Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5762_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
79 Мб
Скачать
262
ab
J.-Y. Cao et al.
essential to keep the same dose of contrast agent injected each time, and the same preset conditions of the ultrasound machine. Ultrasound contrast media, was injected intravenously as a
2.0–2.4 ml bolus followed by 5 ml of normal sterile saline ush. A low mechanical index (MI), ranging from 0.10 to
0.14, was used for real-time imaging. After carefully deter­mining the position and direction of the probe contacted after 2D-CEUS, 3D-CEUS should be performed in the same ses­sion with an interval time of at least 10min.

14.4 3D-CEUS Procedures

The patients can be examined lying on the left ank or in the supine position, and the liver should be rstly scanned com­pletely by conventional B mode ultrasound. Conventional 2D-CEUS is also essential before 3D-CEUS examinations. In dynamic 3D-CEUS examination, patients should be guided to keep regular shallow breathing as far as possible to reduce interference of great breathing movement. The probe remains stable on the surface of the scanning area to store ongoing clip in DICOM format after injection of contrast agent. During 3D-CEUS acquisition, three orthogonal planes of 2D-CEUS and one 3D-CEUS volume image can be observed simultane­ously in four quadrants of the same view window and 3D stereo images are displayed in the last quadrant at the same time, as shown in Fig.14.1. The “multi- slice” mode can also help us to observe the internal enhancement of the FLL from various directions on several equidistant slices to acquire more details, as shown in Fig.14.2.
The recent research hot spot of 3D-CEUS has gradually been shifted from the spatial stereo-anatomy of tumor to the combined application of quantication technology, which is expected to evaluate the local treatment response of malig-
nant tumors. The previously used 3D-CEUS storage capacity can only capture dynamic raw data of about only 20–30s at a time, so it may miss other enhanced information beyond the capture period. At present, the limitation of storage time has been overcome of some ultrasound unit by upgrading 3D-CEUS system, and the ability of continuous unlimited storage that allows the quantitative analysis possible has fur­ther potentiated dynamic 3D-CEUS.
The post-processing includes rotation of any frame and adjustment of contrast degree to highlight 3D reconstruction effect of the FLL slice by slice, when the dynamic 3D-CEUS raw data is activated. During the quantication, region of inter­est (ROI) should be selected to envelop the whole FLL at the clearest displaying frame, which was suggested in the arterial
Fig. 14.2 An example of three-dimensional contrast enhanced ultra­sound (3D-CEUS) “multislice” mode image. A hepatocellular carci­noma (HCC) lesion after several transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) procedures was shown on eight equidistant two-dimensional (2D) slices extracted from 3D-CEUS data. Several hyperechoic arti­facts and an enhanced residual nodule within the tumor
Fig. 14.1 An example of three-dimensional contrast enhanced ultra­sound (3D-CEUS) examination image of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patient treated by radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Three orthog­onal planes of two-dimensional contrast enhanced ultrasound
(2D-CEUS) and a 3D-CEUS volume image can be observed simultane­ously in four quadrants of the same view window during 3D-CEUS acquisition (a). The residual tumor was visible clearly. Gross specimen after surgical section conrmed the residual tumor (b)
14 Dynamic Three-Dimensional Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound withQuantication ofFocal Liver Lesions
263
phase of the contrast process. In order to improve the tting degree of TIC and reect the contrast process as accurately as possible, ROI can be selected in arterial phase, and the position of ROI can be adjusted appropriately in late phase other than in portal phase. Dynamic 3D-CEUS showed FLLs most obvi­ously in arterial phase, followed by late phase, and the worst in portal phase [2]. The average value of TIC parameters, which is obtained from current-used CEUS quantitative analysis tech­nology, whether 2D or 3D, may mask the heterogeneity of the tumor. In the process of TIC generation, the size and shape of ROI could be adjusted to make the tting curve as close as pos­sible to the original curve. Seven TIC parameters can be extracted from the smooth tting curve: (1) peak intensity (PI) represents the highest intensity value obtained by TIC with dened ROI; (2) slope (S) is literally dened as the slope of the tangent of the wash-in at half maximum; (3) area under the curve (AUC) corresponding to area under the TIC; (4)AUC of wash-in (AWI) represents the wash-in part of the AUC; (5) AUC of wash-out (AWO) represents the wash-out part of the AUC; (6) time to peak intensity (TP), which is the time required for the contrast media from arriving in ROI to reaching PI; and (7) mean transit time (MTT) is the time interval during which the intensity value was higher than PI/2. Quality of tting (QOF) is required to evaluate the tting degree of the original curve and the tting curve. The TIC parameters would be invalid if the value of QOF was no more than 0.75.
The relative displacements caused by breathing can be cor­rected and compensated by the built-in motion tracking system and manually adjusting the axial and sagittal planes of FLLs.

14.5 Clinical Application

Dynamic 3D-CEUS is an effective method to visualize the characteristic vascular structure of FLLs. On 3D-CEUS, dif­ferent kinds of FLLs show different enhancement. Early
homogeneous or heterogeneous tumor enhancement patterns had an acceptable sensitivity and specicity for diagnosing FLLs. Compared with 3D CECT, 3D-CEUS was shown to have similar sensitivity and specicity in characterizing vari­ous FLLs. Similar to 2D-CEUS, most HCC lesions are enhanced in an early diffuse enhancement pattern, while most metastatic lesions are enhanced in various patterns, including heterogeneous hypo-enhancement, ring-like enhancement, and non-enhancement [4]. The most common focal benign lesions, including hemangiomas and focal nod­ular hyperplasia (FNH), are enhanced in peripheral nodular enhancement and spoke-wheel hyperenhancement, respec­tively (Fig.14.3). Dynamic 3D-CEUS exhibits a higher spa­tial resolution of the continuous perfusion of the feeding vessels and their origin, continuity, and distribution (Fig.14.4).
Dynamic 3D-CEUS could reect the spatial relationship of liver tumor and its vessels. It could also highlight the spa­tial stereo structure of the tumor. It is worth mentioning that dynamic 3D-CEUS has been explored more in treatment response monitoring than in the differential diagnosis of FLL.It can be used to evaluate whether the nutrient artery has been blocked after minimally invasive treatment. Several studies have applied 3D-CEUS to evaluate TACE and RFA response of HCC. 3D-CEUS was reported to show a highly consistent assessment of ablation efcacy for HCC com­pared with contrast CT.PI of TIC from 3D-CEUS has shown potential to evaluate HCC TACE response as early as 1–2 weeks post treatment [6]. Recently, preclinical studies have already demonstrated that dynamic 3D-CEUS allows a reli­able assessment of early treatment efcacy and prediction of response after anti-angiogenic and targeted therapy by using immunohistochemistry result of pathology as a reference [7] (Fig.14.5).
In addition, dynamic 3D-CEUS can be used to measure the necrotic portion and compare the necrosis rate in the treat-
a
Fig. 14.3 A case of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH). It showed spoke-wheel arteries (a) and hyperenhancement (a, b) in the arterial phase on three-dimensional contrast enhanced ultrasound (3D-CEUS) image
b
264
J.-Y. Cao et al.
a
Fig. 14.4 A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesion can be detected clearly in arterial phase (22s after injection of contrast agent) on two­dimensional contrast enhanced ultrasound (2D-CEUS) (a). On three-
a
b
dimensional contrast enhanced ultrasound (3D-CEUS), the feeding arteries can be further displayed (b)
b
c
Fig. 14.5 A hyperechoic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesion (a) was enhanced in a heterogeneous hyper-enhancement pattern before (b, c) and 1d post-transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) on three­dimensional contrast enhanced ultrasound (3D-CEUS) images (e, f). It
d
showed heterogeneous hyper-intensity on contrast MRI (d). PI of TIC from 3D-CEUS obviously decreased from 1.6 (c) to 0.3 (f) after TACE treatment
14 Dynamic Three-Dimensional Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound withQuantication ofFocal Liver Lesions
265
e
Fig. 14.5 (continued)
a
f
b
c
Fig. 14.6 There is a small necrotic area in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesion (a). The feeding artery is exhibited more clearly on three­dimensional contrast enhanced ultrasound (3D-CEUS) than its two­dimensional contrast enhanced ultrasound (2D-CEUS) (b). On
ment of liver tumors [6]. Figure14.6 shows an example of calculating tumor volume and non-enhanced portion volume.
However, dynamic 3D-CEUS has technical limitations
imposed by the difculty involved in the relatively slow
d
3D-CEUS, tumor size was calculated as 20.68ml (c), whereas the non­enhanced portion size was 0.37ml (d). Therefore, the necrotic ratio is
1.79%
frame rate, it is difcult to capture every detail of the con­trast process of liver tumors. In addition, scan-blind areas (e.g., located close to the diaphragm) still exist, though a larger scanning range can be obtained via 3D-CEUS than 2D-CEUS [8].
266
J.-Y. Cao et al.
3D-CEUS not only has the unique display advantage in comparison of local treatment response, but also can guide and improve the specic implementation of needle layout scheme before multipolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of large liver tumors.

References

1. Ferraioli G, Meloni MF.Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of the
liver using SonoVue. Ultrasonography. 2018;37:25–35.
2. Cao J, Dong Y, Fan P, Mao F, Wang W.Feasibility of dynamic three-
dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound in focal liver lesions:
image quality evaluation and correlation of quantication with
two-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Clin Hemorheol
Microcirc. 2019;72:305–16.
3. Song Y, Cheng J, Zhang R.Contribution of 3-dimensional contrast-
enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) compared with 2- dimensional
CEUS in the analysis of liver tumors. J Ultrasound Med.
2018;37:1117–28.
4. Cao J, Dong Y, Mao F, Wang W. Dynamic three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound to predict therapeutic response of radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma: preliminary ndings. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:6469703.
5. Beyer LP, Wassermann F, Pregler B, Michalik K, Rennert J, Wiesinger I, Stroszczynski C, et al. Characterization of focal liver lesions using CEUS and MRI with liver-specic contrast media: experience of a single radiologic center. Ultraschall Med. 2017;38:619–25.
6. Nam K, Stanczak M, Lyshchik A, Machado P, Kono Y, Forsberg F, Shaw CM, etal. Evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma transarte­rial chemoembolization using quantitative analysis of 2D and 3D real-time contrast enhanced ultrasound. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2018;4:035039.
7. Wang Z, Wang W, Liu GJ, Yang Z, Chen LD, Huang Y, Li W, etal. The role of quantitation of real-time 3-dimensional contrast­enhanced ultrasound in detecting microvascular invasion: an invivo study. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016;41:1973–9.
8. Lee JC, Yan K, Lee SK, Yang W, Chen MH.Focal liver lesions: real-time 3-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasonography com­pared with 2-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Ultrasound Med. 2017;36:2015–26.

Future Prospects

Wen-PingWang, Bei-JianHuang, andYiDong
15
15.1 Early Diagnosis ofSmall Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Substantial progress have been achieved in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), early and accurate diagno­sis through surveillance of patients at high risk is of vital importance for successful treatment. Since HCC has a high incidence of recurrence following surgery therapy, second­ary surveillance after treatment is regarded as an important part of disease management. On contrast enhanced ultra­sound, secondary surveillance includes assessment of the entire liver for evaluation of new nodules. The presence of hyperenhancement during arterial phase is highly suspicious characteristic of recurrence on CEUS.Meanwhile, the pres­ence of wash-out is not always necessary to make diagnose HCC residual or recurrence.
Early detection of HCC is important since multiple treat­ment options are available for small HCC including curative surgical resection, liver transplantation, or tumor ablation. Advances in liver imaging techniques have facilitated the detection of small malignant liver lesions at an early stage, including borderline hepatic nodules in hepatocarcinogene­sis [1, 2].
Since the hyperenhancement during arterial phase of CEUS is the hallmark of malignancy and essential to diagno­sis conrmation [3]. Currently, the reported overall diagnos­tic accuracy of CEUS in FLLs 10mm (n = 62) was 80.6%, with 92.7% positive predictive value and 85.7% negative predictive value was [4]. Sonazoid-enhanced CEUS was reported to precisely evaluate not only tumor enhancement, but also the tumor vessel patterns [5]. The tumor vessel pat­terns observed during arterial phase of CEUS may be useful for differentiating regenerative nodulars (RN) from high-
W.-P. Wang (*) · B.-J. Huang · Y. Dong Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China e-mail: huang.beijian@zs-hospital.sh.cn;
dong.yi@zs-hospital.sh.cn
grade degenerative nodulars (HGDN) and early HCC in patients with chronic liver hepatitis or cirrhosis. On Sonazoid-enhanced CEUS, most of the early HCC and HGDN lesions showed a peripheral vessel pattern during arterial phase [5].

15.2 Improved Liver Metastasis Detection (Sonazoid)

CEUS is accurate in characterization of hepatocellular nod­ules, but is limited in the detection of small hepatocellular nodule, especially if nodules cannot be detected with con­ventional ultrasound. In clinical practice, sweeps through the whole liver are performed during late phase to nd additional conspicuous wash-out areas. Since prolonged continuous scanning might cause destruction of microbubbles, the sweeps of the whole liver should be performed quickly.
Sonazoid is peruorobutane microbubbles in a phospho­lipid shell. Its microbubbles are phagocytosed intact by Kupffer cells and retained within the reticuloendothelial system. CEUS performed with Sonazoid allows liver-spe­cic Kupffer phase imaging for at least 60min. Thus, any malignant liver tissue with markedly fewer or absent Kupffer cells shows a signal defect on CEUS images during Kupffer phase [6].
15.3 Machine Learning Algorithm
andRadiomics Approach inPredicting Microvascular Invasion or Tumor Recurrence
Although there have been great advances in therapeutic modalities of HCCs, the 5-year survival rates and 5-year recurrence rate have been reported to be 30–50% and 70–85%, respectively. The prognosis of poorly differentiated HCC is especially unfavorable. Since disease recurrence
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021 W.-P. Wang et al. (eds.), Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Hepatic Neoplasms,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1761-4_15
267
268
W.-P. Wang et al.
following curative-intent ablations occurs in approximately 50% of patients within 2 years and in 70% of patients within 5 years [7]. It is of vital importance to make appropriate clin­ical management. The earlier the recurrence is detected, the better the disease control might be.
The early and accurate prediction of local tumor responses to the rst TACE session has a critical clinical impact on the overall management of HCCs. An emerging computer­assisted technology, radiomics based on ultrasound images can provide comprehensive quantications of large amounts of high output image features, which has the potential to reveal disease characteristics that be impossible to be appre­ciated by human eyes. One initial study proved that deep learning based radiomics model combining CEUS examina­tion holds good potential for beneting TACE candidates in the clinical practice [8].
Radiomics algorithm based on multi-modal ultrasound images could be helpful in diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and prediction of clinical prognosis of liver tumors [9]. Radiomics analysis based on ultrasound original radio fre­quency (ORF) signals data combined with signal analysis and processing technology can effectively predict microvas­cular invasion (MVI) in HCC patients [10]. Radiomic algo­rithm based on grayscale ultrasound images has potential clinical application value for non-invasively preoperative prediction of MVI in HCC patients. The gross-tumoral region radiomic signature was proved to be useful in further discriminating between M1 and M2 levels among MVI­positive patients [11].
15.4 Next Generation Contrast Imaging
Technologies
Compared to current clinical practice, recent advancements in ultrasound system and transducer provide improved spa­tial and temporal imaging resolution. With improved spatial resolution and temporal resolution, new CEUS technologies enables microvascular imaging and ow visualization, which will be put into reality in the next decades.
Superharmonic imaging is a brand new contrast-enhanced technique with improved resolution. It takes unique advan­tage of excitation of microbubbles at low frequencies, and detection of the broadband harmonics at high frequencies. The superharmonic imaging can be performed with very high bandwidth ultrasound transducers [12]. When per­formed with 3D CEUS, the real-time microvascular imaging is referred to as acoustic angiography. It can enable visual­ization of dynamic microvascular perfusion with high tem­poral resolution in the liver, enabling visualization of suspected microvascular invasion.
Superresolution contrast-enhanced ultrasound, also be called ultrasound localization microscopy, is an exten­sion of high frame rate plane wave imaging. This tech­nology exploits the stochastic blinking of specific fluorescent sources and localizes the center of each sepa­rable source [13].
When be performed with ultrasound, the position of each moving bubble is approximated by estimation of the center of the signal it returns. As a result, a reconstructed micro­bubble ow image could be depicted with extremely high resolution [14]. Currently the super-resolution contrast enhanced ultrasound still requires huge and signicant post­processing to acquire the 3D volume.
15.5 Emerging Application ofCEUS
fortheInterventional Procedure
CEUS during interventional procedure guidance can not only depict lesions, but also provide post-procedure assess­ment of treatment response. Depending on the unique physi­cal properties of ultrasound microbubble contrast agents, it is possible to amend them as therapeutic vehicles for future therapeutic innovations, such as drug delivery, vascular ow augmentation, and thrombolysis.
In previous studies, intra-arterial CEUS with direct administration of microbubble contrast agents during trans­arterial liver tumor interventions to assess tumor vascular supply. By identifying additional tumor feeding vessels or resulting in a change in catheter position, intra-arterial CEUS changed the treatment plan in most patients. Intraarterial CEUS could increase the accuracy of TACE by clearly delin­eating the vascular supply. Intra-arterial CEUS could also potentially decrease the amount of iodinated contrast mate­rial required during TACE procedure, especially for patients with renal impairment.
Therapeutic uses of CEUS microbubble agents have potential applications in tumor-targeted therapy and mecha­nochemical thrombolysis.
There are several possible mechanisms for microbubbles to circumvent drug delivery barriers to tumors: (a) permeabil­ity change of transient cell membrane; (b) therapeutic extrav­asation increased by microvessel poration (enlarging endothelial gap junctions); (c) diffusive transport of the thera­peutic agent through the interstitium caused by interstitial pressure modulation; and (d) cellular uptake caused by sono­poration of the target cell membrane. Until now, several phase I studies have explored the use of microbubbles for drug delivery to tumors. Recent research hotpots focus on explor­ing the use of microbubbles to enhance tumor oxygenation, increasing radiation sensitivity and tumoricidal efcacy [15].
15 Future Prospects
269

References

1. Choi BI, Lee JM, Kim TK, Burgio MD, Vilgrain V. Diagnosing borderline hepatic nodules in hepatocarcinogenesis: imaging per­formance. AJR. 2015;205:10–21.
2. Dong Y, Teufel A, Wang WP, Dietrich CF. Current opinion about hepatocellular carcinoma <10mm. Digestion. 2020:1–7.
3. Forner A, Vilana R, Bianchi L, Rodriguez-Lope C, Reig M, Garcia­Criado MA, Rimola J, et al. Lack of arterial hypervascularity at contrast-enhanced ultrasound should not dene the priority for diagnostic work-up of nodules <2cm. J Hepatol. 2015;62:150–5.
4. Strobel D, Bernatik T, Blank W, Schuler A, Greis C, Dietrich CF, Seitz K.Diagnostic accuracy of CEUS in the differential diagnosis of small ( 20mm) and subcentimetric ( 10mm) focal liver lesions in comparison with histology results of the DEGUM multicenter trial. Ultraschall Med. 2011;32:593–7.
5. Numata K, Fukuda H, Nihonmatsu H, Kondo M, Nozaki A, Chuma M, Morimoto M, etal. Use of vessel patterns on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography using a perubutane-based contrast agent for the differential diagnosis of regenerative nodules from early hepatocel­lular carcinoma or high-grade dysplastic nodules in patients with chronic liver disease. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40:2372–83.
6. Park JH, Park MS, Lee SJ, Jeong WK, Lee JY, Park MJ, Lee SS, etal. Contrast-enhanced US with peruorobutane for hepatocellu­lar carcinoma surveillance: a multicenter diagnostic trial (SCAN). Radiology. 2019;292:638–46.
7. Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Makuuchi M, Izumi N, Ichida T, Kudo M, Ku Y, etal. Comparison of resection and ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a cohort study based on a Japanese nationwide survey. J Hepatol. 2013;58:724–9.
8. Liu D, Liu F, Xie X, Su L, Liu M, Xie X, Kuang M, et al. Accurate prediction of responses to transarterial chemoemboli-
zation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma by using arti­cial intelligence in contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Eur Radiol. 2020;30:2365–76.
9. Yao Z, Dong Y, Wu G, Zhang Q, Yang D, Yu JH, Wang WP.Preoperative diagnosis and prediction of hepatocellular carci­noma: radiomics analysis based on multi-modal ultrasound images. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:1089.
10. Dong Y, Wang QM, Li Q, Li LY, Zhang Q, Yao Z, Dai M, et al. Preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma: radiomics algorithm based on ultrasound original radio frequency signals. Front Oncol. 2019;9:1203.
11. Dong Y, Zhou L, Xia W, Zhao XY, Zhang Q, Jian JM, Gao X, etal. Preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion in hepatocellu­lar carcinoma: initial application of a radiomic algorithm based on grayscale ultrasound images. Front Oncol. 2020;10:353.
12. Kierski TM, Espindola D, Newsome IG, Cherin E, Yin J, Foster FS, Demore CEM, et al. Superharmonic ultrasound for motion­independent localization microscopy: applications to microvas­cular imaging from low to high ow rates. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2020;67:957–67.
13. Lin F, Shelton SE, Espindola D, Rojas JD, Pinton G, Dayton PA. 3-D ultrasound localization microscopy for identifying micro­vascular morphology features of tumor angiogenesis at a reso­lution beyond the diffraction limit of conventional ultrasound. Theranostics. 2017;7:196–204.
14. Errico C, Pierre J, Pezet S, Desailly Y, Lenkei Z, Couture O, Tanter M. Ultrafast ultrasound localization microscopy for deep super­resolution vascular imaging. Nature. 2015;527:499–502.
15. Daecher A, Stanczak M, Liu JB, Zhang J, Du S, Forsberg F, Leeper DB, et al. Localized microbubble cavitation-based antivascular therapy for improving HCC treatment response to radiotherapy. Cancer Lett. 2017;411:100–5.