Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_837_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
38 Мб
Скачать
106
1
2
1
2
FISTULOTOMY FISTULECTOMY
S. Lachance and M. Boutros
Line of incision
Fig. 13.7 Fistulotomy versus stulectomy (Source: Gordon PH, Nivatvongs S.Principles and Practice of Surgery for the Colon, Rectum and Anus, 3rd Edition. Informa Health Care,
operations. Therefore, to avoid the risk of incontinence, sphincter-sparing options are usually favored (Table 13.1). A draining seton positioned in the stula tract is the rst step in the treatment of complex stulas (Fig.13.8). This promotes preservation of the anal sphincter complex, maturation of the s­tula tract, and control of the septic focus. The Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) procedure is an attractive option for high transsphincteric stulas, and consists of identifying, ligating, and dividing the s­tula tract within the intersphincteric groove (See Fig.15.6). Primary healing rates range from 71 to 82%. However, the LIFT proce­dure can prove to be technically difcult to perform for very high transsphincteric stu­las, and is not applicable for suprasphincteric and extrasphincteric stulas. Fibrin glue and anal stula plugs are two options that consist of lling the tract with biological material. Although these techniques may play a role in the management of complex stulas, the high failure rate (up to 80%) and higher cost ren-
New York 2007;pp.:222. Used with permission from the editors)
der these options less attractive. Endorectal advancement aps (Fig.13.9) can yield suc­cess rates up to 70% in experienced hands. Wide-based aps with mucosal tissue provide coverage of the internal opening, allowing the tract to heal and close. In order to enhance healing, mucosal aps have recently been combined with Video-Assisted Ablation of the Fistula Tract (VAAFT) or the Fistula Laser Closing (FiLAC™) device. VAAFT allows for tract cauterization under direct visualization, while FiLAC™ relies on radial­emitting disposable laser bers to ablate the tract. However, success rates reported with these added procedures do not exceed those of aps alone.
K. Recurrence is common, especially with
sphincter-sparing approaches, and can mani­fest as persistent drainage, abscess, or inammation at the external stula opening. Factors that have been associated with recur­rence include complex stulas, horseshoe extensions, previous stula surgery, sphincter- sparing approaches, lack of identi-
13 Anal Conditions: Fistula-in-Ano
Fig. 13.8 Insertion of a seton (Source: Wexner SD, Fleshman JW, eds. Master Techniques in General Surgery. Colon and Rectal Surgery: Anorectal Operations. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia 2012;pp.:66. Used with permission)
107
cation of the internal opening, and surgeon experience. One should be mindful that recurrence might herald another etiology, such as Crohn’s disease, thereby stressing the importance of repeating a patient’s eval­uation. Recurrent stulas should be treated as complex stulas. Caution must be exer­cised, for every additional surgery carries added risk of failure and continence impairment.
L. Anorectal stulas develop in 20–30% of
patients with Crohn’s disease, thus clinicians must consider this etiology in their differen­tial diagnosis. In fact, stula-in-ano can be the primary manifestation of Crohn’s disease in up to 30% of patients. Compared to crypto­glandular disease, the mainstay of treatment is not surgical but medical. Endoscopy and imaging are critical to delineate the extent of disease and the presence of any inammation in the rectum. A multidisciplinary approach involving a gastroenterologist is strongly rec­ommended. Draining setons are initially used to control sepsis. In the presence of proctitis, medical treatment with iniximab with or without antibiotics is required. In the absence of proctitis, stulas can be treated medically or surgically. Overall, remission can be achieved with medical management in 50% of patients with Crohn’s-related stula-in­ano. Surgical intervention must be under­taken with great caution and after careful preoperative counseling due to a signicant risk of incontinence as well as multiple pro­cedures over the patient’s lifetime. If an oper­ative approach is chosen, sphincter-sparing techniques are used to limit any damage to the sphincters, as these patients may require further interventions for other stulas in the future. Finally, with severe disease in the set­ting of Crohn’s, diversion or even proctec­tomy may be required.
108
Mucosal Flap Cutaneous Flap
Sutured advancement flap
Line of incision
S. Lachance and M. Boutros
Internal opening closure and advancement flap mobilization
Fig. 13.9 Flaps (Source: Wexner SD, Fleshman JW, eds. Master Techniques in General Surgery. Colon and Rectal Surgery: Anorectal Operations. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia 2012. Chap. 5. Used with permission)
13 Anal Conditions: Fistula-in-Ano
109

Suggested Reading

Amato A, Bottini C, De Nardi P, et al. Evaluation and
management of perianal abscess and anal stula: a consensus statement developed by the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR). Tech Coloproctol. 2015;19:595–606.
Giamundo P, Esercizio L, Geraci M, Tibaldi L, Valente
M. Fistula-tract laser closure (FiLaC™):long-term results and new operative strategies. Tech Coloproctol. 2015;19(8):449–53.
Göttgens KW, Smeets RR, Stassen LP, Beets G, Breukink
SO.Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical interventions for high cryptoglandular perianal stula. Int J Color Dis. 2015;30(5):583–93.
Limura E, Giordano P. Modern management of anal s-
tula. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(1):12–20.
Madbouly KM, El Shazly W, Abbas KS, Hussein
AM. Ligation of intersphincteric stula tract versus mucosal advancement ap in patients with high trans-
sphincteric stula-in-ano: a prospective randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57(10):1202–8.
Meinero P, Mori L, Gasloli G.Video-assisted anal stula
treatment: a new concept of treating anal stula. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57(3):354–9.
Narang SK, Keogh K, Alam NN, Pathak S, Daniels IR,
Smart NJ. A systematic review of new treatments for cryptoglandular stula in ano. Surgeon. 2017;15(1):30–
9. https://doi.org/10.2016/j.surge.2016.02.002.
Sirany AM, Nygaard RM, Morken JJ. The ligation of
the intersphincteric stula tract procedure for anal stula: a mixed bag of results. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58(6):604–12.
Steele SR, Kumar R, Feingold DL, etal. Practice param-
eters for the management of perianal abscess and stula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:1465–74.
van Onkelen RS, Gosselink MP, Schouten WR.Is it pos-
sible to improve the outcome of transanal advance­ment ap repair for high transsphincteric stulas by additional ligation of the intersphincteric stula tract? Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(2):163–6.

Anal Conditions: Rectovaginal Fistula

JenniferE.Hrabe andTracyL.Hull
14

Refer to Algorithm in Fig. 14.1

Background
Rectovaginal stulas are socially and physically disabling, emotionally taxing, and a painful condi­tion for patients and often are technically challeng­ing for the treating surgeon. The term “rectovaginal stula” is generally applied to all abnormal con­nections between the rectum or anus and vagina. Fistulous connections between the upper and mid rectum and the vagina are often related to patients having had hysterectomy. Surgical treatment generally includes resection of the bowel and re-anastomosis, often with fecal diversion. These will not be covered here. Instead, we focus on anovaginal, anoperineal, ileal pouch­vaginal, and low rectovaginal stulas, but will use the term “rectovaginal stula” (RVF) broadly to encompass these conditions.
J. E. Hrabe Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
T. L. Hull (*) Department ofColorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease andSurgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA e-mail: Hullt@ccf.org

Etiology

The most common cause of RVF is obstetric injury, either from prolonged labor with associated ischemia of the rectovaginal septum and subse­quent tissue necrosis, or from traumatic injury including episiotomy or perineal lacerations. Crohn’s disease (CD) is the second most common etiology of RVF, and up to 10% of females will suffer this complication. Ulcerative colitis is rarely associated with RVF. Other common causes of RVF are cryptoglandular disease, malignancy, complications of radiation proctitis, and iatrogenic injury. Additional described etiologies include infections in the setting of HIV and violent sexual trauma. Understanding the etiology of the stula is critical as it can inuence the choice of repair.

Evaluation

A.InOce Evaluation
Evaluating the patient begins with a careful history gathering (Fig.14.1). Symptoms patients complain of include foul smelling or purulent discharge per vagina, gas or stool passed per vagina, incontinence, pain, dyspareunia, and a history of repeated urinary tract and vaginal infections. Bowel habits must be ascertained. If there is frequent diarrheal stools, medical treatments to thicken stool can decrease the
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 S. R. Steele etal. (eds.), Clinical Decision Making in Colorectal Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65942-8_14
111
112
J. E. Hrabe and T. L. Hull
Fig. 14.1 Evaluation and treatment algorithm for rectovaginal stula
incontinence. Assessing quality of life and how the RVF affects patients is critical. In the rare instance in which a patient has a stula but has no medical or psychosocial adverse effects from it, it may not make sense to undertake a repair.
The evaluation must include the patient’s past medical history, focusing on obstetric history (how long was the labor, did they have an episi­otomy or a tear and was it repaired, were forceps used in the delivery); signs or symptoms sugges­tive of Crohn’s disease; and a history or prior malignancy, pelvic radiation, HIV infection, or sexual trauma. As many patients have multiple repairs attempted, it is mandatory to obtain the operative reports of previous repairs.
The ofce physical exam should include an evaluation of the abdomen in the case the patient requires fecal diversion. A thorough exam of the
vaginal, perineum, and anus is essential. The vag­inal stula opening may appear as a small dim­ple. Assess for signs of local sepsis: uctuance, erythema, purulent drainage, tenderness to palpa­tion. Sphincter tone should be evaluated with the examiner feeling for muscle contraction on squeeze. If the patient has had previous repairs, evaluate the local tissue and scar. Stigmata of perianal Crohn’s disease such as multiple stu­lous tracts, waxy skin tags (“elephant ears”), s­sures and ulcerations are useful clues. In the setting of previous radiation, evaluate the rectum with either rigid or exible proctoscopy. In acute radiation proctitis, the rectum will be edematous, hyperemic, and ulcerated. The rectum in chronic proctitis will have loss of normal vascular pat­tern, loss of compliance, and can have ulcerations and strictures.
14 Anal Conditions: Rectovaginal Fistula
113
B.Imaging
A variety of imaging studies may be useful in evaluation RVF. Radiographic imaging to con­sider includes an endoluminal ultrasound (ELUS). When combined with instillation of hydrogen peroxide via a small catheter into the stula, ELUS informs about the complexity of the stula by demonstrating additional tracts and pockets of uid collection. It also demonstrates the intactness of the anterior sphincter. The value of vaginograms is limited to delineating high s­tulas, as it entails placement of a Foley catheter into the vagina for administration of contrast and insufation of the balloon. This therefore blocks visualization of low rectal and anovaginal stu­las. For elusive stulas, magnetic resonance imaging can demonstrate the internal openings on both the anorectal and vaginal sides and show abscesses. The stula is seen on T2-weighted images and appears as a bright, high signal inten­sity tract. CT scan has limited utility for local evaluation though will demonstrate abscesses. However, for patients in whom Crohn’s disease is suspected, CT enterography should be consid­ered to evaluate for more proximal disease. The “tampon test” includes insertion of a tampon vaginally and small enema with blue dye. The presence of blue dye on the tampon conrms the presence of the stula though gives no informa­tion about its tract or location of vaginal opening.
C.Examination Under Anesthesia

Treatment

D.Initial Treatment
Treatment of the stula often requires surgical intervention, though this should be performed only once all other conditions have been optimized. Fistulas resulting from obstetric injury should not be surgically repaired for at least 3–6months. Not only will a small fraction of these heal on their own, but time to reduce the inammation is impor­tant for a successful denitive repair. As men­tioned above, local sepsis must be controlled, meaning that abscesses must be drained and immature stula tracts should have a loose drain­ing seton placed to facilitate drainage (Figure 14.1d). Patients with Crohn’s disease should be started on a biologic agent, as studies have demonstrated that a proportion (nearly 50%) of Crohn’s-related stulas will heal with medical treatment alone (Figure14.1e). For patients with severe perianal Crohn’s and RVF who are unlikely to heal with even the best local repair, manage­ment may stop at medication and draining seton. If the patients have good quality of life with this, this limited approach is preferable to chasing aggres­sive surgical intervention which can disrupt fecal continence and lead to permanent stoma. Some women require temporary fecal diversion to help control sepsis. The stoma may be kept in place to facilitate healing following the denitive repair, particularly if the repair requires a more extensive approach such as resection and anastomosis. Hyperbaric oxygen may be useful for brotic and poorly vascularized tissues (Figure14.1f).
A complete physical exam is critical and if unable to accomplish in the ofce, whether due to patient discomfort or inability to dene the stula tract, should prompt an examination under anesthesia (EUA). Signs of local sepsis should also lead to an EUA, as adequate drain­age and sepsis control are the foundation of suc­cessful subsequent treatments. Placement of a loose draining seton is commonly performed at the EUA. Occasionally, a second EUA is needed, either to better dene anatomy or to evaluate resolution of sepsis.
E.Choosing theSurgical Repair
The decision of which operation to perform needs to be tailored to the etiology of the stula, the health of the surrounding tissue to be repaired, the goals of the patient, and the familiarity of the surgeon with various repairs. The repair must not be rushed. Patients must be counseled that occa­sionally multiple repairs are needed to achieve success. While surgeons often have an approach they favor, it is critical that they have multiple
114
ab
J. E. Hrabe and T. L. Hull
approaches in their technical armamentarium. Finally, the best chance at successful repair is at the rst surgery.
F.Fistulotomy
Fistulotomy has limited application in RVF.The stula must have little to no sphincter muscle involvement, but even in that case the patient is at risk for a keyhole deformity. This can predispose the patient to fecal incontinence.
G.Tissue Advancement Flaps
Tissue advancement aps are frequently employed in RVF.The rectal advancement ap (Fig.14.2), when performed correctly and in the optimal patient, has yielded up to 90% healing rate in cer­tain authors’ hands. Candidates for this approach should have a healthy rectum and anal canal. Patients with radiation or Crohn’s proctitis and those with ulcers or strictures are not appropriate. Operative technique has the patient in prone jack-
knife or “Kraske” position with the buttocks taped apart. Patients complete a mechanical bowel prep­aration and receive preoperative antibiotics. While a tongue-shaped ap is often described, we believe this tongue shape leads to ischemia and thus an increased risk of failure. Instead, we recommend excising with electrocautery the mucosa immedi­ately around the stula, making a curvilinear, hori­zontally oriented incision at the stula for approximately 0.5–1cm on either side, then cor­ing out the stula. A ap consisting of rectal mucosa, submucosa, and rectal wall is raised cephalad to the internal opening for a distance of
0.5–1 cm. The same can be done in the caudad direction. The stula tract is then closed in two layers with interrupted absorbable sutures. The rst layer reapproximates the internal sphincter muscle and the second layer is full thickness of all three layers: mucosa, submucosa, and muscle. Suture with a 5/8 curved needle (e.g. UR-6 Ethicon, Cincinnati, OH or GU-46, Covidien, Minneapolis, MN) allows deep and robust bites of tissue. Before starting to close the second layer, the integrity of the rst layer can be checked by instilling saline into the vaginal opening.
Fig. 14.2 Rectal advancement ap. (a) Flap has been dissected cephalad and caudad, internal sphincter approx­imated. Inset showing depth of bites for approximation. (b) Flap mucosa is closed over stula opening, taking
mucosa, submucosa, and muscle. Closed with interrupted absorbable sutures (Reprinted with permission, Cleveland
Clinic Center for Medical Art and Photography © 2008–
2016. All rights reserved)
14 Anal Conditions: Rectovaginal Fistula
115
For patients with an anterior sphincter defect, some authors dissuade the use of rectal advance­ment aps. Others describe pairing a transrectal advancement ap with a transperineal overlap­ping sphincteroplasty. Whether the sphinctero­plasty is performed, the vaginal or perineal external stula orice is left open to drain. Postoperatively, maintaining patients on bed rest and nil per os for a day or two following the pro­cedure has been described to keep the anal mus­cles free from stimulation, though this is far from uniform practice. For patients whose stulas recur, rectal advancement aps can be repeated, though the healing rate has been shown to drop by one third for the second repair versus the rst.
H.Episioproctotomy
An alternative approach for women with anterior sphincter defects with an RVF is the episioproctot­omy, Fig.14.3. While this approach is less wide­spread within colorectal surgery, it offers healing rates at least equivalent to that of advancement aps and has been described for a range of RVF etiolo­gies. As with the advancement ap, patients undergo bowel preparation and preoperative antibiotics and are placed prone. A probe is placed through the s­tula and a stulotomy is performed. The muscle ends are identied laterally and mobilized. The rec­tal mucosa is closed, then an overlapping sphinc­teroplasty is completed. The vaginal mucosa and then perineal skin is then closed.
I.Anoplasty
with severe perianal Crohn’s disease or who have scar tissue from previous repairs.
J.Rectal Sleeve Advancement Flap
For patients with extensive anal canal ulcerations or stricturing but with healthy, well vascularized, and distensible rectal tissue, the rectal sleeve advance­ment ap can be considered, Fig.14.4. The approach offers an alternative to proctectomy or permanent diversion, such as for patients with severe, disabling perianal Crohn’s disease. Preoperative preparation and positioning is the same as previously men­tioned. A circumferential incision is made distal to the stula opening, at or just distal to the dentate line. The incision is carried through mucosa, sub­mucosa, and just a scant few bers of the internal sphincter. A sleeve ap is raised in a cephalad direc­tion with the dissection in the supralevator space. Mobilization continues until the rectal sleeve can be advanced without tension to the point of planned anastomosis. Prior to the anastomosis, the stula tract is debrided and closed on the rectal side, while the vaginal opening is left open to drain. Attention is turned back to the sleeve, where the rim of unhealthy tissue is sharply excised, and then the anastomosis from rectum to anoderm is completed using inter­rupted absorbable sutures. Both the patient and the surgeon must be prepared for an abdominal incision and intra-abdominal colonic mobilization or even proctectomy with diversion, if a tension-free anas­tomosis cannot be created. As this is functionally a coloanal anastomosis, we almost always divert patients undergoing rectal sleeve advancement aps.
Anocutaneous aps (anoplasty) are less often described for RVF, but do play a role in low stulas where it may not be feasible to mobilize an advance­ment ap to reach the stula opening. The tissue surrounding the stula opening is debrided, the s­tula is cored out and closed with interrupted sutures. A number of ap congurations are available for anal stenosis, but generally an island of skin and fatty subcutaneous tissue is mobilized from the anal verge/margin and then advanced proximally to cover the stula. This repair requires healthy, pli­able anal tissue and is not a good option in patients

Ileoanal Pouch-Vaginal Fistulas

Special mention is made of ileoanal pouch­vaginal stulas. These can be repaired with modications of aforementioned procedures including ileal advancement ap, or transanal mucosectomy and pouch-anal sutured anasto­mosis. As with any stula, control of sepsis is an essential rst step and we nearly always employ fecal diversion. For stulas at or distal to the anastomosis, mucosectomy and full
116
ab
cd
J. E. Hrabe and T. L. Hull
Fig. 14.3 Episioproctotomy. (a, b) A complete stulot- omy is performed. The stula tract is debrided. (a) Muscles are identied laterally and mobilized. (b) The rectal mucosa is closed. (e–g) An overlapping repair of sphincter muscles is followed by closure of vaginal
mucosa and perineal skin with interrupted absorbable sutures (Reprinted with permission, Cleveland Clinic
Center for Medical Art and Photography © 2008–2016. All rights reserved)