfer 140.
14. Kumar A, Datta S, Kalyanasundaram D (2016) Liquid slippage in con ned ows: effect of periodic micropatterns of arbitrary pitch and amplitude. In: ASME 2016 5th Micro/Nanoscale Heat and Mass Transfer International Conference (MNHMT2016), Biopolis, Singapore.
15. Kumar A, Gupta A, Kant R, Akhtar SN, Tiwari N, Ramkumar J, Bhattacharya S (2013) Optimization of laser machining process for the preparation of photomasks, and its application to microsystems fabrication. J Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, MOEMS 12.
16. Kumar A, Panda U (2022) Microuidics-based devices and their role on point-of-care testing. In: Biosensor Based Advanced Cancer Diagnostics. Elsevier, pp197–224.
17. Kumar A, Panda U, Patel VK, Kant R (2022) Laser-Assisted Fabrication of Polymers by Pushing Down the Limit of Resolution. Trends Fabr Polym Polym Compos 1–3.
18. Kumar A, Parihar A, Basha SN, Panda U (2022) Clinically available/under trial drugs and vaccines for treatment of SARS-COV-2. In: Computational Approaches for Novel Therapeutic and Diagnostic Designing to Mitigate SARS-CoV2 Infection. Elsevier, pp451–488.
19. Kumar A, Parihar A, Panda U, Parihar DS (2022) Microuidics-based point-of-care testing (POCT) devices in dealing with waves of COVID-19 pandemic: The emerging solution. ACS Appl Bio Mater 5:2046–2068.
20. Kumar A, Sharma AK, Katiyar JK (2023) State-of-the-Art in Sustainable Machining of Different Materials Using Nano Minimum Quality Lubrication (NMQL). Lubricants 11:64.
21. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (1969). Friction, Wear and Lubrication, Tribology, Glossary of terms and denitions in the eld of friction, wear and lubrication tribology, OECD.
22. Greenwood, J. A., & Williamson, J. B. P. (1966). Contact of nominally at surfaces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, 295, 300–319.
23. Myshkin, N.K., & Kovalev, A. V. (2009). Adhesion and friction of polymers. In Polymer tribology (pp.3–37). Imperial College Press.
A. Kumar et al.
1 Introduction toBiotribology: AScience ofSurface Interaction
24. W.Hunter, Of the structure and diseases of articulating cartilages, Philos. Trans. R.Soc. Lond. 42 (1743) 514–521.
25. A. Unsworth, Tribology of human and articial joints, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H 205(3) (1991)163–172.
26. B.A. Hills, Boundary lubrication invivo, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H 214 (1) (2000)83–94.
27. J.Katta, Z.Jin, E.Ingham, J.Fisher, Biotribology of articular cartilage—a review of the recent advances, Med. Eng. Phys. 30 (10) (2008) 1349–1363.
28. G.A. Ateshian, The role of interstitial uid pressurization in articular cartilage lubrication, J.Biomech. 42 (9) (2009) 1163–1176.
29. T. Murakami, H.Higaki, Y.Sawae, N.Ohtsuki, S.Moriyama, Y.Nakanishi, Adaptive multi­mode lubrication in natural synovial joints and articial joints, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H 212 (1) (1998) 23–35.
30. C. W. Mccutchen, Mechanism of animal joints: songe-hydrostatic and weeping bearing, Nature 184 (4695) (1959) 1284–1285.
31. H.Forster, J.Fisher, The inuence of loading time and lubricant on the friction of articular cartilage, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H 210 (2) (1996) 109–119.
32. Z.M.Jin, J.E.Pickard, H.Forster, E.Ingham, J.Fisher, Frictional behaviour of bovine articular cartilage, Biorheology 37 (1–2) (2000) 57–63.
33. G.D. Jay, K.A. Waller, The biology of lubricin: near frictionless joint motion, Matrix Biol. 39 C (2014) 17–24.
34. M.Daniel, Boundary cartilage lubrication: review of current concepts, Wien. Med. Wochenschr. 164 (5–6) (2014) 88–94.
35. Nobuo Sakai, Yuichiro Hagihara, Tsukasa Furusawa, etal., Analysis of biphasic lubrication of articular cartilage loaded by cylindrical indenter, Tribol. Int. 46(1) (2012)225–236.
36. A.C. Moore, D.L.Burris, An analytical model to predict interstitial lubrication of cartilage in migrating contact areas, J.Biomech. 47 (1) (2014)148–153.
37. Y.Dabiri, L.P. Li, Inuences of the depth-dependent material inhomogeneity of articular carti­lage on the uid pressurization in the human knee, Med. Eng. Phys. 35(11) (2013)1591–1598.
38. G.A.Ateshian, S.Maas, J.A.Weiss, Finite element algorithm for frictionless contact of porous permeable media under nite deformation and sliding, J.Biomech. Eng. 132 (6) (2010) 061006.
39. Q.Meng, Z.Jin, J.Fisher, R.Wilcox, Comparison between FEBio and Abaqus for biphasic contact problems, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H 227(9) (2013)1009–1019.
40. J.Li, X.Hua, Z.Jin, J.Fisher, R.K. Wilcox, Inuence of clearance on the time-dependent per­formance of the hip following hemiarthroplasty: a nite element study with biphasic acetabu­lar cartilage properties, Med. Eng. Phys. (14) (2014)00140–00144pii:S1350-4533.
41. J.Li, X.Hua, Z.Jin, J.Fisher, R.K. Wilcox, Biphasic investigation of contact mechanics in natural human hips during activities, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H 228(6) (2014)556–563.
42. Q. Meng, et al., Computational investigation of the time-dependent contact behaviour of the human tibiofemoral joint under bodyweight, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H 228 (11) (2014) 1193–1207.
43. E.Oral, A.Neils, O.K. Muratoglu, High vitaminE content, impact resistant UHMWPE blend without loss of wear resistance, J.Biomed. Mater. Res. B: Appl. Biomater. (2014).
44. J.J. Halma, J.Señaris, D.Delfosse, R.Lerf, T.Oberbach, S.M. vanGaalen, A. deGast, Edge loading does not increase wear rates of ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-polyethylene articu­lations, Biomed. Mater. Res. B: Appl. Biomater. 102 (8) (2014) 1627–1638.
45. A.Rajpura, D.Kendoff, T.N. Board, The current state of bearing surfaces into tal hip replace­ment, Bone Joint J. 96-B (2) (2014) 147–156.
46. J.Fisher, D.Dowson, Tribology of total articial joints, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H 205 (2) (1991) 73–79.
47. A. Unsworth, Recent developments in the tribology of articial joints, Tribol. Int. 28(7) (1995)485–495.
48. Z.M. Jin, J.B. Medley, D.Dowson, Fluid lm lubrication in articial hip joints, Tribol. Ser. 41 (2003) 237–256.
23
24
49. E. Ingham, J. Fisher, The role of macrophages in osteolysis of total joint replacement, Biomaterials 26 (11) (2005) 1271–1286.
50. J. Fisher, Z. Jin, J. Tipper, M. Stone, E. Ingham, Tribology of alternative bearings, Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 453 (2006) 25–34.
51. J.Fisher, L.M. Jennings, A.L. Galvin, Z.M. Jin, M.H. Stone, E.Ingham, 2009 Knee Society Presidential Guest Lecture: polyethylene wear in total knees, Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 468(1) (2010)12–18.
52. G.Pezzotti, K. Yamamoto, Articial hip joints: the biomaterials challenge, J.Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 31 (2014) 3–20.
53. A. Wang, A.Essner, R.Klein, Effect of contact stress on friction and wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene in total hip replacement, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H 215(2) (2001)133–142.
54. A.Abdelgaied, C. L. Brockett, F.Liu, L.M. Jennings, Z.Jin, J.Fisher, The effect of insert conformity and material on total knee replacement wear, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H 228 (1) (2014) 98–106.
55. Eli W.Patten, Douglas Van Citters, Michael D.Ries, Lisa A.Pruitt, Quantifying cross-shear under translation, rolling, and rotation, and its effect on UHMWPE wear, Wear 313(1–2) (2014)125–134.
56. K. Subramanyan, M. Misra, S. Mukherjee, K. Ananthapadmanabhan, Advances in the materials science of skin: a composite structure with multiple functions, MRS Bull. 32(10) (2007)770–778.
57. M.Adams, B.Briscoe, S.Johnson, Friction and lubrication of human skin, Tribol. Lett. 26(3) (2007)239–253.
58. M.A. Meyers, P.-Y.Chen, A.Y.-M.Lin, Y.Seki, Biological materials: structure and mechani­cal properties, Prog. Mater. Sci. 53 (1) (2008) 1–206.
59. D.F.Moore, The Friction and Lubrication of Elastomers, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1972.
60. D. Dowson, Tribology and the skin surface, in: K.-P. Wilhelm, P. Elsner, E. Berardesca, H.I. Maibach (Eds.), Bioengineering of the Skin: Skin Surface Imaging and Analysis, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1997, pp.159–179.
61. L.J. Wolfram, Friction of skin, J.Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 34 (8) (1983) 465–476.
62. S. A. Johnson, D. M. Gorman, M. J. Adams, B. J. Briscoe, The friction and lubrication of human stratum corneum, in: D. Dowson et al.(Ed.), Tribology Series—Thin Films in Tribology, Proceedings of the 19th Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology held at the Institute of Tribology, University of Leeds, vol. 25, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1993, pp.663–672.
63. A.A. Koudine, M.Barquins, P.H. Anthoine, L.Aubert, J.L. Leveque, Frictional properties of skin: proposal of a new approach, Int. J.Cosmet. Sci. 22(1) (2000)11–20.
64. C.Pailler-Mattei, H.Zahouani, Study of adhesion forces and mechanical properties of human skin invivo, J.Adhes. Sci. Technol. 18 (15–16) (2004)1739–1758.
65. A.Derler, L.-C.Gerhardt, Tribology of skin: review and analysis of experimental results for the friction coefcient of human skin, Tribol. Lett. 45(2011)1–27.
66. L.-C.Gerhardt, A.Lenz, N.D.Spencer, T. Munzer, S.Derler, Skin textile friction and skin elasticity in young and aged persons, Skin Res. Technol. 15(3) (2009)288–298.
67. R.K. Sivamani, J.Goodman, N.V. Gitis, H.I. Maibach, Coefcient of friction: tribological studies in man—an overview, Skin Res. Technol. 9 (3) (2003)227–234.
68. N.Gitis, R.Sivamani, Tribometrology of skin, Tribol. Trans. 47 (4) (2004)461–469.
69. L.H. Mair, T.A. Stolarski, R.W. Vowles, C.H. Lloyd, Wear: mechanisms, manifestations and measurement. Report of a workshop, J.Dent. 24 (1996)141–148.
70. X.Hu, A.C. Shortall, P.M. Marquis, Wear of dental composites under different testing condi­tions, J.Oral Rehabil. 29(2002)764–765.
71. P.V. Antunes, A.Ramalho, Study of abrasive resistance of composites for dental restoration by ball-cratering, Wear 255 (2003) 990–998.
A. Kumar et al.
1 Introduction toBiotribology: AScience ofSurface Interaction
72. G.T. Kluemper, D.G. Hiser, M.K. Rayens, M.J. Jay, Efcacy of a wax containing benzo­caine in the relief of oral mucosal pain caused by orthodontic appliances, J.Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 122 (2002) 359–365.
73. L.A. Litonjua, S.Andreana, P.T. Bush, R.E. Cohen, Toothbrushing and gingival recession, Int. Dent. J. 53(2) (2003)67–72.
74. Chakraborty, S.; Gupta, A. K.; Roy, D.; Basumallick, A.Studies on Nano-Metal Dispersed Cu-Cr Matrix Composite. Materials Letters 2019, 257 (September), 126739. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.126739.
75. Roy, D.; Gupta, A.K.; Alam, S.; Srikanth, S.; Jha, B.K. Enhancement of Properties of Micro­Alloyed Low-Carbon Ni-Added Steel by Thermomechanical Treatment. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665- 020- 05311- w.
76. Chakraborty, S.; Gupta, A. K.; Roy, D.; Basu Mallick, A. Nanomechanical Properties of Mechanically Alloyed and Spark Plasma Sintered W-Nanoparticulate Dispersed Cu-Nb Alloys. Materials Letters 2020, 274, 128004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.128004.
77. Gupta, A. K.; Mallik, B.; Roy, D. Materials Performance and Characterization Structure Property Correlation of In Situ Reinforced Al–Based Metal Matrix Composite via Stir Casting Structure Property Correlation of In Situ Reinforced Al–Based Metal Matrix Composite via Stir Casting. 2020, 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.1520/MPC20190038.
78. Roy, D.; Pal, S.; Tiwary, C.S.; Gupta, A.K.; Babu, P.N.; Mitra, R. Stable Nanocrystalline Structure Attainment and Strength Enhancement of Cu Base Alloy Using Bi-Modal Distributed Tungsten Dispersoids. Philosophical Magazine 2021, 0 (0), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.108
0/14786435.2021.1988173.
79. Roy, D.; Chakraborty, S.; Gupta, A. K.; BasuMallick, A.; Scattergood, R. O.; Koch, C.C. Synergistic Effect of Nb and Zr Additions on the Structure-Property Relationships of Nanocrystalline Cu Processed by Mechanical Alloying and Hot Pressing. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 2021, 854, 157174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157174.
80. Roy, D.; Chakraborty, S.; Gupta, A.K.; Basu Mallick, A.; Koch, C.C. Synergistic Effect of Nb and Zr Addition in Thermal Stabilization of Nano-Crystalline Cu Synthesized by Ball Milling. Materials Letters 2020, 271, 127780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.127780.
81. Soumya Mandal, Ashish Kumar Gupta, Elena Echeverria, David N. McIlroy, Jonathan D.Poplawsky, R.Sachan. Laser-Assisted Nanofabrication of Multielement Complex Oxide. Materials & Design 2022, 220, 110882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110882.
82. Gupta, A.K.; Gupta, S.; Mandal, S.; Sachan, R.Laser Irradiation-Induced Nanoscale Surface Transformations in Strontium Titanate. 2022, 1–12.
83. Gupta, A. K.; Gupta, S.; Sachan, R. Laser Irradiation Induced Atomic Structure Modications in Strontium Titanate. JOM 2022, 74 (1), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s11837- 021- 04996- 1.
84. Kumar A, Shrama AK, Gupta TVK, Katiyar JK (2022) Inuence of hexagonal boron nitride additive nanocutting uid on the machining of AA6061-T6 alloy using minimum quality lubri­cation. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng 09544089221110980.
85. Kumar S, Verma RK, Kumar A, Patel VK (2022) Importance of Chemically Treated Natural Fibers in the Fabrication of Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites. Trends Fabr Polym Polym Compos 10–11.
86. Parihar A, Kumar A, Panda U, Khan R, Parihar DS, Khan R (2023) Cryopreservation: A Comprehensive Overview, Challenges, and Future Perspectives. Adv Biol 2200285.
87. Parihar A, Pandita V, Kumar A, Parihar DS, Puranik N, Bajpai T, Khan R (2021) 3D Printing: Advancement in Biogenerative Engineering to Combat Shortage of Organs and Bioapplicable Materials. Regen Eng Transl Med 1–27.
88. Parmar V, Kumar A, Mani Sankar M, Datta S, Vijaya Prakash G, Mohanty S, Kalyanasundaram D (2018) Oxidation facilitated antimicrobial ability of laser micro-textured titanium alloy against gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus for biomedical applications. J Laser Appl 30.
25
26
89. Parmar V, Kumar A, Prakash GV, Datta S, Kalyanasundaram D (2019) Investigation, model­ling and validation of material separation mechanism during ber laser machining of medical grade titanium alloy Ti6Al4V and stainless steel SS316L.Mech Mater 137.
90. Singh M, Kumar A, Khan AR (2020) Capillary as a liquid diode. Phys Rev Fluids 5:102101.
91. Singh RK, Kumar A, Kant R, Gupta A, Suresh E, Bhattacharya S (2014) Design and fabrica­tion of 3-dimensional helical structures in polydimethylsiloxane for ow control applications. Microsyst Technol 20:101–111.
92. Subramanian Y, Gajendiran J, Veena R, Azad AK, Sabarish VCB, Muhammed Ali SA, Kumar A, Gubendiran RK (2023) Structural, Photoabsorption and Photocatalytic Characteristics of BiFeO3-WO3 Nanocomposites: An Attempt to Validate the Experimental Data Through SVM-Based Articial Intelligence (AI). J Electron Mater 1–11.
93. Vats P, Gajrani KK, Kumar A (2023) Laser-Based Additive Manufacturing. In: Laser-based Technologies for Sustainable Manufacturing. CRC Press, pp67–83.
94. Gupta, A., Choudhari, A., Kadaka, T., Rayar, P. (2019). Design and Analysis of Vertical Vacuum Fryer. In: Vasudevan, H., Kottur, V., Raina, A. (eds) Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 981- 13- 2490- 1_13.
95. Choudhari, A., Rayar, P., Shimpi, S., Pawar, N., Ambetkar, S. (2023). Design and Development of Vacuum Frying Machine for the Production of High-Quality Fried Products. In: Vasudevan, H., Kottur, V.K.N., Raina, A.A. (eds) Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 981- 19- 7971- 2_50.
96. Talkar, S., Choudhari, A., Rayar, P. (2020). Building Envelope Optimization and Cost­Effective Approach in HVAC to Support Smart Manufacturing. In: Vasudevan, H., Kottur, V., Raina, A. (eds) Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.
org/10.1007/978- 981- 15- 4485- 9_31.
97. A.Choudhari, A.Rane, S.Talkar, P. Rayar, and D.Shukla, ‘Designing and Prototyping for Conservation and Effective Utilization of Waste Heat from Air Conditioner’, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 1104, no. 1, p.012007, Mar. 2021, https://doi.
org/10.1088/1757- 899X/1104/1/012007.
98. Choudhari, A., Talkar, S., Rayar, P., Rane, A. (2020). Design and Manufacturing of Compact and Portable Smart CNC Machine. In: Vasudevan, H., Kottur, V., Raina, A. (eds) Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 981- 15- 4485- 9_21.
A. Kumar et al.
Chapter 2
Characterization ofHydrogel Properties intheAdvancement ofBio-Tribology
NusratChowdhury , SakibFaisal , AbhishekKumar , AmitChoudhari , AshishKumarGupta , AvinashKumar , andAshwaniKumar
Abstract Nature-driven artifacts have the most precise form of tribological proper-
ties. Because of hydration lubrication, biological tissues like articular cartilage have the lowest friction and wear. However, these natural tissues are hard to repair in case of injury, accident, or fracture. Recent advances in bio-tribology include replace­ment material development like hydrogel through surface property analysis and using hydrogel as an ECM microenvironment for cell proliferation. Hydrogels are used as potential biological tissue development because of the biphasic low friction nature of the material as it contains almost 90% water content like biological tissue. Hydration lubrication enables improved surface characterization and improves tri­bological properties. The chapter will primarily concentrate on characterizing the surface and structure of hydrogels and exploring the potential they offer as substi­tutes for biological tissue.
Keywords Articular cartilage · Cell proliferation (maybe) · Hydrogel types · Elastic modulus · Structural · Mechanical characteristics · Tribological properties · Bio-tribology · Structural properties · Tissue engineering
N. Chowdhury (*) University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA e-mail: nusratc2@illinois.edu
S. Faisal South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, USA
A. Kumar J.Mike Walker ’66 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Merced, CA, USA e-mail: akumar71@tamu.edu
A. Choudhari Mechanical Engineering Department, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH, USA e-mail: a.choudhari@vikes.csuohio.edu
A. Kumar etal. (eds.), Applications of Biotribology in Biomedical Systems,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58327-8_2
27© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024
28
N. Chowdhury etal.

2.1 Introduction

Tribological properties, encompassing the science of friction, wear, and lubrication, play a pivotal role in the efcient functioning of various materials and systems. Nature’s ingenious designs have provided remarkable examples of precise tribo­logical properties, as evidenced by biological tissues like articular cartilage, which exhibit minimal friction and wear due to the phenomenon of hydration lubrication. However, the innate limitations of these natural tissues, such as the challenge of repair after injury or damage, have driven the exploration of innovative solutions in the realm of bio-tribology [1]. Recent advancements in bio-tribology have spurred the development of potential replacement materials, particularly hydrogels, by leveraging in-depth surface property analysis. Hydrogels, characterized by their biphasic nature and high water content akin to biological tissues, have emerged as promising candidates for mimicking natural tissue behavior. Their unique proper­ties, including low friction characteristics and potential for creating a favorable extracellular matrix (ECM) microenvironment, have sparked interest in their appli­cation for biological tissue regeneration [2].
This chapter aims to delve into the intricacies of tribological properties exhibited by articular cartilage, the specialized tissue found in synovial joints responsible for smooth and resilient joint motion. We will explore the development of hydrogels as potential substitutes for biological tissues, focusing on their mechanical and struc­tural attributes. By examining the interplay between tribological properties, mechanical characteristics, and structural features, we seek to unravel the relation­ship underpinning these materials’ functionality. In the subsequent sections, we will embark on a journey through the fundamentals of articular cartilage‘s tribological prowess, the evolution of hydrogels as replacement materials, and the mechanical and structural attributes that dene their behavior. By investigating how tribological properties are intricately linked to these material characteristics, we aim to shed light on the promising role of hydrogels as substitutes for biological tissues, open­ing new avenues in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.
A. K. Gupta School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA e-mail: ashish.gupta10@okstate.edu
A. Kumar Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology Design & Manufacturing (IIITDM), Kancheepuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA e-mail: avikr@iiitdm.ac.in
A. Kumar Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical Education Department Uttar Pradesh (under Government of Uttar Pradesh), Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Characterization ofHydrogel Properties intheAdvancement ofBio-Tribology
29
2.2 Tribological Properties ofArticular Cartilage
Articular cartilage, located in synovial joints, is a durable tissue that serves as a protective layer. The thickness of articular cartilage in humans typically ranges from 1 to 5mm. It covers the surface where bones articulate, providing resilience and smooth movement during joint motion. The extracellular matrix (ECM) of articular cartilage contains dispersed chondrocytes, forming a connective tissue that offers various functions like structural support, resilience, and lubrication. ECM mainly consists of collagen (15–22%), water (60–85%), and proteoglycans (protein chains glycosaminoglycan (GAG)) (4–7%). Figure2.1 shows the layers and cross­sectional view of various zones in cartilage. The articular cartilage has four clearly dened zones: the deep zone, calcied zone, middle zone, and supercial zone [1].
The supercial zone accounts for 10–20% of the total thickness, of articular cartilage, is in direct contact with the joint space, and contains collagen bers and high cell density oriented parallelly to the articular surface, enabling it to withstand shear forces effectively and promote smooth sliding without friction [13]. The ori- entation of collagen bers in the middle/transitional zone of articular cartilage is distinct from that in the supercial zone, which is in the oblique or perpendicular to the articular surface, attened and elongated shape chondrocytes [4]. The deep car­tilage zone contains almost 30% of the cartilage, collagen ber, and chondrocytes arranged in vertical columns or clusters aligned perpendicularly to the articular sur­face. Additionally, within the calcied zone of articular cartilage, chondrocytes and a calcied matrix are present, serving as an anchor between the cartilage and the subchondral bone and aiding in the transmission of mechanical loads during joint movement [510].
The organization of bers and chondrocytes is the determination of the mechani­cal and structural properties of the tissue. However, the load-carrying ability and frictional characteristics of articular cartilage depend on its surface structure and supercial layer properties. An acellular non-brous, highly viscous synovial uid,
Fig. 2.1 A depiction of the different zones in articular cartilage in a cross-sectional view [170]
30
Fig. 2.2 Two types of defects in articular cartilage. (a) Chondral defect, (b) Osteochondral defect [14]
N. Chowdhury etal.
acceptable granular electron-dense material zone exists atop the transitional zone [11, 12]. The surface layer’s regenerative mechanism is dened by the mechanical characteristics and movement of liquid-like synovial uid, GAGS, and lipid throughout the cartilage surface and solid matrix structure when deformed [13]. Articular cartilage does not have progenitor cells, adequate nutrients, or perichon­drium, as proteoglycan is the water-attracting component in articular cartilage. It limits the healing capability of this cartilage and is known as cartilage damage or osteoarthritis. Two primary kinds of imperfections may occur osteochondral defects (C), which extend into the subchondral bone, and chondral defects (B), affecting only the cartilage. Figure2.2a,b shows the cartilage defect and osteochondral defect caused by age, bone defect, and accident [2, 14, 15].
In articular cartilage tissue engineering shown in Fig.2.3, the traditional approach involves using primary chondrocytes or stem cells, scaffolds, growth factors, and biomechanical methods to create potential cartilage replacements. The development of biomimetic articial cartilage relies on improving engineered cartilage’s fric­tional properties. Tribological properties like friction, wear, and lubrication are very important because of maintain healthy and functional articular cartilage joints. These tribological properties contribute to a crucial part in the degeneration of joints, cartilage, and OA [16].
2 Characterization ofHydrogel Properties intheAdvancement ofBio-Tribology
Fig. 2.3 In tissue engineering of articular cartilage, the conventional method involves using pri­mary chondrocytes or stem cells, scaffolding materials, growth factors, and morphogens, to develop constructs for potential cartilage replacement. Experimental biomechanical methods are presently utilized in current functional approaches techniques. Achieving biomimetic articial car­tilage will depend on advancements in the frictional properties of engineered cartilage [171]
31
2.3 Lubrication Mechanism ofArticular Cartilage

2.3.1 Fluid Pressurization/Fluid-Film Lubrication

Research ndings have provided insights into how lubrication occurs in the articular cartilage. In the early understanding of diarthrodial joints, it was hypothesized that articular cartilage relied on the lubrication mechanism of a uid lm, aided by the viscous synovial uid. This uid full-lm lubrication prevented direct contact between the cartilage surfaces. However, subsequent studies revealed that synovial uid is rapidly depleted within a short time as it lters through the porous layers of cartilage [17].
According to the biphasic theory, when articular cartilage experiences compres­sion, the uid and solid components of the tissue, which are nearly incompressible, provide the initial support for the applied stress during conned compression, where rigid walls surround the specimen, the tissue cannot undergo an isochoric (volume­conserving) deformation. Therefore, the interstitial uid builds pressure to counter­act the applied load. The extruded water forms a pressurized uid layer on the