Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_927_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
31 Мб
Скачать
COMPLICATIONS 461
Flowable Hemostatic Agents
Flowable hemostatic agents such as Surgio (Ethicon, Inc.) and FloSeal (Baxter Healthcare Corp., Deereld, Ill.) are composed of either a porcine or bovine gelatin matrix plus thrombin. ese agents provide both a mechanical and an active hemostat in a single appli­cation. Surgio is a porcine gelatin that is used in combination with bovine or other thrombins. Floseal consists of bovine microgranules combined with human pooled plasma thrombin and calcium chlo­ride. Both agents allow for more accurate administration compared with liquid thrombin alone because human plasma thrombin solidi­es into a pastelike consistency when combined with gelatin. Flow­able agents require 2 to 3 minutes of preparation and are applied with a syringe. e ecacy and safety of Surgio and FloSeal are similar. Flowable hemostatic agents have been shown to be eective in vascu­lar and cardiac surgeries in which heavy bleeding can occur. 
Fibrin Sealants
Fibrin sealants are absorbable dressings that contain brinogen and thrombin that can be applied to raw surfaces to create a watertight occlusive eect. Fibrin sealants enhance clot formation by deliver­ing higher concentrations of brinogen and thrombin at the bleeding site. Fibrin sealants are appropriate for use in patients with coagu­lopathy who do not have sucient brinogen to form a clot. ey are eective for control of both local and diuse bleeding.
Tisseel (Baxter Healthcare Corp.) includes human brinogen and thrombin from pooled donors, as well as aprotinin to prevent breakdown of clot. Although ecacious, preparation is complex and involves a two-syringe system that requires stirring and warming for 20 minutes using a device called a Fibrinotherm (Baxter Healthcare Corp.). is procedure is not ideal for use in emergent settings such as presacral bleeding.
Evicel (Ethicon) is human pooled brinogen and human pooled thrombin. Before use it must be thawed, which can take up to 10 min­utes. One benet is that it can be delivered with a pressure regula­tor to form a thin lm over broad bleeding surfaces with no distinct bleeding site. 
Although presacral hemorrhage is an uncommon event, the operat­ing surgeon must be prepared to control hemorrhage when it occurs. Communication with the operating room team and anesthesia team is critical. Direct pressure is the initial management; exposure of the eld allows the bleeding site to be identied and appropriate hemo­static technique to be used. Because even profuse bleeding can almost always be controlled with pressure, the decision regarding a technique for hemostasis does not need to be made quickly. It is important to know all of the options available to control bleeding because some cases require a series of attempts at control before success is achieved. With proper preparation and a systematic approach, the situation can always be salvaged.

S e l e c t e d R e a d i n g

Bague P, Karimdjee B, Iannelli A, etal. Anatomy of the presacral venous plex-
us: implications for rectal surgery. Surg Radiol Anat. 2004;26(5):355–358.
Beck D, Roberts P, Saclarides T, etal., eds. e ASCRS Textbook of Colon and
Rectal Surgery. 2nd ed. Arlington Heights, IL: American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons; 2009.
D’Ambra L, Berti S, Bonfante P, etal. Hemostatic step-by-step procedure to
control sacral bleeding during laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. World J Surg. 2009;33:812–815.
Harrison JL, Hooks VH, Pearl RK, etal. Muscle fragment welding for control
of massive presacral bleeding during rectal mobilization. Dis Colon Rec- tum. 2003;46(8):1115–1117.
Jiang J, Li X, Wang Y, etal. Circular suture ligation of presacral venous plexus
to control presacral venous bleeding during rectal mobilization. J Gastro- intest Surg. 2013;17(2):416–420.
Lou Z, Zhang W, Meng R-G, Fu C-G. Massive presacral bleeding during
rectal surgery: From anatomy to clinical practice. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(25):4039–4044.
Metzger P. Modied packing technique for control of presacral pelvic bleed-
ing. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;31(12):981–982.
Pollard CW, Nivatvongs S, Rojanasakul A, Ilstrup DM. Carcinoma of the rec-
tum. Proles of intraoperative and early postoperative complications. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:866–874.
Van der Vurst TJ, Bodegom ME, Rakic S. Tamponade of presacral hemor-
rhage with hemostatic sponges xed to the sacrum with endoscopic heli­cal trackers: report of two cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:1550–1553.
Wang QY, Shi WJ, Zhao YR, etal. New concepts in severe presacral hemor-
rhage during proctectomy. Arch Surg. 1985;120:1013–1020.

CONCLUSION

Hemorrhage during pelvic surgery can lead to a life-threatening situ­ation. Understanding pelvic anatomy is critical to avoiding this situ­ation because prevention is much preferred to treatment of bleeding.

U I  C S
Bradley C. Gill and Drogo K. Montague

INTRODUCTION

Urologic issues pertaining to colorectal surgery can be broadly cat­egorized according to the organ involved: the ureter, bladder, or ure­thra and their associated nerves and vessels. Because both colorectal surgeons and urologists have become more familiar with laparoscopic techniques, urologic issues encountered in colorectal surgery oen may be addressed in a minimally invasive fashion without conversion to an open surgery. In this chapter we will discuss the common situa­tions in which colorectal surgeons and urologists interact. 

INFECTION

Perioperative urinary tract infections can be encountered aer ure­thral catheterization and other instrumentation of the urinary tract. Both urinalysis (unless strongly positive) and irritative voiding symp­toms soon aer urethral catheter removal may be unreliable indica­tors of infection. However, if symptoms persist or other clinical signs of infection develop and are unrelated to the recent surgery, a urine sample should be collected in a sterile fashion and sent for culture. Empiric antibiotic coverage is started, using twice daily ciprooxacin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Aer the results of the urine cul­ture are available, the antibiotics should be discontinued or changed, as appropriate.
A urinary tract infection may present outside the postoperative period. In this situation, a urinalysis may be more reliable. If a uri­nalysis suggests infection, a urine sample collected in a sterile fash­ion should be sent for culture. Treatment with the rst-line agents mentioned previously should be pursued and tailored to the culture results unless prior microbiology data document resistance to such an agent. If infections are recurrent and the organism is the same, a urologic workup is required because the cause may be a foreign body (e.g., a suture or stone) or an anatomic abnormality (e.g., diverticu­lum). If recurrent infections with diering enteric organisms develop, a search for an enteric-urinary stula should be considered. 

URETER

e normal anatomic position of the ureter in the retroperitoneum places it at risk when the ascending and descending colon, the sig­moid colon, and the rectum are mobilized. Furthermore, obstruction, inammation, neoplasm, radiation, or changes caused by prior pro­cedures may cause the ureter to deviate from its usual course. Pre­operative identication of the ureters may avoid inadvertent injury, especially when a challenging or even routine but extensive retroperi­toneal dissection is anticipated. is scenario prompts one of the most common preoperative, and at times intraoperative, consultations received by urologists. e placement of temporary ureteral stents is relatively low risk and not only helps with ureteral identication but
462
also can aid in the recognition of injury and facilitation of its repair. If a ureter is denuded, crushed, subject to electrocautery at close prox­imity, or otherwise thought to be at risk of damage or stricture, place­ment of an indwelling stent (i.e., a JJ stent) that can be le for up to 2 months should be considered.
If the ureter is injured or partially excised, direct reanastomosis is preferred. e principles underlying choice of direct reanastomo­sis are similar to those of intestinal anastomosis and include main­tenance of a robust ureteral blood supply, creation of a wide-caliber ureteroureterostomy, and a tension-free anastomosis. Mobilization of the ureter is required to facilitate this procedure, but avoidance of skeletonizing the ureter preserves its blood supply and reduces the risk of anastomotic stenosis. e two ureteral ends are spatulated, one on its anterior surface and the other on its posterior surface, and subsequently approximated with transmural resorbing stitches (Fig.
88-1). Permanent suture material should never be used in the urinary
tract because of the risk of calculus formation and development of a nidus for infection. Prior to placement of the last one or two stitches, a ureteral JJ stent is inserted to allow anastomotic healing and facili­tate urinary drainage. Such a procedure can be performed laparo­scopically, if this is the approach used by the colorectal surgeon and the urologist is skilled in minimally invasive surgery. Generally, stents are le in place for up to 6 weeks and then removed via cystoscopy with imaging (the type of imaging study used depends on the urolo­gist’s preference) to conrm ureteral patency.
Injury of the distal ureter may be better managed by reimplan­tation into the bladder via a ureteroneocystostomy than by ureteral reanastomosis. As with a ureteroureterostomy, mobilization of the ureter to facilitate a tension-free anastomosis is required, and avoid­ance of ureteral skeletonization to maintain blood supply is essential. When the surgery is performed in an open manner, and if sucient ureteral length is available, a nonreuxing reimplantation may be performed. Along with mobilizing the ureter, this procedure involves opening the bladder anteriorly and passing the ureter through a sub­mucosal tunnel extending from a posterolateral bladder wall stab incision to the trigone (Fig. 88-2, A and B). e length of the tunnel should be two or three times the width of the ureter, with the end of the ureter spatulated and anastomosed to the trigone mucosa (Figure
88-2, C and D). e submucosal tunnel closure and new ureteral ori-
ce are created with one layer of suture while the anterior cystotomy is closed in two layers, with the mucosa and detrusor approximated separately. A urethral catheter is then le indwelling for 10 to 14 days to minimize bladder pressure and facilitate healing.
Loss of a critical length of ureter may make a tension-free uretero­ureterostomy and a nonreuxing ureteral reimplantation impossible. In such situations, simple reimplantation into the bladder dome with a reuxing ureteroneocystostomy may be performed. is proce­dure involves dissecting through the bladder wall until the mucosa is reached, spatulating the ureteral end, and then incising the mucosa and anastomosing the ureter to the bladder. e ureteroneocystos­tomy is reinforced by closing the detrusor over the anastomosis site.
FIGURE 88-1 A ureteroureterostomy is performed after spatulating
the ureteral ends on opposing surfaces to create a wide anastomosis.
When simple reimplantation is impossible for the lack of a few centi­meters of length, a psoas hitch may be performed. is procedure is performed by tacking the bladder to the ipsilateral psoas fascia on the side of ureteral injury, thus raising the bladder wall superiorly. When this procedure is not sucient, a Boari ap may be fashioned, which involves tubularizing a full-thickness ap of bladder wall, securing it to the ipsilateral psoas fascia, and performing an end-ureteral anas­tomosis to this (Fig. 88-3). Any of these three procedures may be per­formed during laparoscopic surgery.
Less commonly, with a shortened ureter a transureteroureteros­tomy can be performed, which involves tunneling the injured ureter retroperitoneally and creating an end-to-side anastomosis with the contralateral ureter. is procedure is limited to open abdominal sur­gery. It also has fallen out of favor because of the risk inherent to both kidneys, with disease developing in the solitary distal ureter. In situa­tions of severe ureteral shortening, an ileal interposition or creation of an ileal ureter may be performed and can be completed laparoscopi­cally. is procedure involves mobilizing a segment of ileum with suf­cient length to reach from the renal pelvis to the bladder, passing this segment retroperitoneally through a window in the colonic mesentery, and anastomosing its ends to the renal pelvis and bladder (Fig. 88-4). Using an ileal ureter subjects the patient to metabolic, infectious, and oncologic risks associated with placing bowel in contact with the uri­nary tract. Alternatively, renal autotransplantation can be considered if all other options have been exhausted. In this open procedure, the kid­ney is repositioned in the iliac fossa with vascular anastomoses to the iliac vessels and a simple ureteroneocystostomy into the bladder dome.
Unrecognized ureteral injuries generally present as either an obstruction or a leak. Obstruction will present with hydrouretero­nephrosis or hydronephrosis, depending on the level of the injury,
COMPLICATIONS 463
which is oen accompanied by ipsilateral ank discomfort and renal or ureteral colic. Decreased renal function also may be observed. Diagnosis of such an injury is best achieved by imaging with an ultrasound or computed tomography scan with use of intravenous contrast material avoided, if possible, to limit damage to the kid­ney. Management includes immediate placement of a percutaneous nephrostomy tube and denitive surgical repair at least 2 months postoperatively. Leaks may present as either a urethrocutaneous stula through the surgical wound, a urinoma, or urinary ascites. e development of ureteroenteric stulas has also been observed, albeit rarely. If a stula is suspected, laboratory assessment of the uid will aid diagnosis because a creatinine level higher than that of the serum concentration confirms a urine leak. A diagnosis of a urinoma is generally based on imaging, whereas urinary ascites may present with metabolic derangements and decreased urine output suspicious for acute kidney injury. Regardless, treatment is gener­ally the same as for obstruction and involves diversion of urinary ow by placement of an indwelling ureteral stent via cystoscopy or a percutaneous nephrostomy tube. Cystoscopy also provides the abil­ity to perform retrograde ureteropyelograms and identify the loca­tion and extent of the ureteral injury, whereas a urogram requiring intravenous contrast material may be contraindicated if the serum creatinine level is elevated. 

BLADDER

The bladder may be injured inadvertently or intentionally incised during colorectal surgery, especially if it is involved with an adher­ent, invasive neoplasm. If an injury is suspected, the bladder may be filled with methylene blue solution via a urethral catheter and the surgical field closely inspected for leakage. Any such leakage can be localized and the bladder closed in two layers. This pro­cedure may be performed laparoscopically. If the injury presents late, it generally will appear as a urine leak, similar to that of a ureteral injury. Specifically, formation of a vesicocutaneous fis­tula may occur at the surgical wound, and a urinoma or urinary ascites also may occur. Diagnosis is similar to that of a ureteral injury. Wound drainage can be sent for creatinine measurement, and a cystogram can be obtained by contrast instillation through a urethral catheter.
Small urinary leaks from the bladder will generally resolve by maintaining a low bladder pressure with an indwelling urethral cath­eter for 10 to 14 days. Larger leaks may require surgery, in which case an anterior cystotomy can be created for a transvesical repair, leav­ing the colorectal surgical site and peritoneal cavity undisturbed. e defect is closed with transmural sutures and the anterior cystotomy in two layers, as described previously. A closed suction drain or pas­sive tubing drain is placed in the perivesical space and removed 3 or 4 days later, whereas a urethral catheter is le indwelling for 10 to 14 days. Some urologists obtain a cystogram prior to removal of the urethral catheter.
Fistula formation between the bladder and bowel may also occur, either iatrogenically or as a result of diseases such as inammatory bowel disease, diverticulitis, or neoplasm. Clinical presentation with fecaluria, pneumaturia, or recurrent urinary tract infection with enteric organisms should raise suspicion. Diagnosis is generally performed though use of a cystogram or barium enema, but cross­sectional imaging and cystoscopy may detect more severe instances. Alternative, outpatient strategies to aid in detection include having patients take activated charcoal or consume an amount of poppy seeds and then observing the urine for the presence of such. Once a diagnosis is conrmed, treatment entails resection of the stula from both the bowel and bladder, primary repair of the cystotomy and enterotomy, and interposition of a tissue ap, such as omen­tum. Drainage of the perivesical space and maintenance of a low­pressure bladder with a urethral catheter are required, along with fecal diversion. 
Urologic issUes in colorectal sUrgery464
A
B
C
FIGURE 88-2 A, A ureteroneocystostomy is started by opening the bladder anteriorly and making a stab incision for the ureter. B, A submucosal
tunnel is created to prevent vesicoureteral reflux. C, The ureter is then brought through the tunnel, and the original stab incision is closed. D, The ureteroneocystostomy is completed by anchoring the end of the ureter to the bladder wall.

URETHRA

Urethral injury during surgery most commonly occurs from traumatic insertion of a urethral catheter. is injury may involve the placement of a catheter into a preexisting false passage, or more commonly, cre­ation of a false passage when an impassable urethral stricture is encoun­tered and forceful catheter advancement is attempted. Regardless, both conditions require urethroscopy and catheter placement by a urologist.
Ination of the catheter balloon in the urethra, most commonly the intraprostatic region of the male, is another potential means of injury. ese injuries result in passage of blood through the urethral meatus and likely hematuria. Management involves maintaining an indwelling urethral catheter and urologic follow-up for further diag­nosis and management.
Disease states such as inflammatory bowel disease and occa­sionally diverticulitis may involve the urethra. This involvement
D
occurs almost exclusively in men because of the presence of the vagina in women. The formation of a periurethral abscess is gen­erally treated by incision, drainage, and antibiotics. The scarring that may follow abscess resolution may lead to subacute urethral stricture formation, which is best addressed by urologic follow­up. Along with abscesses, urethroperineal or rectourethral fistulas can occur and require surgery. Very minor fistulae may resolve with urinary diversion via placement of a suprapubic tube through an anterior cystotomy. Otherwise, surgical excision of the fistula tract and layered closure of the urethra and perineal or rectal tis­sues with nonoverlapping suture lines is performed. Both abdomi­nal and perineal approaches have been described, with omental or gracilis muscle flaps used, respectively, to minimize the risk of fistula recurrence. A urethral catheter facilitates proper urethral healing, and diversion of both urinary and fecal output may be required. 
COMPLICATIONS 465
AB
CD
FIGURE 88-3 A, Creation of a Boari flap is initiated by outlining an anterior bladder flap. B, The bladder flap is raised. C, Closure of the bladder is
then started. D, Finally, the ureter is anastomosed to the upper end of the Boari flap.

REPRODUCTIVE STRUCTURES

Surgery involving the sigmoid colon and rectum can pose a risk to male reproductive structures. Because the prostate and seminal vesi­cles are closely related to the anterior rectum and the vasa deferentia converge upon this area, any procedures involving dissection here may risk injury to the structures. Similar to the ureter, the vas def­erens is a sensitive structure that may be aected by strictures with compression, skeletonization, or electrocautery injury. Interruption of its continuity will prohibit sperm from entering the ejaculate. Like­wise, injury or excision of the seminal vesicles will reduce semen vol­ume. Infertility that results from injury to either structure is unlikely
to be repairable but can be addressed with assisted reproductive tech­nology and scrotal procedures used to access the testes. 

NERVES

Injury to the pelvic nerves can result in urinary retention, as well as erectile dysfunction and ejaculatory failure in males. It also may produce pain or alter sensation in the groin and external genitalia. Acute urinary retention that develops aer surgery may result from anesthetic eects, narcotic medications, α-adrenergic agonists, anti­cholinergic medications, and bed rest. It is treated by placing an
Urologic issUes in colorectal sUrgery466
FIGURE 88-4 For an ileal ureter, a mobilized segment of ileum that is
sufficiently long to reach from the renal pelvis to the bladder is passed retroperitoneally through a window in the colonic mesentery. The anastomoses at each end are then completed.
indwelling urethral catheter, eliminating potential etiologic factors, and performing a voiding trial in a few days. If the voiding trial is not successful, it is repeated in a few days. However, if the problem is persistent, chronic urinary retention should be suspected. is con­dition generally results from injury to the pelvic nerve plexus and appears on urodynamic testing as detrusor areexia or a weak detru­sor contraction.
Chronic urinary retention is best managed by clean intermittent self-catheterization. Although most patients are opposed to this idea at rst, many soon welcome the practice because it eliminates the need for an indwelling urethral catheter and the discomfort caused by this catheter. Generally, patients are advised to self-catheterize every 4 to 6 hours to maintain a low-pressure bladder. Bacteriuria will develop in nearly all patients, regardless of whether catheteriza­tion is sterile, but this condition is usually asymptomatic and is not treated unless other symptoms of a urinary tract infection develop. Short-term antibiotic therapy tailored to urine cultures is provided if a urinary tract infection does arise.
Bladder dysfunction resulting from a neurologic injury is oen transient and thought to develop as a result of inammation and edema. Recovery of bladder function usually happens by 6 months; however, if dysfunction persists for a year, it is generally perma­nent. When voiding function returns, patients should be advised to record output times and volumes on a chart, as well as check a postvoid residual volume via self-catheterization and document this volume. Once residual volumes are consistently below 100 to 50 mL, self-catheterization may be discontinued. In males older than 40 years, bladder function may not return completely to nor­mal because of pre-existing bladder outlet obstruction from benign prostatic enlargement. In this situation, medical therapy is rst
pursued using an α-antagonist with or without the addition of a 5-α reductase inhibitor. Pending the success of this treatment, endo­scopic management of the prostate may be required.
Along with diculty voiding, injury to the pelvic autonomic nerves may result in erectile dysfunction, which is dened as the inability to obtain or maintain an erection satisfactory for coitus. Because colorectal surgery that would place the pelvic autonomic nerves at risk generally involves substantial disease, consideration of a psychogenic cause (such as anxiety or depression) for erectile dysfunction should not be dismissed. Obtaining a thorough sexual history may help delineate a cause, and specialized nocturnal tumes­cence studies may be indicated in some cases. Specically, pertinent details include whether erections occur, if they happen spontane­ously or nocturnally, and the duration and rigidity of the erection. e absence of nocturnal erections indicates a physiologic cause for the condition. A psychogenic basis for erectile dysfunction is best addressed with sex therapy provided by a certied counseling professional.
As with bladder dysfunction, erectile dysfunction may be tempo­rary, and the two conditions can coexist aer colorectal surgery. Aer 1 year, if erectile dysfunction persists, it is likely permanent. First­line treatment involves oral phosphodiesterase inhibitors, a number of which are available for prescription. If a trial of one inhibitor is unsuccessful, another may be evaluated. If lack of response to oral medications persists, intracavernosal injection therapy can be con­sidered if the patient wishes to pursue it. is therapy involves the injection of a single or mixed solution of vasoactive medications into the penis. It bypasses the nervous system and creates a usable erec­tion in patients with a healthy intact penile circulation. e medica­tions are titrated to produce an erection that lasts approximately 1 hour, and the injections generally result in little discomfort. However, injection therapy can result in priapism, hematoma formation, bro­sis, and penile curvature, as well as infection.
When pharmacologic treatment for erectile dysfunction fails, physical means of treatment can be pursued. A rst option to con­sider is a vacuum-assist erection device. ese devices are nonin­vasive and function by creating a vacuum in a cylindrical chamber sealed around the base of the penis that draws blood into the erectile tissue. Once the penis is erect within the chamber, a constrictive ring is placed at the base of the penis to prevent outow of this blood, which will oen produce semirigid tumescence that is suitable for coitus. Alternatively, an implantable penile prosthesis may be con­sidered. ese prostheses range from permanently semirigid hinged implants and exible malleable implants to an inatable penile pros­thesis that mimics the lling and expansion of the penile erectile bod­ies. All implants are placed into the corpora cavernosa and result in the permanent loss of the erectile tissue. erefore, penile prosthe­sis placement should be considered a nal option once the return of physiologic or pharmacologically induced erections has been ruled out. Most implants last for 10 years; mechanical device failure, infec­tion, and erosion are the major complications.
At times, ejaculatory failure may develop aer colorectal surgery. Aside from physical interruption of the seminal vesicles and vasa deferentia, damage to the lumbar sympathetic chain or hypogastric plexus can cause this condition. e pathophysiology may vary from absent bladder neck closure and retrograde ejaculation into the blad­der to the absence of seminal emission from lack of deposition into the prostatic urethra. As a result, infertility may occur, and some patients may be concerned about the lack of ejaculate. Retrograde ejaculation can be diagnosed by checking a postorgasm urine sample for sperm and fructose. Treatment with α-agonist medications an hour before sexual activity may restore antegrade ejaculation in some patients. Otherwise, in persons who wish to reproduce, sperm col­lected from the bladder aer retrograde ejaculation can be used with assistive reproductive technologies. An alternative option is to use scrotal procedures to access the testes.
Somatic innervation to the external genitalia and groin are pro­vided by the iliohypogastric, ilioinguinal, lateral femoral cutaneous,
COMPLICATIONS 467
and genitofemoral nerves. e course of these nerves relative to the retroperitoneal location of the ascending and descending colon should be known. Although they supply some muscle function to the cremaster and scrotum, these nerves are largely involved in groin and genital sensation. Transection, crush, stretch, or electrocautery injury to these nerves can result not only in absent or distorted sensation but also in the development of paresthesia or pain. 

BLOOD VESSELS

e gonadal veins and gonadal arteries course along the lateral retro­peritoneum with the ascending and descending colon and are at risk of injury during retroperitoneal surgery. Transection or ligation of these vessels should carry little risk, because the reproductive organs have a redundant blood supply with various collateral vessels. e risk of retroperitoneal hematoma should be recognized, however, because a high-pressure arterial hemorrhage may lead to ureteral
compression and obstruct urine ow. Otherwise, risk of vascular injury to other urologic structures is low because the blood supply to the bladder is richly redundant and the urethra, prostate, and exter­nal genitalia are also supported by collateral vessels in the pelvis. If care is taken to preserve the internal pudendal vessels, the vascular supply to the perineum and external genitalia will remain healthy.

S u g g e S t e d R e a d i n g S

Abboudi H, Ahmed K, Royle J, etal. Ureteric injury: a challenging condition
to diagnose and manage. Nat Rev Urol. 2013;10(2):108–115.
Eswara JR, Raup VT, Potretzke AM, etal. Outcomes of iatrogenic genitou-
rinary injuries during colorectal surgery. Urology. 2015;86(6):1228–1233.
Morey A, Zhao L. Genital and lower urinary tract trauma. In: Wein A, etal.,
eds. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2016:2389–
2392.
Santucci R, Chen M. Upper urinary tract trauma. In: Wein A, etal., eds.
Campbell-Walsh Urology. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2016:1148–1169.

P  T  C  L C S
Benjamin Crawshaw, Knut Magne Augestad, and Conor P. Delaney

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is complex and more technically demanding than many common laparoscopic procedures per­formed by general surgeons. Advanced laparoscopic skills are required to manipulate and mobilize sections of bowel, control and divide large mesenteric vessels, extract large specimens, and create an anastomosis. The degree of dissection performed can be extensive because of the broad attachments of the colon and rectum. The technical difficulty of these operations raises the like­lihood of complications, and the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery is well documented.
Complications can occur at any point during a laparoscopic operation, from the insertion of the rst trocar to its removal and the closing of all incisions. Although knowing how to identify and manage complications is important, anticipation and prevention is prudent. Broadly speaking, complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery can be categorized into two groups: those relating to lapa­roscopy in general, and those specic to intestinal operations. Gen­eral complications include those related to needle/trocar placement and removal, pneumoperitoneum, deep venous thrombosis, and use of electrocautery. Complications specic to colorectal laparos­copy include those related to patient positioning, bleeding, localiza­tion of tumors, contamination, anastomosis creation, and urologic injuries. 

GENERAL COMPLICATIONS

Contraindications
Although historically laparoscopy has been restricted to certain patients, currently the only absolute contraindication for its use is the inability of the patient to tolerate general anesthesia or a laparot­omy. Relative contraindications, such as previous abdominal surgery, pregnancy, morbid obesity, and pulmonary disease, can be limited through careful planning, surgical skill, and experience. Some sur­geons believe that the hand-assist laparoscopic technique is helpful. 
should be fully decompressed to reduce the risk of organ perforation during trocar placement.
Although we avoid its use under any circumstances, Veress needle use should at least be limited to patients without previous abdominal surgery, periumbilical inflammation, or hernias. Grip­ping and elevating the abdominal wall and dissection to identify the fascia during insertion may reduce the risk of injury to under­lying structures. Aspiration through the needle should always be performed after placement and prior to insufflation. The presence of blood or enteric content should immediately raise concern for injury and mandates immediate exploration for the site of injury. Initially this exploration may be performed using laparoscopy in a stable patient, but laparotomy is often warranted in the event that the extent of the injury cannot be evaluated or large vessels are involved.
e safest way to obtain initial peritoneal access is through an open technique using a Hassan trocar, which permits direct visual­ization and identication of underlying structures, although similar complications are still possible. Regardless of technique, aer initial trocar placement and insertion of the laparoscope, care should be taken to inspect the surrounding anatomy for injury prior to con­tinuing with the procedure.
Placement of secondary trocars should always be under direct visualization into an area clear of visceral structures. Transilluminat­ing the abdominal wall during secondary trocar placement, as well as positioning ports lateral to the rectus, can reduce injury to the infe­rior epigastric vessels. Suprapubic trocar placement carries the risk of bladder laceration, especially if the bladder is not fully decompressed, and theoretically can be identied by gaseous lling of the urine col­lection bag or bloody urine.
Minor complications of trocar placement include an air leak around the port, which may cause diculty in obtaining or maintain­ing pneumoperitoneum, and minor skin level bleeding at the inser­tion site. Tightening the skin around the port with sutures or towel clips can close air leaks, and skin-level bleeding is oen self-limiting or easily controlled with electrocautery. Incisional hernias at extrac­tion sites for colorectal surgeries are equivalent to those of any open procedure. Port site hernias are rare as long as the fascia at the site of trocars 10 mm or larger is closed. 
Peritoneal Access Complications
Obtaining access to the peritoneal cavity can be complicated in several ways. Injuries may occur during initial trocar placement or during placement of secondary trocars. Initial trocar placement is associated with injury to large intra-abdominal vascular structures and bowel perforation, whereas secondary trocar placement is associated with injury to intra-abdominal vessels—as well as those in the abdominal wall—and bowel and bladder perforation. e bladder and stomach
468
Pneumoperitoneum Complications
Improper Veress needle or trocar placement can cause subcutaneous or preperitoneal emphysema upon insuation. More rarely, pneu­mothorax, pneumomediastinum, or pneumopericardium may occur as well. Insuation should be immediately released with the occur­rence of any of these conditions. Subcutaneous emphysema is usually self-limited and resolves within hours postoperatively with minimal intervention. Patients with large amounts of subcutaneous carbon
COMPLICATIONS 469
dioxide may experience hypercarbia and acidosis, which should be treated with prolonged mechanical hyperventilation until the excess carbon dioxide can be cleared. Preperitoneal insuation also is not of great clinical signicance but may make proper access to the peri­toneal cavity dicult and may require moving trocars to a new site or conversion to laparotomy.
Gas embolism, although rare, is the most feared complication of pneumoperitoneum. is potentially fatal event occurs when a large amount of carbon dioxide is introduced to the venous circulation. e gas collects in the right heart and creates a vapor lock, causing a right outow obstruction that leads to sudden cardiovascular col­lapse. High suspicion for this complication should occur with any sudden drop in patient end-tidal carbon dioxide. Treatment includes immediate release of pneumoperitoneum, administration of 100% oxygen, and placement of the patient in Trendelenburg position with the le side down to allow blood to ow under the air bubble. e gas is then aspirated from the heart via a central venous catheter.
Other complications of pneumoperitoneum include arrhythmias/ vasovagal events and postoperative shoulder pain. Peritoneal disten­sion causes a reex vagal response, which may lead to signicant arrhythmias or bradycardia. Treatment includes release of pneumo­peritoneum and administration of an anticholinergic agent. When the arrhythmia has resolved, pneumoperitoneum may be slowly reintroduced. Recurrence of the arrhythmia may require conversion. Postoperative shoulder pain is caused by diaphragmatic irritation from retained carbon dioxide. Although it is very common, no treat­ment is required beyond attempting to prevent the occurrence by thoroughly evacuating all gas at the end of the procedure. 
Thromboembolic Complications
Postoperative deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are relatively uncommon aer laparoscopy because of earlier postop­erative mobilization. Prolonged reverse Trendelenburg positioning, as well as impaired venous return with intra-abdominal pressures greater than 15 mm Hg, may lead to venous stasis and risk of throm­boembolism. Intermittent use of pneumatic compression stockings and pre- and postoperative subcutaneous heparin should be used as prophylaxis in any patient undergoing major laparoscopic surgery unless otherwise contraindicated. 
Electrosurgical Complications
e use of electrocautery in laparoscopy raises the concern for inad­vertent thermal injury. Such injuries may occur outside of the eld of vision of the operator and can be dicult to identify.
e four major causes of electrosurgical injuries are inadvertent tissue contact, insulation failure, direct coupling, and capacitive cou­pling. Bipolar, monopolar, and ultrasonic tools generate signicant heat, which may cause thermal injury if the active tips make inad­vertent contact with a structure. is type of injury occurs when active instruments are not kept in view, as well as when introduc­ing or removing a potentially hot instrument tip. Insulation failure occurs when a break in insulation provides an alternate path for energy, leading to thermal injury to tissue adjacent to the instrument. Injury by direct coupling occurs when an active electrode makes contact with another conductive instrument. In capacitive coupling, the accumulation of electromagnetic current in conductors near the surgical eld, such as retractors or clamps, occasionally can generate enough energy to cause injury.
Electrosurgical complications are best prevented through care­ful and mindful control of instruments. e active tip of thermal devices should always be kept in the eld of view, and care should be taken when removing or repositioning these tools to avoid elec­trosurgical and mechanical injury. All instruments, especially reus­able tools, should be routinely inspected for insulation integrity.
Surgeons must be aware of warning signs of inadvertent current dis­charge, including a reduction in anticipated electrosurgical eect, electrostatic interference on the monitor, or involuntary abdominal muscle contraction.
ermal injury to the bowel is particularly worrisome because burns may progress to full-thickness injury and perforation if they are unrecognized. Small burns recognized at the time of the opera­tion are best treated with suture imbrication, whereas larger burns may require a segmental resection. Missed full-thickness injuries may present with peritonitis within hours or as intra-abdominal sep­sis days aer perforation occurs. 
SPECIFIC LAPAROSCOPIC COLORECTAL SURGERY COMPLICATIONS
Positioning Complications
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery oen employs extremes of patient positioning to allow visualization of the operative eld, as well as simultaneous abdominal and rectal access. Additionally, frequent adjustments to patient position are required during dierent steps of many procedures. It is thus imperative that the patient be safely and suciently secured to the operating table to prevent injury and slip­page. Care must be taken to pad and protect all exposed bony promi­nences, and a beanbag mattress or other protective measures should be used to immobilize the patient.
Nearly all laparoscopic colorectal procedures are performed with the patient in a modied lithotomy position. e prolonged time that a patient’s legs are placed in stirrups to allow for this position­ing raises the concern of nerve injury and “well-leg” compartment syndrome. Correct positioning of the patient, especially during pro­longed surgeries, is vital to the prevention of these injuries. Compres­sion of the common peroneal nerve is most common and occurs with inadequate padding along the lateral head of the bula. Postoperative neurologic symptoms relating to nerve compression oen resolve within 5 days but may be permanent. Compartment syndrome may occur when the patient is in the lithotomy position for more than 4 hours. Decreased venous return from pneumoperitoneum, along with direct pressure to the calf from improper positioning, may result in ischemic injury to the leg muscles, leading to edema and compart­ment syndrome in an otherwise healthy leg. Prompt recognition in the postoperative period is vital, because early treatment with a four­compartment fasciotomy is oen required. Adequate hydration and close monitoring for rhabdomyolysis is also necessary. is compli­cation has been noted more frequently with the prolonged operative times associated with robotic surgery. 
Bleeding Complications
One of the most common complications in laparoscopic intestinal surgery is bleeding. As previously discussed, the most common vascular injuries encountered during trocar placement are to large abdominal vessels (i.e., the aorta, inferior vena cava, and iliac ves­sels) and the inferior epigastric vessels. Injury to a large vessel may be catastrophic. Direct pressure and/or packing at the site, a prompt laparotomy, and involvement of a vascular surgeon are advised. In the event of instrument puncture of a large vessel, it is best to leave the instrument in place rather than remove it, because the instru­ment may provide some degree of tamponade, and removal could cause rapid hemorrhage. Bleeding from the inferior epigastric ves­sels may be controlled through cautery, tamponade with the trocar or a Foley catheter, or transabdominal gure-of-eight suture ligation. Care must be taken to control the vessel both proximal and distal to the injury.
Prevention and treatment of ComPliCations of laParosCoPiC ColoreCtal surgery470
Intraoperatively, the most important source of hemorrhage comes from the mesenteric vessels. Great care must be taken during the identication and control of these vessels to prevent accidental dam­age and ensure adequate control. Once they are carefully isolated and skeletonized, several methods are used to divide the vessels, includ­ing clips, vascular staplers, bipolar cautery, and the harmonic scalpel. Occasionally, a pre-tied surgical ligature is placed around the mes­enteric stump for added security. Should bleeding occur from a cut vessel end, attempts should be made to isolate and clamp the stump, followed by application of a clip or pre-tied ligature. Blind clipping is not advised because it may injure surrounding structures. If the operative eld is obscured with blood, direct pressure to the area and thorough irrigation with a 1-cm aspirator tip may facilitate laparo­scopic eorts. If the vessel cannot be identied or controlled, conver­sion to a hand-assist or open approach is warranted.
Some portions of certain procedures are more prone to bleeding complications than are others. e loss of tactile feedback in lapa­roscopy may lead to excessive traction on the spleen and its connec­tions during splenic exure manipulation and mobilization, leading to lacerations to the splenic capsule or the vessels in the ileocolic ligament. Use of the reverse Trendelenburg position during splenic exure mobilization, as well as minimizing the tension placed on the spleen, can prevent these injuries. Capsule tears oen can be con­trolled with spray thrombin or similar topical hemostatic agents. A massive hemorrhage may require a laparotomy and/or splenectomy. Similarly, bleeding from the presacral and pelvic vessels can com­plicate pelvic dissection. Careful dissection in the appropriate ana­tomic plane, although not always feasible, is the best prevention for this type of bleeding. If bleeding occurs in this area, manual pressure and packing may provide hemostasis. If bleeding continues, a muscle patch may be utilized.
Close inspection for hemostasis is vital at the completion of lapa­roscopic surgery. Massive postoperative hemorrhage is most oen the result of an inadequately secured mesenteric vessel and requires exploration and repair. Smaller scale bleeding is oen venous. e pressure of pneumoperitoneum may be enough to tamponade small veins during surgery, and thus vessels that appeared hemostatic on inspection may bleed when the intra-abdominal pressure is released. Close observation of these patients is reasonable, as long as they are hemodynamically stable, because much of this type of bleeding is controlled by the patient’s normal hemostatic mechanisms. Use of nonsteroidal antiinammatory drugs and other antiplatelet or anti­coagulation agents in the immediate postoperative period may inter­fere in this process and prolong bleeding. In the stable patient with ongoing concern for bleeding, initial exploration may be performed with a laparoscope; however, a denitive source may not be found, and a laparotomy may be required. 
Tumor Identification Difficulties
e identication and localization of an intraluminal or hepatic mass may be dicult because of the lack of tactile feedback and the inability to manually palpate the specimen prior to resection. is phenome­non may be minimized with careful preoperative planning, includ­ing use of contrast enemas and computed tomography (CT) scans to thoroughly document the tumor location. Injection of India ink at the time of colonoscopy can clearly identify the location but may not prove useful if it is unable to be visualized during laparoscopy. Sometimes the needle penetrates the bowel wall and ink is dispersed throughout the peritoneal cavity. If an intraluminal mass cannot be accurately identied, intraoperative colonoscopy may be performed. Alternatively, conversion to a hand-assist approach permits manual palpation of the bowel. Once removed, the specimen should always be opened and examined away from the operative eld to conrm the presence of the tumor and the resection margins. Hepatic metastases also may be missed with routine laparoscopy for similar reasons. Pre­operative CT scans are useful for liver evaluation, and laparoscopic
ultrasound is now routinely used for staging of hepatic lesions at the time of primary colon resection. 
Contamination
Peritoneal and wound contamination can occur with enteric bac­teria and tumor cells, leading to surgical site infections and tumor implantation. Infectious contamination can be prevented in several ways. Preoperative mechanical and antibiotic bowel preparation should be used if no bowel obstruction is present. Rectal irrigation with a Betadine solution should be performed aer the induction of anesthesia if a rectal anastomosis is planned. Bowel manipulation should be minimized as much as possible and atraumatic graspers should be used to minimize the potential for accidental perforation. When it is necessary to retract a piece of bowel, a closed grasp­ing clamp should be used, and whenever possible, the manipulated bowel should be within the planned resection. During specimen extraction, the incision should be protected with plastic drapes or a commercial wound protector. Instruments and gloves used in the creation of the anastomosis or that have otherwise come into con­tact with enteric contents should be removed from the operative eld and replaced with clean versions. Extracorporeal resection and anastomosis may have a lower risk of contamination than a totally intracorporeal technique; however, the latter may be safely per­formed by an experienced surgeon.
Implantation of malignant cells in a surgical incision at the time of resection is rare. Despite initial concerns and reports of increased implantation of malignant cells at trocar sites, several studies have shown no increase in tumor recurrence in laparoscopic versus open cases. Manipulation of the tumor during the operation should be minimized to prevent violation of the specimen and dissemination of tumor cells through the peritoneum. Plastic drapes or commercial wound protectors should be used to protect extraction incisions, and laparoscopic extraction bags should be used if intracorporeal resec­tion and anastomosis is performed. 
Anastomosis Complications
When creating a colorectal anastomosis, care must be taken to pre­vent torsion of the bowel limbs. is endeavor may be more dif­cult in a laparoscopic resection with extracorporeal anastomosis because the bowel is removed from its normal anatomic position and may be twisted accidentally as it is extracted from the abdo­men. Careful attention to the orientation of the limb will prevent accidental torsion, leading to early bowel obstruction. Care must be taken not to let the ends of the bowel inadvertently rotate aer specimen extraction and division, and in procedures such as an extended right colectomy, particular care needs to be taken to avoid making a 360-degree twist in the mesentery. Laparoscopic low rec­tal transection may be dicult because of the technical challenges of stapling, especially in obese patients and those with a very nar­row pelvis. Rectal division usually requires two rings of the stapler. Positioning the stapler low enough on the rectum in the correct ori­entation may be challenging because of the 45-degree angulation limit of laparoscopic staplers. Drawing the rectum to the le opens the angle on the right and facilitates stapler positioning. External pressure on the perineum may help li the pelvic oor enough to allow the stapler to be placed low enough. Alternatively, placement of a suprapubic port may permit improved stapler placement. If these attempts fail to allow for appropriate placement, a conversion may be necessary with creation of a short Pfannenstiel incision, thus allowing use of a 30-mm linear stapler, or for lower tumors a transanal intersphincteric dissection with hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis can be used. Other anastomotic complications are not specic to laparoscopic technique but may occur, including a sta­pler misre, staple line bleeding, and an anastomotic leak.