Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_927_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
31 Мб
Скачать
P H
S
Mark L. Manwaring
idradenitis suppurativa (HS), which was rst described by Alfred Velpeau in the early 1800s, is a chronic inammatory condition
H
of apocrine sweat glands aecting between 2% and 4% of young adults. HS results in signicant morbidity in many patients. Although it most frequently involves the axillae and groin, perianal HS confronts the surgeon with a sometimes frustrating refractory inammation that can mimic other types of perianal sepsis. Given the signicant variability in presentation, the Hurley staging system provides a measure of disease severity (Table 8-1).

ETIOLOGY

Most investigators agree that HS is caused by follicular occlusion and secondary infection of apocrine sweat glands. However, genetic, immunologic, and hormonal factors may inuence the development of the disease. Pathologic analysis of resected specimens suggests that compromised support of the follicular unit results from the specic abnormalities seen immunohistochemically. Elevated levels of inter­leukin (IL)-1β, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, IL-10, and matrix metalloproteinase-2 have been found in tissues of patients with HS. Upon recognition that TNF inhibitors aect the disease, studies have been performed in an attempt to identify the relevant pathways. Although involvement is limited to areas of the body with apocrine glands, these glands are present with the same density and size in patients with HS as in control subjects. Deodorants and shaving do not seem to aect disease development. Obesity seems to be asso­ciated with HS, but it is unclear whether this association is due to related hormonal changes or associated dermal trauma.
Patients with HS oen have a family history of the disease (in one study, 18 of 70 patients were reported to have a family history), sup­porting a genetic predisposition. However, no consistent genetic cause has been identied. Smoking is signicantly more common in patients with HS than in matched control subjects. HS occurs in patients with other chronic inammatory conditions, most notably Crohn disease, although causal relationships have not been established. Negative bacterial cultures from HS lesions are common, and the exact role of
TABLE 8-1: Hurley Staging of Hidradenitis
Suppurativa
Stage Features
I Isolated abscess(es) without scarring, sinus tracts
II Recurrent abscesses with tract formation and cicatri-
zation; single or multiple widely separated lesions
III Diuse or near-diuse involvement or multiple inter-
connected tracts and abscesses over an entire area
infection in persons with HS is controversial. Infection probably plays a secondary role and likely worsens the progressive scarring seen in later stages of the disease. Cultures of deeper tissues may not have the same results as those of more supercial lesions. 

CLINICAL PRESENTATION AND EVALUATION

HS initially appears as painful, round, subcutaneous nodules that may resolve or progress over days or weeks to abscesses. ese abscesses do not typically point to the surface as with staphylococcal infec­tions but rather become progressively inamed and swollen, caus­ing deeper dermal involvement. ese abscesses oen spontaneously rupture and may drain seropurulent malodorous debris. Symptoms may spontaneously improve in one area with no signicant treatment but oen recur in another area and frequently become progressive. Disease may aect only one site or multiple areas simultaneously. Areas of suppuration may coalesce and stulize to adjacent tissues, resulting in subcutaneous tracts or sinuses with signicant associ­ated induration. In later stages of the disease, chronic inammation results in multiple draining sinuses from underlying suppuration and leads to signicant scarring. Skin contractures in the axilla or groin may eventually develop. Over the long term, patients with HS have a 2% to 4% risk of developing squamous cell carcinoma in the scars.
Although it is rarely life threatening, HS is a debilitating, painful, recurrent condition that causes signicant alteration in quality of life. Many patients experience embarrassment and social isolation and strug­gle with job retention because of recurrent exacerbations of the disease.
Because perianal sepsis frequently has a cryptoglandular source and other perianal dermatological diseases exist, the diagnosis of perianal hidradenitis may not be obvious. e dierential diagnosis includes pilonidal disease, anal stula, or perianal Crohn disease. Careful exam­ination with appropriate lighting and anoscopy is required to establish the diagnosis and rule out other causes. At times, examination aer induction of anesthesia is necessary to trace stulous connections and conrm that the anal canal is not involved. A diagnosis of HS is sug­gested by the multiple supercial cutaneous scars. None of the sinuses or stulas extends to the dentate line, in contrast to cryptoglandular sepsis, which originates in the anal crypts. 

ANTIBIOTIC TREATMENT

Treatment of HS is based on presentation, distribution of disease, and stage (see Table 8-1). Medical treatment is standard for stage I disease and includes a wide range of agents. Long-course antibiotic therapy has shown some ecacy and typically includes tetracycline, erythromycin, lymecycline, or doxycycline. Topical clindamycin lotion has shown similar ecacy. ese regimens have a temporary, likely suppressive eect on the disease but are not generally curative.
41
Perianal Hidradenitis suPPurativa42
Stage IIIStage IIStage I
Stop smoking Antibiotics Minimize trauma
Biologics if indicated for concurrent disease
Consider targeted
local resection
Primary closure
Local flap closure
Secondary intention
FIGURE 8-1 Treatment choices.
Consider radical
resection
Flap closure
Skin graft
Secondary intention
Cultures can be helpful to tailor antibiotic therapy but are oen nega­tive, and deeper tissues may be infected by other organisms. 

NONANTIBIOTIC TREATMENT

Oral isotretinoin, which is used for acne, does not help patients with HS, but oral acitretin showed ecacy in a small study. is drug is tera­togenic, however, and thus its use accordingly is limited. Small studies support the use of dapsone, which has temporary ecacy in fewer than 40% of patients. Hormonal modulation with estrogen agents and naste­ride has had positive results, and some evidence indicates that hormonal modulation may be more eective than use of antibiotics. Some case reports suggest improvement with zinc supplementation, metformin, and other agents, but data are insucient to support their routine use.
Initial recognition that persons with Crohn disease who had HS experienced improvement in symptoms with TNF-α inhibitors has prompted an evaluation of these biologic agents in treating refractory HS. Although data are limited, iniximab and adalimumab have shown short-term response rates from 60% to 80%. ese agents should be considered in patients with concurrent inammatory bowel disease. 

SURGICAL TREATMENT

For acutely infected lesions with undrained pus, adequate drainage is required. Most drainage procedures, including marsupialization, or limited local excision, have a temporizing eect. Unlike drainage of simpler abscesses, isolated drainage in HS is rarely curative. Antibiot­ics are used liberally given the underlying chronic inammation. Most clinicians regard the morbidity of excision excessive for stage I disease, and medical regimens are used to suppress the process and prevent progression, although this approach has had limited success (Fig. 8-1).
Surgical excision is the best chance for cure for patients with stage II or III HS, because it is the only treatment that removes chronically scarred tissues. In general, the more radical the resection, the fewer the recurrences of disease. is nding underscores the predilection for recurrence in any residual hair-bearing skin. Resection should remove the entire grossly involved area with a negative margin of so, healthy underlying tissue, which frequently requires excision down to the fascia.
e main challenge aer excision is to select the best closure method. Primary closure is appropriate when wound edges can be approximated and contamination is minimal. Local advancement aps can decrease the size of the defect or assist in primary closure. ese techniques oer faster healing at the risk of postoperative infections and recurrence. Healing by secondary intention is best for grossly contaminated wounds, and with meticulous wound care, this approach oers the lowest recurrence rates at the expense of pro­longed healing. Immediate and delayed skin graing may shorten healing time and lessen the incidence of contractures, as well as oer a better cosmetic result.
FIGURE 8-2 Anal stenosis after excision of hidradenitis.
Care should be taken in circumferential excision of perianal hidradenitis because anal stenosis may result from postsurgical scar­ring (Fig. 8-2). Flap anoplasty can be used to avoid or treat this com­plication. As with all excisions, infectious complications and delayed healing are common. Although unroong of lesions, laser ablation, and photodynamic therapy have been reported, none of these tech­niques is currently recommended. 

SUMMARY

Perianal HS is frequently a frustrating disease for patients, and correct diagnosis demands that other causes of perianal sepsis be excluded. Although temporizing medical regimens may have limited success, surgery is oen required. Localized lesions may be treated with inci­sion and drainage, but recurrence should be expected, and patients with frequent recurrences should be treated with excision. Whether the wound is le to heal by secondary intention or closed with or without advancement aps, progressive recurrent infection oen carries much greater long-term morbidity for patients than surgery.

S u g g e S t e d R e a d i n g

Boer J, Nazary M. Long-term results of acitretin therapy for hidradenitis sup-
purativa. Is acne inversa also a misnomer? Br J Dermatol. 2011;164:170–175. Ellis LZ. Hidradenitis suppurativa: surgical and other management tech-
niques. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38:517–536. Kra JN, Searles GE. Hidradenitis suppurativa in 64 female patients: ret-
rospective study comparing oral antibiotics and antiandrogen therapy.
J Cutan Med Surg. 2007;11:125–131. Morgan WP, Hughes LE. e distribution, size and density of the apocrine
glands in hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Surg. 1979;66:853–856. Morgan WP, Leicester G. e role of depilation and deodorants in hidradeni-
tis suppurativa. Arch Dermatol. 1982;118:101–102. Nesmith RB, Merkel KL, Mast BA. Radical surgical resection combined with
lymphadenectomy-directed antimicrobial therapy yielding cure of severe
axillary hidradenitis. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;70:538–541. Randhawa HK, Hamilton J, Pope E. Finasteride for the treatment of
hidradenitis suppurativa in children and adolescents. JAMA Dermatol.
2013;149:732–735. Slade DE, Powell BW, Mortimer PS. Hidradenitis suppurativa: pathogenesis
and management. Br J Plast Surg. 2003;56:451–461. van Rappard DC, Limpens J, Mekkes JR. e o-label treatment of severe
hidradenitis suppurativa with TNF-alpha inhibitors: a systematic review.
J Dermatolog Treat. 2013;24:392–404.
M 
P A
J. Andres Cervera-Servin, Rodney J. Kratz, and Daniel P. Froese

INTRODUCTION

Patients with pruritus ani experience symptoms of perianal itching, burning, or soreness. ese symptoms may occur during the day or night, with higher intensity aer bowel movements, and may even interfere with sleep. e prevalence may increase during the warm summer months with increased sweating and moisture. Pruritus ani aicts 1% to 5% of the population, with men experiencing symptoms more oen than women at a 4:1 ratio, possibly because men have a longer anal canal. e condition predominantly aects persons aged 20 to 40 years and is less common in elderly persons even though they have more frequent episodes of perianal soiling. Itching leads to scratching, which provides temporary relief. However, continued scratching damages the protective skin surface, causing further seep­age, which in turn exacerbates the itching. In this manner a vicious cycle of itching and scratching can develop, and the scratching may lead to a secondary infection. Overuse of wipes, ointments, or other topical treatments that contain chemicals caustic to the skin may worsen the symptoms, and any ointment, although it provides tem­porary relief, ultimately prolongs symptoms because of its wetness. 

ETIOLOGY

e causes of pruritus ani can be classied as primary (idiopathic) and secondary. Primary pruritus ani is most common, but secondary causes must be sought and ruled out before a diagnosis of primary pruritus ani can be made. Secondary causes (listed in Table 9-1) are dealt with initially because they are the easiest to treat once diag­nosed. Diagnosis is determined on the basis of a thorough history and physical examination and a careful examination of the perianal skin. 

PRIMARY CAUSES OF PRURITUS ANI

Aer secondary causes have been ruled out, the remaining cases are the result of idiopathic or primary disease. Perianal skin contact with feces has been established as a cause of pruritus ani, and thus any fecal contamination of perianal skin may be related to the condition. Food may cause the stool to become excessively liquid and acidic. Types of food that may contribute to pruritus ani are listed in Box 9-1. Each of these foods has an intake threshold above which susceptible patients will have pruritus ani and below which they will not have it. ese thresholds vary among individuals.
Compulsive anal cleaning can lead to pruritus ani. Frequent wip­ing with continuous and excessive cleaning can damage the skin and sometimes leads to a secondary bacterial infection that perpetuates and intensies the problem. In the absence of an identiable underly­ing cause, these patients are oen misdiagnosed and mistreated and have persistent symptoms.
Pathophysiology
Pathophysiologic research has helped us understand the underlying disorder. Eyres and ompson noted that symptomatic patients had an exaggerated rectal anal inhibitory reex with rectal distention, leading to subsequent soiling. Allan and coworkers compared symp­tomatic patients with control subjects, and in patients with pruritus, earlier leakage from the anal canal was noted when the rectum was lled with saline solution. Smith etal used anal manometry to dem­onstrate diminished sphincter tone aer ingestion of coee. Farouk etal made three important observations: rst, an internal sphincter pressure decrease that was greater in pruritic subjects than in control subjects; second, a prolonged duration of internal sphincter relax­ation aer rectal distention; and third, symptoms of seepage that cor­related with abnormal sphincter relaxation. All these observations describe an abnormality in internal sphincter function, either as a primary defect or aer ingestion of coee. 

HISTORY

e investigation of pruritus ani is centered on possible causes. Obtaining a complete history is important in narrowing down the possible cause (Box 9-2). 

EXAMINATION

Examination involves careful inspection of the perianal skin for the presence of any seepage or soiling. e appearance of the skin changes may be classied as follows, although it is of limited clinical signicance:
Stage 0: Normal skin Stage 1: Red and inamed skin Stage 2: White, lichenied skin Stage 3: Coarse ridging of the skin with ulceration superimposed on
lichenication
Distribution of the rash is important in that diet-induced pruri­tus ani is centered symmetrically around the anus, whereas an infec­tion is located asymmetrically at the anal orice. is asymmetric, infected rash may occur as a result of scratching during sleep and usually corresponds to the side of the patient’s dominant hand. e diagnosis of specic infections, including scabies and the dermato­phytoses, is sometimes possible with a discerning eye. Upon further inspection one should note the presence of anal disease, including prolapsing hemorrhoids, an anal ssure or stula, skin tags, rectal prolapse, or mucosal ectropion (Box 9-3). Suspicion of any dermato­logic condition mandates examination of the entire body. Anoscopy may reveal redundant internal hemorrhoids or possibly prolapsing rectal mucosa, both of which allow mucus to leak from the anus. In these cases, elastic band ligation may be benecial. 
43
ManageMent of Pruritus ani44
TABLE 9-1: Secondary Causes of Pruritus Ani
Cause Mechanism
Anorectal conditions Rectal prolapse
Hemorrhoids Fistula-in-ano Anal ssure Skin tags, mucosal ectropion Villous adenoma Hidradenitis suppurativa
Seepage either of mucus or
stool leading to inadequate cleanliness; prevention of the anus from closing eectively leads to seepage
Infectious STD
Viral: human papilloma virus, condyloma acuminatum, herpes II Bacterial: gonorrhea, syphilis
Non-STD
Bacterial: tuberculosis, Corynebacterium minutissimum (erythrasma) Fungal: Candida albicans and dermatophytes (e.g., Epidermophyton occosum,
Trichophyton mentagrophytes, and T. rubrum) cause a characteristic unilateral ringworm appearance on the skin
Parasites: pinworm (Enterobius vermicularis), pubic louse (Pediculosis pubis), and
scabies (Sarcoptes scabiei)
Alterations of
fecal continence
Surgical: restorative proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis;
proctosigmoidectomy with coloanal anastomosis Trauma: anal sphincter damage; sexual practices causing chronic anal dilatation Medical: diseases that cause sphincter function loss or deterioration (neurologic:
CVA, MS, and MND)
Primary skin
disorders
Contact dermatitis Psoriasis Eczema, atopic dermatitis, and seborrheic dermatitis Lichen planus and lichen simplex Lichen sclerosus Leukoplakia Radiation dermatitis
Neoplastic Extramammary Paget disease
Bowen disease, anal intraepithelial neoplasia, perianal neoplasms
An underlying irritation or
inability to maintain peri­anal hygiene
Increased exposure of perianal
skin to fecal material as a result of a weakened sphincter and/or absent rectal vault
Contact dermatitis due to
allergens in soaps, deter­gents, bleaches, and even perfumes
Drugs Antidepressants (e.g., Prozac and Zolo), ACE inhibitors (e.g., Captopril and
Vasotec), antibiotics (e.g., ampicillin, amoxicillin, tetracycline, and cephalosporins),
colchicine, digoxin, diuretics, laxatives, and many chemotherapeutic treatments
Systemic disorders Diabetes mellitus
Jaundice Uremia Leukemia, lymphoma
Diarrhea is the common
denominator in most drugs related to pruritus ani
Diabetes mellitus causes
pruritus as a result of inter­nal sphincter weakening, decreased sensation, or fungal overgrowth
ACE, Angiotensin-converting enzyme; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; MND, motor neuron disease; MS, multiple sclerosis; STD, sexually transmitted disease.
BOX 9-1: Foods Possibly Causing Pruritus Ani
•  C o  e e • Beer •  T e a • Milk •  C o l a s
BOX 9-2: Pruritus Ani History
1. Duration and timing of symptoms
2. Obvious precipitating factors: exposure to other people with intense itching, pets, strange environments, chemicals, use of soaps, tissue paper, and even the type of underclothes worn
3. Contact allergens are ruled out by addressing the aforemen-
• Tomatoes • Chocolate • Citrusfruits,vitaminC • Hotspicesandassociatedfoods
ments (including those prescribed to treat pruritus)
4. Hygiene habits are noted
5. Chronic diarrhea: primary or secondary
Continued
ANAL AND PERIANAL REGION 45
BOX 9-2: Pruritus Ani History—Cont’d
 6. Drughistory:ruleoutapossiblepharmaceuticalcause,such
as use of antibiotics
7. Dermatologic conditions of a systemic nature
8. Prior sexually transmitted disease diagnoses and treatment
9. Systemic conditions that may be related, such as diabetes mel­litus, biliary disease, and uremia
10. Dietary habits, especially use of coee, tea, colas, chocolate, beer, milk, tomatoes, citrus fruits, and vitamin C, even in amounts not expected to cause symptoms, such as in multivitamins; excessive uid intake is also noted, along with food allergies, which may necessitate keeping a food and liquid intake diary
11. Presence of soiling, seepage, or full fecal incontinence
BOX 9-3: Examination and Further Diagnostic Testing
Routine
 • Carefulinspectionofperianalregion  • Digitalrectalexamination,anoscopy,orrigidproctoscopy 
Case-by-Case Basis
 • Examinationofskinontheentirebody  • Swabculture(performedbeforetheuseofalubricant)  • Skinscrapingsformycologicexamination  • Skinbiopsy(toruleoutneoplasticchanges)  • Woodlamptestingiferythrasmaissuspectedasaresultof
Corynebacterium minutissimum (the classic nding is pink uorescence due to porphyrin production); erythrasma re­sults in scaly red-brown patches on the perianal skin, axillae, groin, or intergluteal folds
 • Scotchtapetestofperianalskin(todetecteggsinpersons
with a pinworm infestation)
 • Laboratorytests:completebloodcellcountandliverand
renal tests; glucose testing and thyroid function tests may be considered
 • Anorectalmanometrytoassessinternalsphincterfunction
(in specic cases)
 • Colonoscopy(toruleoutproximalneoplasiainpersonswith
refractory pruritus)

TREATMENT

Once a cause is established or excluded, treatment may begin. Cer­tain general therapies are of benet in most cases despite the underly­ing cause. However, sometimes treatment is started without knowing the underlying cause of the pruritus because patients may have tried over-the-counter therapies and may have seen several physicians in their eorts to obtain relief of symptoms (Box 9-4). 

SECONDARY PRURITUS ANI TREATMENT

Any specic cause should be identied and treated aer starting the general measures described in Box 9-4.
BOX 9-4: General Measures for Treatment of Pruritus Ani
General measures aim to keep the perianal region dry and free of further pruritic stimuli:
1. Stop applying soaps, topical creams, or any other therapies to the perianal skin and avoid use of scented toilet paper and wipes, which contain chemicals
2. Stop scratching: Although scratching temporarily relieves symptoms, it perpetuates the problem; it may be necessary to cut ngernails and even wear cotton gloves at night, when most scratching occurs
3. Avoid overcleaning of the perianal region, avoid excessive fric­tion with toilet paper aer bowel movements, and use moist cotton or toilet paper to gently blot the area
4. Wear loose underclothes to allow the perianal skin to dry
5. Review hygiene habits; cleaning with water or hygienic cleans­ing lotion (Balneol) and drying with a cool hair dryer or gentle blotting with a clean cloth are recommended
6. Keeptheperianalareadry:  • Avoiddrugsthatcausediarrheaandothercausesofdiarrhea
(such as certain foods)
 • Usedietaryber(e.g.,Metamucilwafers)toaddbulkto
stools
 • Considercorrectionofanorectalconditionsthatcauseseep-
age (see Table 9-1)
7. Avoid foods possibly related to pruritus (see Box 9-1)
Infections
e following infections may be encountered:
• Sexuallytransmitteddiseases, includinghumanpapillomavirus,
condyloma acuminatum, and herpes simplex (see Chapter 12 for specic treatment)
• Erythrasmawhichistreatedwitha10-daycourseoferythromy-
cin, 250 mg by mouth three times a day
• Tuberculosis(rare)istreatedforafull6months,usuallywithiso-
niazid, rifampin, and pyrazinamide with streptomycin or etham­butol; an infectious disease consultation is recommended
• Secondary infection (signaled by excess scratching) is usually
staphylococcal and is treated with oral dicloxacillin
•  β-Hemolytic streptococcal infections, which tend to recur, are
treated with oral penicillin
• Pinwormistreatedwithmebendazole,100mgbymouthinasin-
gle dose and repeated in 2 weeks; the cure rate is 90% but requires follow-up and treatment of family members in the household
• Pubiclice andscabiesaretreatedwithlindane1%(Kwell),whichis
applied to the infected area, le in place for 8 to 12 hours, and then washed o to prevent adverse eects; this treatment must be repeated in 1 week; alternatives include permethrin and pyrethrin creams
• FungalinfectionsareusuallyduetoaCandidaspecies;treatment
of the underlying systemic condition that fosters this infection is required with topical nystatin, clotrimazole, miconazole, or other antifungal agents
• Dermatophytic infections may require a more specic therapy,
such as salicylate/benzoate compound (Whiteld’s) ointment, if they do not respond to azole agents 
Anorectal Conditions
Causes of seepage and soiling can be corrected by treating these con­ditions with dietary modications and medications. If the conditions fail to improve, surgery or oce procedures, such as hemorrhoidal rubber band ligation, may be considered. Any fecal incontinence should be treated. 
Dermatologic Conditions
Perianal irritation is oen only part of a more extensive condition involving other parts of the body. A dermatology consultation is strongly recommended.
Eczema (atopic dermatitis), psoriasis, lichen planus, lichen sim­plex, and lichen sclerosus respond to general measures and applica­tion of topical steroids.
ManageMent of Pruritus ani46
Leukoplakia requires a ruling out of neoplasia and responds well
to removal of the lesion.
Contact dermatitis requires removal of the allergen and use of top­ical, mild steroids. Long-term use of a strong steroid can break down the skin barrier, creating a chronic scenario, and is to be avoided. 
Neoplastic Causes
e most important step is to diagnose and recognize neoplastic con­ditions as the cause of pruritus ani and treat the patient accordingly. Extramammary Paget disease, Bowen disease, and anal intraepithelial neoplasia should always be considered with a high index of suspicion. Any lesions of concern warrant a biopsy to rule out any carcinomas or melanoma for both diagnosis and potential relief of symptoms prior to denitive treatment (see specic chapters for detailed treat­ment protocols). 
Systemic Disease
Diabetes, jaundice, and uremia require therapy to improve pruritus symptoms by bringing blood levels of glucose, bilirubin, and urea to a normal range. In persons with biliary disease and uremia, cholestyr­amine may be helpful to control the diarrhea. 
TREATMENT OF PRIMARY
PRURITUS ANI
Traditionally, primary (idiopathic) pruritus has mainly been consid­ered to be due to dietary factors (see Box 9-1). Fecal soiling is also an important cause. It is possible that most of the “idiopathic” cases
are due to causes that have not been identied but result in perianal irritation in susceptible persons, as demonstrated by Caplan’s study.
Treatment includes dietary restriction of foods that are possibly related to the condition (see Box 9-1). A thorough and systematic dietary history is required to determine which foods might be con­tributing to the problem. In recalcitrant cases, it may be necessary to keep a detailed food and uid intake diary. Patients are instructed to eliminate any substance from their diet that seems to be related to their condition. Aer removal of the oending agent, at least 2 to 3 weeks may elapse before the symptoms cease. In long-standing cases even more time may be required, and thus perseverance is encour­aged. Once relief is obtained, some of the foods may be reintroduced to an identied “threshold,” which will be dierent for each individ­ual. Staying below that threshold is then appropriate in the long term to prevent symptom recurrence. 

REFRACTORY OR PERSISTENT PRURITUS ANI

When symptoms remain severe despite dietary restrictions, the patient will need to take further steps to obtain relief (Box 9-5). ese steps should be applied together with the general measures described in Box 9-4 and the dietary restrictions previously outlined. 

SUMMARY

Pruritus ani is common, and in almost all cases the cause may be identied by a careful history and examination of the perianal area (Fig. 9-1). Most patients will benet from use of the general mea- sures described in Box 9-4, as well as specic treatment of the pri­mary cause. Further investigation and/or treatment may be required
BOX 9-5: Options for Treating Refractory Pruritus Ani
1. Topical treatment
 • Irrigatetherectumaerabowelmovementtoremovefecal
residue and then place a cotton ball or white so tissue in the anal canal to block fecal seepage and absorb moisture away from the skin; cornstarch or talc on the perianal skin may aid in drying the skin
 • Useofbarriercreams,includingcalamine,Calmoseptine,or
zinc oxide, is safe; they may be used on a long-term basis to avoid chronic moisture on the skin
 • Useofasteroid-basedointmentissafeandeectiveinalow
dose (e.g., hydrocortisone 1%), but such an ointment should be used for a limited amount of time (no more than 3 weeks)
 • Hydrocortisone,aglucocorticoidwithanti-inammatory,
antipruritic, and vasoconstrictive properties, decreases local inammation, itching, and swelling
 • Steroidcombinedwithothermedications:
Hydrocortisone acetate 1%, but never more than 2.5%, com-
bined with pramoxine (a local anesthetic), is also eective
A combination of hydrocortisone/iodoquinol (Vytone) and
clotrimazole (Lotrimin) is used when infection is sus­pected, with dicloxacillin recommended for persons with a proven, severe infection
Antifungal creams and ointments, with rst-line azole deriva-
tives (e.g., clotrimazole) used for specic infections
Capsaicin: an alkaloid derivative used to relieve pain and
itching; the precise mechanism of action is unknown, but evidence suggests that capsaicin depresses the synthesis, storage, and release of substance P (a mediator for pain and itch impulses to the central nervous system); a study by Lysy etal demonstrated relief of perianal itching in 31 of 44
subjectsusing0.006%capsaicincomparedwithonesubject
in a placebo group
2. Consultation with dermatology  • Ifthepatientisnotrespondingtorst-linetherapy,anunder-
lying dermatologic condition should be excluded; Dasan etal found that 34 of 41 patients studied in a combined colorectal and dermatological clinic had a dermatosis, which supports referral to a dermatologist in the rst instance
3. Surgical therapy
 • Correctionofanyrelatedanorectalconditions(seeTable 9-1)  • Subcutaneousinjectionofatopicalanestheticandmethylene
blue; the exact mechanism of action is unknown, although it is believed it may be toxic to nerves supplying the perianal skin; Sutherlandetalreporteda96%improvementand57%resolu­tion in 49 patients with an 8-week follow-up (complications included transitory incontinence and a decrease in perianal sensation), whereas Salamavicius reported a 20% success rate with a long-term follow-up of 47 months; previous studies have reported severe complications, including full-thickness skin necrosis and cellulitis (some investigators believe these complications were due to the amount and concentration of methylene blue used); we have no experience in use of this technique and thus cannot make any recommendations regarding its use
4. Alternatives under research
 • Topicaltacrolimus:Ucaketalperformedarandomized
controlledtrialthatincluded16patientswithpruritusaniand
atopic dermatitis who were treated with 0.03% tacrolimus and placebo; the investigators concluded that topical tacrolimus was well tolerated and eective in controlling pruritus ani in this setting
ANAL AND PERIANAL REGION 47
History and physical
(Box 9-2)
Anoscopy, rigid proctoscopy
SECONDARY CAUSE IDENTIFIED
NO
General measures (Box 9-4)
Consider dermatology consult
RESOLUTION OF SYMPTOMS
NO YES
Dermatology consult
Consider options for refractory or persistent
pruritus ani (Box 9-5)
Case-by-case basis examinations as
needed (Box 9-3)
YES
General measures (Box 9-4)
and treat secondary cause
Follow-up
Continue treatment (chronic condition)
FIGURE 9-1 Recommended
algorithm for pruritus ani.
in patients who do not respond to rst-line therapy. A dermatology consultation should always be considered, particularly when treat­ment is not eective.

S u g g e S t e d R e a d i n g

Allan A, Ambrose NS, Silverman S,Keighley MRB. Physiological study of
pruritus ani. Br J Surg.1987;74:576–579.
Caplan RM. e irritant role of feces in the genesis of perianal itch. Gastroen-
terology.1966;50:19–23.
Dasan S, Neill SM, Donaldson R, Scott HJ. Treatment of persistent pru-
ritus ani in a combined colorectal and dermatological clinic. Br J Surg.
1999;86:1337–1340.
Eyres AA, ompson JPS. Pruritus ani: is anal sphincter dysfunction impor-
tant in etiology? BMJ.1979;2:1549–1551.
Farouk R, Duthie GS, Pryde A, Bartolo DCC. Abnormal transient internal
sphincter relaxation in idiopathic pruritus ani: physiological evidence from ambulatory monitoring. Br J Surg.1994;81:603–606.
Farouk R, Lee PWR. Intradermal methylene blue injection for the treatment
of intractable idiopathic pruritus ani. Br J Surg.1997;84:670.
Friend WG. e causes and treatment of idiopathic pruritus ani. Dis Colon
Rectum.1977;20:40–42.
MarkellK, Billingham R. Pruritus ani: etiology and management. Surg Clin N
Am.2010;90:125–135.
Nasseri Y, Osborne M. Pruritus ani: diagnosis and treatment. Gastroenterol
Clin North Am.2013;42:801–813.
Pirone E, Infantino A, Masin A, etal. Can proctologic procedures resolve peri-
anal pruritus and mycosis? Int J Colorect Dis.1992;7:18–20.
Salamavicius NE, Poskus T, Gupta RK, Lunevicius R. Long-term results of
single intradermal 1% methylene blue injection of intractable idiopathic pruritus ani: a prospective study. Tech Coloproctol.2012;16:295–299.
Siddiqi S, Vijay V, Ward M, et al. Pruritus ani. Ann R Coll Surg Engl.
2008;90:457–463.
Smith LE, Henrichs D, McCullah RD. Prospective studies in the etiology and
treatment of pruritus ani. Dis Colon Rectum.1982;25:358–363.
Sutherland AD, Faragher IG, Frizelle FA. Intradermal injection of meth-
ylene blue for the treatment of refractory pruritus ani. Colorect Dis.
2009;11:282–287.
Ucak H, Demir B, Cicek D, etal. Ecacy of topical tacrolimus for the treat-
ment of persistent pruritus ani in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Derma-
tolog Treat.2013;24(6):454–457.
C  M

 A S
Theodore E. Eisenstat and Jason Penzer

INTRODUCTION

Anal stenosis (also referred to as anal stricture) is an abnormal nar­rowing of the anus that oen occurs aer colon and rectal surgery. e diagnosis of anal stenosis is suggested by a history of constipation and diculty in passing stool. Patients oen have a history of anal surgery, inammatory bowel disease, radiation treatment, or anorec­tal infection. e diagnosis is conrmed by physical examination. 

DEFINITION

e anal canal may be dened as the part of the alimentary tract from the anal verge to the anorectal ring (at the level of the levator muscle). Scarring and contracture may occur in a narrow bandlike fashion at the anal verge or occasionally may involve the entire anal canal with a thick, unyielding contracture. Severe stenosis may be dened by the inability to pass an 11-mm scope or the index nger into the anal canal. Stenosis of this degree is usually symptomatic and oen requires operative treatment.
Sometimes the stenosis is due to an abnormally high tone in the internal sphincter. is condition is sometimes referred to as anismus (internal sphincter spasm). Anal manometry may be of value in doc­umenting the spasm; a “saw tooth” pressure pattern is common. If the stenosis is due to scarring or a tumor, manometry is not very help­ful. However, measurement of rectal compliance, anorectal sensation, and the integrity of the rectoanal inhibitory reex will complete the picture of the patient’s adaptation to his or her condition. 

CLASSIFICATION OF ANAL STENOSIS

Cause
Anal stenosis may be broadly classied by its cause (Box 10-1).
Spasm
Anal spasm (anismus) causes a tight anal canal that is painful and impossible to examine in the oce. One of the common causes of internal sphincter spasm is an anal ssure. However, the spasm of a ssure is not a true stenosis. Painful anal spasm is an indication for examination with use of an anesthetic. Narrowing associated with spasm will disappear as the anesthetic relaxes the sphincters, whereas a stricture due to scarring will persist. Stenosis associated with internal sphincter spasm and a painful anal ssure is generally treated with a lateral internal sphincterotomy, which is discussed in
Chapter 3. 
Postoperative Scarring
Postoperative scarring is the most common cause of an anal stenosis. e anal canal is a small oval tube, and incisions made in the mucosa heal with contracture, producing a circular scar that inevitably tight­ens. is outcome is characteristic of all circular wounds, such as anas­tomoses. Ileal pouch–anal anastomoses can be hand sewn or stapled. Stapled anastomoses are prone to weblike strictures because of the diverting ileostomy, but these strictures are easily dilated at the time of stoma closure. Hand-sewn anastomoses can form denser strictures that may be symptomatic, oen requiring repeated dilations. Anal stenosis is also common aer a hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer, especially when neoadjuvant radiation has been admin­istered. e radiation makes stenosis relatively resistant to dilation, and thus frequent stretching with use of an anesthetic may be needed.
Anal mucosal stripping aer stapled ileal pouch–anal anastomo­sis for retained anal transition zone is a potent cause of a dense anal stenosis. To avoid this consequence, consider stripping half the cir­cumference at one operation and the other half later, aer the rst half has healed.
Postoperative strictures at the anal verge or in the external anal canal are usually due to excision of excessive amounts of anoderm during anorectal operations—especially hemorrhoidectomy—or overambitious electrocoagulation/excision of anal warts. 
Stenosis Due to Chronic Diarrhea
e anal canal relies on passage of a formed stool for maintenance of its suppleness and dilatability. In persons with chronic diarrhea, the anus never naturally stretches, and over time it tends to lose the ability to dilate. is tendency is worse in patients with anal inam­mation, such as that found in association with inammatory bowel disease (Crohn-related colitis and ulcerative colitis). e presence of active inammatory bowel disease, especially with rectal involvement or suppuration, may also prevent surgical correction of a stricture. Occasionally, fecal diversion will be required in this group of patients. Gentle dilation aer induction of anesthesia with a lubricated dilator has been reported to have a good eect in some patients. is suc­cess is thought to be related to the absence of new wounds in these patients with inammatory bowel disease and carries the caveat of using minimal dilation that is just adequate to allow the passage of semiliquid stool without disrupting the sphincters. 
Age-Related Stenosis
Anal stenosis may develop in elderly and senile patients or patients with Alzheimer disease who chronically abuse laxatives. Care must be taken to avoid surgery in these patients whose continence may, in part, depend upon the presence of anal stenosis. Both the anal
48
ANAL AND PERIANAL REGION 49
BOX 10-1: Common Causes of Anal Stenosis
• Sphincterspasm(analssure) • Postoperativescarring • Anastomoticstenosis • Inammatoryboweldisease • Chronicsuppuration • Chronicdiarrhea • Radiation • Venerealdisease • Congenitalmalformation(imperforateanus,stenosis,or
membrane)
• Neoplasm(benignormalignantanal,perianal,orrectallesions) • Trauma(lacerations,crush,thermalinjury,chemicalinjury) • Infection(tuberculosis,lymphogranulomavenereum,schisto-
somiasis, syphilis, actinomycosis)
• Ischemia
stenosis and the atrophy of the sphincters are due to passage of only liquid stools and the lack of natural dilatation by formed movements. Use of mineral oil has been implicated in these patients. Caution is advised in management because correction of the anal stenosis may result in severe incontinence. Education with regard to bowel habits and diet may alleviate symptoms.
Other causes of stenosis are listed in Box 10-1. 
Other Classification Schemes for Anal Stenosis
Other classication schemes for anal stenosis have been described. On the basis of severity, Milsom and Mazier distinguished mild, moderate, and severe anal stenosis. Persons with mild anal stenosis have a tight anal canal that can be traversed by a well-lubricated index nger or a medium Hill-Ferguson retractor. In persons with moder­ate anal stenosis, forceful dilatation is required to insert either the index nger or a medium Hill-Ferguson retractor. In persons with severe anal stenosis, neither the little nger nor a small Hill-Ferguson retractor can be inserted unless a forceful dilatation is employed. Fur­thermore, stenoses may be diaphragmatic (characterized by a thin strip of constrictor tissue in the presence of inammatory bowel dis­ease), ringlike or anular (aer development of surgical or traumatic lesions of a length <2 cm), or tubular (with a length >2 cm). Based on the level of anal canal aected, stenosis also may be distinguished as low, middle, high, or diuse. Low stenosis, which occurs in 65% of patients, is located at the distal anal canal at least 0.5 cm below the dentate line. Middle stenosis, which occurs in 18.5% of patients, is 0.5 cm proximal to 0.5 cm distal to the dentate line. High stenosis, which is found in 8.5% of patients, is proximal to 0.5 cm above the dentate line. Diuse stenosis, found throughout the anal canal, aects 6.5% of patients. 

SYMPTOMS

Symptoms associated with anal stenosis include constipation, because the stool will not easily traverse the stenotic area; incontinence, because liquid seeps uncontrollably around the fecal bolus that lies above the stricture; and pain from the anus itself and the overfull rec­tum above. Persons with chronic obstruction from the stenosis can experience abdominal pain and bloating.
Examination Findings
Examination may reveal evidence of surgery, such as scarring, or dis­tortion of the perianal tissues. Signs of inammatory bowel disease also may be present, such as tags or chronic ssures.
e anal tone can be gauged through a gentle attempt at digital examination using a large amount of lubricant and starting with the h nger. At the same time, physical stenosis can be detected. For many patients, the examination will need to be performed with use of an anesthetic to avoid discomfort. 

PREVENTION OF POSTOPERATIVE ANAL STENOSIS

Postoperative anal stenosis is usually preventable. Good surgical technique preserves anoderm during excisional procedures, such as a hemorrhoidectomy. When performing the classic closed Fer­guson hemorrhoidectomy, three (or at most, four) hemorrhoids may be removed. During the procedure, adequate bridges of ano­derm between excisions must be preserved. If, at the completion of the procedure, the largest Hill-Ferguson (3.5 cm) anoscope can be introduced into the anal canal, development of postoperative stric­tures will be unlikely. Severe postoperative stenosis has occurred aer the “Whitehead” hemorrhoidectomy has been performed, although when it is performed correctly, this procedure should not result in anal stenosis or ectropion. Rather than risk a post­operative stenosis by sacricing too much anoderm, it is prefer­able to leave behind some hemorrhoids; later banding of residual internal hemorrhoids and excision of skin tags is far easier than correction of a stenosis from overaggressive excision. e surgeon should be especially conservative when operating in the presence of acute hemorrhoidal disease. Postoperatively, ber or a bulking agent should be prescribed to ensure daily bowel movements. e dilating eect of a well-formed stool daily is key in preventing post­operative stenosis. 

TREATMENT

Nonoperative Management
Treatment of anal stenosis depends on its severity and symptoms. Asymptomatic anal stenosis requires no treatment, unless access to the rectum is needed for endoscopy or for a procedure. Patients with chronic diarrhea may have a stenosis but no symptoms. In such cases, use of a bulk-forming agent may precipitate symptoms, and it is better just to let the diarrhea continue. Patients with mild to moderate symptoms may require only dietary adjustment and counseling. Dietary manipulation (generally with reduced ber intake) and the use of stool soeners will provide symptomatic relief. Severe stenosis and symptoms usually require surgical correction.
Stenosis that follows anorectal surgery initially should be man­aged conservatively. A waiting period of 3 to 6 months is appropriate to allow maturation of the scar and adaptation of the mechanism of defecation. Symptoms sometimes resolve with conservative manage­ment and regular oce dilation. Anal dilators may be used, but use of an index nger is preferable. 
Anal Dilation
Anal dilation with use of an anesthetic allows assessment of the diameter, length, intensity, and nature of the stenosis. Dilation to permit insertion of a closed anoscope or a Hill-Ferguson retractor can be performed with a well-lubricated finger or a set of gradu­ated anal dilators. Scar tissue can be broken during the dilation. A weblike stricture can be incised in four quadrants using dia­thermy, which will be a permanent cure. A lengthier stricture is dilated and the scarring is injected with steroids (triamcinolone [Kenalog], 40 mg [1 mL] in 5 mL of saline solution). The steroid reduces the tendency for the stricture to re-form. In some patients
Cause and ManageMent of anal stenosis50
FIGURE 10-1 Simple anotomy. (From Oliver GC, Rubin RJ. Anoplasty. In:
Fielding LP, Goldberg SM, eds. Rob & Smith’s Operative Surgery: Surgery of the Colon, Rectum and Anus. 5th ed. London: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1993.)
a series of elective dilations can be advised because the scar tissue will stabilize over time. 
Surgical Management
Surgery is indicated for symptomatic patients who are not helped by conservative treatment. A careful sphincterotomy or a Botox injection are options for stenosis caused by spasm of the internal sphincter. e sphincterotomy is performed with a closed technique, incising for the length of the sphincter on either side. e blade is drawn across the medial surface of the muscle, and a few bers are divided. It is bet­ter to be more conservative, even though the patient may have to return for more sphincter division, than aggressive and risk incontinence.
For a moderate stenosis due to an actual stricture, simple release of the stricture with a lateral incision (anotomy) may suce (Fig. 10-1). is incision is generally performed in an open fashion, with the wound le open to heal by secondary intention. Granulation of this wound may result in a more adequate orice in contrast to primary closure. Occasionally, a repeat stricture will occur with healing, and multiple anotomies are sometimes necessary (Fig. 10-2).
For severe anal strictures, simple release of the stricture or scar tis­sue is usually inadequate because as healing occurs, the contracture re-forms. erefore, transposition of healthy, viable epithelium into the defect that results aer release of the stricture is required. is transposition can be accomplished either by advancing the mucosa outward or by moving skin into the defect. Mucosal ectropion and scar tissue should be excised during release of the stricture. Because advancement of the mucosa beyond the dentate line will create an ectropion, it is usually preferable to bring skin into the anal canal. 
FIGURE 10-2 Multiple anotomies. (From Oliver GC, Rubin RJ. Anoplasty.
In: Fielding LP, Goldberg SM, eds. Rob & Smith’s Operative Surgery: Surgery of the Colon, Rectum and Anus. 5th ed. London: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1993.)
Anoplasty
When loss of anoderm has been signicant and the stricture is severe, anoplasty is required. One of several ap-type procedures may be used, depending on the severity of the stricture and the resultant deformity aer excision of the scar tissue. In increasing order of mag-
nitude,these proceduresarea“Y-V”advancementap,an“island”
advancement ap, and an “S” plasty. Advancement aps provide viable tissue to ll the defect that remains aer stricture excision and prevent recurrent contracture. All but the most extensive of these procedures can be performed using intravenous sedation and a local anesthetic, although induction of general anesthesia provides a com­fortable experience for the patient and avoids the distortion caused by a local anesthetic; exposure is best with the patient in the prone position.
e operation begins by excising scar tissue and restoring the length and diameter of the anus, which will result in a “bare” area that used to be contracted within the stricture but now needs to be covered by epithelium. is coverage is generally achieved with a ap.
Historically, a “Y-V”–type advancement ap has been used to
replace anoderm. An anotomy is performed and continued into a Y-shaped incision to create a ap, which may be advanced into the anal canal. is procedure can be performed in any of the four anal quadrants. Although we most frequently use a single lateral site, the procedure may be performed bilaterally. Limitations relate to the dis­tance this ap can be moved and the resultant tension on the ap. Occasionally, necrosis of the tip may occur but will not result in reste­nosis, as long as the width of the interposed ap remains viable.
“Island” aps are recommended for larger defects that require further advancement of viable tissue. “Island” aps should be con­structed in such a manner that they include the attached subcutane­ous tissue and an adequate blood supply. Closure of the skin defect behind these aps aids in securing the ap within the anal canal and relieving tension; this maneuver also tends to push the ap into the