Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5184_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
85 Мб
Скачать
Structural Misalignment: Postural Changes Related toTemporomandibular Joint Pathology
215
39. Stack B, Sims A. The relationship between pos­ture and equilibrium and the auriculotemporal nerve in patients with disturbed gait and balance. Cranio. 2009;27(4):248–60. https://doi.org/10.1179/
crn.2009.036.
40. Wiest DM, Candotti CT, Sedrez JA, Pivotto LR, da Costa LMR, Loss JF. Severidade da disfunção tem­poromandibular e sua relação com a postura corporal. Fisioterapia E Pesquisa. 2019;26(2):178–84. https://
doi.org/10.1590/1809- 2950/18037026022019.
41. Xiao CQ, Wan YD, Li YQ, Yan ZB, Cheng QY, Fan PD, Huang Y, Wang XY, Xiong X. Do tem-
poromandibular disorder patients with joint pain exhibit forward head posture? A cephalometric study. Pain Res Manag. 2023;2023:7363412. https://
doi.org/10.1155/2023/7363412. PMID: 36776487;
PMCID: PMC9911253.
42. Yitschaky O, Yitschaky M, Zadik Y. Case report on trial: do you, doctor, swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth? J Med Case Rep. 2011;5:179.
5- 179. PMID: 21569508; PMCID: PMC3113995.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1752- 1947-

TMJ Pathology Treatment

LidiaYavich

1 Introduction

Four clinical cases are presented and the cases are to emphasize their respective nuances and encourage reporting and publication of complex TMD cases. Images and bioinstrumentation measurements are presented as well as highlights from the clinical his­tories. One case is presented in its two complete phases, and the other three clinical cases aim to point out the improvements that can be achieved.
As mentioned previously, TMJ can be affected by local and systemic pathologies, trauma, infec­tions, autoimmune diseases, and occlusal prob­lems among other etiologies. All these etiological factors can act separately or in concert, making the clinical case more difcult to resolve and modifying expectations of the patient and practi­tioner for resolution.

2 Case 1

2.1 TMJ Pathologies inChildren
andTeenagers: TheOverlooked Diagnosis
The importance of this case report is that struc­tural improvements were achieved in the rst phase of treatment. Can treatment sometimes
L. Yavich (*) SBPAT, The Brazilian Society for Diagnosis and Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Pathologies, Attending, Clinica My, Porto Allege, RS, Brazil
improve the TMJ pathological situation, or pre­vent it from worsening? This case report draws attention to TMJ pathologies in children and teenagers where the TMJ may be compromised.
2.2 Case Report
A 14-year-old female patient presented to the clinic complaining of pain in the lower teeth, shoulder pain, and TMJ clicking on the left side. Aesthetic correction is an important issue for the patient, but she and her mother were also con­cerned with the pain in the lower teeth and the origin of the clicking noise (Fig.1). The patient’s occlusion suggests a simple case. It is expected to be very easy to evaluate and diagnose the need for a superior expansion to accommodate and advance the mandible and afterward to treat the vertical deciency (Figs.2 and 3). With this lami- nography, one can see the retro-position of the left closed-mouth TMJ (highlighted in red), the change in the growth axis direction on this same side, and the loss of joint space on both sides. These images do not show the articular disc con­dition or the ligaments which can only be seen in an MRI.The panoramic radiograph for the tem­poromandibular joints cannot be compared to a CT scan of the temporomandibular joints and is a basic examination for the TMJ.
When evaluating a functional failure, one must consider all the etiologic factors involved in the dysfunction. The patient reports a trauma
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024 B. C. Stack Jr. et al. (eds.), Craniofacial Pain, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57563-1_13
217
218
Fig. 1 Intraoral records of the patient’s habitual occlusion
L. Yavi ch
Fig. 2 Patient’s initial panoramic radiograph
when she was a child, “I hit my neck, near my chin, playing on the bedside table.” A change in the direction of the growth axis does not happen physiologically. It is very common for patients not to remember these childhood traumas.
Besides the rectication of the cervical spine, there is the start of an inversion of the physiologi­cal curvature from C4 (Fig.4). Cephalometry is a very important part of the diagnosis and treat­ment of cases, both in orthodontics and facial orthopedics; however, it is not an exam to show
the pathology of temporomandibular joints. An MRI of the temporomandibular joints was ordered (Figs.5 and 6).
The two slices, (1) external and (2) medial, show irregularity of the bone cortex and anterior articular disc dislocation. Even though CT is the method par excellence for observing bone ero­sions, studies comparing bone erosion scores and quantitative measures of erosions in RA joints on CT and MR images demonstrate very high intramodality and intermodality agree-
TMJ Pathology Treatment
a
b
219
Fig. 3 Laminography of the temporomandibular joints in the closed and open mouth (a). (b) The same images with color highlights
Fig. 4 Patient’s initial lateral and cervical spine (left) radiograph with a cephalometric tracing (right), all before treatment
ment. Medial slice (1) shows superior attening, an anterior marginal osteophyte, and articular disc dislocation. External slice (2) also shows superior attening and anterior articular disc dislocation. This is the TMJ of a 14-year-old girl!
Systemic diseases, traumas, infections, dam­age to growth centers, and muscle balance dis­ruption can profoundly inuence the craniofacial complex during this critical growth phase. There was no crepitus, nor pain in the TMJ was present, only a click.
220
ab
ab
Fig. 5 MRI: two slices of the left TMJ closed mouth before treatment
L. Yavi ch
Fig. 6 MRI two slices of the right TMJ closed mouth before treatment
If one cannot improve this situation because of the sequelae of different etiologies, the next step is to analyze if one can prevent it from wors­ening and improve the patient’s life quality. The patient should be informed about the difculties and limitations of their cases.
For a dynamic record of SEMG (Fig.7), the patient is asked to open her mouth, clench, and swallow. In this record, one can observe that the patient cannot maintain strength in clenching, even though she was instructed to clench her teeth and not to open for the duration of the
ca
ab
cd
TMJ Pathology Treatment
b
Fig. 7 Initial dynamic electromyography (a) in habitual occlusion (b) and jaw tracker data (c)
221
Fig. 8 Comparison of the SEMG records of the patient, (a, b) in habitual occlusion and (c, d) with orthotic in place
exam. Her masticatory muscles were electroni­cally deprogrammed with a dental TENS unit, and a bite record in neuromuscular physiologi­cal position was registered using a jaw tracker. The information obtained from the images and the individualized objectives for each clinical case should always be considered in the bite registration. Bioinstrumentation is a useful tool but is only a part of the decision on bite registration.
tial MRI.We can notice an improvement in the cervical spine physiological curve and an increase in the intervertebral spaces (Fig.10). In all these images, Figs.11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16, we can observe the improvement in the relation­ship between the mandible head and the articu­lar disc and the positive remodeling of the cortical bone.
In this specic case, the questions that have to be asked are the following:
The patient had a pathological free space of
4.3mm and a retro-position of 2.1mm. With this data, an orthotic can be fabricated. This device is electromyographically tested to represent the ideal muscle position. With dynamic electromy­ography (Fig.8), and with the orthotic in a neuro-
• Was there a pathologic condition of the
patient’s TMJ? If so, which structures were
affected?
• Is it possible to heal or improve the damaged
structures?
muscular physiological position, the patient can maintain the strength of the bite. In fact, she increased the strength of the masseters and bal­anced both digastric muscles.
These images showing the joint decompres­sion (Fig. 9) do not reveal the position of the articular disc nor the improvement of the irregu­larities on the cortical bone observed in the ini-
The goal is to bring these structures as close to a healthy function as possible. Is this always pos­sible? When it is possible, the structures must be improved. Differential diagnosis allows us a dif­ferential prognosis: favorable or not. Not all arthropathies will have the same result as this case.
222
ab
L. Yavi ch
a
b
Fig. 9 (a) Laminography of the temporomandibular joints in the closed and open mouth with the orthotic constructed in neuromuscular physiological position; (b) the same image with color highlights
Fig. 10 Patient’s lateral and cervical spine comparison: (a) in habitual occlusion and (b) with the orthotic constructed in neuromuscular physiological occlusion
ab ab
TMJ Pathology Treatment
Fig. 11 Comparative MRI images of the left TMJ sagittal external slice, closed mouth position, (a) before treatment and (b) after the rst phase of the treatment
223
Fig. 12 Comparative MRI images of the left TMJ, sagittal medial slice, closed mouth position, (a) before treatment and (b) after the rst phase of the treatment
224
ab
ab
Fig. 13 Comparative MRI images of the left TMJ, sagittal internal slice, closed mouth position, (a) before treatment and (b) after the rst phase of the treatment
L. Yavi ch
Fig. 14 Comparative MRI images of the right TMJ, sagittal external slice, closed mouth position, (a) before treatment and (b) after the rst phase of the treatment
ab
ab
TMJ Pathology Treatment
Fig. 15 Comparative MRI images of the right TMJ, sagittal medial slice, closed mouth position, (a) before treatment and (b) after the rst phase of the treatment
225
Fig. 16 Comparative MRI images of the right TMJ, sagittal internal slice, closed mouth position, (a) before treatment and (b) after the rst phase of the treatment