Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3657_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
49 Мб
Скачать
468
K. Sterner and A. Krishnaraj
Fig. 42.6 Loculated pleural effusions. (a) Conventional radiograph of
the chest demonstrates bilateral oval opacities, which are consistent with loculated pleural uid along the ssure as seen in CECT axial sec­tion through the level of the heart (arrows, b). Dotted arrows in (b) also

Conventional Therapy

Ascites
Medical therapy is the initial therapeutic strategy in most vol­ume overload states [18]. The rst-line treatment in alcohol­related cirrhosis is cessation of alcohol [18]. In both heart failure and cirrhosis, sodium restriction and diuretics are used [12, 18]. Volume is removed via dialysis in renal failure. Management of
demonstrate trace-dependent simple pleural effusions. (c) Different patient, CECT axial section through the chest illustrates a loculated pleural effusion with lenticular shape (arrow)
malignant ascites initially involves chemotherapy and/or surgi­cal debulking of the tumor depending on the type of cancer.
Key Point
Refractory ascites is dened as uid overload that is
unresponsive to medical management. TIPS may be
indicated in this patient population (refer to Chap. 38)
[12, 18].
42 Ascites andPleural Eusion
469
Fig. 42.7 Parapneumonic effusion. (a) Conventional radiograph dem-
onstrating left pleural effusion obscuring the left heart border (arrow) as well as left upper and lower lobe consolidative opacities (circle). (b)
Fig. 42.8 (a, b) CECT axial section through the chest. There is a small empyema in the left pleural space as demonstrated by loculated pleural
uid (*) with thickened, enhancing pleura (arrows) indicating split pleura sign
Same patient, CECT axial section through the chest demonstrates a left simple pleural effusion (ROI with HU of 5) and left upper and lower lobe pneumonia (arrow)
Pleural Eusion
Medical treatment of pleural effusion is indicated when the patient is symptomatic. Treatment options are aimed at addressing the underlying disease: diuretics in CHF, dialysis in renal failure, and optimized nutrition in nephrotic syn­drome or hypoalbuminemia. Parapneumonic effusions typi­cally resolve with appropriately targeted antibiotic therapy. If a parapneumonic effusion persists or develops into an
empyema, percutaneous or surgical drainage is warranted. Malignant pleural effusions are managed with treatment of the underlying cancer. When standard chemotherapy and radiation therapy fail, treatment options are typically pallia­tive to manage the symptoms of the effusion.
Surgical options for malignant pleural effusion include
video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) pleurodesis, pleuroperitoneal shunting, or surgical pleurectomy/decorti-
470
K. Sterner and A. Krishnaraj
Fig. 42.9 Chest ultrasound (US). (a) Anechoic uid (*) is seen within
the pleural space, consistent with a simple pleural effusion. Thick arrow points to the lung. (b) Additional chest US of a different patient demon-
cation [9]. Pleurodesis is the elimination of the pleural space to prevent uid accumulation using a sclerosing agent such as talc, bleomycin, or, less commonly, doxycycline [10]. Pleurodesis often fails when the lung is unable to be fully re-expanded [10]. Thoracoscopic placement of a pleuroperi­toneal catheter is rarely performed due to high rate of cathe­ter failure, risk of infection, and tumor seeding. Pleurectomy and decortication are options for refractory malignant pleu­ral effusions; however there is a signicant morbidity and mortality rate with this procedure [10].

Interventional Therapy

Ascites
Any new-onset ascites or ascites with new fever, encepha­lopathy, decreased renal function, metabolic acidosis, and/or abdominal pain should be further investigated by paracente­sis with ascites uid analysis [12]. Additionally, serial large volume paracenteses (>5L) are performed for patients with refractory ascites due to cirrhosis or malignancy. For patients with refractory ascites, frequently palliative patients, a tun­neled paracentesis catheter can be placed in a similar fashion to a tunneled thoracentesis catheter so that they can remove ascites uid without needing to come to the hospital.
Paracentesis is a minimally invasive procedure and requires basic pre-procedure preparation. Prior to perfor­mance of the procedure, a thorough review of the patient’s history, indication for procedure, history of prior procedures,
strates a complex pleural effusion indicated by anechoic uid pockets (*) with septations (arrows)
surgeries, and medications should be conducted. Previous imaging, if available, should be reviewed to assess volume of ascites and anatomy. Pre-procedure labs including INR and platelet count should be checked to assess bleeding risk. Acceptable parameters based on consensus guidelines include an INR 2.0 and platelets ≥50,000/μL [19, 20]. It is important to review the patient’s medications and look for any medication that may increase the patient’s bleeding risk. Medications to hold include [1921]:
• High-dose aspirin used for primary prevention: Hold for 7days prior to procedure
• Clopidogrel: Only hold if out of cardiac stent safety win­dow. Hold for 5days before procedure.
• Warfarin: Hold for 5 days before procedure or reduce dose until INR is between 1.5 and 2.0. If necessary, bridge with heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH).
• Heparin: Hold for 2h before procedure.
• LMWH: Hold for 12h before procedure
Before the procedure begins, informed consent is obtained
from the patient. The only absolute contraindications to paracentesis are disseminated intravascular coagulation and brinolysis [5].
The patient is positioned supine in the procedure room.
The abdomen is examined for signs of infection, varices, sur­gical scars, or hematoma, which should be avoided when performing the procedure. Ultrasound examination is recom­mended to assess the volume of ascites and help identify an
42 Ascites andPleural Eusion
471
appropriate location for the procedure [14]. The chosen site should be devoid of bowel and blood vessels along the antici­pated tract of the access needle. Ultrasound can also be used to help guide the needle into the peritoneal cavity and ensure appropriate anesthesia along the needle tract. Typical sites of entry include the right lower quadrant, left lower quadrant, or midline, 2cm below the umbilicus. The lower quadrants are preferred in order to avoid underlying organs including the liver and spleen and abdominal varices in cirrhotic patients. When choosing a lateral approach, care should be taken to avoid the inferior epigastric arteries by inserting the needle lateral to the rectus sheath and assessing for these vessels via color Doppler ultrasound.
The How To: Paracentesis
1. Choose appropriate site of needle entry by physical exam, imaging review, and bedside ultrasound. Evaluate with color Doppler to ensure lack of vas-
42.10a).
2. As with any procedure, lidocaine is essential for patient comfort. It is important to make sure that the parietal peritoneum is anesthetized adequately to prevent procedure-associated pain
3. To help facilitate paracentesis needle entry, a No.11
dermatotomy.
4. A valved paracentesis catheter or catheter with a syringe on the back is advanced through the anesthe­tized tract with or without ultrasound guidance. The Z-track technique helps to facilitate skin closure and prevent leakage of ascites: the skin is pulled in a cau­dal direction while the needle is being advanced. A loss of resistance will be felt when the peritoneal cavity is entered and the syringe or back of the nee-
42.10b).
5. Holding the hub of the needle in place, advance the catheter over the needle followed by removal of the needle.
6. removed via wall suction into a canister, a nega­tively pressurized glass bottle, or by manual aspira­tion. Ultrasound can be used to assure complete
42.10c).
7. The catheter can then be safely removed and a sterile bandage or Dermabond applied.
After the procedure is complete, the primary operator should assess for bleeding or uid leakage. Patients should also be given instructions on when to restart medications; most medications can be restarted immediately or 12 h after the procedure.
Complications are rare if proper technique is followed [22]. Potential complications include pain, hemorrhage/ hematoma which in severe cases may require embolization of the causative vessel, infection, intra-abdominal organ injury, or persistent leakage of ascites [6]. Paracentesis­induced circulatory dysfunction (PICD) can occur after large volume paracentesis. PICD is characterized by hypo­tension, hyponatremia, and increased plasma catechol­amine and renin levels. A decrease in systemic vascular resistance and accentuation of vasodilation lead to activa­tion of the renin-angiotensin- aldosterone system, poten­tially resulting in hepatorenal syndrome and death. If 5 or more liters of uid are removed, albumin is infused (6–8g/L IV) at the end of the procedure to prevent PICD [6, 23, 24].
Key Point
Complications following paracentesis:
• Hemorrhage/hematoma
• Infection
• Intra-abdominal organ injury
• Paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction
Pleural Eusion
Drainage of pleural uid collections is performed by a vari­ety of methods and based on indication. A thoracentesis is performed if a simple drainage of uid is required or a diag­nostic sample must be obtained to further characterize a new, unexplained effusion [10, 25]. A thoracostomy tube can be placed for temporary continuous drainage, as in empyema or unresolving parapneumonic effusion [2527]. A tunneled pleural catheter is used for patients with pleural uid that reaccumulates despite drainage, e.g., malignant effusion [2527]. To accomplish this on an outpatient basis, the pleu­ral catheter is tunneled through the skin to prevent infection and allow the patient ease of access to the tube.
It is recommended that ultrasound guidance be used during a thoracentesis to prevent complications as well as increase
472
K. Sterner and A. Krishnaraj
Fig. 42.10 Ultrasound-guided paracentesis of the right lower quadrant
(RLQ). (a) Color Doppler box demonstrates no vascularity in the planned location of paracentesis. (b) The paracentesis needle (thin
success rate for small effusions [2729]. The use of continu­ous ultrasound has been shown to reduce the risk of pneumo­thorax from 10 to 30% without image guidance to 0–5% with image guidance [28, 29]. CT is an alternate imaging modality which can be used for guidance; however it is typically more costly, exposes the patient to ionizing radiation, limits patient positioning, and may have limited availability.
Thoracentesis is a minimally invasive procedure with similar pre- and post-procedure care as paracentesis. The only absolute contraindication is uncorrectable coagulopa­thy. Relative contraindications for thoracostomy tube place­ment and tunneled pleural catheter placement include the presence of a thick pleural peel, loculated collections, or a central obstructing mass, as lung re-expansion may not be achieved [25, 26].
arrows) is visualized traversing the subcutaneous tissues (block arrow), peritoneum (dotted arrows), and into the ascites. (c) Status post­paracentesis. The volume of ascites has signicantly decreased
The How To: Thorcentesis
1. Position the patient sitting upright on the edge of a bed, leaning forward with arms resting on a bedside table. Alternatively, the patient can be positioned in a lateral recumbent or supine position if the patient is unable to sit upright.
2. Ideally, access should be obtained 1–2 intercostal
spine, and above the 9th rib to avoid subdiaphrag­matic puncture. The site should be just above a rib to avoid injury of the neurovascular bundle which
42.11a, b).
(continued)
42 Ascites andPleural Eusion
473
Fig. 42.11 Thoracentesis with and without pleural tube placement. (a)
Right chest ultrasound. There is a large right pleural effusion (*) with collapsed lung (arrow). (b) Color Doppler demonstrates absent vascu­larity in the projected needle path. (c) Thoracentesis needle advanced
within the pleural space (arrow). (d) Post-procedure image demon­strates smaller pleural effusion (*) with re-expansion of the underlying lung. (e) AP chest radiograph with pigtail pleural drain in the left lower pleural space (arrow)
474
K. Sterner and A. Krishnaraj
3. dermatotomy.
4. Attach a syringe to a rigid access needle with an overlying catheter. Using ultrasound guidance, advance the needle in the same path as the lidocaine tract while holding negative pressure on the syringe.
42.11c).
5. While holding the needle still with one hand, use the other to advance the catheter over the needle and remove the needle.
6. If only a diagnostic sample is needed, attach a large syringe via a three-way stopcock and aspirate the appropriate volume. .
7. For large volume thoracentesis, attach drainage tub­ing to the stopcock and attach the other end to a one­way bag collection system or evacuation chamber.
with the syringe and push the syringe to drain into the bag or evacuation chamber. Alternatively a nega­tively pressurized glass canister can be used to pull
patient starts to experience pain or excessive cough-
ing an initial encounter due to the small risk for re-expansion pulmonary edema [30].
8. Once completed, remove the catheter during expi­ration. Cover the site with an occlusive dressing. Post-procedure imaging can be performed using
42.11d).
The How To: Tube Thoracostomy
1.
instead of a thoracentesis needle.
2. Using the Seldinger technique, insert a guidewire through the needle and remove the needle.
3. Advance the appropriate sized dilator for the pleu­ral catheter being used over the wire followed by a 12–14G pleural catheter. Remove the guidewire. Attach to a drainage unit with continuous suction at
O.
2
4. Suture the catheter to the skin and/or apply an
42.11e, f).
The How To: Tunneled Pleural Catheter
1.
guidewire is within the pleural cavity.
2. pleural access site.
3. Anesthetize the entry site and projected tract of the tunnel with 1% lidocaine.
4. the pleural catheter and blunt dissect with a Kelly clamp.
5. Advance the tunneler with catheter attached through the skin nick and through the pleural entry site while staying within the subcutaneous tissues. Remove the tunneler from the catheter.
6. Advance dilator over the guidewire followed by a peel-away sheath.
7. Remove the guidewire and quickly insert the pleural catheter through the peel-away sheath. “Crack” the peel-away sheath and remove while maintaining forward pressure on the catheter. Once the sheath is removed, the catheter should
-
be entirely under the skin. Attach the catheter to a drainage bag.
8. Suture the catheter to the skin at the skin entry site. Close the incision at the pleural entry site with a subcutaneous suture or Dermabond.
After the procedure, it is important to monitor the patient for 30min to 1 h to ensure that no complications, such as pneumothorax, have occurred. A post-procedure radiograph is typically obtained after a thoracentesis if the operator is concerned for a complication or when a tube is placed to ensure proper positioning. Pleural catheters are ushed every 8h with 5–15mL of saline and daily output is recorded [27]. When daily drainage has decreased to 100–200mL, a chest radiograph is obtained to assess for a remaining collection [28]. If the lung is appropriately re-expanded, the tube can be removed or the patient can proceed with pleurodesis for malignant effusions.
As in paracentesis, complications are uncommon [29]. The main complication is development of an iatrogenic pneumothorax [26]. A pneumothorax develops when air from the atmosphere ows into the pleural space through the open needle or via injury to the lung during the proce­dure. When attaching the catheter or inserting guidewires, make sure that the hub of the needle or catheter is covered at
42 Ascites andPleural Eusion
475
all times; this risk is mitigated with valved catheters. Additional complications include bleeding, infection, pain, intra- abdominal organ injury secondary to low access site, and tube malfunction [26]. Tube malfunction occurs when clot forms in the tube or if the tube is kinked or malposi­tioned. If the collection is loculated, the tube may not drain appropriately. Fibrinolysis with tPA can be used in this situ­ation. Rarely, re-expansion pulmonary edema can occur after large volume thoracentesis [29]. This is characterized by unilateral pulmonary edema after the lung has re-inated status post- thoracentesis although the etiology for this com­plication is poorly understood. To minimize the risk of re­expansion pulmonary edema, it is advised to remove no more than 1500 mL in a single session or no more than 500mL/hour in a continuous drainage system although this may vary by institution [29, 30].
Key Point
Complications following thoracentesis:
• Iatrogenic pneumothorax
• Bleeding
• Infection
• Intra-abdominal organ injury
• Re-expansion pulmonary edema

References

1. Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N, Aster JC.Pathologic basis of dis­ease. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2010.
2. Runyon BA.Management of adult patients with ascites due to cir­rhosis: update 2012. Hepatology. 57(4), 2013:1–26.
3. Kuiper JJ, van Buuran HR.Ascites in cirrhosis: a review of manage­ment and complications. Netherlands. JMed. 2007;65(8):283–8.
4. Pedersen JS, Bendtsen F, Moller S.Management of cirrhotic asci­tes. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2015;6(3):124–37.
5. Thomsen TW, Shaffer RW, White B, Setnik GS. Paracentesis. N Engl JMed. 2006;355(19):e21.
6. McGibbon A, Chen GI, Peltekain KM, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S.An evidence-based manual for abdominal paracentesis. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52:3307–15.
7. Froudarakis ME. Diagnostic work-up of pleural effusion. Respiration. 2008;75:4–13.
8. McGrath EE, Anderson PB.Diagnosis of pleural effusion: a sys­tematic approach. Am JCrit Care. 2011;20(2):119–27.
9. Medford A, Maskell N. Pleural effusion. Postgrad Med J.2005;81:702–10.
10. Karkhanis VS, Joshi JM.Pleural effusion: diagnosis, treatment, and management. OAEM. 2012;4:31–52.
11. Webb WR.The pleura and pleural disease. In: Webb WR, Higgins CB, editors. Thoracic imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2017. p.660–98.
12. Gore RM, Silvers RI, Newmark GM, Gore MD.Ascites and perito­neal uid collections. In: Gore RM, Levine MS, editors. Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2015. p.2024–35.
13. Thoeni RF. The role of imaging in patients with ascites. AJR. 1995;165:16–8.
14. Bard C, Lafortune M, Breton G. Ascites: ultrasound guidance or blind paracentesis. CMAJ. 1986;135:209–10.
15. Hanbidge AE, Lynch D, Wilson SR. US of the peritoneum. Radiographics. 2003;23:663–85.
16. Management YH.Of pleural effusion, empyema and lung abscess. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2011;28(1):75–86.
17. Soni NJ, Franco R, Velez MI, Schnobrich D, Dancel R, Restrepo MI, etal. Ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of pleural effusions. JHosp Med. 2015;10(12):811–6.
18. Pericleous M, Sarnowski A, Moore A, Fijten R, Zaman M.The clini­cal management of abdominal ascites, spontaneous bacterial perito­nitis and hepatorenal syndrome: a review of current guidelines and recommendations. Eur JGastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;28(3):10–8.
19. Orman ES, Hayashi PH, Bataller R, Barritt AS.Paracentesis is asso­ciated with reduced mortality in patients hospitalized with cirrhosis and ascites. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12(3):496–503.
20. Patel IJ, Davidson JC, Nikolic B, Salazar GM, Schwartzberg MS, Walker TG, etal. Consensus guidelines for periprocedural man­agement of coagulation status and hemostasis risk in percutane­ous image-guided interventions. JVasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23: 727–36.
21. O’Connor SD, Taylor AJ, Williams EC, Winter TC. Coagulation concepts update. AJR. 2009;193:1656–64.
22. Barsuk JH, Cohen ER, Feinglass J, McGaghie WC, Wayne DB.Clinical outcomes after bedside and interventional radiology paracentesis procedures. Am JMed. 2013;126(4):349–56.
23. Sola-Vera J, Minana J, Ricart E, Planella M, Gonzalex B, Torras X, etal. Randomized trial comparing albumin and saline in the pre­vention of paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction in cirrhotic patients with ascites. Hepatology. 2003;37(5):1147–53.
24. Kwok CS, Krupa L, Mahtani A, Kaye D, Rushbrook SM, Phillips MG, etal. Albumin reduces paracentesis-induced circulatory dys­function and reduces death and renal impairment among patients with cirrhosis and infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:1–8.
25. Lewandowski RJ, Desai SB, Nemcek AA. Treatment of effu­sions and abscesses. In: Mauro MA, Murphy KPJ, Thomson KR, Venbrux AC, Zollikofer CL, editors. Image-guided interventions, vol. 1. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2008. p.1615–27.
26. Hogg JR, Caccavale M, Gillen B, McKenzie G, Vlaminck J, Fleming CJ, etal. Tube thoracostomy: a review for the interven­tional radiologist. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2011;28(1):39–47.
27. Patz EF, Erasmus JJ.Catheter drainage of intrathoracic collections. In: Kandarpa K, Aruny JE, editors. Handbook of interventional radiologic procedures. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2002. p.154–62.
28. McDermott S, Levis DA, Arellano RS. Chest drainage. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2012;29(4):247–55.
29. Jones PW, Moyers P, Rogers JT, Rodriguez RM, Lee CG, Light RW.Ultrasound thoracentesis. Chest. 2003;123(2):418–23.
30. Thomsen TW, DeLaPena J, Setnnik GS. Thoracentesis. N Engl JMed. 2006;355(15):e16.

Obstructive Uropathy

LukeA.Byers andPaulJ.Rochon

Pathophysiology

Obstructive uropathy is a broad term to describe any obstruction of the urinary tract: congenital or acquired, complete or partial, temporary or permanent. Urinary obstruction can lead to the development of hydronephrosis and subsequent renal injury. The term hydronephrosis stems from Greek meaning “water kidney condition.” The rst descriptions of an enlarged water­lled kidney date back to the time of Hippocrates. At that time, urine was thought to be produced by the urinary bladder, and thus the exact pathophysiologic mechanism was not well under­stood often leading to morbid treatments until a more modern understanding emerged in the nineteenth century [1, 2].
Hydronephrosis is the result of inadequate drainage of urine relative to the amount of urine produced by the kidney. Inadequate drainage of the collecting system causes increased pressure within the collecting system reected into the renal tubules. In the acute setting (6–48h), increased pressure causes increased intraparenchymal vascular resistance, but this phe­nomenon often normalizes after 48 h [3]. Long- standing hydronephrosis can result in renal injury, brosis, and atrophy of the affected kidney [4, 5]. When hydronephrosis is unilat­eral, the contralateral kidney hypertrophies to compensate for the increased urine excretion. However, when both kidneys are affected, urine will not be adequately excreted and can result in electrolyte abnormalities and uremia, necessitating dialysis. If the cause of the hydronephrosis is treated when the kidney is still functioning with a GFR > 10mL/min/1.73 m renal injury can be partially or completely reversible [6]. As such, determining acuity of the hydronephrosis and resid­ual renal function is important for guiding management and preserving renal function.
2
, the
43
Causes of hydronephrosis can be classied into functional and obstructive etiologies. Functional hydroureteronephrosis (kidneys + ureter dilation) is normally seen in 80–90% of pregnancies, is more pronounced in primigravid patients, and will resolve by 6weeks postpartum [7]. This is thought to be due to ureteral compression at the pelvic brim with some evidence suggesting hormone alterations, mainly progester­one, can enhance the collecting system dilation. The right ureter is usually dilated more than the left due its acute angle as it courses over the iliac vessels [8].
Obstructive hydronephrosis will have varying etiology based on the patient’s age. In neonates and young children, anatomic abnormalities including congenital stenosis at the ureteropelvic/ureterovesicular junctions, vesicoureteral reux, or posterior urethral valves are the most likely etiology. In adults, the most common cause is urolithiasis; approximately
8.8% of adults in the United States have a history of at least one urinary calculus with the highest incidence in obese white males with a history of prior renal calculi [9]. In older adults, benign prostatic hyperplasia and urothelial carcinomas should also be considered, particularly in patients with hematuria. Other causes include urinary tract injury (including iatro­genic), strictures, obstructing infections (nephritis, cystitis, prostatitis), external compressing masses, and neurogenic bladder with inadequate/ineffective voiding.
Key Point
Most common cause of obstructive hydronephrosis.
In neonates and young children:
• UPJ or UVJ congenital stenosis
• Vesicoureteral reux
• Posterior urethral valves
In adults:
L. A. Byers · P. J. Rochon (*) University of Colorado, Department of Radiology, Aurora, CO, USA e-mail: luke.byers@ucdenver.edu; paul.rochon@udenver.edu
© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 N. A. Keefe et al. (eds.), IR Playbook, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71300-7_43
• Urolithiasis
• BPH
• Urothelial carcinoma
477
478
L. A. Byers and P. J. Rochon
Table 43.1 Signs and symptoms associated with hydronephrosis by
etiology
Urolithiasis Hematuria (gross or microscopic), ank pain,
Infection Fever, ank pain, costovertebral angle tenderness,
BPH LUTS Urothelial carcinoma Neurogenic bladder
a
Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) – frequency, urgency, hesi-
tancy, incomplete voiding, nocturia, dribbling, poor stream
Table 43.2 Risk factors for causes of hydronephrosis
Urolithiasis Prior urolithiasis
Infection Age (prevalence increases in men with age,
Urothelial carcinoma
Neurogenic bladder
BPH Male
costovertebral angle tenderness, dysuria
pyuria, dysuria, frequency, incomplete voiding
a
Persistent hematuria, weight loss, fatigue, anemia, frequency, urgency, incomplete voiding Perineal anesthesia, LUTS abuse/spinal cord injury/diabetes mellitus
Male > female White race Age Hyperuricosuria Hypercalciuria Hyperoxaluria Diabetes mellitus/metabolic syndrome Gout Urinary stricture/urinary stasis
decreases in women until age 65) History of prior urinary tract infection Diabetes mellitus Recent sexual intercourse Use of spermicide Urinary stasis Persistent bacteria in urine Recent instrumentation or indwelling hardware Age>65 Male >>female Smoking Industrial occupational history Chronic cystitis Lynch syndrome Diabetes mellitus Spinal cord injury Multiple sclerosis Pelvic surgery
Age
a
, history of alcohol
Hydronephrosis is often asymptomatic; however, when symptoms are present, they can help narrow the etiology of obstruction (Table43.1). Symptoms can be categorized into upper urinary tract symptoms (innate to the kidney) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS, innate to the bladder or prostate). Upper tract symptoms typically consist of ank pain and costovertebral angle tenderness. LUTS presents with frequency, urgency, hesitancy, incomplete voiding, nocturia, dribbling, and poor stream. The presence of oligu­ria (<400–500mL per day in adults) or anuria (<50–100mL per day in adults) in a well-hydrated patient should raise concern for hydronephrosis. Risk factors for common causes of obstructive uropathy in adults are listed in Table43.2 [913].
Table 43.3 Society of Fetal Urology hydronephrosis classication
Grade 0 Normal Grade 1 Mild dilated renal pelvis, normal parenchyma Grade 2 Mild dilated renal pelvis and calyces with normal
pelvicalyceal pattern and parenchyma
Grade 3 Moderate dilated renal pelvis and calyces with blunting
and attening of the renal papilla ± mild cortical thinning
Grade 4 Severe dilated renal pelvis and calyces with loss of
pelvicalyceal pattern and renal atrophy
Key Point
Oliguria is <400–500mL/day in adults. Anuria is <50–100mL/day in adults. In a well-hydrated patient, these raise the concern for
hydronephrosis.
Urologists grade the severity of hydronephrosis with the anterior-posterior renal pelvic diameter (APRPD) sys­tem originating from the neonatal literature. Radiologists use the Society of Fetal Ultrasound (SFU) grading system (Table43.3), with several aspects also applied to the adult patient. In order to use a consistent system, in 2014 a con­sensus statement endorsed by many pediatric urology and radiology societies was published recommending the use of a new urinary tract dilation (UTD) classication system as a means to predict renal injury in neonatal hydronephro­sis (Table43.4, Fig.43.1) [14, 15]. Despite these systems, standard grading of hydronephrosis demonstrates low inter-rater reliability in interpretation of severity when try­ing to differentiate different grades of moderate hydrone­phrosis [16].

Clinical Indication

With the many different causes of hydronephrosis, the patient’s presentation can be very different depending on the clinical scenario with hydronephrosis itself often being symptomatically occult. The diagnosis is usually made on subsequent imaging when urinary obstruction is suspected or when biomarkers suggest the present of kidney injury (ele­vated creatinine or BUN, electrolyte abnormalities). Initial testing can include transabdominal US ± Doppler or cross­sectional imaging including CT. In patients with suspected acute kidney injury, risk of further injury from intravenous contrast should always be weighed against the diagnostic utility added by IV contrast.
On US, hydronephrosis can be seen as increased renal pelvis and calyceal size. In more chronic injury, the renal cortex can become thinned, and the normal pelvicalyceal