Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3657_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
49 Мб
Скачать
32 Visceral andSolid Organ Trauma
367
Fig. 32.7 A 23-year-old female with a grade V renal laceration as seen
on coronal (a) and axial (b) imaging. Angiography demonstrates renal artery pseudoaneurysm, active extravasation, and extensive parenchy-
4. Renal artery catheterization is typically performed with a 5 Fr catheter followed by digital subtraction angiography, often in AP and ipsilateral projections.
5.
­fully crossed with a guidewire and catheter or microcatheter. Angiography distal to the injury is performed to ensure location within the true lumen.
occlude life-threatening bleeding and is followed by placement of a stent or stent graft across the arte­rial injury.
mal injury (c and d). Digital subtraction angiography following coil embolization for hemodynamic instability demonstrates complete occlusion beyond the mid-right renal artery (e)
6. is then further selected with either the 5 Fr catheter or a coaxial microcatheter. The microcatheter sys­tem is advanced super-selectively to the area of injury, and embolization is performed with an embolic agent of choice.
7. Completion renal angiography is performed from the renal artery through the 5 Fr catheter or sheath to ensure endpoint has been obtained and to verify absence of additional angiographic abnormalities warranting treatment.
368
K. J. Nelson and M. Daun
Despite the high success rate of RAE, complications do occur. Repeat embolization may be required and has been associated with higher trauma grade [29]. Nontarget emboli­zation is rare. Post-embolization syndrome is self-limited and occurs in a small minority of patients; it is characterized by fever, leukocytosis, and back pain. Potential complica­tions also include arterial hypertension, decreased renal function, and abscess. Late-term complications following blunt or penetrating renal trauma include the development of pseudoaneurysm or arteriovenous stulas, which may occur even in patients who demonstrate spontaneous control of bleeding with expectant management only. Presentation with delayed symptoms such as pain or hematuria may occur up to months or even years following the traumatic insult [32].
Key Point
Complications of renal artery embolization include arterial hypertension, decreased renal function, abscess, pseudoaneurysm, and AV stula.
Post-procedure
Patients are closely monitored as inpatients following blunt renal trauma. Duration of hospital stay varies by severity of renal injury and management, with median hospital stays following grade V injury ranging from 13days for NOM to 22days for operative management [29].

References

1. Miller P, Chang M, Hoth J, Mowery N, Hildreth A, Martin R, etal. Prospective trial of angiography and embolization for all grade III to V blunt splenic injuries: nonoperative management success rate is signicantly improved. JAm Coll Surg. 2014;218(4):644–8.
2. Olthof D, van der Vlies C, Joosse P, van Delden O, Jurkovich G, Goslings J.Consensus strategies for the nonoperative management of patients with blunt splenic injury. JTrauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(6):1567–74.
3. Cales R, Trunkey D.Preventable trauma deaths. A review of trauma care systems development. JAMA. 1985;254(8):1059–63.
4. Soto J, Anderson S.Multidetector CT of blunt abdominal trauma. Radiology. 2012;265(3):678–93.
5. Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Jurkovich GJ, Shackford SR, Malangoni MA, Champion HR.Organ injury scaling: spleen and liver (1994 revision). JTrauma Acute Care Surg. 1995;38(3):323–4.
6. Hagiwara A, Fukushima H, Murata A, Matsuda H, Shimazaki S.Blunt splenic injury: usefulness of transcatheter arterial emboli­zation in patients with a transient response to uid resuscitation 1. Radiology. 2005;235(1):57–64.
7. Beuran M, Gheju I, Venter MD, Marian RC, Smarandache R.Non­operative management of splenic trauma. JMed Life. 2012;5(1):47.
8. Uranüs S, Pfeifer J.Nonoperative treatment of blunt splenic injury. World JSurg. 2001;25(11):1405–7.
9. Schroeppel TJ, Croce MA.Diagnosis and management of blunt abdom­inal solid organ injury. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007;13(4):399–404.
10. Schnüriger B, Inaba K, Konstantinidis A, Lustenberger T, Chan LS, Demetriades D.Outcomes of proximal versus distal splenic artery
embolization after trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JTrauma. 2011;70(1):252–60.
11. Ekeh AP, Khalaf S, Ilyas S, Kauffman S, Walusimbi M, McCarthy MC. Complications arising from splenic artery embolization: a review of an 11-year experience. Am JSurg. 2013;205(3):250–4.
12. Frandon J, Rodière M, Arvieux C, Michoud M, Vendrell A, Broux C, etal. Blunt splenic injury: outcomes of proximal versus distal and combined splenic artery embolization. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2014;95(9):825–31.
13. McIntyre LK, Schiff M, Jurkovich GJ. Failure of nonoperative management of splenic injuries: causes and consequences. Arch Surg. 2005;140(6):563–9.
14. Leeper WR, Leeper TJ, Ouellette D, Moffat B, Sivakumaran T, Charyk-Stewart T, etal. Delayed hemorrhagic complications in the nonoperative management of blunt splenic trauma: early screen­ing leads to a decrease in failure rate. JTrauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(6):1349–53.
15. Jahromi AH, Migliaro M, Romano M, Sangster G.Delayed splenic rupture; normal appearing spleen on the initial multidetector com­puted tomography (MDCT) can sometimes be misleading. Trauma Mon. 2016;21(5):e24465.
16. Wahl WL, Ahrns KS, Chen S, Hemmila MR, Rowe SA, Arbabi S. Blunt splenic injury: operation versus angiographic emboliza­tion. Surgery. 2004;136(4):891–9.
17. Dake M, Geschwind J, editors. Abrams’ angiography: interven­tional radiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.
18. Hiatt JR, Gabbay J, Busuttil RW.Surgical anatomy of the hepatic arteries in 1000 cases. Ann Surg. 1994;220(1):50.
19. Stassen NA, Bhullar I, Cheng JD, Crandall M, Friese R, Guillamondegui O, et al. Nonoperative management of blunt hepatic injury: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(5):S288–93.
20. Arvieux C, Letoublon C. Abbreviated laparotomy. J Chirurg. 2000;137(3):133–41.
21. Tinkoff G, Esposito TJ, Reed J, Kilgo P, Fildes J, Pasquale M, Meredith JW. American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale I: spleen, liver, and kidney, valida­tion based on the National Trauma Data Bank. JAm Coll Surg. 2008;207(5):646–55.
22. Green CS, Bulger EM, Kwan SW.Outcomes and complications of angioembolization for hepatic trauma: a systematic review of the literature. JTrauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80(3):529–37.
23. Melloul E, Denys A, Demartines N. Management of severe blunt hepatic injury in the era of computed tomography and transarte­rial embolization: a systematic review and critical appraisal of the literature. JTrauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79(3):468–74.
24. Kozar RA, Moore FA, Cothren CC, Moore EE, Sena M, Bulger EM, et al. Risk factors for hepatic morbidity follow­ing nonoperative management: multicenter study. Arch Surg. 2006;141(5):451–9.
25. Venkatesan AM, Kundu S, Sacks D, Wallace MJ, Wojak JC, Rose SC, et al. Practice guideline for adult antibiotic prophylaxis dur­ing vascular and interventional radiology procedures. JVasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(11):1611–30.
26. Richardson JD, Franklin GA, Lukan JK, Carrillo EH, Spain DA, Miller FB, etal. Evolution in the management of hepatic trauma: a 25-year perspective. Ann Surg. 2000;232(3):324–30.
27. Maarouf AM, Ahmed AF, Shalaby E, Badran Y, Salem E, Zaiton F.Factors predicting the outcome of non-operative management of high-grade blunt renal trauma. Afr JUrol. 2015;21(1):44–51.
28. Moore EE, Shackford SR, Pachter HL, McAninch JW, Browner BD, Champion HR, etal. Organ injury scaling: spleen, liver, and kidney. JTrauma Acute Care Surg. 1989;29(12):1664–6.
29. Lanchon C, Fiard G, Arnoux V, Descotes JL, Rambeaud JJ, Terrier N, etal. High grade blunt renal trauma: predictors of surgery and
32 Visceral andSolid Organ Trauma
369
long-term outcomes of conservative management. A prospective single center study. JUrol. 2016;195(1):106–11.
30. Miller KS, McAninch JW. Radiographic assessment of renal trauma: our 15-year experience. JUrol. 1995;154(2):352–5.
31. Vozianov S, Sabadash M, Shulyak A.Experience of renal artery embolization in patients with blunt kidney trauma. Cen Eur JUrol. 2015;68(4):471–7.
32. Dinkel HP, Danuser H, Triller J.Blunt renal trauma: minimally invasive management with microcatheter embolization—experi­ence in nine patients 1. Radiology. 2002;223(3):723–30.
33. Beyer C, Zakaluzny S, Humphries M, Shatz D.Multidisciplinary management of blunt renal artery injury with endovascular therapy in the setting of polytrauma: a case report and review of the litera­ture. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017;38:318–e11.
Pelvic andExtremity Trauma
HowardM.Richard
33

Pathophysiology

An anonymous Czech surgeon is quoted as saying “bloody vascular trauma– it’s either bleeding too much or it’s not bleeding enough.” “Bleeding too much” will result in hemor­rhagic shock, multi-system organ failure, exsanguination, and death. “Not bleeding enough” can result in ischemia, limb loss, and stroke. Pelvic and extremity trauma is com­prised of blunt and penetrating trauma to the pelvis and extremities. Blunt trauma is typically the result of a motor vehicle collision, crush injury, or fall from signicant height. Penetrating trauma is typically the result of a missile injury such as a gunshot wound or stab wound. Vascular injury can result in either bleeding or ischemia.
Initial management of the trauma patient usually follows the standard ABCs: airway, breathing, and circulation [1, 2]. Once the initial trauma survey is complete, the history and physical examination will direct the ongoing management of the patients’ injuries. Upon arrival in the hospital, plain lms, ultrasound (FAST exam), and CT are utilized to fur­ther characterize the extent of injuries and direct further management.
• Pericardium (subxiphoid)
• Morrison’s pouch (RUQ)
• Left perisplenic space (LUQ)
• Pouch of Douglas (suprapubic)
Pelvic Fractures
Pelvic fractures are categorized into lateral compression, anterior posterior compression, and vertical shear types of injuries [3]. Acetabular fractures can be classied as posterior wall/column, anterior wall/column, or transverse [4].
Of pelvic ring fractures, 58% are not associated with an acetabular fracture, while 32% of fractures are isolated ace­tabular fractures [5, 6]. A pelvic fracture in combination with an acetabular fracture is identied in 10% of pelvic fractures. Lateral compression fractures are typically seen in motor vehicle collisions in which the driver or passenger are hit from the side, aka “T-boned.” Anterior posterior compression frac­tures can also be described as open-book fractures as there is typically a large diastasis of the pubic symphysis. Vertical shear injuries are typically identied after a fall from a height or a vertical stress applied to one side of the pelvis.
Key Point
Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) scan aims to look quickly for free uid, assumed hemoperitoneum in the trauma patient. Four regions are scanned:
H. M. Richard (*) University of Maryland School of Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA e-mail: hrichard@umm.edu
© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 N. A. Keefe et al. (eds.), IR Playbook, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71300-7_33
Key Point
Pelvic ring fracture=58%.
Acetabular fracture=32%.
Pelvic ring + acetabulum fracture=10%.
Pelvic fracture patterns can predict vascular arterial injury patterns [7] (Table 33.1). The superior gluteal and internal pudendal arteries are most commonly injured arteries, while the deep circumex iliac and inferior epigastric arteries are more rarely injured. Anterior posterior compression or open- book fractures are often associated with arterial vascular
371
372
H. M. Richard
injury [8]. Lateral compression and vertical shear fractures are less likely to be associated with signicant vascular injury. Patients older than 60 can have calcied arteries that may not be as effective in vasoconstricting. Therefore, they are prone to active bleeding at a higher rate and inlocations that are harder to predict. In fact, it is prudent to study patients who are older than 60 with pelvic angiography regardless of presenting hemodynamic stability [9].
Extremity Fractures
Extremity fractures can be classied as open or closed depending on the presence of skin laceration secondary to the bone fragment. Open fractures can be classied based on the severity ranging from a grade 1 to grade 3 injury which can be associated with signicant arterial injuries based on the Gustilo classication system; of these, Gustilo class 3C involves arterial injury (Table33.2) [10].
Risk factors for amputation include Gustilo 3C, sciatic or tibial nerve injury in the lower extremity, transection of two of three upper extremity nerves, prolonged ischemia greater than for 6h, extensive crush or destructive soft tissue injury, or signicant wound contamination.

Clinical Indication

Initial management of pelvic and extremity trauma outside of the hospital setting focuses on control of bleeding and pre­liminary splinting of obvious fractures. Upon transfer to a trauma center, the patient’s ABCs are evaluated and stabi­lized. A comprehensive physical examination and directed imaging ndings will dictate further treatment.
The history of the trauma should focus on mechanism of injury and include time of injury, presenting Glasgow Coma
Table 33.1 Site of possible vessel injury based on fracture location
[7, 8]
Site of fracture Likely site of vessel injury Anterior posterior compression
fracture Pubic rami and open-book fractures Internal or external pudendal
Acetabular fracture Superior gluteal artery
Superior gluteal artery Internal pudendal artery
artery
Score (GCS) and initial resuscitation efforts including the amount of uids administered and pressor and transfusion requirements. Physical exam should document ongoing swell­ing or hematoma formation as well as a detailed neurological and distal pulse examination with arterial brachial indices (blood pressure of the injured limb/uninjured limb) if feasible. A value of less than 0.9 is abnormal and requires further atten­tion [11]. Serial monitoring of the ABI is usually warranted.
Following stabilization of the airways, breathing, and central circulation, attention can be directed toward management of pelvic and extremity trauma [11]. The key tenants are control of bleeding and restoration of normal circulation. Control of bleed­ing begins with manual compression, with direct handheld pres­sure over the arterial injury. An aortic balloon catheter can be placed at the bedside before surgery to tamponade bleeding. Volume resuscitation with 3:1:1 packed RBCs, platelets, and FFP is used for large transfusion requirements. Prior to control of bleeding, minimal IV uids are administered as raising the blood pressure is counterproductive. After control of bleeding, aggressive volume resuscitation is undertaken with warmed u­ids, blood, and clotting factors [2, 11].
Hard signs of vascular injury include active bleeding, expanding pulsatile hematoma, bruit or thrill over wound, absent distal pulses, or distal ischemic changes and mandate immediate operative exploration and repair. Soft signs of vas­cular injury include small non-expanding hematoma, periph­eral nerve decit, history of severe bleeding at the time of injury, unexplained hypotension, and signicant bone injury, i.e., fracture with dislocation or a proximal penetrating wound. These soft signs warrant evaluation of the arterial tree. See Table33.3.
Key Point
Six P’s of distal ischemia (same for acute aortic
occlusion and peripheral arterial disease):
• Pain
• Pallor
• Paresthesia
• Poikilothermia
• Pulselessness
• Paralysis
Table 33.2 Gustilo classication system of extremity fractures
Type Wound length Soft tissue damage Fracture pattern Soft tissue coverage Vasculature 1 <1cm Minimal soft tissue damage Simple Adequate soft tissue coverage Intact 2 >1cm Moderate soft tissue damage,
3A >10cm Extensive soft tissue damage, 3B Inadequate soft tissue coverage 3C Arterial damage
contamination, or comminution
contamination, or comminution; segmental fracture
Moderate comminution Adequate soft tissue coverage Intact
Severe comminution or segmental fractures
Adequate soft tissue coverage Intact
requiring ap coverage
33 Pelvic andExtremity Trauma
373
Further evaluation including plain lms, bedside ultrasound, and CT scan can help identify internal injuries (Fig. 33.1a). Ultrasound and Doppler evaluations including the calculation of the ABI are very useful bedside evaluations. Multi-slice CT evaluation through the pelvis should evaluate for hematoma, fractures, and concurrent injuries to the bowel and bladder which can guide selective angiography [12]. CT evaluation of the extremities can better characterize a fracture as well as neurovascular involvement to aid in orthopedic and angio­graphic planning. Contrast extravasation indicates an area of active bleeding, while failure of distal vasculature to enhance is evidence of distal ischemia. Patients with coagulopathy should be reversed prior to performing angiography.
Key Point
Contrast extravasation on CT corresponds to an area of
active bleeding.

Conventional Therapy

Once the decision is made to take the patient to the operating room, the entire limb is sterilely prepared. Prior to investigating the site of the injury, proximal and distal control of the extremity arteries is obtained. Separate incisions proximal
Table 33.3 Signs of vascular injury
Hard signs Soft signs Active bleeding Non-expanding hematoma Expanding pulsatile
hematoma Bruit/thrill over wound History of severe bleeding at time of
Absent distal pulses Unexplained hypotension Distal ischemic changes Signicant bone injury
Peripheral neurological decit
incident
and distal are utilized to isolate the vessel. Vessel slings are passed around the vessel twice to allow for control of the blood ow. Identication of the injured vessel can then be undertaken. The inow (aortoiliac arteries) and outow (infrainguinal arteries) can be evaluated. In cases where there is limited inow or outow due to thrombus, a Fogarty catheter can be passed to remove thrombi adjacent to the vessel injury. If a small, clean partial circumference lacera­tion is identied, it can be repaired by directly suturing or by the application of a small vein patch. If the vessel is tran­sected, the cut ends tend to retract. If possible, the arterial ends are mobilized, and an end-to-end repair is attempted. If vessel approximation is not possible, a synthetic graft or reverse vein graft can be employed.
Key Point
Surgical treatment options for vessel injury:
• Fogarty catheter to remove thrombus
• Primary surgical repair
• Small vein patch
• Re-anastomosis of transection
• Synthetic or reverse vein graft
• Ligation or shunting with delayed denitive repair
In some cases, the concept of damage control surgery is more appropriate [13, 14]. Damage control surgery posits that a minimal surgery now can temporize the patient in a more expedient way and allow for faster time to complete resuscitation. This can then be followed by more denitive surgical repair later when the patient is stabilized and can tolerate a longer procedure. When this concept is applied to extremity vascular trauma, ligation of active bleeding arter­ies and shunting is performed immediately with formal repair performed at a later date. Ligation of the common and external carotid artery, subclavian axillary, and internal iliac
Fig. 33.1 (a) Right pelvic trauma with active extravasation from the
superior gluteal (arrowhead) and inferior gluteal (arrow) artery injuries. (b) Selective catheterization of the inferior gluteal artery followed by coil embolization (not shown). (c) Selective catheterization with coil
embolization of the superior gluteal artery. (d) Completion angiogram following coil embolization of the inferior and superior gluteal artery injuries shows no evidence of active extravasation
374
H. M. Richard
arteries is considered safe. Ligation of the internal carotid artery is associated with a 10–20% stroke rate. Ligation of the external iliac, common femoral, or supercial femoral arteries can result in critical limb ischemia. For these reasons, shunting is required prior to ligation of these vessels to prevent limb loss or stroke. Extra anatomic shunts allow elective fracture repair and delayed vascular reconstruction.
Another concern of operative management is compart­ment syndrome. Ischemia followed by local inammatory response can lead to edema and reperfusion injury during revascularization which can increase the compartment pres­sure. When compartment pressures rises to greater than 30mmHg, this can result in venous and capillary compres­sion. This may result in vascular stasis, cellular ischemia, and ultimately cell death. Whenever the possibility of compart­ment syndrome is identied, it can be treated with surgical fasciotomy. If a fasciotomy is not performed, then compart­ment pressures should be monitored.
Key Point
It is critical to monitor compartment pressures or per-
form fasciotomies in those at risk for compartment
syndrome following revascularization. There are four
compartments of the calf, three of the thigh, and two of
the upper arm and forearm.

Interventional Therapy

Angiography is frequently employed for treatment of bleed­ing following pelvic or extremity trauma. The development of catheter-based angiography dates back to the 1950s [15, 16].
Not long after the development of angiography for the treatment of peripheral arterial disease, Dr. Ring experi­mented with the rst treatment of pelvic hemorrhage in
1972. Initially, infusions of epinephrine or autologous blood clot were utilized for active bleeding [17]. Treatment for vas­cular occlusion came about later when angioplasty balloons and stents were developed for the treatment of arterial dis­sections. IR techniques have developed in tandem with the development of the tools of the trades (refer to Chap. 4 for a thorough discussion of IR instruments). Numerous different catheters and wires have been developed to aid the interven­tional radiologist in accessing various vessels.
Embolization agents vary from temporary to permanent [18]. An example of a temporary agent is Gelfoam, which can be administered as a slurry or as pledgets. Permanent agent includes coils, vascular plugs, or even covered stents. Gelfoam is most appropriate in embolizing the pelvis where there may be multiple foci of bleeding. As Gelfoam acts as a liquid embolic, it can diffuse into multiple areas of bleeding. Gelfoam is metabolized by the body and allows for recanali­zation of the embolized vessels in approximately 2weeks. Permanent agents such as coils or vascular plugs are appro­priate for a focal injury or vessel truncation. For dominant vessels that require distal perfusion, a covered stent can be used to cover the area of injury. Stent grafts can be placed to cover a “hole” in a vessel and maintain a patent lumen (Fig.33.2) [19].
Indication and timing of pelvic angiography is based on hemodynamic instability and failure to respond to uid resuscitation. Patients with a very large transfusion require­ment or persistent hypotension, who have evidence of ongo­ing pelvic arterial bleeding, will benet from arteriography and embolization. Pelvic arterial bleeding may be suspected following exploratory laparotomy for abdominal organ inju­ries; if suspected, the pelvis is surgically packed. The retro-
Fig. 33.2 (a) Left femoral artery to femoral vein stula (arrow). (b) Fluency stent graft (Bard Peripheral Vascular) was deployed to repair the
stula
33 Pelvic andExtremity Trauma
375
peritoneum should not be opened surgically as doing so may release the tamponade and the patient could decompen­sate. Signs of active bleeding include ongoing hypoten­sion, expanding pelvic hematoma, or a large amount of bright red blood returned from operative placed pelvic sur­gical drains.
Indication and timing for extremity angiography is usu­ally based on evidence of active bleeding or loss of distal perfusion [20, 21]. Hard signs of vascular injury dictate the need for immediate operative repair, while soft signs, evi­dence of bleeding following operative repair, or worsening exam may necessitate an extremity angiogram. Pelvic angi­ography and embolization has 85–97% success in control­ling pelvic bleeding [1, 22, 23]; 5–23% of patients may require repeat angiography. Angiography and embolization is 84–97% successful in controlling extremity bleeding [11, 24].
Following angiographic treatment of an area of injury, serial hematocrit can be used to conrm resolution of bleed­ing. If the H&H continues to downtrend, further angiographic evaluation may be warranted. Frequent evaluation of distal pulses should be performed to ensure adequate perfusion. The arterial index should return to greater than 1.0 in patients without chronic peripheral artery disease. Vigilant examina­tion for compartment syndrome should be performed, partic­ularly in patients with signicant ischemic time. If there is clinical suspicion for compartment syndrome, then compart­ment pressure should be measured with potential fasciotomy creation (Fig.33.3).
Preoperative evaluation of patients prior to pelvic and extremity angiography will be based on the review of avail­able imaging. The location of the suspected sight of bleed­ing will weigh heavily on the plan for accessing the vascular anatomy.
Fig. 33.3 (a) CT of the left leg demonstrates pseudoaneurysm (arrow-
head) secondary to gunshot wound. The bleed is arising from the pro­funda femoral artery (arrow). Note the extensive femoral fracture that was repaired. (b) Coronal reformatted images demonstrate profunda femoral artery (arrow) and pseudoaneurysm (arrowhead). (c)
Angiography demonstrates active bleeding from the profunda femoral artery. The catheter tip (arrow) is at the distal aspect of the pseudoaneu­rysm. Note the bullet fragment (arrowhead). (d) Angiography after dis­tal embolization. Note the coil nest (arrow). (e) Angiography after proximal coil embolization
376
The How To
1. Review imaging and determine areas to be studied based on expected location of arterial injury.
2. For pelvic and extremity vascular injury, the femo­ral artery should be accessed via the Seldinger tech­nique. Bilateral femoral access may be needed in patients with several suspected sites of bleeding. Radial artery access can be considered on a case­by-case basis.
3. be performed to identify arterial injuries such as active extravasation, vessel truncation, or arteriove-
4. made how to treat the lesion. This may include embolization using temporary or permanent agents or stent placement depending on the type of injury. (a) When there are multiple foci of active bleeding
or vessel injury, this may require a diffuse agent such as Gelfoam slurry.
(b)
coils may be employed.
(c) As there are multiple collateral pathways in the
pelvis, it is also possible that a collateral artery is supplying the injured vessel and continuing to allow the patient to bleed.
(d) Caution is warranted when using Gelfoam in
the extremity to prevent distal embolization.
(e)
important to embolize distal and proximal to the lesion for control.
5.
adequacy of the treatment.
Angiography and embolization in the pelvis and extremi­ties is safe and effective for pelvic and extremity trauma. CT angiography is the diagnostic modality of choice in evaluating patients prior to angiography. Angiography and embolization can be performed as an adjunct to patients with ongoing bleed­ing after surgery for pelvic and extremity trauma.

References

1. Coccolini F, Stahel PF, Montori G, Bif W, Horer TM, Catena F,
et al. Pelvic trauma: WSES classication and guidelines. World JEmerg Surg. 2017;12:5.
2. Cullinane DC, Schiller HJ, Zielinski MD, Bilaniuk JW, Collier
BR, Como J, etal. Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma
H. M. Richard
practice management guidelines for hemorrhage in pelvic fracture– update and systematic review. JTrauma. 2011;71(6):1850–68.
3. Alton TB, Gee AO. Classications in brief: young and bur­gess classication of pelvic ring injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(8):2338–42.
4. Alton TB, Gee AO. Classications in brief: letournel classication for acetabular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(1):35–8.
5. Halawi MJ.Pelvic ring injuries: emergency assessment and man­agement. JClin Orthop Trauma. 2015;6(4):252–8.
6. Hussami M, Grabherr S, Meuli RA, Schmidt S. Severe pelvic injury: vascular lesions detected by ante- and post-mortem contrast medium-enhanced CT and associations with pelvic fractures. Int JLegal Med. 2017;131(3):731–8.
7. Karadimas EJ, Nicolson T, Kakagia DD, Matthews SJ, Richards PJ, Giannoudis PV.Angiographic embolisation of pelvic ring inju­ries. Treatment algorithm and review of the literature. Int Orthop. 2011;35(9):1381–90.
8. Ben-Menachem Y, Coldwell DM, Young JW, Burgess AR. Hemorrhage associated with pelvic fractures: causes, diagnosis, and emergent management. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157(5): 1005–14.
9. Kimbrell BJ, Velmahos GC, Chan LS, Demetriades D.Angiographic embolization for pelvic fractures in older patients. Arch Surg. 2004;139(7):728–32; discussion 32–3.
10. Kim PH, Leopold SS. In brief: Gustilo-Anderson classication. [Corrected]. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(11):3270–4.
11. Fox N, Rajani RR, Bokhari F, Chiu WC, Kerwin A, Seamon MJ, etal. Evaluation and management of penetrating lower extremity arterial trauma: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(5 Suppl 4):S315–20.
12. Juern JS, Milia D, Codner P, Beckman M, Somberg L, Webb T, etal. Clinical signicance of computed tomography contrast extravasa­tion in blunt trauma patients with a pelvic fracture. JTrauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;82(1):138–40.
13. Roberts DJ, Bobrovitz N, Zygun DA, Ball CG, Kirkpatrick AW, Faris PD, etal. Indications for use of thoracic, abdominal, pelvic, and vascular damage control interventions in trauma patients: a content analysis and expert appropriateness rating study. JTrauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79(4):568–79.
14. Walker ML.The damage control laparotomy. J Natl Med Assoc. 1995;87(2):119–22.
15. Kerr WS Jr, Margolies MN, Ring EJ, Waltman AC, Baum SN. Arteriography in pelvic fractures with massive hemorrhage. Trans Am Assoc Genitourin Surg. 1972;64:14–7.
16. Margolies MN, Ring EJ, Waltman AC, Kerr WS Jr, Baum S. Arteriography in the management of hemorrhage from pelvic fractures. N Engl JMed. 1972;287(7):317–21.
17. Ayella RJ, RW DP Jr, Khaneja SC, Maekawa K, Soderstrom CA, Rodriguez A, etal. Transcatheter embolization of autologous clot in the management of bleeding associated with fractures of the pelvis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1978;147(6):849–52.
18. Scemama U, Dabadie A, Varoquaux A, Soussan J, Gaudon C, Louis G, et al. Pelvic trauma and vascular emergencies. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2015;96(7–8):717–29.
19. Kufner S, Cassese S, Groha P, Byrne RA, Schunkert H, Kastrati A, et al. Covered stents for endovascular repair of iatrogenic injuries of iliac and femoral arteries. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015;16(3):156–62.
20. Abrassart S, Stern R, Peter R. Unstable pelvic ring injury with hemodynamic instability: what seems the best procedure choice and sequence in the initial management? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(2):175–82.
21. Marzi I, Lustenberger T.Management of bleeding pelvic fractures. Scand JSurg. 2014;103(2):104–11.
33 Pelvic andExtremity Trauma
377
22. Ierardi AM, Duka E, Lucchina N, Floridi C, De Martino A, Donat D, et al. The role of interventional radiology in abdominopelvic trauma. Br JRadiol. 2016;89(1061):20150866.
23. Shi J, Gomes A, Lee E, Kee S, Moriarty J, Cryer H, et al. Complications after transcatheter arterial embolization for pelvic trauma: relationship to level and laterality of embolization. Eur JOrthop Surg Traumatol. 2016;26(8):877–83.
24. DuBose JJ, Savage SA, Fabian TC, Menaker J, Scalea T, Holcomb JB, etal. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma PROspective Observational Vascular Injury Treatment (PROOVIT) registry: multicenter data on modern vascular injury diagnosis, management, and outcomes. JTrauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(2):215–22; discussion 22–3.