Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5762_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •1.1 Historical Remarks
- •1.1.1 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound
- •2.2 Machine Settings
- •1.4 CEUS Phases
- •1.8 Three-Dimensional (3D) CEUS
- •1.9 CEUS Guidelines
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2.2 Image Depth Penetration
- •2.2.3 Focus
- •2.2.5 Background Signal (Noise)
- •2.2.6 Dynamic Range
- •2.2.7 Frame Rate
- •2.6 Artifacts
- •2.6.1 Long Liver Enhancement
- •2.7 Safety
- •References
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.7 Detection by Intraoperative Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (IO-CEUS)
- •References
- •4: Malignant Liver Tumors
- •4.1 Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- •4.1.1 Introduction
- •4.1.6 Surveillance
- •4.1.7 CEUS LI-RADS
- •4.1.8 Small HCC
- •4.1.9 Treatment Response Follow Up
- •4.1.9.1 Ablation Therapy
- •4.1.9.2 Transarterial Chemoembolization
- •4.1.9.3 Targeted Therapy
- •4.2 Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
- •4.2.2 Imaging
- •4.2.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •4.2.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •4.2.2.3 CT Findings
- •4.2.2.4 MRI Findings
- •4.2.2.5 Other Imaging Findings
- •4.2.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •4.2.3.1 Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- •4.2.4 Pathology
- •4.2.4.1 General Features
- •4.2.5 Clinical Issues
- •4.2.5.1 Presentation
- •4.2.5.2 Prognosis
- •4.2.5.3 Treatment
- •4.3 Liver Metastases
- •4.3.1 Terminology
- •4.3.2 Imaging Features
- •4.3.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •4.3.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •4.3.2.3 CT Findings
- •4.3.2.4 MRI Findings
- •4.3.3.1 Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- •4.3.3.2 Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
- •4.3.3.3 Focal Fatty Liver Change
- •4.4 Dysplasia Nodules
- •4.4.1 Terminology
- •4.4.2 Imaging
- •4.4.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •4.4.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •4.4.2.3 CT Findings
- •4.4.2.4 MRI Findings
- •4.4.2.5 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •4.4.4 Pathology
- •4.4.4.1 General Features
- •4.4.5 Clinical Issues
- •4.4.5.1 Presentation
- •4.4.5.2 Prognosis
- •4.4.5.3 Treatment
- •References
- •5: Benign Liver Tumors
- •5.1 Hepatic Hemangioma
- •5.1.1 Terminology
- •5.1.2 Imaging
- •5.1.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •5.1.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •5.1.2.3 CT Findings
- •5.1.2.4 MRI Findings
- •5.1.2.5 Other Imaging Findings
- •5.1.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •5.1.3.1 Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- •5.1.3.2 Metastatic Hepatic Carcinoma
- •5.1.3.3 Focal Angiosarcoma
- •5.1.3.4 Abscess
- •5.1.3.5 Hepatic Adenoma
- •5.1.4 Pathology
- •5.1.4.1 General Features
- •5.1.5 Clinical Issues
- •5.1.5.1 Presentation
- •5.1.5.2 Prognosis
- •5.1.5.3 Treatment
- •5.2 Focal Nodular Hyperplasia
- •5.2.1 Terminology
- •5.2.2 Imaging
- •5.2.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •5.2.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •5.2.2.3 CT Findings
- •5.2.2.4 MRI Findings
- •5.2.2.5 Other Imaging Findings
- •5.2.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •5.2.3.1 Hepatic Adenoma
- •5.2.3.2 Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- •5.2.3.3 Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- •5.2.4 Pathology
- •5.2.4.1 General Features
- •5.2.5 Clinical Issues
- •5.2.5.1 Prognosis
- •5.2.5.2 Treatment
- •5.3 Hepatocellular Adenoma
- •5.3.1 Terminology
- •5.3.2 Imaging
- •5.3.2.1 Ultrasonographic Findings
- •5.3.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •5.3.2.3 CT Findings
- •5.3.2.4 MRI Findings
- •5.3.2.5 Imaging Recommendations
- •5.3.3.1 Focal Nodular Hyperplasia
- •5.3.3.2 Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- •5.3.3.3 Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- •5.3.3.4 Hepatic Hemangioma
- •5.3.4 Pathology
- •5.3.4.1 General Features
- •5.3.5 Clinical Issues
- •5.3.5.1 Presentation
- •5.3.5.2 Complications
- •5.4.1 Terminology
- •5.4.2 Imaging
- •5.4.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •5.4.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •5.4.2.3 CT Findings
- •5.4.2.4 MRI Findings
- •5.4.2.5 Other Imaging Findings
- •5.4.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •5.4.3.1 Hepatocellular Carcinomas
- •5.4.3.2 Metastases
- •5.4.3.3 Hemangioma
- •5.4.4 Pathology
- •5.4.4.1 General Features
- •5.4.5 Clinical Issues
- •5.4.5.1 Presentation
- •5.4.5.2 Prognosis
- •5.4.5.3 Treatment
- •References
- •6: Rare Malignant Liver Tumors
- •6.1 Hepatic Lymphoma
- •6.1.1 Terminology
- •6.1.2 Imaging
- •6.1.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •6.1.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •6.1.2.3 CT Findings
- •6.1.2.4 MRI Findings
- •6.1.2.5 Other Imaging Findings
- •6.1.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •6.1.4 Pathology
- •6.1.4.1 General Features
- •6.1.5 Clinical Issue
- •6.1.5.1 Presentation
- •6.1.5.2 Prognosis
- •6.1.5.3 Treatment
- •6.2.1 Terminology
- •6.2.2 Imaging
- •6.2.2.1 General Features
- •6.2.2.2 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •6.2.2.3 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •6.2.2.4 CT Findings
- •6.2.2.5 MRI Findings
- •6.2.2.6 Other Imaging Findings
- •6.2.2.7 Imaging Recommendations
- •6.2.4 Pathology
- •6.2.4.1 General Features
- •6.2.5 Clinical Issues
- •6.2.5.1 Presentation
- •6.2.5.2 Prognosis
- •6.2.5.3 Treatment
- •6.3.1 Terminology
- •6.3.2 Imaging
- •6.3.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •6.3.2.3 Computed Tomography Findings
- •6.3.2.4 Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings
- •6.3.2.5 Nuclear Medicine Findings
- •6.3.2.6 Imaging Recommendations
- •6.3.3.1 Focal Nodular Hyperplasia
- •6.3.3.2 Hepatocarcinoma
- •6.3.3.4 Hepatoadenoma
- •6.3.3.5 Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
- •6.3.4 Pathology
- •6.3.4.1 General Features
- •6.3.5 Clinical Issues
- •6.3.5.1 Presentation
- •6.3.5.2 Prognosis
- •6.3.5.3 Treatment
- •6.4 Hepatic Biliary Cystadenocarcinoma
- •6.4.1 Terminology
- •6.4.2 Imaging
- •6.4.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •6.4.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •6.4.2.3 CT Findings
- •6.4.2.4 MRI Findings
- •6.4.2.5 Other Imaging Findings
- •6.4.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •6.4.3.1 Hepatic Biliary Cystadenoma
- •6.4.3.2 Simple Hepatic Cysts
- •6.4.3.3 Hemorrhagic Hepatic Cysts
- •6.4.3.4 Metastatic Tumor
- •6.4.3.5 Hepatic Abscesses
- •6.4.3.6 Hydatid Disease
- •6.4.3.9 Mesenchymal Hamartoma
- •6.4.4 Pathology
- •6.4.4.1 General Features
- •6.4.5 Clinical Issues
- •6.4.5.1 Presentation
- •6.4.5.2 Prognosis
- •6.4.5.3 Treatment
- •6.5 Neuroendocrine Neoplasm
- •6.5.1 Terminology
- •6.5.2 Image
- •6.5.2.1 Ultrasonographic Findings
- •6.5.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •6.5.2.3 CT Findings
- •6.5.2.4 MR Findings
- •6.5.2.5 Other Imaging Finding
- •6.5.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •6.5.3.1 Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- •6.5.3.2 Metastatic Hepatic Carcinoma
- •6.5.4 Pathology
- •6.5.4.1 General Features
- •6.5.5 Clinical Issues
- •6.5.5.1 Presentation
- •6.5.5.2 Prognosis
- •6.5.5.3 Treatment
- •6.6.1 Terminology
- •6.6.2 Imaging
- •6.6.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •6.6.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •6.6.2.3 CT Findings
- •6.6.2.4 MRI Findings
- •6.6.2.5 PET/CT Findings
- •6.6.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •6.6.3.1 Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- •6.6.3.2 Cholangiocarcinoma
- •6.6.3.3 Metastatic Liver Cancer
- •6.6.4 Pathology
- •6.6.5 Clinical Issues
- •References
- •7: Rare Benign Liver Tumors
- •7.1 Hepatic Angiomyolipoma
- •7.1.1 Terminology
- •7.1.2 Imaging
- •7.1.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •7.1.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •7.1.2.3 CT Findings
- •7.1.2.4 MRI Findings
- •7.1.2.5 Other Imaging Findings
- •7.1.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •7.1.4 Pathology
- •7.1.4.1 General Features
- •7.1.5 Clinical Issues
- •7.1.5.1 Presentation
- •7.1.5.2 Prognosis
- •7.1.5.3 Treatment
- •7.2 Hepatic Biliary Cystadenoma
- •7.2.1 Terminology
- •7.2.2 Imaging
- •7.2.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •7.2.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Features
- •7.2.2.3 CT Findings
- •7.2.2.4 MRI Findings
- •7.2.2.5 Other Imaging Findings
- •7.2.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •7.2.3.1 Hepatic Biliary Cystadenocarcinoma
- •7.2.3.2 Simple Hepatic Cyst
- •7.2.3.3 Hemorrhagic Hepatic Cysts
- •7.2.3.4 Metastatic Tumor
- •7.2.3.5 Hepatic Abscesses
- •7.2.3.6 Hydatid Disease
- •7.2.3.9 Mesenchymal Hamartoma
- •7.2.4 Pathology
- •7.2.4.1 General Features
- •7.2.5 Clinical Issues
- •7.2.5.1 Presentation
- •7.2.5.2 Prognosis
- •7.2.5.3 Treatment
- •References
- •8: Hepatic Parasitosis
- •8.1 Terminology
- •8.1.1 Echinococcosis
- •8.1.2 Amebiasis
- •8.1.3 Schistosomiasis
- •8.2 Imaging
- •8.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •8.2.1.1 Echinococcosis
- •8.2.1.2 Amebiasis
- •8.2.1.3 Schistosomiasis
- •8.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •8.2.2.1 Echinococcosis
- •8.2.3 CT Findings
- •8.2.3.1 Echinococcosis
- •8.2.3.2 Amebiasis
- •8.2.3.3 Schistosomiasis
- •8.2.4 MRI Findings
- •8.2.4.1 Echinococcosis
- •8.2.4.2 Amebiasis
- •8.2.4.3 Schistosomiasis
- •8.2.5 Other Imaging Findings
- •8.2.5.1 Echinococcosis
- •8.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •8.2.6.1 Echinococcosis
- •8.2.6.2 Amebiasis
- •8.2.6.3 Schistosomiasis
- •8.3 Pathology
- •8.3.1 General features
- •8.3.1.1 Echinococcosis
- •8.3.1.2 Amebiasis
- •8.3.2.1 Echinococcosis
- •8.4 Clinical Issues
- •8.4.1 Presentation
- •8.4.1.1 Echinococcosis
- •8.4.1.2 Amebic Liver Abscess
- •8.4.1.3 Schistosomiasis
- •8.4.2 Prognosis
- •8.4.2.1 Echinococcosis
- •8.4.2.2 Amebiasis
- •8.4.2.3 Schistosomiasis
- •8.4.3 Treatment
- •8.4.3.1 Echinococcosis
- •8.4.3.2 Amebiasis
- •8.4.3.3 Schistosomiasis
- •References
- •9: Hepatic Inflammatory Pseudotumor
- •9.1 Terminology
- •9.2 Imaging
- •9.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •9.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •9.2.3 CT Findings
- •9.2.4 MRI Findings
- •9.2.5 Other Imaging Findings
- •9.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •9.3.1 Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- •9.3.2 Liver Metastasis Tumor
- •9.3.3 Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
- •9.3.4 Liver Abscess
- •9.4 Pathology
- •9.4.1 General Features
- •9.5 Clinical Issues
- •9.5.1 Presentation
- •9.5.2 Prognosis
- •9.5.3 Treatment
- •References
- •10: Hepatic Artery Aneurysm
- •10.1 Terminology
- •10.2 Hepatic Artery Aneurysm
- •10.3 Imaging
- •10.3.1 General Features
- •10.3.2 Radiographic Findings
- •10.3.3 DSA Findings
- •10.3.4 CT Findings
- •10.3.5 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •10.3.7 MRI Findings
- •10.3.8 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •10.3.9 Protocol Advice
- •10.5 Pathology
- •10.5.1 General Features
- •10.6 Clinical Issues
- •10.6.1 Presentation
- •10.6.2 Prognosis
- •10.6.3 Treatment
- •References
- •11: Peliosis Hepatis
- •11.1 Terminology
- •11.2 Imaging
- •11.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
- •11.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
- •11.2.3 CT Findings
- •11.2.4 MRI Findings
- •11.2.5 Other Imaging Findings
- •11.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices
- •11.3.1 Hepatic Adenoma
- •11.3.2 Hemangioma
- •11.3.3 Focal Nodular Hyperplasia
- •11.3.4 Hepatic Abscess
- •11.3.5 Hypervascular Metastases
- •11.3.6 Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- •11.3.7 Arteriovenous Malformations
- •11.4 Pathology
- •11.4.1 General Features
- •11.5 Clinical Issues
- •11.5.1 Presentation
- •11.5.2 Prognosis
- •11.5.3 Treatment
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.8 Summary
- •References
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Indications
- •14.3 Equipment
- •14.4 3D-CEUS Procedures
- •14.5 Clinical Application
- •References
- •15: Future Prospects
- •15.2 Improved Liver Metastasis Detection (Sonazoid)
- •References

26
a
B.-J. Huang et al.
b
c
Fig. 3.1 Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A 44-yearold man with liver cirrhosis and recurrence of HCC.The lesion on VI
hepatic segment beside the primary lesion that had surgical excised 6
months before. The lesion could not be detected on B mode ultrasound
d
(a). During arterial phase of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), the
lesion was hyperenhanced (a), also on MRI image (b). During late
phase, the lesion was hypoenhanced (c, d)
• With the injection of Sonazoid, scanning the entire liver at
3.4 Detection ofLiver Metastases
10min or later after injection helps to detect malignant
nodules since typical HCC shows as an enhancement
defect (Fig.3.2).
• During late phase scan of the whole liver, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) wash-out rapidly regardless of the
appearance in the arterial phase. This may be helpful for
detection of satellite nodules adjacent to a larger lesion that
were not visualized on conventional ultrasound (Fig.3.3).
• Comparing with other imaging modalities, a distinguishing advantage of CEUS is the real time scan with a higher
temporal resolution, which makes it possible to observe
the dynamics enhancement pattern of lesions in detail [2].
• The typical CEUS appearance of liver metastases is
focal contrast wash-out area by scanning the whole
liver segments during portal venous and late phases
(Figs.3.4 and 3.5).
• A second injection of contrast agent can be used to
conrm the malignancy of focal areas of contrast
wash-out by observing hyperenhancement during arterial phase.
• According to a recent meta-analysis, overall sensitivity of
CEUS for diagnosis of liver metastases was 91% (95%
CI: 87–95%).

a
3 Improved Detection ofFocal Liver Lesions withContrast Enhanced Ultrasound
b
27
c
d
Fig. 3.2 Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesions that were
not visualized on conventional ultrasound. A HCC lesion was suspected
on right lobe of liver, while its not distinctive on B mode ultrasound (a).
After injection of Sonazoid, the lesion could be detected as hypoenhanced area during late phase (b) and Kupffer phase (c). The nal diagnosis was conrmed by surgery and histopathological results (d)

28
B.-J. Huang et al.
a
b
c
Fig. 3.3 Detection of satellite nodules adjacent to a large intrahepatic
cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) lesion that were not visualized on conventional ultrasound. A large ICC lesion located in the left lobe of liver
a
Fig. 3.4 An isoechoic liver metastasis lesion from rectal cancer in a
58-year old. The lesion showed complete hyperenhancement during
arterial phase both on contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) (a) and on
showed hyperenhancement during arterial phase (a). Multiple satellite
nodules could be detected during late phase scan (b). PET-CT showed
similar multiple small lesions (c)
b
MRI images (b). During portal venous phase, the lesion showed
hypoenhancement both on CEUS (c) and on MRI (d)

a
cd
3 Improved Detection ofFocal Liver Lesions withContrast Enhanced Ultrasound
Fig. 3.4 (continued)
29
b
c
d
Fig. 3.5 A 59-year-old man with history of surgery of rectal cancer.
Multiple liver metastases were suspected. During arterial phase of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) (a) and MRI (b), multiple hyperen-
hanced lesions could be detected in the whole liver. While on portal
venous phase, all those lesions showed punched wash-out both on
CEUS (c) and on MRI (d)

30
a
B.-J. Huang et al.
3.5 Detection ofSupercially
(Subcapsular) Located FLLs
• Compared to the usual low frequency abdominal convex
transducers (1–5MHz), the utilization of high frequency
7–9MHz (or even higher) linear transducers offers important advantages such as high resolution and better near
eld investigations.
• On imaging with high-frequency linear transducer, the
details of FLLs, including echogenicity, size, boundary,
and blood ow, can be more distinct, which can facilitate
the identication and differentiation between benign and
malignant FLLs.
• With high frequency linear transducers, it is helpful to
improve the detection of liver surface nodularity or for the
detection of small FLLs as deep as 4–5cm.
• CEUS performed with high-frequency linear transducer
is more sensitive in demonstrating tiny blood vessels
within the lesion and nuance difference between small
lesion and liver parenchyma, which is more helpful to
make the plan of surgery and local treatment [3] (Fig.3.6).
b
c
Fig. 3.6 Colon polyps were found by endoscopy half a month ago in a
55-year-old man and conrmed by pathology as malignant tumor. Liver
metastasis was suspected by CT scan. The lesion could not be detected
on B mode ultrasound (BMUS) (a). Color ow signals can be detected
in the peripheral area of the lesion (b). Arterial Doppler spectrum with
resistance index (RI) as 0.64 was measured (c). On BMUS ultrasound
performed by high frequency linear transducer, the boundary of the
d
lesion was clear (d) and more color ow signals can be detected (e). In
arterial phase of CEUS, it showed rapid and complete hyperenhancement (f, g). At 27s after injection of contrast agent, wash-out could be
observed in the center area of the lesion (h). The lesion showed punched
hypoenhancement in portal venous phase (i). By scanning the whole
liver during late phase, more metastasis lesions could also be detected
(j)

e
3 Improved Detection ofFocal Liver Lesions withContrast Enhanced Ultrasound
f
31
g
i
h
j
Fig. 3.6 (continued)

32
B.-J. Huang et al.
3.6 Detection ofFLLs Before Local
Ablation Therapy
• As condent visualization of a target lesion is important
for successful and safe RFA, image-guided RFA is gaining increasing acceptance in clinics.
• During local ablation therapy, ultrasound is the most com-
monly used imaging technique to offer real-time display
and guidance of the insertion of needle. However, targeting of invisible or poorly visualized lesions may be great
challenge.
• In some primary hepatic malignancies, progressive liver
cirrhosis may cause heterogeneous liver background,
which mimics the malignant lesion in the surrounding
hepatic tissues. Repeated ablative treatment will also
make primary or secondary hepatic malignancies indistinctive at ultrasound.
• CEUS guided ablation therapy is a promising technique
for targeting and improving the efciency of treatment of
hepatic malignancies that are indistinctive on B mode
ultrasound [4, 5] (Fig.3.7).
3.7 Detection by Intraoperative Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (IO-CEUS)
• Contrast enhanced intraoperative US (CE-IOUS) has
become a potential imaging method, which enhances
tumor detection and allows to assess the region for resec-
tion, especially for small, isoechoic, supercially located
FLLs not detected at preoperative imaging.
• During the surgical procedure, CE-IOUS is performed
with a high frequency intraoperative transducer, which,
may require a higher dosage of ultrasound contrast
agents.
• During CE-IOUS scan of the whole liver, all the hypoenhanced focal liver lesions during portal venous and late
phases were considered to be malignancies.
• CE-IOUS could detect more small metastases <10 mm,
with sensitivity up to 100% [6] (Fig.3.8).
3.8 Tips toIncrease theDetection Rate
ofCEUS
• Similar with conventional ultrasound, CEUS is highly
operator dependent. The operator should have rich experience in ultrasound examination, and be familiar with liver
anatomy as well as tumoral characteristics.
• It is particularly important to have a comprehensive
understanding of the disease before CEUS, including the
size, number, and location of the lesions, referring to the
other imaging examinations.
• During portal venous phase and late phase, the whole
liver needs to be thoroughly scanned to improve the detection rate of the lesions.
Fig. 3.7 Detection of multiple liver metastases before radiofrequency
ablation (RFA). Multiple small liver metastases from pancreatic cancer
was detected by CT in both right (a) and left liver lobes (b, c). Those
lesions were indistinctive on B mode ultrasound (d, e). After injection
of Sonazoid, multiple hypoenhanced lesions could be detected in right
ba
lobe during portal venous phase (f), and in left lobe during Kupffer
phase (g, h). Additionally, another small lesion (5 mm), which was
supercially located near the surface of left lobe, was also detected during Kupffer phase (i)

gh
3 Improved Detection ofFocal Liver Lesions withContrast Enhanced Ultrasound
dc
33
e
f
Fig. 3.7 (continued)

34
i
Fig. 3.7 (continued)
B.-J. Huang et al.
ba
c
Fig. 3.8 Detection of invisible HCC recurrence by intraoperative contrast enhanced ultrasound with injection of Sonazoid. A suspected
recurrent HCC could not be detected by B mode ultrasound (a), neither
d
by contrast enhanced ultrasound scan (b, c). During surgical operation,
a small (6mm) lesion was identied (d)

3 Improved Detection ofFocal Liver Lesions withContrast Enhanced Ultrasound
35
References
1. Cantisani V, Ricci P, Erturk M, Pagliara E, Drudi F, Calliada F,
Mortele K, et al. Detection of hepatic metastases from colorectal
cancer: prospective evaluation of gray scale US versus SonoVue(R)
low mechanical index real time-enhanced US as compared
with multidetector-CT or Gd-BOPTA-MRI. Ultraschall Med.
2010;31:500–5.
2. Dong Y, Wang WP, Mao F, Dietrich C.Contrast-enhanced ultrasound features of hepatocellular carcinoma not detected during the
screening procedure. Z Gastroenterol. 2017;55:748–53.
3. Wang WP, Dong Y, Cao J, Mao F, Xu Y, Si Q, Dietrich CF.Detection
and characterization of small supercially located focal liver lesions
by contrast-enhanced ultrasound with high frequency transducers.
Med Ultrason. 2017;19:349–56.
4. Dong Y, Wang WP, Gan YH, Huang BJ, Ding H.Radiofrequency
ablation guided by contrast-enhanced ultrasound for hepatic malignancies: preliminary results. Clin Radiol. 2014;69:1129–35.
5. Wiggermann P, Zuber-Jerger I, Zausig Y, Loss M, Scherer MN,
Schreyer AG, Stroszczynski C, etal. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound
improves real-time imaging of ablation region during radiofrequency ablation: preliminary results. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc.
2011;49:43–54.
6. Jung EM, Ross CJ, Rennert J, Scherer MN, Farkas S, von
Breitenbuch P, Schnitzbauer AA, etal. Characterization of microvascularization of liver tumor lesions with high resolution linear
ultrasound and contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) during surgery: rst results. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2010;46:89–99.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
