Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_869_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
36 Мб
Скачать
442
Fig. 43.14 Team and patient installation for pure taTME
Fig. 43.15 Perfect purse string closing the distal rectum
The surgeon works in a seated position between the patient’s legs with one or two assistants who will manipulate the TEO® in order to change its posi­tion during the surgical maneuver (Fig.43.14).
Dissection
Step 1: Closing the Distal Stump of the Rectum Placing a Purse-String Suture
A purse-string suture is placed 1cm distal to the inferior boarder of the tumor (Fig.43.15), in order to prevent fecal and cancer cell contamination and to avoid colonic insufation. The closure must be perfect to avoid insufation of the proximal rec­tum and colon (Fig.43.16). The distal rectum is then irrigated copiously with a povidone-Iodine® solution in an attempt to sterilize the distal anorectum.
J. Leroy et al.
Fig. 43.16 Purse string minimum 1 centimeter under the tumor
Step 2: Posterior Rectal Space Opening
The rectal mucosa is initially incised from a 10 to a 2 o’clock position (Fig.43.17), and then a full­thickness posterior rectotomy is performed (Fig.43.18). The plane of dissection begins just posteriorly to the rectal fascia and is developed up to the promontory along a plane anterior to the sacral fascia in the posterior midline. The pneumo-dissection performed using insufation facilitates the identication of this space (Fig.43.19). In our experience and in the major­ity of cases, the dissection was performed behind the presacral fascia. Recently, we have success­fully dissected along a plane between the presa­cral fascia and the propria fascia. In so doing, this opens the plane just above their fusion point (i.e., Waldeyer’s ligament) leading to entry in the “holy plane” (Fig. 43.1), as described by RJ Heald [2]. This embryonic plane not only pro­vides oncologically precise but also allows for an avascular and thus safe plane which does not encroach upon the pelvic autonomic nerves. As the dissection progresses cephalad beyond the sacral promontory, the retroperitoneal space becomes exposed just inferior to the aortic bifur­cation. In the pure NOTES taTME technique, the dissection can be continued from down-to-up by advancing the TEO® rectoscope forward and lat­erally reaching the level of the sacral promontory. Anterior and medial retraction of the mesorectum is done via the transanal approach by using the TEO® platform’s access channel as a circular retractor that “stents open” the operative eld.
ab
43 Pure NOTES Transanal TME
Fig. 43.17 Drawing of the incision under the purse string (A posterior, B anterior)
Fig. 43.18 Full-thickness rectotomy from 2 to 10
Fig. 43.19 Retrorectal and presacral dissection with
monopolar spatula. TEO® is pushed slowly to open the space without another retractor
Step 3: Cranial and Lateral Progression of the Dissection
If the plane initially entered is not the “holy plane” but the presacral space just posterior to the presacral fascia, care must be taken to avoid dis­secting too posteriorly, which can result in injury to the autonomic plexus and presacral veins. While entering the presacral space and not the
443
Fig. 43.20 Left lateral dissection, sliding along the lat­eral side wall fascia (white structure). Nerve branch cross­ing the space
“holy plane,” it becomes more challenging as progress is made more cranially and laterally.
As the lateral dissection progresses, the 15cm length TEO® rectoscope is advanced to a posi­tion between the rectum and the side wall fascia. This will slowly expose the middle rectal vessels and the autonomic branches of the lateral plexus (including the nervi erigentes) crossing the lat­eral side wall pelvic fascia to reach the lateral side of the rectum and mesorectum (Figs.43.20 and 43.21). It is important to note that until this point in the pure NOTES taTME dissection, the abdominal cavity has not opened as the perito­neal reection has not been violated. In this tech­nique of dissection, the pressure of the CO
gas is
2
not the principle factor in creating the operative exposure, but it is rather the retraction of the TEO® rectoscope shaft. The CO
is only used
2
with a low pressure (12–15mmHg) – with the purpose of clearing the eld of view. Landmarks for doing a safe lateral pelvic dissection is to fol­low the medial side of the side wall pelvic fascia, which appears white. In so doing, iatrogenic injury to anatomical structures including the lat­eral aspects of the inferior hypogastric plexus can be avoided (Fig.43.22).
Step 4: Extending the Perirectal Dissection Anteriorly
Once the posterior and lateral dissection of the mesorectum has been completed, the remainder of the distal rectal transection is performed ante­riorly from a 2 o’clock to a 10 o’clock position
444
J. Leroy et al.
Fig. 43.21 Right lateral dissection. Visualization of nerves plexus branches
Fig. 43.22 Right side wall fascia (white). Resistant structure which protect laterally the inferior hypogastric plexus
(Figs.43.17 and 43.23). The rectal wall must be completely dissected to enter into the rectovagi­nal plane in female patients (Fig.43.24) and the rectoprostatic plane in males (Fig. 43.25). Dissection is developed until the level of the peri­toneal reection is reached.
Fig. 43.23 Full-thickness anterior rectotomy from 10 to 2
Fig. 43.24 Female patient: Denonvilliers’ fascia (white).
Douglas pouch visible
Step 5: Dividing the Anterior Peritoneal Reflection and Opening the Abdominal Cavity
This maneuver reveals the rectouterine pouch (Douglas’ pouch) in women (Fig.43.26) and the recto-vesicular pouch in men (Fig.43.27). As in transabdominal resections, this step is more dif­cult in men. In men with anterior lesions, the dual-layered Denonvilliers’ fascia is kept on the
Fig. 43.25 Male patient: Denonvilliers’ fascia anterior, rectum posterior, and Douglas pouch
43 Pure NOTES Transanal TME
445
Fig. 43.26 Female patient: opening the Douglas pouch
Fig. 43.27 Male patient: opening of Douglas pouch
mesorectum (to assure oncologic clearance), and care is taken to prevent urogenital tract injuries (prostate, seminal vesicles, and urethra). For these steps, the TEO® platform provides excel­lent exposure by retracting the fasciae, and this facilitates precise and safe dissection.
Step 6: Proceeding with the Dissection Toward the Root of the Mesorectum and the Retroperitoneal Abdominal Space
Once the anterior peritoneal reection has been opened, the rectum is gently distracted down­ward to expose and divide the lateral attach­ments of the root of the mesorectum (Fig.43.28). Next, the rectum is pushed cephalad into the
Fig. 43.28 Proximal lateral division on left of the root of the mesorectum
abdominal cavity through the peritoneal entry point along the pouch of Douglas. It is at this moment that the patient is positioned in steep Trendelenburg to obtain retraction of the bowel in the upper part of the abdominal cavity above the pelvic brim, to better expose the upper aspect of the pelvis. The pressure of the intra­abdominal CO
gas completes the retraction of
2
the small bowel maintaining it away from the pelvis and operative eld, as during classical laparoscopy. Pushing the rectum anteriorly results in tenting of the root of the mesorectum (Fig. 43.29) at the level of the promontory exposing the lateral peritoneal attachments of the mesorectum we divide to open the retroperi­toneal space.
Step 7: Reaching the Root of the Inferior Mesenteric Vessels
The TEO® long rectoscope (20 cm length) is now utilized. The shaft is advanced behind the rectum toward the promontory by dissecting planes posteriorly with a monopolar spatula elec­trode. Care is taken to prevent injury to presacral veins posteriorly, to the mesorectal envelope medially, and to pelvic nerves, ureters, and distal branches of iliac vessels coursing laterally. With anterior retraction of the root of the mesorectum, the retroperitoneal space anterior to the aorta is entered, with care to preserve the preaortic fascia and hypogastric plexuses (Figs.43.30 and 43.31). As stated previously, exposure of the space is maintained by the circular TEO® retractor (Fig.43.32), which allows for the dissection to be
446
Fig. 43.29 Root of the mesorectum tented anteriorly exposing the anterior aspect of the promontory
J. Leroy et al.
Fig. 43.32 Vison of a 20 cm TEO® in intra-abdominal position during a pure taTME (view through a right iliac fossa trocar, before doing diverting stoma)
Fig. 43.30 Male patient: 20cm TEO® pushed above the promontory inside the retroperitoneal space, in front of the aorta
Fig. 43.31 Female patient: 20cm TEO® pushed above the promontory inside the retroperitoneal space, in front of the aorta
Fig. 43.33 Dissection origin IMA
extended toward the root of the sigmoid mesen­tery, following the dorsal aspect of the vascular sheet of the inferior mesenteric vessels. The ret­roperitoneal dissection of the sigmoid mesentery is continued to reveal the origin of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) (Fig.43.33). This step may be facilitated by the division of the medial and lateral peritoneal attachment of the sigmoid colon and the ventral lifting of the mesentery. For this step, longer instruments (43cm) are helpful to achieve better operative angles and improved operative ergonomics.
Step 8: Dividing the Inferior Mesenteric Vessels and the Sigmoid Mesentery
For oncological purposes (as well as to improve conduit reach), a high ligation of the IMA is the standard approach (Fig. 43.34). Otherwise, for early tumor and benign lesions, a distal division of the superior rectal artery may be performed [1517]. Distal or high divisions of the inferior mesenteric vessels are performed after sealing
43 Pure NOTES Transanal TME
Fig. 43.34 Clipping IMA trunk before division
447
Fig. 43.36 Division of the mesosigmoid
Fig. 43.35 Dissection and division IMV with a sealing
device
[with THUNDERBEAT™ Type S (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) or with LigaSure™ (Covidien, New Haven, CT, USA)] or after clipping. Division of the IMV (Fig. 43.35) is done afterward, and the left colic artery is also divided after high tie of the IMA.
Division of the sigmoid mesentery (Fig.43.35) is performed intra-abdominally after selecting the best segment (summit of sigmoid loop). One can divide the mesentery rst or divide the sigmoid colon rst with a linear stapler introduced into the 12mm operative channel of the TEO® faceplate (stapler access can be obtain removing the sili­cone obturator). Division of the mesentery is per­formed with a sealing device (Fig.43.36). At the end of the division, we observe the quality of the vascularization with visual comparison of the color; alternatively indocyanine green (ICG) can be used to assess bowel perfusion (Fig.43.37). So as to more easily divide the mesentery, it is useful to retract (by a pushing maneuver) all the rectum mesorectum laterally toward the right iliac fossa.
Fig. 43.37 Control of the vascularization with ICG®
When the division of the sigmoid mesentery has been completed, the distal extremity of the rectum is grasped and pulled slowly through the TEO® rectoscope; a transanal extraction is then performed at the same time (Fig.43.38). The specimen is gently exteriorized, with care to maintain the integrity (Fig.43.39) and qual­ity of the mesorectal envelope, the vascular pedicle, and the mesenteric lymphadenectomy (Fig. 43.40); the proximal margin and distal limit of the resection are determined as well (Fig.43.41).
Next, the now transanally exteriorized sigmoid colon is divided extracorporeally. To perform this, a suitable portion of sigmoid colon (demonstrating adequate vascularity) is prepared and then divided with a linear Endo-GIA stapler (Fig. 43.42). A suture is xed on the bowel maintain its orientation.
448
Fig. 43.38 Transanal exteriorization of the specimen
J. Leroy et al.
Fig. 43.39 Macroscopic view of rectal specimen
Then, the pelvis is explored and cleansed with irri­gation through the anus. A LoneStar™ retractor is positioned transanally to expose the anorectum. Intra-abdominal inspection (e.g., to assess for active sites of bleeding) is done after the TEO® operating
Fig. 43.40 Control of the quality of oncologic resection and vascular package
Fig. 43.41 Resection: distal margin
platform has been reintroduced. If required, further mobilization of the sigmoid and even descending colon can be done at this time.
43 Pure NOTES Transanal TME
449
Fig. 43.42 Division of the sigmoid with a linear stapler Fig. 43.43 Exposure with LoneStar® retractor and prep-
aration of a side-to-end manual low colorectal anastomo­sis with separated stiches
Step 9: Construction of Low Colorectal or Coloanal Anastomosis
The anastomosis may be an end-to-end or a side­to- end colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. It can be stapled or hand-sewn, but it may depend on the clinical scenario. The side-to-end hand-sewn anas­tomosis is the easier technique to perform and is done utilizing either the TEO® platform or the
pneumoperitoneum. The catheter on the anvil’s spike is removed, and the spike is grasped with the aid of Kelly forceps. The arm portion of the circu­lar stapler is inserted and mated to the anvil, before performing the anastomosis and controlling it endoscopically.
LoneStar® Retractor (Fig. 43.43) depending the level of the anastomosis. Interrupted sutures (pre­ferred) or a running suture may be used.

Postoperative Care

In a side-to-end stapled anastomosis, a colos­tomy is performed just distal to a well- vascularized segment of bowel along the antimesenteric border in preparation for the anastomosis [9]. The spike of the anvil is delivered through this colostomy and brought out through the antimesenteric side of the proximal colon. The conduit is then transected
Patients should follow an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol, and standard analgesia is offered (paracetamol and oral opi­ates). Sips of uid are given on the evening of surgery and diet started the next day. Early patient
mobilization is encouraged. with a single ring of a linear stapling device, just distal to the anvil and proximal to the colostomy. A purse-string suture is placed around the spike of
Discussion
the anvil. A catheter is attached over the spike of the anvil to be used as a handle to prevent exces­sive retraction of the anvil cranially into the abdo­men. The anvil is pushed back into the pelvis and the short TEO ® is reinserted transanally. The pel­vis is inspected for bleeding, and the orientation of the proximal bowel is controlled to ensure that it is not twisted. A purse-string suture is placed to close the orice around the spike of the anvil. Prior to cinching the purse-string suture, a drain is briey advanced into the pelvis to evacuate any residual
Why Pure taTME?
Pure NOTES transanal rectal extirpation has
attracted our attention. By providing superior
visualization and more accurate distal TME dis-
section (particularly in early rectal cancer), such
an approach may improve clinical, oncological,
and functional outcomes. In particular, a no-scar
radical resection signicantly improves healing
and recovery after surgery. Thus, not only can
patients return to full activity and function
450
J. Leroy et al.
post- operatively, but, when indicated, they can receive adjuvant therapy without signicant delay.
Following the Japanese experience in retroperi­toneal oncologic right and left colectomies [18] and the experience of pure retroperitoneal lymph­adenectomies in gynecologic cancers [19, 20], our center has replicated these approaches for the rec­tum via a transanal access. Our experimental and clinical experience concluded the feasibility and safety of pure NOTES taTME.In the literature, most of papers report results of hybrid techniques with transanal rectal dissection completed from below, but not above the level of the S2 vertebra [2130]. Only a few teams have performed pure NOTES taTME [31, 32]. As previously stated, even with proper expertise, only selected patient will benet of this advanced procedure.
Why TEO® Platform?
The TEO® platform is not a mere “point-of­access” device equitable to a trocar. When Gerhard Buess develop the revolutionary TEM apparatus, he proposed an automatic gas distension to expose the rectal cavity [13]. Doing only full-thickness excision of rectal neoplasia, he did not, at that time, envision the advantage of using the device’s rectoscope as “tunneling machine” to provide retraction in a circular manner that would enable more radical, en bloc resections. In our opinion, such rigid platforms (TEM or TEO®) provide the advantage to expose the plan of dissection, and CO2 gas ow aids in clearing the operative eld. The TEO® scope can be navigated around the rec­tum and, subsequently, in the retroperitoneal space, stenting the operative eld open, in a simi­lar fashion to how the cap is used to do so by inter­ventional endoscopists during EMR (Fig.43.8).
Currently at our center, we are exploring the possibility to eventually connect the TEO® plat­form to a foot pedal or a voice-piloted robotic arm to improve the ergonomic and functional arrangement, allowing a surgeon to operate more autonomously, expeditiously, and without the need for a skilled assistant. Combined, these fac­tors can reduce the cost of the procedure.
Why a Retroperitoneal Approach?
Decades of experience with conventional, up-to­down TME taught us that the dissection of the
rectum and sigmoid colon is an operation predi­cated upon embryological planes –.
even along the retroperitoneum. All critical blood vessels and relevant autonomic nerves lie within the retroperitoneal space. The main chal­lenges for TME are dissection along this plane, whereby preservation of vital vascular and nerve structures is paramount during the dissection. Today, the pure NOTES down-to-up transanal rectosigmoid dissection is now well standardized at our center and select centers worldwide. With appropriate training and experience, this retro­peritoneal approach, particularly for the manage­ment and control of the vascular pedicles, appears to be optimal [6, 8, 9]. Conrmatory data reported by other experts subsequent to our published ndings are also available [33].
Is Mobilization of Splenic Flexure Necessary?
For most authors, mobilization of splenic exure is a step of TME’s procedure. Increasingly, how­ever, there is a growing consensus not to perform mobilization systematically and thus leading most experts to recommend a case-by-case selec­tion. It is one of the techniques available to obtain adequate length, especially for construction of an ultra-low anastomosis, but has little direct effect on blood supply, and splenic exure mobilization can increase operative and postoperative morbid­ity. If it is necessary for anatomic reasons (spe­cically, to gain reach) or because it is otherwise deemed necessary, transanal exure mobilization is, in fact, feasible with the adaption of long instruments– as John Marks has demonstrated to be successful [34]. An operative berscope can be useful as an adjunct, as well [9], and in this manner, pure NOTES taTME including splenic exure mobilization is possible.
Teaching and Training
TME procedure for rectal cancer remains a techni­cally demanding operation, whether completed in the open, laparoscopic, robotic, and now via the transanal approach. Through experience, and since the inception of laparoscopic digestive surgery, a standardized methodology of these procedures is essential to reproduce and to teach surgeons so that they may gain prociency. Thus, a new procedure
43 Pure NOTES Transanal TME
451
should be mastered and perfectly understood before it is taught to delegate surgeons. Today, substantial experience with pure NOTES taTME (in highly selected patients) has been realized and, at our cen­ter, has become standardized. Most recently, a pure NOTES taTME for curative-intent rectal resection was completed in 2h (female patient, T2 mid-rectal tumor, long sigmoid loop, with a virgin abdomen (Figs.43.4, 43.5, and 43.6). Teaching taTME is not easy. Sam Atallah (2017) demonstrates perfectly in a recent paper how difcult it can be (35). Training in fresh cadaveric model seems for us the best approach. Some advanced programs have been developed worldwide [3537].

Conclusion

Performing a pure oncologic transanal TME without abdominal scars is feasible. This con­cept is based mainly on the objective of provid­ing surgical cure for patients with rectal cancer.
Patient selection is highly important. The best indications for this approach are currently for early rectal cancers of the mid/high rectum, with or without neoadjuvant therapy. The pure NOTES taTME can also be applied for rectal extirpation of carpeting benign rectal tumors for which a complete endoscopic excision is impossible. In our primary experience, a diverting stoma may be avoided in patients in whom there is no neoadju­vant radiochemotherapy.
Its principle limitations seem to be locally advanced rectal cancer and obesity.
Up-to-down or down-to-up TME are surgeries of embryological planes. Before doing down-to­ up pure taTME, it is necessary to memorize the technique of up-to-down to perform easier dissec­tion of embryological planes as described above.

References

1. Miles WE. A method of performing abdomino-
perineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon. Lancet. 1908;2:1812–3.
2. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD.The mesorectum
in rectal cancer surgery–the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg. 1982;69(10):613–6.
3. Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Nelson H, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. Laparoscopic colectomy for can­cer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246(4):655–62. discussion 662–4.
4. Heald RJ. A new solution to some old problems: transanal TME.Tech Coloproctol. 2013;17(3):257–8.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-0984-0. Epub 2013
Mar 22.
5. Sylla P, Rattner DW, Delgado S, Lacy AM. NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endo­scopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1205–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00464-010-0965-6. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
6. Leroy J, Barry BD, Melani A, Mutter D, Marescaux J.No-scar transanal total mesorectal excision: the last step to pure NOTES for colorectal surgery. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(3):226–30. discussion 31.
7. Leroy J, Cahill RA, Perretta S, Forgione A, Dallemagne B, Marescaux J.Natural orice translu­menal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) applied totally to sigmoidectomy: an original technique with survival in a porcine model. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(1):24–30.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0102-y. Epub
2008 Sep 24. PMID: 18814015.
8. Leroy J, Diana M, Barry B, Mutter D, Melani AG, Wu HS, et al. Perirectal Oncologic Gateway to Retroperitoneal Endoscopic Single-Site Surgery (PROGRESSS): a feasibility study for a new NOTES approach in a swine model. Surg Innov. 2012;19(4):345–52. https://doi.
org/10.1177/1553350612452346. Epub 2012 Jul 1.
PMID: 22751618.
9. Dapri G, Marks JH, editors. Surgical Techniques in Rectal Cancer, Chapter 28, Joel Leroy, Usmaan Hameed, Ntourakis Dimitrios, and Frédéric Bretagnol. Pure Transanal Laparoscopic TME without Abdominal Laparoscopy. Springer Japan 2018. https://doi.org/
10.1007/978-4-431-55579-7_28.
10. Marks J, Mizrahi B, Dalane S, Nweze I, Marks G.Laparoscopic transanal abdominal transanal resec­tion with sphincter preservation for rectal cancer in the distal 3cm of the rectum after neoadjuvant ther­apy. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(11):2700–7. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s00464-010-1028-8. Epub 2010 Apr 23.
11. Marks JH, Myers EA, Zeger EL, Denittis AS, Gummadi M, Marks GJ. Long-term outcomes by a transanal approach to total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(12):5248–57.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5597-7. Epub
2017 Jun 22. PMID: 28643051.
12. Zorron R, Phillips HN, Wynn G, Neto MP, Coelho D, Vassallo RC. “Down-to-up” transanal NOTES Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: pre­liminary series of 9 patients. J Minim Access Surg. 2014;10(3):144–50. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-
941.134878. PMID: 2501333.
13. Buess G, Kipfmüller K, Ibald R, Heintz A, Braunstein S, Gabbert H, Junginger T. Transanal