Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_869_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
36 Мб
Скачать
20 Indications forBenign Disease oftheRectum
199
Ultimately, this resulted in lower leak rates and thus improved clinical outcomes [6]. For this reason, a modied two-stage or three-stage pro­cedure is preferred for UC.Nowadays, the col­ectomy is often completed laparoscopically with reduced postoperative complications, reduced incidence of clinically signicant adhe­sions, and preserved fecundity [7]. Due to the relative absence of adhesions with this approach, the completion proctectomy can be done via the Pfannenstiel incision or, alternatively, with a combination of a single-port introduced via the ileostomy site and a TAMIS platform, which provides a minimally invasive option. There are a number of reasons why the transanal approach for completions proctectomy for UC might be advised:
1. The Ta platform enables a tailored transection of the distal rectum, thus assuring a precise length of the rectal cuff and thus avoiding the risk of a retained rectum.
2. Laparoscopic cross-stapling of the distal rec­tum has been shown difcult resulting in too long cuffs and the necessity to use multiple staple cartridges, thereby increasing the risk for anastomotic leakage [8].
3. Using the TAMIS technique, the difculty of the double stapling is obviated and is replaced by a single-stapled (double purse-string) anas­tomosis [9].
4. The best plane of dissection is still being debated. The TME plane is an avascular plane and surgeons are used to do this for rectal can­cer. In order to avoid nerve injuries, most IBD surgeons would do a “bad” TME anteriorly staying close to the rectum anteromedially. A possible drawback of the techniques is the relatively large pelvic cavity that remains, which cannot be adequately lled with the pouch, resulting (hypothetically) in a larger presacral cavity. This may prevent a potential anastomotic leak from sealing, and it could create an opportunity for proximal small bowel to become entrapped posterior to the pouch. Alternatively, a close rectal dissection can be applied, which hold the dissection perimeter away from autonomic nerves, and, keeping the surrounding “cushion of mesen-
tery” in situ, avoids a wide pelvic cavitation and limits extra-pelvic space that can be prob­lematic. Furthermore, it is suggested that by preserving the mesorectum and its nerves, a greater awareness of pouch lling is achieved compared to removing the mesorectum, prob­ably due to different proprioception provided by proprioceptors that are intrinsic to the mesorectum itself [10]. It should be noted that top-down dissection close to the rectal muscle tube and especially deep within the pelvis is difcult because of lack of exposure due to the mesorectal fat. In contrast, bottom-up dissec­tion along the muscle tube of the rectum using either the electric hook or vessel sealing devices is relatively easy.
5. The Ta approach allows the pouch anastomo­sis to be completed with a single-stapled con­struction, and this obviates the need for a double-stapled technique, which is associated with problematic intersecting staple lines and the “dog ears” on both sites of the circular anastomosis [8, 9].
6. Combining the Ta bottom-up approach with single-port top-down proctectomy via the stoma site, abdominal access trauma is mini­mized, and the requirement for an incision for the purpose of extraction or pouch creation is avoided (Fig.20.1).
Technique
Preparation: Patients are managed periopera­tively in an enhanced recovery program. Patients are positioned in the Lloyd Davis position on a short beanbag. The right arm is tucked and posi­tioned alongside the body. The rectum is washed out with an iodine solution. Prophylactic antibi­otics are administered.
Procedure Described for a Single-Team Procedure
Step I. The ileostomy is dissected and provision-
ally closed with a running suture to prevent stool spillage. A single-port laparoscopic plat­form (GELPOINT Advanced Access Platform, Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA) is placed in the stoma site. At the
200
Fig. 20.1 Transabdominal and transanal single-port plat­forms in place
W. A. Bemelman
then positioned. Using blunt retractors the dentate line is exposed. The level of transec­tion is marked +/–3cm proximal to the den­tate line to guarantee a remaining rectal cuff of +/–1cm after the double purse- string stapled ileoanal anastomosis. The TAMIS platform GelPOINT® Path Transanal Access Platform, Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA, is inserted with two 10mm cannu­las in the gel cap, as well as a valveless 8mm trocar to allow for operation of the AirSeal® Insufation System (ConMed, Inc., Utica, NY, USA). Insufation pressures are set on 15mm Hg. In case of combined laparoscopy and TAMIS, the pressure settings must be increased to 20 mmHg because of the com­petitive abdominal pressure. Using the elec­trocautery hook, the bowel wall is circumferentially transected, with care to assure that the transection of the bowel wall is full- thickness and circular (Fig.20.2).
Unlike the approach to taTME for cancer, the rectal lumen is not closed, because in this setting the rectum is blind-ending and because it is thoroughly cleansed with iodine solution. Next, dissection is carried out in close proxim­ity to the rectum using electrocautery or ultra­sonic dissection. Care should be taken to maintain a plane near to the rectal muscular tube and to avoid an outward extension of this
fascial level, releasing incisions are often made to increase exposure to the abdominal cavity. After establishing pneumoperitoneum, adhesions and the length of the rectal stump is assessed. The proctectomy is started bottom­up, in order to prevent an early rendezvous with the top-down dissection, because rendez­vous between TAMIS and laparoscopy means less exposure working via the TAMIS, bot­tom-up approach.
Step II. A perianal block is injected at 3 and 9
o’clock positions using 10 ml of an amide local anesthetic (such as bupivacaine), with 5ml on either site to make the external sphinc­ter muscle relax. The Lone Star Retractor (Cooper Surgical, Inc., Trumbull, CT, USA) is
Fig. 20.2 Transection rectal wall full thickness
20 Indications forBenign Disease oftheRectum
Fig. 20.3 Close rectal dissection
plane, with entry into the mesorectal fat plane (Fig. 20.3). The dissection next proceeds as far as possible avoiding prematurely opening the pouch of Douglas, because the moment the connection is established with the abdomi­nal cavity, the exposure of the bottom-up dis­section diminishes. If connection is made, the top-down dissection is started.
Step III. With the single-port platform inserted at
the stoma site, pneumoperitoneum and visual­ization of the abdominal cavity is established laparoscopically. The procedure is simplied when an additional 5mm trocar is inserted in the left lower quadrant, which can be used at the end of the operation to insert a pelvic drain. The rectal stump is identied, and using the ultrasonic vessel sealing device, the “top­down” close rectal proctectomy is initiated. Often, the rendezvous can be made with the bottom-up dissection quite rapidly (Fig.20.4). The specimen can be extracted either transa­nally or via the stoma site.
Step IV. The mesentery of the small bowel is fully
mobilized over the pancreatic head and duo­denum to obtain maximal length. Transverse incisions are made over the anterior and poste­rior mesentery in order to increase pouch reach. This can be done best with the electro­cautery hook.
201
Fig. 20.4 Transabdominal view on the rendezvous with the bottom-up dissection
Fig. 20.5 Exteriorized terminal ileum taking the connect­ing vessels to the inner arcade to increase length
Step V. Pouch creation. The terminal ileum is
exteriorized via the Alexis ring of the single­port platform. If there is still not enough reach, the connecting vessels to the arcade of the ter­minal ileum can be ligated (Fig.20.5). Using linear staplers a pouch of 10–15 cm can be constructed. The redundant efferent loop is removed with a linear stapler and oversewn with a running suture to completely incorpo­rate the blind loop into the pouch to avoid future blind loop syndrome. An anvil is placed in the base of the pouch and xed with a purse string. The size of the circular stapler depends on the diameter of the anus and the relative length of the remaining rectal cuff. If the cuff is relatively long, a larger diameter stapling device can be chosen.
Step VI. Purse-string creation of the rectal cuff.
Using a monolament 0-Prolene or equiva-
202
lent, the purse string is made taking care to create symmetric bites and to not have either too much or too little bowel wall in the purse string. The muscular layer must be incorporated.
Step VII. Under laparoscopic control the pouch is
positioned in the pelvis without rotation and without herniation of small bowel beneath the mesentery. Transanally, a long clamp is advanced to grab the tip of the anvil and pull the tip of the anvil through the anal purse string. With graspers the peritoneum and the mesorectal fat is positioned alongside the pouch to facilitate a smooth advancement of the pouch in the pelvis. The anvil is mated to the arm portion of the circular stapler. The stapler is closed and red. Typically, the rectal donut is quite thick as a result of the double purse-string single-stapling technique. Having pneumoperi­toneum the anastomosis is checked for leaks (reverse air leak test). It might be useful to rein­force the anastomosis with interrupted or run­ning suture. A pouch drain (Chap. 32) is inserted in the pouch for decompression. In our unit, it is a common practice not to defunction the ileoanal anastomosis, accepting a leak rate of ~10–15%.
Step VIII. Via the single-port access platform, a
pelvic drain is positioned after removal of the additional 5 mm trocar. The position of the mesentery and small bowel is checked. The single-port platform is removed and the stoma site is closed in layers. The skin is closed with a monolament purse string (Fig.20.6).
The nasogastric tube is removed upon case completion. The pelvic drain is removed after 48h. The suprapubic catheter is clamped in the following days after surgery, and if there is no retention after voiding, the catheter is removed. Patients are allowed to have a liquid diet until the pouch drain is removed at day 6. C-reactive pro­tein is measured at day 4 and day 7. If there is any indication of anastomotic leakage being clinical symptoms or elevation of CRP at day 7, a CT scan with oral and transanal contrast is per­formed. If a leak is identied radiographically, the patient must be taken back to theater and an
W. A. Bemelman
Fig. 20.6 Final result of double single-port TAMIS proc­tectomy and pouch
ileostomy fashioned; an Endo-SPONGE is inserted transanally via the anastomotic dehis­cence in the septic cavity [11]. Typically, one or two Endo-SPONGE exchanges are necessary to have a clean cavity over a time period of a week in order to resuture the anastomotic defect in the following week. Using this protocol, we have been able to close all ileoanal pouch leaks within 3weeks after diagnosis [12].
If the pouch has been defunctioned primarily for any reason, one should monitor the plasma CRPlevel, which can help elucidate a silent leak. In addition, the anastomosis is routinely checked endoscopically within 2–4weeks after surgery. If there is a silent leak, Endo-SPONGE-assisted early closure of the anastomosis is still feasible.
Preliminary Results
De Buck etal. [13] compared a cohort of nearly 100 Ta pouches to conventional laparoscopic pouches in a three tertiary referral center study.
20 Indications forBenign Disease oftheRectum
203
It was demonstrated that the odds for postopera­tive complications were 0.52 times lower for the Ta pouch patients compared to the patients who had undergone a conventional laparoscopic pouch. This nding was primarily attributed to reduction in surgical site infections. Ta pouches therefore seem to be a safe and promising alter­native for conventional laparoscopic pouches, but long- term data are still awaited with respect to functional outcomes.
Ta Redo Surgery forPouch Dysfunction
Pouch dysfunction is a serious long-term compli­cation of this restorative procedure. Causes are often multifactorial and can be medical or surgi­cal in origin. Careful multidisciplinary assess­ment of the pouch is therefore mandatory to nd the correct cause of the problem and decide on the appropriate therapy. Cross-sectional imaging and joint endoscopic assessment of the pouch are essential in decision-making.
pouch advancement – that is, excising the retained rectum and bringing down the pouch to an appropriate cuff size (Fig.20.7).
(c) Redundant efferent loop of S-pouch.
S-pouches have an efferent loop (Fig.20.8). This loop should not be longer than 2 cm, because otherwise there is a risk of kinking of the efferent loop causing evacuatory dys­function. When the dysfunction from evacu­ation becomes chronic, the pouch enlarges and decompensates, as it is unable to build sufcient pressure to overcome the outlet resistance. If the pouch is not too large, the efferent loop can be shortened and a new hand-sewn anastomosis made. In case the pouch is already too large, probably the over­all size of the pouch needs to be corrected as well (Fig.20.9).
(d) Mega-pouch: Mega-pouches (Fig.20.9) can
develop as result of chronic outlet obstruc­tion and particularly the larger reservoirs are sensitive for this (e.g., S-pouches, W-pouches,
Surgical Causes of Pouch Dysfunction
(a) Dysfunction related to the rectal cuff length:
A rectal cuff that is of an improper length may be resultant from the double-stapling technique for performing the ileoanal anasto­mosis. The cuff should not be larger than 2 centimeters; otherwise this will result in a retained rectum. It is believed that having such a cuff has a role in the ne continence discriminating passage of air versus uid. The problem with having a long cuff (retained rectum), however, is the occurrence of cuftis in ulcerative colitis and recurrent pol­yps in familial polyposis. If these conditions cannot be treated medically or by endoscopic removal, respectively, the cuff requires surgi­cal excision.
(b) Retained rectum: A retained rectum is
dened if the remaining rectum is >2 cm. Proctitis of the retained rectum can cause urge and increased bowel movements, thus negatively impacting anorectal function. If symptomatic, this should be corrected by
Fig. 20.7 Specimen of pouch on retained rectum
204
Fig. 20.8 Efferent loop of S-pouch (arrow)
W. A. Bemelman
Fig. 20.9 Overdistended S-pouch before remodeling
and long J-pouches). If symptoms of prob­lematic evacuation warrant a redo pouch, and if the patients prefer not to have an ileostomy, the pouch needs to be dissected and remod­eled, or an altogether new pouch should be fashioned (Fig.20.10).
(e) Chronic sinus: A chronic sinus is dened as
an anastomotic leak that persists for longer
Fig. 20.10 Remodeled pouch
20 Indications forBenign Disease oftheRectum
205
than 1year. These sinuses can be quite clini­cally evident and may be the reason that prevents closure of a defunctioning ileos­tomy; or the sinus(es) can be clinically silent causing pouch dysfunction often mis­diagnosed as refractory pouchitis [14]. Cross-sectional imaging is therefore imper­ative in case of chronic pouch dysfunction (Fig.20.11).
(f) The failed pouch. The top three causes for
pouch failure are Crohn’s disease (Fig. 20.12), prior anastomotic leakage/ pelvic sepsis, and refractory pouchitis [15]. The chronic dysfunctioning pouch can be diverted with an ileostomy. If symptoms persist (e.g., severe perianal stula in Crohn’s disease or uncontrollable anal dis­charge), it is best if the pouch is excised. The remaining space within the pelvic cav­ity must be lled, and typically omentum or small bowel mesentery is placed in the cav­ity in order to prevent abscess formation in the pelvis.
The patient is placed in the Lloyd Davis position. A perianal nerve block is done to relax the external sphincter muscle. A Lone Star Retractor is secured to expose the anorectum.
Cuff/efferent loop excision Depending on the level of the pouch-anal anastomosis, the rectal mucosa is incised just below the ileoanal anas­tomosis using either retractors or the TAMIS platform. If the ileoanal anastomosis was already at the level of the dentate line (e.g., as is the case for an S-pouch), care must be taken not to damage the internal sphincter muscle. Transection of the muscular layer should be done at the level of the ileoanal anastomosis in
Surgical Approach
(a) Transanal excision of cuff, retained rectum
or efferent loop, and sleeve advancement of the pouch with or without transabdominal mobilization of the pouch
Fig. 20.11 Endoscopic image of sinus (left), MRI with sinus (arrow, right)
Fig. 20.12 Crohn’s disease in pouch
206
W. A. Bemelman
order to preserve the internal sphincter mus­cle. In case of cuftis, a mucosectomy can be done to preserve the internal sphincter muscle. Careful dissection of the distal pouch or the efferent loop is performed. If mobilization of the distal pouch and cuff or efferent loop pro­ceeds successfully (Fig.20.13), the mobilized portion can be exteriorized via the anus, the cuff or efferent loop can be excised, and a hand-sewn anastomosis can be constructed. If bottom-up mobilization is insufcient, either open or laparoscopic mobilization of the proximal part of the pouch and its mesentery must be performed. In the latter case, it is advisable to defunction the hand-sewn anasto­mosis (Fig.20.14).
Retained rectum
The rectal wall is tran-
sected 2–3cm cranial from the dentate line. Applying a close rectal dissection technique,
Fig. 20.13 Transanal view on TAMIS mobilized pouch
Fig. 20.14 Distal part of pouch can be exteriorized for
excision
the retained rectum is dissected until the ileo­rectal anastomosis is encountered. Thereafter, the pouch is carefully mobilized in order to preserve the pouch. Since the pouch must be brought down over a considerable distance, either laparoscopically or via an open (i.e., Pfannenstiel or low midline) incision, mobi­lization of the pouch and its mesentery is necessary to gain the additional reach required. After freeing the pouch, including the pouch rectal anastomosis and the retained rectum, the latter two are excised. Preferably a single- stapled, double purse-string ileoanal anastomosis is constructed, thereby creating a union between the pouch and anus. This removes another 1.5cm of rectal cuff. In the end, a small rim of cuff 1–1.5cm is preserved for better ne continence (Fig.20.15).
(b) Transanal and transabdominal mobilization
of the pouch with revision of the pouch or new pouch in case of mega-pouch or chronic pelvic sepsis.
Again, the patient is placed in the Lloyd Davis position; a Lone Star Retractor is placed transanally and a perianal nerve block performed. The TAMIS platform is also utilized for Ta surgery. Depending on the type of prior ileoanal anastomosis, hand-sewn after mucosectomy or double stapled, the rectal cuff is transected just below the anastomosis avoiding any dam­age to the internal sphincter muscle. A mucosectomy and transection of the muscu­lar wall at a higher level might be appropri­ate. The rst part of the bottom-up dissection can be done using retractors or via the TAMIS platform. The bottom-up TAMIS dissection proceeds as far proximal as pos­sible after which the rendezvous is made with the top-down dissection of pouch and its mesentery. The completely detached and mobilized pouch can be remodeled. In case of revisionary surgery for a mega-pouch, the pouch must be reduced in size. Care must be taken in case of reducing the pouch in size longitudinally, so that the vascular­ization to the remaining pouch is not com­promised (Figs.20.9 and 20.10).
Dorsal line
y
20 Indications forBenign Disease oftheRectum
Fig. 20.15 Schematic excision of cuff (Litzendorf etal.) [16]
207
Mucosal proctectom
Dentate line
Dentate line
208
W. A. Bemelman
In case of pelvic sepsis, the pouch is often reduced in size due to brosis, and the required excision is of this brotic distal part of the pouch. Quite often, a blind loop is present, giving the opportunity to enlarge the pouch by incorporating the blind loop into the lumen of the pouch using linear staplers. Presacral sinuses must be carefully debrided to prevent recurrent abscesses. The ileoanal anastomosis is made using a hand-sewn technique, with interrupted 3-0 Vicryl sutures; defunctioning is routinely performed. A pelvic drain is left in place for 48 h and 5 days of antibiotics are prescribed in the patients that were operated on for an index diagnosis of pelvic sepsis.
(c) Transanal and transabdominal intersphincteric
excision of the pouch with omentoplasty in case of pelvic sepsis or Crohn’s disease of the pouch.
Similar to previous approaches, the patient is placed in the Lloyd Davis position; a Lone Star Retractor placed transanally and a peri­anal nerve block performed. The TAMIS plat­form is also utilized for Ta surgery. The incision is done at the level of the intersphinc­teric groove. The intersphincteric plane of dis­section is followed up to the ileoanal anastomosis. Next, the TAMIS port is inserted and the bottom-up dissection is proceeded via TAMIS.Either via low midline laparotomy or laparoscopy when feasible, the top-down dis­section is proceeded until the rendezvous is made. The pouch is excised and an end-loop ileostomy is made. If there is sufcient omen­tum, a pedicled omentoplasty is created after careful debridement of any septic pockets in the pelvis (Fig.20.16). If there is no omentum,
Fig. 20.16 Pediculized omentoplasty schematic (left) and in the intersphincteric wound (right)