Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3657_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
49 Мб
Скачать
324
T. C. Huber et al.
Prostate Cancer/Hematuria
Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers to affect men worldwide with an estimated 1.6 million cases and 360,000 deaths annually [11]. Prostate artery embolization is not approved for the treatment of prostate cancer. However, prostate carcinoma can be associated with hemorrhage, both spontaneous and after treatment. Prostate artery emboliza­tion for control of hematuria associated with prostate carci­noma was rst described in the 1970s using Gelfoam as an embolic agent, typically administered in the anterior division of the internal iliac artery without selection of prostatic branches [12]. Today, the armamentarium for embolization for prostate cancer hemorrhage includes particles (such as polyvinyl alcohol or PVA particles). The advent of micro­catheters and microwires has allowed the reduction in the risk of nontarget embolization to other branches of the ante­rior division.

Clinical Indication

The initial evaluation of a patient with BPH is intended to assess the severity of the patient’s LUTS, which can be quan­tied using the metrics dened in Table29.2. A digital rectal exam, urinalysis, and serum prostate-specic antigen (PSA) should be performed [14]. It should be noted, however, that as of 2012, the US Preventive Services Task Force recom­mends against PSA screening for prostate cancer [15]. If the initial evaluation is concerning for prostate cancer or intrin­sic bladder dysfunction, the patient should be referred to an urologist prior to intervention, if not already being followed by one.
For patients with LUTS and evidence of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), who have failed medical therapy and are
signicantly distressed by their symptoms, interventional therapies are an option. The type of intervention varies depending on the experience and resources of the treating interventionalist.
Pre-procedural imaging may include MRI or CTA. Multiparametric MRI may demonstrate a diffusely enlarged central zone or discrete BPH nodules (see Fig.29.2) [9]; however, MRI is not routinely used in the evaluation of BPH.MRI plays a larger role in the evaluation of prostatic carcinoma. CTA may be obtained prior to PAE to better dene the highly variable pelvic vascular anatomy (Figs.29.3 and 29.4) [13, 16].
The internal iliac artery can terminate in four distinct branching patterns (Fig.29.5) [17]. The prostatic artery can be single or multiple, with up to three branches supplying the prostate gland on each side; it can arise from the inferior vesi­cal artery, internal pudendal artery, umbilical artery, obturator artery, inferior gluteal artery, or internal iliac artery [16].
Embolization of the pelvic vessels can additionally be used to treat hematuria related to bladder or prostate carci­noma [18]. Patients with radiation cystitis, chemotherapy­induced cystitis, or advanced prostate cancer can develop persistent hematuria, which can be a signicant source of morbidity [19]. In such cases, embolization with a variety of embolic agents including Gelfoam, coils, or polyvinyl alco­hol (PVA) may be performed to tamponade bleeding [12, 19].
Table 29.2 Key elements of the evaluation of LUTS prior to PAE [13]
Denitions IPSS International prostate symptom score. Seven symptom-
related questions and one quality-of-life question QOL Quality of life score. Questionnaires exist to try to quantify IIEF International index of erectile function. Questionnaire used
to assess erectile dysfunction PV Prostate volume (<30cc is normal) PSA Prostate-specic antigen (normal range<4ng/ml) Qmax Peak urinary ow rate. 12–15ml/s suggests bladder outlet
obstruction
Fig. 29.2 Post-contrast T1 magnetic resonance image of the prostate
after successful bilateral prostate embolization. The non-enhancing infarcted central gland (white arrowhead) can be seen, surrounded by enhancing capsular tissue (white arrow)
29 Prostate Artery Embolization
Fig. 29.3 Internal iliac artery anatomy, type A branching pattern. CT
angiogram of the pelvis. Superior gluteal artery (white arrowhead) con­stituting the posterior division of the internal iliac artery. The inferior gluteal artery (black arrowhead) arises from the anterior division, as the gluteo-pudendal trunk, which branches into the inferior gluteal artery, the internal pudendal artery (black arrow)

Conventional Therapy

Medical therapy is indicated for patients with mild to moder­ate LUTS.Since the 1980s, the mainstay of therapy has been two classes of drugs, 5-α-reductase inhibitors and α-1 block­ing agents [20]. 5-α-Reductase inhibitors (e.g., nasteride) block the conversion of testosterone to DHT, a more potent androgen. Selective α-1 blockers (e.g., doxazosin and terazo­sin) block the binding of norepinephrine and result in decreased smooth muscle tone, which can improve LUTS.The α-1 blocking agents are typically started as rst­line therapy for LUTS, while 5-α-reductase inhibitors are more effective at treating symptoms caused by enlarged prostates [20]. The combination of these two therapies has been shown to be effective at reducing the progression of LUTS, especially for men with high baseline PSA [21].
Surgical and interventional therapies are reserved for
patients with moderate to severe LUTS or those who have
325
Fig. 29.4 Internal iliac artery anatomy, type A branching pattern.
Digital subtraction angiogram after injection of the left internal iliac artery. Superior gluteal artery (white arrowhead) constituting the poste­rior division of the internal iliac artery. The inferior gluteal artery (black arrowhead) arises from the anterior division, as the gluteo-pudendal trunk, which branches into the inferior gluteal artery, the internal puden­dal artery (black arrow), and the superior vesical artery (white arrow)
failed medical therapy. Several different surgical options are available for the treatment of BPH [14]. Transurethral resec­tion of the prostate (TURP) remains the gold standard for treatment of BPH [1]. This technique utilizes a resectoscope with a cautery loop to surgically resect and aspirate tissue via retrograde urethral access. TURP has the potential complica­tion of hemorrhage, and PAE may be performed in the set­ting of post-TURP hemorrhage. Open surgical resection is reserved for patients with prostates greater than 100g or with anatomy precluding transurethral approach. Other methods include laser prostatectomy, transurethral incision of the prostate, transurethral microwave therapy, and transurethral needle ablation [14].
326
AT
Inferior
Inferior
Superior
iliac artery
iliac artery
gluteal artery
gluteal artery
Superior
Type C
Type D
T. C. Huber et al.
Internal
Anterior
division
gluteal artery
AP AP
Type
Superior
gluteal artery
gluteal artery
Internal
pudendal artery
Inferior
gluteal artery
Internal iliac
artery
Anterior
division
gluteal artery
ype B
gluteal artery
Internal
pudendal artery
AP AP
Internal
Internal
pudendal artery
Fig. 29.5 Branching patterns described by Yamaki etal. [17]

Interventional Therapy

Prostatic artery embolization was originally used for treatment of hematuria of prostatic origin. Post-procedurally it was noted that the prostatic volume was reduced [22]. This gave rise to the idea that BPH could be treated with transcatheter embolization.
Subsequent studies have demonstrated that prostate vol-
ume can be reduced with embolization of the prostatic ves-
Internal iliac artery
Superior
Inferior
Anterior division
Internal pudendal artery
sels, with resultant improvement in LUTS. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated statistically signicant reduc­tions in prostate volume and post-void residual volume, sig­nicant increase in maximum urinary ow rate, and no change in erectile function at 12months post-embolization [23]. These ndings are supported by similar earlier analy­ses [24, 25], indicating that PAE is an effective means of treating LUTS.
Prostatic artery:
Superior vesical
29 Prostate Artery Embolization
The How To
Prior to the procedure, imaging with CTA or MRA is performed to evaluate anatomy and prostate volume as described above. Procedural steps are as follows:
1. Access is obtained via the common femoral artery or radial artery using the Seldinger technique. This may be either unilateral or bilateral, although a unilateral approach is more commonly used.
2. A pelvic angiogram may be performed, although this is not necessary if a pre-procedure CTA has been obtained.
3. A 5F catheter is advanced through a vascular sheath. The catheter is used to select the contralateral inter­nal iliac artery and then the prostatovesical artery. A pre- procedure CTA can aid in delineating com­plex anatomical variants. A 2.7F microcatheter (or smaller) is then used to select the main trunk giving rise to the individual prostatic vessels
29.6 and 29.7).
4. Cone beam CT scans can be obtained during the procedure in most modern angiography sites allow­ing precise characterization of the tissue being embolized.
5.
an embolic agent such as PVA or microspheres is injected until stasis.
6. The previously described method is then repeated
on the side ipsilateral to the access, if only one vas­cular access was obtained.
327
Fig. 29.6 Digital subtraction angiogram of the left prostaticovesicular
artery after embolization. There is absence of lling in the distal branches, with lling of the more proximal vesicular branches supply­ing the bladder (black arrow). Prostatic parenchymal contrast staining related to prior injections is seen
PAE can be performed in the outpatient setting, though some centers prefer that patients be admitted overnight for observation. Intravenous antibiotics are continued for 1 week post-procedurally, and nonsteroidal anti-inam­matory medications can be used for pain control. Other medications including phenazopyridine and belladonna­opium suppositories can help control bladder spasms and pelvic discomfort. Routine followup should be performed at 1 and 6 months, at a minimum. This should include assessment of symptoms with IPSS, QoL, and IIEF. While complications following PAE are uncommon, they can occur with rectalgia and dysuria being the most common (Table 29.3).
Internal iliac
artery
artery
Prostatovesical
artery
Inferior vesical
artery
Fig. 29.7 Pelvic vascular anatomy
Urinary bladder
Seminal vesicle
Prostate gland
Anterior branch posterolateral branch
328
T. C. Huber et al.
Table 29.3 Most common complications after PAE [23]
Rectalgia or dysuria 10% Transient acute urinary retention 8% Transient hematuria 4% Hematospermia 4% Mild UTI 3%
UTI Urinary tract infection

References

1. Edwards JL.Diagnosis and management of benign prostatic hyper-
plasia. Am Fam Physician. 2008;77(10):1403–10.
2. Carson C III, Rittmaster R. The role of dihydrotestosterone in
benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology. 2003;61(4, Supplement
1):2–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00045-1.
3. Wilson JD, Roehrborn C.Long-term consequences of castration in
men: lessons from the Skoptzy and the eunuchs of the Chinese and Ottoman courts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(12):4324–31.
https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.84.12.6206.
4. Berry SJ, Coffey DS, Walsh PC, Ewing LL. The develop-
ment of human benign prostatic hyperplasia with age. J Urol. 1984;132(3):474–9.
5. Sarma AV, Wei JT.Benign prostatic hyperplasia and lower urinary
tract symptoms. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(3):248–57. https://doi.
org/10.1056/NEJMcp1106637.
6. Roehrborn CG. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: an overview. Rev
Urol. 2005;7(Suppl 9):S3–S14.
7. Rosen R, Altwein J, Boyle P, Kirby RS, Lukacs B, Meuleman E,
etal. Lower urinary tract symptoms and male sexual dysfunction: the multinational survey of the aging male (MSAM-7). Eur Urol. 2003;44(6):637–49.
8. McNeal JE. The zonal anatomy of the prostate. Prostate.
1981;2(1):35–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.2990020105.
9. Guneyli S, Ward E, Thomas S, Yousuf AN, Trilisky I, Peng Y, etal.
Magnetic resonance imaging of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2016;22(3):215–9.
10. Verma S, Rajesh A.A clinically relevant approach to imaging pros-
tate cancer: review. Am JRoentgenol. 2011;196(3_supplement):S1– S10. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.7196.
11. Fitzmaurice C, Allen C, Barber RM, Barregard L, Bhutta ZA,
Brenner H, etal. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability­adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015: a system­atic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:524–48. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688.
12. Bischoff W, Goerttler U.Successful intra-arterial embolization of
bleeding carcinoma of the prostate. UrologeAusg A. 1977;16(2): 99–102.
13. Bilhim T, Pereira JA, Fernandes L, Tinto HR, Pisco JM. Angiographic anatomy of the male pelvic arteries. Am JRoentgenol. 2014;203(4):W373–82. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.11687.
14. McVary KT, Roehrborn CG, Avins AL, Barry MJ, Bruskewitz RC, Donnell RF, etal. Update on AUA guideline on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2011;185(5):1793–803.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.01.074.
15. Moyer VA. Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(2):120. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-
201207170-00459.
16. Bilhim T, Tinto HR, Fernandes L, Pisco JM.Radiological anatomy of prostatic arteries. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;15(4):276–85.
https://doi.org/10.1053/j.tvir.2012.09.006.
17. Yamaki K-I, Saga T, Doi Y, Aida K, Yoshizuka M.A statistical study of the branching of the human internal iliac artery. Kurume Med J.1998;45(4):333–40. https://doi.org/10.2739/kurumemedj.45.333.
18. Golzarian J, Antunes AA, Bilhim T, Carnevale FC, Konety B, McVary KT, et al. Prostatic artery embolization to treat lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia and bleeding in patients with prostate cancer: proceedings from a Multidisciplinary Research Consensus Panel. JVasc Interv Radiol. 2014;25(5):665–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2013.11.003.
19. Loffroy R, Pottecher P, Cherblanc V, Favelier S, Estivalet L, Koutlidis N, etal. Current role of transcatheter arterial emboliza­tion for bladder and prostate hemorrhage. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2014;95(11):1027–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2014.03.008.
20. Lepor H. Medical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Rev Urol. 2011;13(1):20–33.
21. McConnell JD, Roehrborn CG, Bautista OM, Andriole GL Jr, Dixon CM, Kusek JW, et al. The long-term effect of doxazosin, nasteride, and combination therapy on the clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia. N Engl JMed. 2003;349(25):2387–
98. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa030656.
22. DeMeritt JS, Elmasri FF, Esposito MP, Rosenberg GS. Relief of benign prostatic hyperplasia-related bladder outlet obstruc­tion after transarterial polyvinyl alcohol prostate embolization. JVasc Interv Radiol. 2000;11(6):767–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/
S1051-0443(07)61638-8.
23. Uacker A, Haskal ZJ, Bilhim T, Patrie J, Huber T, Pisco JM.Meta­analysis of prostatic artery embolization for benign prostatic hyper­plasia. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(11):1686–1697.e8. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2016.08.004.
24. Kuang M, Vu A, Athreya S. A meta-analysis of prostatic artery embolization in the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(3):S53. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jvir.2015.12.147.
25. Cizman Z, Isaacson A, Burke C. Short- to midterm safety and efcacy of prostatic artery embolization: a systematic review. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(10):1487–1493.e1. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jvir.2016.04.015.
Part VII
Lower Extremity Interventions

Aortoiliac Disease

AlokB.Bhatt andJamesF.Benenati

Pathophysiology

The worldwide prevalence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) is estimated at between 3 and 12 percent with nearly 202 million people around the world and 10 million in the USA alone affected [1]. The incidence of PAD is rising, and as the US population continues to age, the incidence of PAD will continue to rise. Its clinical importance is not only related to the symptoms it causes but also because it is a coronary artery disease (CAD) equivalent. Even asymptom­atic patients with PAD have a signicantly increased risk of cardiovascular events like myocardial infarction and stroke [2]. Similar to CAD, its risk factors include smoking, age, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, male gender, diabetes mellitus, obesity, family history, and physi­cal inactivity. As is expected, the morbidity and mortality in patients with PAD are often due to cardiac disease and stroke.
Peripheral arterial disease can be broadly compartmental­ized into aortoiliac disease, also known as “inow” disease, and infrainguinal disease, or “outow” disease. Infrainguinal disease refers to the common femoral and more peripheral arteries of the lower extremities. In general, the clinical severity of peripheral arterial disease can be assessed by the Rutherford classication, which straties patients into six categories (Table30.1). Inow disease may involve isolated segments or a combination of the abdominal aorta, common iliac, external iliac, and internal iliac (hypogastric) arteries. In general, patients with aortoiliac disease have a worse prognosis than patients with infrainguinal disease with respect to cardiovascular events such as MI and stroke as well as overall mortality [3].
The presentation of aortoiliac occlusive disease varies depending on severity of stenosis, distribution of disease, and
A. B. Bhatt • J. F. Benenati (*) Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Baptist Hospital of Miami, Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami, FL, USA e-mail: JamesB@baptisthealth.net
30
Table 30.1 Rutherford classication. Grades 0 and I refer to asymp-
tomatic patients and claudicants, respectively. Grade II and III refers to patients that have critical limb ischemia. The Rutherford category fur­ther subcategorizes patients by the severity of their claudication or criti­cal limb ischemia
Grade Category Clinical Objective criteria 0 0 Asymptomatic Normal treadmill or reactive
I 1 Mild
claudication
I 2 Moderate
claudication
I 3 Severe
claudication
II 4 Ischemic rest
pain
III 5 Minor tissue
loss
III 6 Major tissue
loss
the presence of other sites of disease such as concurrent infrainguinal disease. Commonly, patients with inow dis­ease present with chronic symptoms. A classic presentation is intermittent claudication in which patients describe pain as cramping, which worsens with activity and is quickly relieved with rest. In this setting, symptoms are often located in the buttock or thigh (Table30.2). Although intermittent claudica­tion is the “classic” symptom of inow disease, patients will also commonly present with “atypical” leg pain including vague leg achiness, heaviness, and joint pain among other symptoms. It is important to remember that patients with PAD often have other comorbid conditions such as arthritis, peripheral neuropathy, and concurrent venous disease which may confound the diagnosis. In 1 study of 460 PAD patients, only about 40% of patients with PAD presented with classic claudication [4]. For this reason, the threshold to evaluate a
hyperemia test Completes treadmill test; AP after exercise >50mmHg but at least 20mmHg lower than resting value Between categories 1 and 3
Cannot complete standard treadmill exercise, and AP after exercise <50mmHg Resting AP <40mmHg, at or barely pulsatile ankle or metatarsal PVR; TP<30mmHg Resting AP <60mmHg, ankle or metatarsal PVR at or barely pulsatile; TP<40mmHg Same as category 5
© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 N. A. Keefe et al. (eds.), IR Playbook, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71300-7_30
331
332
A. B. Bhatt and J. F. Benenati
Table 30.2 Localization of diseased vessel based on symptomology
Location of symptoms Diseased artery Hip/buttock
claudication Impotence Aorta, bilateral common iliac, bilateral
Thigh claudication Aortoiliac, common femoral Calf claudication Aortoiliac, supercial femoral, popliteal
Table 30.3 Ankle-brachial index
>1.3 Non-compressible
0.9–1.3 Normal
0.4–0.9 Mild to moderate PAD <0.4 Severe PAD
Aorta, common iliac, internal iliac
internal iliac
patient for PAD should be low, even if the symptoms are not completely typical. First-line evaluation includes obtaining an ankle-brachial index (ABI) which is a measure of lower extremity arterial stenosis (Table30.3).
Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is another manifestation of peripheral arterial disease and refers to chronically and severely diminished blood ow to an extremity with an ABI less than
0.4. These patients are Rutherford class 4–6 and typically have multi-segment disease, meaning there is usually a combination of aortoiliac, femoral, popliteal, and tibial arterial disease. CLI patients have high morbidity and mortality related to their vas­cular disease. One meta-analysis found that during a median follow-up of 12months, all- cause mortality in CLI patients was 22%, and major amputation rate was 22% [5].
Acute aortoiliac occlusive disease is usually the result of embolization from a central source such as the heart, more proximal aortic plaque, or in situ thrombosis due to plaque rupture. Symptoms related to acute occlusions vary based on which segment of artery is affected and can range from acute limb ischemia with profound motor and sensory decits to renal failure, rhabdomyolysis, limb loss, and death [6].
Blue Toe Syndrome
“Blue toe” syndrome refers to ischemic changes within a digit due to microembolism from more central atheroscle­rotic disease. Although the source of the cholesterol embolus may be anywhere within the arterial tree, it will often arise from plaque within the aorta or iliac arteries. Emboli from the iliac arteries result in unilateral symptoms, whereas emboli from the aorta may be unilateral or bilateral.
the classic triad of buttock claudication, impotence, and absent or diminished femoral pulses.
Fibromuscular Dysplasia
Fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) is a non-atherosclerotic, noninammatory condition that is characterized by abnormal cell development within the arterial wall. Two types of FMD exist: focal and diffuse. The most common is the multifocal type which is associated with the typical “string of pearls” appearance. In FMD, collagen is deposited within the arterial wall resulting in thick bromuscular ridges, which in turn causes luminal stenosis. Its clinical manifestations are varied, and patients with FMD may present with dissection, distal embolism, lifestyle-limiting claudication, or occlusion [7].

Clinical Indication

As previously mentioned, patients with chronic aortoiliac occlusive disease classically present with symptoms of claudication, distal embolization, or critical limb ischemia (rest pain or non-healing wounds). Even in the absence of classic symptoms, in patients with leg pain, there should be a low threshold to evaluate for PAD.
In addition to performing a good history and physical exam, the best initial steps for evaluating a patient for PAD are with duplex sonography, ankle-brachial index (ABI), and pulse volume recordings. The ABI is an excellent way to detect the presence of PAD as well as determine its severity (see Table 30.3). Used in conjunction with pulse volume recordings and duplex sonography, the segment of arterial dis­ease and physiologic signicance of a particular lesion can be ascertained (Fig.30.1). Once a noninvasive evaluation is com­pleted, CT and MR angiography can help better delineate important anatomic details prior to proceeding with an inter­vention. Although both CT and MRI provide valuable infor­mation, CT may be more useful in evaluating aortoiliac disease because it has better spatial resolution than MRI.MRI can be more valuable in evaluating tibial disease than CT as CT eval­uation of small vessels is limited by arterial calcications.
CT and MR have largely replaced the need for diagnostic arteriography because in aggregate, noninvasive tests can typically delineate exact location of disease, physiologic signicance, and anatomic information required to plan treatment.
Leriche Syndrome
Leriche syndrome is characterized by occlusion of the infra­renal abdominal aorta and both common iliac arteries. It is typically related to a chronic occlusion and manifests with

Conventional Therapy

Treatment of patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease varies based on symptomology, comorbidities, and anatomic distribution of disease. For patients that present with
30 Aortoiliac Disease
333
Fig. 30.1 (a) Patient with a normal ABI and normal pulse volume
recordings suggesting no signicant arterial occlusive disease. If asymmetrically dampening of the high-thigh waveforms was seen, this would suggest ipsilateral inow disease. If inow disease is sus­pected by segmental pressures or pulse volume recordings, then the
common femoral arterial (CFA) Doppler ultrasound waveform should be reviewed for a monophasic waveform suggesting hemody­namically signicant inow disease. (b) Normal triphasic left CFA waveform. (c) Monophasic right CFA waveform suggests iliac steno­sis or occlusion
334
A. B. Bhatt and J. F. Benenati
Fig. 30.1 (continued)
intermittent claudication, they may initially be managed with conservative therapy. Modiable risk factors should be addressed. Smoking cessation programs, strict hemoglobin A1C control, blood pressure management, and statin therapy all play a vital role in medically optimizing patients with PAD. Exercise programs are a mainstay of therapy, and in fact, supervised exercise training programs improve both morbidity and mortality in PAD [2]. Revascularization procedures combined with a supervised exercise program lead to better outcomes than each do individually [2].
Medications may also help relieve symptoms. Cilostazol is an oral phosphodiesterase 3 inhibitor that promotes blood ow and has been shown to increase walking distance in claudicants [8].
Ever since Charles Dotter rst described angioplasty in 1964, there has been debate regarding when to treat patients using open surgical versus endovascular tech­niques. For lesions involving the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries, conventional surgical options involve vari­ous types of relatively morbid arterial bypasses. Types of