Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_927_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
31 Мб
Скачать
COLON
211
va
ginal wall, the skin paddle may be used for reconstruction. e gracilis ap is oen used to ll the distal pelvic cavity because this area is most prone to infection, leading to a UPW.
e VRAM ap is based on the inferior epigastric artery and brings healthy, nonradiated skin, subcutaneous fat, and muscle to the perineum. is ap has the potential to aect stoma siting at the ini­tial operation and in the future should problems arise (e.g., a signi­cant stomal hernia and prolapse). A VRAM ap with its larger bulk may be preferable to a primary gracilis ap in men, who don’t have the posterior vaginal wall to ll some of the pelvis. 
GNOSIS/WORKUP
DIA
hronic UPWs are generally lined by granulation tissue (Fig.
C
41-3). Our proposed algorithm for their management is shown
in Figure 41-4.
e algorithm begins with a careful evaluation of the unhealed wound, which may include an examination with use of an anesthetic. A plastic surgery consultation for possible ap closure should be considered. e size of the defect, quality of the surrounding tissues, proximity to the urethra and vagina, presence of any foreign body, and presence of any ongoing infection need to be determined. Malig­nant degeneration of chronic, unhealed wounds has been reported, and thus any suspicious lesions should be biopsied. In patients who have undergone radiation, it is helpful to nd the tattoos marking the extent of the radiated eld. Infection should be eradicated prior to denitive treatment.
In patients who have very deep wounds or provide a history that is suspicious for a fistula, further diagnostic testing is often necessary. Cross-sectional imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging or a computed tomography scan can define persistent pelvic fluid collections and provide a useful road map by outlining the anatomy. The addition of enteric contrast material is helpful to delineate a fistula, if one is suspected. Fistulography performed with fluoroscopy during an examination of an anesthetized patient can also be useful. 
NONOPERA
nitial nonoperative treatment requires patience, attention to
I
TIVE TREATMENT
hygiene, gentle outpatient debridement of necrotic tissue, and drainage of any associated infection. e use of negative-pressure vacuum dressings has been described. In a recent series, Ip and co
lleagues reported that 23% of their patients’ proctectomy wounds
r
emained unhealed at 12 months; many wounds that were unhealed at 6 months had closed by 1 year. However, some wounds do not heal and evolve into a low-output, minimally symptomatic, man­ageable chronic sinus. ese patients do not necessarily require any active treatment. 
FIGURE 41-3
tissue
.
An unhealed perineal w
Unhealed perineal wound >6 months after proctectomy
ound with excessive granulation
Asymptomatic or improving
Symptomatic, not improving
Workup: Exam under anesthesia ± CT/MRI ± Fistolography
OPERA
S
mall, supercial sinus tracts or wounds may respond to serial
TIVE MANAGEMENT
unroong and curettage; the wound tends to get progressively smaller, and adequate symptomatic relief may be achieved, even if complete healing does not occur. Excision and saucerization to change the shape of the defect from a deep, narrow sinus to a broader wound with a atter surface may also help. Skin graing of the resulting wound can be performed simultaneously or at a future time. Healing rates of 55% to 77% have been reported with this technique.
Observe/local treatment
Superficial
Deep
Excision/curettage (± skin graft)
Excision/curettage of cavity and muscle flap (e.g., gracilis)
FIGURE 41-4 A pr
Computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
oposed algorithm for treatment of patients with an unhealed perineal wound. CT,
212
Unhealed
Perineal Wo
Und
tructures. e coccyx oen must be excised and the lower two seg-
s ments of the sacrum can be safely resected if necessary to provide a tension-free closure of nonbrotic tissue. In wounds that require a bulkier ap, an omental pedicle ap or VRAM may be preferable. e VRAM ap has a success rate between 50% and 100%. 
FIGURE 41-5
left leg r
eep, large cavities will likely require transposition of healthy,
D
A perineal w
eady to be positioned. (Photo courtesy Robert Nesbit, MD.)
ound with a gracilis flap harvested from the
well-vascularized tissue aps to ll the space. Tissue aps generally can be divided into those that do and do not require a laparotomy. A laparotomy is necessary to create omental pedicle aps or rectus abdominis myocutaneous aps. A laparotomy carries the risk of inadvertent enterotomy, repeat pelvic dissection, and an increased risk of hernia. e rectus abdominis ap may have an impact on sub­sequent stoma siting if the need for revision arises. For most of the deep wounds extending into the pelvis, we favor the gracilis ap (Fig.
41-5). e morbidity of a gracilis muscle harvest is low, and the eect
on ambulation or extremity function is minimal. Gracilis aps have a success rate of 20% to 75%. e gracilis is harvested initially with the patient in the lithotomy position, with the muscle insertion division distally. e muscle is then tunneled to the perineal wound and the patient is placed in the prone jackknife position. e perineal wound is carefully inspected and debrided with care to avoid injuring other
SUMMAR
phincter-saving techniques have diminished the number of
S
roctectomies being performed both for IBD and malignancy.
p
onetheless, an unhealed perineal wound remains a problem, with
N
nicant morbidity and impact on quality of life.
sig
Y
Proper preoperative management prior to proctectomy and good
surgical technique provide the best chance of avoiding a UPW.
When a UPW develops, it may respond to patient, nonoperative therapy. Deep, chronically brotic pelvic cavities require debride­ment and the use of a muscle ap such as the gracilis.
g g e
S
u
C
ollie MH, Potter MA, Bartolo DC. Myocutaneous aps promote perineal
healing in inammatory bowel disease. Br J Surg. 2005;92(6):740–741. Genua JC, Vivas DA. Management of nonhealing perineal wounds. Clin Colon
Rectal Surg. 2007;20(4):322–328. Ip B, Jones M, Bassett P, Phillips R. Factors aecting the healing of the
p
erineum following surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013;95(4):252–257.
Menon A, Clark MA, Shatari T, et al. Pedicled aps in the treatment of
n
onhealing perineal wounds. Colorectal Dis. 2005;7(5):441–444.
Pemberton JH. How to treat the persistent perineal sinus aer rectal excision.
Colorectal Dis. 2003;5(5):486–489. Shibata D, Hyland W, Busse P
w
a
nd intraoperative radiation therapy for recurrent carcinoma of the
r
ectum. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6(1):33–37.
e d
S t
ound with gracilis muscle aps following abdominoperineal resection
e
R
a d i n g
, et
al. Immediate reconstruction of the perineal
 M
M
 C D
Edith
Y. Ho, Jeffry A. Katz, and Fabio Cominelli

INTR
ODUCTION
Cr
ohn disease (CD) is a chronic, relapsing, idiopathic inammatory condition that primarily aects the gastrointestinal tract. e severity and location of CD are variable. CD, a transmural inammation of the bowel characterized by skip lesions that may involve any section of the gastrointestinal tract, is sometimes complicated by strictures and stula formation. In about 50% of cases, CD aects the terminal ileum and colon; in 20% of cases, it aects the colon only; and in 30% of cases, it aects the small bowel only. Perianal complications develop in about 20% of persons with CD.
Treatment paradigms for CD are rapidly evolving as newer agents become available. Treatment with 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASA) is no longer recommended, and anti–tumor necrosis factor (TNF) thera­pies are initiated earlier in the course of disease to induce mucosal healing. e primary treatment goal is induction and maintenance of steroid-free remission while minimizing drug toxicity. is target has been associated with a better quality of life and a lower likelihood of requiring hospitalizations or surgery. “Deep remission,” dened as both clinical and endoscopic remission, might become the ultimate therapeutic goal in the future. 
MEDIC
ultiple options exist for the medical treatment of CD. e choice
M of therapy is guided by the ecacy of any given agent in inducing and/or maintaining remission, as well as by the severity and extent of the disease. Serious adverse eects of medical treatment are rare, but risks and benets should be carefully weighed in selecting the appropriate treatment strategy.
5-Aminosalicylates
SA drugs, such as mesalamine and sulfasalazine, are no lon-
5-A ger recommended for the treatment of CD. Sulfasalazine alone has shown moderate benet in treating active disease, but it has not been shown to be eective in maintaining remission. Nevertheless, many physicians prescribe ASA drugs for mild CD because of their low tox­icity, low cost, and familiarity. In particular, mesalamine (Pentasa), a controlled-release formulation of 5-ASA, is a favorite drug for CD involving the small bowel and colon because it releases approximately 50% of 5-ASA in the small intestine and the remaining 50% in the colon. Mesalamine suppositories and enemas are also used for distal le-sided disease. 5-ASA agents have a relatively safe toxicity pro­le. Kidney function may be checked annually because of a low risk of renal insuciency. Interstitial nephritis is considered an idiosyn­cratic reaction and is not dose dependent. Rarely, a hypersensitiv­ity reaction can occur, causing worsening abdominal pain, diarrhea,
AL THERAPIES
or hematochezia, which should prompt discontinuation of the drug. Although many physicians and patients still elect to use 5-ASA, it has not been proved that these agents aect the course of CD. 
Antibiotics
o strong evidence exists to support the use of antibiotics in persons
N with active CD. However, antibiotics may be benecial in treating suppurative disease, perianal complications, or hospitalized patients who have signs of infection. A common practice is to prescribe a 2-week course of ciprooxacin, 500 mg by mouth twice a day, and metronidazole, 500 mg by mouth twice a day. 
ticosteroids
Cor
orticosteroids are highly potent antiinammatory medications
C used to achieve clinical remission in patients with active CD. ey should not be used as long-term therapy because of their adverse eects. Short-term adverse eects include mood disturbances, uid retention, hypertension, and weight gain. Long-term consequences include thinning of skin, poor wound healing, cataracts, diabetes, osteoporosis, adrenal insuciency, and increased risk of infections. Corticosteroids can be administered parenterally, orally, or topically. Severely ill, hospitalized patients with CD benet from intravenous corticosteroids, such as hydrocortisone, 300 mg per day, or methyl­prednisolone, 40 to 60 mg per day. Prednisone is the most commonly used oral corticosteroid, starting at 40 to 60 mg per day, and tapering by 5 to 10 mg every 5 to 7 days once remission is achieved. Enteric­coated budesonide, an analog of conventional corticosteroids, is an excellent and eective alternative for ileal and right-sided colonic CD. Because of its high rst-pass metabolism in the liver, only 10% to 15% of budesonide is systemically bioavailable, thus conferring less toxicity than conventional steroids. Studies have shown that budesonide is eective in inducing remission or delaying relapse for up to 9 months, but evidence for its use in maintaining remis­sion is lacking. e optimal dose to induce remission is 9 mg per day, followed by a 3 mg taper every 4 weeks. Physicians and patients should develop a management plan that aims to maintain steroid-free remission on a long-term basis, which typically includes the use of an immunomodulator or a biologic agent. 
unomodulators
Imm
io
purines (e.g., azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine [6-MP]) are the most common immunomodulators in the treatment of moderate to severe CD disease and are primarily used for the maintenance of remission. Because of their slow onset of action (up to several weeks),
213
214
Medic
al Manage
Ment of cr
ohn
disease
imm
unomodulators are not eective in inducing remission. ere­fore, in patients with active disease, immunomodulators with a more rapid onset of action such as corticosteroids are typically prescribed. e standard dose of azathioprine is 2 to 2.5 mg/kg/day, whereas the dose of 6-MP is 1 to 1.5 mg/kg/day. Azathioprine is a prodrug that is converted to 6-MP, which is then metabolized into an active metabolite, 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN). Excess production of the 6-TGN metabolite can cause myelotoxicity and increased risk of infection. Excess production of the 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP) metabolite can lead to hepatotoxicity. erefore, before starting therapy, thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) enzymatic activity should be checked to assess potential risk for drug sensitiv­ity and toxicity. iopurine is not recommended for patients with a low or undetectable TPMT level. In patients with low to intermediate TPMT activity, the dosage should be reduced, usually by 50%.
No standard method exists for monitoring blood tests. We rec­ommend weekly complete blood cell count and liver function tests for the rst month, then every other week for 1 month, then every 3 months. If the white blood cell count is less than 3000 per mm
3
or if transaminases are greater than three times the upper limits of nor­mal, the dosage should be reduced or the drug should be discontin­ued. One key drug interaction is allopurinol, an inhibitor of xanthine oxidase, which interferes with the metabolism of azathioprine and 6-MP. is drug-drug interaction can elevate plasma levels of 6-TGN, which can suppress bone marrow function. erapeutic drug moni­toring for 6-TGN and 6-MMP are now commercially available. ese tests are particularly useful in patients who did not respond to thio­purine treatment despite an adequate duration and dose of immuno­modulator therapy. 6-TGN levels of greater than 235 pmol/8 × 10 r
ed blood cells correlate with a higher likelihood of response, whereas 6-MMP levels of greater than 5700 pmol/8 × 108 red blood cells cor­relate with a higher likelihood of hepatoxicity.
Before initiating immunosuppressive therapy, patients are screened for latent tuberculosis and chronic hepatitis B. Age-appro­priate vaccinations may be considered prior to initiating immuno­modulators, especially live vaccines, given the risk of reactivation or dissemination in an immunocompromised host. ere is also an increased risk of nonmelanoma skin cancers and a four- to vefold increased risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. erefore, annual skin surveillance is oen recommended along with routine blood work.
Methotrexate, another immunomodulator, is oen used in conjunction with a biologic agent to reduce antibody formation. Although less commonly used as monotherapy for CD, a reasonable amount of placebo-controlled data shows that methotrexate is eec­tive for the induction and maintenance of remission. e dose is 25 mg once weekly administered subcutaneously, which is then lowered to 15 mg aer 8 to 12 weeks if the patient improves. Because metho­trexate is a folate antagonist, it is usually taken with folic acid, at a dose of 1 mg daily. e risk of infection and malignancy is slightly increased. Complete blood cell count and liver function tests are checked regularly. Methotrexate is classied as a category X drug in pregnancy because it has been associated with miscarriage and birth defects. Patients are counseled to use contraception while undergoing therapy and are advised to discontinue the drug for 6 months before planning for conception. 
therapy is the treatment of choice for perianal stulas. Currently, three anti-TNF medications have been approved for the treatment of CD in the United States: iniximab, adalimumab, and certolizumab pegol. Iniximab and adalimumab are approved for the induction and maintenance of remission, but certolizumab has a higher failure rate in inducing remission. Iniximab is administered via intrave­nous infusion, whereas adalimumab and certolizumab are injected subcutaneously. ese agents dier by their chemical structure but share similar adverse eects. e most common include infusion reaction or injection site reactions, which can be addressed easily. Most serious adverse eects include an increased risk of infection and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, especially with exposure to thiopu­rines concurrently or in the past. Anti-TNF monotherapy does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of lymphoma, but it is associated with melanoma. Latent tuberculosis, active hepatitis B, or fungal infections should be ruled out before starting biologic agents. Age-appropriate vaccinations and live vaccines may be initiated prior to starting biologic agents because of the potential risk of reactiva­tion. Patients may be monitored with routine blood work every 3 to 6 months and with annual skin examinations. Commercially avail­able tests to detect therapeutic levels and the presence of antibody toward iniximab and adalimumab can be helpful in persons with a poor response to anti-TNF therapy to determine the optimal dosage, interval of administration, or need to consider an alternative biologic agent.
Another therapeutic option is natalizumab, a humanized mono-
clonal antibody directed against cell adhesion molecule α
α
in
tegrins, which prevents T-lymphocyte adhesion to vascular
4β7
8
cell adhesion molecule–1 and mucosal addressin–cell adhesion mol­ecule–1 (MAdCAM-1), thus downregulating inammation. Natali­zumab was rst shown to be eective in the treatment of multiple sclerosis but has since been shown to be eective in inducing and maintaining remission of moderate to severe CD. Use of this drug has been limited by the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencepha­lopathy (PML), and thus the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has restricted it to patients who have not responded to anti-TNF drugs. Before treatment with natalizumab is initiated, patients must be tested for the JC virus antibody to assess their risk of the develop­ment of PML.
Vedolizumab, a humanized monoclonal immunoglobulin G
antibody, specically binds to integrin α
α
4β1
or α
e agent inhibits adhesion of a gut-specic subset
Eβ7.
but does not inhibit
4β7
of T lymphocytes to MAdCAM-1 but not to vascular cell adhesion molecule–1. Because MAdCAM-1 resides almost exclusively in the gastrointestinal tract, vedolizumab does not aect systemic immune response or aect T-cell migration to the central nervous system and therefore may be the rst gut-specic CD treatment. It does not appear to be associated with risk of PML, which is a signicant advantage compared with natalizumab. e pivotal GEMINI 2 study demonstrated the ecacy and safety of vedolizumab in treating CD, which led to approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in
2014. Many new agents, including ustekinumab and etrolizumab, are in development, and ongoing research continues to expand our rep­ertoire of therapies for CD. 
4β1
an
d
1
Biologic Agents
e introduction of biologic agents has substantially improved the
 care of patients with CD by eectively inducing and maintaining remission and reducing the need for hospitalization and surgery. Monoclonal anti–tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) antibodies are designed to bind to human TNF-α, thereby impairing binding to TNF-α receptor sites and resulting in downregulation of the cyto­kine-driven inammatory response. Multiple studies have shown that anti-TNF agents are eective in inducing and maintaining remis­sion in persons with moderate to severe CD. Additionally, anti-TNF
Combination Thera
e Study of Biologic and Immunomodulator Naïve Patients in
py
Crohn’s disease (SONIC), a single randomized controlled trial, dem­onstrated that combination therapy of immunomodulators and anti­TNF was superior to monotherapy in persons with moderate to severe CD. In this trial, combination therapy of azathioprine and iniximab was more eective than iniximab monotherapy, which, in turn, was more eective than azathioprine alone at maintaining clinical and endoscopic remission at 26 and 54 weeks. It is not clear whether aza­thioprine compounds antiinammatory eects, but it does appear to enhance the response to iniximab by decreasing anti-iniximab
COLON
215
a
ntibodies and increasing iniximab levels. Combination therapy was not associated with a higher risk of serious infections during the trial, and evidence in subsequent studies was insucient to con­clude whether combination therapy increases the risk of opportunis­tic infections or malignancies. Furthermore, the risks and benets beyond 1 year are not known. Expert opinion states that results from SONIC can be extrapolated to adalimumab. Controversy exists about duration of combination therapy and whether combination therapy provides benet for persons who have failed to respond to immuno­modulator therapy. Some patients might elect monotherapy because of a higher value of avoiding any potential risk of serious complica­tions or malignancies compared with an increased chance of induc­ing and maintaining remission. 
PERIANAL
AND FISTULIZING CROHN
DISEASE
P
erianal/perirectal abscess and acute suppuration are indications for surgical drainage with or without placement of setons. Patients with nonsuppurative perianal complications, such as recurrent stulization
Assess disease severity
Mild to
moderate
Moderate to
severe
o
r ssuring, can rst try metronidazole alone or in combination with ciprooxacin, followed by immunosuppressive agents upon resolu­tion of infection. In patients with stulizing disease that is refractory to antibiotics, corticosteroids, or immunomodulators, a series of 5 mg/kg iniximab infusions at 0, 2, and 6 weeks can enhance closure of CD stulae. Continuation of 5 mg/kg iniximab at 8-week inter­vals showed durable benet. 
APPR
OACH TO MANAGEMENT OF
CROHN DISEASE
reatment recommendations depend on disease severity, the extent
T of involvement, and the complexity of the disease. e therapeutic goal is to induce and then maintain clinical remission. is approach is outlined in Figure 42-1. To assess disease severity, two systems commonly used in clinical trials are suitable, including the Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and the Harvey-Bradshaw Index, which is a simplied version of the CDAI. A drop in the CDAI of 100 points corresponds to a drop in the Harvey-Bradshaw Index by 3 points. In general, patients with mild to moderate CD disease (CDAI
Severe to fulminant/
refractory
Budesonide
±5-ASA (PO/PR)
Induction of remissionMaintenance of remission
Response?
Yes
±5-ASA
No
Thiopurine or
methotrexate
Oral
steroids
Response?
Yes
No
Anti-TNF
± thiopurine
Response?
Yes
No
OR OR
Oral steroids + Anti-TNF ± Thiopurine
Response?
Yes
Anti-TNF ± Thiopurine
No
IV steroids
Response?
Yes
Oral steroids + Anti-TNF ± Thiopurine
No
Surgery
Post-operative
prophylaxis
5-ASA or
thiopurine or
anti-TNF
FIGURE 42-1 Appr
rectum; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.
oach to management of Crohn disease by disease severity.
5-ASA, 5-Aminosal
ycilic acid; I V, intravenous; P O, by mouth; PR, per
216
Medic
al Manage
Ment of cr
ohn
disease
50-200)
are ambulatory and able to maintain adequate nutrition without signicant symptoms. Patients with moderate to severe CD disease (CDAI 200-450) have failed to respond to treatment for mild to moderate disease and are dependent on systemic corticosteroids for symptom control. ey present with fever, weight loss, nausea or vomiting, abdominal tenderness, and/or anemia. Severe to fulminant disease (CDAI >450) refers to patients who present with alarming symptoms such as high fevers, persistent vomiting, peritonitis, bowel obstruction, or abscess formation. ey are refractory to conven­tional glucocorticoids or biologic agents. 
SURGER
ost patients with CD require surgery over the course of their dis-
M
Y
ease, and a subset may require multiple surgeries. Except for total colectomy and ileostomy for CD limited to the colon, surgery is rarely curative because CD recurs in most patients within 5 years. e most common indications for surgery are refractory disease that is not responsive to medical therapy or intolerability of the adverse eects of medications. Surgery is also indicated for penetrating and strictur­ing CD causing perforation or bowel obstruction, abscesses not ame­nable to percutaneous drainage, complex perianal or internal stulas, uncontrolled hemorrhage, high-grade dysplasia, or malignancy. 
POST
R
ecurrence of CD disease aer surgery occurs in most patients. Post-
OPERATIVE RECURRENCE
operative recurrence can be dened by endoscopy, symptoms, or the need for another surgery. Because endoscopic recurrence generally precedes clinical symptoms, it is recommended that an endoscopic assessment be performed 6 to 12 months aer surgery to identify recurrence and assess risk. Disease patterns (e.g., jejunal or exten­sive ileal-colonic disease, stulization, and perianal involvement) and patient-specic variables (e.g., a shorter preoperative disease dura­tion or initial presentation requiring surgery, prior surgeries, age younger than 30 years, failure of medical management, and current history of smoking) appear to increase risk. Patients with high-risk features might benet from aggressive and early prophylaxis within 30 days of surgery and continue to receive lifelong therapy. To date, no consensus exists regarding optimal medical strategies for prevent­ing recurrence. Treatment options include 5-ASA, imidazole antibi­otics, azathioprine, 6-MP, and anti-TNF biologic agents. 

SMOKING

CD is more likely to develop in past and current smokers than in persons who have never smoked. Smoking also increases the risk of exacerbations, stulizing and stricturing disease, reduced response to medical therapy, and postoperative recurrence. Persons with CD therefore should stop smoking. 

NUTRITION

Nutritional therapy alone has not been a reliably eective treatment for CD. In general, patients experiencing a CD are can follow a low­residue diet divided into small, frequent meals. Nonabsorbable bers
s
uch as raw vegetables can exacerbate symptoms. Patients in clinical remission can follow a healthy diet that is low in saturated fat and red meat but high in sh and vegetables. Patients with more than 100 cm of diseased or resected ileum experience bile salt malabsorption but not depletion. e large amount of unabsorbed bile salts enter­ing the colon causes choleraic diarrhea, which can be symptomati­cally controlled by bile salt sequestrants such as cholestyramine. In patients with more than 100 cm of terminal ileum that is diseased or resected, the liver is unable to compensate for bile salt losses, and fat malabsorption ensues. In these cases, a low-fat diet supplemented with medium-chain triglycerides (medium-chain triglyceride oil) is recommended. ese patients also may require parenteral replace­ment of vitamin B12. Fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, and E) should be checked and supplemented. Vitamin K status can be assessed by international normalized ratio. In prolonged and severe cases of CD, zinc, chromium, and selenium deciency also may develop, and parental or enteral nutrition may be needed to correct these nutri­tional deciencies.
S
u
g g e
C
heifetz AS. Management of active Crohn disease. JAMA. 2013;309(20):
2150–2158.
Colombel JF, Sandborn WJ, Reinisch W, etal. Iniximab, azathioprine, or
combination therapy for Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(15): 1383–1395.
Ford AC, Sandborn WJ, Khan KJ, et al. Ecacy of biological therapies in
inammatory bowel disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106(4):644–659; quiz 660.
Hanauer SB, Sandborn WJ, Rutgeerts P, etal. Human anti-tumor necrosis fac-
tor monoclonal antibody (adalimumab) in Crohn’s disease: the CLASSIC­I trial. Gastroenterology. 2006;130(2):323–333; quiz 591.
Lichtenstein GR, Feagan BG, Cohen RD, etal. Drug therapies and the risk of
malignancy in Crohn’s disease: results from the TREAT™ Registry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109(2):212–223.
Lichtenstein GR, Hanauer SB, Sandborn WJ, etal. Management of Crohn’s
disease in adults. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(2):465–483; quiz 464, 484.
McLeod RS, Wol BG, Steinhart AH, etal. Risk and signicance of endo-
scopic/radiological evidence of recurrent Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterol- ogy. 1997;113(6):1823–1827.
Osterman MT, Kundu R, Lichtenstein GR, Lewis JD. Association of 6-thio-
guanine nucleotide levels and inammatory bowel disease activity: a me­ta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2006;130(4):1047–1053.
Patel V, Wang Y, MacDonald JK, etal. Methotrexate for maintenance of remis-
sion in Crohn’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;8:CD006884.
Sandborn WJ. Current directions in IBD therapy: what goals are feasible with
biological modiers? Gastroenterology. 2008;135(5):1442–1447.
Sandborn WJ, Colombel JF, Enns R, etal. Natalizumab induction and mainte-
nance therapy for Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(18):1912–1925.
Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Rutgeerts P, etal. Vedolizumab as induction and
maintenance therapy for Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(8): 711–721.
Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Stoinov S, etal. Certolizumab pegol for the treat-
ment of Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(3):228–238.
Sa
nds BE, Anderson FH, Bernstein CN, etal. Iniximab maintenance therapy
for stulizing Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(9):876–885.
Seow CH, B enchimol EI, Griths AM, etal. Budesonide for induction of remis-
sion in Crohn’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(3):CD000296.
Toruner M, Lous EV, Harmsen WS, etal. Risk factors for opportunistic in-
fections in patients with inammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(4):929–936.
S t
e d
e
R
a d i n g
  C
M
C

r
ohn disease can aect any segment of the intestinal tract, and the
C
colon will be involved in approximately half of aicted patients. Crohn disease of the colon can entail disease of the large bowel alone or of the large bowel plus the terminal ileum. e behavior of the dis­ease varies and can be categorized as predominantly inammatory, stricturing, or penetrating. Furthermore, disease of the anal canal or perineum can complicate any of these behavior patterns. Under-
creation of an individualized treatment plan that usually begins with medical therapy but ultimately includes surgery in many patients.
MEDIC
e appropriate treatment of a patient with Crohn disease of the colon
 or ileocolon generally begins with individual or combination medi­cal therapy in the form of antibiotics, 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) compounds, glucocorticoids, immunomodulators, or biologic agents. e 5-ASA compounds and glucocorticoids can be orally or topically delivered, depending on the disease location. e medications are conventionally prescribed in an escalating or “bottom-up” fashion in which the next level of medication is implemented when the disease shows itself to be unresponsive to the current therapy. However, more recent studies suggest that early aggressive or “top-down” treatment might be more eective with quicker and greater control of muco­sal inammation and disease symptoms. Regardless of the medical treatment, surgery is ultimately required in many patients with large bowel disease. e incidence of surgery, however, is lower than that for terminal ileal or small bowel Crohn disease. 
OPERA
e indications for surgery in a patient with Crohn disease are gen-
 erally categorized as failed medical therapy or disease-associated complications. Medication failure can be dened as the persistence of symptoms despite appropriate medical therapy, failure as a result of poor compliance, intolerance of medications, debilitating adverse eects, or concern for potential risks/complications. Disease com­plications can be classied as acute (e.g., abscess, free perforation, hemorrhage, and severe colitis) or chronic (e.g., growth retardation, neoplasia, and obstruction). 
PREOPERA
A
ny patient requiring surgery for large bowel disease requires routine laboratory studies to exclude anemia and electrolyte abnormalities. Assessment of nutrition-related proteins (e.g., albumin, transferrin, and prealbumin) is reserved for a patient with recent poor caloric
AL MANAGEMENT
TIVE INDICATIONS
TIVE CONSIDERATIONS
Scott A.
in
take or substantial weight loss (>10% of the patient’s weight when well). Simple decits such as hemoglobin less than 7. 0 g/dL, hypo­kalemia, and hypomagnesemia should be corrected. Malnutrition secondary to systemic inammatory mediators will not improve with hyperalimentation, but 7 to 10 days of parenteral nutrition should be considered in elective situations if the cause of malnutrition is poor caloric intake. Smoking cessation should be strongly encouraged and supported when appropriate because of the negative impact of smoking on operative morbidity and disease recurrence. Regardless of the setting, a patient who may or will require fecal diversion should undergo marking in at least one abdominal quadrant in an area that is easily visible and remote from bony structures, scars, and creases despite the patient’s position (e.g., lying, sitting, and standing). A patient with anorectal sepsis in whom a proctectomy is planned will usually benet from preliminary drainage of the sepsis.
A patient scheduled for elective surgery should generally undergo endoscopy and selective imaging if these investigative studies have not been performed recently. Colonoscopy is warranted to determine the distribution of disease, but upper endoscopy is usually not nec­essary. Magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography (CT) enterography is performed to evaluate small bowel involvement in a patient with suggestive symptoms. Rectal compliance and anal sphincter function should be assessed if preservation of the rectum and anal canal is considered. e compliance and sphincter strength can be objectively measured using anorectal physiology testing and subjectively assessed by observing distensibility of the rectum with insuation during endoscopy and digital examination. A patient who can retain a 150-mL saline enema for at least 5 minutes should experience minimal problems with urgency or seepage aer an oper­ation that spares the rectum and anal canal.
e colon is responsible for absorption of water and salt from stool, and the majority of this activity occurs in the midgut portion of the large bowel. is physiologic role helps protect patients against dehydration and electrolyte imbalances. Although the large bowel is dispensable and patients undergoing a colectomy have a normal life expectancy, attempts at preservation of the colon are justied. 
OPERA
aboratory, endoscopic, and imaging studies are used to plan the oper-
L ation so that unanticipated ndings are rare. However, patients with large bowel disease must be emotionally prepared for the possibility of a permanent stoma during their lifetime. e incurable nature of the disease causes physicians and surgeons to redirect eorts toward safely restoring a normal quality of life, and many patients equate this goal with avoidance of a permanent stoma. Patient education or experience with a temporary ileostomy oen helps alter a patient’s outlook and enables her or him to appreciate that a permanent stoma does not negatively aect quality of life for most ostomates.
TIVE APPROACH
Strong
217
218
FIGURE 43-1 Retroileal passage of the short colonic limb ensures a
tension-fr
Clinic Center for Medical Art & Photography. Copyright 1998-2016. All Rights Reserved.)
ee colorectal anastomosis. (Reprinted with permission, Cleveland
ManageMent of Cr
ohn Colitis
Disease aecting the ascending colon and transverse colon is also managed with limited resection, but a tension-free anastomosis is best assured by rotating the midgut mesentery counterclockwise to bring the terminal ileum into close proximity of the descending colon. e small bowel will accordingly lie medial to the hindgut mesentery and occupy the right side of the abdomen.
Disease of the transverse colon, descending colon, and sigmoid colon can be treated by either segmental resection with creation of a colorectal anastomosis or a total colectomy with construction of an ileorectal anastomosis. e latter approach is generally preferred, but a more limited resection is favored if the patient is older (>50 years) or has undergone signicant (>50 cm) small bowel resection. In both scenarios, preservation of the ascending colon may signicantly improve the patient’s function because absorptive colonic mucosa is retained. Problems with reach of the colonic segment associated with a limited resection can be overcome by passing the colon through a window created between the superior mesenteric and ileocolic ves­sels in the midgut mesentery (Fig. 43-1).
Disease of the entire colon is best managed with a total colectomy and construction of an ileorectal anastomosis. e anastomosis is created using sutures or stapling instruments in any manner of con­guration (e.g., end-to-end or side-to-end), but an anastomosis to the side of rectum is usually avoided. A hand-sewn end-to-end anasto­mosis can be challenging if a marked discrepancy exists between the diameters of the two lumens. A Cheatle slit along the antimesenteric margin of the terminal ileum can be used to reduce the size dierence (Fig. 43-2), or a side-to-end anastomosis can be created. e method used to construct and congure the anastomosis does not seem to signicantly aect the risk for early complications or later recurrence. 
aparoscopic approach to large bowel Crohn disease is associated
A l with an acceptable conversion rate and is generally favored in the elec­tive setting for a patient undergoing a rst-time operation for uncom­plicated disease. Compared with a conventional open procedure, this laparoscopic approach is associated with reduced postoperative pain, lessened operative morbidity, better cosmesis, and decreased length of stay without an increased risk for disease recurrence. 
OPERA
e surgical options that are used for large bowel Crohn disease include resection with or without fecal diversion. Diversion (i.e., an ileostomy or colostomy) can be temporary or permanent. A temporary ileostomy is used to avoid or protect an anastomosis in a patient with coagulopa­thy, debilitating comorbid conditions, high-dose glucocorticoid usage, or severe malnutrition, as well as someone requiring an operation associated with undrained sepsis, purulent or feculent peritonitis, or excessive blood loss. Unlike in persons with small bowel Crohn dis­ease, strictureplasty is not generally advocated for large bowel strictures because approximately 7% of colonic strictures harbor a malignancy and colonic strictureplasty does not provide better postoperative func­tion or quality of life compared with resection.
Disease of the Colon
C
olonic disease can be managed by segmental resection with creation of a primary anastomosis or by a total colectomy with construction of an ileorectal anastomosis.
Disease that is limited to the ascending colon with or without ter­minal ileum involvement is best treated by resection, but the resultant anastomosis can abut against the second portion of the duodenum and expose the patient to risk of a complex stula involving the duo­denum or retroperitoneum if disease recurs at the ileocolic anasto­mosis. Accordingly, omentum is interposed between the anastomosis and duodenum or the distal resection margin is moved into the mid transverse colon to create separation from the duodenum.
TIVE OPTIONS
Alone
Disease of the Rectum
Di
sease limited to the rectum that requires surgery is usually man­aged with resection of the entire large bowel and creation of an end ileostomy. However, proctectomy alone with construction of a colos­tomy has been advocated by some centers with acceptable recurrence rates. is option is attractive in a patient who would benet from retained water and salt absorption, such as someone who is older (>50 years) or has undergone signicant (>50 cm) small bowel resec­tion. In a highly selected young patient with no history of anoperineal disease, a coloanal anastomosis can be safely performed to avoid a stoma in the short term. However, the patient is at signicant risk for recurrent disease that would necessitate complex reoperative pelvic surgery and creation of a permanent ileostomy. 
Alone
Disease of the Colon and Rectum
Di
sease aecting at least portions of the colon and the entire rectum is typically treated by resection of the entire large bowel and creation of an end ileostomy. e proctectomy is usually performed in an endoanal fashion with excision of the internal sphincter and preser­vation of the external sphincter and muscles of the pelvic oor. ese structures are closed in a layered manner (Fig. 43-3), with the skin le to heal by secondary intention if an anorectal abscess or stula is present. Regardless of the closure technique used, normal healing of the perineal wound occurs in only half of patients, and approxi­mately 25% will demonstrate a persistent wound aer 6 months of follow-up. Supercial wounds will eventually close, as opposed to sinus tracts that extend into the pelvis, which oen require a repeat operation with debridement and use of omental pedicle or muscle aps to achieve healing.
For young patients aicted with proctocolitis who do not have any history or evidence of small bowel or anoperineal disease, a restorative procedure such as a proctocolectomy with creation of an ileal pouch–anal anastomosis is an option. e procedure is usually performed in two or three stages depending on the clinical scenario.
COLON
219
FIGURE 43-2
for Medical Art & Photography. Copyright 1998-2016. All Rights Reserved.)
I
f the disease aects portions of the colon and upper rectum, selected
A Cheatle slit of the terminal ileum facilitates construction of an ileor
patients without signicant small bowel or anoperineal disease can be managed with resection of the colon and upper rectum and creation of an ileal pouch–rectal anastomosis. e ileal pouch measures 10 cm in length, is congured in a J shape, and is joined to the remaining normal rectum near the peritoneal reection. Although the likeli­hood of disease recurrence is relatively high with this procedure, the function is acceptable and the patient can oen avoid a permanent ileostomy during her or his early adult years. 

SPECIAL SITUATIONS

Medications
H
igh-dose glucocorticoid usage has been linked to an increased risk for postoperative complications (e.g., infection and poor healing), and a patient requiring high-dose prednisone (>20 mg daily) should be counseled about the possible need for temporary fecal diversion. e impact of biologic agents on the risk for infectious complications has been argued, but the risk is likely linked to serum levels of the drug that is metabolized at varying patient-dependent rates. Regardless, it is likely advisable to schedule an elective procedure when the patient is due for her or his next scheduled infusion or injection of the agent. 
Abscess
ntra-abdominal abscesses associated with penetrating disease usu-
I ally arise from the le colon. ese abscesses are best managed by parenteral antibiotics plus CT-guided drainage if the abscess mea­sures greater than 3 cm or by aspiration if the abscess is 3 cm or smaller and the patient has been treated with glucocorticoids. Reim­aging is recommended if the patient’s condition worsens or does not improve within 3 to 5 days of treatment onset. A sinogram through the existing drain should be performed every few weeks, followed by
ectal anastomosis.
FIGURE 43-3
endoanal proctectomy. (Reprinted with permission, Cleveland Clinic Center for Medical Art & Photography. Copyright 1998-2016. All Rights Reserved.)
La
(Reprinted with permission,
yered closure of the perineal wound following
Cleveland Clinic Center
repeat CT imaging in all patients at 6 weeks to ensure resolution of the abscess. Whether the patient’s condition is subsequently managed with long-term medical therapy or surgery is the topic of debate and depends on the interplay of multiple factors. 
vere Colitis
Se
A
ny patient with severe colitis should be resuscitated and evaluated for peritonitis with physical examination and for perforation with abdominal imaging (Fig. 43-4). Aer stool studies for Clostridium dicile, lower endoscopy is conducted with minimal insuation.
220
ManageMent of Cr
ohn Colitis
Severe colitis
No
Peritonitis or
perforation
Yes
No
Operation Discharge on medical therapy
FIGURE 43-4
e severity of mucosal inammation is assessed and biopsy speci-
Infliximab Glucocorticoids
Response by day 7 Response by day 3
T
reatment algorithm for severe colitis.
mens are obtained to exclude cytomegalovirus infection. High-dose glucocorticoids are typically started, and the patient is frequently assessed with abdominal examinations and daily abdominal roentgenograms. If the patient shows signs of deterioration or no improvement aer 3 days of therapy, rescue therapy or surgery is recommended. Iniximab is the agent most commonly used for rescue therapy, and the patient should experience improvement within 5 to 7 days. An operation is indicated if rescue therapy fails to resolve disease-related symptoms and signs. In patients with “severe” endoscopic inammation, iniximab is oen used as rst-line therapy instead of glucocorticoids. Regardless the setting, iniximab is not prescribed in a patient in whom severe disease developed while he or she was being treated with immunomodula­tors or biologic agents.
If an operation is warranted, the procedure of choice is a laparo­scopic colectomy with creation of an end ileostomy. e distal tran­sected bowel can be managed in a variety of ways. Intraperitoneal closure of a rectal stump is complicated by dehiscence and an intra­abdominal abscess in approximately 10% of cases. is complication can be avoided by leaving a longer stump that is closed and implanted above the fascia level in the lower abdomen. Dehiscence of the stump with this approach occurs in one quarter of the cases but results in a mucous stula that can be easily managed. Rarely, the stump cannot be closed because the tissue is too fragile. In this instance, a short (5-cm) segment of the transected sigmoid colon is exteriorized. e short seg­ment is amputated and a mucous stula is created aer 7 to 10 days. A denitive operation is planned 6 months later when the patient has recovered and has usually discontinued all medical therapy. 
Severe endoscopic findings
Yes
No
r
equired because the stula is oen symptomatic or at risk for associ-
No
YesYes
ated complications. e diseased large bowel is resected, and the edges of the stomach are excised to healthy tissue and primarily closed. 
Neoplasia
ysplasia and adenocarcinoma can develop in any segment of
D chronically inamed large bowel, and the risk for malignancy is generally estimated at 0.5% per year aer 8 to 10 years of disease symptoms. e risk is greatest in patients with extensive disease, severe disease, or sclerosing cholangitis. Patients in whom at least one-third of the large bowel is aected by disease are surveyed every 1 to 2 years with a colonoscopy that includes targeted biopsies of any suspicious lesions or masses, as well as four-quadrant random biopsies obtained every 10 cm. Strictures should be extensively biopsied, and cytologic brushing should be considered. If the entire bowel at risk cannot be surveyed because of a stricture or atrophy associated with out-of-circuit rectum, prophylactic resection is usually advised if adequate surveillance has not been performed for more than 5 years.
Oncologic resection of the diseased bowel and its lymphatic drain­age basin is recommended for any nding of dysplasia that cannot be endoscopically resected or adenocarcinoma. Continued surveillance is generally suggested for patients with indenite dysplasia and ade­noma-like dysplasia but is debated for unifocal dysplasia arising in at mucosa found during surveillance. Colonic dysplasia or carcinoma in a patient with rectal sparing is usually managed with a colectomy and construction of an ileorectal anastomosis. If the rectum is the site of neoplasia or is inamed, a total proctocolectomy is warranted. 
owth Retardation
Gr
rowth retardation is a disease- or medication-related complication
G seen in prepubescent children aicted with Crohn disease of the large bowel. Surgery can return growth velocity to normal, but catch­up growth is oen incomplete. In some aected children, delayed puberty may compensate for poor growth experienced earlier in life, and signicant growth can still occur. Surgery may have a favorable impact on growth in the short term, but nal height oen remains less than predicted. 
Fistula
Fi
stulas complicating Crohn disease of the large bowel most oen arise
from the transverse colon and target the stomach. Surgery is usually

OUTCOME

A s
egmental colectomy and total colectomy are associated with comparable 30-day operative morbidity rates of approximately 14%. The overall 30-day mortality rate is approximately 0.4% for elective procedures but higher for emergency operations. Although the surgical recurrence rates are similar for the two procedures, patients undergoing a segmental resection exhibit recurrence an average of 4.4 years earlier than those who undergo a total colectomy. Moreover, patients with at least two colonic segments involved by disease tend to do better if they undergo a total colectomy with construction of an ileorectal anastomosis. Fortunately, permanent fecal diversion is required in only a small number (18%) of patients, but the presence of anoperineal disease portends a greater risk.