Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_837_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
38 Мб
Скачать
33 Pelvic Floor Conditions: Fecal Incontinence
H.Sphincter Replacement
If an overt sphincter injury is found, whether from traumatic accident, foreign body or other etiology, attempts at more conservative measures, such as SNS should be employed rst. If these measures fail, surgical reconstruction of the sphincter may be required. The prognosis in such cases with sphincter repair alone are poor, but the function and physical nature of the cerclage that the sphinc­ter complex creates is a necessary part recreating continence in this group of patients. As indicated above, early post-obstetric injury represents one of the few etiologies that may result in good long­term function with sphincter repair alone.
Sphincter Replacement Options
• Graciloplasty ± Dynamic Neuromodulation (not available in the USA at the time of publication)
• Gluteoplasty
• Articial Bowel Sphincter (not available in the USA at the time of publication)
• Magnetic Anal Sphincter (not available in the USA at the time of publication)
261
Fig. 33.7 Graciloplasty: This technique involves har­vesting and transposing the gracilis muscle as a proxi­mally pedicled ap. The muscle is tunneled around the sphincter complex and sutured in place. (With permission from Baeten C, Breukink S. Dynamic graciloplasty. In: Wexner SD, Fleshman D (eds). Master Techniques in Surgery. Colon and Rectal Surgery. Anorectal Operations. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia, 2012)
Graciloplasty
In the patient with an unreconstructable sphinc­ter disruption, sphincteroplasty may be impossi­ble. In such cases, dynamic or stimulated graciloplasty has shown signicant improve­ment in quality of life and incontinence symp­toms. The gracilis muscle is harvested, tunneled around the sphincter, and sutured in place. In the unstimulated approach, patients learn to volun­tarily contract this muscle to improve conti­nence. In the dynamic version of graciloplasty, neuromodulation stimulates the fast-twitch skel­etal muscle of the gracilis neo-sphincter to con­vert to slow twitch muscle bers improving functional outcome of the reconstruction. Unfortunately, there are very few centers with expertise in this technique, and referral to cen­ters of excellence is required (Figs. 33.7 and
33.8).
Fig. 33.8 Graciloplasty. In the superior stimulated ver­sion, neuromodulation is employed to convert the fast twitch skeletal muscle to slow twitch, resulting in rela­tively tonic contraction. (With permission from Baeten C, Breukink S. Dynamic graciloplasty. In: Wexner SD, Fleshman D (eds). Master Techniques in Surgery. Colon and Rectal Surgery. Anorectal Operations. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia, 2012)
Gluteoplasty
Using the gluteal muscles in a similar fashion to the gracilis muscle in the graciloplasty, func­tional skeletal muscle is wrapped around the sphincter complex. Contraction of the new
262
M. T. M. O’Donnell and J. I. S. Bleier
sphincter complex is achieved during ambula­tion. There has been marginal success with this surgery.
Articial Bowel Sphincter (ABS)/ Magnetic Anal Sphincter (MAS)
Healthy patients with severe FI despite trial of other modalities and sufcient healthy soft tissue surrounding their anal canal can be considered for sphincter replacement. Compared to the sur­gical sphincter reconstruction, replacement of the sphincter through articial implantable devices may be more appropriate in the otherwise healthy patient who has failed medical management, SNS, and undergoes EAUS to demonstrate an unreconstructable sphincter. Contraindications include history of pelvic irradiation, IBD, diabe­tes, and immunosuppression.
The ABS is an inatable cuff tunneled and
xed around the anal canal through perineal inci­sions. The cuff is kept full during resting state to retain continence and when the patient needs to evacuate, he or she can actively pump uid from the cuff to the reservoir implanted in the space of Retzius through a pump within the labia majora or scrotum. The cuff then passively rells with uid after evacuation over 8–10min.
This modality has been plagued with unreli-
able success and unacceptably high rates of com­plications—both related to patient morbidity and device failure. Although highly effective in cer­tain cases, it is no longer currently available in the United States.
The magnetic anal sphincter (MAS) is a device
consisting of small magnets on a exible string. This is implanted around the anal sphincter, tun­neled optimally just below the puborectalis mus­cle. The number of magnets is selected by the surgeon to provide complete occlusion of the anal canal as they are attracted to each other at rest. During defecation, Valsalva pressure forces the magnets apart, allowing the stool bolus to be evac­uated. Unfortunately the MAS is not available in the USA at the time of publication.
J.Ostomy
Patients with fecal incontinence refractory to all other interventions may be offered stoma forma­tion as it can ameliorate perianal hygiene difcul­ties and provide more manageable control of fecal material. Patients who are wheelchair­bound or paraplegic may desire this option because the location of the stoma is easier to take care of independently. An end sigmoid colostomy should be considered in most patients, except those with slow colonic transit time. Patients with chronic constipation or slow colonic transit time are likely better served by creation of an ileos­tomy. Satisfaction rates in patients with FI who receive an ostomy are high.

∗Other Therapies

The following therapies have shown some prom­ise as less invasive methods for improving fecal incontinence, but require further long-term study. These should be considered in patients who are not interested in SNS or desire non-surgical options.
Injectables
Surgical repair of internal anal sphincter defects has not been shown to be effective in isolation, and thus injection of biocompatible material into the intersphincteric or submucosal plane has been used for the treatment of minor fecal incontinence. The therapeutic goal is aimed at increasing the bulk of tissue in the anal canal, resulting in more effective physical occlusion. A number of materials have been used includ­ing autologous fat, collagen, non-animal stabi­lized dextranomer in hyaluronic acid (NASHA Dx- Solesta NC), and carbon- coated beads (Durasphere EXP®, Coloplast Corp., Minneapolis, MN). Ultrasound-guided delivery of the bulking agents has been shown to be more effective than digitally-guided injection. Durable ef-
®
; Salix Pharmaceuticals, Raleigh,
33 Pelvic Floor Conditions: Fecal Incontinence
263
cacy has been demonstrated with Solesta at 24 and 36months with over half of patients expe­riencing a greater than 50% reduction in the number of FI episodes. However, long- term studies are needed.
RF Remodeling
The Secca® procedure involves the delivery of radiofrequency energy as an alternating current to generate thermal energy within the anal canal to induce collagen ber remodeling within the sphincter complex. The initial therapy was based on the theory that scarication causes a relative physiologic obstruction, thus improving control, however, interestingly, newer studies involving histologic assessment of tissue after RF therapy has revealed that the previously damaged sphinc­ter muscle actually becomes more normal appear­ing after remodeling rather than simply forming scar.

Conclusion

In summary, a detailed history can often reveal the etiology of fecal incontinence in patients and all therapy should be individualized based upon the cause when possible. The majority of patients will improve with non-surgical management of diet modication, ber supplementation and anti- diarrheal, slowing medications. The remain­der of patients may benet from one or more of the surgical interventions described, which should be tailored to the etiology of the FI and the wishes and comorbidities of the patient.
Sacral nerve stimulation has emerged as a reli­able treatment for a number of cause of FI and should be incorporated in the armamentarium of the Colorectal surgeon. Knowledge regarding all of the techniques available is important in this often underdiagnosed and difcult to treat problem.
Acknowledgements Disclosures: J Bleier has served as a proctor for Medtronic. The authors have no other relevant afliations or nancial involvement with any organization or entity with a nancial interest in or nancial conict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the man­uscript apart from those disclosed.

Suggested Reading

Brown HW, Wexner SD, Segall MM, Brezoczky KL,
Lukacz ES. Accidental bowel leakage in the mature women’s health study: prevalence and predictors. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66:1101–8.
Madoff RD, Parker SC, Varma MG, Lowry AC. Faecal
incontinence in adults. Lancet. 2004;364:621–32.
Paquette IM, Bordeianou L.Evaluation and treatment of
FI.In: Steele S, Hull T, Hyman N, Maykel J, Read T, Whitlow C, editors. The ASCRS manual of colon and rectal surgery. Cham: Springer; 2019. p.1091–105.
Paquette IM, Varma MG, Kaiser AM, Steele SR, Rafferty
JF. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons’ clinical practice guideline for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Practice parameters. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58(7):623–36.
Tjandra JJ, Dykes SL, Kumar RR, etal. Practice parame-
ters for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:1497–507.
Wald A.Clinical practice. Fecal incontinence in adults. N
Engl J Med. 2007;356:1648–55.
Wexner SD, Bleier JI.Current surgical strategies to treat
fecal incontinence. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;9(12):1577–89.
Wexner SD, Fleshman JD, editors. Master techniques in
surgery. Colon and rectal surgery: anorectal opera­tions. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters-Kluwer; 2012.

Pelvic Floor Conditions: Diarrhea

RebeccaRhee andAnnaSerur
34

Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 34.1

A. Pelvic oor dysfunction refers to a broad
group of disorders that are caused by abnor­malities in the muscles and joints of the pelvic oor (Table 34.1). Patients can present with defecatory problems with either inability to empty or to store the stool, pelvic pain or pres­sure and occasionally gross organ protrusion. Fecal incontinence, although not life threaten­ing, can lead to signicant disability and psy­chological trauma. It is more prevalent in the elderly and in hospitalized individuals. The prevalence of fecal incontinence in the non­institutionalized patients in the United States is estimated to be 8.3%, and consists of liquid stool in 6.2%, solid stool in 1.6%, and mucus in 3.1%. It occurs at least weekly in 2.7%, with 0.9% of patients experiencing it daily. Loose or watery stools are an independent risk factor in both men and women.
B. Fecal incontinence is dened as accidental
passage of stool or mucus from the rectum without patient’s knowledge, or without vol-
R. Rhee Division ofColorectal Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
A. Serur (*) Department ofColorectal Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA e-mail: aserur@maimonidesmed.org
untary contraction, or both. Diarrhea is a very common cause of fecal incontinence. When a patient develops diarrhea, the colonic transit time is increased and the anorectal sensation may be diminished leading to quick evacuation. Fecal incontinence with diarrhea may occur even in patients with intact sphinc­ters and no neurologic dysfunction. Anal sphincter pressure has to be much higher in order to hold the liquid stool and allow for controlled evacuation.
C. Evaluation of patients with fecal inconti-
nence and diarrhea include a thorough his­tory and physical exam, including obstetric history, other co-morbid conditions, history of injury to the sphincters, neurologic insults as well as the duration of symptoms, history of travel, dietary habits. A physician evaluat­ing a patient with fecal incontinence may request the patient to keep a stool diary. A sample may be found on a website www.
bowelcontrol.nih.gov. Another tool to evalu-
ate patients with fecal incontinence and diar­rhea is the validated Bristol Scale (Fig.34.2). The validated Bristol Stool scale consists of seven descriptions of stool characteristics and helps to objectively determine the patient’s stool consistency. It is friendly to use and includes pictures of each stool type.
D. The rst step in the evaluation of diarrhea is
to rule out an infectious cause. Stool cultures should be tested for ova and parasites, CMV
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 S. R. Steele etal. (eds.), Clinical Decision Making in Colorectal Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65942-8_34
265
266
R. Rhee and A . Serur
Fig. 34.1 Diarrhea evaluation algorithm. IBD inammatory bowel disease
Table 34.1 Causes of pelvic oor dysfunction
Fecal incontinence Constipation Rectocele Paradoxical puborectalis contraction Pelvic pain syndromes: Levator syndrome Coccydynia Proctalgia fugax Pudendal neuralgia
and bacterial infections. Additionally, fecal leukocytes can indicate an infectious or inammatory condition. C. difcile may be separately tested for one of the available stool studies (e.g., toxin, PCR).
E. Fecal incontinence with diarrhea may be
caused by a rectal mass or a large rectal polyp. It is essential that the patients with FI have either a full colonoscopy or a sigmoid­oscopy if a full colonoscopy was performed within a year.
F. There is a battery of tests used to evaluate
patients with fecal incontinence. Anal manometry, PTNML, and anal electromyog­raphy are very helpful in trying to determine treatment for a particular patient. Anal manometry is used to evaluate the resting and squeeze pressures of the sphincter muscles as well as rectal compliance and rectal capacity. There are poor established parameters for
normal pressures. According to the Cleveland Clinic Florida-Fecal Incontinence Scale (CCF-FIS), normal resting pressures are 40–70 mm Hg (55–95 cm water). Normal squeeze pressures are 100–180mm Hg (136– 244cm water). Women generally have lower resting and squeeze pressures than men. There is no correlation between low pres­sures and surgical outcomes. However, pres­sures can be used for comparisons before and after therapy. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PTNML) is another test used for evaluation of patients with fecal inconti­nence. It assesses the neuromuscular integ­rity of the pelvic oor by measuring the length of time required for a xed electrical stimulus to conduct along the pudendal nerve and cause muscle contraction. Normal latency is considered to be 2ms (SD, 0.2ms). Latency is prolonged in patients with damage to the neuromuscular unit. The PTNML appears to be the most signicant predictor of functional outcome after sphincteroplasty. In patients with a neurologic condition or insult, anal electromyography can quantitate the sphincter dysfunction. It can assess the extent of damage secondary to the neurologic condition and help in identifying other con­ditions responsible for fecal incontinence. Needle electrodes are inserted directly into the sphincter muscle and the patient is asked
clear cut edges
clear cut edges
pieces
34 Pelvic Floor Conditions: Diarrhea
267
Separate, hard
lumps
Soft blobs with
Fig. 34.2 Bristol Stool Scale. The seven types of stool are (1) Type 1: Separate hard lumps, like nuts (hard to pass), (2) Type 2: Sausage-shaped, but lumpy, (3) Type 3: Like a sausage but with cracks on its surface, (4) Type 4:
Sausage-like
but lumpy
Soft blobs with
to contract the muscle as when holding a stool and then relax it.
G. Endoanal ultrasound is a great tool to assess
the external and internal sphincter muscle. It gives a real-time, 3-D picture and has a very high specicity and sensitivity, 98–100% for the external sphincter and 95.5% for the internal sphincter. Three regions are exam­ined: the most distal anal canal where only the external sphincter muscle is present, the mid anal canal visualizing both internal and external sphincter and the proximal anal canal-the level of the pubococcygeus muscle. The normal thickness of the external sphinc­ter muscle is ~8.3 mm (95% condence interval [CI], 7.6–9mm). Mean internal anal sphincter thickness is described as 6.5 mm (95% CI, 5.8–7.2 mm). Tjandra and col­leagues found EAUS to be more accurate than EMG in evaluating sphincter defects and more comfortable for the patient.
H. Defecography or MRI defecography is used
to evaluate rectal emptying as well as ability to be able to hold the stool. While not a tradi­tional component of a diarrhea evaluation, It may be helpful in diagnosis of rectal prolapse,
Like a sausage,
but with cracks
on surface
Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft, (5) Type 5: Soft blobs with clear cut edges (passed easily), (6) Type 6: Fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool, and (7) Type 7: Watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid
Like a sausage or
snake, smooth and
soft
Watery, no solid
rectocele, cystocele and internal prolapse— conditions that can lead to symptoms of diar­rhea. Most patients with incontinence have a hard time tolerating this procedure. A pelvic mass can cause an extrinsic compression on the rectum, causing urgency and inconti­nence. Pelvic MRI is an excellent tool in diagnosing this problem.
Refer to Algorithm in Fig.34.3
I. Treating the cause of diarrhea, increasing the
consistency of the stool and slowing down the transit time may lead to improvement in patient’s fecal incontinence. Treatment of fecal incontinence with diarrhea ranges from dietary modication to anti-diarrheal medi­cine to surgical options. Medical manage­ment should be exhausted prior to recommending surgical alternatives.
J. Dietary modication is the rst step in treat-
ment of diarrhea. Patients should avoid foods such as dairy products, caffeine, spicy foods, and should increase intake of ber-rich foods, including fruits, vegetables, nuts and
268
Fig. 34.3 Diarrhea management algorithm
R. Rhee and A . Serur
whole grains. A diet should include soluble and insoluble ber and adequate amount of uids.
K. Patients should be instructed to take a ber
supplement such as Metamucil, Fibercon, Beneber, etc. As each of these vary in their taste, consistency, and amount of ber per scoop/pill/wafer, it is important to ensure patients are instructed in goals for intake.
L. Constipating medicines such as Loperamide
or diphenoxylate with atropine are the next step in treating incontinence with chronic diarrhea. Both of these medications can be given up to 4 times a day, 30 min before meals, and once before sleep. Cholestyramine and Tincture of Opium can be added to the regimen if Loperamide and diphenoxylate with atropine fails to solidify the stool. Ondansetron has been shown to be effective in Irritable Bowel Syndrome with diarrhea. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo­controlled trial of 120 patients with Rome III criteria for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome, 4mg dose led to improved stool consistency, decreased number of days with urgency, improved urgency scores, and decreased frequency of defecation. Amitriptyline is another drug that improves diarrhea and decreases rectal urgency.
M. Skin barriers and creams should be used to
decrease secondary morbidity of diarrhea. Balneol lotion and Calmoseptine ointment
are very effective in creating a protective bar­rier and avoiding irritation and skin break down. Patients should be counseled about avoidance of wipes and prolonged use of ste­roid creams.
N. Developing a regular bowel routine is
referred to as bowel training. Bowel training is a difcult task for patients who have diar­rhea and takes weeks to months to develop but is possible. It works very well in patients with constipation and overow incontinence. Daily enemas or rectal washout can be done daily or twice a day in order to facilitate bowel training.
O. Pelvic oor exercises and biofeedback ther-
apy uses audiovisual cues to change patient’s bowel habits. It requires a motivated patient and a motivated therapist. Very few studies have been done to support its efcacy. Many different techniques have been described leading to inconsistent treatment, and the evidence for long-term effect is poor.
P. Anal plug is another modality that can be
used to improve patients’ quality of life but not to eliminate the problem. A Cochrane review of four studies with 136 patients noticed improvement in patients with minor leakage. However, approximately one-third of patients did not tolerate the plug, discon­tinuing its use.
Q. SECCA procedure was introduced in 2002. It
involves application of temperature-
34 Pelvic Floor Conditions: Diarrhea
269
controlled radiofrequency energy to the anal canal. The mechanism of its action is not clear but it does improve the sphincter function and anorectal sensitivity. A review of 10 studies with 200 patients demonstrated its efcacy in mild to moderate incontinence with improvement in CCF/Wexner inconti­nence and quality of life scores.
R. Non-absorbable bulking agents injectable
(Solesta) is composed of sodium hyaluronate and dextranomer. It was approved by the FDA for the treatment of fecal incontinence in 2011. It is injected into the submucosa of the upper anal canal bulking it up. The com­pound also promotes broblast and collagen growth. In a multicenter study, 62.7% of patients experienced more than 50% reduc­tion in both solid and liquid stool inconti­nence episodes. NASHA/Dx was found to be effective and safe over a 24-month period.
S. Depending on the etiology of incontinence,
surgery can be the primary modality or the treatment of last resort. Neuromodulation, overlapping sphincteroplasty, articial bowel sphincter and diversion with ileostomy/colos­tomy are existing options for patients.
Fecal Incontinence is a chronic life-long disease that can be a result of congenital or acquired conditions. The goal of treatment is to improve patient’s quality of life and not necessarily cure the disease. The most fre­quent type of Fecal Incontinence is the loss of liquid stool. Chronic diarrhea is a factor
that can be modied by patients with fecal incontinence leading to better control and thus better quality of life.

Suggested Reading

Alavi K, Chan S, Wise P, Bordeianou L, et al. Fecal
incontinence: etiology, diagnosis, and management. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(10):1910–21.
Deuekom M, Dobben AC. Plugs for containing fae-
cal incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;4:CD005086.
Ditah I, Devaki P, Luma HN, et al. Clin Gastroenterol
Hepatol. 2014;12(4):636–43.
Duelund-Jakobsen J, Worsoe J, Lundby L, et al.
Management of patients with faecal incontinence. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2016;9(1):86–97.
Frascio M, Mandolno F, Imperatore M, Wexner SD,
etal. The SECCA procedure for faecal incontinence: a review. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16(3):167–72.
Gantke B, Schafer A, Enck P, Lubke HJ. Sonographic,
manometric, and myographic evaluation of the anal sphincters morphology and function. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36(11):1037–41.
Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal
incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36(1):77–97.
La Torre F, de la Portilla F. Long-term efcacy of dex-
tranomer in stabilized hyaluronic acid (NASHA/Dx) for treatment of faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(5):569–74.
Ng KS, Sivakumaran Y, Nassar N, Gladman MA.
Fecal Incontinence: Community Prevalence and Associated Factors–A Systematic Review. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58(12):1194–209. https://doi.
org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000514. Review.
Whitehead WE, Borrud L, Goode PS, etal. Fecal inconti-
nence in the US Adults: epidemiology and risk factors. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(2):512–7.

Chronic Constipation

PaulaI.Denoya andSyedK.Abbas
35

Introduction

Constipation is one of the more prevalent gastro­intestinal complaints in the general population. One out of six adults suffers with this condition in varying degrees. According to the Rome IV criteria, constipation is dened as the presence of two or more of the following symptoms that occur in more than 25% of defecations: straining during defecation, sensation of stool in the rectal vault after defecation, sensation of obstruction or blockage, passage of lumpy and/or hard stools, need for manual maneuvers to facilitate defeca­tion (such as digital evacuation and perineal sup­port during defecation), and less than three spontaneous bowel movements per week. These symptoms must be present for at least three months with onset of symptoms at least six months prior to diagnosis. In patients with irrita­ble bowel syndrome, the criteria for constipation have not been clearly dened. Patients do not meet the criteria of constipation if they exhibit symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome, such as abdominal pain that is relieved with defecation, unpredictable stool frequency, and variable stool forms with defecation (varies between diarrhea and hardened stool). Furthermore, patients with
P. I. Denoya (*) · S. K. Abbas Department ofSurgery, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, USA e-mail: paula.denoya@stonybrookmedicine.edu
constipation rarely have loose stools without the use of laxatives.
The most common causes of constipation are insufcient uid or ber intake and poor bowel habits. When examining the other causes, consti­pation can be categorized into primary and sec­ondary causes. Primary causes of constipation are divided into normal transit constipation (NTC), slow transit constipation (STC), and def­ecatory disorders.
In NTC, patients will report symptoms of con­stipation while having normal passage of stool through the colon. The symptoms in NTC tend to be associated with psychosocial stress.
In STC, patients have normal colonic transit at rest, but have decreased or absent colonic motil­ity after meals or blunted responses to laxatives and cholinergic medications. It is suspected that there is a possible dysfunction in the enteric nerve plexus or the interstitial cells of Cajal.
Defecatory disorders are characterized by abnormalities in the pelvic oor muscles. Dyssynergia is the impaired relaxation or inappro­priate contraction of the puborectalis and external anal sphincter muscles during defecation. When these muscles contract, the anorectal angle is nar­rowed, increasing the anal canal pressures and pre­venting effective defecation. Abnormally elevated resting pressures in the anal canal due to anal sphincter muscle spasms denes anismus, which can also cause constipation. Structural abnormali­ties, such as megacolon and megarectum, can fall
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 S. R. Steele etal. (eds.), Clinical Decision Making in Colorectal Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65942-8_35
271
272
P. I. Denoya and S. K. Abbas
under defecatory disorders. The dilation and dis­tension of the colon or rectum can be attributed to neurologic dysfunction or chronic fecal retention and impaction (Table35.1).
There are a wide variety of secondary causes of constipation. The most common manifestations of secondary constipation are multifactorial and involve multiple organ systems, including neuro­logic, psychiatric, metabolic, endocrine, autoim­mune, and congenital. Furthermore, mechanical obstructions from benign and malignant patholo­gies can present as constipation, such as recto­celes, rectal prolapse, intussusception, colonic lesions like adenocarcinoma and polyps, and colon or anorectal strictures. Medications that cause con­stipation as a side effect are analgesics, anticholin­ergics, neurally active drugs, cation-containing agents, and diuretics.
Refer toAlgorithm inFig. 35.1
Diagnosis
A. History
When obtaining the history from a constipated patient, it is important to dene the nature and the duration of constipation. Some of the most common complaints in constipated patients include abdominal bloating, pain with defeca­tion, rectal bleeding, overow diarrhea or incontinence, and lower back pain. Patients that have difculty with rectal evacuation may complain of a sense of incomplete evacuation, manual extraction of stool, tenesmus, and enema retention. Other important aspects of the history should be explored, such as the patient’s normal pattern of defecation, onset and duration of abnormal pattern, perceived hardness of stools, straining to defecate, and the amount of time spent during defecation. Obtaining a validated constipation score is useful both to help direct therapy and to moni­tor post therapeutic outcomes. The Cleveland Clinic Florida-Fecal Incontinence Score (CCF-FIS) is the most widely employed score.
Table 35.1 Etiology of constipation
Primary causes of constipation Normal transit constipation Slow transit constipation Defecatory dysfunction Dyssynergia Megacolon/megarectum
Secondary causes of constipation Neurologic disorders Medications Peripheral disorders Analgesics Autonomic
neuropathy Hirschsprung disease Anticholinergics Chagas disease Antihistamines Intestinal
pseudoobstruction Sacral nerve
damage Central disorders Antipsychotics Multiple sclerosis Cation-containing
Spinal cord injury Iron supplements Parkinson disease Aluminum
Endocrine disorders Barium Diabetes mellitus Neurally-active drugs Hypothyroidism Opiates Hyperparathyroidism Antihypertensives Panhypopituitarism Ganglionic blockers Metabolic disorders Vinca alkaloids Hypokalemia Calcium channel
Hypercalcemia 5HT3 antagonists Uremia Diuretics Porphyria Myogenic disorders Myotonic dystrophy Dermatomyositis Scleroderma Amyloidosis Structural abnormalities Colorectal cancer Extraintestinal mass Postinammatory,
ischemic, or surgical
stenosis Anal ssure Anal stricture Rectal prolapse Rectocele Intussusception
NSAIDs
Antispasmodics
Antidepressants
agents
(antacids, sucralfate)
blockers