Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_927_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
31 Мб
Скачать
ANAL AND PERIANAL REGION 31
BOX 6-1: Specific Areas of Focus During History Taking
• Symptoms(e.g.,gas,stool,anddrainageofpurulentuidfrom
the vagina)
• Dyspareunia/perinealpain • Recurrenturinarytractinfections • Bowelhabits • Pastpelvicandanalsurgery(includingobstetricalhistoryand
any prior pelvic irradiation)
• Chronicdiseasesandmedicationsthataectbowelhabits
BOX 6-2: Outline of Treatment Options
Medical
Control diarrhea Treat Crohn disease when present 
Nonsurgical Closure
Fistula plug 
Surgical Closure
Anal Approach
Rectal advancement ap Advancement sleeve ap (may also include a transabdominal ap-
proach along with the transanal approach; if the transabdomi­nal approach is used, the patient may need a delayed coloanal anastomosis [Turnbull-Cutait procedure]) 
Transvaginal Approach
Vaginal ap 
Perineal Approach
Ligation of the intersphincteric stula tract Episioproctotomy Interposition of tissue
+ Gracilis muscle + Martius ap
Surgery may not be the best option for women with a small inter­nal opening and minimal symptoms. It is important to remember that surgery could make the situation and symptoms worse, as well as create additional scarring. If Crohn disease is present, it should be treated or managed surgically before embarking on a surgical course to close the stula. Additionally, diarrhea should be under optimal control. Occasionally a diverting stoma (typically an ileos­tomy) is required for the tissue to become supple enough to per­form a repair, particularly when the stula is related to radiation. Hyperbaric oxygen treatment may improve radiated or scarred tis­sue to a sucient degree to permit a repair to be attempted. Use of a vaginal hormone cream for a month before performing a repair also may improve the elasticity of tissues in postmenopausal women. 
larger outweigh the symptoms. Some methods of treating diarrhea include titration of insoluble ber and loperamide. Biopsy nd­ings that are positive for collagenous or microcytic colitis warrant appropriate medical treatment, which is outside of the scope of this chapter.
Medical treatment, including antibiotics and biologic therapy for an RVF related to Crohn disease, will sometimes lead to closure of the stula. More commonly, the stula is situated at the base of an ulcer. Medical treatment may change the quality of the anal canal from an inamed ulcer to a dry scar, which in turn may permit closure to be considered. 
Nonsurgical Closure
Fistula Plug
Failure of a stula plug carries minimal risk. Dislodgement of the plug can be an early cause of failure, and thus when a plug is used to treat an RVF, it is modied through the addition of a button that is sewn into the mucosa and submucosa on the anal side. is button stabilizes the plug to reduce chances of dislodgement. A short or epi­thelialized tract is not ideal for a plug closure. In the operating room, the tract is lightly debrided with gauze or a brush and then ushed with hydrogen peroxide. e size of the plug is chosen based on the stula size, and the plug is prepared according to the manufacturer’s specications. e tapered end of the plug is pulled from the anal side to the vaginal side so that the button rests against the anorectal wall. e plug is stabilized with a 2-0 polyglycolic acid suture placed deeply through the anal tissue, the plug, and the button holes. e button should remain at against the rectoanal wall aer the sutures are placed. Excess plug material is trimmed from the vaginal side. Adequate space between the plug and the external opening is nec­essary to allow for drainage. Postoperatively, for about 4 weeks, the patient is advised to avoid strenuous activity and liing more than 20 pounds. Additionally, sexual intercourse, baths, swimming, and soaking of the anal area are to be avoided for 4 weeks, although show­ers are permitted. Aer defecation, wet toilet paper can be used, but use of wipes containing chemicals should be avoided. Drainage and spotting of blood are expected, but upon detection of anything more extensive, patients are advised to call their doctor. Mineral oil or other stool soeners are used to prevent patients from straining to defecate. Use of antibiotics is controversial; however, in my unit we prescribe oral ciprooxacin for 7 days and application of metronidazole cream to the external opening twice daily for 7 days. 
Fibrin Glue
Instillation of brin glue into the tract has been described to close an anal stula. is option typically is not favored because RVF tracts are usually short and, overall, results are dismal when brin glue is used with any type of anal stula. However, the risks of this treatment are low. Use of brin glue under a ap repair has also been entertained, but few positive data regarding this approach have been reported. 

TREATMENT OPTIONS

Options for treatment (Box 6-2) are classied as medical, nonsurgical closure, or surgical closure. e route for closure is accomplished via the vagina, perineum, anus, or abdomen or through a combination of these approaches.
Medical
For some patients, management of diarrhea will improve the situ­ation to the extent that the risks of surgery and of making the hole
Surgical Closure
Anal Approach
Rectal Advancement Flap
e integrity of the anal sphincter is probably one of the most impor­tant aspects to consider when contemplating the choice of surgical repair. If the sphincter is intact and the stula is above the dentate line, an advancement rectal ap procedure can be peformed. Although this repair can be performed in any position, the prone jackknife
Rectovaginal Fistula32
position provides optimal exposure. I prefer full bowel preparation, use of intravenous (IV) antibiotics, and having a Foley catheter in place during the procedure. Unless the tract is completely dry and epithelialized, I also prefer that a draining seton be in place for a month prior to closure, which facilitates elimination of any sepsis or entrapped uid in the tract and improves the pliability of the tissues.
e ap starts a few millimeters distal to the internal opening, and the arc for the ap is about 180 degrees. e anal canal mucosa is carefully removed, avoiding injury to the internal anal sphincter. e ap then becomes full thickness of rectum cephalad to the anal sphincter complex. Mobilization of the rectum from the rectovagi­nal septum continues until the distal end can be advanced without tension to the opposite cut edge on the distal anal canal. e stula is cored out and closed in layers with gure-of-8, 3-0 polyglycolic acid sutures. e internal opening is closed from the anal side only. e use of a UR 5–type needle facilitates the ability to obtain a deep suture in the conned space of the anal canal to close the opening. Usually the closure is performed from cephalad to caudad in several layers using gure-of-8 sutures. e vaginal or perineal side will be le open, and sometimes the external opening is enlarged to ensure adequate drainage. e distal tip of the ap, which includes the area of the internal opening, is trimmed. e goal is to advance full-thick­ness rectum distally. To reduce tension at the suture line, one or two simple sutures may be incorporated beneath the ap. One bite (not full thickness) is placed through the tissue on the undersurface and the other is placed through the distal cut edge in the anal canal. en, aer ensuring hemostasis, the ap is advanced to the distal cut edge and sewn in place with 3-0 polyglycolic acid sutures. e middle sutures are placed rst with deep, simple, full-thickness bites. Sewing is then carried laterally on each side to complete the suture line. Some variations in ap construction include short bursts of running suture to close the two edges, minimal mobilization of the ap with more of a layered closure, and orientation of the ap longitudinally (instead of the semicircle).
Postoperatively, in patients without a diverting stoma, restrict­ing oral intake for 2 to 3 days may delay passage of stool over the fresh sutures. e perineal area is examined on postoperative day 1 to assess for swelling and bruising. If signicant swelling or bruising is present, a delay in the removal of the Foley catheter until postop­erative day 2 is considered. Although preoperative administration of antibiotics is universal, considerable variation exists regarding the postoperative use of antibiotics, from none to 7 days. I favor administration of IV antibiotics while the patient is in the hospital and then completion of a total 5- to 7-day course of oral antibiotics. ere is also no consensus regarding activity limitations. Although some surgeons curtail activity and prescribe bed rest for postop­erative days 1 to 2 in order to avoid pulling on the suture line, I allow patients to be out of bed but ask them to avoid sitting as much as possible. No scientic evidence exists for any of these activity restrictions.
Care aer hospital discharge sometimes can be more important than the postoperative care provided in the hospital in facilitating success. Patients are encouraged to walk and go up steps but to li no more than the weight of a gallon of milk. ey can sit on a pil­low but not on a doughnut, which spreads the buttocks and pulls on the perineal skin. If they do not have a proximal stoma, I ask them to ingest an ounce of mineral oil daily along with insoluble ber. While they are in the hospital, I do not allow them to eat until the day of discharge. On the day of their discharge they are given a solid diet, their rst dose of mineral oil, and the oral antibiotic. If they do not have a stool by 2 to 3 days aer discharge from the hospital, I ask them to ingest an ounce of milk of magnesia daily until they have a bowel movement. Patients are in regular phone contact with my nurse to ensure that constipation is avoided. I also allow patients to take showers but instruct them to avoid taking baths for 2 to 3 weeks because a bath seems to make the anal skin waterlogged.
e nurse continues to be in regular phone contact with the patient, and any concerns regarding pain or pressure are immediately addressed, usually at an oce visit. At times, performing an examina­tion with use of an anesthetic is necessary to investigate the source of the pain and verify the absence of trapped uid. On several occasions, making a counter incision to allow drainage lateral to the ap has prevented the ap from being lied o when patients presented with new pain or pressure.
Successful closure of an RVF with a rectal advancement ap can be expected in about 65% of women. Smoking and Crohn disease have been associated with failure of this procedure. 
Advancement Sleeve Flap
In some women, signicant scarring in the anal canal or anal canal stenosis precludes use of an advancement rectal ap. In these situa­tions, use of an advancement sleeve ap is considered. e periopera­tive preparation is the same as for the advancement rectal ap. e procedure diers in that a full circle of anal canal mucosa is excised, starting anteriorly a few millimeters distal to the internal opening. e incisional line for the posterior half of the sleeve is the dentate line. e mucosectomy is continued cephalad to the top of the anal sphincter; the dissection is then carried laterally so that a full thick­ness of rectum is mobilized. e plane that is entered is the same one utilized when performing an Altemeier procedure (i.e., a peri­neal proctosigmoidectomy). However, when performing the Alte­meier procedure, the plane is typically a little more redundant and stretched out from the prolapse. Mobilization continues cephalad until the sleeve will advance to the neodentate line without tension. Closure of the internal opening is performed in the same manner as for the rectal advancement ap. Because of the possibility that uid may become trapped beneath the ap, I insert a 10-mm drain that lies beneath the ap, comes out the buttock laterally (inserted using a trocar), and connects to a red-top test tube or bulb to exert negative pressure. I am amazed at the amount of serous uid that is collected during the rst 2 to 3 days—sometimes as much as 20 mL daily. I remove the drain when the output is about 5 mL in a 24-hour period. e anterior proximal edge of the ap is trimmed and the ap is advanced down and sewn to the neodentate line as outlined for the advancement rectal ap. Because mobilization for a sleeve ap is more extensive, a diverting stoma is typically placed. Otherwise, the postoperative care is the same as that previously outlined for the advancement rectal ap.
A sleeve is useful in persons with Crohn disease because sig­nicant anal canal scarring and tissue xation may be present. e mucosectomy removes the scarred anal canal tissue, and provided the rectum has little to no inammation, healthy tissue can be brought into the area. e success rate of the sleeve is about 65%, with similar results for Crohn and non-Crohn etiologies.
In some cases the circumferential rectal ap will not reach the neodentate line. When this situation is encountered, the patient will need to be turned onto her back and placed in stirrups, and an abdominal approach is added to gain sucient length. is proce­dure entails mobilizing the rectum circumferentially. I try to avoid dividing the inferior mesentery artery and vein until I am sure it is needed for sucient mobilization and reach. However, I do not hesitate to divide the artery and vein or mobilize the splenic ex­ure to augment length and avoid tension on the anastomosis. When the abdominal approach is added, an ileostomy is almost always performed. 
Turnbull-Cutait Anastomosis
A Turnbull-Cutait staged colo-anal anastomosis, which is a varia­tion of the abdominal mobilization of the rectum, may improve chances of successful closure of the stula. e dierence is that maturation of the anastomosis is delayed for 5 to 7 days as opposed
ANAL AND PERIANAL REGION 33
to suturing it at the initial operation. is approach allows two raw surfaces to seal before sutures are placed through the bowel. is approach may be favored when the internal os will be close to the suture line.
Aer the mucosectomy, abdominal rectal mobilization, and closure of internal os are performed, eight sutures of 3-0 polyg­lycolic acid are placed in the cardinal positions around the anus. ese sutures are placed with deep bites from the outside of the anoderm to the inside of the raw cut surface and pinned out radi­ally to avoid tangling. e healthy bleeding cut edge of the distal bowel (usually rectum) is then brought out the anus and posi­tioned so the bowel is extruded 5 to 10 cm from the anal verge. e bowel is wrapped with petroleum jelly (e.g., Vaseline)-impregnated gauze. Next, the sutures are unpinned and wrapped around the (now Vaseline covered) extruded bowel, and all is held in place via wrapping with Kerlix gauze, which is stabilized with clips or simple sutures. When this approach is used, an ileostomy is always performed.
e patient recovers on the nursing oor and is able to walk and sit. e only caveat is that most women retain their Foley catheter until aer stage 2. Aer 5 to 7 days, the patient is returned to the operating room and placed in the lithotomy position, the gauze is carefully unwrapped, and the sutures are pinned out radially around the anus. By this time the serosa of the bowel has adhered to the raw surface created in the anal canal. Great care is taken to avoid disrupt­ing this attachment. e bowel is amputated at least 1 cm distal to the anal opening, and the sutures are placed through the cut edge of the bowel and tied. I prefer to add short bursts of running suture to further stabilize and seal the anastomosis. When the anastomosis is completed, a small amount of ectropion exists that typically will retract into the anal canal within 6 months. Amputating the bowel more proximally increases the risk of disrupting the seal between the bowel and the anal canal.
Before closing the stoma, I routinely examine the anesthetized patient to ensure the stula is closed and everything has healed. 
Transvaginal Approach
When the transvaginal approach is used, with the patient in the lithotomy position, the posterior vaginal mucosa is mobilized start­ing distal to the stula opening and extending several centimeters proximally. Although most reports indicate that a semicircular vaginal ap is utilized, some surgeons use a linear ap. e tract is excised and closed in layers with 3-0 absorbable suture. Some reports emphasize the use of several layers of pursestring sutures for closure, whereas other reports indicate that closure is performed with gure­of-8 sutures. Care is taken to avoid shortening the vagina or creating an uneven surface along the posterior vaginal wall because each con­sequence can contribute to dyspareunia.
One reported advantage of this approach in persons with Crohn disease, especially if some element of inammation is present, is that the anal area is undisturbed. 
Perineal Approach
Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula Tract
If the tract is in the upper anal sphincter region, then a ligation of the intersphincteric stula tract can be performed. is technique does not divide any anal muscle, and data are accumulating regard­ing the results for closure with this approach. (A more detailed description of this approach for non-RVF anal stula can be found in Chapter 5). 
Episioproctotomy
When a woman who had a previous vaginal delivery has an anterior sphincter defect (no matter the cause of the RVF), an episioproctotomy
is recommended. It is important to remember that the patient can have a wide intact perineal body but a weak, decient, or scarred sphincter. erefore, unless the sphincter is clearly defective, an anal ultrasound is invaluable in detecting an anal sphincter defect.
e preparation is the same as for the advancement rectal ap. With the patient in the prone position, a probe is placed through the stula tract and an incision is made over the probe. Sometimes the length of skin that will be divided is daunting, but remembering that no or minimal muscle will be divided is key. e muscle ends are dis­sected out and the internal and external sphincter muscles that have been joined by scarring are le in place. Some dissection is required in the rectovaginal septum to debride the epithelialized stula tract and allow the sphincter repair space to lie at aer sutures are tied. e sphincter is totally debrided, and hemostasis is ensured. Crossing the sphincter over in a vest-over-pants type fashion (i.e., le over right versus right over le) will allow visualization of the optimal setup for repair. e goals are for the overlapped muscle repair to lie at and as much dead space as possible to be obliterated. Aer determination of the optimal overlap, attention is turned to the rectal mucosa, which is closed rst. Starting at the cephalad aspect, far-far-near-near 2-0 or 3-0 polyglycolic acid sutures are placed in the rectal mucosa. e aim is precise approximation of the mucosa. ese sutures are placed until about the level of the dentate line and tied down. It is impor­tant to place these sutures rst because visualization will be decreased aer the muscle overlap, making precise placement impossible. Next, using 2-0 polydioxanone sutures, a vest-over-pants type repair is per­formed to overlap the muscle; then the free edge of muscle from the overlap can be tacked down with 2-0 polydioxanone suture. e rec­tal mucosa is then closed to the level of the perineal skin, stopping at about the anal verge. Next, the apex of the vaginal defect is closed with mattress sutures of 2-0 polyglycolic acid. Depending on the amount of dead space, I will loosely approximate the vaginal closure, because if uid has accumulated, I want it to drain out the vaginal side rather than the anal side. Care is taken to line up the hymenal ring during the vaginal closure. e perineal skin from the introitus to the anal verge is also usually (but not always, depending on the amount of dead space) le open for drainage.
Postoperative care is similar to that for the rectal sleeve ap. is approach does not require a diverting stoma, although if the repair is a repeat procedure or if it is unusually complex, use of a stoma may be considered. Careful postoperative monitoring is key to improv­ing success. Any reports of pressure or increased pain or concerns about uid accumulation require an examination aer induction of anesthesia to drain trapped uid and prevent it from coming out the anorectal suture line. On many occasions, a local physician has prescribed antibiotics for these symptoms, and when I nally see the patient, she will report that uid or drainage came from the anus, which relieved her symptoms but was associated with recurrent RVF symptoms. Preventing drainage of this uid from the anorectal suture line may help avoid a recurrence.
If a stoma has been placed, about 2 to 3 months later I examine the anesthetized patient prior to closing the stoma. Any granulation tis­sue found along any suture line raises suspicion for a persistent stula and mandates a very careful examination.
With this approach, closure of the stula has been reported in nearly 80% of cases when the cause was obstetrical or cryptoglandular.
Tissue Interposition
. Placement of muscle (typically the gracilis) between the
Gracilis
rectum and vagina via a transperineal approach is an option when the patient has a lot of scarring in the anal canal and the goal is to bring in healthy tissue with a good blood supply. For this procedure I team up with a plastic surgeon, who mobilizes the gracilis. I prefer that the patient be positioned in the prone jackknife position to al­low precise dissection in the rectovaginal plane. e plastic surgeons I have worked with have adapted and can mobilize the muscle in the prone position, but I ensure they are present for the positioning,
Rectovaginal Fistula34
prepping, and draping. One must be sure the tunnel from the leg to the space in the rectovaginal septum is wide and does not impinge on the muscle or its blood supply. In the rectovaginal septal mobi­lization, a wide transverse incision is made over the perineal body between the anus and vagina. is mobilization is carried at least 2 to 3 cm cephalad to the stula tract. e anal and vaginal openings are closed from inside the rectovaginal septum with 2-0 or 3-0 polyg­lycolic acid mattress sutures. Sutures are next placed cephalad to the opening on the rectal side but are not tied, usually at each corner of the space that results from the transverse mobilization. en the gra­cilis muscle is brought through the groin tunnel and oriented so the at surface of the muscle lies at against the rectum and the previ­ously placed sutures are brought through the muscle and tied. Other sutures are placed around the repaired rectal hole and tied down, always maintaining a at surface of the muscle that is sitting against the rectum. If the muscle has a lot of bulk, the remaining muscle is secured with sutures. e perineal skin may be le open or loosely approximated with absorbable sutures. Because it is important to prevent uid accumulation, a Penrose drain is positioned along the muscle on the vaginal side to promote uid drainage. A stoma is al­most always used.
Postoperative care and restrictions are usually dictated by the leg incision (i.e., they are determined by the plastic surgeon). ere is usually a drain in the donor muscle bed along the medial surface of the thigh. Typically, the patient is instructed to avoid liing and strenuous activity for 4 weeks. Showers are permitted, but baths and swimming should be avoided until granulation tissue forms over and seals all suture lines.
Gracilis interposition is typically reserved for cases in which mul­tiple previous attempts to repair the stula have failed and for stulas that are radiation induced or related to cancer excision. Success rates of 60% to 75% have been reported. 
Martius
healthy tissue into the area. e patient is usually in the lithotomy po­sition during the procedure. A vertical incision is made over the labia majora to expose the bulbocavernosus fat pad beneath. Mobilization begins from the lateral aspect of each side of the incision working medially. e fat pad is mobilized o the fascia covering the urogeni­tal diaphragm posteriorly and the labia minora and bulbocavernosus muscle medially. e lateral blood supply is sacriced. Aer the tube of fatty tissue is circularly mobilized, dissection is carried cephalad and superiorly (away from the perineum), and the vessels and blood supply are divided. Hence the blood supply for this brofatty ap is from the perineal branches of the internal pudendal artery that remains attached at the most inferior aspect. A generous tunnel is made in the subcutaneous tissue to carefully deliver the bulky fat pad into the wound. Orientation must be assessed to ensure it is not twisted, which could reduce blood ow and lead to ischemia. e Martius gra can be used to augment a sphincter overlap, or in place of the gracilis, and is placed in the rectovaginal septum to separate the anorectal and vaginal openings. A Penrose drain is placed in the labia, and the area of the donor site is closed in layers with absorb­able sutures. e labial skin is then closed. Optimally when using this approach, the bulk of the fat pad will reach to completely cover the repaired opening. However, this can be a limitation because some women have small, thin labial fat pads. e skin over the perineal area is closed as described for the gracilis interposition. 
. e Martius ap is another procedure that brings

SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS

Use of a Stoma
In some cases a stoma is necessary for symptom control and is retained until a repair has been performed successfully. In other patients, a stoma is performed to protect a repaired area, although the use of a diverting stoma does not guarantee success. It is always considered, especially for repeat repairs, and the patient is nearly always warned of this possibility and undergoes preoperative mark­ing. Other indications for a stoma include a technically dicult pro­cedure or an advanced procedure (such as a sleeve, Turnbull-Cutait anastomosis, or gracilis interposition). 
Postoperative Care
Lack of attention to details in postoperative care can lead to failure of the repair. For patients without a stoma, the passage of a hard or dicult stool can sabotage a repair. erefore, close communication with the patient is necessary. In addition, any reports of increased or new pain or pressure should be investigated because sometimes they signal trapped uid, and evacuation in the operating room without allowing this uid to drain out of the anal region will be the dierence between recurrence and success. 
Sexual Function/Vaginal Dryness
Dyspareunia aer repair of an RVF is not uncommon. Sutures that nar­row the vagina to less than two nger breaths or leave a rough, humped surface on the rectal side can increase the chances of painful intercourse. Some women naturally are afraid that intercourse will be painful and thus lubrication during arousal is insucient. Counseling about when they can resume sexual intercourse (aer the area is healed, which can take up to 3 months) can reduce some of these problems. Liberal use of water-soluble lubrication during the rst attempts at intercourse and avoiding the missionary position in favor of the woman being on top to control the degree of penetration are useful tips. If problems persist, then advanced counseling from an expert is warranted. 
Recurrence
Persistence or recurrence of the stula can be emotionally devastat­ing. When the stula persists or recurs, starting over with a review of the operative note and examination of the entire area (almost starting from scratch) is necessary. An examination aer induction of anesthesia is considered to obtain a full picture of the trajectory of the tract because it may have changed. Placement of a stoma is more strongly considered, along with use of an advanced type of repair as the next surgical interven­tion. A repeat repair should not be attempted until the tissue is so and pliable, and thus placement of a draining seton for sepsis drainage should be considered. One should avoid performing multiple advancement ap repairs in succession, which usually leads to unusable scar tissue and lim­its further choices. Referral to a specialty center may be a better choice. 
Biologic Mesh
of the openings at the anal and vaginal side, followed by placement of a biologic material, has been reported. Loose or no approximation of the perineal skin at closure is recommended because signicant drainage occurs that can last for several weeks. Although some sur­geons are enthusiastic about this procedure, I have not embraced it because aerward the tissue takes on a cardboard-like nature, and if the procedure fails, any further repair is then hampered by the inex­ibility of the tissue. 
. Dissection in the rectovaginal plane and closure

CONCLUSION

Because RVFs present special challenges, a careful history and physi­cal evaluation are required to determine the correct treatment plan. It is important to remember that not all patients require surgical treatment; the risks and benets must be weighed. Surgical therapy is customized, which means the surgeon must be familiar with dif­ferent techniques of repair. An algorithm to consider when planning surgical therapy is provided in Figure 6-1.
ANAL AND PERIANAL REGION 35
History and physical examination Possible examination under anesthesia Possible anal ultrasound Soft tissue, sepsis controlled
Sphincter intact
Good tissue
Good tissue
Minimal scarring
Minimal scarring
Rectal advancement flap
FIGURE 6-1 Algorithm for repair of a rectovaginal fistula.
Loss of tissue Scarred Recurrent RVF
Sleeve advancement Transanal Be ready for transabdominal
mobilization if needed
Abdominal approach with internal os very close to suture line Turnbull-Cutait

S u g g e S t e d R e a d i n g

El-Gazzaz G, Hull T, Mignanelli E, etal. Analysis of function and predictors of
failure in women undergoing repair of Crohn’s related rectovaginal stula. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;5:824–829.
El-Gazzaz G, Hull TL, Mignanelli E, etal. Obstetric and cryptoglandular rec-
tovaginal stulas: long-term surgical outcome; quality of life; and sexual function. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;11:1758–1763.
Hull TL, ed. Posterior Pelvic Floor Abnormalities. Philadelphia: Elsevier/Saun-
ders; 2011.
Hull TL, El-Gazzaz G, Gurland B, etal. Surgeons should not hesitate to per-
form episioproctotomy for rectovaginal stula secondary to cryptoglan­dular or obstetrical origin. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;1:54–59.
Sphincter defect
Episioproctotomy
Severe scarring Several recurrences Fistula in mid or distal
rectum
Tissue interposition
Lefevre JH, Bretagnol F, Maggiori L, etal. Operative results and quality of life
aer gracilis muscle transposition for recurrent rectovaginal stula. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;7:1290–1295.
Marchesa P, Hull TL, Fazio VW. Advancement sleeve aps for treatment of
severe perianal Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg. 1998;12:1695–1698.
Pinto RA, Peterson TV, Shawki S, etal. Are there predictors of outcome fol-
lowing rectovaginal stula repair? Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;9:1240–1247.
Schouten WR, Oom DM. Rectal sleeve advancement for the treatment of per-
sistent rectovaginal stulas. Tech Coloproctol. 2009;4:289–294.
Tro j a A, Kase P, El-Sourani N, et al. Treatment of recurrent rectovaginal/
pouch-vaginal stulas by gracilis muscle transposition—a single center experience. J Visc Surg. 2013;6:379–382.
P S
Tim Slack, Graham Newstead, and Mark Muhlmann

ETIOLOGY

Pilonidal disease is a common infection that occurs around hair­containing sinuses in the natal cle. It usually presents in young men, and if it is not managed correctly, it tends to persist or recur. e dis­ease and its treatments are a signicant burden on patients, caregiv­ers, and society, oen resulting in signicant loss of time from work with persistent symptoms, a continuing need for wound care, and frequent trips to health care providers for follow-up.
In 1833, Herbert Mayo rst described a hair-containing sinus in the natal cle. Initially thought to be congenital in origin, pilonidal sinus dis­ease is now widely accepted to be an acquired condition that originates when healthy hair penetrates the skin through either a preformed sinus/ hair follicle or by creating new sinuses. Subsequently, foreign body reac­tion, epithelialization of tracts, and chronic infection become the hall­marks of disease, leading either to chronic sinuses or recurring abscesses.
Loose hair, frictional force, and vulnerable skin are the main fac­tors that lead to hair insertion and sinus formation. Contributing risk factors are hirsutism, obesity (a deep natal cle), a sedentary lifestyle or occupation, and macerated natal cle skin. Oen there is a family history of pilonidal disease. 

PRESENTATION

A pilonidal sinus, which is found within the cephalad aspect of the gluteal cle, consists of a midline pit (sinus opening) and an epithelium-lined tract. e sinus usually contains hair, and the sinuses lead to a pilonidal cyst cavity within the subcutaneous fat. ese cyst cavities are lined by chronic granulation tissue and con­tain debris and, frequently, hair shas. Multiple midline pits may be present, as well as secondary openings or stulae laterally.
e dierential diagnosis of natal cle infection includes hidradenitis suppurativa, Crohn disease, stula-in-ano, and infected skin furuncles. 

TREATMENT

Asymptomatic Pilonidal Sinus
Surgery is not recommended for asymptomatic pits. Maintenance of regional hygiene, appropriate weight loss, and consideration of depil­ation have been promoted, but simple observation is usually all that is required. 
Pilonidal Abscess
A pilonidal abscess requires drainage. Management options (Fig. 7-1) include a midline incision with excision of the central pits (deroong)
36
or an o-midline incision. Avoiding a wound in the depths of the natal cle (with its moist, anaerobic environment and ongoing fric­tional forces) is the preferred option because the alternative leaves a wound in the midline that is more likely to accumulate further loose hairs.
Overall, a midline incision for deroong and drainage of a pilo­nidal abscess takes longer to heal and requires more time o work, more dressing changes, and more extensive follow-up, with no proven impact on reducing recurrence compared with an o-midline incision and drainage procedure. An o-midline incision should be placed on the side of any secondary openings within the boundaries of any potential subsequent excisions.
Successful healing can be expected in 60% to 80% of cases aer incision and drainage of a rst-episode acute pilonidal abscess. If a wound has failed to heal by 10 weeks, it is unlikely to do so. Add­ing curettage to o-midline drainage removes debris, hair, and the granulation tissue lining the pilonidal cavity. Curettage is associated with an even higher rate of complete healing, as well as lower rates of disease recurrence.
Recurrent disease aer complete healing occurs in approximately 10% to 15% of patients. Overall, about 30% to 50% of patients will ultimately require a denitive excisional procedure.
A recent series reviewed the outcomes of patients with simple acute pilonidal abscesses (no skin necrosis, sepsis, diabetes, or immu­nocompromise) who had their abscess drained via needle aspiration and were discharged the same day with a prescription for oral anti­biotics (cephalexin and metronidazole). A total of 95% returned to normal activities, including work, within 24 hours, with no aercare requirements. e aim was for patients to return for elective surgery, but whereas half underwent formal excision about 7 weeks later, many others had no sign of recurrence at follow-up. 
Chronic Pilonidal Sinus
A chronic pilonidal sinus generally occurs aer an acute abscess; the source of the infection is the hair-containing subcutaneous cavity. e hair acts as a foreign body and allows the infection to persist and recur. Management (Fig. 7-2) is aimed at removing the hair and the granulations so the source of the infection is gone. 

NONOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Hair Removal
Meticulous regional hair control by shaving, waxing, or laser treat­ment has been promoted as a conservative nonoperative approach for chronic sinuses, as well as an adjunct to surgical management in an attempt to reduce recurrence. However, more recently a large
ANAL AND PERIANAL REGION 37
study revealed a higher rate of disease recurrence over 10 years in patients who obeyed postoperative instructions to regularly shave the region compared with those who didn’t (30.1% vs. 19.7%). Consid­eration of alternatives such as laser depilation rather than shaving, which may damage the skin and encourage recurrent disease, may be worthwhile. 

SURGERY

Lateral Drainage, Curettage, and Midline Pit Excision
Bascom described the simple technique of lateral drainage, curet­tage, and midline pit excision, similar to Lord and Millar’s midline pit excision and cavity cleansing as described in 1965. A small, verti­cal o-midline incision centered over the abscess/cyst cavity allows curettage and is le open for drainage. e midline pits are excised, and the 2- to 4-mm excision sites are sutured. e procedure can be
Most cases
Off-midline incision, drainage, and cavity curettage
FIGURE 7-1 Management of a pilonidal abscess.
Small, superficial abscess
Aspiration and oral antibiotics (consider in very selected cases)
performed as day surgery with use of a local anesthetic. In Bascom’s study of 161 patients, only one day of work was missed, no wound dressings were required, and the mean time to complete wound heal­ing was 3 weeks. A 14% recurrence rate was seen, with the majority of recurrences occurring within the mean follow-up of 3.5 years.
A larger study published a variation on Bascom’s “pit-picking” procedure and showed good results. All openings and tracts were cored out with skin trephines (from 2 mm up to 9 mm in diameter). Curved forceps or curettes, as well as cotton swabs dipped in hydro­gen peroxide, were introduced via the trephines to clear the cavities of hair, debris, and granulation tissue. All wounds were le open and no packing was needed. e recurrence rate at 5 years was about 13%. 
Local Excision and Healing by Secondary Intention
Local excision and healing by secondary intention, a simple and reproducible technique, is widely practiced. It involves regular out­patient visits, initially painful dressing changes, and for patients with larger wounds, a signicant time o work. e average healing time is well over 2 months. Marsupialization, by suturing the skin edges to the wound base, was added to wide excision with the goal of creating a smaller wound that will heal more quickly. Negative pressure dress­ings have been used to facilitate faster healing.
Wounds that are present aer excision and primary midline clo­sure heal signicantly faster than do wounds that are present aer excision without closure. However, aer open healing, a recurrence is less likely to occur. When directly compared with midline closure aer excision, open healing is associated with an estimated 60% reduction in the risk of recurrent disease.
Local excision and open healing will always be an option in the setting of recurrent disease and sepsis. However, there is no guarantee
Asymptomatic midline pits
Conservative management
Lateral drainage and pit excision
Symptomatic sinuses
Simple
Off midline
Nonexcisional techniques
Pro: Outpatient procedure under local anesthesia
Con: Highest recurrence rates
Recurrent/complex pilonidal sinus disease
Repeat Karydakis or cleft lift procedure
Karydakis
procedure
Rhomboid excision and modified Limberg flap repair
Complex
In midline
Excisional techniques
Pro: Lowest recurrence rates
Con: Requires general anesthesia
Cleft lift
procedure
Local excision and healing by secondary intention
FIGURE 7-2 Management of chronic pilonidal sinus disease.
Pilonidal SinuS38
A
B
FIGURE 7-3 Karydakis procedure. A, Cross-sectional view depicting wide local excision to sacrococcygeal fascia, full-thickness flap mobilization,
and fixation of the flap to the sacrococcygeal fascia, closing the defect. B, The eccentric elliptical incision, with the shaded area indicating the mobi­lized flap, and the final off-midline wound.
of success because the patient is still le with a deep natal cle and vulnerable skin for the duration of the healing process, with the associated risk of recurrence. 
Excision and Wound Closure: Midline or Off-Midline
than 10% of patients. Most other series using this technique, or subtle variations thereof, have achieved recurrence rates of 5% or less.
Karydakis believed that most recurrences were preventable with better technique because they occurred when the nal suture line crossed the midline, permitting hair insertion. e procedure can be repeated in the event of a recurrence. 
Closure?
If excisional surgery is required for chronic pilonidal disease, the one principle that provides a clear benet is to close the wound o the midline rather than directly in the midline of the gluteal cle. Wounds o the midline have consistently been associated with faster healing times and lower rates of wound morbidity and recurrence. For studies with follow-up longer than 12 months, the recurrence rate for o-midline closure was 1.4%, compared with 10.3% with midline closure. Nine patients would need to be treated with excision and o­midline closure to prevent one wound infection, and 11 would need to be treated in this manner to prevent one recurrence. 

FLAP-BASED PROCEDURES

Karydakis Procedure
Karydakis developed a local advancement ap technique, with the fundamental objective of stopping hair insertion by eliminating the causative factors. is technique involves attening of the natal cle and lateralizing the wound o midline. Of the ap-based procedures, it is generally believed to be the easiest to learn.
e procedure consists of an eccentric (based on the side of any secondary openings or induration), biconcave excision of the mid­line pits and associated sinus cavity down to the sacrococcygeal fascia. A full-thickness ap is then mobilized from the median side of the wound. Suturing the base of the ap to the sacrococcygeal fascia closes the defect, and skin is closed o midline (Fig. 7-3). Modica­tions of this technique include creating a smaller ap depth of only 1 cm and omitting the step of suturing the deep layer of the full­thickness ap to the sacrococcygeal fascia in an attempt to further maximize the chance of attening the gluteal cle.
Karydakis’ personal series of more than 7000 patients with 95% complete follow-up lasting as long as 20 years had an impressive recurrence rate of less than 2% and wound complications in fewer
Cleft Lift Procedure
e cle li procedure was proposed by Bascom and Bascom as a treatment for recurrent disease aer a “pit-picking” simple proce­dure. e principles are similar to a Karydakis procedure (atten­ing the natal cle and keeping the wound o the midline), but there are some major dierences in technique. Fat is not excised, and fat mobilization is not required. It was believed that the deep tissue dam­age was not the primary cause of nonhealing and thus should not be excised but rather that the shape of the natal cle is the major issue. e mission of the cle li procedure is removal of the deep natal cle and its associated warm, moist, bacteria-laden environment. e pilonidal cavity is opened aer excising skin from one side. e cavity is scrubbed free of debris with gauze. Tense cavity contractures are incised, but the cavity wall is not excised. e gluteal fat is allowed to appose naturally. A supercial skin ap from the healthy side is mobilized, and an o-midline closure is performed (Fig. 7-4).
In a small study of patients with refractory disease (with 223 previous surgical procedures among them), 95% were healed aer a single cle li procedure. ree patients required a second or third cle li procedure, but eventually all healed with no recurrence at an average follow-up of 30 months. 
Rhomboid Excision and Flap Repair
e rhomboid excision and ap repair excisional technique starts with a full-thickness rhomboid incision. e fascia-cutaneous ap is created by incising fat down to the gluteal fascia. Some variations in rhomboid excisions and ap repairs exist, the most popular of which is the Limberg ap. e upper part of the wound does cross the midline but should be well out of the depths of the gluteal cle. e inferior apex of the rhombic excision is in the midline at a depth, but an asymmetrical rhomboid (a modied Limberg ap) sited 1 to 2 cm lateral to the midline on the opposite side to the donor ap will
ANAL AND PERIANAL REGION 39
FIGURE 7-4 The cleft lift procedure. The bold lines are marked preoperatively with the patient standing. These “rim trails” are drawn where
the surface skin disappears into the chasm. With the buttocks taped apart, the ellipse of skin on the left is excised and the shaded area on the right shows the skin to be undermined. The cross-sectional view depicts how only the diseased skin is excised; the gluteal fat is allowed to appose naturally, and a thin skin flap is mobilized, allowing the final wound to sit off midline.
1
A
B
60
D
120
1
B
A
FIGURE 7-5 Rhomboid excision and modified Limberg flap repair. Note that the inferior corner of the rhomboid is located off midline.
Also note that bilateral secondary openings could potentially be included in the rhomboid excision while still being able to achieve a final wound with its inferior aspect off midline.
avoid this scenario and is the recommended technique (Fig. 7-5). e modied Limberg ap can be successfully performed with a wound complication rate of about 5% (resulting from seroma, infection, ap necrosis, and dehiscence) and a recurrence rate of less than 5%. is technique is recommended for use in complicated recurrent disease. Complex bilateral secondary openings can be included in a single rhomboid excision, which still allows a nal wound with its inferior aspect o the midline.
1
D
aspect of the wound, well away from the midline. Not all studies mentioned the indication for or timing of drain removal, but in most series removal was undertaken aer 2 to 3 days, seemingly regardless of drain output. Routine postoperative drainage is probably benecial in reducing wound collections and the need for associated interven­tions (e.g., aspiration) but has little impact on reducing wound infec­tion and recurrence rates. With good community nursing, the use of a drain should not increase the length of hospital stay. 
A meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing Limberg aps and primary closure reported lower wound infection and dehiscence with the Limberg ap and a trend toward fewer recurrences. How­ever, the meta-analysis included only two trials where it was directly compared with excision and o-midline closure (the Karydakis procedure). Apart from achieving a lower wound infection rate in one trial, overall there were no signicant dierences in outcomes between techniques.
In general, the modied Limberg ap is more technically complex to perform and probably oers no benet over the simpler excision and o-midline closure (e.g., the Karydakis or cle li procedure). 

CONCLUSION

Recently, calls have been made for surgeons who do not perform adequate numbers of ap-based procedures to stop operating on pilonidal disease. However, for most patients, the use of simple measures improves outcome, and technically complex ap repairs oer little additional benet. Careful treatment of an acute abscess with o-midline drainage and cavity curettage can signicantly reduce recurrences. When this approach is combined with use of simple techniques such as pit excision, only a small number of patients will have ongoing active disease. In such patients the rela-
ADJUNCTS TO OPERATIVE
MANAGEMENT
tively simple Karydakis and cle-li procedures can be performed, and the modied Limberg ap can be reserved for the most complex and dicult cases.
Cavity Drainage
Most major series recommend the use of a drain. Karydakis recom­mended a simple Penrose drain, but in most other series a suction drain was used. e best exit point for the drain is at the cephalad

S u g g e S t e d R e a d i n g

Al-Khamis A, McCallum I, King P, Bruce J. Healing by primary vs secondary
intention aer surgery for pilonidal sinus: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:586–587.
Pilonidal SinuS40
Bascom J, Bascom T. Failed pilonidal surgery: new paradigm and new operation
leading to cures. Arch Surg. 2002;137:1146–1150.
Bascom J, Bascom T. Utility of the cle li procedure in refractory pilonidal
disease. Am J Surg. 2007;193:606–609.
Bascom JU. Pilonidal disease: origin from follicles of hairs and results of follicle
removal as treatment. Surgery. 1980;87:567–572.
Can FM, Sevinc MM, Hancerliogullari O, Yilmaz M, Yagci G. Multicenter
prospective randomized trial comparing modied Limberg ap transpo­sition and Karydakis ap reconstruction in patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Am J Surg. 2010;200:318–327.
da Silva JH. Pilonidal cyst. Cause and treatment. Dis Colon Rectum.
2000;43:1146–1156.
Gips M, Melki Y, Salem L, Weil R, Sulkes J. Minimal surgery for pilonidal
disease using trephines: description of a new technique and long-term outcomes in 1,358 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1656–1663.
Gurer A, etal. Is routine cavity drainage necessary in Karydakis ap operation?
A prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1797–1799.
Horwood J, Hanratty D, Chandran P, Billings P. Primary closure or rhomboid
excision and Limberg ap for the management of primary sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease? A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:143–151.
Humphries AE, Duncan JE. Evaluation and management of pilonidal disease.
Surg Clin North Am. 2010;90:113–124.
Hussain ZI, Aghahoseini A, Alexander D. Converting emergency pilonidal
abscess into an elective procedure. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:640–645.
Karydakis G. Easy and successful treatment of pilonidal sinus aer explanation
of its causative process. Aust N Z J Surg. 1992;62:385–389.
Kitchen P. Pilonidal sinus: has o-midline closure become the gold standard?
Aust N Z J Surg. 2009;79:4–9.
Mahdy T. Surgical treatment of the pilonidal disease: primary closure or ap
reconstruction aer excision. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1816–1822.
McCallum IJD, King PM, Bruce J. Healing by primary closure versus open heal-
ing aer surgery for pilonidal sinus: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br Med J. 2008;336:868–871.
Petersen S, etal. Long-term eects of postoperative razor epilation in pilonidal
sinus disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:131–134.
Steele S, Perry W, Mills S, Buie W. Practice parameters for the management of
pilonidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:1021–1027.