Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5762_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •1.1 Historical Remarks
- •1.1.1 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound
- •2.2 Machine Settings
- •1.4 CEUS Phases
- •1.8 Three-Dimensional (3D) CEUS
- •1.9 CEUS Guidelines
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2.2 Image Depth Penetration
- •2.2.3 Focus
- •2.2.5 Background Signal (Noise)
- •2.2.6 Dynamic Range
- •2.2.7 Frame Rate
- •2.6 Artifacts
- •2.6.1 Long Liver Enhancement
- •2.7 Safety
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.7 Detection by Intraoperative Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (IO-CEUS)
- •References
- •4: Malignant Liver Tumors
- •4.1 Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- •4.1.1 Introduction
- •4.1.6 Surveillance
- •4.1.7 CEUS LI-RADS
- •4.1.8 Small HCC
- •4.1.9 Treatment Response Follow Up
- •4.1.9.1 Ablation Therapy
- •4.1.9.2 Transarterial Chemoembolization
- •4.1.9.3 Targeted Therapy
- •4.2 Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
- •4.2.2 Imaging
- •4.2.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •4.2.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •4.2.2.3 CT Findings
- •4.2.2.4 MRI Findings
- •4.2.2.5 Other Imaging Findings
- •4.2.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •4.2.3.1 Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- •4.2.4 Pathology
- •4.2.4.1 General Features
- •4.2.5 Clinical Issues
- •4.2.5.1 Presentation
- •4.2.5.2 Prognosis
- •4.2.5.3 Treatment
- •4.3 Liver Metastases
- •4.3.1 Terminology
- •4.3.2 Imaging Features
- •4.3.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •4.3.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •4.3.2.3 CT Findings
- •4.3.2.4 MRI Findings
- •4.3.3.1 Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- •4.3.3.2 Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
- •4.3.3.3 Focal Fatty Liver Change
- •4.4 Dysplasia Nodules
- •4.4.1 Terminology
- •4.4.2 Imaging
- •4.4.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •4.4.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •4.4.2.3 CT Findings
- •4.4.2.4 MRI Findings
- •4.4.2.5 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •4.4.4 Pathology
- •4.4.4.1 General Features
- •4.4.5 Clinical Issues
- •4.4.5.1 Presentation
- •4.4.5.2 Prognosis
- •4.4.5.3 Treatment
- •References
- •5: Benign Liver Tumors
- •5.1 Hepatic Hemangioma
- •5.1.1 Terminology
- •5.1.2 Imaging
- •5.1.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •5.1.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •5.1.2.3 CT Findings
- •5.1.2.4 MRI Findings
- •5.1.2.5 Other Imaging Findings
- •5.1.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •5.1.3.1 Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- •5.1.3.2 Metastatic Hepatic Carcinoma
- •5.1.3.3 Focal Angiosarcoma
- •5.1.3.4 Abscess
- •5.1.3.5 Hepatic Adenoma
- •5.1.4 Pathology
- •5.1.4.1 General Features
- •5.1.5 Clinical Issues
- •5.1.5.1 Presentation
- •5.1.5.2 Prognosis
- •5.1.5.3 Treatment
- •5.2 Focal Nodular Hyperplasia
- •5.2.1 Terminology
- •5.2.2 Imaging
- •5.2.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •5.2.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •5.2.2.3 CT Findings
- •5.2.2.4 MRI Findings
- •5.2.2.5 Other Imaging Findings
- •5.2.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •5.2.3.1 Hepatic Adenoma
- •5.2.3.2 Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- •5.2.3.3 Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- •5.2.4 Pathology
- •5.2.4.1 General Features
- •5.2.5 Clinical Issues
- •5.2.5.1 Prognosis
- •5.2.5.2 Treatment
- •5.3 Hepatocellular Adenoma
- •5.3.1 Terminology
- •5.3.2 Imaging
- •5.3.2.1 Ultrasonographic Findings
- •5.3.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •5.3.2.3 CT Findings
- •5.3.2.4 MRI Findings
- •5.3.2.5 Imaging Recommendations
- •5.3.3.1 Focal Nodular Hyperplasia
- •5.3.3.2 Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- •5.3.3.3 Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- •5.3.3.4 Hepatic Hemangioma
- •5.3.4 Pathology
- •5.3.4.1 General Features
- •5.3.5 Clinical Issues
- •5.3.5.1 Presentation
- •5.3.5.2 Complications
- •5.4.1 Terminology
- •5.4.2 Imaging
- •5.4.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •5.4.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •5.4.2.3 CT Findings
- •5.4.2.4 MRI Findings
- •5.4.2.5 Other Imaging Findings
- •5.4.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •5.4.3.1 Hepatocellular Carcinomas
- •5.4.3.2 Metastases
- •5.4.3.3 Hemangioma
- •5.4.4 Pathology
- •5.4.4.1 General Features
- •5.4.5 Clinical Issues
- •5.4.5.1 Presentation
- •5.4.5.2 Prognosis
- •5.4.5.3 Treatment
- •References
- •6: Rare Malignant Liver Tumors
- •6.1 Hepatic Lymphoma
- •6.1.1 Terminology
- •6.1.2 Imaging
- •6.1.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •6.1.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •6.1.2.3 CT Findings
- •6.1.2.4 MRI Findings
- •6.1.2.5 Other Imaging Findings
- •6.1.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •6.1.4 Pathology
- •6.1.4.1 General Features
- •6.1.5 Clinical Issue
- •6.1.5.1 Presentation
- •6.1.5.2 Prognosis
- •6.1.5.3 Treatment
- •6.2.1 Terminology
- •6.2.2 Imaging
- •6.2.2.1 General Features
- •6.2.2.2 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •6.2.2.3 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •6.2.2.4 CT Findings
- •6.2.2.5 MRI Findings
- •6.2.2.6 Other Imaging Findings
- •6.2.2.7 Imaging Recommendations
- •6.2.4 Pathology
- •6.2.4.1 General Features
- •6.2.5 Clinical Issues
- •6.2.5.1 Presentation
- •6.2.5.2 Prognosis
- •6.2.5.3 Treatment
- •6.3.1 Terminology
- •6.3.2 Imaging
- •6.3.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •6.3.2.3 Computed Tomography Findings
- •6.3.2.4 Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings
- •6.3.2.5 Nuclear Medicine Findings
- •6.3.2.6 Imaging Recommendations
- •6.3.3.1 Focal Nodular Hyperplasia
- •6.3.3.2 Hepatocarcinoma
- •6.3.3.4 Hepatoadenoma
- •6.3.3.5 Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
- •6.3.4 Pathology
- •6.3.4.1 General Features
- •6.3.5 Clinical Issues
- •6.3.5.1 Presentation
- •6.3.5.2 Prognosis
- •6.3.5.3 Treatment
- •6.4 Hepatic Biliary Cystadenocarcinoma
- •6.4.1 Terminology
- •6.4.2 Imaging
- •6.4.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •6.4.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •6.4.2.3 CT Findings
- •6.4.2.4 MRI Findings
- •6.4.2.5 Other Imaging Findings
- •6.4.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •6.4.3.1 Hepatic Biliary Cystadenoma
- •6.4.3.2 Simple Hepatic Cysts
- •6.4.3.3 Hemorrhagic Hepatic Cysts
- •6.4.3.4 Metastatic Tumor
- •6.4.3.5 Hepatic Abscesses
- •6.4.3.6 Hydatid Disease
- •6.4.3.9 Mesenchymal Hamartoma
- •6.4.4 Pathology
- •6.4.4.1 General Features
- •6.4.5 Clinical Issues
- •6.4.5.1 Presentation
- •6.4.5.2 Prognosis
- •6.4.5.3 Treatment
- •6.5 Neuroendocrine Neoplasm
- •6.5.1 Terminology
- •6.5.2 Image
- •6.5.2.1 Ultrasonographic Findings
- •6.5.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •6.5.2.3 CT Findings
- •6.5.2.4 MR Findings
- •6.5.2.5 Other Imaging Finding
- •6.5.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •6.5.3.1 Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- •6.5.3.2 Metastatic Hepatic Carcinoma
- •6.5.4 Pathology
- •6.5.4.1 General Features
- •6.5.5 Clinical Issues
- •6.5.5.1 Presentation
- •6.5.5.2 Prognosis
- •6.5.5.3 Treatment
- •6.6.1 Terminology
- •6.6.2 Imaging
- •6.6.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •6.6.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •6.6.2.3 CT Findings
- •6.6.2.4 MRI Findings
- •6.6.2.5 PET/CT Findings
- •6.6.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •6.6.3.1 Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- •6.6.3.2 Cholangiocarcinoma
- •6.6.3.3 Metastatic Liver Cancer
- •6.6.4 Pathology
- •6.6.5 Clinical Issues
- •References
- •7: Rare Benign Liver Tumors
- •7.1 Hepatic Angiomyolipoma
- •7.1.1 Terminology
- •7.1.2 Imaging
- •7.1.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •7.1.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •7.1.2.3 CT Findings
- •7.1.2.4 MRI Findings
- •7.1.2.5 Other Imaging Findings
- •7.1.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •7.1.4 Pathology
- •7.1.4.1 General Features
- •7.1.5 Clinical Issues
- •7.1.5.1 Presentation
- •7.1.5.2 Prognosis
- •7.1.5.3 Treatment
- •7.2 Hepatic Biliary Cystadenoma
- •7.2.1 Terminology
- •7.2.2 Imaging
- •7.2.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •7.2.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Features
- •7.2.2.3 CT Findings
- •7.2.2.4 MRI Findings
- •7.2.2.5 Other Imaging Findings
- •7.2.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •7.2.3.1 Hepatic Biliary Cystadenocarcinoma
- •7.2.3.2 Simple Hepatic Cyst
- •7.2.3.3 Hemorrhagic Hepatic Cysts
- •7.2.3.4 Metastatic Tumor
- •7.2.3.5 Hepatic Abscesses
- •7.2.3.6 Hydatid Disease
- •7.2.3.9 Mesenchymal Hamartoma
- •7.2.4 Pathology
- •7.2.4.1 General Features
- •7.2.5 Clinical Issues
- •7.2.5.1 Presentation
- •7.2.5.2 Prognosis
- •7.2.5.3 Treatment
- •References
- •8: Hepatic Parasitosis
- •8.1 Terminology
- •8.1.1 Echinococcosis
- •8.1.2 Amebiasis
- •8.1.3 Schistosomiasis
- •8.2 Imaging
- •8.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •8.2.1.1 Echinococcosis
- •8.2.1.2 Amebiasis
- •8.2.1.3 Schistosomiasis
- •8.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •8.2.2.1 Echinococcosis
- •8.2.3 CT Findings
- •8.2.3.1 Echinococcosis
- •8.2.3.2 Amebiasis
- •8.2.3.3 Schistosomiasis
- •8.2.4 MRI Findings
- •8.2.4.1 Echinococcosis
- •8.2.4.2 Amebiasis
- •8.2.4.3 Schistosomiasis
- •8.2.5 Other Imaging Findings
- •8.2.5.1 Echinococcosis
- •8.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •8.2.6.1 Echinococcosis
- •8.2.6.2 Amebiasis
- •8.2.6.3 Schistosomiasis
- •8.3 Pathology
- •8.3.1 General features
- •8.3.1.1 Echinococcosis
- •8.3.1.2 Amebiasis
- •8.3.2.1 Echinococcosis
- •8.4 Clinical Issues
- •8.4.1 Presentation
- •8.4.1.1 Echinococcosis
- •8.4.1.2 Amebic Liver Abscess
- •8.4.1.3 Schistosomiasis
- •8.4.2 Prognosis
- •8.4.2.1 Echinococcosis
- •8.4.2.2 Amebiasis
- •8.4.2.3 Schistosomiasis
- •8.4.3 Treatment
- •8.4.3.1 Echinococcosis
- •8.4.3.2 Amebiasis
- •8.4.3.3 Schistosomiasis
- •References
- •9: Hepatic Inflammatory Pseudotumor
- •9.1 Terminology
- •9.2 Imaging
- •9.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •9.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •9.2.3 CT Findings
- •9.2.4 MRI Findings
- •9.2.5 Other Imaging Findings
- •9.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •9.3.1 Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- •9.3.2 Liver Metastasis Tumor
- •9.3.3 Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
- •9.3.4 Liver Abscess
- •9.4 Pathology
- •9.4.1 General Features
- •9.5 Clinical Issues
- •9.5.1 Presentation
- •9.5.2 Prognosis
- •9.5.3 Treatment
- •References
- •10: Hepatic Artery Aneurysm
- •10.1 Terminology
- •10.2 Hepatic Artery Aneurysm
- •10.3 Imaging
- •10.3.1 General Features
- •10.3.2 Radiographic Findings
- •10.3.3 DSA Findings
- •10.3.4 CT Findings
- •10.3.5 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •10.3.7 MRI Findings
- •10.3.8 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •10.3.9 Protocol Advice
- •10.5 Pathology
- •10.5.1 General Features
- •10.6 Clinical Issues
- •10.6.1 Presentation
- •10.6.2 Prognosis
- •10.6.3 Treatment
- •References
- •11: Peliosis Hepatis
- •11.1 Terminology
- •11.2 Imaging
- •11.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •11.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •11.2.3 CT Findings
- •11.2.4 MRI Findings
- •11.2.5 Other Imaging Findings
- •11.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •11.3.1 Hepatic Adenoma
- •11.3.2 Hemangioma
- •11.3.3 Focal Nodular Hyperplasia
- •11.3.4 Hepatic Abscess
- •11.3.5 Hypervascular Metastases
- •11.3.6 Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- •11.3.7 Arteriovenous Malformations
- •11.4 Pathology
- •11.4.1 General Features
- •11.5 Clinical Issues
- •11.5.1 Presentation
- •11.5.2 Prognosis
- •11.5.3 Treatment
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.8 Summary
- •References
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Indications
- •14.3 Equipment
- •14.4 3D-CEUS Procedures
- •14.5 Clinical Application
- •References
- •15: Future Prospects
- •15.2 Improved Liver Metastasis Detection (Sonazoid)
- •References

gh
4 Malignant Liver Tumors
57
a
c
b
d
e
f
Fig. 4.17 Nodule-in-nodule appearance. The patient is a 47-year-old
man with hepatitis B cirrhosis and an LR-4 lesion on B mode ultrasound (a). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound showed a 32-mm nodule with
a nodule-in-nodule appearance in the arterial phase (arrows) (b–e). The
entire nodule displays hypoenhancement in the arterial phase, while a
hyperenhanced nodular could be detected inside the lesion (arrows)
(b–e). The whole lesion showed isoenhancement both on portal venous
phase (f) and on late phase (g, h). With regard to surgery and histopathological results, this is typical of a well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (stage II) focus developed in a dysplastic nodule (i–m)

58
i j
k
Y. Dong et al.
Fig. 4.17 (continued)
ml

ab
ef
gh
4 Malignant Liver Tumors
59
c
d
Fig. 4.18 Mosaic appearance. The patient is a 63-year-old man with
hepatitis B virus cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (a). Color ow
signals could be detected inside the lesion (b). After injection of con-
trast agents, heterogeneous enhancement could be detected both in arterial phase (c) and in portal venous phase (d)

60
Y. Dong et al.
a
c
b
d
Fig. 4.19 Mosaic appearance. The patient is a 41-year-old woman
with hepatitis B virus cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. A heterogenous 8.5-cm LR-5 hypoechoic lesion could be detected on B mode
ultrasound (a). Color ow signals could be detected inside the lesion
be observed in 38–69% of ICCs. The peripheral hyperenhancement areas always indicate abundant tumor cells and
the central areas correspond to brotic stroma at pathological examination. The other enhancement patterns are heterogeneously branched hyperenhancement (Fig. 4.28),
hyperenhancement with vague boundary (Fig. 4.33), and
heterogeneous hypoenhancement (Fig. 4.34). In patients
with cirrhosis or small tumor size, the wash-in patterns of
ICC on CEUS could be similar to those of HCC, which manifest homogeneous and heterogeneous hyperenhancement.
Recent studies further revealed that wash-out of ICC was
much earlier (<60s) than that of HCC, and wash-out degree
was more marked in ICC than that in HCC [20–24].
Intraductal-growth type
ICCs with intraductal-growth type often show that the intraductal tumor manifests slightly hyperenhancement in the
(b). During arterial phase, the lesion showed heterogeneous hyperenhancement both on two-dimensional contrast enhanced ultrasound
(CEUS) (c) and three-dimensional CEUS (d)
arterial phase and gradually enhancement, followed by portal venous/late phase wash-out (Figs.4.29 and 4.30).
Periductal-inltrating type
ICCs with periductal-inltrating types are rare. It is hard to
detect tumors with this type before surgery. Fibrosis is more
commonly found in this type, therefore this type often shows
slightly hyperenhancement or isoenhancement in the arterial
phase followed by early wash-out (Fig.4.31).
4.2.2.3 CT Findings
ICCs usually manifest to be hypodense hepatic masses with
irregular margins on unenhanced CT.On arterial phase of
dynamic enhanced CT, ICCs usually show peripheral
enhancement, and the center of the tumor (with few cells
and abundant stroma) remains poorly enhanced. The center
of the tumor gradually enhances on late phase (delayed

4 Malignant Liver Tumors
61
a
b
c
Fig. 4.20 Images of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) LR-4,
probably hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), in a 57-year-old man with
hepatitis B-related cirrhosis. B mode ultrasound image showed a 9-mm
diameter hyperechoic nodule located in right lobe of liver. The lesion
enhancement). This progressive enhancement differs ICC
from HCC. HCC shows arterial phase enhancement followed by late phase wash-out. This feature may reect that
brosis is late enhancement but retains the contrast agent
[14, 25].
4.2.2.4 MRI Findings
On MRI, ICC typically appears hypointense on T1WI and
hyperintense on T2WI.T2WI may show central hypointensity due to brosis. Dynamic enhanced MRI shows arterial
phase peripheral enhancement followed by progressive and
centripetal lling in Fig.4.32. Pooling of contrast agent in
the delayed phase indicates brosis and may suggest
ICC.MRI with cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is helpful in visualizing the ductal system and in determining the
anatomic extent of tumor [14, 25].
showed hyperenhancement during arterial phase (a) in comparison with
the adjacent liver. No wash-out was observed during portal venous (b)
or late phase (c). Subsequent biopsy was positive for well-differentiated
HCC
4.2.2.5 Other Imaging Findings
Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDGPET) can detect mass-forming type of ICC with high sensitivity, but PET is less useful for periductal inltrating type.
When CEUS, CT, or MRI has already been performed,
PET-CT for diagnosis of ICC is controversial. The additional
utility of PET is also questioned when extrahepatic suspicious lesion on CT or MRI is absent. The benet of PET for
staging ICC is not clear and thus PET should be used selectively [14, 25].
4.2.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
• Ultrasound, CT, MRI/MRCP, and PET are the most common imaging methods to diagnose and stage ICC.
• Ultrasound is the rst imaging method for patients with
abdominal pain or obstructive jaundice.

62
de
Y. Dong et al.
a
b
c
Fig. 4.21 Small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a 57-year-old man
with hepatitis B-related cirrhosis. B mode ultrasound image showed a
19-mm diameter hyperechoic nodule located in right lobe of liver (a).
No color ow signals could be detected inside the lesion (b). The lesion
showed hyperenhancement during arterial phase (c) and hypoenhancement during late phase (d). Subsequent surgery and histopathological
result was positive for grade III HCC with microvascular invasion (e)

4 Malignant Liver Tumors
63
a
c
b
d
Fig. 4.22 The reactive inammatory changes occurred after radiofrequency ablation therapy (RFA) in a 47-year-old man with hepatitis
B-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). B mode ultrasound examination 1 day after RFA showed a hypoechoic lesion in the right lobe of
liver (a). After injection of contrast agents, a hyperenhanced peripheral
• Almost all ICCs show wash-out in the portal venous/late
phase on CEUS, while ICCs often show the late enhancement on contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT) or
contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
• Intraoperative ultrasound is valuable to guide surgical
resection of ICC, to detect intrahepatic biliary stones, and
to guide radiofrequency ablation.
• Tumor markers do not have high sensitivity and specicity to make a diagnosis or rule out ICC.
• Biopsy is not necessary if curative resection is planned.
4.2.3 Dierential Diagnosis
4.2.3.1 Hepatocellular Carcinoma
The typical enhancement pattern of HCC on CEUS is arterial phase hyperenhancement followed by wash-out in the
portal venous and/or late phases under the background of
hyperemia of the treated lesion could be detected during arterial phase
(b), portal venous phase (c) to the late phase (d) of contrast enhanced
ultrasound. This reactive hyperemia may last for 2–3 weeks after local
ablation therapy
liver cirrhosis. Some studies suggested that there is an
overlap between the wash-in pattern of ICC and HCC on
CEUS in liver cirrhosis patients or small tumor. The guidelines of the American Association for the study of Liver
Diseases (AASLD) have removed CEUS from the diagnostic modalities for HCC, because of the misdiagnosis
probability [26].
The arterial enhancement patterns and temporal presentation between ICCs and HCCs are different. Most HCC
lesions manifest global hyperenhancement in arterial phase,
whereas most ICC lesions manifest peripheral hyperenhancement. Furthermore, recent studies revealed that the
timing of wash-out in ICC was much earlier than that in
HCC, as well as the degree of wash-out was more marked in
ICC than that in HCC.These two differences may differentiate ICC from HCC. Arterial phase hyperenhancement followed by late (>60s) wash-out of mild degree is now dened
to be a rened diagnosis of HCC on CEUS [21, 23, 24, 27].

64
Y. Dong et al.
a
b
c
Fig. 4.23 Tumor recurrence after RFA in a 63-year-old woman with
hepatitis B-related cirrhosis. B mode ultrasound image obtained 1
month after RFA showed a typical heterogeneous hypoechoic treatment
site (arrow) (a). CEUS image obtained 18s after contrast agent injec-
4.2.4 Pathology
4.2.4.1 General Features
ICC often occurs in a normal liver. Most ICCs are adenocarcinoma with variable differentiation and broplasia. A variable
and occasionally abundant brous stroma is an important characteristic of ICC. Fibrous encapsulation is not seen. ICC
directly invades the surrounding hepatic parenchyma and may
tion showed a nodular region of APHE (arrows) near the treatment site
(b). CEUS image obtained at 89s showed marked wash-out (arrows) of
this nodular (c). This patient underwent repeat ablative therapy
spread along the portal tracts. The mass-forming type of ICC
can be quite large. The periphery of the tumors contains more
abundant, proliferating cells, and the center of the tumors is
usually more sclerotic and hypocellular (Fig. 4.28). Central
necrosis is common, and there may be focal calcication in
these areas. Mucin hypersecretion can be visible dilated ducts.
Regional lymph nodes are often involved. Lungs are the most
common site when blood-borne metastases occur later [15].

a
4 Malignant Liver Tumors
65
b
c
e
d
f
g
Fig. 4.24 Tumor residual after microwave ablation (MWA) in a
41-year-old woman with hepatitis B-related cirrhosis. B mode ultrasound image (BMUS) obtained 1 day after MWA showed a heterogeneous hypoechoic focal liver lesion located in right lobe of liver (a).
CEUS image obtained 29s after contrast agent injection showed complete hyperenhancement of the lesion (b). Time intensity curves made
quantitative analysis of the tumor perfusion (c). One day after MWA,
the lesion showed heterogenous on BMUS (d), no color ow signals
could be detected inside the lesion (e). However, CEUS image obtained
at 37 s showed APHE (f). The residual tumor perfusion was further
proved by TIC analysis (g). This patient underwent repeat MWA
therapy

66
a
Y. Dong et al.
b
c
e
d
f
g
Fig. 4.25 Tumor residual after transarterial chemoembolization
(TACE) in a 63-year-old woman with hepatitis B-related cirrhosis.
Grayscale US image obtained 1 month after TACE shows a typical heterogeneous treatment lesion (a). No color ow signal could be detected
inside the lesion (b). CEUS image obtained 20s after contrast agent
injection shows a nodular region of APHE (arrows) within the treatment
h
site (c). CEUS image obtained at portal venous (d) and late phase (e)
showed isoenhancement without wash-out. Also, the hyperenhanced
nodular could be detected on 3D-CEUS (f), MRI (g), and DSA (h). This
patient underwent surgery therapy (i) and was proved by histopathological results (j)
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
