Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5762_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
79 Мб
Скачать
148
Q. Lu et al.
the non-specic clinical and imaging features of inltra­tion type. Nowadays, with the update of treatment strate­gies, the 5-year survival rate has been reported to reach 77–83%.
6.1.5.3 Treatment
The optimal therapy strategy for PHL is still unclear and treatment options include surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or a combination of these therapies. Surgical resec­tion might be performed for patients with localized disease, which can be completely resected, or for debulking prior to chemotherapy [2]. Nevertheless, recurrence after surgery is not unusual and thus PHL is chemosensitive, combined che­motherapy is recommended. For patients with multiple nod­ular and diffuse inltrating types, alternative treatment options are available, including chemotherapy, radiation, or varying combinations. The standard treatment for patients with DLBCL is CHOP.Rituximab combined with cytotoxic treatment after antiviral therapy may improve clinical outcomes.
6.2 Combined Hepatocellular andCholangiocarcinoma
Jia-YingCao, YiDong, and Wen-PingWang

6.2.1 Terminology

Denitions
• Combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma
(cHCC-CCA) is a primary liver cancer (PLC) with unique biphenotypic presence of both hepatocytic and cholangio­cytic differentiation.

6.2.2 Imaging

6.2.2.1 General Features
• The cHCC-CCA lesions are usually found in patients
with chronic viral hepatitis or liver cirrhosis. They could be misdiagnosed as HCC for their similar imaging appear­ances and chronic liver disease background.
• It is imperative for radiologists to understand the imaging
characteristics of its subtypes according to the 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) classication of tumors of the digestive system.
• The 2010 WHO classication system classied cHCC-
CCA into three variants, including “typical” subtype, “intermediate cell” subtype, and “cholangiocellular” subtype.
• Contrast enhanced pattern on CEUS/CECT/CEMRI – HCC-like pattern – CCA-like pattern – Mixed pattern
6.2.2.2 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
• It is convenient to detect cHCC-CCA lesions on B mode
ultrasound, but the accurate diagnosis of cHCC-CCA can be a great challenge because of its untypical grayscale ultrasound features.
• The cHCC-CCA lesions were demonstrated heteroge-
neously hypoechoic with unclear margins and irregular shapes on B mode ultrasound (BMUS) [6].
• Target appearance, as a specic appearance of cHCC-
CCA, is dened as ovoid hypoechoic mass with central hyperechoic portion (Fig.6.6) [7]. However, it is not rec­ommended as a common pattern of this rare tumor.
• Color ow imaging may help to detect arterial ow sig-
nals and arterial Doppler spectrum with high resistance index (RI) (Fig.6.6) [6].
6.2.2.3 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
• As HCC-like features were more common than CCC-like
features, most cHCC-CCA lesions show similar enhancement with HCC on CEUS.They show hyperen­hancement in arterial phase and rapid wash-out [6] (Figs.6.6 and 6.7).
– HCC-CCA could show rim enhancement (Fig.6.8) or
complete enhancement (Fig.6.9) during arterial phase, and hypoenhancement in early portal phase.
– Early wash-out was observed in 64% lesions, whereas
late wash-out was only observed in 4% lesions.
• The enhancement pattern of cHCC-CCA varies according
to the histological variety of CCA, rather than HCC.
• Combination of enhancement patterns on CEUS and
serum tumor markers (AFP and CA19-9) may be helpful in differentiating HCC-CCA from other primary liver tumors [8].
6.2.2.4 CT Findings
• HCC-CCA lesions may show well-dened low and/or
isoattenuation on plain CT scan [7].
• Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is
helpful in differentiating cHCC-CCA from HCC when pseudocapsule and extensive necrosis exist [9].
• The presence of intermediate characteristics between
HCC and CCA leads to misdiagnosis [10].
• The cHCC-CCA showed hypervascularity on computed
tomography angiography (CTA) images.
6.2.2.5 MRI Findings
• The appearances of cHCC-CCA may differ in patients
with normal, brotic, and cirrhotic livers [11].
e
a
6 Rare Malignant Liver Tumors
149
b
c
d
f
Fig. 6.6 A case of combined HCC-CCA (HCC 50% and ICC 50%). B mode ultrasound revealed a focal liver lesion with heterogeneous hypoechoic in the right lobe of liver (a). Color ow imaging showed dotted color ow signals inside the lesion (b). Arterial Doppler spec­trum with high resistance index (RI) as 0.80 was measured (c). After injection of contrast agents, the lesion showed heterogeneous hyperen-
• HCC-CCA could be detected moderate hyperintense on T2-weighted images.
• The ratio of cellular and brous tissue within the tumor, rather than the characteristics of the tumor cells them­selves, may contribute to the enhancement pattern.
hancement in arterial phase. The hyperechoic part of the lesion on B mode ultrasound (BMUS) showed marked hyperenhancement, while the hypoechoic part of the lesion on BMUS showed rim-like hyperen­hancement (d, e). The lesion showed heterogeneous wash-out in the portal venous phase, and the hypoechoic part of the lesion on BMUS showed more obvious hypoenhancement (f)
• Enhancement patterns of cHCC-CCA may differ in dif­ferent tumor sizes.
• Enhancement patterns of cHCC-CCA include ring­enhancement and diffuse heterogeneous enhancement in early arterial phase.
150
a
Q. Lu et al.
• MRI could be used to differ HCC-CCA from CCA [12]. – The most common enhancement patterns for CCA
were peripheral hypoenhancement with progression, followed by heterogeneous hypoenhancement with progress on contrast enhanced MRI.
– The cHCC-CCA lesions could be associated with arte-
rial phase enhancement, the presence of wash-out, gradual enhancement without wash-out, intra-lesional fat, and hemorrhage [13].
6.2.2.6 Other Imaging Findings
• The fusion of positron emission tomography (PET)/CT
images is useful in detecting extrahepatic metastases in HCC and HCC-CCA [14].
• The cHCC-CCA lesions combined with primary biliary cir-
rhosis showed FDG-PET accumulation of the tumor area and lymph node and simultaneous elevation of AFP [15].
6.2.2.7 Imaging Recommendations
• Conventional B mode ultrasound could be used for early detection and follow-up after surgery.
• The diagnosis of cHCC-CCA should be considered when a hypovascular PLC lesion is associated with remarkable elevation of AFP levels and multiple regional lymphade­nopathy, or when a hypervascular PLC lesion is associ­ated with increased serum levels of CEA and CA199.
• CEUS could reveal microvascularity of tumor and real­time dynamic enhancement without missing the early arterial enhancement.
• Protocol advice
– Biopsy
US-guided biopsy is recommended as an potential technique to make a denite diagnosis. Biopsy should be performed when other examinations were incon­clusive or atypical.
b
c
Fig. 6.7 A case of combined HCC-CCA (HCC 50% and ICC 50%). B mode ultrasound (BMUS) revealed a hypoechoic mass near the capsule of the right lobe of liver (arrow) (a). No color ow signals could be
d
detected inside the lesion (b). On CEUS, the lesion showed hyperen­hancement in arterial phase (c, d, e, f) followed by wash-out in most of the lesion in portal venous phase (g)
e
6 Rare Malignant Liver Tumors
g
151
f
Fig. 6.7 (continued)
– CEUS

6.2.4 Pathology

The combination of CEUS and elevation of tumor markers is helpful to diagnose HCC-CCA.
6.2.4.1 General Features
• It is recommended that each component and its propor­tion should be mentioned of cHCC-CCAs, which exhibits
6.2.3 Dierential Diagnosis
wide histological diversity.
• It is a mixture of HCC, CCA, and other connective tissues
HCC and CCA
[16].
• The cell arrangement of HCC lesions are in trabecular or
• The imaging appearance of cHCC-CCA is similar to both HCC and CCA because of its components of HCC and CCA, which make it confusing to diagnose.
• Since histological diagnosis is the only examination to conrm this rare tumor, US/CT guided biopsy is crucial.
pseudoglandular formation, while the CCA cells are arranged in duct-like formation.
• The cellular origin of cHCC-CCA still remains unclear.
• Sarcomatoid change transformation is the most common transformation of HCC-CCA. Spindle cell carcinoma component could be observed in tumors.
• VEGF expression is more likely to be positive in HCC than HCC-CCA.
152
a
Q. Lu et al.

6.2.5 Clinical Issues

6.2.5.1 Presentation
• Most common signs/symptoms – Asymptomatic – Abdominal pain, jaundice
• HCC-CCA only conrmed from histology and immuno-
histochemistry, the real incidence may be higher than published gures for absence of an accurate pathological diagnosis.
• HCC-CCA characterizes in male predominance.
• HBV and HCV are likely to be the pivotal pathogenic fac-
tors [17].
• A large part of HCC-CCA with background of cirrhosis
[18].
6.2.5.2 Prognosis
• There exist etiological differences between Asian and
Western cHCC-CCA patients.
• HCC-CCA is similar to HCC in demographics and clinical characteristics, but shows similarity with CCA in prognosis.
• The overall survival rate of HCC-CCA is lower than HCC but higher than CCA.
6.2.5.3 Treatment
• Treatment depends on the predominant component of the cHCC-CCA lesions.
• Radical operation is the optimal therapeutic modality [19].
– Lymph node dissection is crucially important for
prognosis.
– Postoperative recurrence limited the efcacy of
treatment.
– Radical operation is the best choice for recurrence
lesions as well.
• Local ablation therapy (LAT)
– Radiofrequency ablation, pure ethanol/acetic acid
injection therapy, and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.
b
c
Fig. 6.8 A case of combined HCC-CCA (HCC 30% and ICC 70%). B mode ultrasound (BMUS) revealed a hypoechoic mass near the surface of the right lobe of liver (a). Dotted color ow signals could be detected
d
inside the lesion (b). On contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), the lesion showed rim-like hyperenhancement in arterial phase (c, d, e), followed by wash-out in portal venous and late phases (f, g, h)
6 Rare Malignant Liver Tumors
153
f
g
Fig. 6.8 (continued)
– LAT may be valuable for patients with recurrent small
cHCC-CCA and hypohepatia [20].
• TACE – TACE is likely to be helpful in patients with recurrent
unresectable cHCC-CCA [20].
• Palliative chemotherapy. – Palliative therapies are for advanced stage patients.
• Liver transplantation (LT)
6.3 Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular
Carcinoma
YiDong, Pei-LiFan, and Wen-PingWang
h

6.3.1 Terminology

Denitions
• Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (f-HCC) is a kind of primary liver cancer.
– The epidemiologic, clinical, and histopathologic fea-
tures of f-HCC are signicantly different from HCC [21].
• The etiology of f-HCC is still unknown.
• The biological behavior of f-HCC is various from a lazy tumor to an aggressive pattern (local invasion or distant metastasis).
154
ef
a
cd
Q. Lu et al.
b
g
Fig. 6.9 A case of combined HCC-CCA (HCC 20% and ICC 80%). B mode ultrasound (BMUS) revealed a hypoechoic focal liver lesion under the capsule of the right lobe of liver (arrow) (a). No color ow signal could be detected inside the lesion (b). On contrast enhanced
ultrasound (CEUS), the lesion showed entire hyperenhancement in arterial phase (c, d, e), followed by mild wash-out in the portal venous and late phases (f, g)
a
6 Rare Malignant Liver Tumors
155

6.3.2 Imaging

6.3.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
• f-HCC manifests as a solid and heterogeneous lesion with capsule on B mode ultrasound (US) (Fig.6.10) [21].
• The lesions are mainly isoechoic, with small hyperechoic areas inside, without signs of chronic liver disease or changes in portal vein or bile duct permeability.
• Almost all f-HCC lesions occur in normal liver, rarely in liver cirrhosis.
6.3.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS)
Findings
• The f-HCC lesions show arterial phase heterogeneous hyperenhancement and hypoenhancement in portal venous and late phases, which is a sign of malignant tumor [22] (Fig.6.11).
– Centripetal enhancement without spoke-like images
(Fig.6.10).
• Sometimes, a non-enhanced central scar could be detected inside f-HCC lesions (Figs.6.10 and 6.12) [22].
6.3.2.3 Computed Tomography Findings
• Computed Tomography (CT) plain scan shows low- density mass with a clear margin and lobulation (Fig.6.10).
• It is an important characteristic of f-HCC that there is a star-shaped brous scar in the center of the tumor (Fig.6.10).
– A large scar (width >2cm) and radial septa are com-
monly seen.
• Another characteristic is that there may be spot calcica­tion in the center of the scar [22].
• Most f-HCC lesions show heterogeneous hyperattenua­tion on arterial phase images (Fig.6.10).
b
c
Fig. 6.10 A case of brolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (f-HCC). B mode ultrasound (BMUS) revealed a heterogenous hypoechoic lesion (acoustic shadow) in the left lobe of liver (a). Filiform blood signals could be detected inside the lesion (b). Arterial Doppler spectrum with high resistance index (RI) as 0.77 was measured (c). After injection of contrast agent, the lesion showed heterogeneous centripetal hyperen­hancement during arterial phase, and the central scar was not enhanced
d
(d, e, f, g) on contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). The lesion showed centrifugal wash-out in portal venous and late phases (h, i, j). On CT plain scan, the lesion was a lobulated hypodensity mass with clear mar­gin (k). On dynamic enhanced CT, the lesion showed heterogeneous hyperenhancement in arterial phase (l) and iso- enhancement in portal phase (m) with non-enhanced brous central scar in the center of tumor
156
e
ij
Q. Lu et al.
f
g
h
k
Fig. 6.10 (continued)
m
a
6 Rare Malignant Liver Tumors
l
Fig. 6.10 (continued)
157
b
c
Fig. 6.11 A case of brolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (f-HCC). B mode ultrasound (BMUS) revealed a large heterogeneous hypoechoic lesion in the left lobe of liver (arrows) (a). Abundant color ow signals could be detected inside the lesion (b). After injection of contrast agent,
d
the lesion showed arterial phase heterogeneous hyperenhancement fol­lowed by wash-out in portal venous and late phases (arrows) (c, d, e, f, g)