Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5603_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
23 Мб
Скачать
9 Medical Devices Tribology
245
Fig. 9.3 (A) Vascular stents as MISDs demonstrate deployability through the balloon and its tri­bological interaction with the blood vessel wall. (a) Deployment of the catheter at the target site, (b) Positioning of the stent along the constricted vessel, (c) Ination of balloon to restore the vessel volume, (d) Deation and retraction into the catheter, (e) hemodynamic and friction forces acting on the deployed stent; (f) magnied view of a single strut of the stent on a vessel. (B) Catheter inserted into the vessel. (a) Guidewire being pushed, (b) Motion through the vessel, (c) catheter advancing further through the action of different forces, (d) Tribological interaction between cath­eter and vessel. (Adapted from Wagner etal. [62])
computational or experimental models that accurately mimic in vivo behavior. Service performance and lifespan can be enhanced by optimizing device materials and structures and considering blood lubrication and anticoagulation. While current research has advanced understanding of needle-tissue interaction, many unresolved issues persist. A comprehensive analysis of inuencing factors is lacking, making it challenging to simulate peristalsis and bending in the digestive tract accurately.
Additionally, the impact of liquids like mucus components or physiological saline on interaction is often overlooked. Continued research is needed to explore the combined effects of multiple factors. Even though bio-tribology research for medical devices has made great strides, unresolved problems still need to be addressed. Because these devices have special application requirements, safety is
246
N. Jain et al.
still paramount. Although bio-tribological activity is seen at interfaces, tribological interactions and dynamical consequences are often entangled. The bio-system and functions of the human body dictate the invivo loading and operating state of a tribological pair. Systematic consideration is, therefore, particularly crucial. Since the human body and its natural tissues are living things, seeing how naturally occur­ring living tissue and devices interact dynamically might be challenging.
The computational method is suggested to support studies and models of the invivo behavior of medical devices. In the biomechanical environment, individual patient variations including surgeon-specic and patient-specic characteristics like height, gender, and bone quality—are very important, especially for joint replace­ment. Personalized tribological considerations are, therefore, crucial to the design of medical devices. Although the creation of novel materials and surface changes is a frequently investigated approach to improving tribological qualities, both contact­ing surfaces impact tribological behavior. Therefore, future methods to enhance tri­bological performance should concentrate on accurately modifying the appropriateness of contacting surfaces.
Acknowledgement The author would like to acknowledge Fig.9.3 in this chapter, which has been taken with permission from having license number 5723580601093 from the press.

References

1. Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Jin, Z.A Review of the Bio-Tribology of Medical Devices. Friction 2022, 10 (1), 4–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544- 021- 0512- 6.
2. Meng, Y.; Xu, J.; Jin, Z.; Prakash, B.; Hu, Y. A Review of Recent Advances in Tribology. Friction 2020, 8 (2), 221–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544- 020- 0367- 2.
3. Paxton, E. W.; Ake, C. F.; Inacio, M. C. S.; Khatod, M.; Marinac-Dabic, D.; Sedrakyan, A.Evaluation of Total Hip Arthroplasty Devices Using a Total Joint Replacement Registry. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2012, 21 (S2), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.3228.
4. Nam, D.; Lawrie, C.M.; Salih, R.; Nahhas, C.R.; Barrack, R. L.; Nunley, R.M. Cemented Versus Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty of the Same Modern Design. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2019, 101 (13), 1185–1192. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.01162.
5. Takakubo, Y.; Berce, A.; Trebše, R.; Tamaki, Y.; Milošev, I.; Al-Samadi, A.; Tiainen, V.-M.; Orton; Konttinen, Y.T. Wear and Corrosion in the Loosening of Total Joint Replacements (TJRs). In Bio-Tribocorrosion in Biomaterials and Medical Implants; Elsevier, 2013; pp74–110. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857098603.1.74.
6. Li, J.; Qin, L.; Yang, K.; Ma, Z.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, L.; Zhao, D.Materials Evolution of Bone Plates for Internal Fixation of Bone Fractures: A Review. J Mater Sci Technol 2020, 36, 190–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2019.07.024.
7. Al-Tamimi, A.A.; Hernandez, M. A.; Omar, A.; Morales-Aldana, D.F.; Peach, C.; Bartolo, P.Mechanical, Biological and Tribological Behaviour of Fixation Plates 3D Printed by Electron Beam and Selective Laser Melting. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2020, 109 (3–4), 673–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170- 020- 05676- 1.
8. Lanza, A.; Ruggiero, A.; Sbordone, L.Tribology and Dentistry: A Commentary. Lubricants 2019, 7 (6), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants7060052.
9 Medical Devices Tribology
9. Wang, Y.; Li, G.; Yang, L.; Luo, R.; Guo, G. Development of Innovative Biomaterials and Devices for the Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases. Advanced Materials 2022, 34 (46).
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202201971.
10. Fraser, A.G.; Daubert, J.-C.; Van de Werf, F.; Estes, N.A. M.; Smith, S.C.; Krucoff, M.W.; Vardas, P.E.; Komajda, M.; Anker, S.; Auricchio, A.; Bailey, S.; Bonhoeffer, P.; Borggrefe, M.; Brodin, L.-A.; Bruining, N.; Buser, P.; Butchart, E.; Calle Gordo, J.; Cleland, J.; Danchin, N.; Daubert, J.; Degertekin, M.; Demade, I.; Denjoy, N.; Derumeaux, G.; Di Mario, C.; Dickstein, K.; Dudek, D.; Estes, N.; Farb, A.; Flotats, A.; Fraser, A.; Gueret, P.; Israel, C.; James, S.; Kautzner, J.; Komajda, M.; Krucoff, M.; Lombardi, M.; Marwick, T.; Mioulet, M.; O’Kelly, S.; Perrone-Filardi, P.; Rosano, G.; Rosenhek, R.; Sabate, M.; Smith, S.; Swahn, E.; Tavazzi, L.; Van de Werf, F.; van der Velde, E.; van Herwerden, L.; Vardas, P.; Voigt, J.-U.; Weaver, D.; Wilmshurst, P.Clinical Evaluation of Cardiovascular Devices: Principles, Problems, and Proposals for European Regulatory Reform: Report of a Policy Conference of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2011, 32 (13), 1673–1686. https://doi.org/10.1093/
eurheartj/ehr171.
11. Sobolewski, P.; El Fray, M. Cardiac Catheterization: Consequences for the Endothelium and Potential for Nanomedicine. WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology 2015, 7 (3), 458–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.1316.
12. Takahashi, T.; Murayama, R.; Abe-Doi, M.; Miyahara-Kaneko, M.; Kanno, C.; Nakamura, M.; Mizuno, M.; Komiyama, C.; Sanada, H.Preventing Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Failure by Reducing Mechanical Irritation. Sci Rep 2020, 10 (1), 1550. https://doi.org/10.1038/
s41598- 019- 56873- 2.
13. Chen, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, X.; Jin, Z.-M.Biomechanics and Tribology of Articial Knee Joint; 2019; pp191–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 981- 13- 6924- 7_7.
14. Shahemi, N.; Liza, S.; Abbas, A. A.; Merican, A. Long-Term Wear Failure Analysis of Uhmwpe Acetabular Cup in Total Hip Replacement. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2018, 87, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.07.017.
15. Popoola, O.O.; Orozco Villasenor, D.A.; Fryman, J.C.; Mimnaugh, K.; Rufner, A.High Cycle in Vitro Hip Wear of and in Vivo Biological Response to Vitamin E Blended Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene. Biotribology 2018, 16, 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotri.2018.09.001.
16. Howard, D.P.; Wall, P. D. H.; Fernandez, M. A.; Parsons, H.; Howard, P. W. Ceramic-on­Ceramic Bearing Fractures in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2017, 99-B (8), 1012–1019.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301- 620X.99B8.BJJ- 2017- 0019.R1.
17. Song, J.; Liao, Z.; Shi, H.; Xiang, D.; Liu, Y.; Liu, W.; Peng, Z.Fretting Wear Study of PEEK­Based Composites for Bio-Implant Application. Tribol Lett 2017, 65 (4), 150. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s11249- 017- 0931- 8.
18. Costales, T. G.; Chapman, D. M.; Dalury, D. F. The Natural History of Radiolucencies Following Uncemented Total Knee Arthroplasty at 9 Years. J Arthroplasty 2020, 35 (1), 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.08.032.
19. Bartolomeu, F.; Buciumeanu, M.; Pinto, E.; Alves, N.; Silva, F. S.; Carvalho, O.; Miranda, G.Wear Behavior of Ti6Al4V Biomedical Alloys Processed by Selective Laser Melting, Hot Pressing and Conventional Casting. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China 2017, 27 (4), 829–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003- 6326(17)60060- 8.
20. Zhang, Y.; Addison, O.; Yu, F.; Troconis, B. C. R.; Scully, J. R.; Davenport, A.J. Time­Dependent Enhanced Corrosion of Ti6Al4V in the Presence of H2O2 and Albumin. Sci Rep 2018, 8 (1), 3185. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598- 018- 21332- x.
21. Wang, C.; Zhang, G.; Li, Z.; Zeng, X.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, S.; Hu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, T.Tribological Behavior of Ti-6Al-4V against Cortical Bone in Different Biolubricants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2019, 90, 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.10.031.
22. Attabi, S.; Mokhtari, M.; Taibi, Y.; Abdel-Rahman, I.; Hafez, B.; Elmsellem, H.Electrochemical and Tribological Behavior of Surface-Treated Titanium Alloy Ti–6Al–4V. J Bio Tribocorros 2019, 5 (1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40735- 018- 0193- 5.
247
248
23. Wang, G.; Wang, S.; Yang, X.; Yu, X.; Wen, D.; Chang, Z.; Zhang, M. Fretting Wear and Mechanical Properties of Surface-Nanostructural Titanium Alloy Bone Plate. Surf Coat Technol 2021, 405, 126512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126512.
24. Carvalho, A.; Pinto, P.; Madeira, S.; Silva, F. S.; Carvalho, O.; Gomes, J. R. Tribological Characterization of Dental Restorative Materials. Biotribology 2020, 23, 100140. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.biotri.2020.100140.
25. Mörmann, W.H.; Stawarczyk, B.; Ender, A.; Sener, B.; Attin, T.; Mehl, A.Wear Characteristics of Current Aesthetic Dental Restorative CAD/CAM Materials: Two-Body Wear, Gloss Retention, Roughness and Martens Hardness. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2013, 20, 113–125.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.01.003.
26. Shenoy, A.; Shenoy, N.Dental Ceramics: An Update. Journal of Conservative Dentistry 2010, 13 (4), 195. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972- 0707.73379.
27. Pratap, B.; Gupta, R.K.; Shekhawat, D. S.; Yadav, A.; Chaabra, D.; Nag, M. Physical and Mechanical Characterization of Nanoalumina Filled Resin Based Dental Composites. Mater Today Proc 2020, 28, 2171–2173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.162.
28. Nedeljkovic, I.; Teughels, W.; De Munck, J.; Van Meerbeek, B.; Van Landuyt, K. L. Is Secondary Caries with Composites a Material-Based Problem? Dental Materials 2015, 31 (11), e247–e277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.001.
29. Yadav, S.; Gangwar, S. A Critical Evaluation of Tribological Interaction for Restorative Materials in Dentistry. International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials 2019, 68 (17), 1005–1019. https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2018.1525544.
30. Kumar, S. R.; Patnaik, A.; Bhat, I.K. The in Vitro Wear Behavior of Nanozirconia-Filled Dental Composite in Food Slurry Condition. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology 2017, 231 (1), 23–40. https://doi.
org/10.1177/1350650116641329.
31. Chadda, H.; Satapathy, B.K.; Patnaik, A.; Ray, A.R. Mechanistic Interpretations of Fracture Toughness and Correlations to Wear Behavior of Hydroxyapatite and Silica/Hydroxyapatite Filled Bis-GMA/TEGDMA Micro/Hybrid Dental Restorative Composites. Compos B Eng 2017, 130, 132–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.069.
32. Xu, Z.; Yu, P.; Arola, D.D.; Min, J.; Gao, S.A Comparative Study on the Wear Behavior of a Polymer Inltrated Ceramic Network (PICN) Material and Tooth Enamel. Dental Materials 2017, 33 (12), 1351–1361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.08.190.
33. Yu, P.; Xu, Z.; Arola, D.D.; Min, J.; Zhao, P.; Gao, S.Effect of Acidic Agents on the Wear Behavior of a Polymer Inltrated Ceramic Network (PICN) Material. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2017, 74, 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.001.
34. Armentia, M.; Abasolo, M.; Coria, I.; Albizuri, J.Fatigue Design of Dental Implant Assemblies: A Nominal Stress Approach. Metals (Basel) 2020, 10 (6), 744. https://doi.org/10.3390/
met10060744.
35. Corne, P.; De March, P.; Cleymand, F.; Geringer, J.Fretting-Corrosion Behavior on Dental Implant Connection in Human Saliva. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2019, 94, 86–92. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.02.025.
36. Lioubavina-Hack, N.; Lang, N. P.; Karring, T. Signicance of Primary Stability for Osseointegration of Dental Implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006, 17 (3), 244–250. https://
doi.org/10.1111/j.1600- 0501.2005.01201.x.
37. Liu, X.; Niu, Y.; Xie, W.; Wei, D.; Du, Q.Comparative Investigations of in Vitro and in Vivo Bioactivity of Titanium vs. Ti–24Nb–4Zr–8Sn Alloy before and after Sandblasting and Acid Etching. RSC Adv 2020, 10 (40), 23582–23591. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA00280A.
38. Medvedev, A. E.; Molotnikov, A.; Lapovok, R.; Zeller, R.; Berner, S.; Habersetzer, P.; Dalla Torre, F.Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Ti–15Zr Alloy Used as Dental Implant Material. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016, 62, 384–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jmbbm.2016.05.008.
39. Bose, S.; Banerjee, D.; Shivaram, A.; Tarafder, S.; Bandyopadhyay, A.Calcium Phosphate Coated 3D Printed Porous Titanium with Nanoscale Surface Modication for Orthopedic
N. Jain et al.
9 Medical Devices Tribology
and Dental Applications. Mater Des 2018, 151, 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
matdes.2018.04.049.
40. Edelmann, A.R.; Patel, D.; Allen, R.K.; Gibson, C.J.; Best, A.M.; Bencharit, S.Retrospective Analysis of Porous Tantalum Trabecular Metal–Enhanced Titanium Dental Implants. J Prosthet Dent 2019, 121 (3), 404–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.022.
41. Prasad, A., Bhasney, S. M., Prasannavenkadesan, V., Sankar, M. R., & Katiyar, V. (2023). Polylactic acid reinforced with nano-hydroxyapatite bioabsorbable cortical screws for bone fracture treatment. Journal of Polymer Research, 30(5), 177.
42. Prasad, A., Bhasney, S. M., Prasannavenkadesan, V., Sankar, M. R., & Katiyar, V. (2023). Nano-hydroxyapatite reinforced polylactic acid bioabsorbable cancellous screws for bone fracture xations. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 140(43), e54577.
43. Prasad, A. (2021). Bioabsorbable polymeric materials for biolms and other biomedical appli­cations: Recent and future trends. Materials Today: Proceedings, 44, 2447–2453.
44. Prasad, A. (2021). State of art review on bioabsorbable polymeric scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials Today: Proceedings, 44, 1391–1400.
45. Prasad, A., Bhasney, S., Katiyar, V., & Sankar, M.R. (2017). Biowastes processed hydroxy­apatite lled poly (lactic acid) bio-composite for open reduction internal xation of small bones. Materials Today: Proceedings, 4(9), 10153–10157.
46. Chakraborty, G., Padmashree, R., & Prasad, A. (2023). Recent advancement of surface modi­cation techniques of 2-D nanomaterials. Materials Science and Engineering: B, 297, 116817.
47. Prasad, A., Chakraborty, G., & Kumar, A. (2022). Bio-based environmentally benign poly­meric resorbable materials for orthopedic xation applications. In Advanced Materials for Biomedical Applications (pp.251–266). CRC Press.
48. Prasad, A. (2022). Biomaterial-based nanobers scaffolds in tissue engineering application. In Functional Biomaterials: Drug Delivery and Biomedical Applications (pp. 245–264). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
49. Sarkar, K., Dutta, K., Chatterjee, A., Sarkar, J., Das, D., Prasad, A., … De, S. (2023). Nanotherapeutic potential of antibacterial folic acid-functionalized nanoceria for wound­healing applications. Nanomedicine, 18(2), 109–123.
50. Katiyar Vimal, Prasad Arbind, Sankar M.R., Bhasney S.M. (2022). Process for the preparation of Polymer composite based Cancellous screw and Pins (Indian Patent No. 401811).
51. Katiyar Vimal, Prasad Arbind, Sankar M.R., (2022). Process for the preparation of resorbable polymeric composite bone stable (Indian Patent No. 393675).
52. Katiyar Vimal, Prasad Arbind, Sankar M.R., (2023). Process for the preparation of Polymer composite based Cancellous screw and Pins (Indian Patent No. 449153).
53. Katiyar Vimal, Prasad Arbind, Sankar M.R., (2024). Resorbable composite bone plate (Indian Patent No. 500905).
54. Prasad, A., Datta, S., Kumar, A., & Gupta, M. (2023). Introduction to Next-Generation Materials for Biomedical Applications. Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Techniques for Biomedical Applications, 1–24.
55. Chakraborty, G., Pandey, V., Prasad, A., & Kumar, A. (2023). Introduction to Sustainable Manufacturing for Industries 4.0. In Sustainable Smart Manufacturing Processes in Industry
4.0 (pp.1–17). CRC Press.
56. Paul, A. K., Borkotoky, S.S., & Prasad, A. (2023). Nanohydroxyapatite-Based Composite Materials and Processing. Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Techniques for Biomedical Applications, 157–183.
57. Prasad, A., Chakraborty, G., & Kumar, A. (2022). Bio-based environmentally benign poly­meric resorbable materials for orthopedic xation applications (pp.251–266). Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.
58. Zhang, H.; Deng, X.; Cianciulli, T.F.; Zhang, Z.; Chappard, D.; Lax, J.A.; Saccheri, M.C.; Redruello, H. J.; Jordana, J. L.; Prezioso, H. A.; King, M.; Guidoin, R. Pivoting System Fracture in a Bileaet Mechanical Valve: A Case Report. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009, 90B (2), 952–961. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31324.
249
250
59. Sundareswaran, K.S.; Reichenbach, S.H.; Masterson, K.B.; Butler, K.C.; Farrar, D.J. Low Bearing Wear in Explanted HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Devices After Chronic Clinical Support. ASAIO Journal 2013, 59 (1), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0b013e3182768cfb.
60. Moazami, N.; Fukamachi, K.; Kobayashi, M.; Smedira, N.G.; Hoercher, K.J.; Massiello, A.; Lee, S.; Horvath, D.J.; Starling, R.C. Axial and Centrifugal Continuous-Flow Rotary Pumps: A Translation from Pump Mechanics to Clinical Practice. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation 2013, 32 (1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2012.10.001.
61. da Silva, B.U.; da Fonseca, J.W. G.; Leal, E.B.; Cardoso, J.R.; Biscegli, J.F.; de Andrade, A. J. P. Apical Aortic Blood Pump Preclinical Assessment for Long-term Use: Durability Test and Stator Topology to Reduce Wear in the Bearing System. Artif Organs 2020, 44 (8), 779–784. https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.13587.
62. Wagner, R.M. F.; Maiti, R.; Carré, M.J.; Perrault, C.M.; Evans, P.C.; Lewis, R.Bio-Tribology of Vascular Devices: A Review of Tissue/Device Friction Research. Biotribology 2021, 25,
100169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotri.2021.100169.
63. Cornelissen, A.; Vogt, F.J. The Effects of Stenting on Coronary Endothelium from a Molecular Biological View: Time for Improvement? J Cell Mol Med 2019, 23 (1), 39–46. https://doi.
org/10.1111/jcmm.13936.
64. Chen, T.; Lancaster, M.; Lin, D.S. Y.; Doyle, M.G.; Forbes, T.L.; Amon, C.H. Measurement of Frictional Properties of Aortic Stent Grafts and Their Delivery Systems. J Med Device 2019, 13 (2). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043292.
65. Jelínek, F.; Arkenbout, E.A.; Henselmans, P.W. J.; Pessers, R.; Breedveld, P.Classication of Joints Used in Steerable Instruments for Minimally Invasive Surgery—A Review of the State of the Art. J Med Device 2015, 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028649.
66. Toniato, A.; Bernante, P.; Rosse, G. P.; Piotto, A.; Pelizzo, M.R. Laparoscopic versus Open Adrenalectomy: Outcome in 35 Consecutive Patients. Int J Surg Investig 2000, 1 (6), 503–507.
67. Wanninayake, I. B.; Althoefer, K.; Seneviratne, L. D. Novel Air-Float Tactile Array for Stiffness Characterization in Soft Tissue Palpation. Procedia Eng 2012, 41, 281–288. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.174.
68. Jin, Z.M.; Zheng, J.; Li, W.; Zhou, Z.R. Tribology of Medical Devices. Biosurf Biotribol 2016, 2 (4), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bsbt.2016.12.001.
69. Kim, J.-S.; Sung, I.-H.; Kim, Y.-T.; Kim, D.-E.; Jang, Y.-H.Analytical Model Development for the Prediction of the Frictional Resistance of a Capsule Endoscope inside an Intestine. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2007, 221 (8), 837–845. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544119JEIM173.
70. Fletcher, D.R.; Hobbs, M.S. T.; Tan, P.; Valinsky, L.J.; Hockey, R.L.; Pikora, T.J.; Knuiman, M.W.; Sheiner, H.J.; Edis, A.Complications of Cholecystectomy: Risks of the Laparoscopic Approach and Protective Effects of Operative Cholangiography. Ann Surg 1999, 229 (4), 449–457. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658- 199904000- 00001.
71. Pan, C.; Han, Y.; Lu, J.Structural Design of Vascular Stents: A Review. Micromachines (Basel) 2021, 12 (7), 770. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12070770.
72. Slonim, S.M.; Dake, M.D.; Razavi, M.K.; Kee, S.T.; Samuels, S.L.; Rhee, J.S.; Semba, C.P. Management of Misplaced or Migrated Endovascular Stents. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 1999, 10 (7), 851–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1051- 0443(9
9)70127- 2.
N. Jain et al.
Chapter 10
Composites forDrug-Eluting Devices: Emerging Biomedical Applications
AshishKumarGupta , AmitChoudhari , AbhishekKumar , AvinashKumar , AnamikaGupta , SakibFaisal , andAshwaniKumar
Abstract The utilization of drug-eluting devices has surged in the biomedical sec-
tor owing to their precise delivery of therapeutic agents to targeted areas within the body. Composites, a combination of two or more components with distinct proper­ties, offer an innovative avenue for developing highly effective drug-eluting devices. This review aims to explore the potential of composites in drug delivery, focusing on selection criteria, integration of therapeutic agents, release mechanisms, toxicity evaluation, and advanced fabrication techniques. Composite materials, often pairing a biocompatible matrix with therapeutic agents, provide structural support and con­trolled release properties, while the therapeutic agents deliver targeted treatment. Selecting the right composite material is critical, considering factors like biocom­patibility, degradability, mechanical properties, and drug compatibility. This will also emphasize advanced fabrication techniques, particularly additive manufactur­ing, which is pivotal in biomedical applications. The exploration of composite materials for drug delivery encompasses a comprehensive understanding of their characteristics, selection criteria, and potential across various biomedical domains. Surface engineering and characterization methods, including structural, chemical, and mechanical analysis, will be discussed in detail. Moreover, the study will explore advanced fabrication techniques like additive manufacturing, which is essential for drug delivery, tissue engineering, and regenerative medicine applica­tions. Challenges in composite-based drug delivery, such as biocompatibility, con­trolled release, and scalability, will be outlined alongside emerging trends. Ultimately, the paper aims to provide readers with a foundational understanding of composite material usage in drug delivery mechanisms and its potential in transfor-
A. K. Gupta (*) School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA e-mail: ashish.gupta10@okstate.edu
A. Choudhari Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH, USA e-mail: a.choudhari@vikes.csuohio.edu
A. Kumar et al. (eds.), Applications of Biotribology in Biomedical Systems,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58327-8_10
251© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024
252
A. K. Gupta et al.
mative biomedical applications, steering them toward a comprehensive comprehen­sion of this dynamic realm.
Keywords Nanocomposite · Drug-eluting devices · Drug delivery · Controlled release · Biocompatibility · Biomedical applications

10.1 Introduction

In the eld of biomedicine, drug-eluting devices are now widely used to effectively deliver medication to particular areas of the body with great accuracy [1, 2]. This innovative approach addresses the challenge of targeted drug delivery, allowing for the localized release of pharmaceuticals, bioactive molecules, and other therapeutic agents [3, 4]. The concept revolves around integrating these therapeutic agents into materials that form the basis of medical devices, creating a platform for controlled and targeted treatment. Drug-eluting devices offer a paradigm shift from conven­tional systemic drug administration, providing a more focused and efcient means of delivering therapeutic interventions [5, 6]. The importance of drug-eluting devices in the biomedical eld is underscored by their potential to enhance treat­ment outcomes while minimizing the adverse effects of systemic drug delivery. By enabling site-specic drug release, these devices improve the therapeutic efcacy of pharmaceuticals and mitigate systemic side effects, leading to a more favorable risk-benet prole for patients [7, 8]. This precision in drug delivery is crucial in treating various medical conditions, such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and inammatory disorders, where localized intervention is often preferred over sys­temic approaches [5, 9]. Moreover, drug-eluting devices offer a versatile platform
A. Kumar J.Mike Walker ’66 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Merced, Merced, CA, USA e-mail: akumar71@tamu.edu
A. Kumar Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology Design & Manufacturing (IIITDM), Kancheepuram, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA e-mail: avikr@iiitdm.ac.in
A. Gupta Department of General Surgery, Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi Memorial Medical College, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
S. Faisal South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, USA
A. Kumar Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical Education Department Uttar Pradesh (under Government of Uttar Pradesh), Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
10 Composites forDrug-Eluting Devices: Emerging Biomedical Applications
253
for delivering diverse therapeutic agents, including pharmaceutical drugs, growth factors, antibodies, and genetic materials. This exibility allows for tailored treat­ment strategies, catering to the specic needs of various medical conditions. Integrating these therapeutic agents into the devices’ matrices is critical, as it deter­mines the controlled release kinetics and overall effectiveness of the drug-eluting system [10, 11]. The signicance of drug-eluting devices in biomedical applications lies in their ability to address critical challenges associated with conventional drug delivery methods, offering a precise and targeted approach to therapeutic interven­tions [12]. This heightened attention stems from the unique advantages that drug­eluting devices bring to the eld of medicine, particularly in precision, efcacy, and reduced systemic side effects [13].
One of the primary reasons drug-eluting devices have garnered attention is their capacity to precisely deliver therapeutic agents to specic anatomical sites within the body [14]. This precision is of paramount importance in conditions where the pathological process is conned to a specic tissue or organ, such as in the case of cardiovascular stents delivering antiproliferative agents to prevent restenosis [15]. These devices optimize drug concentrations at the target by delivering therapeutic agents directly to the site of action, maximizing treatment effectiveness. This tar­geted delivery not only improves the overall therapeutic outcomes but also allows for the use of lower drug doses, mitigating the risk of systemic toxicity and adverse effects commonly associated with higher systemic drug concentrations [16]. Furthermore, the capacity of drug-eluting devices to minimize systemic side effects contributes to an improved safety prole in comparison to traditional systemic drug administration. This is particularly signicant in the context of chronic diseases or conditions requiring prolonged treatment, where systemic exposure to drugs may lead to complications. Drug-eluting devices thus offer a more patient-centric approach by reducing the likelihood of adverse reactions and enhancing overall treatment adherence [17, 18]. The precise and targeted delivery facilitated by drug­eluting devices has profound implications across various medical domains, includ­ing cardiology, oncology, neurology, and orthopedics. As a result, the biomedical community is increasingly recognizing the potential of these devices to revolution­ize therapeutic strategies, providing more effective and patient-friendly solutions. Ongoing research and technological advancements in this eld continue to rene drug-eluting devices, pushing the boundaries of what can be achieved in terms of precision, selectivity, and therapeutic impact [16, 19].
The main focus of this review revolves around exploring the promising applica­tion of composites as materials for drug-eluting devices in biomedical contexts [1]. Composites, dened as materials composed of two or more distinct components with different properties, have garnered signicant attention for their potential to enhance the performance and functionality of drug-eluting devices. Composites offer a versatile platform for developing drug-eluting devices, combining the advan­tageous properties of different materials to create a synergistic effect [20, 21]. Integrating a biocompatible matrix material with therapeutic agents forms the basis of these composites [22]. The matrix material provides structural integrity, con­trolled release properties, and biocompatibility, while the therapeutic agents
254
contribute to targeted treatment and improved patient outcomes [23]. This combina­tion allows for a tailored approach to drug delivery, optimizing the characteristics of both components to achieve enhanced functionality. Using composites in drug­eluting devices opens avenues for addressing key challenges associated with tradi­tional drug delivery systems. The inherent exibility of composites in terms of material selection and design enables researchers to tailor devices for specic appli­cations and medical conditions. Moreover, composites can be engineered to provide sustained or controlled release of therapeutic agents, ensuring optimal drug concen­trations at the target site over an extended period [1, 8].
The potential of composites to enhance the performance of drug-eluting devices is exemplied by their ability to provide a controlled and tunable release of thera­peutic agents [24]. This is essential in achieving precision in drug delivery, a critical aspect for effective treatment outcomes. Composites also offer the advantage of modulating the release kinetics, allowing for customized therapeutic strategies based on the unique requirements of different medical conditions. Furthermore, using composites in drug-eluting devices aligns with the growing trend of advanced fabrication techniques, such as additive manufacturing [25]. This allows for creat­ing intricate and customized device structures, facilitating the incorporation of diverse materials into a single composite system. Combining composites with cutting- edge fabrication techniques enhances the adaptability of drug-eluting devices, catering to the evolving needs of biomedical applications [26].
Overall, this review paper sets the stage for the subsequent exploration of diverse composites in drug delivery applications. It highlights the unique advantages of composites in enhancing the performance and functionality of drug-eluting devices, laying the groundwork for a comprehensive understanding of their potential across various biomedical domains. It will also delve into specic aspects, including com­posite selection criteria, integration of therapeutic agents, release mechanisms, tox­icity evaluation, biocompatibility assessment, surface engineering, and advanced fabrication techniques, providing a holistic view of the dynamic realm of composite­based drug delivery devices.
A. K. Gupta et al.
10.2 Composite Materials forDrug Delivery
10.2.1 Characteristics ofComposites
In drug delivery, composites refer to materials composed of two or more distinct components with different properties that are combined to create a synergistic and functional material. The fundamental characteristic of composites lies in their abil­ity to integrate the unique advantages of each constituent component, leading to a material with enhanced properties not achievable by any single component alone. These composite materials are designed to address specic challenges in drug deliv­ery, offering tailored solutions to optimize therapeutic outcomes.