Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5184_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
85 Мб
Скачать
Temporomandibular Joint: Review of the Anatomy, Pathology, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging…
111
coma, and metastatic tumors. In chondrosar­coma, MRI typically shows a lobulated mass with heterogeneous signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted images. The mass is usually hypointense on T1-weighted images and hyper­intense on T2-weighted images. In osteosar­coma, MRI typically shows a large, lobulated mass with heterogeneous signal intensity on T1­and T2-weighted images. The mass is usually hypointense on T1-weighted images and hyper­intense on T2-weighted images. In metastatic tumors, MRI typically shows a mass with het­erogeneous signal intensity and variable enhancement [1].
5.3 MR inEvaluation ofTumor Extent
MRI is valuable in the evaluation of tumor extent and involvement of adjacent structures. It can help to determine the involvement of the con­dyle, articular disc, and adjacent soft tissue structures. MRI can also help to identify the presence of metastases in adjacent bones and soft tissues [50].
5.4 MR inTreatment Planning
MRI is useful in treatment planning for tumors and tumorlike conditions of the TMJ.It can help to determine the extent of surgical resection and to plan for reconstruction of the TMJ.MRI can also help to guide biopsy and to monitor response to therapy [50].
MRI is a valuable tool in the evaluation of tumors and tumorlike conditions of the TMJ.It provides excellent soft tissue contrast and multi­planar imaging capabilities, which make it useful in the diagnosis and management of these condi­tions. MRI can help to determine the extent of disease, involvement of adjacent structures, and response to therapy. Further research is needed to improve our understanding of the role of MRI in the diagnosis and management of tumors and tumorlike conditions of the TMJ [25, 26].

6 TMJ Arthritis

The TMJ, like other synovial joints in the body, is susceptible to various inammatory arthritic con­ditions. In addition to degenerative arthritis, which is a common occurrence in the TMJ, arthritis resulting from crystalline deposition dis­eases is also prevalent. Furthermore, TMJ arthri­tis can be secondary to infection or trauma. It is important to discuss arthritis of the TMJ based on the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms involved in its development. By understanding the specic mechanisms at play, clinicians can better diagnose, treat, and manage TMJ arthritis to alleviate symptoms and improve the overall function of the joint [24, 27].
6.1 Degenerative Disease (Osteoarthritis)
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic degenerative dis­ease that primarily affects the articular cartilage of synovial joints. It involves the remodeling of the underlying subchondral bone and can also affect the synovium. Among all joint pathologies, TMJ is commonly affected by osteoarthritis. Interestingly, there is often a discrepancy between radiographic evidence of OA and presence of symptoms, a classic phenomenon in OA, known as clinical-radiological dissociation. Population­based studies have shown that up to 35% of asymptomatic individuals exhibit minimal con­dylar attening on radiographs, while approxi­mately 11% of patients experience TMJ symptoms related to OA [51].
The most prevalent symptom of TMJ OA is pain during chewing. Typically, the pain origi­nates from the periarticular soft tissues and masti­cator muscles, which can be in a protective reex spasm. Other common symptoms include masti­cator muscle fatigue, trismus (limited mouth opening), decreased range of motion, difculty opening the mouth, and joint crepitations [9, 20].
Radiographically, TMJ OA is characterized by specic features such as irregularities in the cortical bone of the articular surface, erosion, and formation
112
F. A. Chagas-Neto et al.
of osteophytes (Fig. 21). Erosion refers to focal areas of decreased density along the cortical margin of the mandibular condyle’s articular surface and the subchondral region (Fig. 22). Osteophyte for­mation usually occurs in the later stages of the dis-
ease and is an attempt by the joint to stabilize and increase its surface area to better withstand axial loading forces. Various imaging modalities have been utilized to assess TMJ OA, with CT and MRI being the most indicated [24, 51].
ab
Fig. 21 Degenerative changes. Coronal (a) and sagittal reformation (b) of multislice computed tomography (CT) demonstrates deformity and osteophytosis of the mandib-
ular condyle (c), subchondral sclerosis of the mandibular condyle and of the articular eminence (a), and asymmetri­cal loss of joint space
ab
Fig. 22 Degenerative changes. Coronal proton density­weighted (a) and (b) and sagittal T1-weighted (c) mag­netic resonance imaging (MRI) of three different patients
demonstrates sclerosis and osteophytosis of the mandibu­lar condyle (c), subchondral cysts (arrowheads in b) of the mandibular condyle, and loss of joint space
c
Temporomandibular Joint: Review of the Anatomy, Pathology, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging…
113
6.2 Inammatory Arthritis
6.2.1 Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most prevalent rheumatic disease in childhood, affect­ing girls more frequently than boys. The condi­tion primarily affects synovial joints, and its onset typically occurs in two peaks: the rst between 1 and 3 years of age, and the second between 8 and 12 years. TMJ involvement is observed in 17–87% of JIA patients. JIA can manifest as systemic, polyarticular, or periarticu­lar forms, with the TMJ being more commonly affected in those with polyarticular joint involve­ment. Symptoms of TMJ involvement in JIA often include pain, joint tenderness, crepitation, stiffness, and reduced range of motion. In some cases, late-stage disease may lead to the develop­ment of bony ankylosis [49, 52, 53].
Various imaging techniques such as orthopan­tomography, CT, MRI, and ultrasound have been utilized to evaluate TMJ involvement in JIA. Orthopantomography and CT are particu­larly useful in detecting bony erosions secondary to TMJ arthritis, but they involve radiation expo­sure, which can be a concern in young patients. MRI and ultrasound have gained popularity in assessing TMJ involvement in JIA due to their superior soft tissue resolution and the absence of ionizing radiation. These techniques allow for earlier diagnosis of TMJ arthritis without com­promising patient safety. Acute TMJ arthritis typically presents with joint effusion and syno­vial thickening, which are visible on T2-weighted MRI images, without apparent bony changes. However, it is important to note that joint or peri­articular tissue enhancement is not a specic sign of acute TMJ arthritis, as abnormal enhancement can also be observed in healthy individuals. Evaluation of condylar resorption, which sug­gests a more chronic TMJ arthritis, is better achieved using nonfat-suppressed T1-weighted sequences [5255].
6.2.2 Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inamma­tory condition primarily affecting periarticular tissues such as the synovial membrane, joint cap-
sules, tendons, tendon sheaths, and ligaments. Involvement of the internal joint structures occurs as a secondary effect. The prevalence of RA in the general population is approximately 2–2.5%, with a higher incidence among females. The typi­cal age of onset is between 40 and 60years, and TMJ involvement is observed in approximately 50–75% of patients with RA [54, 56, 57].
RA is a slowly progressive disease with an insidious onset, leading to the gradual destruc­tion of articular and periarticular soft tissues and adjacent bones, ultimately resulting in joint deformity. TMJ involvement typically occurs at a later stage of the disease (Fig.23). Symptoms of TMJ involvement in RA include deep, dull ach­ing pain in the preauricular area particularly dur­ing chewing, as well as limited range of motion and morning stiffness. As the disease progresses, there is gradual resorption of the mandibular con­dyle [27, 58, 59].
Radiographically, RA is characterized by spe­cic features such as loss of joint space, destruc­tion of the condyle, attening with anterior positioning of the condyle, attening of the articu­lar eminence, and erosion of the glenoid fossa. One distinguishing factor of RA is the presence of synovial proliferation, which is an early pathologi­cal process and can be visualized on MRI.Synovial proliferation is a consistent nding in all patients with RA and helps differentiate it from other types of arthritis. Additionally, joint effusion is relatively common in RA cases and can be detected through imaging examinations [24, 5659].
6.3 Metabolic Arthritis/Crystalline
Arthropathies
Calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition dis­ease (CPPD) is a metabolic arthropathy charac­terized by the accumulation of calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystals in and around joints, particularly in the articular and brocarti­lage. TMJ involvement in CPPD can range from asymptomatic calcication of the disc to signi­cant joint destruction with erosive changes in the mandibular condyle and adjacent skull base. Common symptoms include pain, swelling in the
114
cd
F. A. Chagas-Neto et al.
ab
Fig. 23 Coronal proton density-weighted (a), sagittal proton density-weighted (b), and sagittal T1-weighted (c) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and sagittal reforma­tion (d) of multislice computed tomography (CT) of the same patient demonstrate erosions (arrowheads) of the
preauricular area, and occasional hearing loss. Pain can be aggravated by chewing. Less com­mon symptoms may include TMJ clicking, tin­nitus, and malocclusion [60].
The radiographic appearance of CPPD can vary. Computed tomography (CT) reveals cal­cium deposits in the disc or periarticular tissues. On MRI, CPP deposits typically appear as areas of decreased signal intensity on both T1- and
glenoid fossa (g) and of the mandibular condyle (c). There is also synovial proliferation (arrow in a and b) in the joint space, associated with bone marrow edema in the man­dibular condyle (c)
T2-weighted sequences (Fig. 24). CT and MRI also show erosions near the condyle and fossa, accompanied by adjacent CPPD deposits. These erosions can extend into the skull base and mid­dle cranial fossa. Involvement of other joints with chondrocalcinosis can provide clues for the diag­nosis. Differential diagnoses to consider include synovial chondromatosis, synovial osteochon­droma, and osteosarcoma [46, 54].
ab
cd
Temporomandibular Joint: Review of the Anatomy, Pathology, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging…
115
Fig. 24 Coronal proton density-weighted (a), sagittal proton density-weighted (b), sagittal T1-weighted (c), and sagittal T1-weighted FAT SAT post-endovenous gadolin­ium injection magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the same patient demonstrates joint distension with uid and
6.4 Infectious Arthritis
multiple small foci with low signal intensity in all sequences, compatible with calcications (arrowheads). There is also exuberant synovitis (arrows in d), depicted in the post-contrast image. Mandibular condyle (c)
systems and concurrent systemic conditions
such as diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthri­Infections of the TMJ typically occur as a result of the direct spread of infection from nearby tis­sues into the joint space. Another important mechanism is direct contamination of the articu­lar space, after joint injections. While relatively rare, systemic infections like tuberculosis and syphilis can also affect the TMJ [25].
TMJ infection is more commonly observed
in individuals with compromised immune
tis, or a history of intravenous drug use. These
factors increase the susceptibility to TMJ
infection and can contribute to the severity
and complications associated with the
condition.
Therefore, it is crucial to consider these under­lying factors when evaluating and managing TMJ infections to ensure appropriate treatment and prevent further complications [54].
116
F. A. Chagas-Neto et al.
6.5 Idiopathic Condylar Resorption
Idiopathic condylar resorption (ICR), also known as progressive condylar resorption or condylar atrophy, is a rare and perplexing condition that pri­marily affects the TMJ.ICR is characterized by the progressive resorption of the condylar head, leading to signicant mandibular deformities and functional disturbances. The etiology of ICR remains unclear, as the condition occurs spontane­ously without any apparent triggering factors or underlying systemic diseases. This idiopathic nature makes the diagnosis and treatment of ICR particularly challenging for clinicians [6163].
ICR typically affects females in their late teens or early adulthood and often presents unilaterally, although bilateral involvement can occur. Patients with ICR may initially complain of mild symptoms such as clicking or popping in the TMJ, joint pain, or limited jaw movement. However, as the condition pro­gresses, patients may experience facial asym­metry, malocclusion, and severe TMJ dysfunction [61, 64].
The radiographic ndings typically demon­strate progressive condylar resorption, with the condylar head gradually diminishing in size and shape, leading to a loss of condylar height and structural integrity (Fig.25) [6264].
Temporomandibular Joint: Review of the Anatomy, Pathology, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging…
117
a
c
b
d
Fig. 25 Coronal proton density-weighted (a, c) and sag- ittal proton density-weighted (b, d) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the same patient demonstrates normal-
sized mandibular condyle (c) in (a) and (b) and typical ndings of idiopathic condylar resorption in (c) and (d)
118
F. A. Chagas-Neto et al.

7 Summary

TMJ disorders are a heterogeneous group of conditions that can affect the articular, muscular, and/or ligamentous components of the joint. The most common symptoms include pain, restricted movement, joint noises, and muscle tenderness, which can signicantly impact the quality of life of affected individuals. Although the etiology of TMJ disorders is not fully understood, several factors have been implicated in their pathogene­sis, including trauma, malocclusion, parafunc-
tional habits, and systemic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis. MRI is an imaging modal­ity that is commonly used for TMJ evaluation, especially for assessing the soft tissue compo­nents of the joint. MRI is highly sensitive for detecting disc displacement and other soft tissue abnormalities such as joint effusion, synovitis, and muscle edema. Moreover, MRI can provide information about the blood ow and perfusion of the joint, which can be useful for differentiat­ing between inammatory and noninammatory conditions.
Temporomandibular Joint: Review of the Anatomy, Pathology, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging…

Appendix. MRI Protocols

Plane Sequence Slice thickness TR TE FOV Mouth position
Axial T1 2mm 350 Minimal 250 Closed Coronal (oblique) T1 2mm 350 Minimal 100 Closed Sagittal (oblique) PD 2mm 1500 (350) Minimal 100 Closed Sagittal (oblique) PD 2mm 1500 (350) Minimal 100 Open Sagittal (oblique) T2 2mm 2500 70 100 Closed
Plane Sequence Slice thickness TR TE FOV Mouth position
Coronal T1 3mm 500 Minimal 250 Closed Axial T1 2mm 500 Minimal 250 Closed Left sagittal oblique T2 and PD 3500 Minimal 100 Closed Right sagittal oblique T2 and PD 3500 Minimal 100 Closed Left sagittal oblique T2 and PD 3500 Minimal 100 Open Right sagittal oblique T2 and PD 3500 Minimal 100 Open Left sagittal oblique T2 1180 64 100 Dynamic Right sagittal oblique T2 1180 64 100 Dynamic
Plane Sequence Slice thickness TR TE FOV Mouth position
Axial T1 5mm 300 12 250 Closed Coronal (oblique) T1 2mm 400–500 10–20 100 Closed Sagittal (oblique) T2 2mm 2600 120 100 Closed Sagittal (oblique) PD 2mm 2000 10–14 100 Open Sagittal (oblique) T2 GRE 2mm 600 15 100 Closed Sagittal SSFSE PD 3.5mm 88 12 150 Dynamic
Plane Sequence Slice thickness TR TE FOV Mouth position
Coronal (oblique) T1 3mm 300 11 150 Closed Coronal (oblique) PD 3mm 2000 21 150 Closed Sagittal (oblique) PD 3mm 2300 11 150 Closed Sagittal (oblique) T2 TSE FS 3mm 4500 78 150 Closed Coronal (oblique) PD 3mm 2000 20 150 Open Sagittal (oblique) PD 3mm 2300 11 150 Open Sagittal (oblique) T2 TSE FS 3mm 4500 78 150 Open
Plane Sequence Slice thickness TR TE FOV Mouth position
Axial T1 2mm 500 Minimal 250 Closed Coronal (oblique) T1 3mm 500 Minimal 100 Closed Bilateral sagittal oblique T2 and PD 3mm 3500 Minimal and 85 100 Closed and open Bilateral sagittal oblique T2 3mm 1180–2000 64 100 Dynamic cine
119

References

1. Robba T, Tanteri C, Tanteri G.MRI of the temporo­mandibular joint—correlation between imaging and pathology. Cham: Springer; 2019. https://doi.
org/10.1007/978-3-030-25421-6.
2. Vervaeke K, Verhelst P-J, Orhan K, Lund B, Benchimol D, Van der Cruyssen F, De Laat A, Jacobs R, Politis C. Correlation of MRI and arthroscopic ndings with clinical outcome in temporomandibu­lar joint disorders: a retrospective cohort study. Head Face Med. 2022;18(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/
s13005-021-00305-y.
3. Aiken A, Bouloux G, Hudgins P.MR imaging of the temporomandibular joint. Magn Reson Imaging Clin
N Am. 2012;20(3):397–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
mric.2012.05.002.
4. Vogl TJ, Günther D, Weigl P, Scholtz J-E.Diagnostic value of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Eur J Radiol Open. 2021;8:100390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
ejro.2021.100390.
5. Kamel ZSASA, El-Shafey MHR, Hassanien OA, Nagy HA. Can dynamic magnetic resonance imag­ing replace static magnetic resonance sequences in evaluation of temporomandibular joint dysfunction? Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2021;52:19. https://doi.
org/10.1186/s43055-020-00396-8.
6. Nilsson H, Magnusson B, Petersson A.Disk displace­ment and degenerative changes in the temporomandib-
120
F. A. Chagas-Neto et al.
ular joint: a cross-sectional study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107(3):346–52.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.09.020.
7. Azevedo PFM, Patrão PMRC, Torres Rodrigues BM, Ribeiro CFRC, Ribeiro NMP, Silva D, Bacelar MT. MRI of the temporomandibular joint—every­thing you need to know. ECR. 2018; https://doi.
org/10.1594/ecr2018/C-3092.
8. Xiong X, Ye Z, Tang H, Wei Y, Nie L, Wei X, Liu Y, Song B. MRI of temporomandibular joint disor­ders: recent advances and future directions. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021;54(4):1039–52. https://doi.
org/10.1002/jmri.27338.
9. Suenaga S, Hamamoto S, Kawano K, Higashida Y, Noikura T. Dynamic MR imaging of the temporo­mandibular joint in patients with arthrosis: relation­ship between contrast enhancement of the posterior disk attachment and joint pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:1475–81.
10. Al-Saleh MAQ, Alsufyani NA, Saltaji H, Jaremko JL, Major PW. MRI and CBCT image registration of temporomandibular joint: a systematic review. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;45(1):30. https://
doi.org/10.1186/s40463-016-0144-4.
11. Boccardi A.CT evaluation of chondromatosis of the temporomandibular joint. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1991;15(5):826–8.
12. Tanaka E, Detamore MS, Mercuri LG.Degenerative disorders of the temporomandibular joint: eti­ology, diagnosis, and treatment. J Dent Res. 2008;87:296–307.
13. Tomas X, Pomes J, Berenguer J, Quinto L, Nicolau C, Mercader JM, Castro V.MR imaging of temporo­mandibular joint dysfunction: a pictorial review. Radiographics. 2006;26(3):765–81. https://doi.
org/10.1148/rg.263055091.
14. Som PM, Bergeron RT.Head and neck imaging. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1991.
15. Bag AK, Gaddikeri S, Singhal A, Hardin S, Tran BD, Medina JA, Curé JK.Imaging of the temporomandibu­lar joint: an update. World J Radiol. 2014;6(8):567–82.
https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v6.i8.567.
16. Yang X, Pernu H, Pyhtinen J, Tiilikainen PA, Oikarinen KS, Raustia AM. MR abnormalities of the lateral pterygoid muscle in patients with non­reducing disk displacement of the TMJ. Cranio. 2002;20:209–21.
17. Taskaya-Yilmaz N, Ceylan G, Incesu L, Muglali M.A possible etiology of the internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint based on the MRI obser­vations of the lateral pterygoid muscle. Surg Radiol Anat. 2005;27:19–24.
18. Chossegros C, Cheynet F, Guyot L, Bellot-Samson V, Blanc JL.Posterior disk displacement of the TMJ: MRI evidence in two cases. Cranio. 2001;19:289–93.
19. Katzberg RW, Westesson P-L.Diagnosis of the tem­poromandibular joint. 1st ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1993.
20. Poveda-Roda R, Bagan JV, Diaz-Fernandez JM, Hernandez-Bazan S, Jimenez-Soriano Y. Review of
temporomandibular joint pathology. Part I: classica­tion, epidemiology and risk factors. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007;12(4):E292–8.
21. Tallents RH, Katzberg RW, Murphy W, Proskin H. Magnetic resonance imaging ndings in asymp­tomatic volunteers and symptomatic patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75:529–33.
22. Schellhas KP, Wilkes CH, Fritts HM, Omlie MR, Heithoff KB, Jahn JA.Temporomandibular joint: MR imaging of internal derangements and postoperative changes. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;150:381–9.
23. Nitzan DW. Temporomandibular joint “open lock” versus condylar dislocation: signs and symp­toms, imaging, treatment, and pathogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;60:506–11. discussion 512–3
24. Helms CA, Kaban LB, McNeill C, Dodson T.Temporomandibular joint: morphology and signal intensity characteristics of the disk at MR imaging. Radiology. 1989;172:817–20.
25. Dimitroulis G. Condylar resorption of the temporo­mandibular joint: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63(3):379–86.
26. Chang C-L, Wang D-H, Yang M-C, Hsu W-E, Hsu M-L.Functional disorders of the temporomandibular joints: internal derangement of the temporomandibu­lar joint. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018;34(4):223–30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2018.01.004.
27. Eriksen ES, Hellem S, Skartveit L, Brun JG, Bøe OE, Moen K, Geitung JT.Temporomandibular joint pain and associated magnetic resonance ndings: a retrospective study with a control group. Acta Radiol Open. 2020;9(9):2058460120938738. https://doi.
org/10.1177/2058460120938738.
28. Ribeiro RF, Tallents RH, Katzberg RW, Murphy WC, Moss ME, Magalhaes AC, Tavano O.The prevalence of disc displacement in symptomatic and asymptom­atic volunteers aged 6 to 25 years. J Orofac Pain. 1997;11:37–47.
29. Ahmad M, Schiffman EL. Temporomandibular joint disorders and orofacial pain. Dent Clin North Am. 2016;60(1):105–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
cden.2015.08.004.
30. Bonjardim LR, Gaviao MB, Pereira LJ, Castelo PM. Anxiety and depression in adolescents and their relationship with signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders. Int J Prosthodont. 2005;18(4):347–52.
31. Widmalm SE, Westesson PL, Kim IK, Pereira FJ, Lundh H, Tasaki MM. Temporomandibular joint pathosis related to sex, age, and dentition in autopsy material. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994;78:416–25.
32. Tamimi D, Jalali E, Hatcher D.Temporomandibular joint imaging. Radiol Clin North Am. 2018;56(1):157–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
rcl.2017.08.011.
33. Gauer RL, Semidey MJ.Diagnosis and treatment of temporomandibular disorders. Am Fam Physician. 2015;91(6):378–86.