Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_927_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
31 Мб
Скачать
ANAL AND PERIANAL REGION
81
utback procedure is another alternative for patients with per-
A c ineal stulas and can be performed when one is dealing with very small (premature) or very sick babies. is procedure consists of making a deep cut in the posterior wall and the sphincter and sutur­ing rectal wall to the skin. e functional results seem to be as good as with an anoplasty, although cosmetically the results are less than optimal. If the surgeon is not familiar with the delicate, meticulous technique required for an anoplasty, it is preferable to perform a cut­back procedure. 
Limited P
A limi stulas. ese patients require only irrigations of the colon distal to the colostomy preoperatively. e patient is placed in the prone posi­tion with the pelvis elevated. A midline, posterior sagittal incision is used, extending from the vestibule to a point located halfway along the distance to the coccyx. e sphincter mechanism is divided, including only the muscle complex and the external sphincter. Uni­form traction is applied to the stula, and the lower rectum is metic­ulously mobilized posteriorly to be placed within the limits of the sphincter mechanism. Special attention is directed to the separation of rectum from the vagina because both structures share a common wall. One must create two walls out of one, which is a very delicate maneuver and may be the main source of complications when it is not performed properly. 
osterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty with or without
P
osterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty
ted posterior sagittal anorectoplasty is used to repair vestibular
Laparotomy/Laparoscopy
A p
osterior sagittal anorectoplasty is used to repair all other defects except for cloacae. A Foley catheter is placed in the bladder, and the patient is placed in the prone position with the pelvis elevated. e midsagittal incision extends from the middle portion of the sacrum down through the anal dimple. e entire sphincter mechanism is divided, and the rectum is then meticulously separated from the uri­nary tract, preserving the urethra intact, as well as the vas deferens, seminal vesicles, and prostate. e most delicate part of the opera­tion is the separation of the rectum from the urinary tract because both structures share a common wall, without a plane of separation, for about 5 to 20 mm above the stula site. is common wall also exists between the rectum and the posterior urethra, even in patients without a stula.
Once the rectum has been separated it is mobilized down to the perineum and placed within the funnel-like sphincter, and an ano­plasty is performed. Sometimes it is necessary to tailor the rectum in order for it to be placed within the sphincter mechanism.
In cases with a recto-bladder-neck stula (which represents 10% of all cases in male patients), it is necessary to nd and mobi­lize the rectum via a laparotomy or laparoscopy. e abdominal approach is used rst, the rectum is identied, and the stula is ligated. A posterior sagittal incision is performed to create the path through which the rectum will be pulled down, within the limits of the sphincter mechanism. Tapering is performed when a bulbous rectum is identied. An anoplasty represents the last part of the operation. 
osterior Sagittal Anorectovaginourethroplasty with
P or without Laparotomy
osterior sagittal anorectovaginourethroplasty is used to repair
A p a cloaca. ese operations are usually long, technically demanding procedures that must be performed by surgeons with special dedi­cation and experience. Via a posterior sagittal approach, the rectum is separated from the genitourinary tract; the urethra and vagina
frequently are separated and mobilized down, or both may be mobi­lized together to create a separate urethra, vagina, and rectum.
About 40% of the time, it is necessary to open the abdomen to reach a very high rectum, a very high vagina, or both. Patients with very small or absent vaginas may require a form of vaginal replace­ment, which is usually performed with colon or small bowel. A sig­nicant number of patients require a ureteral reimplantation. Others need a bladder augmentation and some form of continent diversion, which means the creation of a tube (appendix, ureter, fallopian tube, or tubularized bowel) implanted in the bladder with an antireux mechanism to avoid leakage of urine and allow the emptying of the bladder through use of intermittent catheterization. 
Management of Functional Sequelae
e most devastating functional sequela seen in patients with anorec­tal malformations is fecal incontinence, which occurs in at least 30% of these patients. is complication occurs either because the patients are born without the potential for bowel control (based on the type of malformation and the quality of the sacrum), as previously men­tioned, or because some form of damage occurs during the repair of a defect with a good prognosis. A special form of bowel management program has been designed to keep these patients clean and improve their quality of life. Most patients have fecal incontinence and a ten­dency toward constipation. e bowel management implemented in that type of patient includes the use of large enemas given every day to keep the colon empty. e fact that these patients tend to have constipation happens to be serendipitous because it keeps the patient completely continent in between enemas.
In some patients the rectosigmoid or some other portion of their colon was resected at the time of the main repair. is procedure was used in patients who underwent endorectal techniques, or else a por­tion of the colon was sometimes resected for various other reasons. e nal consequence is a tendency to experience diarrhea. In these types of cases, the bowel management program includes not only the use of daily enemas but also the administration of a constipating diet and medication to slow down the colon motility. is last group of patients is more dicult to manage. Overall, in our experience, 95% of patients can be kept continent through use of a form of bowel management.
Once the patient is continent with the implementation of a daily enema through the rectum, and as the patient grows and wants to become more independent, an operation called a continent appendi­costomy is oered. e appendix is implanted at the patient’s umbi­licus. e cecum is usually plicated around the appendix to create a one-way valve mechanism. For patients who lost their appendix in the past, a continent neoappendicostomy is created by making a neoappendix with a tubularized ap of cecum plus a plication of the cecum around it to provide continence.
Constipation is the most common sequela experienced by patients who were born with an imperforate anus and underwent a repair in which the original rectum and colon of the patient were preserved. Paradoxically, the lower the defect, the worse the constipation expe
ienced by the patient. is symptom must be treated energetically
r because untreated constipation creates more constipation. e degree of constipation also correlates with the degree of megarectum that the patient experienced originally. e megarectum is more severe in patients subjected to a transverse colostomy and is the worst in patients with loop colostomies that allow the spillage of stool from proximal to distal stoma. Severe constipation and chronic fecal impaction may subsequently provoke overow pseudoincontinence, which is another reason to treat the constipation to ensure that the rectum empties every day.
Urinary incontinence in male patients with imperforate anus occurs only in those born with an absent sacrum or in those who sus­tained nerve damage during the repair of their otherwise benign ano­rectal malformation. In female patients, on the other hand, urinary
-
82
AnorectAl congenitAl DisorDers
continence occurs in 20% of girls who have a cloaca with a com-
in mon channel shorter than 3 cm and in 70% of girls who have a cloaca and a common channel longer than 3 cm. Most of these patients can be kept dry through the use of intermittent catheterization.
u
S
B
ischo A, Levitt M, Bauer C, et al. Treatment of fecal incontinence
Bischo A, Levitt MA, Peña A. Bowel management for the treatment of pedi-
Bischo A, Peña A, Levitt MA. Laparoscopic-assisted PSARP—the advantages
Bischo A, Tovilla M. A practical approach to the management of pediatric
Chatoorgoon K, Peña A, Lawal T, etal. Neoappendicostomy in the manage-
Levitt MA, Bischo A, Breech L, Peña A. Rectovestibular stula—rarely recog-
S t
g g e
with a comprehensive bowel management program. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44:1278–1284.
atric fecal incontinence. Pediatr Surg Int. 2009;25:1027–1042.
of combining both techniques for the treatment of anorectal malforma­tions with recto-bladderneck or high prostatic stulas. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48:367–371.
fecal incontinence. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2010;19:154–159.
ment of pediatric fecal incontinence. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46:1243–1249.
nized associated gynecologic anomalies. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44:1261–1267.
e d
R
e
a d i n g
S
Levitt MA, Bischo A, Peña A. Pitfalls and challenges of cloaca repair; how
to reduce the need for reoperations. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46:1250–1255.
Levitt MA, Soffer SZ, Peña A. Continent appendicostomy in the bowel
management of fecal incontinent children. J Pediatr Surg. 1997;32:
1630–1633. Peña A. Anorectal malformations. Semin Pediatr Surg. 1995;4:35–47. Peña A. Posterior sagittal anorectal plasty; results in the management of 332
cases of anorectal malformations. Pediatr Surg Int. 1988;3:4–104. Peña A. Surgical management of persistent cloaca: results in 54 patients treat-
ed with a posterior sagittal approach. J Pediatr Surg. 1989;24:590–598. Peña A. Total urogenital mobilization—an easier way to repair cloacas.
J Pediatr Surg. 1997;2:263–268. Peña A, Migotto-Krieger M, Levitt MA. Colostomy in anorectal malforma-
tions: a procedure with serious but preventable complications. J Pediatr
Surg. 2006;41:748–756. Rangel SJ, Lawal TA, Bischo A, etal. e appendix as a conduit for ante-
grade continence enemas in patients with anorectal malformations: les-
sons learned from 163 cases treated over 18 years. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46:
1236–1242. Rich M, Brock W, Peña P. Spectrum of genitourinary malformations in pa-
tients with imperforate anus. Pediatr Surg Int. 1988;3:110–113. Torres P, Levitt MA, Tovilla JM, etal. Anorectal malformations and Down’s
syndrome. J Pediatr Surg. 1998;33:1–5.
H
 D
INTR
ODUCTION AND HISTORY
irschsprung disease represents a common cause of intestinal
H obstruction in newborns. ese patients do not have an actual mechanical obstruction but rather a serious disturbance in normal colonic peristalsis because of a lack of ganglion cells. e disease was named aer Dr. Harald Hirschsprung, who presented what is con­sidered a classic description of this condition at the Pediatric Con­gress in Berlin in 1886. His description, however, referred only to a congenital dilation of the colon, without a real understanding of the histologic features and pathogenesis.
e recognition that aganglionosis in the distal part of the colon is the main cause of symptoms in these patients led to the surgical treatment used presently. Swenson and Bill described the rst such approach, consisting of resection of the aganglionic segment and pull through of a normal piece of colon to be connected to the anal canal. Variations of this basic principle were subsequently introduced into the literature, including the Duhamel procedure, the Rehbein approach in 1959, the Soave operation, the Boley modication, and the De La Torre transanal resection of aganglionic bowel. More recently, laparoscopic techniques have been added to the treatment approach. 

ETIOLOGY, PATHOPHYSIOLOGY, AND INCIDENCE

e absence of ganglion cells in the submucosal (Meissner)
Th plexus and in the intermuscular (Auerbach) plexus in the distal intestine, as well as a marked increase in nerve fibers that extend into the submucosa, are the hallmarks of this condition. Patients also have an increase in acetylcholinesterase activity. The lack of ganglion cells affects the most distal part of the rectosigmoid in about 80% of cases—the so-called “typical cases” of Hirschsprung disease. The extent of the aganglionosis varies; it may reach any­where from the descending colon to the transverse colon, where it is called “long-segment Hirschsprung disease,” and it may even affect the entire colon (“total colonic aganglionosis”). Reports have been made of patients with universal aganglionosis (total intestinal aganglionosis), a condition that thus far has been incompatible with life.
e fecal stasis that occurs in the proximal normal bowel does not produce a fecal impaction alone, as in cases of idiopathic con­stipation. ese patients have other poorly understood functional abnormalities that may explain other more serious symptoms. e fecal stasis leads to bacterial overgrowth, which produces explosive diarrhea, abdominal distention, fever, and a very serious toxic con­dition. An inammatory inltrate of the intestinal mucosa occurs, the mucosa becomes ulcerated, and bacteria then traverse the intestinal epithelium. Abnormal bacteria proliferate, particularly

Andr
ea Bischoff and Alberto Peña
lostridium dicile. is condition is called “enterocolitis” and may
C
occur from the rst hours aer the baby is born before he or she undergoes surgery or even aer completion of a successful opera­tion. Unknown factors contribute to this serious and mysterious condition. e babies become extremely sick, with development of an endotoxemia that is lethal if it is not treated aggressively and eectively.
e incidence of Hirschsprung disease has been reported to be 1 in 4000 to 1 in 7000. e disease has a denite male preponderance except for the long-segment type of Hirschsprung disease, in which the ratio seems to be 1:1 male to female. Ospring of male and female patients with long-segment Hirschsprung disease have an approxi­mately 20% chance of being aected. 
CLINIC
Traditionally, Hirschsprung disease was suspected in children who had constipation. However, during the past several decades the index of suspicion for this condition has increased, leading to earlier diag­nosis. In the United States today, it is rather unusual to nd an undi­agnosed school-aged patient with this condition.
e most common manifestation of Hirschsprung disease during the newborn period is the lack of passage of meconium during the rst 24 hours, which is highly suspicious for Hirschsprung disease. Subsequently, the abdomen becomes distended and the baby vomits. Symptoms progress as in any other case of colonic obstruction. e baby looks toxic, lethargic, dehydrated, and septic. Rectal stimula­tion with a thermometer or a nger provokes characteristic explo­sive bowel movements, followed by passage of large amounts of fetid gas, giving the baby temporary relief. However, a few hours later the symptoms recur.
A small percentage of patients may survive without medical help. In time, clinical signs of severe constipation, abdominal distension, and failure to thrive develop.
Untreated patients with Hirschsprung disease who survive and reach school age have severe megacolon. These patients must be differentiated from patients with idiopathic constipation. Patients with Hirschsprung disease have a large amount of stool located in the very dilated proximal colon. However, the distal, agangli­onic segment is usually empty. Patients with severe idiopathic constipation have a megarectum and fecal impaction located all the way down to the area of the anal canal. A huge fecal impac­tion can be felt upon examination with a finger, whereas patients with Hirschsprung disease are described as having an empty rec­tum. Patients with Hirschsprung disease characteristically do not soil their underwear. Only a very small percentage of all patients with Hirschsprung disease reach this age. Most undiagnosed patients die in the early stages of the condition because of a lack of treatment. 
AL MANIFESTATIONS
83
84
HirscHsprung Disease

DIAGNOSIS

A
high index of suspicion is the most important element for the early diagnosis and treatment of Hirschsprung disease. A plain abdominal radiograph shows very dilated loops of bowel. Unfortunately, dur­ing the newborn period, it is extremely dicult to dierentiate small bowel from large bowel on a plain abdominal lm. Aected patients have a dilated colon proximal to the aganglionic portion.
Babies with Hirschsprung disease do not have a severe degree of megacolon. However, as time goes by, the colon proximal to the agan­glionic segment becomes more and more dilated, showing a dramatic contrast with the nondilated distal bowel and the transition zone. e clinician should not expect to nd a conspicuous megacolon with a distal narrow segment in the newborn.
A contrast enema is extremely important for the diagnosis of this condition. Contrast enemas do not demonstrate a transition zone in all cases, and their value varies from institution to institu­tion, depending to a large extent on the experience of the observer. A positive contrast study shows a nondilated distal large bowel with a dilated proximal segment. Sometimes the diagnosis is obvious, but sometimes the transition between dilated and nondilated sections is not well demarcated. In patients with total colonic aganglionosis, no colonic dilatation occurs; the dilatation mainly aects the small bowel.
e contrast study in these babies must be performed by an expe­rienced pediatric radiologist. A catheter is introduced through the anus not more than 4 cm. Passing the catheter more than 4 cm will result in the injection of the contrast material directly into the dilated portion of the colon, bypassing the nondilated portion and the tran­sition zone and therefore precluding a diagnosis. Failure to pass the contrast material in the 24 hours aer the study is considered to be highly suggestive of Hirschsprung disease.
Occasionally, an unattended baby may experience a bowel perfo­ration. e perforation is usually in the cecum, a presentation which in itself is suggestive of Hirschsprung disease. When a bowel perfora­tion occurs, emergency surgery is necessary.
Anorectal Manometry
I
nation of a balloon in the rectum of a healthy person produces a drop in pressure in the anal canal. is drop in pressure is called the “rectoanal inhibitory reex” and is present in all healthy per­sons. Anorectal manometry in children with symptoms suggestive of Hirschsprung disease is performed with the goal of eliciting such a reex. A lack of relaxation of the anal canal is considered diagnostic of Hirschsprung disease. However, a signicant degree of controversy exists about the value of this diagnostic test, and most pediatric cen­ters and surgeons do not use it. 
Rectal Biopsy
ectal biopsy is the denitive diagnostic test in children with
A r Hirschsprung disease; however, it requires interpretation by an expe­rienced pediatric pathologist. Most surgeons and pediatric centers use a suction biopsy for the diagnosis of this condition. A suction biopsy can be performed at the bedside and is considered highly diagnostic. One of the limitations of this type of procedure is that the specimen may not include submucosa and therefore is not suf­cient for an accurate diagnosis. Another limitation is performing the biopsy too distal in the rectum, where absence of ganglion cells is supposedly normal. Although the diagnosis of aganglionosis can be made with a suction rectal biopsy, the length of the abnormality can­not be determined with this biopsy.
A full-thickness rectal biopsy provides a much better specimen; however, induction of anesthesia is required to perform this biopsy. Full-thickness rectal biopsies are still performed by pathologists who
re not familiar with using a suction biopsy to diagnose Hirschsprung
a disease and by surgeons who do not have access to the suction biopsy device. An increase in the activity of acetylcholinesterase is also con­sidered diagnostic, but not all pathologists rely on this analysis. 
TMENT
TREA
Resuscitation
A n
ewborn baby who has abdominal distension, vomiting, dehydra­tion, and explosive fetid bowel movements and who looks toxic and lethargic needs emergency management. Administration of intrave­nous uids and antibiotics and—most importantly—rectal irriga­tions must be started promptly.
We do not know much about the pathophysiology of the entero­colitis that may lead to death in these children. However, stasis seems to be the most important predisposing factor, and therefore decom­pressing the colon leads to dramatic improvement; this maneuver can be performed on a temporary basis by passing a rectal tube. Some­times the characteristics of the meconium and the fecal matter may interfere with the drainage of gas and liquid from the colon through the tube. erefore, the tube should be irrigated with small amounts of saline solution (10 to 15 mL) and moved back and forth. is tech­nique produces a spectacular decompression of the colon with a dra­matic improvement of the patient’s symptoms. Sometimes the babies are so sick that one cannot consider performing a contrast enema because of the risk of perforation. e rectal irrigations and admin­istration of antibiotics and intravenous uids allow improvement so that other diagnostic and therapeutic procedures can be performed. When the baby recovers from the acute enterocolitis, a rectal biopsy is performed, establishing the denitive diagnosis. 
Surger
T in three stages. e rst stage consisted of a diverting colostomy, which decompressed the colon and allowed the baby to recover and go home. Most surgeons create a colostomy in the right transverse colon (or an ileostomy was created in cases of total colonic agangli­onosis). e second stage was resection of the aganglionic segment and pull through of the normal bowel to be anastomosed to the anal canal with the technique of choice. e third stage was closure of the colostomy aer the baby recovered completely from the main pull­through procedure.
tion, a colostomy was created immediately proximal to the transition zone, called a “leveled colostomy.” In the second and denitive stage, surgeons performed the pull through, pulling down what used to be the colostomy into the anal canal and leaving the patient without a protective colostomy.
through during the rst few days, weeks, or months of life as a pri­mary procedure without a protective colostomy. is approach avoids two operations (a colostomy and colostomy closure) and is feasible without adding extra morbidity. However, a colostomy is still an extremely valuable option for some babies with Hirschsprung dis­ease. For instance, a very sick baby who has other aggravating fac­tors and/or enterocolitis still could be a candidate for this type of preliminary procedure. In general, most surgeons take these babies to the operating room for a pull-through procedure with a plan for a colostomy if necessary. When the technical circumstances of a pull-through procedure are not satisfactory and the surgeon has any questions about the viability of the pulled-through bowel in terms of blood supply or any other type of technical diculty, he or she can always protect the pull through with a proximal colostomy. Also, in
y
raditionally, patients with Hirschsprung disease were treated
A two-stage repair was subsequently devised. In the rst opera-
e most recent approach involves performing the main pull
ANAL AND PERIANAL REGION
85
h
ospitals, cities, or countries with inadequate conditions and infra-
structure, a surgeon can save the baby’s life with a colostomy.
To perform the primary neonatal pull through, one should expect to have a newborn baby in excellent clinical condition with a colon that has been completely decompressed. Several days are usually required to prepare such a baby for surgery, using parenteral nutri­tion and colonic irrigations. 
Main Repair
enson Procedure
Sw
e Swenson procedure was the rst to be designed specically to treat Hirschsprung disease and was used for many years by Dr. Swenson himself. A few surgeons still perform the original Swen­son operation. For this type of pull-through operation, a total body preparation is performed so the surgeon can approach the abdomen or the perineum several times either by turning the patient from the supine into the prone position or simply by liing the legs up to approach the perineum and then down to approach the abdomen. Transabdominally, the aganglionic portion of the colon is resected, including the most dilated portion of the bowel (Fig. 18-1, A). In a case of typical Hirschsprung disease, only the splenic exure must be mobilized. On the other hand, when dealing with long-segment type disease, it may be necessary to mobilize the right colon to obtain enough length for the pull-through procedure. e aganglionic por­tion of the colon below the peritoneal oor is dissected in a very pre­cise manner, staying as close as possible to the rectal wall down to the level of the levator ani muscle. e dissection of the rectum includes the ligation of the middle hemorrhoidal vessels and the use of cautery in the perirectal vasculature (Fig. 18-1). Special care is taken to pre­serve the anal canal above the dentate line. e aganglionic segment of the colon is resected and normal colon is pulled through (Fig. 18-1,
B and C) and anastomosed by a conventional, transanal, hand-sewn
technique. e basic principles of this procedure are still observed in most modern operations. Dr. Swenson developed an extraordinary experience with this operation with good outcomes. However, other surgeons reported damage of important pelvic nerves, and thus other procedures were designed, such as those created by Duhamel and Soave. 
Duhamel Procedure
Duhamel designed a procedure with the specic purpose of avoid­ing extensive pelvic dissection by preserving the pelvic portion of the
aganglionic rectum, which entails dividing the bowel at the perito­neal reection as distally as possible (Fig. 18-2, A). e aganglionic rectal stump is then closed. e normoganglionic bowel is pulled down right in front of the sacrum in a safe space behind the rectum that is created by blunt dissection (Fig. 18-2, B). Lateral dissection is therefore avoided, which prevents nerve damage. e posterior rectal wall is incised above the dentate line, entering the previously dissected retro rectal space. e normoganglionic bowel is pulled through the rectal incision in the posterior wall of the rectum, and a gastrointestinal anastomosis (GIA) stapler is used to create an anas­tomosis between the aganglionic rectum and the normoganglionic pulled-down bowel (Fig. 18-2, C–F). e anastomosis between the pulled-through colon and the aganglionic rectum is created to be as wide as possible, and the rectal stump must be as small as possible to avoid fecal accumulation (Fig. 18-2, G).
is procedure is very appealing because it is easy to perform and technically reproducible. e main problem with this operation is that the aganglionic rectum continues to be aected by the dysmotil­ity disorder of the primary Hirschsprung condition. Stool tends to accumulate in the rectal stump, and patients oen return for follow­up with a hypertrophic aganglionic rectum and a large fecal impac­tion. Oen they require a repeat operation to remove the aganglionic portion and create an end-to-end anastomosis as in the Swenson operation. 
Soave Procedure
Franco Soave, an Italian surgeon, created an ingenious and appealing operation with the specic purpose of avoiding the consequences of nerve damage caused by an imprecise Swenson dissection. e agan­glionic rectosigmoid is resected via an endorectal dissection, theo­retically minimizing the risk of pelvic injury (Fig. 18-3, A and B).
e normoganglionic colon is passed through the rectal muscu­lar cu that is le aer the endorectal dissection (Fig. 18-3, C and
D). ere is no aganglionic segment of rectum le, such as with the
Duhamel procedure. is procedure is less reproducible than the Duhamel procedure and requires meticulous technique in the dissec­tion of the mucosa from the muscular cu. e endorectal dissection is performed immediately around the mucosal layer and inside the smooth muscle layer of the bowel (Fig. 18-3, C). is dissection is usually initiated 1 or 2 cm above the peritoneal reection. It is carried down to a point about 1 cm above the dentate line to preserve the anal canal with its sphincters and sensation. e normoganglionic colon is anastomosed to the anal canal about 1 cm above the dentate line (
Fig
. 18-3, D). Soave originally performed this operation without a
colostomy, leaving a portion of the pulled-through colon protruding
AB C
FIGURE 18-1 Sw
pletion of the operation.
enson surgical technique.
A, Resection of the aganglionic and dilated bo
wel. B, Pull through of normal ganglionic bowel. C, Com-
86
HirscHsprung Disease
D
B
A
C
E
FIGURE 18-2
C, Pull through of normal ganglionic bowel. D, Incision of the posterior rectal wall, above the dentate line. E, Pull through of normal aganglionic colon through the window in the posterior rectal wall. F, Creating a wide anastomosis between normal ganglionic and aganglionic segments. G, Completion of the operation.
w
ell beyond the anal skin margin. About a week later, this portion of the bowel was resected and an anastomosis was created between the normoganglionic bowel and the anal canal. is operation was modi­ed by Boley, who proposed a primary anastomosis, thus avoiding the second procedure. 
La
paroscopic Procedures
L
aparoscopic techniques have been used in the management of Hirschsprung disease. e purpose of using laparoscopic techniques is to substitute a minimally invasive technique for a formal laparot­omy, resulting in less postoperative pain and leading to a smoother recovery and earlier discharge. Laparoscopy has been shown to be useful in the management of these patients. Surgeons can still use their preferred technique (e.g., Swenson, Duhamel, Soave), but the procedure is less invasive when laparoscopy is used instead of a lapa­rotomy. We believe that the use of laparoscopy will not have any nega­tive impact on the results, and we favor use of this technology when possible. 
T
ransanal Approach
M
ore recently, De La Torre created a simple but ingenious and
original way to treat Hirschsprung disease. He demonstrated rst
The Duhamel technique. A, Resection of the dilated por
F
tion and part of the aganglionic segment. B, Presacral, retrorectal dissection.
in animals and then in human beings that the rectosigmoid can be resected in a purely transanal fashion. e resection is performed and the aganglionic segment is pulled down simultaneously through the anus. Interestingly, in the most common type of Hirschsprung disease (the so-called “classic type”), the entire aganglionic segment can be resected transanally and the normoganglionic colon can be anastomosed to the anal canal, also transanally avoiding any type of laparotomy or laparoscopy. Fortunately, the so-called classic form of Hirschsprung disease represents approximately 80% of cases, which gives extra value to this ingenious technique. e transanal approach has been adopted rapidly, and larger series of cases have been reported.
When the transanal approach is used, the patient is placed in the lithotomy or prone position with the pelvis elevated. A Lone Star retractor is used to expose the anal canal (Fig. 18-4, A). e great advantage of this retractor is that it can open the anus in a symmetric, circumferential manner and expose the anal canal very clearly. Mul­tiple 6-0 silk sutures are placed in the rectal mucosa above the anal canal to exert uniform traction, which is very important to enable an ecient and neat dissection of the rectum to be performed, above the dentate line (Fig. 18-4, B). e original De La Torre technique actu­ally is an endorectal technique performed from below. At our institu­tion, we have been using a full-thickness dissection, which could be called a Swenson procedure performed transanally. Both techniques are equally useful and can be performed, depending on the experi­ence of the operator. While applying uniform traction to the multiple
G
ANAL AND PERIANAL REGION
87
A
C
6-0 s
titches, a circumferential dissection is performed either submu­cosally or full thickness, dividing and cauterizing the extrinsic blood supply of the rectum. In this manner we can gain length in the dis­section, and surprisingly, one can reach the peritoneal reection very rapidly (Fig. 18-4, C). As the dissection progresses, one can obtain full-thickness biopsy specimens.
We advise obtaining full-thickness biopsy specimens every 5 cm during this dissection. e dissection must continue until the normoganglionic bowel is reached. If at that point the surgeon per­ceives that the colon is already normoganglionic but very dilated, it is mandatory to continue the dissection until a normoganglionic and nondilated portion of the colon is reached. One can usually comfort­ably and safely dissect and resect the rectosigmoid up to the junction of the sigmoid with the descending colon. e procedure becomes rather risky and uncomfortable when trying to go higher than that, even when it is feasible to do so. At that point, one can continue lapa­roscopically or with a laparotomy.
It is our practice to perform an end-to-end anastomosis with two layers of interrupted 6-0 long-term absorbable sutures between the normoganglionic, nondistended portion of the colon and the anal canal (Fig. 18-4, D). e patient will receive parenteral nutrition, and oral feedings are initiated 5 days aer the operation. 
COMPLIC
W
e believe that operative complications in patients with Hirschsprung disease can be divided into two categories; preventable and non­preventable. Preventable complications include fecal incontinence,
ATIONS
B
D
FIGURE 18-3
of dilated colon plus the intra segment. B, Endorectal intrapelvic dissection. C, Resection of the m down to the dentate line. D, Pull through of normal ganglionic bowel through the muscle cuff and anastomosis 1 cm above the dentate line.
dehiscence, retraction, stula formation, and constipation. ese complications can be minimized through use of meticulous surgical technique.
F
ecal Incontinence
F
ecal incontinence is still a relatively frequent problem in patients who undergo surgery for Hirschsprung disease. We believe that fecal incontinence occurs mainly when the surgeon violates basic principles, regardless of the type of technique used. Basically, fecal incontinence means that the anal canal is damaged. is crucial area, extending from 1 cm above the dentate line down to the skin, must be preserved, regardless of the surgical technique used in the treat­ment of Hirschsprung disease. e anal canal contains the most sen­sitive area of the gastrointestinal tract and the sphincter mechanism. Patients with sphincter damage benet from a bowel management program. 
The Soa
ve technique.
ucosal aganglionic segment
A, Resection
peritoneal aganglionic
Dehiscence and Retraction
nastomotic dehiscence and retraction of the colon usually occur
A as a consequence of a decient technique in the management of the blood supply of the normoganglionic bowel. It is very important to observe the blood supply of the colon very carefully before making a decision to ligate a branch of the inferior mesenteric, middle colic, or ileocolic vessels. e segment to be pulled down must have good blood supply through the collateral arcades of the colonic vessels. In
88
HirscHsprung Disease
A B
FIGURE 18-4
orre) technique. A, A Lone Star
T retractor is used to expose the rectal mucosa and pectinate line. B, Multiple silk stitches after repositioning the Lone star hooks deeper than the pectinate line, taking rectal mucosa above the pectinate line. C, Full-thickness dissection of the rectum after the peritoneal reflection and beyond. D, Anastomosis of normal ganglionic bowel to the rectum 1 cm above the pectinate line.
addi
tion, the pulled-through colon must lie in its position without
T
ransanal (De La
CD
any tension. 
Constipation
C
onstipation occurs mainly in patients in whom normoganglionic but dilated colon has been pulled down. We have learned through the years that a very dilated piece of colon is almost as bad as an agan­glionic segment. Evidence indicates that abnormally dilated por­tions of any hollow viscus lose their peristalsis capability. erefore, regardless of the technique used by the surgeon, it is imperative to pull down a nondilated normoganglionic part of the colon. However, there may be as yet undened factors responsible for the hypomotil­ity observed in normoganglionic colon because many patients still experience postoperative constipation in spite of pulling down a non­dilated portion of the colon. 
Nonpr
En unpredictable complication seen in patients with Hirschsprung dis­ease. Some surgeons claim that they do not see enterocolitis in their patients. Perhaps they do not look for this specic complication, only thinking of enterocolitis when they see an extremely sick child.
eventable Complications
terocolitis is the most feared, mysterious, nonpreventable, and
W
e try to detect these cases very early. We start by obtaining radio­graphs very early postoperatively. One can see dierent degrees of dilatation of the colon, as well as irregularities in the bowel mucosa that indicate that the patient is at risk for the development of enterocolitis. We treat these patients with rectal irrigations and administration of metronidazole by mouth and sometimes by rec­tum. In this manner we try to avoid a full picture of enterocolitis and prevent patients from experiencing this complication. We are unaware of any specic ways to prevent enterocolitis. Some sur­geons claim that myectomies and anal dilatations give good results in the management of enterocolitis. Other surgeons use botulinum toxin, supposedly injected into the internal sphincter. Results have been good, but only for short periods. 
RESUL
M
ortality as a result of Hirschsprung disease has been reported to
TS
be between 0 and 3.3%. Advocates of the Swenson procedure report that 13% of their patients have temporary soiling and 16% to 27% have postoperative enterocolitis. Advocates of the Duhamel proce­dure report a 10% complication rate, whereas advocates of the Soave procedure report a 12% incidence of strictures.
We believe that enterocolitis has been underestimated and under­reported. e incidence of this complication in dierent analyses var­ies from 10% to 30%.
ANAL AND PERIANAL REGION
89
esults of the transanal approach of Hirschsprung disease are still
R considered preliminary because of the lack of long-term follow-up. Early follow-up indicates that the results are similar to those obtained with previously used techniques. e transanal approach has obvious advantages compared with the other operations because it is the least invasive, including laparoscopy. e main concern with the transanal approach, of course, is the possibility of interfering with bowel con­trol because of the stretch of the sphincter mechanism that is required to expose the anal canal. 
T
OTAL COLONIC AGANGLIONOSIS
T
otal colonic aganglionosis is a particular variant of Hirschsprung disease that continues to represent a serious technical challenge. Dif­ferent treatments have been designed to deal with this condition, but all of them are less than ideal in terms of quality of life. In 1968, Les­ter Martin described his technique for the treatment of total colonic aganglionosis. Patients with total colonic aganglionosis require resec­tion of the entire colon and pull-through of the normoganglionic small bowel to be connected to the anal canal. As expected, these patients experience multiple bowel movements during the day and night, severe diaper rash, and a tendency to be dehydrated. To avoid these symptoms, Martin thought that it could be useful to preserve a signicant portion of the aganglionic colon to take advantage of its water absorption capacity and also to create a type of reservoir that would allow the patient to hold the stool and decrease the number of bowel movements per day. Dr. Martin proposed preserving the rectosigmoid and sometimes even longer portions of the colon. e normal ganglionic terminal ileum is then pulled down through the presacral space (as in the Duhamel technique) and anastomosed to the rectum. A long side to side anastomosis is created between the terminal ileum and the rectosigmoid. However, patients undergoing this procedure frequently have abdominal distention and bouts of enterocolitis. We now know that the small bowel functions well with rapid transit. Stasis in the small bowel produces an inammatory process that results not only in lack of absorption of water but also a secretory type of diarrhea and enterocolitis. Many of these patients have to undergo a repeat operation to resect the pouch or patch of aganglionic bowel. Others have tried to modify Martin’s original pro­cedure. Kimura, for instance, created a right colon patch basically fol­lowing the same principles. Martin or Kimura procedures are usually performed with a protecting ileostomy.
Our routine practice for treating patients with total colonic agan­glionosis includes an ileostomy with or without a total colectomy with ileoanal anastomosis at the time of presentation. We close the ileos­tomy only aer the patient meets two criteria: he/she is toilet trained for urine and he/she accepts rectal irrigations. e rationale behind this rather conservative approach is based on the fact that babies nor­mally do not hold their stool at young ages, and the constant passage of liquid stool from an ileum-anal pull-through procedure produces a severe diaper rash that is not easily manageable. Once the patient is toilet trained for urine, even with frequent episodes of liquid stool, the patient is able to reach the toilet. Acceptance of rectal irrigation is necessary because the longer the aganglionic segment, the higher the chances of enterocolitis.
Boley S. An endorectal pull-through operation with primary anastomosis for
Hirschsprung’s disease. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1968;127:353.
Chatoorgoon K, Peña A, Lawal TA, etal. e problematic Duhamel pouch in
Hirschsprung’s disease: manifestations and treatment. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2011;21:366–369.
Cilley RE, etal. Denitive treatment of Hirschsprung’s disease in the newborn
with a one-stage procedure. Surgery. 1994;115:551.
De La Torre L, Ortega J. Transanal endorectal pullthrough for Hirschsprung’s
disease. J Pediatr Surg. 1998;33:1283.
Duhamel B. A new operation for the treatment of Hirschsprung’s disease.
Arch Dis Child. 1960;35:38.
Elhalaby EA, et al. Enterocolitis associated with Hirschsprung’s disease: a
clinical-radiological characterization based on 168 patients. J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30:76.
Georgeson KE, Fuenfer MM, Hardin WD. Primary laparoscopic pullthrough for
Hirschsprung’s disease in infants and children. J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30:1017.
Hirschsprung H. Stuhltragheit neugeborner in folge von dilatation and hyper-
trophie des colons. Jaharb Kinderch. 1887;27:1.
Kimura K, Mishijima E, Muraji T. A new surgical approach to extensive agan-
glionosis. J Pediatr Surg. 1981;16:840.
Kleinhaus S, etal. Hirschsprung’s disease—a survey of the members of the
surgical section of the American Academy of Pediatrics. J Pediatr Surg. 1979;14:588.
Lake BD, Malone MT, Risdon RA. e use of acetylcholinesterase (AchE) in
the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease and intestinal neuronal dysplasia. Pediatr Pathol. 1989;9:351.
Lake BD, Puri P, Nixon HH, et al. Hirschsprung’s disease: an appraisal of
histochemically demonstrated acetylcholinesterase activity in suction rectal biopsy specimens as an aid to diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1978;102:244.
Langer JC, Durrant AC, De La Torre L, etal. One-stage transanal Soave pull-
through for Hirschsprung’s disease. A multi-center experience with 141 children. Ann Surg. 2003;238:569.
Langer JC, Minkes RK, Mazziott MV, etal. Transanal one stage Soave proce-
dure for infants with Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg. 1999;34:148.
Levitt M, Martin C, Olesevich M, et al. Hirschsprung’s disease and fecal
incontinence: diagnostic and management strategies. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44:271–277.
Martin LW. Surgical management of Hirschsprung’s disease involving the
small intestine. Arch Surg. 1968;97:183.
Rescorla FJ, etal. Hirschsprung’s disease. Evaluation of mortality and long-
term function in 260 cases. Arch Surg. 1992;127:934.
Schoeld DE, Devine W, Unis EJ. Acetylcholinesterase-stained suction rectal
biopsies in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1990;11:221.
So HB, Schwartz DL, Becher JM, etal. Endorectal pullthrough without pre-
liminary colostomy in patients with Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg. 1980;15:470.
Soave F. Hirschsprung’s disease: a new surgical technique. Arch Dis Child.
1964;39:116.
Swenson O, Bill AH. Resection of rectum and rectosigmoid with preservation
of the sphincter for benign spastic lesions producing megacolon. Surgery. 1948;24:212.
Swenson O, Sherman JO, Fisher JH. Diagnosis of congenital megacolon: an
analysis of 501 patients. J Pediatr Surg. 1973;8:587.
Vane D, Grosfeld J. Hirschsprung’s disease, experience with the Duhamel op-
eration in 195 cases. Pediatr Surg Int. 1986;1:95.
S u g g e S t e d
B
ischo A, Levitt M, Bauer C, etal. Treatment of fecal incontinence with
a comprehensive bowel management program. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44:
1278–1284. Bischo A, Levitt MA, Peña A. Bowel management for the treatment of pedi-
atric fecal incontinence. Pediatr Surg Int. 2009;25:1027–1042. Bischo A, Levitt MA, Peña A. Total colonic aganglionosis: a surgical chal-
lenge. How to avoid complications? Pediatr Surg Int. 2011;27:1047–1052. Bischo A, Tovilla M. A practical approach to the management of pediatric
fecal incontinence. Sem Pediatr Surg. 2010;19:154–159.
R
e a d i n g
This page intentionally left blank