Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5184_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
85 Мб
Скачать
Arthrocentecis andArthroscopy
AnisTebyanian

1 Introduction

TMJ disorders and associated pain and dysfunc­tion are increasingly prevalent in the modern age, largely due to parafunctional habits such as brux­ism. These habits stem from psychological stress­ors and manifest physically through unconscious clenching and grinding of the teeth. The substan­tial masticatory force exerted during these actions can have detrimental effects on the related mus­cles and the TMJ itself, leading to pain, limited mouth opening, and inability to chew food prop­erly. These symptoms can signicantly impact one’s quality of life, causing discomfort and dif­culty in performing daily activities related to eating and speaking. Other causes of TMD are trauma, arthritis, dentofacial deformity all of which can result in alteration or destruction of TMJ and related structures.
1.1 Internal derangement of TMJ
Refers to abnormal position of the articular disk in relation to the condylar head within the glenoid fossa. This condition is considered a progressive disorder with symptoms that can vary depending on the severity of the derangement. As the internal
A. Tebyanian (*) Olney Center for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Olney, MD, USA e-mail: dr.tebyanian@olneyoralfacialsurgery.com
derangement (ID) progresses, several changes can occur including posterior ligament elongation, disk deformation or perforation, and complete displacement of the disc out of glenoid fossa.
The most famous classication system for internal derangement is Wilkes classication and shows ve stages of disease progression based on clinical, radiographic, and pathological features.
There are several treatment modalities avail­able for TMJ disorders, and the choice of treat­ment depends on the severity and specic symptoms experienced by the patient. Here is a review of ofce-based Arthrocentesis and a brief overview of Arthroscopy.
(A) Arthrocentesis is a minimally invasive pro-
cedure that can be safely performed in ofce setting for the treatment of symptomatic internal derangements such as disc dis­placement without reduction. Arthrocentesis has shown successful results in treating patients with Wilkes classication of I–III (Fig.1). This procedure involves irrigation and lavage of the joint to reduce inamma­tory mediators responsible for pain and to break soft adhesions that limit the mobility of the disc.
(B) Arthroscopy is similar to arthrocentesis, but
the scope provides direct visualization of the joint structures like the medial synovial drape, pterygoid shadow, retro-discal synovium, articular disc, and anterior recess. Studies have demonstrated that arthroscopy
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024 B. C. Stack Jr. et al. (eds.), Craniofacial Pain, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57563-1_9
151
152
A. Tebyanian
Stage I Painless clicking, no restriction on opening
Stage II
Stage III
Stage IV Chronic pain, restricted motion, locking, crepitus
Stage V
Fig. 1 Wilkes classication. (Adapted from Wilkes CH.Internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint: patho­logical variations. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:469–7)
First few episodes of pain, Temporal headache,
increase in clicking intensity
Multiple episodes of pain, Restricted motion,
headache, Locking, pain with function
Chronic variable pain, crepitus, grinding, grating,
chronic restriction on motion, and function
Slight anterior disc displacement with
reduction
Mild to moderate anterior disc
displacement with reduction, Slight
deformity of the disk
Moderate to severe anterior disc
displacement without reduction,
oderate disc deformity, no changes in
bony contours
Significant disc deformity and
displacement, moderate
changes in osseous contour
Gross deformity of disc and osseous
anatomy, osteophyte formation
is more effective than arthrocentesis in lys­ing adhesions and increasing joint mobility.
There are three levels of arthroscopic proce­dures performed based on initial diagnosis and operator skill level.
Level I is arthrocentesis with visual diagnos-
tics. It uses a single puncture entry for the
scope and one anterior needle for outow of
the irrigant. Once the scope is inside the joint,
a systematic sweep from anterior to posterior
recess will readily show the anatomy and
involved pathology of the joint for proper
diagnosis. The rest of the procedure is similar
to arthrocentesis (Fig.2).
Level II uses two puncture points, one for
thescope and the other for a working cannula.
The working cannula port will allow lasers,
coblation, rotary instruments, and other
mechanical instruments to reduce and better
mobilize the disc and break the more promi­nent adhesions.
Level III, also called advanced or operative arthroscopy, is more surgically invasive and uses two or more puncture points to use can­nulas along with the scope to perform endo­scopic debridement, myotomy of lateral pterygoid muscle for anterior release of the disc, disc reduction, and rigid disc xation. Advanced arthroscopy is a very sensitive tech­nique and requires further training enabling clinicians to perform open surgical procedures endoscopically (Fig.3).
Arthrocentesis involves ushing and irrigat-
ing the superior joint space to push the disc apart from the glenoid fossa, remove inamma­tory byproducts and debris, and improve joint mobility by breaking down adhesions. While it may not be suitable for advanced cases, it serves as a preferred initial surgical option for the
Arthrocentecis andArthroscopy
Fig. 2 Level I arthroscopy. (Verde etal. Approach to TMJ Intermediate Space by Triangulation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg
2023)
153
Fig. 3 Level III arthroscopy. (Verde etal. Approach to TMJ Intermediate Space by Triangulation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2023)
majority of cases that do not respond to conser­vative treatments. The indications for arthrocen­tesis include failed conservative treatment, anterior disc displacement without reduction, TMJ trauma with associated hemarthrosis, symptomatic arthropathies such as osteoarthritis
or rheumatoid arthritis, and situations where patients opt against more invasive surgical pro­cedures. Arthrocentesis is contraindicated in the presence of tumor, degenerative bone osteo­phytes, disc perforation, overlying skin infec­tion, and condylar ankylosis.
154
Fig. 4 An example of an arthrocentesis needle with irri­gation and suction ports
A. Tebyanian

2 Techniques

The two commonly used techniques for arthro­centesis are as follows:
(A) Single-puncture technique: In this approach,
a single needle cannula with two lumens (one for inow and the other for outow) is inserted into the joint. The irrigation and lavage of the joint will be performed through this single puncture site (Fig.4).
(B) Double-puncture technique: In this method,
two needles are placed into the joint at two separate sites. One needle is used for inow, while the other is used for outow during the irrigation and lavage process.
In this chapter, we will review the more com­mon and well-studied double-puncture technique.

3 Preparation

Arthrocentesis can be performed under local anesthesia or IV sedation depending on clinician and patient preferences. Patients should be posi­tioned in a semi-reclined position, and their hair should be secured away from surgical eld using sterile towels and antibiotic ointment. External auditory canal should be protected from uid and
Fig. 5 External anatomical landmarks. (Nitzan, D.W., Naaman, H.L., (2022) Arthrocentesis; What, When, and Why. Atlas Oral Maxillofacial Surg Clin N Am 30, 137–145)
blood with soft cotton. Subsequently, the surgical eld is prepared using Betadine solution. Aside from the surgeon, who will wear a sterile gown and gloves, two additional surgical assistants will be required, but they will not need to wear sterile gloves. One of the assistants will be responsible for handling and stabilizing the mandible during the procedure, wearing non-sterile gloves for this task. The other assistant’s role will involve push­ing the uid into the joint under appropriate hydraulic pressure and suctioning the outow irrigant.
The operator draws a canthal-tragal line from the middle of the tragus to the ipsilateral lateral canthus. This topography avoids injury to upper branches of the facial nerve. The rst puncture point (A) will be marked at 10–12mm anterior to mid-tragus, 2mm inferior to this line. This is the posterior extent of glenoid fossa and should be palpated by ngertip with mandible placed in protrusion. The second point (B) will estimate the height of the articular eminence and will be marked 20 mm anterior to mid-tragus and 10mm below the canthal-tragal line. These two points will be a good estimate landmark for inow- outow needle position (Figs.5 and 6).
Arthrocentecis andArthroscopy
155
Fig. 7 Inow and outow access for irrigation and lavage
Fig. 6 Anatomical landmarks marked on patient

4 Procedure

Auriculotemporal block and local inltration into the joint will be done with 1–2 carpules 2% lido­caine with 1:1,000,000 epinephrine. Superior joint space will then be entered at point A with 18G needle directed in anterior–medial–inferior 45° angle. One easy and safe technique is to touch the tip of the needle to the zygomatic arch and slowly walk the needle into the superior joint space. Then the joint will be insufated with 2–5cc of LR via a syringe connected to the 18G needle. With the needle held in place, the syringe will be detached and IV irrigation line will be attached to the needle. A second needle previ­ously attached to IV irrigation line will be placed into the joint capsule anteriorly at point B while the assistant holding the mandible in protrusion. The second needle will serve as outow line (Fig.7). The joint will be irrigated with 250cc of LR drawn in 60cc syringes and is pushed under
Fig. 8 Joint lavage with adequate pressure and volume, with proper outow stream of the irrigant. (Adopted from Nitzan, D.W., Naaman, H.L., (2022) Arthrocentesis; What, When, and Why. Atlas Oral Maxillofacial Surg Clin N Am 30, 137–145)
moderate to high pressure by the assistant while outow can be let to drip in kidney basin held away from the surgical eld.
During the lavage, it is very important to pay attention to the position of the two needles to pre­vent their dislocation, which can block the out­ow or potentially penetrate through the thin surrounding bony walls. As long as the outow is consistent with the inow uid volume, the nee­dles should be properly positioned and held in
156
A. Tebyanian
place by the operator and lavage continued to the end (Fig. 8). After the lavage is completed, the anterior needle will be removed, and using the posterior needle, adjuncts like steroid, liquid PRF, or PRP can be injected into the superior joint space and then the posterior needle will be removed. This will conclude the sterile portionof the procedure. Then using the dominant hand, the operator will open the mandible to almost the maximum extent along with excursive move­ments to manipulate and loosen the joints multi­ple times. At the completion of joint manipulation, the Maximal Intraincisal Opening (MIO) should be around 40 mm with minimal resistance to opening.

5 Additives

There have been multiple studies clearly demon­strating that the use of adjuncts like steroids or hyaluronic acid with arthrocentesis signicantly improves outcome. Long-acting corticosteroids like triamcinolone acetonide or methylpredniso­lone acetate have robust anti-inammatory prop­erties that last weeks to months and helps reduce pain and improve function by suppressing the inammatory cytokines like TNF-alpha, interleu­kins, or interferon-gamma.
With the new advancements in the eld of regenerative medicine, platelet-rich brin, which is a second generation of platelet concentrate with longer growth factor bioavailability, has shown to promote healing, reduce inammation, and potentially improve the condition of the joint and surrounding tissue. Platelet-rich brin (PRF) provides a concentrated collection of growth fac­tors including platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), transforming growth factor beta (TGF­beta), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and it can be obtained in either solid or liquid form. Liquid PRF, also known as inject­able PRF (i-PRF), consists of liquid brinogen mixed with growth factors. Once injected, brin­ogen transforms into brin and takes on a gel-like solid state. The process of creating i-PRF involves using a horizontal centrifuge and specic liquid
PRF tubes. The centrifugation is conducted at 300g for 5 min. To collect the i-PRF from the tube, an 18G needle is used to penetrate through the tube lid. Approximately, 0.5–1 cc of i-PRF can be harvested from each tube. It is important to administer i-PRF promptly into the joint before clotting occurs to maximize its effectiveness (Fig. 6). This author uses 40mg Kenalog and 2cc of i-PRF as additives with arthrocentesis.

6 Clinical Pearls

(a) Multiple studies have investigated irrigant
volume required to sufciently reduce the pro-inammatory proteins from the joint. Most studies have concluded that 200cc is sufcient to achieve statistically signicant reduction in pro-inammatory mediators. This author’s protocol uses 250cc of LR as irrigation volume for arthrocentesis.
(b) Adequate hydraulic pressure is required to
stretch the joint space and break down the adhesions between the disc and glenoid fossa that limit the joint mobility. It has been reported that 40 KPa (kilopascal units) is sufcient to achieve this goal. Using an irrigation pump is one way to ensure that the irrigant is being ushed into the joint under sufcient pressure, but this requires additional equipment. Instead, theclinician can roughly estimate the ade­quate pressure to inject the uid by observ­ing the outow stream to stay continuous during the lavage.

7 Complications

A potential complication may arise if one or both needles are misplaced outside of the joint during the procedure causing the uid to inl­trate the surrounding tissue. This can be identi­ed by rapid swelling of the surrounding tissue. If such an occurrence happens, the lavage pro­cess should be halted immediately, and needles should be repositioned to ensure proper outow
Arthrocentecis andArthroscopy
157
and prevent further tissue inltration. The extravasated uid will be either drained through the skin pores or absorbed naturally over the course of the next several days. Other complica­tions can be injury to the branches of facial nerve, injury to the eighth cranial nerve or tym­panic disruption, perforation of the glenoid fossa, and communication with middle cranial fossa and subsequent cerebrospinal uid leak, skin hematoma or hemarthrosis, and postopera­tive infection and pain.

8 Post-op Care

The patient will be prescribed postoperative anti­biotics such as Keex to prevent infection. Pain management will involve the use of nonsteroidal anti-inammatory medication like ibuprofen 800mg TID with foodand/or mild strength nar­cotics like tramadol. As a prophylactic measure, this author typically has patients start the antibi­otic 1h prior to the surgery. To aid in the healing process, the patient will be put on a non-chew diet for 3–4 weeks. Additionally, they will be instructed to perform mouth opening and excur­sive movement exercises multiple times a day.

References

Alkan A, Kilic E.A new approach to arthrocentesis of the
temporomandibular joint. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg.
2009;38:85–6.
Dolwick MF, etal. A randomized, double-blind- placebo-
controlled study of the efcacy of steroid supplemen­tation after temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;78:1088–99.
Gonzalez-Garcia R. The current role and the future of
minimally invasive temporomandibular joint surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am. 2015;27:69–84.
Grossmann E, Poluha RL. Comparison between TMJ
arthrocentesis techniques with different needle posi­tions: a randomized single-blind controlled clinical trial. J Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surg. 2021;49:368–72.
Iskik G, et al. Does the use of injectable platelet- rich
brin after arthrocentesis for disc displacement with­out reduction improve clinical outcomes? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;81:689–97.
Kaneyama K, etal. The ideal lavage volume for removing
bradykinin, interleukin-6, and protein from temporo­mandibular joint by arthrocentesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:657–61.
Nitzan DW, Naaman HL. Arthrocentesis; what, when,
and why. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am. 2022;30:137–45.
Nitzan DW, Price A. The use of arthrocentesis for the
treatment of osteoarthritic temporomandibular joints. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;59:1154–9.
Verde L, et al. Temporomandibular Joint: Approach
to the Intermediate Space by Triangulation With Transillumination Reference. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2023;81:684–88.
Wilkes CH. Internal Derangement of Temporomandibular
Joint, Pathological Variation. Arch Otolarnygol Head Neck Surg. 1989;115:469–77.
Yura S, Totsuka Y.Relationship between effectiveness of
arthrocentesis under sufcient pressure and conditions of temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:225–8.
Yura S, Totsuka Y, Yoshikawa T. Can arthrocentesis
release intracapsular adhesions? Arthroscopic ndings before and after irrigation under sufcient hydraulic pressure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:1253–6.
Part II
Advanced Topics
The Neurological Aspects oftheTrigeminal Cranial Complex andIts Role intheTMJ Dysfunction andMultiple Movement Disorders
AnthonyB.Sims
Abbreviations
ABCFP American Board of Craniofacial Pain DHS Doctor of Humanitarian Services IMD Integrative Medical Doctor WONM World Organization of Natural Medi-
cine

1 Introduction

Aside from the brain, the masticatory system plays a major role in the functions and physiol­ogy of the head. The principal nerve to this mas­ticatory system is the trigeminal nerve (cranial nerve (CN) 5). Since CN 5 is embryologically developed from the neural crest cells and the neu­ral tube, as are the brain and spinal cord struc­tures, it too should be considered a major component in the inuence of the latter. CN 5 has a very intricate and complex integration with almost all the cranial nerves, the structures that developed from the mesencephalon, metenceph­alon, and myelencephalon, along with the cranio­facial complex of the maxilla, mandible, and temporomandibular joint (TMJ).
The term “movement disorders” is described as neurological syndromes in which there is either an excess of movement (hyperkinesias) or a paucity of voluntary and automatic movements
A. B. Sims (*) Columbia, MD, USA
unrelated to weakness or spasticity (hypokine­sias) [1]. Some movement disorders are thought to be associated with pathological changes in the basal ganglia (i.e., Parkinson’s disease [PD], idiopathic torsion dystonia, Tourette syndrome [TS], and essential tremor [ET]). ET is the most common movement disorder followed by idio­pathic PD and dystonia. The greatest attention to movement disorders concentrates on PD with all others being secondary. Diagnosing a patient with movement disorders involves (1) the proba­ble etiology of the disorder, (2) understanding whether it is isolated or associated with another neurological disorder, and (3) understanding the pattern of the disorder (see Table1). Illustrative cases are contained in Chap. 14.
What is not usually considered is that the tri­geminal cranial complex, though originating from neural embryonic tissue, could be a factor in the disturbances known as movement disorders. Through commonly known anatomical and phys­iological principles, denitions of neurological diagnoses, diagnostic examinations, evaluations, and treatments, it may be that the trigeminal cra­nial nerve holds an answer to some of the disor­ders that have previously been attributed to disorders of the brain, cerebellum, and/or basal ganglia. This chapter shows relevant content both anatomically and physiologically as to why the CN 5 system should not be ignored when diag­nosing and/or treating those with movement disorders.
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024 B. C. Stack Jr. et al. (eds.), Craniofacial Pain, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57563-1_10
161
162
Evaluation of movement disorders
Table 1
Neurologic physical exam Brain Cerebellum Cranial nerves Mental status exam Reasoning and cognition Spine/periphery Motor/strength Sensation Dysesthesias Reex testing Nerve conduction testing Visual evoked response (VER) Auditory evoked response (ABR or BAER) Muscle testing Electromyography Muscle biopsy Imaging Brain Spine Periphery Extremities
2 Embryology oftheTrigeminal
Nerve
The origin of the word trigeminal is taken from the Latin “tri-” equaling three and “-geminal” mean­ing a mass connected to a common point. There are “three” signicant branches arising from tri­geminal nerve that have four denitive nuclei in the brain stem. They are classied as follows:
• Sensory nuclei: (1) mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus located in the midbrain, (2) principal/ chief/main trigeminal nucleus located in the pons, and (3) spinal trigeminal nucleus located in the medulla and spinal cervical region
• Motor nucleus: trigeminal motor nucleus located in the pons
These types of nuclei form early during neural
development and sensory afferent bers are sent to the brain stem in the ventral medial pons. These structures form from the structures known as the rst pharyngeal and/or branchial arch. The branchial arches are embryologic structures that
A. B. Sims
develop into anatomic structures. The branchial arches give rise to the lower face, neck, and part of the upper thorax, while the frontonasal process gives rise to the forehead and nose. The struc­tures formed by the branchial arches are the result of contributions from the three primary germ lay­ers: endoderm, mesoderm, ectoderm, as well as neural crest cell derivatives.
The endoderm of the branchial arches devel­ops into endocrine viscera of the neck, including the thymus, thyroid, and parathyroid glands. The mesoderm cell layer forms vasculature and mus­culature structures from endothelial cells and myoblasts, respectively, in the head, neck, and upper thorax. Ectoderm gives rise to nervous system derivatives, while the lateral domain of surface ectoderm gives rise to the skin. The neu­ral ectoderm crest cells migrate to give rise to the bones of the skull, jaw, ear, as well as cartilage found in the head and neck. The peripheral ner­vous system itself derives from a dual origin of surface ectoderm [2].
Structures of the rst branchial arch include:
Bones: maxilla, zygoma, vomer, palatine,
mandible, squamous portion of the temporal
bone, malleus, and incus
Muscles: tensor veli tympani, tensor veli pala-
tine, anterior belly of the digastric, mylohy-
oid, masseter, temporalis, lateral and medial
pterygoids
Nerves: trigeminal and its divisions
2.1 The Trigeminal Nuclei
In understanding the trigeminal nerve, we must rst have knowledge of the different trigeminal nuclei: (A) mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus: proprioceptive information from the face; (B) principal trigeminal nucleus: light touch and dis­criminative information from the face; (C) spinal trigeminal nucleus: pain and temperature infor­mation from the face; and (D) trigeminal motor nucleus: motor efferent bers for somatic control of mastication (masseter and pterygoids).