Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5184_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
85 Мб
Скачать
236
ab
L. Yavi ch
a b
Fig. 30 Patient’s comparative images of the upper and lower occlusal views before (a) and (b) after completion of the rst- and the second-phase treatment
Fig. 31 Comparative panoramic radiographs: (a) before treatment and (b) after completion of the three-dimensional orthodontics
a
b
TMJ Pathology Treatment
237
ab c
Fig. 32 Comparative lateral radiographs of the patient: (a) at the beginning of the treatment in habitual occlusion, (b) after the completion of the three-dimensional orthodontic, and (c) 6years after treatment conclusion
ab
Fig. 33 Patient’s kinesiographic records’ comparison: before and after the two phases of orthodontic treatment
238
L. Yavi ch
a
b
c
Fig. 34 Patient’s electromyography comparison: (a) before, (b) during the rst phase with the orthotic, and (c) after the completion of the orthodontic treatment
ab
TMJ Pathology Treatment
Fig. 35 Patient’s kinesiographic records’ comparison after electronically mandibular deprogramming (a) before treat- ment and (b) after treatment
239
Fig. 36 Threshold tonal audiometry 6years after the completion of the two phases of TMJ treatment
240
L. Yavi ch

4 Case 3

4.1 Mandible Condyle Fracture
Consolidation by Neuromuscular andPhysiological Alignment oftheSegments, 4Months After Unsuccessful Surgery
A 57-year-old male patient was referred by his dentist. His principal complaints were lack of strength when chewing, difculty in opening the mouth, cervical pain, pain in the TMJs, and ring­ing in the left ear. History revealed that the patient fell in the bathroom 4months before the consul­tation, hitting his jaw and fracturing his mandi­ble. He was subsequently submitted to surgery for a fracture of the symphysis and the left man­dibular condyle (Fig.37). Upon physical exami­nation, there were no obvious ndings, a panoramic radiograph was ordered, and a non­union of the left condyle was observed.
In the patient’s panoramic radiograph, one can see asymmetric mandibular condyles and a radi­opaque image compatible with an osteosynthesis wire in the lower region of condylar on the left side with bone fragment displacement (Fig.38). In the region of the chin on the right, a horizontal
radiopaque image compatible with an osteosyn­thesis device for repair of the fracture of the ante­rior symphysis can be seen. Dental abnormalities included missing dentition and a posterior open bite on the left side (Fig.39).
A CT was ordered (Figs.40 and 41). The sur­face electromyographic record before electronic deprogramming showed the right and left mas­seter muscles, the right trapezius muscle, and the right digastric muscle with elevated activity at rest. The activity of most of these muscles lowered after electronic deprogramming (Fig.42). Based on the case history and its clini­cal and radiographic features, this case was diag­nosed as a nonunion fracture of the left mandibular condyle.
Nonunion is a complication in mandibular fractures. The causative factors include delay in treatment, infection, inadequate immobilization, and improper internal xation. Furthermore, a concomitant infection may be present. Other sus­pected contributory factors included a failure to receive antibiotics, delay in treatment, teeth in the fracture line, alcohol and drug abuse, inexpe­rience of the surgeon, and lack of patient compli­ance. Generally, treatment of nonunion consists of standard techniques of debridement, antibiotic therapy, and further immobilization. We referred
Fig. 37 Patient’s panoramic radiograph on the day of consultation showing a nonunion of the left condyle (arrow)
TMJ Pathology Treatment
Fig. 38 Magnication of the left mandibular condyle on the panoramic radiograph demonstrating attempted wire synthesis
the patient back to the surgeon where a new sur­gical procedure was proposed. The patient refused to undergo another surgical procedure.
Considering the patient’s refusal of revision surgery, a conservative approach was then pro­posed. The patient was informed about possible limitations due to his age. Ultralow-frequency and low-amplitude transcutaneous electrical neu­ral stimulation (TENS) of the mandibular divi­sion of the trigeminal nerve (V) was used to relax the masticatory muscles to record the rest posi­tion of the mandible. The mandibular rest posi­tion was recorded after electronic deprogramming, together with the information from the MRI to orient bite registration, and a three-dimensional orthotic was fabricated (Fig.43). The patient had
241
a pathological free space of 6.4mm and 4.3mm of mandibular retro-position. This tridimensional mandible rest position was recorded in the form of a bite occlusal registration, which was later used to construct an orthotic (Fig. 44). This removable mandibular appliance must be worn during the day and night. This intraoral appliance tested by electromyography and kinesiographi­cally supports the neuromuscular physiological position. The patient was asked to wear the intra­oral appliance full-time and to remove it only for cleaning. The dynamic evaluations improved, and the patient felt no more pain or chewing dif­culty. During the treatment, new orthotics in neuromuscular physiological position were con­structed (Fig.45).
A second panoramic radiograph was taken after 3months. The new panoramic radiograph (Fig.46b) showed an improvement in the con­dyle position. Finally, 4months after the second panoramic radiograph, a third image (Fig.46c) was ordered where union of the fracture was demonstrated. These images show (a) the day of the rst consultation with the habitual occlu­sion; (b) 3months later with the rst orthotic; and (c) 7months after the rst consultation with a new orthotic; an improvement of condyle position and the bone union can clearly be seen. It is important to note the changes not only in the images but also in the occlusion with the orthotics as the muscles adjust to a more physi­ological position. A new CT was ordered (Fig. 47) and clearly showed the union of the fracture without subjecting the patient to a sec­ond surgery and without using any maxilloman­dibular xation (MMF).
Fractures of the mandibular condyle are one of the most commonly occurring mandibular fractures. Management of these fractures has always been a controversial issue. One of the complications of mandibular condyle fracture is nonunion. Fractures, where the muscles tend to draw fragments together, are more favorable than those fractures where the muscles tend to draw fragments apart. The distraction of fracture fragments is observed in many mandibular con­dyle fractures. The most observed type is the dis­placement of the condyle head to the anteromedial
242
Fig. 39 Patient’s habitual occlusion on the day of consultation
Fig. 40 CT sagittal slices conrming the nonunion of the mandibular condyle fracture 4months after surgery
L. Yavi ch
Fig. 41 3D reconstruction showing nonunion of the mandibular condyle fracture 4months after surgery
side because of lateral pterygoid muscle action. The ability to place the mandible in a spatial rela­tionship by measuring the masticatory muscles at
their resting length can be an important auxiliary tool to assist in the rehabilitation of condylar fractures.
TMJ Pathology Treatment
a
b
243
Fig. 42 Comparative rest electromyography (a) before and (b) after electronic deprogramming
Fig. 43 Graphic record of the mandible tridimensional position after electronic deprogramming
244
Fig. 44 First orthotic constructed in a neuromuscular and physiological position
Fig. 45 Second orthotic constructed in a neuromuscular and physiological position
ab c
L. Yavi ch
ab c
Fig. 46 Comparative images of the rst (a), second (b), and third (c) left condyle on the section of the panoramic radiographs
TMJ Pathology Treatment
Fig. 47 CT sagittal slices conrming the union of the mandibular condyle fracture following treatment
245

5 Case 4

5.1 Patient withAutoimmune Disease andaCompressive Noninammatory TMJ Pathology
A 40-year-old female patient, with a diagnosis of seronegative spondyloarthropathy, later diag­nosed as ankylosing spondylitis, came to the clinic referred to by her rheumatologist. The patient was complaining of intense pain of the TMJ, dysesthesias of the head, and mouth open­ing limitation. Seronegative spondyloarthropa­thies refer to a group of diseases that share common characteristics including the occurrence of inammation in the spine, peripheral joints, and, in various peri-articular tissues, entheses (where tendons and ligaments insert onto bones). The outstanding feature of seronegative spondy­loarthropathies is the absence of rheumatoid fac­tor and autoantibodies in the laboratory tests. Seronegative spondyloarthropathies have a strong association with human leukocyte antigen HLA-B27. The patient reported that she had been diagnosed at age 39 with arthritis when all her major joints, such as the knee and elbow, on the left side suddenly became inamed. Swelling, redness, and intense pain prevented her from per­forming simple movements such as standing and extending her arm.
When she started to feel pain in the TMJ, she consulted an orthodontist and facial orthopedist who informed her that she had “bruxism” and that she needed to use a device to place her tongue in the correct position. She wore the appliance for a month, and then her TMJ locked. She could not
open her mouth and felt an extreme pain in her entire head. At this point, she no longer knew what hurt more, the joints of the body or her head and mouth. She stressed that there was no medi­cation that could ease the pain she felt in the TMJ and in the cervical spine. Her rheumatologist was apprehensive that she could have arthritis in the TMJ and immediately referred her.
She reported clicking on the right TMJ, dif­culty opening the mouth, difculty and pain with chewing, and bruxism. She also felt strong head­aches, neck pain, pain in the right eyebrow, pain behind the eyes, pain in the right shoulder, and pain in both temporomandibular joints, stronger in the right joint (Figs. 48 and 49). In the rst consultation, the patient reported that she had ini­tiated treatment for bruxism and that upon her orthotic being changed, she began to feel a very intense pain and her mouth locked.
The radiographic image of the joint (Figs.50 and 51) shows the superior and posterior posi­tioning of the articular process on the left side (highlighted in red) in the joint cavity when the jaw is in maximal intercuspation. In the maxi­mum opening position, there is a attening of the posterior and anterior surface of the left mandib­ular condyle process (highlighted in red) and a attening of the superior and anterior surface of the right mandibular condyle process (high­lighted in blue). The right side also presents an alteration of the growth axis of the mandibular condyle.
Opening and closing computerized kinesio­graphic records show that the patient can open only 32mm, which is a signicant limitation. The skull model image shows the difference in the translation of the mandibular condyles