Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3657_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
49 Мб
Скачать
186
A. M. Conway and R. J. Rosen
Table 16.1 Classication of vascular anomalies
Vascular tumors Vascular malformations Benign Locally aggressive Malignant Simple or combined
Infantile hemangioma
Congenital hemangioma Tufted hemangioma Papillary intralymphatic angioendothelioma
Spindle-cell hemangioma Epithelioid hemangioma Pyogenic granuloma
a
The four vascular anomalies that will be discussed in this chapter are in italics
Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma Angiosarcoma Capillary malformation
Retiform hemangioendothelioma Epithelioid
(PILA), Dabska tumor Composite hemangioendothelioma Arteriovenous
Kaposi sarcoma Arteriovenous stula
a
Vascular anomalies
Lymphatic malformation
hemangioendothelioma
Venous malformation
malformation
Fig. 16.1 Typical infantile hemangioma (classic “strawberry birthmark”)
hemangiomas undergo a spontaneous, gradual, but extensive involution. The diagnosis can be made on the history and physical examination alone. The lesion appears as a non­tender, slightly raised, bright-red lesion with well-dened but irregular margins (Fig.16.1).
Vascular Malformations
Vascular malformations are congenital lesions, resulting from a focal failure in embryonic angiogenesis. The result ranges from high-ow arteriovenous connections to low­ow lesions that may be venous, lymphatic, or a combina­tion of both. These lesions are almost always isolated anomalies in otherwise healthy individuals. A whole-body work-up looking for additional lesions is not indicated, nor is concern about other family members warranted. Other than certain unusual familial syndromes such as hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), also known as Osler-Weber-Rendu syndrome, they are generally not inherited.
While vascular malformations are by denition congeni-
tal, they may not manifest until later in childhood or even
adulthood as they grow with the individual. Presentation can vary depending on the size, ow, and location of the lesion. Symptoms may be related to mass effect or a hemodynamic effect on the affected circulation. A small lesion may have signicant consequences if it is located near a vital structure such as the eye or the airway. They may remain completely asymptomatic or present as a mass, pain, bleeding, growth disturbance, venous hypertension, ischemia, and, rarely, high-output cardiac state or failure.
It is important to differentiate vascular malformations as either high-ow or low-ow lesions. Arteriovenous malfor­mations and arteriovenous stulae are examples of high-ow lesions. Low-ow lesions include capillary, lymphatic, and venous malformations.
Arteriovenous Malformations (High Flow)
High-ow AVMs produce a far greater hemodynamic affect than low-ow venous malformations. The arteriovenous shunting in high-ow AVMs lacks the normal resistance of the capillary system and can cause signicant arterial steal leading to distal ischemia (Fig.16.2) [6].
16 Vascular Malformations
187
Venous Malformations (Low Flow)
Low-ow venous malformations are some of the most com­mon types of vascular malformations, with an overall prev­alence of up to 1% in the general population [7]. They are
Fig. 16.2 Ischemic ulceration of the thumb in a patient with an AVM
(high ow)
composed of abnormal venous channels and can have a spongy (“cavernous”) architecture. These lesions tend to ll and empty depending on position and activity, and it is this distension that usually accounts for the presenting complaints of pain, heaviness, or swelling (Fig. 16.3). Low-ow lesions may be isolated or seen as part of con­genital syndromes such as Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome, which is discussed separately later. Accelerated growth or symptomatology of vascular malformations in female patients may occur at the time of puberty or pregnancy; this hormonally triggered growth is well documented but not well understood. Trauma or surgical intervention may also cause a previously stable lesion to show an increase in size or symptoms.
Lymphatic Malformations
Lymphatic malformations can occur anywhere in the body and can be macrocystic lesions (e.g., the classic cystic hygroma in the neck) or microcystic lesions. They may also be dened as inltrative lesions and cutaneous lesions (Fig.16.4). In some patients, there can be low-ow lesions with mixed venous and lymphatic components, known as “venolymphatic malformations.” One of the hallmarks of lymphatic lesions is their tendency for infection, with fre­quent fever and signs of cellulitis.
Fig. 16.3 Low-ow venous malformation involving the right chest
wall. Lesion is poorly dened, soft, compressible, and nonpulsatile
Fig. 16.4 T2 axial MRI of
the neck of two separate patients demonstrating (a) macrocystic lymphatic malformation and (b) microcystic lymphatic malformation

Clinical Indication

Successful treatment of vascular malformations is dependent on making an accurate diagnosis. A thorough history and physical exam can aid in diagnosis prior to imaging. Frequently, patients present with swelling that should be assessed both in the supine and dependent position to assess any dynamic impact on the lesion. High-ow AVMs may have a palpable thrill and the skin will also feel warm to touch. A bruit may be auscultated.
188
The diagnosis of low-ow venous malformations is gen­erally simple when the lesion is accessible to physical exam­ination, presenting as a soft, spongy mass that lls and empties either by manual compression or change in depen­dency. If the lesion is supercial, a characteristic bluish dis­coloration may be noted; extremely supercial lesions may also present with spontaneous ulceration and bleeding. No pulsation or thrill is palpable, and these lesions are non­tender except when complicated by the inammatory changes of superimposed thrombosis. Bead-like nodules (phleboliths) may be palpated, representing calcied sites of prior thrombosis, which are clearly identied on plain lms as rounded calcications and are pathognomonic of purely venous malformations.
A. M. Conway and R. J. Rosen
Fig. 16.5 T1 axial MRI with contrast of an intramuscular venous mal-
formation involving the forearm. Findings typical of a well-dened slow-ow lesion
Key Point
Phleboliths are calcied sites of prior venous thrombo­sis and can be palpated as bead-like nodules. These are pathognomonic of a purely venous malformation.
To evaluate the characteristics of vascular malformations, multiple imaging modalities are used. Conventional radiol­ogy has a limited role only providing information on phlebo­liths and bony changes if they exist. US with Doppler is considered the imaging modality of choice for initial assess­ment and characterization of presumed vascular origin due to its ease of accessibility and lack of radiation. It allows a real- time visualization of the lesion with differential diagno­sis between the high- and low-ow lesions. Due to rapid acquisition time and temporal resolution with contrast enhancement, multidetector CT is especially useful for AVM lesions. MRI in combination with dynamic time-resolved contrast material-enhanced MR angiography provides a comprehensive assessment of vascular anomalies including diagnosis with information on the hemodynamics, extension, particularly deeper lesions, and anatomic relationship to adjacent structures. At present, MR imaging is the most valu­able modality for classication of vascular anomalies. Images clearly show the low-ow mass as bright signal on T1 and T2 sequences (Fig.16.5).

Conventional Therapy

Vascular malformations remain a difcult condition to treat. In the latter quarter of the twentieth century, experience in treating these conditions grew. Imaging studies such as MRI and CT were crucial to gain understanding of the extent and complexity of individual malformations [8]. Conventional therapy consisted of surgical resection; however, this often yielded poor results, with signicant morbidity. Widespread resections led to damage on adjacent structures as well as
signicant blood loss. The recurrence rate was high and amputations were frequently performed [9, 10].
Treatment of vascular malformations is a controversial subject, compounded by the complex and variable nature of these lesions. There is general agreement that asymptomatic, stable malformations do not and may never require treatment [11]. As time progresses, the combined effects of ischemia from arterial steal in high-ow AVMs and venous hyperten­sion may cause an asymptomatic lesion to become symp­tomatic warranting treatment.
Low-ow venous malformations typically consist of frag­ile vasculature that may be inltrative to surrounding struc­tures. They have a spongy appearance, and any attempt at surgical resection can lead to signicant blood loss. Careful dissection is needed to avoid damage to adjacent structures. High-ow AVMs were historically surgically resected; with advances in endovascular techniques, preoperative emboliza­tion typically occurs in conjunction with surgical resection to reduce ow through the nidus. Focal AVMs may be resected with good results; however, diffuse lesions are more difcult to treat [12]. Amputation may be required in extreme cases.
Although not a true vascular malformation, due to confu­sion among practitioners, the interventionalist will often be called upon to assess hemangiomas. Endovascular interven­tions are rarely required and most are of cosmetic concern only. In such occurrences, simple reassurance is all that is needed. While corticosteroids were for many years the rst line of treatment for problematic hemangiomas, there is increasing use of the beta-blocker propranolol orally, which has been shown to both inhibit the growth and accelerate regression of these lesions [13].

Interventional Therapy

Interventional therapy has replaced traditional surgical resec­tions as the principle management strategy for many vascular malformations. While a cure may not always be achievable,
16 Vascular Malformations
189
signicant improvements in patients’ symptoms can be made. Super-selective catheterization of feeding vessels, and the use of embolic and sclerosing agents, has dramatically improved our ability as interventionalists to treat these conditions.
Key Point
Patient expectations should be tempered as treatment may require multiple procedures and cure is not always achievable.
For the purposes of treatment, high-ow and low-ow lesions can be considered as distinct entities and are dis­cussed separately below.
High-Flow AVMs
Treatment for high-ow lesions is indicated when there is a signicant mass, pain, bleeding, ischemia, growth distur­bance, or high-output cardiac state. Preoperative imaging includes ultrasonography, magnetic resonance angiography, and/or CT angiography. Cosmetically disguring lesions should be considered symptomatic, especially in children, where there can be psychosocial consequences [14].
The goal in treating high-ow AVMs is to eliminate the nidus. This low-pressure sump is the stimulus for recurrence via collateral recruitment. The complexity of the arterial sup­ply in most AVMs makes treating these lesions difcult, and identication of the site of shunting is essential. Occluding feeding vessels proximally should not be performed, as while it may lead to an immediate satisfactory angiographic result, collateral recruitment and recurrence of the lesion are inevitable. Proximal occlusion makes the lesion increasingly difcult to re-treat. The goal must be to penetrate and occlude the actual nidus of the lesion [15].
There remains no ideal embolic agent for treating high­ow AVMs. Each available embolic agent compromises patient safety, procedural efcacy, or both. Currently, both particulate, including PVA particles or microspheres, and liquid embolic agents are used. Sometimes these provide only temporary results, with recurrences generally develop­ing within weeks to months.
Liquid agents offer an alternative to particulates and have been used as a treatment for AVMs for nearly 30years [16,
17]. Ethanol is a direct tissue toxin and works by causing
acute thrombosis and endothelial injury. Its use in AVM embolization was rst reported in 1984 and has subsequently been widely used clinically [18, 19]. It is a highly effective agent but must be used with a great deal of caution due to its intrinsic toxicity. The complications of ethanol include skin necrosis, skin swelling, neuropathy, pulmonary artery spasm, cardiac arrhythmia, and cardiopulmonary collapse [20, 21].
n-Butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (nBCA) is nontoxic and has the ability to form a large vessel cast using small amounts of the agent. It polymerizes almost instantaneously on contact with any ionic medium, including saline, contrast, blood, and tis­sue. Intravascular acrylic adhesive nBCA “glue” is not as potent an agent as ethanol and is less likely to completely eradicate the lesion, but it has a much wider safety margin in terms of complications.
Liquid embolic agent ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH, e.g., Onyx, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) has shown signicant promise in treating high-ow lesions. Both it and cyanoacrylate adhesives are only approved for cere­brovascular uses in the USA; nevertheless, there have been several reports of good clinical results using EVOH else­where in the body in high-ow lesions [22].
Up to 20% of high-ow AVMs have a dominant outow vein. An increasing number of reports have described the transvenous approach to occlude outow veins [23, 24]. Occlusion of the venous outow reduces ow through the nidus, leading to thrombosis.
The How To: High-Flow AVMs
1. The patient is typically placed under general endo­tracheal or laryngeal mask anesthesia, depending on the location of the lesion and the need to control respiration.
2. A prophylactic dose of antibiotics and steroids are administered.
3. Arterial access is obtained using the Seldinger tech­nique and a micropuncture kit (refer to Chap. 8 for more information).
4. Angiography of the area of malformation is performed.
5. Super-selective catheterization of arterial feeding branches is performed to adequately visualize the malformation.
6. The chosen embolic agents are prepared. nBCA is low in viscosity and can be used through microcath­eters. It can also be administered through 22G nee­dles in direct puncture applications. A typical set up
16.6.
7. When using nBCA glue, the average deposition of adhesive per injection ranges between 0.2 and
larger cast is obtained due to the incorporation of
16.7). When using different
embolic agents, the technique remains the same. When selecting doses, the interventionalist should refer to manufacturer’s guidelines.
8. Completion angiograms are performed.
190
Fig. 16.6 nBCA “glue”
setup includes separate preparation area: (a) ethiodol (for opacication and to slow polymerization), (b) 5% dextrose in water as a ush solution, (c) nBCA adhesive
A. M. Conway and R. J. Rosen
Fig. 16.7 (a) Angiogram of lower extremity demonstrating high-ow
AVM of the foot supplied by branches of the anterior and posterior tibial artery. (b) Direct puncture with administration of 0.2cc of nBCA.
Low-Flow Venous Malformations
Endovascular approaches to low-ow venous malformations consist of forms of sclerotherapy. The goal is to thrombose the lesion and damage the endothelial lining, so that when the clot is reabsorbed, brosis develops. Early attempts to embolize the normal-appearing arteries supplying the area of the venous malformation were found to be ineffective. As such, an arterial approach is not generally warranted.
The technique of direct puncture embolization is fairly sim­ple and is an extension of the direct puncture technique rst used to study these lesions [25]. The lesion is entered directly, either with a sheathed or a micropuncture needle until blood return is noted, which may be quite slow. Contrast is slowly
(c) Post-embolization angiogram showing reduced ow through the AVM nidus with preservation of normal branches
hand injected under uoroscopic guidance, demonstrating “uffy” appearing spaces of the venous malformation.
It is often necessary to use some sort of compression to keep the sclerosant within the lesion. This can be done with an automatic tourniquet applied to the extremity, inated above diastolic but lower than systolic pressure. If the drain­ing vein is accessible to direct compression, this can also be done using a gloved hand or pressure with a surgical clamp.
Commonly used sclerosants include ethanol, sodium tet­radecyl sulfate (STS), bleomycin, and doxycycline. STS has gained popularity in recent years. It is prepared as foam, which increases surface contact and sclerosant effect [26]. STS also appears to have a reduced level of neurotox­icity and less likelihood of skin ulceration in comparison with ethanol.
16 Vascular Malformations
The How To: Low-Flow Venous Malformations
1. The procedure is routinely performed under general anesthesia.
2. An IV is placed distal to the lesion, and a dilute solution of heparinized saline is continuously infused. This reduces the risk of causing deep vein thrombosis due to spillage of the sclerosant into the deep system.
3. The lesion is entered with a 22G micropuncture nee-
4.
16.8). When the capacity of
the lesion has been reached, one or more normal-
which connect to the normal deep veins of the anatomic region.
5. The sclerosing agent is then slowly injected under
As thrombosis occurs, the lesion will become
191
16.9).
kilogram is used when using ethanol.
6. small amount of collagen suspension as each micro­puncture needle is withdrawn, which not only pro­vides hemostasis at the injection site but also reduces the risk of ulceration due to the agent tracking back to the skin entry site.
Postoperative care should include hydration and adequate analgesia. Limb elevation to reduce swelling is routine in low-ow malformations, and in some situations compression may be used. A short multiday course of tapering steroids can reduce the amount of swelling. Many patients can be discharged the same day; however if there is concern for swelling and any potential of compartment syndrome fol­lowing embolization of an extremity malformation, then the patient should be observed overnight. Hydration is essential in this patient population to clear any hematuria caused by hemolysis.
Treatment requires 4–6weeks to take full effect; therefore if multiple treatments are necessary, they are typically spaced 6–8weeks apart. If symptoms persist, further interventions can be performed. The total number of treatments is difcult to predict but can range from one to over ten in extensive cases with an average of three. Further imaging is necessi­tated by ongoing symptoms.
Complications include, but are not limited to, pain, swell­ing, blistering, and ulceration of the skin. Limiting the
Fig. 16.8 Fluoroscopic image of a direct puncture of a venous malfor-
mation of the lower extremity with a 22G micropuncture needle fol­lowed by contrast administration
Fig. 16.9 Sodium tetradecyl sulfate is now commonly used for sclero-
therapy of venous malformations. When prepared as foam (as above), there is greater surface contact throughout the malformation and more intense thrombosis
amount of contrast can reduce the potential for acute kidney injury associated with contrast-induced nephropathy. One should be aware of the potential for compartment syndrome, especially when treating a malformation in the extremities. Avoiding excessive treatment and contrast extravasation are imperative.
192
Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome
Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome (KTS), rst described in 1900, is a well-known complex venous malformation that gener­ally involves a single extremity, usually the leg [27]. The syndrome is congenital but not genetically transmitted and generally occurs in otherwise healthy individuals. It consists of a cutaneous capillary malformation (“port wine stain”), varicose veins, and limb hypertrophy. Hypoplasia of the nor­mal deep system may be present. Bone and soft tissue abnor­malities can also occur (Fig.16.10). Some patients will also have a patent vena marginalis lateralis (“KT vein”), a persis­tent embryonic draining vein that ascends along the lateral aspect of the leg and can be associated with reux and swell­ing due to lack of valves. The mildest forms of KTS appear as unilateral varicose veins in an extremity, while the most severe forms can extend into the pelvis and abdomen with potentially life-threatening complications from bleeding.
Key Point
Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome consists of:
A. M. Conway and R. J. Rosen
• Port wine stain
• Varicose vines
• Limb hypertrophy, usually of a single leg
Treatment is difcult and usually conservative, consisting of support stockings. Sclerotherapy can be effective to treat symptomatic varicose veins and swelling locally. Endovenous techniques (laser, radiofrequency ablation) have also been used in treating the venous malformations, especially for occluding the KT vein [28]. It is essential to image the status of the deep venous system with ultrasonography or a diagnostic venogram prior to any intervention, in order to rule out a hypoplastic or absent deep venous system. Ablating the abnormal channels in this setting may result in marked worsening of the clinical situation.
Lymphatic Malformations
Lymphatic malformations are among the most difcult to treat successfully. Large cystic lesions can be treated with drainage and sclerotherapy. Standard sclerosants are typi­cally used, specically doxycycline and bleomycin. More supercial microcystic lesions may be amenable to resection and skin grafting, as well as surface laser treatment. Congenital lymphedema syndromes, which may occur with or without focal lesions, are most effectively managed with compression and massage therapy as well as custom-tted support garments.
Fig. 16.10 Typical ndings of Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome

References

1. Persaud TVN.Problems of birth defects. From Hippocrates to tha­lidomide and after. In: Persaud TVN part I belief, mythology, magic and superstition. Commentary. Baltimore: University Park Press Maryland Publishers; 1977. p.3–4.
2. Belov S.Classication, terminology, and nosology of congenital vascular defects. In: Belov S, Loose DA, Weber J, editors. Vascular malformations. Reinbek: Einhorn-Presse; 1989. p.25–30.
3. Kennedy WP. Epidemiologic aspects of the problem of congeni­tal malformations. In: Persaud TNV problems of birth defects. Baltimore: Publisher University Park Press; 1977. p.35–52.
4. International society for the study of vascular anomalies. Approved at the 20th ISSVA workshop, Melbourne, Apr 2014. Retrieved from http://www.issva.org/UserFiles/le/Classications-2014-
Abbreviated.pdf.
5. Mulliken JB, Glowacki J.Hemangiomas and vascular malforma­tions in infants and children: a classication based on endothelial characteristics. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;69(3):412–22.
6. Jeon YH, Do YS, Shin SW, etal. Ethanol embolization of arterio­venous malformations: results and complications of 33 cases. JKor Radiol Soc. 2003;49:263–70.
7. Madani H, Farrant J, Chhaya N, Anwar I, Marmery H, Platts A, Holloway B.Peripheral limb vascular malformations: an update of appropriate imaging and treatment options of a challenging condi­tion. Br JRadiol. 2015;88(1047):20140406.
8. Szilagyi DE, Smith RF, Elliott JP, Hageman JH.Congenital arterio­venous anomalies of the limbs. Arch Surg. 1976;111(4):423–9.
9. Kinmonth JB, Young AE, Edwards JM, O'Donnell TF, Thomas ML. Mixed vascular deformities of the lower limbs, with particular
16 Vascular Malformations
193
reference to lymphography and surgical treatment. Br J Surg. 1976;63(12):899–906.
10. Mendel T, Louis DS.Major vascular malformations of the upper extremity: long-term observation. JHand Surg. 1997;22A:302.
11. Natali J, Merland JJ. Superselective arteriography and therapeu­tic embolization for vascular malformations (angiodysplasias). JCardiovasc Surg. 1976;17:465.
12. Cronenwett JL, Johnston KW.Rutherford’s vascular surgery. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2010. p.1072–5.
13. Léauté-Labrèze C, Dumas de la Roque E, Hubiche T, Boralevi F, Thambo JB, Taïeb A. Propranolol for severe hemangiomas of infancy. N Engl JMed. 2008;358(24):2649–51.
14. Williams EF 3rd, Hochman M, Rodgers BJ, Brockbank D, Shannon L, Lam SMA.Psychological prole of children with hemangiomas and their families. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003;5(3):229–34.
15. Kerber C.Intracranial cyoanacrylate: a new catheter therapy for arteriovenous malformation. Investig Radiol. 1975;10:536–8.
16. Vintner V, Galil KA, Lundie MJ, Kaufmann JCE.The histotoxicity of cyanoacrylates. Neuroradiology. 1985;27:279–91.
17. John HT, Warren R.The stimulus to collateral circulation. Surgery. 1961;49:14.
18. Sasaki GH, Pang CY, Wittliff JL. Pathogenesis and treatment of infant skin strawberry hemangiomas: clinical and invitro studies of hormonal effects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;73(3):359–70.
19. Yakes WF, Haas DK, Parker SH, Gibson MD, Hopper KD, Mulligan JS, etal. Symptomatic vascular malformations: ethanol embolotherapy. Radiology. 1989;170:1059–66.
20. Do YS, Park KB, Cho S. How do we treat arteriovenous mal­formations (tips and tricks)? Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007;10: 291–8.
21. Bae S, Do YS, Shin SW, Park KB, Kim DI, Kim YW, etal. Ethanol embolotherapy of pelvic arteriovenous malformations: an initial experience. Korean JRadiol. 2008;9:148–54.
22. Numan F, Omeroglu A, Kara B, Cantaşdemir M, Adaletli I, Kantarci F. Embolization of peripheral vascular malformations with ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (Onyx). J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;15(9):939–46.
23. Conway AM, Qato K, Drury J, Rosen RJ.Embolization techniques for high-ow arteriovenous malformations with a dominant outow vein. JVasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2015;3(2):178–83.
24. Cho SK, Do YS, Kim DI, Kim YW, Shin SW, Park KB, et al. Peripheral arteriovenous malformations with a dominant out­ow vein: results of ethanol embolization. Korean J Radiol. 2008;9:258–67.
25. Boxt LM, Levin DC, Fellows KE.Direct puncture angiography in congenital venous malformations. AJR. 1983;140:135.
26. Hsu TS, Weiss RA.Foam sclerotherapy: a new era. Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(11):1494–6.
27. Klippel M, Trenaunay P.Du naevus variqueux osterhypertrophique. Arch Gen Med (Paris). 1900;3:611.
28. Huang Y, Jiang M, Li W. Endovenous laser treatment com­bined with a surgical strategy for treatment of venous insuf­ciency in lower extremity: report of 208 cases. JVasc Surg. 2005;42(3):494–501.
Part IV
The Aorta
Abdominal andThoracic Aortic Aneurysms
AndyLee andMichaelD.Dake

Pathophysiology

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA)
The infrarenal abdominal aorta is considered aneurysmal if the diameter measures >3cm or 1.5 times the normal diam­eter [1]. Aneurysm rupture is associated with a high morbid­ity and mortality; 30–50% of patients die prior to being able to undergo treatment, frequently before even reaching the emergency department [24]. Parkinson etal. reported that only 42% of those that are treated actually survive the post­operative period [5]. Accounting for approximately 15,000 deaths per year in the United States, the associated high mor­tality of rupture has been inuential in our current screening, medical and operative management, and guidelines for approaching abdominal aortic aneurysms [1, 6].
While the exact mechanisms of AAA formation remain unclear, atherosclerosis often plays a causative role in AAA formation [7]. Atherosclerotic changes initiate a remodeling process in the extracellular matrix and adventitial compo­nents of the vessel wall that involves various inammatory pathways, matrix degradation, thrombosis, hemodynamic forces, and a host of associated signaling molecules in AAA pathogenesis [8, 9].
Substantial research has also corroborated the involve­ment of environmental, hemodynamic, and immunological factors in the development of aneurysms [10]. The rst clear
A. Lee Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Vascular Surgery, Boston, MA, USA e-mail: alee10@bidmc.harvard.edu
M. D. Dake ( Stanford University Medical Center, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford, CA, USA e-mail: mddake@stanford.edu
*)
17
association between smoking and aneurysm formation was attributed to the Framingham study in 1969 [11]. In fact, cigarette smoking is the risk factor most strongly associated with aneurysm development, rupture, and expansion. The 2009 practice guidelines from the Society for Vascular Surgery note that there is strong evidence that smoking ces­sation reduces the risk of AAA growth and rupture [12]. At the present time, smoking cessation should be considered one of the most important recommendations to decrease the rate of aneurysm expansion [13]. This illustrates the molecu­lar and multifactorial complexity of aneurysm formation while providing a target for medical directed therapy.
Key Point
Cigarette smoking is strongly associated with aneu­rysm formation. Smoking cessation is one of the most important recommendations to decrease the rate of aneurysm expansion.
Abdominal aortic aneurysms can be categorized into four subtypes based on the proximal extent: suprarenal, pararenal, juxtarenal, and infrarenal (Fig.17.1). Suprarenal aneurysms extend above the renals and involve the origin of one or more of the visceral arteries but do not extend into the chest. Pararenal aneurysms involve the renal arteries but the superior mesenteric artery is non-aneurysmal. Juxtarenal aneurysms originate just distal to the origin of the renal arteries on the aorta. There is generally no aneu­rysm-free aorta between the renal arteries and origin of the aneurysm. Infrarenal aneurysms, the easiest to treat endo­vascularly, have a 1 cm non-aneurysmal segment or “neck” of aorta distal to the renal arteries prior to the aneu­rysm [14]. There are also classication systems for describ­ing the degree of distal extent into the common or internal iliac arteries.
© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 N. A. Keefe et al. (eds.), IR Playbook, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71300-7_17
197