Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5184_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
85 Мб
Скачать
Imaging oftheCommon Conditions oftheTemporomandibular Joint
ab c
def
81
Fig. 14 Sagittal cross-section images show joint effu­sion. T2WI image (a) in closed position reveals mild to moderate joint effusion in the anterior recess of the supe­rior compartment. MERGE image (b) in closed position shows the presence of synovial uid within the anterior recess of the superior compartment, delineating the con­tours of the disc and its posterior attachment. In the MERGE image (c) of the same patient upon mouth open-
ing, the uid migrates to the posterior recess of the supe­rior compartment. PD FS (d) and T2 STIR (e) images of a patient in open position illustrate mild joint effusion in the anterior recess of the superior compartment and limited condylar movement. MERGE image (f) of a different patient in closed position shows moderate joint effusion in the anterior recess of the superior compartment
abc
Fig. 15 CBCT sagittal cross-sectional images (a and b) and 3D volume rendering (c) show hypermobility. In the closed-mouth position (a), the condyle is located posteri-
that responds to functional needs and does not necessarily signify any pathology or dysfunction.
orly within the fossa, while in the open-mouth position (b), the condyle translates to a point anterior and superior to the crest of the eminence (b and c)
3.2.5 Degenerative Joint Disease
The terms degenerative joint disease (DJD), osteoarthritis, and osteoarthrosis are frequently
82
ab
H. Demirturk and A. Potluri
Fig. 16 PDWI sagittal views show hypomobility in the left TMJ. (a) In the closed position, the condyle is posteri­orly positioned in the fossa, and the disc is anterior to the condyle (arrow). (b) In the open position, the position of
the disc remains relatively unchanged relative to the fossa (arrow), while the condyle translates to the intermediate zone of the disc. These observations suggest adhesion in the superior compartment of the TMJ
a b
Fig. 17 CBCT axially corrected sagittal and coronal views demonstrate mild attening on the anterosuperior aspect of the left condyle consistent with functional remodeling. This
process represents the bone’s effort to enlarge its surface area in order to distribute and manage increased loads on the joint surface. Sagittal (a) and coronal (b) views
used interchangeably. DJD is a noninammatory degenerative condition that can develop in the TMJ.DJD occurs when the functional demands on the articular tissues exceed their remodeling capacity, leading to the destruction of these tis­sues. It can affect either a single joint or both
joints bilaterally, and the progression of this con­dition may also vary between the two joints, lead­ing to alterations in the shape and functionality of the mandible.
In the context of TMJs, primary DJD is con­sidered idiopathic. Secondary DJD is generally
ab
Imaging oftheCommon Conditions oftheTemporomandibular Joint
83
assumed to occur after the displacement of the disc when there is bony contact between the con­dyle and the articular fossa. However, there have been reports suggesting that DJD can develop
phytes, surface erosion, and subcortical pseudo­cysts. These features are illustrated in Figs.9,
18, 19, 20, 21, and 22 and are described as
follows:
before disc displacement occurs.
DJD is typically diagnosed radiographically, as clinical signs and symptoms often have lim­ited validity. Three key radiographic features indicative of a diagnosis of DJD include osteo-
• Osteophyte is characterized by marginal hypertrophy with sclerotic borders and angu­lar, exophytic, osseous formation from the surface.
c d
Fig. 18 Coronal (a and b) and sagittal (c and d) cross sections of right (a and c) and left (b and d) TMJs with active degenerative joint disease. Erosion and decortica­tion are seen on anterosuperior articular surface of both
condyles (white arrow), with visible hint of recortication and fuzzy appearance on the left (black arrow), indicative of healing process
84
ab
H. Demirturk and A. Potluri
c d
Fig. 19 Coronal (a and b) and sagittal (c and d) cross sections of right (a and c) and left (b and d) TMJs with severe degenerative joint disease. Bilateral condyles, articular eminences, and mandibular fossae show signi­cant volume loss, severe attening, and sclerosis. Notably, there is subchondral cyst on the right condyle (thin white arrow) close to proximal surface, thickening of the left
mandibular fossa roof, vertical height loss in both con­dyles, and shallower mandibular fossae. Erosion and decortication on the superior articular surface of right condyle (white arrow) are consistent with active phase of the disease. Recortication and osteophyte on the anterior aspect of the left condyle (black arrow) showing that the disease has reached the stable stage
Imaging oftheCommon Conditions oftheTemporomandibular Joint
abc
85
Fig. 20 Visualization of a subchondral bone cyst (arrows) using various MRI protocols on the same condyle; signal variations can be seen across different imaging sequences:
(a) T1WI (b) PDWI, (c) MERGE. (Courtesy T.Gokdeniz, DDS and K.Orhan, DDS)
abc
Fig. 21 Coronal (a) and sagittal (b and c) cross sections of the right TMJ show degenerative joint disease with sig­nicant vertical height and volume loss in the condyle and possible irregular cortical break on the mandibular fossa
• Surface erosion refers to the loss of continuity in the articular cortex, which can occur in the condyle, fossa, or both.
• Subcortical pseudocyst (subchondral bone cyst, Ely cyst) is a cavity beneath the articular surface that deviates from normal marrow pat­tern. It is not a true cyst but rather represents the loss of trabecular bone structure in that area.
roof (a and b). Note large osteophyte in the anterior aspect of the condyle (c). The disease has not yet reached the stable phase
Additional radiographic ndings associated with potential osseous remodeling include articu­lar surface attening and subcortical sclerosis. These can be challenging to denitively diagnose as DJD because they may arise due to various factors, including aging, functional remodeling of the joints, or precursors to DJD. Over time, attening and sclerosis can progress to DJD; as such, it would represent regressive remodeling or remain stable, reecting adaptive remodeling
The above radiographic features play a critical
(Fig.17).
role in diagnosing DJD.
86
ab
H. Demirturk and A. Potluri
• Surface attening refers to losing the rounded contour of the condyle or the articular emi­nence. It is important to note that this feature can be observed in normal, healthy joints and be a variation of the normal anatomy.
• Subcortical sclerosis is described as an increase in the thickness of the cortical plate in areas that bear the load in relation to adja­cent non-load-bearing areas. This is often associated with increased loading of the joint or can occur with normal loading when there is disc displacement.
The initial phase of DJD begins on the supe-
rior surface of the mandibular condyle. It may be observed in axially corrected sagittal cross­section images as a disruption of the cortical out­line and loss of trabecular structure beneath the surface (Figs. 18, 19, and 21). This stage is referred to as “active DJD.” As the erosions go through a healing process and recorticate, the condyle undergoes a reduction in size, resulting in a loss of both vertical height and volume (Figs. 19 and 22). The process of recortication, whether partial or complete, on the articular sur-
face is regarded as a component of the healing stage (Fig.18).
When recortication is fully accomplished, DJD is considered in a “stable” phase (Figs.19 and 22). Additional radiographic indicators of stable DJD include osteophytes, generally on the anterior aspect of the condyle, and loose articular bodies known as “joint mice,” which can be considered synovial chondromatosis sec­ondary to DJD (Fig.23). It is important to note that if excessive forces are reintroduced, the entire process may reactivate, potentially lead­ing to further erosion and loss of condylar vol­ume. Reapplication of excessive forces can potentially reactivate the entire process, leading to new erosion and further loss of condylar volume.
3.2.6 Inammatory Disorders
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inamma­tory autoimmune condition with an unknown eti­ology. It is characterized by joint tenderness, swelling, and progressive destruction of synovial
Fig. 22 The sagittal cross-sectional CBCT images (a and b) illustrate characteristic features of TMJ degenerative
joint disease, including severe condylar attening, vertical height loss, subchondral sclerosis, and presence of a large
osteophyte. Recortication, more prominent on the left, is suggestive of a stable phase. The mandibular fossa and articular eminences are shallow and exhibit sclerosis, and attening indicating the advanced nature of the disease
Imaging oftheCommon Conditions oftheTemporomandibular Joint
abc
87
Fig. 23 CBCT sagittal (a and c) and axial (b) cross sec- tions illustrate loose articular bodies (arrows) secondary to degenerative joint disease, also referred to as “second­ary synovial chondromatosis” or “joint mice.” While the
joints. This can result in severe disability and an increased risk of premature mortality. RA can result in synovitis, which, in turn, can lead to the formation of synovial granulation tissue, com­monly referred to as pannus.
Joint involvement in RA typically follows a polyarticular distribution and often presents with symmetrically bilateral. Patients commonly experience chronic episodes of are-ups and periods of remission. TMJ involvement in RA is rare despite the widespread polyarticular nature of the disease.
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), also known as juvenile RA or Still’s disease, is an autoim­mune pediatric rheumatic condition. In JIA patients, TMJ involvement can be remarkably high, with rates reported as high as 87%, and TMJ can be the sole joint affected by JIA.Patients may be asymptomatic or show restricted jaw movement, mandibular asymmetry, and a class II malocclusion due to irreversible condylar resorption.
Imaging
The most frequent nding of RA is the erosion of the condylar head on a panoramic radiograph and attening of the articular eminence, subchondral cyst, erosion, and reduced joint space on CT.On MRI, the most common ndings are the abnor­mal (increased) signal intensity of the condylar
osseous components of the TMJ exhibit degenerative joint disease changes, there is no mass effect typically associ­ated with primary synovial chondromatosis
bone marrow, high signal intensity in the joint space due to the uid (synovitis), erosion of the condylar cortex, and resorption that may extend to more than half of the condylar head. The pan­nus usually exhibits an intermediate signal inten­sity on both T1- and T2WI.In JIA, CBCT can show bilateral at and signicantly misshapen condyles, often accompanied by a widened gle­noid fossa, elongated and superiorly positioned coronoid processes, and clockwise rotation of the mandible, which can be attributed to the short­ened condyles (Fig.24).
In RA, there are some key differences com-
pared to DJD:
• Disc position: In RA, the disc can remain in a normal position even in the presence of signicant osseous changes. In contrast, in DJD, disc displacement is more common.
• Osteophyte formation: Osteophyte (bone spur) formation is not common in RA but is more frequent in DJD.
• Effusion: RA patients tend to have a higher frequency of joint effusion (accumulation of uid in the joint) than patients with DJD.
• Condylar shape: The characteristic appear­ance of a condyle affected by RA resembles a “sharpened pencil.” In DJD, the erosions on the condyle tend to display a pattern of focal erosions and subsequent loss of volume.
88
cd
H. Demirturk and A. Potluri
a
b
Fig. 24 CBCT reconstructions reveal marked changes in the bilateral TMJs in a young patient suspicious for juve­nile rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile degenerative joint disease (idiopathic condylar resorption): panoramic reconstruction (a) demonstrates prominent antegonial notch (arrow), steep mandibular plane (thin arrow), and notably short mandibular rami. In a sagittal oblique view
• Joint involvement: RA often affects TMJs bilaterally due to being a systemic autoim­mune condition involving multiple joints throughout the body. DJD can affect either a single joint or both joints.
In certain instances, both conditions can coex-
ist when there is a displacement of the disc and DJD develops simultaneously.
Synovial Chondromatosis
Synovial chondromatosis (SC) is a rare benign condition characterized by the proliferation of
of the right mandible (b) and volume renderings of the right (c) and left (d) mandible, notable features include a condylar stump (white arrow), underdeveloped mandibu­lar fossa, and eminence (black arrows) suggesting that this condition likely started earlier in life, prior to their full development and long coronoid process (thin arrows) compared to the condylar process
nodular cartilaginous or osteocartilaginous enti­ties within the synovium of a joint. Over time, these entities ossify, detach, and are observed as loose bodies oating in the joint space.
Imaging
Panoramic radiographs can reveal signs of SC once the cartilage undergoes ossication. However, for a comprehensive diagnosis and treatment planning, CT and MRI are advised. MRI is particularly useful as it can display multiple nodular entities, whether cartilaginous or osseous in nature and joint effusion. On T1WI,
Imaging oftheCommon Conditions oftheTemporomandibular Joint
abc
89
Fig. 25 Sagittal (a), coronal (b), and 3D volume- rendering (c) CBCT images illustrating primary synovial chondromatosis in the right (TMJ), displaying multiple well-dened calcied structures with low-density centers,
heterogeneous and hypointense loose bodies are observed in the superior joint space. On T2WI, hyperintense effusion± expansion and a “ring­like” signal caused by hyperintense uid sur­rounding a group of hypointense loose bodies are commonly seen. These ndings are indicative of the condition. On CT or CBCT, irregular joint surface, limited motion, widened joint space, cal­cied loose bodies, sclerotic mandibular condyle, and glenoid fossa can be seen (Fig.25).

4 Summary

Imaging is a fundamental element in the assess­ment of the patient with suspected TMJ dysfunc­tion and/or craniofacial pain. There are many imaging options available to characterize TMJ dysfunction, whether caused by congenital abnormalities or internal derangements.
Proceeding directly to imaging should be avoided. A thorough physical exam is crucial for
the formulation of a proper differential diagnosis and ordering of appropriate radiology.

Suggested Readings

1. Koenig LJ, Tamimi D, Perschbacher SE, Demirturk H. editors. Diagnostic imaging: oral and maxillofacial, 3rd ed. Elsevier; 2023.
in the superior, medial, and anterior aspects of the condyle and inferior to the crest of articular eminence. (Courtesy, M.Noujeim DDS)
2. Alsulaimani FF, Alswajy WA. Orthodontic manage­ment of anterior disc displacement without reduction. J Orthod Sci. 2022;11:30. https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.
jos_24_22. eCollection 2022.
3. Ding L, Chen R, Liu J, Wang Y, Chang Q, Ren L.The effect of functional mandibular advancement for ado­lescent patients with skeletal class II malocclusion on the TMJ: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):51. https://doi.org/10.1186/
s12903- 022- 02075- 8.
4. Tamimi D, Kocasarac HD, Mardini S. Imaging of the temporomandibular joint. Semin Roentgenol. 2019;54(3):282–301. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.
ro.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
5. Poluha RL, Canales GT, Costa YM, Grossmann E, Bonjardim LR, Conti PCR. Temporomandibular joint disc displacement with reduction: a review of mechanisms and clinical presentation. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019;27:e20180433. https://doi.
org/10.1590/1678- 7757- 2018- 0433.
6. Kellenberger CJ, Junhasavasdikul T, Tolend M, Doria AS.Temporomandibular joint atlas for detection and grading of juvenile idiopathic arthritis involvement by magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Radiol. 2018;48(3):411–26.
017- 4000- 0. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
7. Prechel U, Ottl P, Ahlers OM, Neff A.The treatment of temporomandibular joint dislocation. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018;115(5):59–64. https://doi.org/10.3238/
arztebl.2018.0059.
8. Ahmad M, Schiffman EL. Temporomandibular joint disorders and orofacial pain. Dent Clin N Am. 2016;60(1):105–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
cden.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
9. Melo DP, Oliveira LCAF, Carvalho ACA, Oenning ACC, Gonzaga AKG, Campos PSF. Temporomandibular joint disc adhesion: evi-
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-
90
H. Demirturk and A. Potluri
dence from magnetic resonance images. RGO—Rev Gaúch Odontol. 2014;62(2):169–72.
10. Barkin S, Weinberg S. Internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint: the role of arthroscopic surgery and arthrocentesis. J Can Dent Assoc. 2000;66(4):199–203.
11. Obwegeser HL, Makek MS. Hemimandibular hyperplasia- hemimandibular elongation. J Maxillofac Surg. 1986;14(4):183–208.