Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_837_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Second Edition Clinical Decision Making
- •Acknowledgments
- •Contents
- •Editors and Contributors
- •Editors
- •Contributors
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 1.1
- •Conclusion
- •Suggested Reading
- •1: Anorectal Examination
- •Suggested Reading
- •3: Physiologic Testing
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 3.3
- •Suggested Reading
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 4.1
- •Single Center Studies
- •Special Considerations
- •Low Rectal or Coloanal Anastomosis
- •Multi-center Studies
- •Suggested Reading
- •Summary
- •Suggested Reading
- •Introduction
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 6.1
- •Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery
- •Intraoperative Fluid Administration
- •Analgesia
- •Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis
- •Surgical Site Infection Prevention
- •Postoperative Analgesia
- •Intravenous Fluid Management
- •Early Oral Feeding
- •Early Ambulation
- •Conclusion
- •Suggested Reading
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 7.1
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 7.2
- •Melena Caused by Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
- •Hematochezia Caused by Anorectal Bleeding
- •Severe Hematochezia Causing Hemodynamic Instability
- •Suggested Reading
- •Suggested Reading
- •Suggested Reading
- •10: Anal Conditions: Anal Fissure/Recurrent Anal Fissure
- •Suggested Reading
- •Suggested Reading
- •12: Anorectal Abscess
- •Suggested Reading
- •13: Anal Conditions: Fistula-in-Ano
- •Suggested Reading
- •14: Anal Conditions: Rectovaginal Fistula
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 14.1
- •Background
- •Etiology
- •Evaluation
- •Treatment
- •Ileoanal Pouch-Vaginal Fistulas
- •Vaginal Approaches
- •Conclusion
- •Suggested Reading
- •15: Anal Conditions: Anorectal Crohn’s Disease—Fistula
- •Introduction
- •Conclusion
- •Suggested Reading
- •Suggested Reading
- •Suggested Reading
- •18: Anal Conditions: External Hemorrhoids
- •Introduction
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 18.4
- •Suggested Reading
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 19.1
- •D. Hair Removal
- •Suggested Reading
- •20: Anal Conditions: Pruritus Ani
- •Suggested Reading
- •21: Anal Conditions: Hidradenitis Suppurativa
- •Suggested Reading
- •22: Anal Conditions: Anorectal Trauma
- •Suggested Reading
- •23: Anal Conditions: STDs
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 23.1
- •Anal Conditions: Sexually Transmitted Diseases
- •Suggested Reading
- •24: Anal Considerations: Fournier’s Gangrene
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 24.1
- •Suggested Reading
- •25: Non-healing Perineal Wounds
- •Suggested Reading
- •26: Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasms
- •Diagnoses
- •Suggested Reading
- •27: Anal Conditions: Anal Margin Tumors
- •Suggested Reading
- •28: Invasive Anal Canal Neoplasia
- •Suggested Reading
- •29: Pelvic Floor Conditions: Rectal Prolapse/Recurrence
- •Suggested Reading
- •30: Pelvic Floor Conditions: Rectal Intussusception
- •Suggested Reading
- •31: Pelvic Outlet Obstruction
- •Suggested Reading
- •32: Pelvic Floor Conditions: Biofeedback
- •Background
- •Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
- •Biofeedback Therapy
- •Suggested Reading
- •33: Pelvic Floor Conditions: Fecal Incontinence
- •Fiber Supplementation
- •Medications
- •Biofeedback
- •End-to-End Sphincteroplasty
- •Tibial Nerve Stimulation
- •Graciloplasty
- •Gluteoplasty
- •∗Other Therapies
- •Injectables
- •RF Remodeling
- •Conclusion
- •Suggested Reading
- •34: Pelvic Floor Conditions: Diarrhea
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 34.1
- •Suggested Reading
- •35: Chronic Constipation
- •Introduction
- •Diagnosis
- •Management
- •Suggested Reading
- •36: Retrorectal Tumors
- •Evaluation
- •Risk Assessment
- •Pathology: Four Tissue Types
- •Treatment
- •Suggested Reading
- •37: Rectal Cancer: Local Therapy
- •Suggested Reading
- •38: Rectal Conditions: Rectal Cancer—Proctectomy
- •Suggested Reading
- •39: Rectal Conditions: Rectal Cancer—Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 39.1
- •Suggested Reading
- •40: Rectal Conditions: Stage IV Rectal Cancer
- •Introduction
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 40.1
- •Suggested Reading
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 41.1
- •Suggested Reading
- •42: Rectal Conditions: Rectal Cancer—Postoperative Surveillance
- •Suggested Reading
- •43: Recurrent Rectal Cancer
- •Introduction
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 43.2
- •A–C.
- •Carbon-Ion Radiation (CIRT)
- •Conclusion
- •Suggested Reading
- •44: Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
- •Suggested Reading
- •45: Colonic: Diverticulitis
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 45.1
- •Suggested Reading
- •46: Colonic Conditions: Large Bowel Obstruction
- •Suggested Reading
- •47: Colonic Conditions: Volvulus
- •Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 47.1
- •Introduction
- •Suggested Reading
- •48: Colonic Stricture
- •Suggested Reading
- •49: Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (ACPO): Ogilvie’s Syndrome
- •Suggested Reading
- •50: Colonic Conditions: Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
- •Introduction
- •Suggested Reading
- •51: Colorectal Trauma
- •Suggested Reading
- •52: Endometriosis
- •Suggested Reading
- •53: Colonic Conditions: Ulcerative Colitis
- •Conclusions
- •Suggested Reading
- •54: Colonic Conditions: Indeterminate Colitis
- •Suggested Reading
- •55: Colonic Conditions: Toxic Colitis
- •Medical Management
- •Risk Assessment
- •Surgical Management
- •Suggested Reading
- •56: Crohn’s Colitis
- •Suggested Reading
- •57: Ischemic Colitis
- •Suggested Reading
- •58: Colonic Conditions: Infectious Colitis
- •Suggested Reading
- •59: Colonic Conditions: Benign Colonic Neoplasia
- •Suggested Reading
- •60: Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
- •Suggested Reading
- •61: Colonic Conditions: Lynch Syndrome
- •Suspected Lynch Syndrome
- •Lynch Syndrome Diagnosis Without Clinical Symptoms or Phenotype
- •Suggested Reading
- •62: Malignant Colon Polyps
- •Suggested Reading
- •63: Colonic Conditions: Adenomatous Polyps
- •Suggested Reading
- •64: Colon Cancer Surgical Therapy
- •Suggested Reading
- •65: Colonic Conditions: Locally Advanced Colon Cancer
- •Conclusion
- •Suggested Reading
- •66: Recurrent Colon Cancer
- •Suggested Reading
- •67: Appendiceal Neoplasms

106
1
2
1
2
FISTULOTOMY FISTULECTOMY
S. Lachance and M. Boutros
Line of
incision
Fig. 13.7 Fistulotomy versus stulectomy (Source: Gordon
PH, Nivatvongs S.Principles and Practice of Surgery for the
Colon, Rectum and Anus, 3rd Edition. Informa Health Care,
operations. Therefore, to avoid the risk of
incontinence, sphincter-sparing options are
usually favored (Table 13.1). A draining
seton positioned in the stula tract is the
rst step in the treatment of complex stulas
(Fig.13.8). This promotes preservation of the
anal sphincter complex, maturation of the stula tract, and control of the septic focus. The
Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula Tract
(LIFT) procedure is an attractive option for
high transsphincteric stulas, and consists
of identifying, ligating, and dividing the stula tract within the intersphincteric groove
(See Fig.15.6). Primary healing rates range
from 71 to 82%. However, the LIFT procedure can prove to be technically difcult to
perform for very high transsphincteric stulas, and is not applicable for suprasphincteric
and extrasphincteric stulas. Fibrin glue and
anal stula plugs are two options that consist
of lling the tract with biological material.
Although these techniques may play a role in
the management of complex stulas, the high
failure rate (up to 80%) and higher cost ren-
New York 2007;pp.:222. Used with permission from the
editors)
der these options less attractive. Endorectal
advancement aps (Fig.13.9) can yield success rates up to 70% in experienced hands.
Wide-based aps with mucosal tissue provide
coverage of the internal opening, allowing the
tract to heal and close. In order to enhance
healing, mucosal aps have recently been
combined with Video-Assisted Ablation of
the Fistula Tract (VAAFT) or the Fistula
Laser Closing (FiLAC™) device. VAAFT
allows for tract cauterization under direct
visualization, while FiLAC™ relies on radialemitting disposable laser bers to ablate the
tract. However, success rates reported with
these added procedures do not exceed those
of aps alone.
K. Recurrence is common, especially with
sphincter-sparing approaches, and can manifest as persistent drainage, abscess, or
inammation at the external stula opening.
Factors that have been associated with recurrence include complex stulas, horseshoe
extensions, previous stula surgery,
sphincter- sparing approaches, lack of identi-

13 Anal Conditions: Fistula-in-Ano
Fig. 13.8 Insertion of a seton (Source: Wexner SD,
Fleshman JW, eds. Master Techniques in General Surgery.
Colon and Rectal Surgery: Anorectal Operations. Wolters
Kluwer, Philadelphia 2012;pp.:66. Used with permission)
107
cation of the internal opening, and surgeon
experience. One should be mindful that
recurrence might herald another etiology,
such as Crohn’s disease, thereby stressing
the importance of repeating a patient’s evaluation. Recurrent stulas should be treated
as complex stulas. Caution must be exercised, for every additional surgery carries
added risk of failure and continence
impairment.
L. Anorectal stulas develop in 20–30% of
patients with Crohn’s disease, thus clinicians
must consider this etiology in their differential diagnosis. In fact, stula-in-ano can be
the primary manifestation of Crohn’s disease
in up to 30% of patients. Compared to cryptoglandular disease, the mainstay of treatment
is not surgical but medical. Endoscopy and
imaging are critical to delineate the extent of
disease and the presence of any inammation
in the rectum. A multidisciplinary approach
involving a gastroenterologist is strongly recommended. Draining setons are initially used
to control sepsis. In the presence of proctitis,
medical treatment with iniximab with or
without antibiotics is required. In the absence
of proctitis, stulas can be treated medically
or surgically. Overall, remission can be
achieved with medical management in 50%
of patients with Crohn’s-related stula-inano. Surgical intervention must be undertaken with great caution and after careful
preoperative counseling due to a signicant
risk of incontinence as well as multiple procedures over the patient’s lifetime. If an operative approach is chosen, sphincter-sparing
techniques are used to limit any damage to
the sphincters, as these patients may require
further interventions for other stulas in the
future. Finally, with severe disease in the setting of Crohn’s, diversion or even proctectomy may be required.

108
Mucosal Flap Cutaneous Flap
Sutured advancement flap
Line of incision
S. Lachance and M. Boutros
Internal opening closure and advancement flap mobilization
Fig. 13.9 Flaps (Source: Wexner SD, Fleshman JW, eds. Master Techniques in General Surgery. Colon and Rectal
Surgery: Anorectal Operations. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia 2012. Chap. 5. Used with permission)

13 Anal Conditions: Fistula-in-Ano
109
Suggested Reading
Amato A, Bottini C, De Nardi P, et al. Evaluation and
management of perianal abscess and anal stula: a
consensus statement developed by the Italian Society
of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR). Tech Coloproctol.
2015;19:595–606.
Giamundo P, Esercizio L, Geraci M, Tibaldi L, Valente
M. Fistula-tract laser closure (FiLaC™):long-term
results and new operative strategies. Tech Coloproctol.
2015;19(8):449–53.
Göttgens KW, Smeets RR, Stassen LP, Beets G, Breukink
SO.Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical
interventions for high cryptoglandular perianal stula.
Int J Color Dis. 2015;30(5):583–93.
Limura E, Giordano P. Modern management of anal s-
tula. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(1):12–20.
Madbouly KM, El Shazly W, Abbas KS, Hussein
AM. Ligation of intersphincteric stula tract versus
mucosal advancement ap in patients with high trans-
sphincteric stula-in-ano: a prospective randomized
trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57(10):1202–8.
Meinero P, Mori L, Gasloli G.Video-assisted anal stula
treatment: a new concept of treating anal stula. Dis
Colon Rectum. 2014;57(3):354–9.
Narang SK, Keogh K, Alam NN, Pathak S, Daniels IR,
Smart NJ. A systematic review of new treatments for
cryptoglandular stula in ano. Surgeon. 2017;15(1):30–
9. https://doi.org/10.2016/j.surge.2016.02.002.
Sirany AM, Nygaard RM, Morken JJ. The ligation of
the intersphincteric stula tract procedure for anal
stula: a mixed bag of results. Dis Colon Rectum.
2015;58(6):604–12.
Steele SR, Kumar R, Feingold DL, etal. Practice param-
eters for the management of perianal abscess and
stula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:1465–74.
van Onkelen RS, Gosselink MP, Schouten WR.Is it pos-
sible to improve the outcome of transanal advancement ap repair for high transsphincteric stulas by
additional ligation of the intersphincteric stula tract?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(2):163–6.

Anal Conditions: Rectovaginal Fistula
JenniferE.Hrabe andTracyL.Hull
14
Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 14.1
Background
Rectovaginal stulas are socially and physically
disabling, emotionally taxing, and a painful condition for patients and often are technically challenging for the treating surgeon. The term “rectovaginal
stula” is generally applied to all abnormal connections between the rectum or anus and vagina.
Fistulous connections between the upper and mid
rectum and the vagina are often related to patients
having had hysterectomy.
Surgical treatment generally includes resection
of the bowel and re-anastomosis, often with fecal
diversion. These will not be covered here. Instead,
we focus on anovaginal, anoperineal, ileal pouchvaginal, and low rectovaginal stulas, but will
use the term “rectovaginal stula” (RVF) broadly
to encompass these conditions.
J. E. Hrabe
Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of
Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
T. L. Hull (*)
Department ofColorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease
andSurgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic,
Cleveland, OH, USA
e-mail: Hullt@ccf.org
Etiology
The most common cause of RVF is obstetric
injury, either from prolonged labor with associated
ischemia of the rectovaginal septum and subsequent tissue necrosis, or from traumatic injury
including episiotomy or perineal lacerations.
Crohn’s disease (CD) is the second most common
etiology of RVF, and up to 10% of females will
suffer this complication. Ulcerative colitis is rarely
associated with RVF. Other common causes of
RVF are cryptoglandular disease, malignancy,
complications of radiation proctitis, and iatrogenic
injury. Additional described etiologies include
infections in the setting of HIV and violent sexual
trauma. Understanding the etiology of the stula is
critical as it can inuence the choice of repair.
Evaluation
A.InOce Evaluation
Evaluating the patient begins with a careful history
gathering (Fig.14.1). Symptoms patients complain
of include foul smelling or purulent discharge per
vagina, gas or stool passed per vagina, incontinence,
pain, dyspareunia, and a history of repeated urinary
tract and vaginal infections. Bowel habits must be
ascertained. If there is frequent diarrheal stools,
medical treatments to thicken stool can decrease the
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
S. R. Steele etal. (eds.), Clinical Decision Making in Colorectal Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65942-8_14
111

112
J. E. Hrabe and T. L. Hull
Fig. 14.1 Evaluation and treatment algorithm for rectovaginal stula
incontinence. Assessing quality of life and how the
RVF affects patients is critical. In the rare instance
in which a patient has a stula but has no medical or
psychosocial adverse effects from it, it may not
make sense to undertake a repair.
The evaluation must include the patient’s past
medical history, focusing on obstetric history
(how long was the labor, did they have an episiotomy or a tear and was it repaired, were forceps
used in the delivery); signs or symptoms suggestive of Crohn’s disease; and a history or prior
malignancy, pelvic radiation, HIV infection, or
sexual trauma. As many patients have multiple
repairs attempted, it is mandatory to obtain the
operative reports of previous repairs.
The ofce physical exam should include an
evaluation of the abdomen in the case the patient
requires fecal diversion. A thorough exam of the
vaginal, perineum, and anus is essential. The vaginal stula opening may appear as a small dimple. Assess for signs of local sepsis: uctuance,
erythema, purulent drainage, tenderness to palpation. Sphincter tone should be evaluated with the
examiner feeling for muscle contraction on
squeeze. If the patient has had previous repairs,
evaluate the local tissue and scar. Stigmata of
perianal Crohn’s disease such as multiple stulous tracts, waxy skin tags (“elephant ears”), ssures and ulcerations are useful clues. In the
setting of previous radiation, evaluate the rectum
with either rigid or exible proctoscopy. In acute
radiation proctitis, the rectum will be edematous,
hyperemic, and ulcerated. The rectum in chronic
proctitis will have loss of normal vascular pattern, loss of compliance, and can have ulcerations
and strictures.

14 Anal Conditions: Rectovaginal Fistula
113
B.Imaging
A variety of imaging studies may be useful in
evaluation RVF. Radiographic imaging to consider includes an endoluminal ultrasound
(ELUS). When combined with instillation of
hydrogen peroxide via a small catheter into the
stula, ELUS informs about the complexity of
the stula by demonstrating additional tracts and
pockets of uid collection. It also demonstrates
the intactness of the anterior sphincter. The value
of vaginograms is limited to delineating high stulas, as it entails placement of a Foley catheter
into the vagina for administration of contrast and
insufation of the balloon. This therefore blocks
visualization of low rectal and anovaginal stulas. For elusive stulas, magnetic resonance
imaging can demonstrate the internal openings
on both the anorectal and vaginal sides and show
abscesses. The stula is seen on T2-weighted
images and appears as a bright, high signal intensity tract. CT scan has limited utility for local
evaluation though will demonstrate abscesses.
However, for patients in whom Crohn’s disease is
suspected, CT enterography should be considered to evaluate for more proximal disease. The
“tampon test” includes insertion of a tampon
vaginally and small enema with blue dye. The
presence of blue dye on the tampon conrms the
presence of the stula though gives no information about its tract or location of vaginal
opening.
C.Examination Under Anesthesia
Treatment
D.Initial Treatment
Treatment of the stula often requires surgical
intervention, though this should be performed only
once all other conditions have been optimized.
Fistulas resulting from obstetric injury should not
be surgically repaired for at least 3–6months. Not
only will a small fraction of these heal on their
own, but time to reduce the inammation is important for a successful denitive repair. As mentioned above, local sepsis must be controlled,
meaning that abscesses must be drained and
immature stula tracts should have a loose draining seton placed to facilitate drainage
(Figure 14.1d). Patients with Crohn’s disease
should be started on a biologic agent, as studies
have demonstrated that a proportion (nearly 50%)
of Crohn’s-related stulas will heal with medical
treatment alone (Figure14.1e). For patients with
severe perianal Crohn’s and RVF who are unlikely
to heal with even the best local repair, management may stop at medication and draining seton. If
the patients have good quality of life with this, this
limited approach is preferable to chasing aggressive surgical intervention which can disrupt fecal
continence and lead to permanent stoma. Some
women require temporary fecal diversion to help
control sepsis. The stoma may be kept in place to
facilitate healing following the denitive repair,
particularly if the repair requires a more extensive
approach such as resection and anastomosis.
Hyperbaric oxygen may be useful for brotic and
poorly vascularized tissues (Figure14.1f).
A complete physical exam is critical and if
unable to accomplish in the ofce, whether due
to patient discomfort or inability to dene the
stula tract, should prompt an examination
under anesthesia (EUA). Signs of local sepsis
should also lead to an EUA, as adequate drainage and sepsis control are the foundation of successful subsequent treatments. Placement of a
loose draining seton is commonly performed at
the EUA. Occasionally, a second EUA is needed,
either to better dene anatomy or to evaluate
resolution of sepsis.
E.Choosing theSurgical Repair
The decision of which operation to perform needs
to be tailored to the etiology of the stula, the
health of the surrounding tissue to be repaired,
the goals of the patient, and the familiarity of the
surgeon with various repairs. The repair must not
be rushed. Patients must be counseled that occasionally multiple repairs are needed to achieve
success. While surgeons often have an approach
they favor, it is critical that they have multiple

114
ab
J. E. Hrabe and T. L. Hull
approaches in their technical armamentarium.
Finally, the best chance at successful repair is at
the rst surgery.
F.Fistulotomy
Fistulotomy has limited application in RVF.The
stula must have little to no sphincter muscle
involvement, but even in that case the patient is at
risk for a keyhole deformity. This can predispose
the patient to fecal incontinence.
G.Tissue Advancement Flaps
Tissue advancement aps are frequently employed
in RVF.The rectal advancement ap (Fig.14.2),
when performed correctly and in the optimal
patient, has yielded up to 90% healing rate in certain authors’ hands. Candidates for this approach
should have a healthy rectum and anal canal.
Patients with radiation or Crohn’s proctitis and
those with ulcers or strictures are not appropriate.
Operative technique has the patient in prone jack-
knife or “Kraske” position with the buttocks taped
apart. Patients complete a mechanical bowel preparation and receive preoperative antibiotics. While
a tongue-shaped ap is often described, we believe
this tongue shape leads to ischemia and thus an
increased risk of failure. Instead, we recommend
excising with electrocautery the mucosa immediately around the stula, making a curvilinear, horizontally oriented incision at the stula for
approximately 0.5–1cm on either side, then coring out the stula. A ap consisting of rectal
mucosa, submucosa, and rectal wall is raised
cephalad to the internal opening for a distance of
0.5–1 cm. The same can be done in the caudad
direction. The stula tract is then closed in two
layers with interrupted absorbable sutures. The
rst layer reapproximates the internal sphincter
muscle and the second layer is full thickness of all
three layers: mucosa, submucosa, and muscle.
Suture with a 5/8 curved needle (e.g. UR-6
Ethicon, Cincinnati, OH or GU-46, Covidien,
Minneapolis, MN) allows deep and robust bites of
tissue. Before starting to close the second layer,
the integrity of the rst layer can be checked by
instilling saline into the vaginal opening.
Fig. 14.2 Rectal advancement ap. (a) Flap has been
dissected cephalad and caudad, internal sphincter approximated. Inset showing depth of bites for approximation.
(b) Flap mucosa is closed over stula opening, taking
mucosa, submucosa, and muscle. Closed with interrupted
absorbable sutures (Reprinted with permission, Cleveland
Clinic Center for Medical Art and Photography © 2008–
2016. All rights reserved)

14 Anal Conditions: Rectovaginal Fistula
115
For patients with an anterior sphincter defect,
some authors dissuade the use of rectal advancement aps. Others describe pairing a transrectal
advancement ap with a transperineal overlapping sphincteroplasty. Whether the sphincteroplasty is performed, the vaginal or perineal
external stula orice is left open to drain.
Postoperatively, maintaining patients on bed rest
and nil per os for a day or two following the procedure has been described to keep the anal muscles free from stimulation, though this is far from
uniform practice. For patients whose stulas
recur, rectal advancement aps can be repeated,
though the healing rate has been shown to drop
by one third for the second repair versus the rst.
H.Episioproctotomy
An alternative approach for women with anterior
sphincter defects with an RVF is the episioproctotomy, Fig.14.3. While this approach is less widespread within colorectal surgery, it offers healing
rates at least equivalent to that of advancement aps
and has been described for a range of RVF etiologies. As with the advancement ap, patients undergo
bowel preparation and preoperative antibiotics and
are placed prone. A probe is placed through the stula and a stulotomy is performed. The muscle
ends are identied laterally and mobilized. The rectal mucosa is closed, then an overlapping sphincteroplasty is completed. The vaginal mucosa and
then perineal skin is then closed.
I.Anoplasty
with severe perianal Crohn’s disease or who have
scar tissue from previous repairs.
J.Rectal Sleeve Advancement Flap
For patients with extensive anal canal ulcerations or
stricturing but with healthy, well vascularized, and
distensible rectal tissue, the rectal sleeve advancement ap can be considered, Fig.14.4. The approach
offers an alternative to proctectomy or permanent
diversion, such as for patients with severe, disabling
perianal Crohn’s disease. Preoperative preparation
and positioning is the same as previously mentioned. A circumferential incision is made distal to
the stula opening, at or just distal to the dentate
line. The incision is carried through mucosa, submucosa, and just a scant few bers of the internal
sphincter. A sleeve ap is raised in a cephalad direction with the dissection in the supralevator space.
Mobilization continues until the rectal sleeve can be
advanced without tension to the point of planned
anastomosis. Prior to the anastomosis, the stula
tract is debrided and closed on the rectal side, while
the vaginal opening is left open to drain. Attention is
turned back to the sleeve, where the rim of unhealthy
tissue is sharply excised, and then the anastomosis
from rectum to anoderm is completed using interrupted absorbable sutures. Both the patient and the
surgeon must be prepared for an abdominal incision
and intra-abdominal colonic mobilization or even
proctectomy with diversion, if a tension-free anastomosis cannot be created. As this is functionally a
coloanal anastomosis, we almost always divert
patients undergoing rectal sleeve advancement
aps.
Anocutaneous aps (anoplasty) are less often
described for RVF, but do play a role in low stulas
where it may not be feasible to mobilize an advancement ap to reach the stula opening. The tissue
surrounding the stula opening is debrided, the stula is cored out and closed with interrupted sutures.
A number of ap congurations are available for
anal stenosis, but generally an island of skin and
fatty subcutaneous tissue is mobilized from the anal
verge/margin and then advanced proximally to
cover the stula. This repair requires healthy, pliable anal tissue and is not a good option in patients
Ileoanal Pouch-Vaginal Fistulas
Special mention is made of ileoanal pouchvaginal stulas. These can be repaired with
modications of aforementioned procedures
including ileal advancement ap, or transanal
mucosectomy and pouch-anal sutured anastomosis. As with any stula, control of sepsis is
an essential rst step and we nearly always
employ fecal diversion. For stulas at or distal
to the anastomosis, mucosectomy and full

116
ab
cd
J. E. Hrabe and T. L. Hull
Fig. 14.3 Episioproctotomy. (a, b) A complete stulot-
omy is performed. The stula tract is debrided. (a)
Muscles are identied laterally and mobilized. (b) The
rectal mucosa is closed. (e–g) An overlapping repair of
sphincter muscles is followed by closure of vaginal
mucosa and perineal skin with interrupted absorbable
sutures (Reprinted with permission, Cleveland Clinic
Center for Medical Art and Photography © 2008–2016.
All rights reserved)
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
