Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5762_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
79 Мб
Скачать
230
a
H. Han et al.
b
c
Fig. 10.2 Common hepatic artery aneurysm. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) clearly demonstrated an aneurysm at the common hepatic artery (a). Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) conrmed an aneurysm located at the common hepatic artery, with gastroduodenal artery branches lying anterior to the aneurysm (b). After hepatic artery aneurysm embolization, superior mesenteric artery angiography

10.5 Pathology

showed that the aneurysm and common hepatic artery had been com­pletely embolized with no extravasation, and the left and right hepatic arteries are supplied by gastroduodenal artery (c). (LHA left hepatic artery, RHA right hepatic artery, HA hepatic artery, GDA gastroduode­nal artery, SMA superior mesenteric artery)
• The causes of HAA include:
– Atherosclerosis, media degeneration, arterial brodys-

10.5.1 General Features

plasia, vasculitis;
– Iatrogenic causes from surgical, endoscopic, or radio-
• The incidence of visceral aneurysms in vascular diseases is 1–2%. Hepatic artery aneurysms account for 12–20%
logically interventional procedures.
– Trauma, inammation, and infection.
of visceral aneurysms, second to splenic aneurysms.
• The vast majority of hepatic aneurysms are isolated, accounting for 90% and extrahepatic aneurysms are com­mon, with a male-to-female ratio of 2:1.
Atherosclerosis is the most common cause of extrahepatic artery aneurysms, and blunt or penetrating trauma are com­mon cause of intrahepatic artery aneurysms.
10 Hepatic Artery Aneurysm
231
10.5.2 Staging, Grading, andClassication
• Base on the origin of aneurysm, it can be categorized as common, left and right hepatic artery aneurysm.
– Common hepatic artery aneurysms are the most com-
mon, accounting for 63%.
– Followed by the right hepatic artery aneurysm,
accounting for 28%. – Left hepatic artery aneurysm is accounting for 5%. – About 4% of patients with both left and right hepatic
arteries involved.
• Hepatic artery aneurysms are classied as extrahepatic aneurysms or intrahepatic aneurysms according to intra­or extrahepatic occurrence.
• Approximately 75–80% of hepatic artery aneurysms are extrahepatic.
• Hepatic artery aneurysms can be distinguished as true aneurysm, pseudoaneurysm, and dissecting aneurysm according to the existence of intact three layers of arterial wall.

10.6 Clinical Issues

10.6.1 Presentation

• About 75% of hepatic artery aneurysms are found inci­dentally and have no symptoms [5].
• The clinical manifestations of hepatic artery aneurysms are usually nonspecic, and epigastric pain is the most common symptom.
• The triad presentation of HAA rupture consists of abdomi­nal pain, obstructive jaundice, and hemorrhage. Hypovolemic shock may occur with massive hemorrhage.

10.6.2 Prognosis

• Hepatic artery aneurysms have a 20–30% risk of rupture and rupture being associated with a 35% mortality.
• It is suggested that pregnancy, increasing in size and diameter larger than 2cm are risks for rupture of hepatic artery aneurysms.
• Non-atherosclerotic hepatic artery aneurysms carry a higher risk of rupture than those with atherosclerosis.

10.6.3 Treatment

• Because of the high mortality rate associated with rupture of hepatic artery aneurysm, it is suggested that therapeu­tic plans should be created timely once they are detected, no matter there are symptoms or not [6].
• HAA can be treated by surgical or endovascular treat­ments [7].
• Surgical methods consist of ligation, excision, venous grafting, and hepatectomy.
Endovascular approaches comprise aneurysm emboliza-
tion with coils and stent placement [8].
The choice of treatment for HAA depends on the size and
location of the aneurysm, as well as the presence of hepatic collateral circulation and patient clinical status [9, 10].

References

1. Kim JH, Rha SE, Chun HJ, Kim YS, Oh SN, Lee YJ, Byun JY, etal.
Giant aneurysm of the common hepatic artery: US and CT imaging ndings. Abdom Imaging. 2010;35:212–4.
2. Palubinskas S, Rasmussen SL. Hepatic artery aneurysm causing
gastrointestinal haemorrhage – Case report and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;41:12–6.
3. Warshauer DM, Keefe B, Mauro MA. Intrahepatic hepatic artery
aneurysm: computed tomography and color-ow Doppler ultra­sound ndings. Gastrointest Radiol. 1991;16:175–7.
4. Durkin N, Deganello A, Sellars ME, Sidhu PS, Davenport M,
Makin E.Post-traumatic liver and splenic pseudoaneurysms in chil­dren: diagnosis, management, and follow-up screening using con­trast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51:289–92.
5. Nathan DP, Wang GJ, Woo EY, Fairman RM, Jackson BM.Open
and endovascular repair of hepatic artery aneurysm: two case reports and review of the literature. Vascular. 2011;19:42–6.
6. Abbas MA, Fowl RJ, Stone WM, Panneton JM, Oldenburg WA,
Bower TC, Cherry KJ, etal. Hepatic artery aneurysm: factors that predict complications. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:41–5.
7. Bacalbasa N, Brezean I, Anghel C, Barbu I, Pautov M, Balescu I,
Brasoveanu V.Successful resection and vascular ligation of a large hepatic artery aneurysm– A case report and literature review. In Vivo. 2017;31:979–82.
8. Hashim A, Allaqaband S, Bajwa T.Leaking hepatic artery aneu-
rysm successfully treated with covered stent. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;74:500–5.
9. Schick C, Ritter RG, Balzer JO, Thalhammer A, Vogl TJ.Hepatic
artery aneurysm: treatment options. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:157–9.
10. Jones VS, Chennapragada MS, Lord DJ, Stormon M, Shun A.Post-
liver transplant mycotic aneurysm of the hepatic artery. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43:555–8.

Peliosis Hepatis

YiDong, FengMao, andWen-PingWang
11

11.1 Terminology

• Peliosis hepatis (PH) is a rare benign vasogenic lesion characterized by the presence of cystic blood-lled cavi­ties distributed randomly throughout the liver parenchyma.
• PH was rst reported in the German literature in 1861 by Wagner, and named by Schoenlank in 1916.
• “Peliosis” is a term derived from the Greek pelios, which means “dusky” or “purple,” referring to the color of the liver parenchyma with peliosis.
• The size of the lesion may vary from 1 mm to several centimeters.

11.2 Imaging

11.2.1 Conventional Ultrasound Findings

• Conventional B mode ultrasound shows homogeneous hypoechoic lesion in liver without cirrhosis, and hetero­geneously hypoechoic lesions if complicated by hemor­rhage. The lesion always lacks of volume effect (Fig.11.1).
• The lesion might be single or multiple, always be detected incidentally.
• Color ow imaging can show color ow signals both inside the lesion and in the surrounding area of the lesion.

11.2.2 Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Findings

• Only a few cases of peliosis hepatis have been described using CEUS.
Y. Dong (*) · F. Mao · W.-P. Wang Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China e-mail: dong.yi@zs-hospital.sh.cn; mao.feng@zs-hospital.sh.cn
• Consistent with radiological performance, a typical target sign enhancement, e.g., an early arterial-phase contrast accumulation in the center of the lesion with a centrifugal lling and a homogeneous enhancement in late phase was detected by CEUS (Fig.11.2).
• In other cases, a peripheral ring enhancement could be observed in arterial phase with centripetal lling and homogeneous hyperenhancement in late phase (Figs.11.3 and 11.4).

11.2.3 CT Findings

• CT ndings vary with the size of masses, presence or absence of thrombus within the cavities, and presence of hemorrhage.
– Peliosis lesions could usually be observed as multiple
areas of low attenuation on unenhanced CT.
– In particular, peliosis lesions may appear spontane-
ously hyperattenuating in certain patients (probably related to intralesional hemorrhage).
– Additional, when peliosis cavities are smaller than
1cm in diameter, the lesions could not be detected and CT ndings may be normal.
– Calcications within peliosis lesions have also been
described.
• On contrast-enhanced CT, typical peliosis lesions show early arterial-phase globular enhancement and multiple small, central accumulations of contrast material, with a centrifugal progression of enhancement in portal venous phase.
– The enhancement pattern varies, depending on the
freshness of the blood that lls the peliosis cavities. Fresh blood is associated with marked hyperenhance­ment, whereas retention of old blood is associated with little or nonenhancement.
– In addition, some lesions were described with a cen-
tripetal enhancement mimicking hepatic hemangio-
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021 W.-P. Wang et al. (eds.), Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Hepatic Neoplasms,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1761-4_11
233
234
a
a
b
Fig. 11.1 Different kinds of echogenicity of peliosis hepatis lesions, including hypoechoic (a) and isoechoic (b)
b
Y. Dong et al.
c
d
Fig. 11.2 A case of peliosis hepatis with target sign enhancement on contrast enhanced ultrasound. B mode ultrasound revealed a slightly hyperechoic focal lesion (arrow) in right lobe of liver (a). The lesion
showed centrifugal lling hyperenhancement during arterial phase (b– e). In portal venous and late phases, the lesion showed isoenhancement (f, g)
11 Peliosis Hepatis
g
235
fe
Fig. 11.2 (continued)
mas or with atypical enhancement patterns, which were not suggestible for any typical hepatic tumor type.
– In delayed phase, late diffuse homogeneous hyperat-
tenuation can be observed in the phlebectatic type of peliosis hepatis (because of the lack of hemorrhagic parenchymal necrosis).
– In some instances, small peliosis lesions (<2cm) may
also show hyperattenuation in both arterial and portal venous phases.
– If there is thrombosis, a non-enhancing nodule will be
seen within the lesion.

11.2.4 MRI Findings

• On MR examination, the signal intensities of the lesions largely depend on the age and status of the blood component.
– PH lesions may appear hypointense on T1WI for sub-
acute hemorrhage, and hyperintense on T2WI, which is suggestive of the presence of hemorrhagic necrosis.
– The signal intensity features on DWI and the ADC val-
ues on the ADC maps of focal peliosis hepatis are also variable and nonspecic, probably due to its content, including different degrees of thrombus and hemorrhage.
– Although peliosis hepatis is benign, ADC values are
lower than normal hepatic parenchyma, probably due to its content including thrombus and hemorrhage.
– Both uid–uid levels and low ADC values are related
to old and new blood products in the lesions on MR images.
• On T1WI after contrast material injection, peliosis lesions usually show typical centrifugal enhancement similar to CT appearance.
– In other cases, the lesions could be observed progres-
sive centripetal enhancement with restricted diffusion
236
a
fe
Y. Dong et al.
b
c
d
g
Fig. 11.3 A case of peliosis hepatis with centripetal lling enhance­ment on CEUS.B mode ultrasound revealed a hypoechoic focal lesion near the surface of right hepatic lobe (a). Color ow signals could be detected in the peripheral area of the lesion (b). Arterial Doppler spec-
trum with resistance index (RI) as 0.61 was measured (c). The lesion showed a peripheral rim-like enhancement and centripetal lling imme­diately during arterial phase (d–f). The lesion showed homogeneous hyperenhancement in the late phase (g)
ab
cd
fe
11 Peliosis Hepatis
237
g
Fig. 11.4 A case of peliosis hepatis with iso-enhancement in arterial phase of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). B mode ultrasound image revealed a heterogeneous hypoechoic lesion in right lobe of liver
(a). Color ow signals could be detected inside the lesion (b). On CEUS, the lesion showed complete isoenhancement during arterial phase (c–e). It was detected slightly wash-out in portal venous and late phases (f, g)
238
Y. Dong et al.
that was unusual and can lead to puzzling in differenti­ating the lesion from hemangioma or malignancy.
– An enhancing rim may be revealed in cystic cavities
that represent a hematoma.
– Both hemorrhagic parenchymal necrosis and throm-
bosed cavities could be observed as non-enhanced areas.

11.2.5 Other Imaging Findings

• On angiography, peliosis lesions could be detected as multiple vascular nodules (i.e., accumulations of contrast material) in late arterial phase. Typical enhancement of peliosis lesions is more distinct in parenchymal phase and persists during portal venous phase.
• If PH was just a blood-lled cyst without any inamma­tory focus or malignant transformation, 18F-FDG PET/ CT would reveal PH lesions isometabolic with surround­ing hepatic parenchyma. Otherwise, PH might show increased 18F-FDG uptake with cholestasis, hepatic fail­ure, hemorrhagic necrosis or clumps of microorganisms (Bartonella henselae or B. quintana) that may present with lymphadenopathy.
11.3 Dierential Diagnosis

11.3.1 Hepatic Adenoma

• Similar to peliosis, hepatic adenoma might also be associ­ated with the long-term use of estrogens.
• In the case of diffuse peliosis hepatis, the differential diagnosis is relatively easy.
• In addition, the presence of fat in some adenomas could be used as a sign to make a differential diagnosis.
• However, in certain instances, it is difcult to differentiate focal peliosis from adenomas. In these patients, biopsy is often required to reach a denitive diagnosis.

11.3.2 Hemangioma

• Opposite of peliosis hepatis, the typical enhancement pat­tern of hemangiomas is peripheral ring, or globular enhancement with centripetal progression. Therefore, dif­ferential diagnosis can be achieved in most patients.
• In addition, hemangiomas may be rather large lesions with a mass effect on the hepatic vessels, while there is usually no mass effect on hepatic vessels in peliosis lesions.

11.2.6 Best Imaging Protocol Advices

• The variable imaging ndings of peliosis hepatis depend on the pathologic patterns of disease, various degrees of the blood component of the lesions, and concomitant hepatic steatosis.
• In review of some literatures, whether in dynamic MRI/CT or CEUS, the enhancement patterns of PH lesion in arterial phase could be divided into two categories: quick hyperen­hancement type whether presented with globular enhance­ment or central enhancement, homogeneously or heterogeneously; and mild iso/hypo-enhancement type.
• Meanwhile, both types showed a tendency of homogeneous enhancement in the late phase in dynamic MRI/CT while gradually becoming hypoechoic in delayed phase in CEUS.
• Fresh and actively circulating blood within the dilated sinusoid could result in hyperenhancement in arterial phase of dynamic CT or MRI, whereas old and stagnated blood within the peliosis hepatis could cause persistently low or slow centripetal enhancement in portal or delayed phase.
• Nevertheless, the diagnosis of atypical lesions often remains problematic, so percutaneous liver biopsy is more reliable to establish a denite diagnosis, but the bleeding risk should be considered.

11.3.3 Focal Nodular Hyperplasia

• Typically homogeneously hyperattenuating masses on the arterial phase, focal nodular hyperplasia is isoattenuation on the portal venous and delayed phases.
• Often with a central scar with low attenuation on the arte­rial and portal venous phases, these lesions has enhance­ment on the delayed phase images.
• On color Doppler ultrasound, FNH was characterized by the presence of abundant blood ow signals exhibiting dendritic and spoke-wheel patterns.
• The most common arterial enhancement pattern on CEUS was centrifugal or homogeneous enhancement in FNH.
• Atypical forms of focal nodular hyperplasia may not show the characteristic enhancement patterns and the cen­tral scar just described, however, and thus pose some problems in the differential diagnosis with peliosis hepatis.

11.3.4 Hepatic Abscess

• It is important to differentially diagnose peliosis hepatis and hepatic abscess, to avoid the percutaneous drainage
11 Peliosis Hepatis
239
of peliosis lesions, which can be dangerous and even fatal.
• With regard to imaging criteria, a pyogenic abscess usu­ally presents as a mass with a multiseptated or cluster-of­grapes appearance with non-enhancing contents.

11.3.5 Hypervascular Metastases

• Although mild hyperattenuating in the delayed phase can be shown in some hypervascular metastases with brotic change, hypervascular metastases are usually totally hypo- or isoattenuation in the delayed phase of contrast enhancement because of the rapid wash-out of contrast material.
• In general, peliosis lesions are rarely confused with hypervascular metastases.

11.3.6 Hepatocellular Carcinoma

• With rapid wash-out in the portal venous phase, hepatocel­lular carcinoma is usually hyperattenuating in the arterial phase, and iso- or hypoattenuation in the delayed phase.
• Although rare, it was reported the possibility that peliosis hepatis may mimic the presence of hypervascular hepato­cellular carcinoma in the literature. In these patients, biopsy is often necessary to reach a denitive diagnosis.

11.3.7 Arteriovenous Malformations

• The appearance on conventional angiography differs from that of arteriovenous malformations.

11.4 Pathology

11.4.1 General Features

• Microscopically, blood-lled cysts and hemorrhagic necrosis were observed, and the adjacent peliosis spaces had no endothelial lining, which are important pathologi­cal characteristics of PH.
• Pathologists classied two types of PH for different causes of this rupture: phlebectatic type associated with the intrinsic weakness of the bers of endothelial wall; parenchymal type associated with focal hepatocyte necrosis.
• The pathogenesis of peliosis hepatis remains unclear. The possible mechanisms include:
– Congenital malformation, vascular varicosity with or
without prior angitis.
– Hepatocellular necrosis leading to cavity formation. – Outow obstruction at sinusoidal level and central
vein of the hepatic lobule.
– Rupture of reticular ber, thus resulted in sinusoidal
dilation.
– Breakdown of sinusoidal borders and increased endo-
thelial cell permeability with numerous red blood cells in the space of Disse.
• In immunohistochemistry, the lesion is shown to be nega­tive for CD31, CD34, CD117, DOG-1, PCK, EMA, HMB45, and F8in the sinusoidal dilation area, but it was positive in the normal sinusoidal area.

11.5 Clinical Issues

11.5.1 Presentation

• The pathogenesis of PH remains unknown, and its patho­genic factors vary. They can be divided into three catego­ries: drug-related, autoimmune, and infectious roughly.
– PH has been associated with the use of hormones and
immunosuppressive medications, especially α-alkyl steroid hormones and thiopurin.
– Autoimmune factors are those associated with second-
ary immunodeciency result from certain potential consumptive diseases, for example, tuberculosis, hematological malignancies, acquired immunode­ciency syndrome, immune deciency after transplan­tation, and hepatocellular carcinoma.
– Infectious factors include Bartonella infection, which
leads to cat-scratch disease. PH has also been observed in dogs infected with Bartonella.
• One or several factors may cause hepatocyte necrosis which then leads to the formation of cysts; in addition, the dysfunctional endothelial cells in the hepatic sinus may lead to angiectasis and hyperemia, the formation of mass blood-lled cysts in the hepatic parenchyma.
• Microscopically, there exist two types of peliosis: “paren­chymal peliosis” and “phlebectatic peliosis,” the main dif­ference being whether the cavities are lined by endothelium or brotic tissue.
– The characteristics of the parenchymal pattern are
irregular blood-lled spaces, lined by brous tissue rather than the endothelium, which neither communi­cate with the central veins nor compress adjacent parenchymal cells. Instead, there are associations between many areas of focal necrosis in the surround­ing hepatic tissue and them.
– The second morphological type is the phlebectatic pat-
tern, showing minimal hepatocyte necrosis. The regu­larly spherical, centrilobular blood-lled spaces are lined by endothelial cells and/or brotic tissue and
240
Y. Dong et al.
freely communicate with hepatic sinusoids. As an inte­gral part of the central vein, they cause compression of the adjacent parenchymal cells, and contain mural brin clots.
• Patients may be asymptomatic or present with hypody­namia, cholestasis, hepatomegaly, portal hypertension, ascites, liver failure, hepatic encephalopathy, or fatal intraperitoneal hemorrhage.
• Severe abdominal pain may be related to rupture and intraperitoneal hemorrhage.
• In the case of bacillary peliosis, the typical ndings are lymphadenopathy with B. henselae and neurologic symp­toms with B. quintana.
• Peliosis hepatis can occur at any age and sex.

11.5.2 Prognosis

• After drug withdrawal, the natural course of peliosis hepatis is regression, cessation of steroid therapy, or reso­lution of associated infectious disease.
• A pseudotumoral and hemorrhagic evolution has also been described.
• Complications include portal hypertension, liver failure, and liver rupture leading to hemoperitoneum or shock.

11.5.3 Treatment

• Patient with ruptured lesion or suspected bleeding should be treated promptly with transcatheter super-selective embolization or even surgical hemostasis if necessary.
• If conservative treatment proved to be inefcient, or tumor growth was detected during monitoring, surgery is an effective way to prevent associated complications.
• In severe cases, liver transplantation would be the last resort for life saving.
• If the cause is unknown or conservative treatment is ineffective, surgery should be performed. Surgery is the most effective treatment for the prevention of massive hemorrhage caused by lesion rupture, and hepatic failure.
• In HIV-related peliosis hepatis caused by B. henselae, clinical improvement has been documented with the use of antibiotics (i.e., erythromycin) [13].

References

1. Loizides A, Glodny B, Zoller H, Zelger BG, Junker D, Henninger B, Putzer D, etal. Contrast enhanced ultrasound of a rare case of Peliosis hepatis. Med Ultrason. 2017;19:114–6.
2. Kim SH, Lee JM, Kim WH, Han JK, Lee JY, Choi BI.Focal peliosis hepatis as a mimicker of hepatic tumors: radiological-pathological correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007;31:79–85.
3. Battal B, Akgun V, Sari S.Peliosis hepatis: one pathology, a thou­sand faces, and a clinical and radiological diagnostic challenge. J Dig Dis. 2014;15:281–2.
• In those who had a medical history of possible etiologies, treating the cause is expected to have lesion resolved (e.g., infection and related drug practice).