Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5762_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
79 Мб
Скачать
158
e
Q. Lu et al.
f
g
Fig. 6.11 (continued)
• There are variable enhancement patterns in portal and delayed phases [23].
– In portal phase, most of the lesions showed iso-
showing arterial phase heterogeneous hyperenhancement and isointense or hypointense in portal venous and
delayed phases (Fig.6.10). attenuating (Fig.6.10) or hyperattenuating compared to peripheral liver parenchyma.
– In delayed phase, iso-attenuating is manifested as the
main appearance.
• It has been reported that central stellate scars in lesions
6.3.2.5 Nuclear Medicine Findings
Some previous studies reported that f-HCC showed uptake of 99mTc labeled erythrocytes in the arterial phase followed
by wash-out on the delayed phase. showed non-enhancement in arterial and portal vein phases on contrast enhanced CT (Fig.6.10).
6.3.2.6 Imaging Recommendations
Gold standard
6.3.2.4 Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings
• On Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), f-HCC is hypointense on T1-weighted image (WI) and hyperin­tense on T2WI.
• On both T1WI and T2WI, the central scar is hypointense [23].
• The f-HCC lesion shows restricted diffusion on diffusion­weighted imaging.
• Calcication is rarely detected inside the lesions on MRI.
• After gadolinium contrast medium was injected, the enhancement pattern was similar to that of CT scan,
– The diagnosis of f-HCC can be conrmed by patho-
logical diagnosis after surgery or ultrasound-guided biopsy [24].
Protocol Advices – As most f-HCC patients have no symptoms, B mode
ultrasound can be selected as an available tool for rou­tine early detection and postoperative follow-up examination.
Examination after fasting for 6–8h helps to reduce the interference of gastrointestinal gas.
a
6 Rare Malignant Liver Tumors
159
– It is difcult to make a denite diagnosis of
f-HCC. Careful assessment of imaging modalities before surgical operation is essential.
6.3.3 Dierential Diagnosis
6.3.3.1 Focal Nodular Hyperplasia
The central scar of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) is rarely calcied, and whether there was scar had nothing to do with the size of the lesion [25].
• FNH is rich in blood vessels, which lead to obvious hyperenhancement in arterial phase, except for the center scar. In portal and delayed phases, most lesions were slightly hyperenhancement or isoenhancement.
– Except for the central scar, the enhancement of FNH
was homogeneous.
– Delayed enhancement of scar is the characteristic
manifestation of FNH.
• On MRI, the central scar of FNH is mainly hyperintense on T2WI due to biliary ductules, while that of f-HCC is usually hypointense, which is brous.
• In addition, FNH is iso-enhancement in hepatobiliary phase on enhanced MRI using a liver-specic contrast agent, but it is not common in f-HCC.
6.3.3.2 Hepatocarcinoma
• HCC mainly occurs in elderly patients with obvious gen­der preference (more in men over 60 years old).
• HCC has high-risk factors, including aatoxin B1 intake, chronic viral infection of hepatitis B and C, alcohol abuse,
b
c
Fig. 6.12 A case of brolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (f-HCC). B mode ultrasound (BMUS) showed a large heterogenous hypoechoic lesion in the right lobe of liver (arrows) (a). Filiform blood signals could be detected inside the lesion (b). Arterial Doppler spectrum with high resistance index (RI) as 0.84 was measured (c). Superb microvas­cular imaging revealed abundant branched blood signals inside the lesion (d). On contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), the lesion showed arterial phase heterogeneous hyperenhancement (arrows) with central
d
acoustic shadow (e, f, g, h). The lesion showed isoenhancement in por­tal venous (arrows) (i) and hypoenhancement in late phase (j). On MRI, the lesion was hyperintense on T1-weighted image (WI) (k) and hyper­intense on T2WI (l). The central scar was hypointense on T1WI and hyperintense on T2WI. The lesion showed heterogeneous hyperen­hancement in arterial phase (m) and persistent enhancement in portal venous and delayed phases on contrast enhanced MRI (n, o)
160
e
Q. Lu et al.
f
g
h
Fig. 6.12 (continued)
6 Rare Malignant Liver Tumors
161
i
j
k l
Fig. 6.12 (continued)
162
mn
Q. Lu et al.
o
Fig. 6.12 (continued)
and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Most liver cancer occurs in cirrhosis, which makes cirrhosis the strongest inducing factor [26].
• The level of serum AFP in patients with HCC was signi­cantly increased.
• HCC is mainly supplied by hepatic artery and enhanced early. The characteristic of HCC enhancement is “early in and early out.”
– The enhancement of large HCC lesions is often uneven
because of necrosis in the center.
• Most lesions in portal phase and delayed phase are of hypoenhancement and the boundary is generally clear.
– Compared with f-HCC, typical liver cancer showed
relatively later elution in portal vein phase.
• US is the most commonly used method to diagnose the disease.
– Small cavernous hemangiomas are mostly hyperechoic
nodules with clear boundary, while giant cavernous hemangiomas are mixed with hyperechoic and hypoechoic images.
• The typical enhancement feature of hemangioma in enhanced CT imaging is nodular or annular enhance­ment from the periphery, gradual expansion to the cen­ter, and iso-density or high-density lling in the delayed phase.
– However, there are also a few atypical hemangiomas,
which are signicantly enhanced in the arterial phase scan with high density, while in the portal phase and delayed phase scan with equal density [25].
6.3.3.3 Cavernous Hemangioma oftheLiver
• The disease is most common in adults aged 30–50 years.
• Most patients have no clinical symptoms. The develop­ment of tumor is slow and the course of disease can last for decades.
• On MRI, the most signicant feature of cavernous hem­angioma is hyperintensity on the T2-weighted image, showing “bulb sign.”
– If angioma has brosis or cystic change, the signal
intensity may be uneven.
6 Rare Malignant Liver Tumors
163
6.3.3.4 Hepatoadenoma
• Hepatoadenoma is a rare benign tumor in the liver, which is mostly seen in childbearing women.
• It is related to oral contraceptive.
• Hepatoadenoma is usually a single abundant blood supply lesion, often with capsule and intratumoral hemorrhage.
• Contrast enhanced CT showed signicant hyperenhance­ment in arterial phase and iso-density on the subsequent phase images.
• Hepatoadenoma can be isointense on T1-weighted image or a high signal caused by fat content, which greatly dif­fers in T2 signal image, and often show signal loss.
6.3.3.5 Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
• In the early stage of ICC, there was no obvious symptom, and the mass of liver was found by imaging when the liver function was abnormal.
– Even though the tumor size has reached 5–7cm, about
one-third patients have no clinical symptoms.
– Nonspecic symptoms include abdominal discomfort,
vomiting, night sweats, fatigue, and others.
• On B mode ultrasound, the typical ICC shows a heteroge­neous mass with irregular shape and unclear boundary, and dilated biliary ducts may also be seen. The blood ow of the artery with high resistance can be measured in the focus.
• The manifestation of ICC in CEUS is similar to that of HCC, which is “fast in and fast out,” but the elution time is earlier than HCC.
– The border of the tumor in portal stage is clearer than
that in the arterial stage, which is benecial to the observation of the lesion range.
• On plain CT scan, low-density intrahepatic mass without capsule, unclear margin, and uneven density are common manifestations.
• In dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, the enhancement degree of the ICC lesions depends on the local blood sup­ply, intra-lesion necrosis, and brosis degree.
– Small ICC might show hypervascular, which is similar
to HCC imaging features during arterial phase.
– Large ICC often shows peripheral rim-like hyperen-
hancement with a central area of low attenuation.
• Plenty of brous tissue in ICC and peripheral neovascu­larity results in delayed hyperenhancement in the portal venous phase.
• ICC shows low signal on T1-weighted image. On T2-weighted image, heterogenous mass of the peripheral shows high signal and central low signal [25].

6.3.4 Pathology

6.3.4.1 General Features
Microscopic pathology
• The microscopic characteristics of f-HCC are large eosin­ophils, prominent nucleoli, and intratumoral brosis [27].
– Under the microscope, the cancer cells were polygo-
nal, eosinophilic, and large nuclei. The tumor cells are large in size, nearly three times larger than the sur­rounding cells.
– The tumor cells are arranged into nests, and a large
number of parallel lamellar brous tissues appear between nests [26].
The lamellar brous tissue is arranged orderly, and the tumor cells are divided into strips or clusters, which have certain characteristics. Fibrous may merge and form a central scar.
Immunohistochemistry
• f-HCC often stains strongly for CK7, CD68, and epithe­lial membrane antigen [28].
• Laboratory tests showed that DCP, vitamin B12 receptor, and nervous tension value increased.
– Serum DCP was mostly used in the diagnosis and
monitoring of HCC. In 64–100% of patients with f-HCC, the level of serum DCP is increased.
• Immunohistochemical prole similar to that of hepatocel­lular carcinoma, such as positive staining for hepatocyte parafn 1 (HepPar1), glypican-3 (GPC3), arginase-1, polyclonal carcinoembryonic antigen (pCEA), and CD10 positivity [29].
Molecular genetics
• DNAJB1-PRKACA drives f-HCC tumorigenesis in greater than 95% of cases.
6.3.4.2 Staging, Grading, andClassication
Grade
– Grade I: Well differentiated – Grade II: Moderately differentiated – Grade III: Poorly differentiated – Grade IV: Undifferentiated; anaplastic
TNM staging
– T1: No vascular invasion – T2: Vascular invasion – T3: Invasion of a major branch of the portal or hepatic
vein
– T4: Invasion of adjacent organs
164
Q. Lu et al.
– N0: No local lymph node involvement – N1: Local lymph node involvement – M0: No metastasis – M1: Metastasis
Stage – Stage 1: A single tumor of any size and no vascular or
lymph nodes invasion
– Stage 2: Single tumor, less than 5cm in size, with vas-
cular invasion but no lymph node involvement
– Stage 3: Multiple tumors, tumors larger than 5cm and
involving major blood vessels or any T-phase and posi­tive lymph nodes
– Stage 4: Metastasis

6.3.5 Clinical Issues

6.3.5.1 Presentation
• f-HCC has a unique preference for adolescents and young
people, more women than men.
• The symptoms include abdominal pain or abdominal dis-
comfort in the upper right quadrant, nausea, weight loss, palpable abdominal mass, and hepatomegaly [29].
• f-HCC is usually single, with good differentiation and
slow growth.
• Incidence of lymph node involvement of f-HCC patients
is higher than that of HCC patients, which may be due to the large median tumor size. The diameter of the tumor is usually more than 10cm [28].
• All patients’ hematological studies and liver function
tests, including transaminase, bilirubin, and γ-glutamyltranspeptidase are within the normal range or slightly elevated levels.
• The level of tumor marker α-alpha fetoprotein (AFP) in
f-HCC patients is usually normal.
– In general, most tumor markers have no predictive
value for the diagnosis of f-HCC.
• Compared with HCC, 95% of f-HCC occurs in patients
without any signs of hepatitis, cirrhosis, or hepatic meta­bolic dysfunction [30].
• Distant metastasis is found in 20–30% of f-HCC. – Lung, peritoneum, and adrenal gland are the most
common sites.
giovascular invasion, nodule and distant metastasis, and integrity of resection [29].
– It has been reported that the initial tumor stage before
treatment is the most important determinant of prognosis. Patients in stage I-III tend to have a better prognosis than patients in stage IV.
• Long-term surveillance is essential because recurrence and death may occur several years after treatment [30].
6.3.5.3 Treatment
• Surgical resection is the main curative treatment for f-HCC.Complete periportal lymphadenectomy is recom­mended to patients of f-HCC with lymph node involve­ment [24].
• Liver transplantation is only considered in unresectable f-HCCs.
– As a result of extensive liver involvement, up to 30%
of cases are diagnosed without consideration of resection.
– There is little data on the outcome of liver transplanta-
tion in f-HCC patients. Studies have shown that liver transplantation can achieve good results in some f-HCC patients.
• Other therapies commonly used for HCCs, such as che­motherapy, external radiation therapies, or specic drugs, have proven ineffective for f-HCCs [23].
– For patients with advanced or recurrent invasive
f-HCC, chemotherapy with gemcitabine, cisplatin, 5-uorouracil, interferon, and oxaliplatin showed dif­ferent degrees of response.
– There was an attempt to reduce the tumor with radio-
active embolization before operation.
– A new targeted therapy, sorafenib, was evaluated retro-
spectively in f-HCC and showed limited efcacy.
• Other studies have shown that multimodal treatment, including resection, systemic chemotherapy, and radio­therapy, improves prognosis.

6.4 Hepatic Biliary Cystadenocarcinoma

YiDong, Jia-YingCao, and Wen-PingWang
6.3.5.2 Prognosis
• Despite the advanced stage, about 70% of f-HCC patients received surgical treatment, and the overall 5-year sur­vival rate was 70% [24].
– Patients who received lesions resection had better sur-
vival than those HCC patients.
• Although sex, tumor size, and atypia seem to be unrelated to survival, cirrhosis is recognized as a poor prognostic factor.
• Other prognostic factors include age, disease stage, diver­sity, tumor thrombosis, microvascular invasion, lymphan-

6.4.1 Terminology

Denitions
• HBCT derives from the biliary epithelium and usually grows within the liver tissue (85%) and occasionally within the extrahepatic biliary tract [31].
• HBCT is reported to represent only 5% of all cyst lesions in the liver but its actual incidence is likely much higher because of the misdiagnosis [32].
a
6 Rare Malignant Liver Tumors
165
• Mucinous cystic neoplasm, the unique subset within the hepatic cyst differential and including the subgroup of mucinous cystic neoplasm, is also referred to as hepatic biliary cystadenoma and HBCAC [33].
• HBCAC is mostly malignant transformed from the hepatic biliary cystadenoma and may also come from glands or pluripotent stem cells around the bile ducts [31].
• A malignant transformation rate of up to 30% has been reported, and HBCAC accounts for about 0.41% of malig­nant hepatic cystic tumor tumors [34, 35].

6.4.2 Imaging

6.4.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings
• HBCAC is a well-dened unilocular or multilocular cys­tic or cystic-solid lesion with mural or septal nodule and papillary projections.
• A nodule diameter >10 mm and the calcications along the wall and internal septum on conventional B mode ultrasound are suggestive of HBCAC (Fig.6.13a).
• A ductal dilatation upstream to cystic lesion may be seen in HBCAC (Fig.6.13b).
• HBCAC contains more solid components than HBCA (Fig.6.14a).
• Color Doppler imaging can detect rich blood ow in sep­tal nodules and cyst wall.
6.4.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings
• Presence of one or more of the following structures of HBCAC can be shown in contrast enhanced ultrasound: papillary projections, wall thickness irregularities, mural nodules, coarse calcications along the wall, and internal septations with nodular areas.
• HBCAC shows hyperenhancement or iso-enhancement of the cyst wall, internal septation, mural nodule, or solid component in arterial phase (Figs.6.13c, d and 6.14c, d).
b
c
Fig. 6.13 A case of hepatic biliary cystadenocarcinoma (HBCAC) lesion in a 77-year-old man. Several calcications can be detected inside the hypoechoic lesion (a). Dilated and twisted bile ducts can be observed beside the lesion (b). On contrast enhanced ultrasound, the irregular thickened cyst wall was observed hyperenhancement during
d
arterial phase (c, d) and rapid wash-out in portal venous phase (e). On MRI, the lesion exhibited low signal intensity on T1-weighted image (f) and heterogeneous high signal intensity on T2-weighted image (g). It showed heterogeneous peripheral enhancement in arterial phase of MRI, and continuous enhancement in portal venous and late phases
166
e
Q. Lu et al.
f
g
h
Fig. 6.13 (continued)
i
a
6 Rare Malignant Liver Tumors
167
• Hypoenhancement of the cystic wall, septations, and/or mural nodules during portal venous and late phases is the characteristic of HBCAC (Figs.6.13e and 6.14e, f).
6.4.2.3 CT Findings
• HBCAC appears as a well-dened, unilocular or multi­locular hypo-density mass, which has numerous internal septations in variable thickness.
• Tiny calcication along the internal septa and mural nod­ules is more often seen in HBCAC than in HBCA.
• Papillary excrescence, nodular thickening of internal septa, and mural nodules are signicant contrast enhancement in HBCAC after intravenous contrast administration.
6.4.2.4 MRI Findings
• HBCAC shows as cystic hypo-signal with internal septa­tions and uneven thickness of cysts, nodular, or papillary soft tissue signal intensity in the cyst wall on T1-weighted images.
• HBCAC is mainly hypersignal on T2-weighted images with internal septations, mural nodules, and soft tissues showing as hypo-signal.
• With the difference in the presence of solid components, protein content and hemorrhage, the internal uid within the HBCAC lesion can show varied signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted images.
• The surface of the nodules was non-smooth or papillary in MRI images.
• Internal septa, mural nodules, and soft tissues in the arte­rial phase of the enhanced scan are signicantly enhanced, and the enhancement of portal and delayed phase are still signicant.
• Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) images show hyperintense multilocular cystic mass, the biliary tree and possibly a ductal dilatation upstream to cystic lesion.
• Mural nodules were several lling defects in HBCAC on MRCP images. A ductal dilatation upstream to cystic lesion is more often seen in HBCAC than in HBCA.
6.4.2.5 Other Imaging Findings
• PET/CT
– F-18 FDG PET/CT demonstrates intense uptake in the
marginal parenchymal region of the HBCAC.
b
c
Fig. 6.14 A hepatic biliary cystadenocarcinoma (HBCAC) lesion with honeycomb septa hyperenhancement. An anechoic lesion with multiple hyperechoic septa could be found on B mode ultrasound (a). No color ow signal could be detected in the lesion (b). On contrast enhanced
d
ultrasound, the lesion showed a rapid hyperenhancement of the honey­comb septa during arterial phase (c, d), and hypoenhancement of septa during portal venous and late phases (e, f)