Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_837_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Second Edition Clinical Decision Making
- •Acknowledgments
- •Contents
- •Editors and Contributors
- •Editors
- •Contributors
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 1.1
- •Conclusion
- •Suggested Reading
- •1: Anorectal Examination
- •Suggested Reading
- •3: Physiologic Testing
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 3.3
- •Suggested Reading
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 4.1
- •Single Center Studies
- •Special Considerations
- •Low Rectal or Coloanal Anastomosis
- •Multi-center Studies
- •Suggested Reading
- •Summary
- •Suggested Reading
- •Introduction
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 6.1
- •Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery
- •Intraoperative Fluid Administration
- •Analgesia
- •Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis
- •Surgical Site Infection Prevention
- •Postoperative Analgesia
- •Intravenous Fluid Management
- •Early Oral Feeding
- •Early Ambulation
- •Conclusion
- •Suggested Reading
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 7.1
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 7.2
- •Melena Caused by Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
- •Hematochezia Caused by Anorectal Bleeding
- •Severe Hematochezia Causing Hemodynamic Instability
- •Suggested Reading
- •Suggested Reading
- •Suggested Reading
- •10: Anal Conditions: Anal Fissure/Recurrent Anal Fissure
- •Suggested Reading
- •Suggested Reading
- •12: Anorectal Abscess
- •Suggested Reading
- •13: Anal Conditions: Fistula-in-Ano
- •Suggested Reading
- •14: Anal Conditions: Rectovaginal Fistula
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 14.1
- •Background
- •Etiology
- •Evaluation
- •Treatment
- •Ileoanal Pouch-Vaginal Fistulas
- •Vaginal Approaches
- •Conclusion
- •Suggested Reading
- •15: Anal Conditions: Anorectal Crohn’s Disease—Fistula
- •Introduction
- •Conclusion
- •Suggested Reading
- •Suggested Reading
- •Suggested Reading
- •18: Anal Conditions: External Hemorrhoids
- •Introduction
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 18.4
- •Suggested Reading
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 19.1
- •D. Hair Removal
- •Suggested Reading
- •20: Anal Conditions: Pruritus Ani
- •Suggested Reading
- •21: Anal Conditions: Hidradenitis Suppurativa
- •Suggested Reading
- •22: Anal Conditions: Anorectal Trauma
- •Suggested Reading
- •23: Anal Conditions: STDs
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 23.1
- •Anal Conditions: Sexually Transmitted Diseases
- •Suggested Reading
- •24: Anal Considerations: Fournier’s Gangrene
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 24.1
- •Suggested Reading
- •25: Non-healing Perineal Wounds
- •Suggested Reading
- •26: Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasms
- •Diagnoses
- •Suggested Reading
- •27: Anal Conditions: Anal Margin Tumors
- •Suggested Reading
- •28: Invasive Anal Canal Neoplasia
- •Suggested Reading
- •29: Pelvic Floor Conditions: Rectal Prolapse/Recurrence
- •Suggested Reading
- •30: Pelvic Floor Conditions: Rectal Intussusception
- •Suggested Reading
- •31: Pelvic Outlet Obstruction
- •Suggested Reading
- •32: Pelvic Floor Conditions: Biofeedback
- •Background
- •Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
- •Biofeedback Therapy
- •Suggested Reading
- •33: Pelvic Floor Conditions: Fecal Incontinence
- •Fiber Supplementation
- •Medications
- •Biofeedback
- •End-to-End Sphincteroplasty
- •Tibial Nerve Stimulation
- •Graciloplasty
- •Gluteoplasty
- •∗Other Therapies
- •Injectables
- •RF Remodeling
- •Conclusion
- •Suggested Reading
- •34: Pelvic Floor Conditions: Diarrhea
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 34.1
- •Suggested Reading
- •35: Chronic Constipation
- •Introduction
- •Diagnosis
- •Management
- •Suggested Reading
- •36: Retrorectal Tumors
- •Evaluation
- •Risk Assessment
- •Pathology: Four Tissue Types
- •Treatment
- •Suggested Reading
- •37: Rectal Cancer: Local Therapy
- •Suggested Reading
- •38: Rectal Conditions: Rectal Cancer—Proctectomy
- •Suggested Reading
- •39: Rectal Conditions: Rectal Cancer—Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 39.1
- •Suggested Reading
- •40: Rectal Conditions: Stage IV Rectal Cancer
- •Introduction
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 40.1
- •Suggested Reading
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 41.1
- •Suggested Reading
- •42: Rectal Conditions: Rectal Cancer—Postoperative Surveillance
- •Suggested Reading
- •43: Recurrent Rectal Cancer
- •Introduction
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 43.2
- •A–C.
- •Carbon-Ion Radiation (CIRT)
- •Conclusion
- •Suggested Reading
- •44: Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
- •Suggested Reading
- •45: Colonic: Diverticulitis
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 45.1
- •Suggested Reading
- •46: Colonic Conditions: Large Bowel Obstruction
- •Suggested Reading
- •47: Colonic Conditions: Volvulus
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 47.1
- •Introduction
- •Suggested Reading
- •48: Colonic Stricture
- •Suggested Reading
- •49: Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (ACPO): Ogilvie’s Syndrome
- •Suggested Reading
- •50: Colonic Conditions: Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
- •Introduction
- •Suggested Reading
- •51: Colorectal Trauma
- •Suggested Reading
- •52: Endometriosis
- •Suggested Reading
- •53: Colonic Conditions: Ulcerative Colitis
- •Conclusions
- •Suggested Reading
- •54: Colonic Conditions: Indeterminate Colitis
- •Suggested Reading
- •55: Colonic Conditions: Toxic Colitis
- •Medical Management
- •Risk Assessment
- •Surgical Management
- •Suggested Reading
- •56: Crohn’s Colitis
- •Suggested Reading
- •57: Ischemic Colitis
- •Suggested Reading
- •58: Colonic Conditions: Infectious Colitis
- •Suggested Reading
- •59: Colonic Conditions: Benign Colonic Neoplasia
- •Suggested Reading
- •60: Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
- •Suggested Reading
- •61: Colonic Conditions: Lynch Syndrome
- •Suspected Lynch Syndrome
- •Lynch Syndrome Diagnosis Without Clinical Symptoms or Phenotype
- •Suggested Reading
- •62: Malignant Colon Polyps
- •Suggested Reading
- •63: Colonic Conditions: Adenomatous Polyps
- •Suggested Reading
- •64: Colon Cancer Surgical Therapy
- •Suggested Reading
- •65: Colonic Conditions: Locally Advanced Colon Cancer
- •Conclusion
- •Suggested Reading
- •66: Recurrent Colon Cancer
- •Suggested Reading
- •67: Appendiceal Neoplasms

414
M. C. Turner and J. Migaly
Evaluation for stricture with gastrografn enema is prudent prior to take
down of diverting ileostomy.
(e) Fistula Formation: Pouch-vaginal stu-
las occur at a rate of 3–15%. Increased
vaginal discharge is the typical presenting symptom, or stulae may be found
during evaluation for ileostomy take
down. Stepwise management can be
with seton placement, endoanal ileal
advancement ap, gracilis muscle
interposition, or require pouch revision,
depending on severity and previous
failed closure attempts. Proximal diversion alone is typically insufcient for
closure of the stula tract. Evaluation
for stula with gastrografn enema is
prudent prior to diverting ileostomy
take down.
(f) Sexual Complications: Women with UC
of childbearing age who undergo proctocolectomy have decreased fertility compared to women who elect for medical
management. This is postulated to be the
result of pelvic adhesive disease obstructing the fallopian tubes. Mitigation of this
risk includes medical management of
UC, TAC with ileorectal anastomosis, or
TAC with end ileostomy, with plan for
subsequent IPAA when childbearing is
complete. There is no impact on male
fertility. Men with UC report improved
sexual quality of life following
IPAA. While data regarding rates of
erectile dysfunction and retrograde ejaculation are mixed, overall sexual satisfaction compared to preoperative
function is preserved to improved.
Women report increase in dyspareunia,
but overall unchanged coital or orgasm
frequency following IPAA.
(g) Pouchitis: Pouchitis, presenting as
increased stool frequency, bleeding,
abdominal pain, incontinence and
fever, approaches a 50% occurrence
rate 10 years postoperatively from
IPAA. It occurs as a result of bacterial
overgrowth, and is treated with aerobic
and anaerobic antibiotic coverage.
Refractory symptoms may be allevi-
ated with topical steroids or aminosalicylates. Furthermore, chronic or
cyclic antibiotics may also be required.
Chronic pouchitis requires reevaluation for Crohn’s disease.
Proximal diversion typically does not
resolve symptoms, and excision and
creation of a new pouch will likely
result in recurrent symptoms of the new
pouch. Pouch excision and end-ileostomy are rarely required. Finally, it is
important to ensure that pouchitis is not
a manifestation of “cuftis” where
there is residual tissue between the dentate line and pouch anastomosis that is
chronically inamed. While this may
respond to topical therapy, mucosal
stripping may be required.
(h) Re-do IPAA: Pouch failure requiring
excision and end ileostomy versus
re-do occurs between 3–15% of
patients, with sepsis being the driving
cause. Re-do IPAAs can be performed
transanally or transabdominally and are
associated with similar quality of life
relative to primary IPAA. Re-do surgery is associated with increased risk to
nerve, ureter, and vessel injury.
X. Functional Outcomes: Following IPAA and
diversion take down, patients typically
experience six bowel movements in a 24h
period. The long-term patient satisfaction
with symptom improvement is remarkable,
with high quality of life scores that persist
over time.
Y. Stoma Complications: While most stomas
are tolerated well, several complications
can occur, and up to 30% of patients with
end ileostomy will require re-intervention
on their ostomy. These complications
include retraction, stenosis, prolapse, and
parastomal hernia. Skin excoriation is common and can be mitigated with appropriately sized appliances.
Z. Continent Ileostomy: The continent ileos-
tomy, Kock pouch, is largely of historical
signicance secondary to its high rate of
complications and the improved techniques
for sphincter preserving operations.
Candidates are highly motivated patients

53 Colonic Conditions: Ulcerative Colitis
415
who are unable to undergo IPAA/
IRA. Following total abdominal colectomy
an ileal pouch is created with 45cm of small
bowel folded into an ‘S’ formation. The distal outow is congured into intussusception
which serves as an in situ valve. As stool
builds in the pouch, the pressure occludes the
valve preventing evacuation. The pouch is
initially cannulated to gravity drainage, and
is matured overtime with increasing volumes
of distention for extended periods of catheter
clamp time. Ultimately, the goal is to cannulate the pouch for evacuation several times
per day. Postoperative complications are
common: in addition to complications seen
with loop and end ileostomy, herniation,
stricture, prolapse, and excoriation, the Kock
pouch can be complicated by stula formation, subluxation of the nipple valve, and
perforation with cannulation. These complications carry signicant morbidity and risk
of sepsis, and ultimately many are converted
to traditional end ileostomy.
AA. Ileorectal Anastomosis: Ileorectal anasto-
mosis (IRA), while having the benet of
preserving the reservoir function of the
rectum, is infrequently performed in the
setting of UC.This is secondary to continued inammatory symptoms of the rectum, and the annual rectal mucosal
surveillance required. For elderly patients,
those who have a limited life span, and
who have minimal symptoms at the rectum, without evidence of dysplastic
changes, an IRA may be appropriate. If
refractory symptoms occur, or neoplasia is
identied in the rectum, these patients are
candidates for IPAA or completion proctectomy with end ileostomy. Strict surveillance for dysplasia of the rectal tissue is
required. Additionally, chronic medical
management strategies must be employed
to mitigate proctitis symptoms.
BB. Indeterminate Colitis: Approximately 10%
of patients affected with colitis will not t
diagnostic criteria for either Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis. Previously, this
entity was referred to indeterminate colitis
(IC) which is now a designation reserved
following conrmation with specimen
pathology, and the term inammatory
bowel disease unspecied (IBDU) is the
preferred preoperative distinction. In this
scenario, the most appropriate surgical
management can be difcult to discern,
especially in the setting of fulminant colitis.
Recent studies demonstrate equivalent outcomes between patients with UC, IC and
IBDU following IPAA.
CC. Postoperative Care: Historically, postopera-
tive management for colonic resection
included nil per os until return of bowel
function, and serial monitoring of postoperative laboratories. In the modern era,
enhanced recovery protocols (ERAS) are
found to be safe, effective, and practical. At
our institution, for appropriately selected
patients, we use the following ERAS protocol. Preoperatively, patients undergo a
mechanical and non-absorbable enteral
antibiotic preparation. An epidural pain
catheter is placed preoperatively, and managed by our anesthesia colleagues both
intra- and postoperatively. Intraoperative
goal directed uid resuscitation is used following hemodynamic and urine output metrics. A regular diet is resumed on
postoperative day zero. Postoperative day
one, the urinary catheter is removed, and a
stoma nurse works with the patient on
ostomy care. The expectation is that the
patient will be out of bed, and physical therapy consulted for those who require it.
Postoperative day 2 brings transition to oral
pain medication and removal of epidural
catheter if a diet has been tolerated. Once
the patient is comfortable with their pain
management, understands how to manage
their ostomy, is tolerating a diet, and able to
complete their activities of daily living,
they are discharged from the hospital.
Conclusions
While UC is managed with improving medical
therapies all patients require endoscopic oncologic surveillance, and nearly half will require
operative intervention for sequela of the disease. Improved resection techniques that are

416
M. C. Turner and J. Migaly
sphincter preserving and minimally invasive in
nature have led to improved quality of life for
patients with UC while mitigating, eliminating, or treating oncologic risk.
Suggested Reading
Bernstein CN, Shanahan F, Weinstein WM.Are we tell-
ing patients the truth about surveillance colonoscopy
in ulcerative colitis? Lancet. 1994;343(8889):71–4.
Cornish JA, Tan E, Teare J, etal. The effect of restorative
proctocolectomy on sexual function, urinary function,
fertility, pregnancy and delivery: a systematic review.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(8):1128–38.
da Luz Moreira A, Kiran RP, Lavery I.Clinical outcomes
of ileorectal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Br J
Surg. 2010;97(1):65–9.
Dayton MT, Larsen KR, Christiansen DD.Similar func-
tional results and complications after ileal pouch-anal
anastomosis in patients with indeterminate vs ulcerative colitis. Arch Surg. 2002;137(6):690–4; discussion 694–5
Fefferman DS, Farrell RJ. Endoscopy in inamma-
tory bowel disease: indications, surveillance, and
use in clinical practice. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2005;3(1):11–24.
Gorne SR, Bauer JJ, Harris MT, et al. Dysplasia
complicating chronic ulcerative colitis: is immediate colectomy warranted? Dis Colon Rectum.
2000;43(11):1575–81.
Gorgun E, Remzi FH, Montague DK, etal. Male sexual
function improves after ileal pouch anal anastomosis.
Colorectal Dis. 2005;7(6):545–50.
Kayal M, Plietz M, Rizvi A, Radcliffe M, Riggs A, Yzet
C, Tixier E, Trivedi P, Ungaro RC, Khaitov S, Sylla
P, Greenstein A, Frederic Colombel J, Dubinsky
MC. Inammatory pouch conditions are common
after ileal pouch anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis
patients. Inamm Bowel Dis. 2019:izz227.
Laine L, Kaltenbach T, Barkun A, McQuaid KR,
Subramanian V, Soetikno R, East JE, Farraye
FA, Feagan B, Ioannidis J, Kiesslich R, Krier M,
Matsumoto T, McCabe RP, Mönkemüller K, Odze R,
Picco M, Rubin DT, Rubin M, Rubio CA, Rutter MD,
Sanchez-Yague A, Sanduleanu S, Shergill A, Ullman
T, Velayos F, Yakich D, Yang Y-X. SCENIC international consensus statement on surveillance and management of dysplasia in inammatory bowel disease.
Gastroenterology. 2015;148(3):639–651.e28.
Manilich E, Remzi FH, Fazio VW, Church JM, Kiran
RP. Prognostic modeling of preoperative risk factors
of pouch failure. Dis Colon Rectum. 55(4):393–9.
Mennigen R, Senninger N, Bruewer M, etal. Pouch func-
tion and quality of life after successful management
of pouch-related septic complications in patients
with ulcerative colitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg.
2012;397(1):37–44.
Mor IJ, Vogel JD, da Luz Moreira A, Shen B, Hammel J,
Remzi FH. Iniximab in ulcerative colitis is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications after restorative proctocolectomy. Diseases of
the Colon & Rectum. 51(8):1202–10.
Remzi FH, Aytac E, Ashburn J, Gu J, Hull TL, Dietz DW,
Stocchi L, Church JM, Shen B.Transabdominal redo
ileal pouch surgery for failed restorative proctocolectomy. Ann Surg. 262(4):675–82.
Ross H, Steele SR, Varma M, Dykes S, Cima R, Donald
Buie W, Rafferty J. Practice parameters for the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis. Diseases of the
Colon & Rectum. 57(1):5–22.
Rossi C, Beyer-Berjot L, Maggiori L, Prost-à-la-Denise
J, Berdah S, Panis Y.Redo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: outcomes from a case-controlled study. Colorectal
Dis. 2019;21(3):326–34.
Rubin DT, Ananthakrishnan AN, Siegel CA, Sauer
BG, Long MD. ACG clinical guideline. Am J
Gastroenterol. 114(3):384–413.
Soetikno R, Kaltenbach T, McQuaid KR, Subramanian
V, Kumar R, Barkun AN, Laine L. Paradigm shift
in the surveillance and management of dysplasia in
inammatory bowel disease (West). Dig Endosc.
2016;28(3):266–73.
Trickett JP, Tilney HS, Gudgeon AM, etal. Management
of the rectal stump after emergency sub-total colectomy: which surgical option is associated with the
lowest morbidity? Colorectal Dis. 2005;7(5):519–22.
Vavricka SR, Schoepfer A, Scharl M, etal. Extraintestinal
manifestations of inammatory bowel disease.
Inamm Bowel Dis. 2015;21(8):1982–92.
Yang Z, Wu Q, Wu K, Fan D. Meta-analysis: pre-oper-
ative iniximab treatment and short-term post-operative complications in patients with ulcerative colitis.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;31(4):486–92.

Colonic Conditions: Indeterminate Colitis
JonD.Vogel andMarianaBerho
54
See Algorithm inFig. 54.1
A. Similar to ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s coli-
tis, patients with IC or IBDU typically have
symptoms of diarrhea, blood in the stool,
abdominal pain, fecal urgency, and tenesmus. With each of these colitides, severe or
fulminant presentations may occur.
B. A detailed medical and family history is per-
formed to search for clues that implicate
Crohn’s disease as the underlying pathology.
Prior small bowel obstruction, obstructive
symptoms, or perianal disease are suggestive of Crohn’s disease. Symptoms of
extraintestinal disease and family history of
IBD are also assessed. Colitis disease severity may be estimated by stool frequency,
blood in the stool, weight loss, anemia, or
signs of “toxicity” such as fever, tachycardia, or hypotension.
C. The physical examination is used to assess
colitis severity (e.g. abdominal distension or
tenderness), and to look for clues of Crohn’s
disease such as palpable abdominal mass,
edematous anal skin tags, perianal abscess or
J. D. Vogel (*)
University ofColorado, Aurora, CO, USA
e-mail: jon.vogel@ucdenver.edu
M. Berho
Department ofPathology, Cleveland Clinic Florida,
Weston, FL, USA
stula, anal stenosis, or scars from prior anorectal surgery.
D. A complete blood count and serum albumin
measurement are helpful to determine the
severity and chronicity of IBD-UC/IC. Stool
testing is performed to exclude Clostridium
difcile infection or other infectious etiologies of colitis. Serological biomarkers, such
as p-ANCA and ASCA, and genetic markers,
such as NOD2/CARD 15, are generally not
useful to establish the specic type of IBD.
E. CT or MR enterography are selectively used
to exclude the presence of small bowel disease or segmental colorectal disease that are
suggestive of CD. In acutely ill patients,
plain abdominal radiographs are used to
exclude megacolon or pneumoperitoneum.
F. Colonoscopy is used to evaluate the severity
and extent of colitis. Rectal sparing, segmental inammation, deep or linear ulcers, ileocecal valve or terminal ileal ulceration,
erythema, edema, or strictures are endoscopic ndings indicative of Crohn’s disease.
Alternatively, gross inammation that starts
in the rectum and extends proximally in a
continuous pattern and then transitions to
normal appearing mucosa is characteristic of
ulcerative colitis. Backwash ileitis, or continuous inammation of the terminal ileum
without focal ulceration or strictures, may
occur with ulcerative colitis. A discontinuous
“cecal patch” of inammation, that is limited
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
S. R. Steele etal. (eds.), Clinical Decision Making in Colorectal Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65942-8_54
417

418
J. D. Vogel and M. Berho
Presentation
A. Bloody diarrhea
Abdominal pain
Fig. 54.1 Algorithm for indeterminate colitis
Initial
Evaluation
B. History
C. Physical
examination
Evaluation
D. Lab testing
E. Imaging
F. Endoscopy
G. Gross pathology
H. Histopathology
to the mucosa immediately surrounding the
appendiceal orice, may also be seen in
UC.It is important to also note that medical
treatment of UC may result in segmental
colorectal mucosal changes and the false
impression that CD is the underlying disease.
Mucosal biopsies are obtained for histologic
assessment of inammation, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, dysplasia, or cancer.
G. Inammatory bowel disease—unclassied
(IBD-U) is the term to describe biopsy specimens with inammatory bowel disease in
which a denitive diagnosis of Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis cannot be made with
certainty. A diagnosis of indeterminate colitis
(IC) is based on the pathological analysis of
a colectomy specimen. Macroscopic pathological features of Crohn’s disease include
mesenteric fat wrapping of the bowel wall,
“skip areas” of inamed and normalappearing mucosa, segmental rather than
continuous mucosal inammation, small
bowel involvement beyond what is typical
for “backwash ileitis” (continuous inammation of the terminal ileal mucosa without
stricture or deep ulceration), stula, stricture,
cobblestone appearance of the intestinal
mucosa, transmural inammation, and perianal disease. Grossly, ulcerative colitis is
characterized by continuous mucosal inam-
Acute
Treatment
I. Medical
treatment
J. Urgent surgery
K. Elective surgery
Outcome
L. Short-term
outcomes
M. Long-term
outcomes
N. Functional
outcomes
mation that begins in the rectum and “spreads
like a sheet” into the more proximal colon.
Mesenteric fat wrapping or segmental
colonic mucosal inammation, in the absence
of other distinct features Crohn’s disease or
ulcerative colitis, raise the specter of indeterminate colitis (Table54.1, Fig.54.2).
H. Histological features of Crohn’s disease
include non-caseating granulomas (identied
in 20% of biopsy specimens and 50% colectomy specimens), and aphthous ulcers. These
ndings are inconsistent with a diagnosis of
ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis.
Nerve cell hyperplasia and vasculitis may be
seen in Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis
but are more common in Crohn’s disease.
Transmural inammation occurs in Crohn’s
disease but may also be present with severe
colitis due to ulcerative or indeterminate
colitis (Table54.2, Fig.54.3).
I. The medical treatment of UC, CD, and
IBD-U/IC are similar and typically include
the 5-ASA drugs, glucocorticoids, azathioprine, and biologic therapies targeted at
TNF-alpha or intestinal mucosal integrin.
Supportive therapy with intravenous uids,
antibiotic treatment of clostridium difcile as
needed, and the use of antibiotics to treat suspected or proven infectious processes that
complicate IBD colitis may also be required.

54 Colonic Conditions: Indeterminate Colitis
Table 54.1 Macroscopic features useful to distinguish ulcerative colitis from Crohn’s disease
Ulcerative
colitis
Fat wrapping No Yes Occasionally in areas
Segmental
involvement/rectal
sparing
Small intestinal
involvement
Fistulas No Ye s No
Cobblestone
appearance
Predominantly distal
disease
Anal/perianal disease No Ye s
a
A diagnosis of backwash ileitis should be limited to those cases with a mild inammation limited to the distal 5cm of
the terminal ileum, the presence of deep ulceration should raise the possibility of Crohn’s disease
b
The presence of anal/perianal disease should strongly raise the possibility of Crohn’s disease even when the rest of the
pathological changes are equivocal
No Ye s Common – Medical treatment in UC may lead to
No Ye s No – UC may display “backwash ileitis”
No Ye s No
Yes No No – UC may show discontinuous
Crohn’s
disease Indeterminate colitis Caveats
of deep ulceration
b
No
– Severe cases of UC with deep ulcers
may display fat wrapping
uneven healing and areas of
“pseudosparing”
– Up to 20% of cases of CD present
with colonic involvement only
involvement of the cecum (cecal patch)
419
a
simplies subsequent proctectomy via preservation natural tissue planes. Rectal resection is usually avoided in the acute setting to
minimize potential complications of surgery
and to allow pathology review of the resected
colon to help solidify the diagnosis.
K. Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anas-
tomosis (IPAA) may be performed in carefully selected patients with IBD colitis in
whom the diagnosis of CD, particularly small
bowel or perianal CD, has been excluded.
Fig. 54.2 Indeterminate colitis
Open or minimally invasive surgical techniques may be used. The decision to perform
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis is
also generally recommended in hospitalized
patients with IBD.
J. Urgent subtotal or total abdominal colectomy
with ileostomy is generally indicated for
IBD-U complicated by severe colitis refractory to medical therapy, megacolon, colonic
perforation, or hemorrhage. Open or minimally invasive surgical techniques may be
used. Preservation of the inferior mesenteric
artery pedicle and the distal sigmoid colon
facilitates subcutaneous implantation of the
stapled sigmoid stump or creation of a sigmoid mucous stula when necessary (e.g.
severely edematous distal colon) and also
a one- or multi-staged proctocolectomy
should be an individualized decision with
consideration of the risks and benets associated with each approach. In general, staged
IPAA procedures, with initial subtotal colectomy and end ileostomy, are performed in
patients who are malnourished, on highdoses of steroids, or have ndings at surgery,
such as extraordinary fragility of the tissues
and bleeding during the colectomy. Subtotal
or total abdominal colectomy with end ileostomy is also recommended when the operative ndings are suspicious for Crohn’s
disease. In this situation, pathology review of
the colectomy specimen will often help guide

420
J. D. Vogel and M. Berho
Table 54.2 Microscopic features useful to distinguish ulcerative colitis from Crohn’s disease
Ulcerative
colitis Crohn’s disease
Granulomas No Yes
Transmural
inammation
Aphthous
ulcers
Nerve cell
hyperplasia
Vasculitis + +++ No
No Yes Common Severe UC may display transmural
No Yes No
+ +++ No
Only 20% of biopsies and
approximately 50 to 60% of
surgical specimens
Indeterminate
colitis Caveats
No Ruptured crypts secondary to
inammation may show
granulomatous reaction in
ulcerative colitis
inammation in areas of deep
ulcers
patients. In Dayton’s series, there were no
differences in early postoperative IPAA
complications
M. Long-term outcomes of IPAA for IC com-
pared to UC vary and include an eventual
change in the diagnosis to Crohn’s disease in
1–15% of patients and pouch failure (requiring diverting ileostomy or pouch excision) in
2–23% of patients. With 10-year follow-up,
Yu reported signicantly more long-term
complications in IC patients compared to UC
including pelvic sepsis, pouch stula, and
pouch failure (23% vs. 9%). More recently,
Fig. 54.3 Deep ulceration
Murrell and colleagues reported similar
IPAA outcomes for their IC and UC patients
future surgical decisions. Proctolectomy with
permanent ileostomy may be appropriate for
elderly patients, or those who have impaired
anal sphincter function, or for patients who
have other reasons for which an ileo-anal reservoir is a poor choice. Total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis may also
be considered in select patients with a grossly
normal and dysplasia-free rectum who accept
the risk of proctitis, the need for subsequent
medical or surgical therapy for the rectum,
and who are compliant with rectal mucosa
surveillance.
L. In the series reported by Yu, Brown, and
Delaney, early postoperative complications
of IPPA surgery, including pelvic sepsis and
stula formation, but not anastomotic leak,
occurred more often in IC compared to UC
with conversion to a diagnosis of CD in 14
(14%) of 98 patients with IC, and 29 (11%)
of 236 patients with UC (Table 54.3).
Pouchitis occurs with similar frequency
among patients with UC and IC (Yu, Dayton,
Murrell). In patients with an IPAA who con-
vert from a diagnosis of IC to CD, pelvic
perineal sepsis is treated with antibiotics,
incision and drainage, and liberal use of
draining setons. Mucosal inammation or
stulizing disease is initially treated with the
full spectrum of Crohn’s disease medical
therapy. In patients in whom the above inter-
ventions fail, the use of a diverting ileostomy
or excision of the ileal pouch with permanent
ileostomy must be considered.
N. In a study from the Cleveland Clinic
(Delaney), in which 115 IC and 1399 UC

54 Colonic Conditions: Indeterminate Colitis
Table 54.3 Published series on indeterminate colitis
Author Year IC patients (N) IC→CD (%)
Marcello 1997 53 13 12 499 3 2
Yu 2000 82 15 23 1437 2 9
Delaney 2002 115 6 3 1399 1.3 3.5
Dayton 2002 79 1 2.5 565 0.7 1.2
Brown 2005 21 0 10 1135 NA 6
Murrell 2009 97 14 NA 237 11 NA
Table modied from C.Delaney etal. 2002
IC patients indeterminate colitis patients, IC→ CD IC patients subsequently diagnosed with Crohn’s Disease, IC w/
IPAA failure patients with IC and IPAA with subsequent IPAA excision or permanent ileostomy, UC patients ulcerative
colitis patients, UC→CD UC patients subsequently diagnosed with Crohn’s disease, UC w/IPAA failure patients with
UC and IPAA with subsequent IPAA excision or permanent ileostomy
IC w/IPAA
failure (%)
UC patients
(N) UC→CD (%)
UC w/IPAA
failure (%)
421
patients who underwent IPAA, the functional outcomes were largely similar for the
two diagnoses. Daytime bowel movements
numbered 4–8 and nighttime were 0–2. The
majority (70–74%) reported rare or no fecal
incontinence and nighttime stool seepage
occurred in about one-third of IC and UC
patients. Similar functional results for
IPAA in UC and IC have also been reported
by surgeons from the University of Toronto
(Brown), Louisville (Rudolph), Utah
(Dayton) and the Mayo Clinic (Yu).
Suggested Reading
Brown CJ, Maclean AR, Cohen Z, Macrae HM, O'Connor
BI, McLeod RS. Crohn’s disease and indeterminate
colitis and the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: outcomes and patterns of failure. Dis Colon Rectum.
2005;48(8):1542–9.
Dayton MT, Larsen KR, Christiansen DD.Similar func-
tional results and complications after ileal pouch-anal
anastomosis in patients with indeterminate vs ulcerative colitis. Arch Surg. 2002;137(6):690–4; discussion 4–5
Delaney CP, Remzi FH, Gramlich T, Dadvand B, Fazio
VW. Equivalent function, quality of life and pouch
survival rates after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis
for indeterminate and ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg.
2002;236(1):43–8.
Murrell ZA, Melmed GY, Ippoliti A, Vasiliauskas EA,
Dubinsky M, Targan SR, et al. A prospective evaluation of the long-term outcome of ileal pouch-anal
anastomosis in patients with inammatory bowel
disease- unclassied and indeterminate colitis. Dis
Colon Rectum. 2009;52(5):872–8.
Odze RD. A contemporary and critical appraisal of
‘indeterminate colitis. Mod Pathol. 2015;28(Suppl
1):S30–46.
Price AB.Overlap in the spectrum of non-specic inam-
matory bowel disease—‘colitis indeterminate. J Clin
Pathol. 1978;31(6):567–77.
Rudolph WG, Uthoff SM, McAuliffe TL, Goode ET,
Petras RE, Galandiuk S.Indeterminate colitis: the real
story. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(11):1528–34.
Satsangi J, Silverberg MS, Vermeire S, Colombel JF.The
Montreal classication of inammatory bowel disease: controversies, consensus, and implications. Gut.
2006;55(6):749–53.
Tremaine WJ.Is indeterminate colitis determinable? Curr
Gastroenterol Rep. 2012;14(2):162–5.
Yu CS, Pemberton JH, Larson D.Ileal pouch-anal anasto-
mosis in patients with indeterminate colitis: long-term
results. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43(11):1487–96.

Colonic Conditions: Toxic Colitis
CarmenFong andBenjaminAbbadessa
55
Refer toAlgorithm in Fig.55.1
A. History and Physical
1. Clostridium difcile Infection (CDI,
Pseudomembranous colitis) is the leading
cause of infectious diarrhea in the world,
and has become increasingly more prevalent and severe. Two prevalent theories
behind C. difcile-associated toxic colitis
are that C. difcile exotoxin causes either
inammatory inltrates in the myenteric
plexus which lead to smooth muscle damage, or inammatory mediators such as
nitric oxide cause smooth muscle relaxation, both resulting in dilation and distension of the large bowel.
CDI may present with abdominal pain,
bloating, diarrhea (occasionally bloody),
and subjective fever and chills. However,
one study quotes up to 40% of patients
may present with the obstipation form of
CDI and may not have diarrhea. On physical exam, the patient may have marked
abdominal tenderness and distension. In
the most severe cases, the patient may also
be febrile, dehydrated and septic with profound leukocytosis. One report found that
96% of cases of the disease are associated
C. Fong · B. Abbadessa (*)
Department ofSurgery, Mount Sinai Beth Israel,
New York, NY, USA
e-mail: babbadessa@ucsd.edu
with use of antibiotics such as ciprooxacin or clindamycin within the last 14days.
Symptoms usually appear 2–3 days after
initiation of antibiotic therapy. Other risk
factors include IBD, recent travel, HIV
seropositivity, malnutrition, advanced age
and acid suppression with a proton pump
inhibitor.
2. Ulcerative Colitis (UC) is an autoimmune
disease characterized by chronic mucosalbased inammation of the colon. The disease begins in the rectum and may extend
proximally in a continuous manner to
involve all or part of the colon. The small
bowel and terminal ileum are not involved
but may show patterns of mucosal inammation due to local inammatory factors
associated with backwash ileitis. Patients
typically present with bloody diarrheal
stools. Abdominal pain is most common
with moderate and severe UC.On physical exam, patients with severe UC may
present with fever, leukocytosis, abdominal tenderness and distension. Most
patients’ disease course will involve
remissions and exacerbations.
3. Crohn’s Disease (CD) is a trans-mural,
autoimmune process that can affect the
entire length of the intestinal tract in a discontinuous manner. The most common
involved locations include the terminal
ileum (30%), ano-rectum and colon (20%)
and combined small bowel and colon
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
S. R. Steele etal. (eds.), Clinical Decision Making in Colorectal Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65942-8_55
423

424
Fig. 55.1 Algorithm for treatment of toxic colitis. DLI diverting loop ileostomy, ICL intraoperative colonic lavage
C. Fong and B. Abbadessa
disease (50%). CD has an incidence of
2–4 patients per 100,000in the Caucasian
population. It is more common in
Ashkenazi Jews, and 20 times more prevalent in patients with a family history.
Patients are more likely to be female and
tend to have a bimodal distribution of age
at presentation. The typical presentation
includes abdominal pain that is vague,
crampy and intermittent. There may be
hematochezia. Severe colitis may present
as, or progress to, major lower GI bleeding, perforation, obstruction, or fulminant
colitis. Extra- intestinal manifestations are
more frequent in Crohn’s disease than
Ulcerative colitis and include ocular, bone,
hepatobiliary and cutaneous manifestations. On physical exam, the patient may
look toxic, with fever, leukocytosis,
abdominal tenderness and distention.
B. Laboratory Testing
A complete blood count as well as a complete metabolic panel should be obtained, as
well as inammatory markers such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and
C-reactive protein (CRP). An elevated ESR
and CRP can signify disease.
Stool studies including tests for C. dif-
cile, cytomegalovirus, ova and parasites, and
stool leukocytes are important tools in diag-
nosis, and help differentiate between infectious and non-infectious causes of toxic
colitis. Within stool testing for C. difcile,
there are various modalities. A positive stool
culture indicates the presence of C. difcile
bacterium, whereas a positive stool toxin
indicates clinically signicant disease. Cell
cytotoxicity assays, which test for toxins
A&B, have sensitivities between 60% and
100%. The US Department of Health recommends a 2-stage test approach involving
enzyme immunoassay (EIA) glutamate dehydrogenase testing followed by cell cytotoxicity or cultures. This approach has >90%
sensitivity and specicity. A relatively new
modality, based on polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) testing of toxin genes, called nucleic
acid amplication tests (NAAT) is gaining
popularity as a faster and more reliable
method of diagnosis which may replace the
two- step method, as it has a 94–99% sensitivity rate.
Lastly, PCR for CMV has a sensitivity and
specicity in the blood of 45% and 87%, a
mucosal biopsy sensitivity of 90%, and sensitivity in stool of 67%, but nonetheless remains
an important differential diagnosis.
C. Imaging
A CT scan is a useful tool in evaluation of abdominal pain (Fig. 55.2). While
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
