Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_837_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
38 Мб
Скачать
ac
20 Anal Conditions: Pruritus Ani
161
E. Infectious causes of pruritus ani include bac-
terial, fungal, viral and parasitic infections.
• Common bacterial causes of pruritus ani include erythrasma, gonorrhea, and syphilis.
Corynebacterium minutissimum causes
erythrasma which affects the perianal area, axilla, thighs, and toe-web spaces. A classic, large pink-reddish patch is
seen initially which eventually turns brown (Figure20.3a). Under an ultra­violet lamp, the lesions appear with a coral to salmon uorescence from the porphyrin production made from the bacteria. Treatment is erythromycin 250mg four times a day for 10days.
– Patients who present with tenesmus, puru-
lence, proctitis, in addition to pruritus,
b
Fig. 20.3 Bacterial infections. (a) Erythrasma. Courtesy of Lee Smith, MD; (b) Purulence seen with gonorrhea infec- tion. Courtesy of Lee Smith, MD; (c) Primary chancre of syphilis. Courtesy of Lee Smith, MD
162
should be tested for gonococcal infection (Figure 20.3b). A swab should be done and placed on Thayer-Martin media. Anal gonorrhea is treated with ceftriaxone 250mg IM plus azithromycin 1g PO.
– Syphilis often presents as a painless
chancre, starting as a papule that even­tually ulcerates (Figure20.3c). In con­trast to syphilis, painful ulcers in the perianal region are usually associated with herpes and chancroid. Syphilis is caused by the spiral-shaped bacterium Treponema pallidum. These spirochetes can be seen on dark-eld microscopy from scrapings obtained at the base of the lesion. Alternatively, serologic screening can be done with a nontrepo­nemal test. Treatment is a one-time dose of penicillin G 2.4 million units IM.
• Pruritus ani from a fungal infection pres­ents with a markedly erythematous rash (Fig.20.4). This condition is more com­mon in patients with diabetes mellitus, obesity and immunocompromised states. Histopathology reveals hyphae of a fun­gus seen with a potassium hydroxide preparation. These patients often respond to topical nystatin 100,000units/g two to three times a day.
Viral etiologies of pruritus ani include herpes (HSV) and condyloma. – HSV infection often presents as painful,
scattered lesions including ulcers and ves­icles (Figure20.5a). A viral culture taken from the base of the ulcer or from vesicu­lar uid is usually diagnostic. Treatment of an acute episode is acyclovir 800mg three times a day for two days or valacy­clovir 500mg PO three times a day. For patients with frequent recurrences, acyclo­vir 400 mg twice daily or valacyclovir 500mg daily has been advocated.
– Large anal condylomata can cause pru-
ritus and usually require excision and/or fulguration in the operating room (Figure20.5b).
• Pinworm (Enterobius vermicularis) is a parasitic roundworm that can lead to pru­ritus ani. Gravid female pinworms migrate
B. L. Bello and K. Umanskiy
Fig. 20.4 Severe fungal infection. (With permission from Smith L.Perianal Dermatologic Disease. In: Gordon PH and Nivatvong S, editors. Principles and Practices of Surgery for the Colon, Rectum, and Anus. third ed. 2007 © Informa Healthcare publishing)
from the anus and eggs are left on the perianal folds causing irritation. This con­dition, more commonly affecting chil­dren, is notable for nocturnal itching. Scotch tape applied to the perianal region can reveal the eggs of the pinworm. Lactophenol can be used to enhance the slide (Fig. 20.6). Treatment is mebenda­zole 100mg PO as a single dose.
F. The most common dermatologic conditions
associated with pruritus ani are discussed below.
Psoriasis presents with erythema and sharply dened boundaries with or without the typical scaling (Fig.20.7). Patients with psoriasis will characteristically have lesions affecting the groin, genitalia, intergluteal cleft, axilla, and umbilicus. Treatment is usually a low to mid-potency topical steroid. Tacrolimus can also be used.
20 Anal Conditions: Pruritus Ani
a
163
Fig. 20.6 Eggs of Enterobius vermicularis. (With per- mission from Smith L.Perianal Dermatologic Disease. In Gordon PH and Nivatvong S, editors. Principles and Practices of Surgery for the Colon, Rectum, and Anus. 3rd edn. 2007 © Informa Healthcare publishing)
b
Fig. 20.5 Viral infections. (a) Herpes lesions Courtesy of Lee Smith, MD; (b) Anal condylomata. Courtesy of Lee Smith, MD
Lichen simplex chronicus is a condition that can result from chronic diarrhea. Inammation in the perianal area results in thickened (lichenied) and cracked, exco­riated skin (Fig.20.8). Treatment is focused
on controlling the frequency of bowel movements. Loperamide and silver sulfa­diazine can be used with addition of low dose hydrocortisone for more severe cases.
Lichen sclerosis (formerly lichen et atro- phicus) presents mainly in women with a thinning and wrinkling of the perianal skin, also known as a “cigarette-paper” appearance (Fig. 20.9). This also classi­cally affects the labial skin and perineum. Lichen sclerosis may be associated with squamous cell carcinoma. Thus, the affected area should be examined at least annually and a biopsy should be consid­ered for any suspicious lesions. Treatment is a topical glucocorticoid like clobetasol propionate 0.05% for 6–8 weeks. Tacrolimus has also been used for this condition.
Contact dermatitis is a result of a mechan­ical or chemical irritant that may act as an allergen. Some soaps, cleansers, alcohol and feces can cause macular erythema, hyperkeratosis, and ssuring (Fig.20.10). Patch testing by an allergist or dermatolo­gist can be useful to determine if there is an inciting allergen, especially in severe or refractory contact dermatitis. Treatment is Sitz baths with or without vinegar, low dose hydrocortisone, oral steroids, or antihistamines.
• Pruritus ani with thickened skin and leath­ery patches may suggest atopic dermati-
164
B. L. Bello and K. Umanskiy
Fig. 20.7 Psoriasis around anus and intergluteal cleft. Courtesy of Lee Smith, MD
tis. This is often hereditary and presents at an earlier age than other causes of pruri­tus. In addition to the anus, this can be seen in the neck, antecubital, and popliteal fossas. Treatment is with a topical barrier like petroleum jelly, and anti-inamma­tory drugs and antihistamines.
G. Systemic causes of pruritus ani include diabe-
tes mellitus, leukemia and lymphoma, cho­lestasis, thyrotoxicosis, and psychiatric illnesses. Anxiety, stress, fatigue, and obses­sive compulsive tendencies have been shown to play a role. Often a generalized pruritus is noted in these systemic conditions. Treatment should focus on disease-specic interventions. Systemic medications such as antibiotics (tet­racycline and colchicine), quinidine, and pep­permint oil have been implicated as well.
H. Local irritants are often the cause of anal
itching. Several of these have been discussed above under contact dermatitis. Fecal seep-
Fig. 20.8 Lichen simplex chronicus. (With permission from Finne CO, Fenyk JR.Dermatology and Pruritus Ani. In: Beck DE, Roberts PL, Saclarides TJ, et al., editors. The ASCRS Textbook of Colon and Rectal Surgery. 2nd edn. 2011 © Springer publishing)
Fig. 20.9 Lichen sclerosis. Courtesy of Lee Smith, MD
age is the most common irritant responsible for pruritus. This is further exacerbated by excessive soaps and wiping in an effort to clean the perianal region. Anal seepage can be exacerbated by certain foods that can alter the pH of the stool or lower sphincter tone. In addition, ill-tting, synthetic clothes and top-
20 Anal Conditions: Pruritus Ani
Fig. 20.10 Contact dermatitis. (With permission from Smith L. Perianal Dermatologic Disease. In Gordon PH and Nivatvong S, editors. Principles and Practices of Surgery for the Colon, Rectum, and Anus. 3rd edn. 2007 © Informa Healthcare publishing)
ical creams can trap moisture around the anus. Treatment involves removing the offending agent, keeping the area dry (cotton ball or folded cotton gauze), and avoiding further trauma to the skin. In the case of fecal seepage, bulking agents are an effective rst line treatment.
I. Colorectal and anal specic causes of pruri-
tus ani include hemorrhoids, ssure, stula­in- ano, dysplasia, and malignancy. 6–11% of patients with pruritus ani can have an underlying cancer. This underscores the importance of considering an endoscopy as part of the diagnostic workup. The mainstay of treatment is addressing the primary cause.
J. Despite extensive work up, no clear etiology
of pruritus ani can be identied in up to 25% of patients. These cases are classied as idio- pathic, or primary, pruritus ani and are con­sidered as a diagnosis of exclusion.
165
K. The majority of patients with either second-
ary or primary pruritus ani will benet from simple, general principles including improv­ing anal hygiene, removing any potential inciting agents, food education, and improv­ing bowel habit. These interventions can be effective in up to 90% idiopathic cases.
Inciting agents: Any inciting factors, mechanical or chemical irritants, trauma, and scratching should be avoided.
Hygiene: Sitz baths without additives after defecation often helps keep the peri­anal clean. Bidets are becoming more popular as an alternative. Patients should be counseled to avoid soaps, scrubbing, and aggressive wiping. Excessive mois­ture can cause hygiene problems. Blotting with damp toilet paper should be used instead of a moist wipe. Using a hair dryer on the lowest setting or dabbing with a towel is also benecial. Light cotton as undergarments should be used instead of tight tting, synthetic underwear. A dry cotton ball or gauze placed at the anus can be used to limit moisture in the area. As a general rule, topical creams should be avoided initially as they may trap moisture.
Food education: Patients may benet from avoiding coffee, cola, beer, toma­toes, chocolate, tea, citrus, and lactose containing foods.
Bowel habit: High ber diet and bulking agents are helpful to in absorbing water from stool, in turn decreasing fecal seep­age. Antidiarrheals such as loperamide or atropine/diphenoxylate are recommended if needed.
If following these simple, general prin­ciples is not successful after four to six weeks, a short-course trial of a low­potency topical steroid (1% hydrocorti­sone) can be tried twice a day for two weeks. This should be tapered off using a barrier cream containing zinc oxide to prevent skin atrophy.
L. Clinicians should be prepared to manage
refractory pruritus ani if there is no resolu-
166
B. L. Bello and K. Umanskiy
tion of symptoms despite previous treatment. Repeating a thorough history may identify an inciting event that may have not been identi­ed initially. Journals with foods and/or tim­ing of symptoms can demonstrate a temporal relation to onset of symptoms. A biopsy and endoscopy should be performed if they were not done at the initial evaluation. Similar to initial evaluation, the focus should be on nding an underlying cause. These patients will need to be counseled that refractory pru­ritus ani may be a chronic condition requir­ing a long-term treatment plan and their expectations need to be set that treatments are aimed at improving symptoms rather than complete resolution. Capsaicin, anal tattoo­ing, and tacrolimus are effective in the man­agement of refractory pruritus ani.
M. Capsaicin is chili pepper extract and works
by depleting substance P and damaging C-ber terminals, the bers that mediate itch signaling (Fig. 20.2). A temporary burning sensation replaces the overwhelm­ing urge to scratch. Lysy etal. (2003) per­formed a randomized, control trial on capsaicin versus menthol as placebo in patients with idiopathic refractory pruritus ani. Patients kept a 28day symptom diary and scored their symptoms on a 1 to 5 point scale. Capsaicin 0.006% for four weeks was shown to improve these itching and burning sensation scores in 75% of patients when compared to placebo.
N. Anal tattooing involves the intradermal injec-
tion of methylene blue which destroys der­mal nerve endings. The solution has been modied to avoid skin necrosis which was reported in up to 25% patients. The perianal area is injected with 10ml of 1% methylene blue plus 5 ml normal saline plus 7.5 ml
0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine plus
7.5ml of 0.5% lidocaine. The tattoo disap­pears in about three to four weeks. Patients can sometimes have prolonged numbness around the area or see bluish urine initially. Transient fecal incontinence has also been described. In several retrospective studies,
Table 20.1 Summary of Studies on Anal Tattooing
Number of
Author and Year Eusebio etal.
1990 Farouk and
Lee 1997
Mentes etal. 2004
Sutherland etal. 2009
Samalavicius etal. 2012
Table 20.2 Summary of Studies on Tacrolimus
Author and Year
Suys 2012
Ucak etal. 2013
patients Key ndings 21 100% had improvement
in symptoms
6 83% had improvement in
symptoms; 50% needed a second injection
30 93% had improvement in
symptoms (5 pts required an additional treatment); 76% had complete resolution at 12months
49 96% had improvement in
symptoms (4 pts required an additional treatment); 57% had complete resolution at 8weeks
10 100% had improvement
in symptoms at 4weeks; 20% had complete resolution at 5years
Number of patients Key ndings
21 68% had improvement in
symptoms at 2weeks
32 80% had improvement in
symptoms at 4weeks;
18.75% had complete resolution at 18weeks
approximately 80–100% of patients had some improvement, while 20–80% patients had complete resolution of pruritus ani on long-term follow up (Table 20.1). A second injection may sometimes be helpful.
O. Tacrolimus 0.03–0.1% is a non- corticosteroid,
macrolide anti-inammatory and has recently been studied in small series. This agent may be a good alternative to topical steroids or as a replacement when tapering off steroids to help avoid skin atrophy. Two studies have shown an improvement in itch intensity, itch frequency, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), a quality-of-life questionnaire (Table20.2).
20 Anal Conditions: Pruritus Ani
167

Suggested Reading

Eusebio EB, Graham J, Mody N.Treatment of intractable
pruritus ani. Dis Colon Rectum. 1990;33(9):770–2.
Farouk R, Lee PW.Intradermal methylene blue injection
for the treatment of intractable idiopathic pruritus ani. Br J Surg. 1997;84(5):670.
Gaertner WB, Melton GB. Dermatology and pruritus
ani. In: Steele SR, Hull TL, Read TE, Saclarides TJ, Senagore AJ, Whitlow CB, editors. The ASCRS text­book of colon and rectal surgery. 3rd ed. NewYork: Springer publishing; 2016.
Lysy J, Sistiery-Ittah M, Israelit Y, Shmueli A,
Strauss- Liviatan N, Mindrul V, Keret D, Goldin E. Topical capsaicin—a novel and effective treat­ment for idiopathic intractable pruritus ani: a ran­domised, placebo controlled, crossover study. Gut. 2003;52(9):1323–6.
Mentes BB, Akin M, Leventoglu S, Gultekin FA, Oguz
M.Intradermal methylene blue injection for the treat-
ment of intractable idiopathic pruritus ani: results of 30 cases. Tech Coloproctol. 2004;8(1):11–4.
Samalavicius NE, Poskus T, Gupta RK, Lunevicius R.Long-
term results of single intradermal 1% methylene blue injection for intractable idiopathic pruritus ani: a pro­spective study. Tech Coloproctol. 2012;16(4):295–9.
Smith LE.Perianal dermatologic conditions. In: Gordon
PH, Nivatvong S, editors. Principles and practices of surgery for the colon, rectum, and anus. 3rd ed. London: Informa Healthcare publishing; 2007.
Sutherland AD, Faragher IG, Frizelle FA. Intradermal
injection of methylene blue for the treatment of refrac­tory pruritus ani. Color Dis. 2009;11(3):282–7.
Suys E.Randomized study of topical tacrolimus ointment
as possible treatment for resistant idiopathic pruritus ani. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66(2):327–8.
Ucak H, Demir B, Cicek D, Dertlioglu SB, Akkurt ZM,
Ucmak D, Halisdemir N. Efcacy of topical tacro­limus for the treatment of persistent pruritus ani in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2013;24(6):454–7.

Anal Conditions: Hidradenitis Suppurativa

H.HandeAydinli andEmreGorgun
21
Refer toAlgorithm in Fig.21.1
A. Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic,
progressive inammatory disease of the apo­crine gland-bearing skin that most commonly effects axillary (Fig.21.2b) and perianal areas (Fig. 21.2d). Overall, ~30% to 50% of patients with HS have perianal lesions although the inguinal (Fig.21.2c) and infra­mammary (Fig. 21.2a) regions can be involved as well. Perianal HS commonly appears as a single lesion or combined with bilateral axillary lesions. Early signs include open comedones (clogged hair follicle) and tender subcutaneous papules (Fig. 21.2a). Additional inammatory nodules can subse­quently form and progress to painful draining abscesses, sinus tracts (Fig.21.2d) and scar­ring. The skin lesions can interfere with activ­ities of daily living and be difcult to heal. Patients with severe disease commonly suffer from poor quality of life and sexual dysfunction.
The worldwide prevalence is 0.1 to 4% and females are more likely to be affected. The mean age of onset is 20 to 24years, and advanced age is correlated with disease sever­ity. Cigarette smoking and obesity are known
H. H. Aydinli · E. Gorgun (*) Department ofColorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA e-mail: gorgune@ccf.org
risk factors. Dietary triggers include dairy products and highly rened simple carbohy­drates. The pathophysiology of the disease still remains controversial. The most accepted theory is that follicular epithelial hyperplasia and infundibular hyperkeratosis lead to fol­licular occlusion, which subsequently causes secondary inammation of the apocrine glands. Endocrine and genetic factors have been proposed as well.
B. Diagnosing the disease can be challenging
due to the absence of a pathognomonic test. The reported median delay between the appearance of initial symptoms and diagnosis changes from 2.3±5years (mean ± SD) to 12years. In some cases, non-specic lesions can be confused for other skin conditions such as simple infections or anogenital Crohn’s disease, especially if patients seek care from a number of providers and care points, including general care practitioners and emergency rooms. Also, not all patients present for care, initially. Diagnosis is made clinically based on the presence of typical lesions, the distribution patterns of these lesions and a history of recurrent disease. Physical examination is the most important part of the evaluation. Findings generally include skin thickening, induration, abscess formation, draining sinuses and contractures. There are no diagnostic imaging or laboratory studies specic for HS.Ultrasonography can
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 S. R. Steele etal. (eds.), Clinical Decision Making in Colorectal Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65942-8_21
169
170
Fig. 21.1 Algorithm for the evaluation and management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)
H. H. Aydinli and E. Gorgun
be used to evaluate skin lesions typically s­tulous tracts and brotic scarring in lesions, which might be worse prognostic factors in terms of response to the medical treatment. With perianal lesions, the extent of the dis­ease might not always appreciated with phys­ical examination; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may therefore be necessary. Pelvic MRI may show the extent of the peri­anal disease and helps exclude Crohn’s dis­ease by revealing anorectal stulizing disease. In patients with perianal HS, MRI typically shows subcutaneous edema with possible supercial sinus tracts; the anal sphincter and levator plate are usually not involved. Patients with severe disease should be evaluated for sepsis with basic laboratory assessment including a complete blood cell count with differential, and basic metabolic prole with C-reactive protein. Biopsy and culture may be benecial in certain instances of refractory or atypical disease. According to the stage of the disease process, typical pathology shows
hyperkeratosis and occlusion of hair follicles, peri-folliculitis, and invasion of the dermis by inammatory cells, granulation tissue and giant cells. It is important to use biopsies exclude SCC in chronic cases.
C. A number of diseases should be considered in
the differential diagnosis including; acne, actinomycosis, anal stula, carbuncles, cat scratch disease, cellulitis, Crohn’s disease, dermoid cyst, granuloma inguinale, erysipe­las, furuncules, inamed epidermoid cyst, lymphadenopathy, lymphogranuloma vene­reum, perirectal abscess, pilonidal disease, and tuberculosis abscess.
D. Different classication/scoring systems have
been created to assess disease severity. The Hurley classication system is the most com­monly used due to its simplicity (Table 21.1). For a more detailed categorization and/or research purposes, the Sartorius system and latent classication systems were established over time (Tables 21.2 and 21.3). The Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response
cd
21 Anal Conditions: Hidradenitis Suppurativa
a b
171
Fig. 21.2 (a) HS inframammary region comedones and inammation, (b) Left axillary region abscesses, sinus tracts and scarring, (c) inguinal and suprapubic region
(HiSCR) is a newer and well-accepted method of assessing the clinical response to medical treatment in patients with HS. The HiSCR typically assesses three lesions including abscesses (uctuant, with or with­out drainage, tender or painful), inamma­tory nodules (tender, erythematous, pyogenic granuloma lesion) and draining stulas (sinus tracts, with communications to skin surface,
lesions with extensive inammation, (d) perianal region with abscesses and sinus tracts with seton placement
draining purulent uid). A clinically mean­ingful response is dened as a 50% reduction in inammatory lesion count (abscesses and inammatory nodules) and no increase in the number of abscesses and draining stulas when compared from baseline.
E. Several comorbid disorders are correlated
with HS including inammatory bowel dis­eases (IBD)—mainly Crohn’s disease—